Talk:Doge of Venice: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
OneClickArchived "Term of office" to Talk:Doge of Venice/Archive 1 |
{{Talk header}} |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} |
|||
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=B|1= |
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=B|1= |
||
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=Low}} |
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=Low}} |
||
| Line 8: | Line 9: | ||
{{small|Above undated message substituted from [[Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment]] by [[User:PrimeBOT|PrimeBOT]] ([[User talk:PrimeBOT|talk]]) 19:40, 16 January 2022 (UTC)}} |
{{small|Above undated message substituted from [[Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment]] by [[User:PrimeBOT|PrimeBOT]] ([[User talk:PrimeBOT|talk]]) 19:40, 16 January 2022 (UTC)}} |
||
== Able to leave the Palace complex? == |
|||
I was under the impression that the Doge could leave the lagoon, if he was accompanied by two observers. Someone with more time could find it in John Norwich's "History of Venice", which is where I think I read it. [[User:Plasticbadge|Plasticbadge]] 13:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:It's patently obvious that the Doge ''could'' leave (e.g. [[Enrico Dandolo]] and [[Francesco Morosini]]); this seems to have been confusion from a limitation on his meeting with agents of foreign powers. [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 15:35, 3 September 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:Well, the text in the article was: <blockquote>He was by law forbidden to leave the city, confined for the rest of his life to the [[Doge's Palace]] complex and the connected [[Basilica di San Marco]]. (Compare with the ''[[podestà]]'' of other Italian republics who were confined by their term office).</blockquote> I'll try to search through my copy of Norwich, but this seems to be, on the surface of it, utter nonsense. (Incidenally, members of the [[Council of Ten]] ''were'' confined to the palace for the duration of their terms, if I recall correctly.) [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill Lokshin]] 15:39, 3 September 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:: I have seen the claim repeated on an information panel on my last visit to the Doge's palace. The simple reason given was something like that the Doge's seal was essential to the witnessing of city business, so they needed to keep him around as a physical transaction validation device. It seems like a lousy job, frankly, one you'd only want to retire into. Perhaps I can talk my wife into a repeat visit "fact checking trip" to verify the exact wording they used. |
|||
:: [[User:Inopinatus|Inopinatus]] ([[User talk:Inopinatus|talk]]) 08:11, 17 February 2014 (UTC) |
|||
::Did someone remove that text from the article? Because I don't see it anymore. |
|||
::~ender 2008-04-10 12:26:PM MST |
|||
::Kiril Loshkin, I'm at the beginning of Norwhich's coverage of the 12th century and have yet to see it, though it probably came later. Some of what has been removed is in the List of Doges of Venice article and really should be moved back here. [[User:InMyHumbleOpinion|IMHO]] ([[User talk:InMyHumbleOpinion|talk]]) 22:22, 21 December 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Wow? |
|||
Such doge |
|||
Much Venice |
|||
Very Imperial <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/67.255.212.207|67.255.212.207]] ([[User talk:67.255.212.207|talk]]) 15:25, 26 January 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Surveillance? == |
|||
"the doge was constantly under strict surveillance" |
|||
I was reading in some fiction that the [[Council of Ten|Capi]] (and boy there's a lot of questions in that article) were constantly watching him, except for when he was in his bed-chamber, with his wife. Yet, he can conduct business? And/or open mail from non-foreign powers?<br>I'd like some more details.<br>~ender 2008-04-10 12:23:PM MST |
|||
== IPA == |
|||
The IPA for the pronunciation of "Doge" seems to be incorrect. The correct Italian pronunciation is {{IPA|it|ˈdɔːdʒe}}. In fact, I'm not sure why this article is using English IPA at all. I have added the the Italian pronunciation to the article, but have left the supposed English pronunciation as well, for now. [[User:Tad Lincoln|Tad Lincoln]] ([[User talk:Tad Lincoln|talk]]) 05:55, 16 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Seeing as this is an article on the English Wikipedia I think English IPA should be a given. --[[Special:Contributions/87.82.207.195|87.82.207.195]] ([[User talk:87.82.207.195|talk]]) 21:46, 29 November 2013 (UTC) |
|||
: |
|||
:Why the Italian pronunciation? Shouldn't it be based upon [[Venetian Language]]? --[[Special:Contributions/75.71.117.214|75.71.117.214]] ([[User talk:75.71.117.214|talk]]) 07:49, 30 November 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Still, as far as I know, the correct Italian pronunciation should have the final 'e'. It's very rare that Italian words don't end in a vowel. I'm Venetian, but I'm pretty sure I've never heard it in Italian as it's written here. I'm asking a (Roman) linguist about this, I'll update as soon as I know. - klez <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/79.45.31.14|79.45.31.14]] ([[User talk:79.45.31.14|talk]]) 13:32, 25 January 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
: I found an Italian dictionary (the state TV one) that uses the 'e' at the end of the word. http://www.dizionario.rai.it/poplemma.aspx?lid=64523&r=24441 - klez <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/79.45.31.14|79.45.31.14]] ([[User talk:79.45.31.14|talk]]) 14:51, 25 January 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
: All the English dictionaries give the pronunciation (in UK and American English) as /ˈdoʊdʒ/ or /ˈdoʊʒ/, not /ˈdoʊdʒeɪ/. Is there any source for the latter?[[Special:Contributions/74.88.18.227|74.88.18.227]] ([[User talk:74.88.18.227|talk]]) 14:01, 15 December 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== External links modified == |
|||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|||
I have just modified {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on [[Doge of Venice]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=754809757 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080112132632/http://www.museiciviciveneziani.it:80/frame.asp?pid=608&z=2&tit=Ducale to http://www.museiciviciveneziani.it/frame.asp?pid=608&z=2&tit=Ducale |
|||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}). |
|||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}} |
|||
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 16:58, 14 December 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== Introductory paragraph doesn't read well and is ambiguous == |
|||
Could someone with more knowledge of the subject revise this part? I found it confusing. In particular: |
|||
<blockquote>Doges of Venice were elected for life by the city-state's aristocracy. </blockquote> |
|||
and then: |
|||
<blockquote>The title "doge" was '''the title of the senior-most elected official of Venice''' and Genoa; both cities were republics and elected doges.</blockquote> |
|||
My question would be whether the doge was especially elected to be the doge i.e. in an election specific for that purpose, or whether it was just the senior most official who was ''already'' elected. |
|||
[[User:CryptoCat|CryptoCat]] ([[User talk:CryptoCat|talk]]) 14:09, 27 February 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== CROWN OF EGYPT == |
== CROWN OF EGYPT == |
||
Latest revision as of 01:47, 4 November 2024
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Doge of Venice article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 September 2020 and 10 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mmatisse.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:40, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
CROWN OF EGYPT
[edit]"This ceremonial cap may have been ultimately based on the white crown of Upper Egypt." The source for this nonsense is Samuel Sharpe in a book published in 1863. If there is no recent respectable scholarly source for this shouldn't it be removed? METRANGOLO1 (talk) 16:11, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Venetian Renaissance Art
[edit] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 September 2023 and 12 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nycgirl00 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Eddiwong, Ldray.
— Assignment last updated by MayaHBu (talk) 21:12, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Infobox title
[edit]There had been some back-and-fort editing earlier, a high-profile user just reverted my edit, thinking that my edit is not an improvement. In which I tried to rearranged the infobox (by just moving the title above the name). Literally most monarchial infoboxes have that (examples: Emperor of Russia, German Emperor) G0dzillaboy02 (talk) 13:21, 11 September 2024 (UTC)