Jump to content

2012 Australian federal budget: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m clean up using AWB
rm dead pov tag: no extant dispute
 
(25 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{POV-check|date=June 2012}}
{{Use Australian English|date=April 2024}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2017}}
{{Infobox Government Budget
{{Infobox Government Budget
| title = Australian federal budget
| title = Australian federal budget 2012–13
| year = 2012
| country = Australia
| country = Australia
| previous_budget = 2011 Australian federal budget
| previous_budget = Australian federal budget, 2011–12
| previous_year = 2011
| previous_year = 2011–12
| next_budget = 2013 Australian federal budget
| next_budget = Australian federal budget, 2013–14
| next_year = 2013
| next_year = 2013–14
| image = Australian Coat of Arms.png
| image = Coat of Arms of Australia.svg
| imagesize = 250px
| imagesize = 250px
| caption =
| caption =
Line 16: Line 16:
| presented =
| presented =
| passed =
| passed =
| parliament = [[Australian federal election, 2010|43rd]]
| parliament = [[2010 Australian federal election|43rd]]
| party = [[Australian Labor Party]]
| party = [[Australian Labor Party]]
| treasurer = [[Wayne Swan]]
| treasurer = [[Wayne Swan]]
| Total_Revenue = ''$376.1 billion''
| Total_Revenue = ''$376.1 billion''
| Total_Expenditures = ''$376.3 billion''
| Total_Expenditures = ''$376.3 billion''
| spending =
| spending =
| tax_cut =
| tax_cut =
| debt_payment =
| debt_payment =
| surplus = ''$1.5 billion''
| surplus = ''$1.5 billion (Forecast)''
| deficit =
| deficit =
| debt =
| debt =
Line 33: Line 33:
}}
}}


The '''2012 [[Australian federal budget]]''' for the [[Fiscal year#Australia|Australian financial year]] ended 30 June 2013 was presented on 8 May 2012 by the [[Treasurer of Australia]], [[Wayne Swan]], the fifth federal budget presented by Swan, and the second budget of the [[Gillard Government]]. The budget was described as a "battlers" budget with benefits geared towards families and low income earners. It forecasts a surplus of $1.5 billion by 30 June 2013.
The '''2012 Australian federal budget''' for the [[Fiscal year#Australia|Australian financial year]] ended 30 June 2013 was presented on 8 May 2012 by the [[Treasurer of Australia]], [[Wayne Swan]], the fifth [[Australian federal budget|federal budget]] presented by Swan, and the second budget of the [[Gillard government]]. The budget was described as a "battlers" budget with benefits geared towards families and low income earners. It forecast a surplus of $1.5 billion in the financial year ended 30 June 2013.


The [[Gillard Government]] has emphasised the importance of returning the budget to a surplus so that the [[Reserve Bank of Australia]] may be in a better position to cut interest rates and thereby generate positive [[consumer sentiment]]. Swan was at pains to emphasise that the Bank would set rates independently. Swan had also stated it important for the confidence of sovereign debt investors following the [[2007–2012 global financial crisis]].<ref name="sps">{{Cite news |url=http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-04-29/swan-plans-savings-with-australia-tax-a-150-billion-short |title=Swan Plans Savings With Australia Tax A$150 Billion Short |author=David Fickling |accessdate=30 April 2012 |date=29 April 2012 |work=Bloomberg News |publisher=Bloomberg L.P. }}</ref>
The Gillard government emphasised the importance of returning the budget to a surplus so that the [[Reserve Bank of Australia]] may be in a better position to cut interest rates and thereby generate positive [[consumer sentiment]]. Swan was at pains to emphasise that the Bank would set rates independently. Swan had also stated it important for the confidence of sovereign debt investors following the [[2007–2008 financial crisis]].<ref name="sps">{{Cite news |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-04-29/swan-plans-savings-with-australia-tax-a150-billion-short | title=Swan Plans Savings With Australia Tax A$150 Billion Short |first=David | last=Fickling | date=29 April 2012 |work=[[Bloomberg News]] |publisher=[[Bloomberg L.P.]] | url-access=subscription | archive-url=https://archive.today/20130118140944/http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-04-29/swan-plans-savings-with-australia-tax-a-150-billion-short |archive-date=18 January 2013 |url-status=live}}</ref>


The budget set up funding for a new [[National Disability Insurance Scheme]] (NDIS). Measures to improve public dental health care, one of the conditions of support made by the [[Australian Greens]] with the Gillard Government were addressed with more than $500&nbsp;million worth of funding.<ref name="bdd"/> [[Carbon pricing in Australia|Carbon pricing]] and the [[Minerals Resource Rent Tax]] were both introduced in July 2012.
The budget set up funding for a new [[National Disability Insurance Scheme]] (NDIS). Measures to improve public dental health care, one of the conditions of support made by the [[Australian Greens]] with the Gillard government were addressed with more than $500&nbsp;million worth of funding.<ref name="bdd"/> [[Carbon pricing in Australia|Carbon pricing]] and the [[Minerals Resource Rent Tax]] were both introduced in July 2012.


==Forecasts==
==Forecasts==


===Surplus===
===Surplus===
The budget was expected to produce a [[Economic surplus|surplus]].<ref name="lvcb">{{Cite news |url=http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/labor-values-centre-of-budget-bradbury-20120501-1xw6b.html |title=Labor values centre of budget: Bradbury |accessdate=1 May 2012 |date=1 May 2012 |newspaper=Sydney Morning Herald |publisher=Fairfax Media }}</ref> The return to surplus has been criticised as a political imperative rather than an economic necessity. The [[Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia|Institute of Chartered Accountants]] believes that targeted public expenditure was still needed to sustain the Australian economy.<ref name="sens">{{Cite news |url=http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/support-economy-not-surplus-accountants-20120501-1xwar.html |title=Support economy, not surplus: accountants |accessdate=1 May 2012 |date=1 May 2012 |newspaper=Sydney Morning Herald |publisher=Fairfax Media }}</ref> Former Governor of the [[Reserve Bank of Australia]], [[Bernie Fraser (economist)|Bernie Fraser]] has dismissed the notion that delivering a surplus is critical, describing it as "a dud policy".<ref name="frta">{{Cite news |url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-04-30/fraser-disillusioned-with-australian-politics/3980874 |title=Fraser takes aim at both sides of politics |author=Stephen Long |accessdate=1 May 2012 |date=1 May 2012 |work=ABC News |publisher=Australian Broadcasting Corporation }}</ref>
The budget was expected to produce a [[Economic surplus|surplus]].<ref name="lvcb">{{Cite news |url=http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/labor-values-centre-of-budget-bradbury-20120501-1xw6b.html |title=Labor values centre of budget: Bradbury |access-date=1 May 2012 |date=1 May 2012 |newspaper=The Sydney Morning Herald }}</ref> The return to surplus has been criticised as a political imperative rather than an economic necessity. The [[Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia|Institute of Chartered Accountants]] believes that targeted public expenditure was still needed to sustain the Australian economy.<ref name="sens">{{Cite news |url=http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/support-economy-not-surplus-accountants-20120501-1xwar.html |title=Support economy, not surplus: accountants |access-date=1 May 2012 |date=1 May 2012 |newspaper=The Sydney Morning Herald }}</ref> Former Governor of the [[Reserve Bank of Australia]], [[Bernie Fraser (economist)|Bernie Fraser]] has dismissed the notion that delivering a surplus is critical, describing it as "a dud policy".<ref name="frta">{{Cite news |url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-04-30/fraser-disillusioned-with-australian-politics/3980874 |title=Fraser takes aim at both sides of politics |author=Stephen Long |access-date=1 May 2012 |date=1 May 2012 |work=ABC News }}</ref>


The surplus follows a projected $44&nbsp;billion deficit for the 2011/12 financial year, up from the previous estimate of $36 billion. By abolishing the [[Education Tax Refund]] and bringing forward payments to families into the 2011/12 fiscal year, the Government was able to forecast its surplus for 2012/13.<ref name="gdb">{{Cite news |url=http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/gillard-defends-budget-surplus-plan-20120419-1x82t.html |title=Gillard defends budget surplus plan |author=Paul Osborne |accessdate=1 May 2012 |date=18 April 2012 |newspaper=Sydney Morning Herald |publisher=Fairfax Media }}</ref>
The surplus follows a projected $44&nbsp;billion deficit for the 2011/12 financial year, up from the previous estimate of $36&nbsp;billion. By abolishing the Education Tax Refund and bringing forward payments to families into the 2011/12 fiscal year, the Government was able to forecast its surplus for 2012/13.<ref name="gdb">{{Cite news |url=http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/gillard-defends-budget-surplus-plan-20120419-1x82t.html |title=Gillard defends budget surplus plan |author=Paul Osborne |access-date=1 May 2012 |date=18 April 2012 |newspaper=The Sydney Morning Herald }}</ref>


The 2011/12 expanded deficit moves the Government's net debt position to 9.6% of GDP.<ref>[http://www.budget.gov.au/2012-13/content/bp1/download/bp1.pdf Budget Paper No. 1: Budget Strategy and Outlook 2012‑13] Page 1-14</ref> Despite the spike in debt, the budget has not affected the nation's [[Bond credit rating|Triple A]] [[List of countries by credit rating|international credit rating]].
The 2011/12 expanded deficit moves the Government's net debt position to 9.6% of GDP.<ref>[http://www.budget.gov.au/2012-13/content/bp1/download/bp1.pdf Budget Paper No. 1: Budget Strategy and Outlook 2012‑13] Page 1-14</ref> Despite the spike in debt, the budget has not affected the nation's [[Bond credit rating|Triple A]] [[List of countries by credit rating|international credit rating]].


===Shortfall===
===Shortfall===
In October 2012, Wayne Swan announced a budget update which revealed revenue downgrades worth $21&nbsp;billion from projected tax revenue and $4 billion from the current financial year. Lower commodity prices and falling tax receipts reduced the current forecast surplus to $1.1&nbsp;billion.<ref name="swa">{{Cite news |url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-10-22/swan-wields-axe-to-protect-shrinking-surplus/4326498 |title=Swan wields axe to protect shrinking surplus |author=Simon Cullen |accessdate=24 November 2012 |date=22 October 2012 |work=ABC News |publisher=Australian Broadcasting Corporation }}</ref> Spot prices for iron ore, thermal coal and coking coal decreased by 15 to 35% since the budget was released in May.<ref name="bs21">{{Cite news |url=http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/opinion/political-news/budget-shock-21b-shortfall-20121019-27wqj.html |title=Budget shock: $21b shortfall |author=Peter Martin |accessdate=24 November 2012 |date=20 October 2012 |work=Brisbane Time |publisher=Fairfax Media }}</ref> The update also showed the cost of processing asylum seekers has increased by $1.1&nbsp;billion.
In October 2012, Wayne Swan announced a budget update which revealed revenue downgrades worth $21&nbsp;billion from projected tax revenue and $4&nbsp;billion from the current financial year. Lower commodity prices and falling tax receipts reduced the current forecast surplus to $1.1&nbsp;billion.<ref name="swa">{{Cite news |url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-10-22/swan-wields-axe-to-protect-shrinking-surplus/4326498 |title=Swan wields axe to protect shrinking surplus |author=Cullen |access-date=24 November 2012 |date=22 October 2012 |work=ABC News }}</ref> Spot prices for iron ore, thermal coal and coking coal decreased by 15 to 35% since the budget was released in May.<ref name="bs21">{{Cite news |url=http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/opinion/political-news/budget-shock-21b-shortfall-20121019-27wqj.html |title=Budget shock: $21b shortfall |author=Peter Martin |access-date=24 November 2012 |date=20 October 2012 |work=Brisbane Time }}</ref> The update also showed the cost of processing asylum seekers has increased by $1.1&nbsp;billion.


New spending cuts and extra charges worth $16&nbsp;billion were announced. Visa application fees will increase, the baby bonus payment will decrease for second and subsequent children and the Medicare teen dental program was cancelled.<ref name="swa"/> Starting in 2014 companies with an annual turnover greater than $1&nbsp;billion will have to pay tax in monthly instalments instead of quarterly.<ref name="sts">{{Cite news |url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-10-22/tax-shakeup-puts-business-offside/4327340 |title=Swan's tax shakeup puts business offside |author=Simon Cullen |accessdate=24 November 2012 |date=23 October 2012 |work=ABC News |publisher=Australian Broadcasting Corporation }}</ref>
New spending cuts and extra charges worth $16&nbsp;billion were announced. Visa application fees will increase, the baby bonus payment will decrease for second and subsequent children and the Medicare teen dental program was cancelled.<ref name="swa"/> Starting in 2014 companies with an annual turnover greater than $1&nbsp;billion will have to pay tax in monthly instalments instead of quarterly.<ref name="sts">{{Cite news |url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-10-22/tax-shakeup-puts-business-offside/4327340 |title=Swan's tax shakeup puts business offside |author=Cullen |access-date=24 November 2012 |date=23 October 2012 |work=ABC News }}</ref>


==Revenue mix==
==Revenue mix==
Before the budget was released Swan had warned that the government revenues would see a downgrade by $5&nbsp;billion in both the 2012–13 and 2013–14 financial years.<ref name="ibhl">{{Cite news |url=http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/treasury/independents-budget-hard-line/story-fndbwnla-1226342167213 |title=Independents' budget hard line |author=Lauren Wilson |accessdate=30 April 2012 |date=30 April 2012 |newspaper=The Australian |publisher=News Limited }}</ref>
Before the budget was released Swan had warned that the government revenues would see a downgrade by $5&nbsp;billion in both the 2012–13 and 2013–14 financial years.<ref name="ibhl">{{Cite news |url=http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/treasury/independents-budget-hard-line/story-fndbwnla-1226342167213 |title=Independents' budget hard line |author=Lauren Wilson |access-date=30 April 2012 |date=30 April 2012 |newspaper=The Australian }}</ref>


===Taxation===
===Taxation===
$2&nbsp;billion worth of lost tax revenue was due to a decline in [[company taxation|company tax]] collections.<ref name="snts">{{Cite news |url=http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/swan-needs-to-save-10b-to-get-budget-in-surplus-20120429-1xt2a.html |title=Swan needs to save $10b to get budget in surplus |author=Peter Martin & Amy Corderoy |accessdate=30 April 2012 |date=30 April 2012 |newspaper=Sydney Morning Herald |publisher=Fairfax Media }}</ref> $1&nbsp;billion has been lost to weak collections from superannuation funds and a further $750 million of revenue was lost due to lower than expected collections of customs and excise duties.<ref name="ssf">{{Cite news |url=http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/swan-still-fishing-around-to-find-another-10bn-20120429-1xt3u.html |title=Swan still fishing around to find another $10bn |author=Peter Martin & Amy Corderoy |accessdate=30 April 2012 |date=30 April 2012 |newspaper=Sydney Morning Herald |publisher=Fairfax Media }}</ref>
$2&nbsp;billion worth of lost tax revenue was due to a decline in [[company taxation|company tax]] collections.<ref name="snts">{{Cite news |url=http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/swan-needs-to-save-10b-to-get-budget-in-surplus-20120429-1xt2a.html |title=Swan needs to save $10b to get budget in surplus |author=Peter Martin & Amy Corderoy |access-date=30 April 2012 |date=30 April 2012 |newspaper=The Sydney Morning Herald }}</ref> $1&nbsp;billion has been lost to weak collections from superannuation funds and a further $750&nbsp;million of revenue was lost due to lower than expected collections of customs and excise duties.<ref name="ssf">{{Cite news |url=http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/swan-still-fishing-around-to-find-another-10bn-20120429-1xt3u.html |title=Swan still fishing around to find another $10bn |author=Peter Martin & Amy Corderoy |access-date=30 April 2012 |date=30 April 2012 |newspaper=The Sydney Morning Herald }}</ref>


High income earners on $300,000 or more are to have their [[Superannuation in Australia|superannuation]] contributions taxed at 30% instead of 15%.<ref name="snts"/> The [[Minerals Resource Rent Tax]], a 30% tax on coal and iron ore companies worth more than $75&nbsp;million, is being introduced. It is expected to generate $11&nbsp;billion over three years, which will be used to support superannuation boosts, infrastructure costs and offset business tax cuts.<ref name="bmaa">{{Cite news |url=http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/business/federal-budget/budget-measures-already-announced-20120507-1y7vi.html |title=Budget measures already announced |author=Jessica Wright |accessdate=7 May 2012 |date=7 May 2012 |work=Brisbane Times |publisher=Fairfax Media }}</ref> Small business tax was expected to be reduced by 1% from 1 July.<ref name="bmaa"/> However this measure was abandoned.<ref name="bgm">{{Cite news |url=http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/business/federal-budget/budget-gifts-mining-boom-to-families-20120508-1yb0v.html |title=Budget gifts mining boom to families |author=Jessica Wright |accessdate=8 May 2012 |date=8 May 2012 |work=Brisbane Times |publisher=Fairfax Media }}</ref>
High income earners on $300,000 or more are to have their [[Superannuation in Australia|superannuation]] contributions taxed at 30% instead of 15%.<ref name="snts"/> The [[Minerals Resource Rent Tax]], a 30% tax on coal and iron ore companies worth more than $75&nbsp;million, is being introduced. It is expected to generate $11&nbsp;billion over three years, which will be used to support superannuation boosts, infrastructure costs and offset business tax cuts.<ref name="bmaa">{{Cite news |url=http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/business/federal-budget/budget-measures-already-announced-20120507-1y7vi.html |title=Budget measures already announced |author=Jessica Wright |access-date=7 May 2012 |date=7 May 2012 |work=Brisbane Times }}</ref> Small business tax was expected to be reduced by 1% from 1 July.<ref name="bmaa"/> However this measure was abandoned.<ref name="bgm">{{Cite news |url=http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/business/federal-budget/budget-gifts-mining-boom-to-families-20120508-1yb0v.html |title=Budget gifts mining boom to families |author=Jessica Wright |access-date=8 May 2012 |date=8 May 2012 |work=Brisbane Times }}</ref>


The budget will introduce a small business "loss carryback" option as recommended by the [[Henry Tax Review]].<ref name="fbw">{{Cite news |url=http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/business/federal-budget/federal-budget--what-we-know-so-far-20120507-1y8m0.html |title=Federal budget - what we know so far |author=Madeleine Heffernan |accessdate=7 May 2012 |date=7 May 2012 |work=Brisbane Times |publisher=Fairfax Media }}</ref> This will allow businesses to claim losses of up to $1&nbsp;million against tax they have paid previously and will cost $700&nbsp;million across three years.
The budget will introduce a small business "loss carryback" option as recommended by the [[Henry Tax Review]].<ref name="fbw">{{Cite news |url=http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/business/federal-budget/federal-budget--what-we-know-so-far-20120507-1y8m0.html |title=Federal budget what we know so far |author=Madeleine Heffernan |access-date=7 May 2012 |date=7 May 2012 |work=Brisbane Times }}</ref> This will allow businesses to claim losses of up to $1&nbsp;million against tax they have paid previously and will cost $700&nbsp;million across three years.


The inbound duty-free allowance for cigarettes and tobacco was reduced from 250 to 50 cigarettes, bringing savings of $600&nbsp;million.<ref name="bgm"/>
The inbound duty-free allowance for cigarettes and tobacco was reduced from 250 to 50 cigarettes, bringing savings of $600&nbsp;million.<ref name="bgm"/>
Line 68: Line 68:


===General government===
===General government===
The cost for managing asylum seeker boat arrivals has increased to $1.003&nbsp;billion from an earlier estimate of $739&nbsp;million.<ref name="fbi">{{Cite news |url=http://www.skynews.com.au/national/article.aspx?id=748247&vId= |title=Fresh blowout in asylum seeker costs |author= |accessdate=9 May 2012 |date=8 May 2012 |work=Sky News Australia |publisher=Australian News Channel }}</ref> The number of asylum seekers entering Australia by boat is currently at its highest level ever.
The cost for managing asylum seeker boat arrivals has increased to $1.003&nbsp;billion from an earlier estimate of $739&nbsp;million.<ref name="fbi">{{Cite news |url=http://www.skynews.com.au/national/article.aspx?id=748247&vId= |title=Fresh blowout in asylum seeker costs |access-date=9 May 2012 |date=8 May 2012 |work=Sky News Australia |publisher=Australian News Channel }}</ref> The number of asylum seekers entering Australia by boat is currently at its highest level ever.


Funding for the [[Australian Bureau of Statistics]] is being reduced by $255 million and the CSIRO is set to lose $25 million.<ref name="balo"/> Smaller cuts are also planned for the [[Australian National Library]], [[National Film and Sound Archive]] and the [[National Museum of Australia]].<ref name="balo"/>
Funding for the [[Australian Bureau of Statistics]] is being reduced by $255&nbsp;million and the CSIRO is set to lose $25&nbsp;million.<ref name="balo"/> Smaller cuts are also planned for the [[Australian National Library]], [[National Film and Sound Archive]] and the [[National Museum of Australia]].<ref name="balo"/>


===Social security and welfare===
===Social security and welfare===
The budget allocated $131.6&nbsp;billion to social security and welfare spending.<ref name="gwb">{{Cite news |url=http://www.news.com.au/money/federal-budget/welfare-budget-costing-5000-a-head/story-fn84fgcm-1226351467594 |title=Government's welfare budget costs $5000 a head |author=Phillip Hudson |accessdate=20 August 2012 |date=10 May 2012 |newspaper=The Daily Telegraph |publisher=News Limited }}</ref> On 30 April 2012, Julia Gillard announced the budget will fund the National Disability Insurance Scheme starting from July 2013.<ref name="gtf">{{Cite news |url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-04-30/gillard-announces-disability-insurance-scheme/3980662?section=nsw |title=Government to fund disability insurance scheme |accessdate=30 April 2012 |date=30 April 2012 |work=ABC News |publisher=Australian Broadcasting Corporation }}</ref> The scheme is planned to assist 10,000 people with significant and permanent disabilities.
The budget allocated $131.6&nbsp;billion to social security and welfare spending.<ref name="gwb">{{Cite news |url=http://www.news.com.au/money/federal-budget/welfare-budget-costing-5000-a-head/story-fn84fgcm-1226351467594 |title=Government's welfare budget costs $5000 a head |author=Phillip Hudson |access-date=20 August 2012 |date=10 May 2012 |newspaper=The Daily Telegraph }}</ref> On 30 April 2012, Julia Gillard announced the budget will fund the National Disability Insurance Scheme starting from July 2013.<ref name="gtf">{{Cite news |url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-04-30/gillard-announces-disability-insurance-scheme/3980662?section=nsw |title=Government to fund disability insurance scheme |access-date=30 April 2012 |date=30 April 2012 |work=ABC News }}</ref> The scheme is planned to assist 10,000 people with significant and permanent disabilities.


From July 2013, single, unemployed parents who claimed the parenting payment before 2007 will lose their parenting support payments when their youngest child turns eight, instead of the previous threshold of age sixteen.<ref name="tlb">{{Cite news |url=http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/money/tough-love-budget-targets-single-parents-to-save-700m/story-fn84geaj-1226346302653 |title=Tough Love: Budget targets single parents to save $700m |author=Simon Benson |accessdate=4 May 2012 |date=3 May 2012 |newspaper=The Daily Telegraph |publisher=News Limited }}</ref> Welfare recipients who travel overseas for more than six weeks will have their payments reduced.<ref name="fbw"/>
From July 2013, single, unemployed parents who claimed the parenting payment before 2007 will lose their parenting support payments when their youngest child turns eight, instead of the previous threshold of age sixteen.<ref name="tlb">{{Cite news |url=http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/money/tough-love-budget-targets-single-parents-to-save-700m/story-fn84geaj-1226346302653 |title=Tough Love: Budget targets single parents to save $700m |author=Benson |access-date=4 May 2012 |date=3 May 2012 |newspaper=The Daily Telegraph }}</ref> Welfare recipients who travel overseas for more than six weeks will have their payments reduced.<ref name="fbw"/>


1.5&nbsp;million families will see an increase family tax benefits starting from 1 July.<ref name="bbf"/> Other families will lose Family Tax Benefit A because the eligibility age for children in this category is being reduced from 21 to under 18.
1.5&nbsp;million families will see an increase family tax benefits starting from 1 July.<ref name="bbf"/> Other families will lose Family Tax Benefit A because the eligibility age for children in this category is being reduced from 21 to under 18.


===Infrastructure, transport and energy===
===Infrastructure, transport and energy===
$3.56&nbsp;billion is being spent on the complete duplication of the [[Pacific Highway (Australia)|Pacific Highway]].<ref name="bmaa"/> The funding is being provided on the condition that a similar figure is spent on the highway by the New South Wales government.<ref name="fcl">{{Cite news |url=http://www.smh.com.au/business/federal-budget/funding-clash-looms-over-pacific-highway-20120509-1yd5a.html |title=Funding clash looms over Pacific Highway |author=Sean Nicholls |accessdate=10 July 2012 |date=10 May 2012 |newspaper=Sydney Morning Herald |publisher=Fairfax Media }}</ref> [[Minister for Roads and Ports (New South Wales)|Minister for Roads and Ports]], [[Duncan Gay]] has claimed there was an existing agreement based on an 80–20 funding split. The New South Wales state budget, which was handed down in June 2012, only allocated 20% of the cost for an upgrade.<ref name="sf2">{{Cite news |url=http://www.abc.net.au/local/stories/2012/06/12/3523501.htm |title=State funds 20 per cent of Pacific Highway upgrade |author=Bruce MacKenzie & Samantha Turnbull |accessdate=10 July 2012 |date=12 June 2012 |work=ABC North Coast NSW |publisher=Australian Broadcasting Corporation }}</ref>
$3.56&nbsp;billion is being spent on the complete duplication of the [[Pacific Highway (Australia)|Pacific Highway]].<ref name="bmaa"/> The funding is being provided on the condition that a similar figure is spent on the highway by the New South Wales government.<ref name="fcl">{{Cite news |url=http://www.smh.com.au/business/federal-budget/funding-clash-looms-over-pacific-highway-20120509-1yd5a.html |title=Funding clash looms over Pacific Highway |author=Sean Nicholls |access-date=10 July 2012 |date=10 May 2012 |newspaper=The Sydney Morning Herald }}</ref> [[Minister for Roads and Ports (New South Wales)|Minister for Roads and Ports]], [[Duncan Gay]] has claimed there was an existing agreement based on an 80–20 funding split. The New South Wales state budget, which was handed down in June 2012, only allocated 20% of the cost for an upgrade.<ref name="sf2">{{Cite news |url=http://www.abc.net.au/local/stories/2012/06/12/3523501.htm |title=State funds 20 per cent of Pacific Highway upgrade |author=Bruce MacKenzie & Samantha Turnbull |access-date=10 July 2012 |date=12 June 2012 |work=ABC North Coast NSW |publisher=Australian Broadcasting Corporation }}</ref>


===Education===
===Education===
The budget is introducing the Schoolkids Bonus, a replacement for the under-utilized Education Tax Refund. Under the scheme, eligible families are able to claim $820 for each high school student and $410 for each primary school student.<ref name="fos">{{Cite news |url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-05-06/families-of-school-kids-in-line-for-budget-boost/3993816 |title=Families of school kids in line for budget boost |accessdate=6 May 2012 |date=6 May 2012 |work=ABC News |publisher=Australian Broadcasting Corporation }}</ref> The bonus is expected to assist 2.2 million families.<ref name="bbf">{{Cite news |url=http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/business/federal-budget/benefits-boost-for-15-million-middle-income-families-20120508-1yb8v.html |title=Benefits boost for 1.5 million middle- income families |author= |accessdate=9 May 2012 |date=8 May 2012 |work=Brisbane Times |publisher=Fairfax Media }}</ref>
The budget is introducing the Schoolkids Bonus, a replacement for the under-used Education Tax Refund. Under the scheme, eligible families are able to claim $820 for each high school student and $410 for each primary school student.<ref name="fos">{{Cite news |url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-05-06/families-of-school-kids-in-line-for-budget-boost/3993816 |title=Families of school kids in line for budget boost |access-date=6 May 2012 |date=6 May 2012 |work=ABC News }}</ref> The bonus is expected to assist 2.2&nbsp;million families.<ref name="bbf">{{Cite news |url=http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/business/federal-budget/benefits-boost-for-15-million-middle-income-families-20120508-1yb8v.html |title=Benefits boost for 1.5&nbsp;million middle- income families |access-date=9 May 2012 |date=8 May 2012 |work=Brisbane Times }}</ref>


$11.7 million worth of funding has been allocated for a one-off boost to the [[One Laptop Per Child]] in Australia, which will provide laptops for 50,000 students.<ref name="olpc">{{Cite news |url=http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/424025/one_laptop_per_child_australia_scores_11_7m_federal_budget/?fp=4&fpid=1968336438 |title=One Laptop per Child Australia scores $11.7m in federal budget |author=Rohan Pearce |accessdate=9 May 2012 |date=9 May 2012 |work=Computerworld |publisher=IDG Communications }}</ref>
$11.7&nbsp;million worth of funding has been allocated for a one-off boost to the [[One Laptop Per Child]] in Australia, which will provide laptops for 50,000 students.<ref name="olpc">{{Cite news |url=http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/424025/one_laptop_per_child_australia_scores_11_7m_federal_budget/?fp=4&fpid=1968336438 |title=One Laptop per Child Australia scores $11.7m in federal budget |author=Rohan Pearce |access-date=9 May 2012 |date=9 May 2012 |work=Computerworld |publisher=IDG Communications }}</ref>


===Defence===
===Defence===
More than $4 billion of spending on defence projects is being reduced or deferred.<ref name="4bs">{{Cite news |url=http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/treasury/bn-stripped-from-defence/story-fndbwnla-1226346325432 |title=$4bn stripped from Defence |author=Brendan Nicholson |accessdate=4 May 2012 |date=4 May 2012 |newspaper=The Australian |publisher=News Limited }}</ref> The purchase of 12 [[Joint Strike Fighter]]s will be delayed by two years and plans to equip the army with [[self-propelled artillery]] have been cancelled.<ref name="rod">{{Cite news |url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-05-03/defence-white-paper-now-due-in-2013/3987042 |title=Rethink of Defence projects to save billions |author=Sabra Lane |accessdate=3 May 2012 |date=3 May 2012 |work=ABC News |publisher=Australian Broadcasting Corporation }}</ref>
More than $4&nbsp;billion of spending on defence projects is being reduced or deferred.<ref name="4bs">{{Cite news |url=http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/treasury/bn-stripped-from-defence/story-fndbwnla-1226346325432 |title=$4bn stripped from Defence |author=Brendan Nicholson |access-date=4 May 2012 |date=4 May 2012 |newspaper=The Australian }}</ref> The purchase of 12 [[Joint Strike Fighter]]s will be delayed by two years and plans to equip the army with [[self-propelled artillery]] have been cancelled.<ref name="rod">{{Cite news |url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-05-03/defence-white-paper-now-due-in-2013/3987042 |title=Rethink of Defence projects to save billions |author=Sabra Lane |access-date=3 May 2012 |date=3 May 2012 |work=ABC News }}</ref>


There is $214&nbsp;million worth of funding for a number of international studies to select a new submarine to replace the [[Collins class submarine]]s.<ref name="4bs"/>
There is $214&nbsp;million worth of funding for a number of international studies to select a new submarine to replace the [[Collins class submarine]]s.<ref name="4bs"/>
1,000 civilian positions at the [[Department of Defence (Australia)|Department of Defence]] are to be trimmed over the next four years.<ref name="btb">{{Cite news |url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-05-08/swan-hands-down-2012-budget/3998806 |title=Back to black as Swan budgets for the boom |author=Simon Cullen |accessdate=8 May 2012 |date=8 May 2012 |work=ABC News |publisher=Australian Broadcasting Corporation }}</ref>
1,000 civilian positions at the [[Department of Defence (Australia)|Department of Defence]] are to be trimmed over the next four years.<ref name="btb">{{Cite news |url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-05-08/swan-hands-down-2012-budget/3998806 |title=Back to black as Swan budgets for the boom |author=Cullen |access-date=8 May 2012 |date=8 May 2012 |work=ABC News }}</ref>


===Health===
===Health===
The public dental waiting list is being targeted with an injection of $345&nbsp;million to reduce the backlog.<ref name="sbw">{{Cite news |url=http://www.theage.com.au/business/federal-budget/stringent-budget-will-show-some-teeth-20120505-1y5zv.html |title=Stringent budget will show some teeth |accessdate=6 May 2012 |date=6 May 2012 |newspaper=The Age |publisher=Fairfax Media }}</ref> Also being introduced in the budget are measures to reduce the lack of dental healthcare professionals in rural and remote areas and the coordination of dental work for disadvantaged people.<ref name="bdd">{{Cite news |url=http://www.canberratimes.com.au/national/health/budget-drills-deep-to-shorten-dental-queues-20120505-1y5nx.html |title=Budget drills deep to shorten dental queues |author=Stephanie Peatling |accessdate=6 May 2012 |date=6 May 2012 |newspaper=The Canberra Times |publisher=Fairfax Media }}</ref>
The public dental waiting list is being targeted with an injection of $345&nbsp;million to reduce the backlog.<ref name="sbw">{{Cite news |url=http://www.theage.com.au/business/federal-budget/stringent-budget-will-show-some-teeth-20120505-1y5zv.html |title=Stringent budget will show some teeth |access-date=6 May 2012 |date=6 May 2012 |newspaper=The Age }}</ref> Also being introduced in the budget are measures to reduce the lack of dental healthcare professionals in rural and remote areas and the co-ordination of dental work for disadvantaged people.<ref name="bdd">{{Cite news |url=http://www.canberratimes.com.au/national/health/budget-drills-deep-to-shorten-dental-queues-20120505-1y5nx.html |title=Budget drills deep to shorten dental queues |author=Stephanie Peatling |access-date=6 May 2012 |date=6 May 2012 |newspaper=The Canberra Times }}</ref>


A 2011 report from the [[Productivity Commission]] suggested the aged care sector needed drastic reform and an investment plan to deal with a rapidly aging population.<ref name="acop">{{Cite news |url=http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/capital-circle/aged-care-overhaul-protects-family-home/story-fn59nqgy-1226333964776 |title=Aged-care overhaul protects family home |author=James Massola |accessdate=10 July 2012 |date=20 April 2012 |newspaper=The Australian |publisher=News Limited }}</ref> The budget included $3.7&nbsp;billion to reform the aged care system.<ref name="baag">{{cite web |url=http://www.budget.gov.au/2012-13/content/at_a_glance/html/at_a_glance.htm |title=2012-13 Commonwealth Budget - Budget at a Glance |publisher=Australian Government |accessdate=10 July 2012 }}</ref> Only $577&nbsp;million of this is new funding spread across five years.<ref name="dacf">{{Cite news |url=http://www.canberratimes.com.au/breaking-news-national/dental-aged-care-focus-of-health-budget-20120508-1yb2p.html#ixzz20B0wLNTo |title=Dental, aged care focus of health budget |author=Julian Drape |accessdate=10 July 2012 |date=8 May 2012 |work=The Canberra Times |publisher=Fairfax Media }}</ref> $49.7&nbsp;million has been allocated to support the national bowel cancer screening program.<ref name="dacf"/>
A 2011 report from the [[Productivity Commission]] suggested the aged care sector needed drastic reform and an investment plan to deal with a rapidly ageing population.<ref name="acop">{{Cite news |url=http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/capital-circle/aged-care-overhaul-protects-family-home/story-fn59nqgy-1226333964776 |title=Aged-care overhaul protects family home |author=James Massola |access-date=10 July 2012 |date=20 April 2012 |newspaper=The Australian }}</ref> The budget included $3.7&nbsp;billion to reform the aged care system.<ref name="baag">{{cite web |url=http://www.budget.gov.au/2012-13/content/at_a_glance/html/at_a_glance.htm |title=2012–13 Commonwealth Budget Budget at a Glance |publisher=Australian Government |access-date=10 July 2012 }}</ref> Only $577&nbsp;million of this is new funding spread across five years.<ref name="dacf">{{Cite news |url=http://www.canberratimes.com.au/breaking-news-national/dental-aged-care-focus-of-health-budget-20120508-1yb2p.html |title=Dental, aged care focus of health budget |author=Julian Drape |access-date=10 July 2012 |date=8 May 2012 |work=The Canberra Times }}</ref> $49.7&nbsp;million has been allocated to support the national bowel cancer screening program.<ref name="dacf"/>


===Community services and culture===
===Community services and culture===
$63&nbsp;million is being provided to SBS for the production of a new free-to-air national Indigenous television channel.<ref name="sgf">{{Cite news |url=http://www.abc.net.au/rural/news/content/201205/s3498395.htm |title=SBS gets funds for Indigenous TV channel |author=Tony Allan |accessdate=9 May 2012 |date=8 May 2012 |work=ABC Rural |publisher=Australian Broadcasting Corporation }}</ref>
$63&nbsp;million is being provided to SBS for the production of a new free-to-air national Indigenous television channel.<ref name="sgf">{{Cite news |url=http://www.abc.net.au/rural/news/content/201205/s3498395.htm |title=SBS gets funds for Indigenous TV channel |author=Tony Allan |access-date=9 May 2012 |date=8 May 2012 |work=ABC Rural |publisher=Australian Broadcasting Corporation }}</ref>


==Opposition and crossbench response==
==Opposition and crossbench response==
Shadow treasurer [[Joe Hockey]] has said the surplus was created by "cooking the books"<ref name="bgm"/> and that it was confused. [[Tony Abbott]] was troubled by the debt ceiling being raised to $300&nbsp;billion and said that a surplus was only the result of forward spending.<ref name="fbsc">{{Cite news |url=http://www.heraldsun.com.au/money/federal-budget-surplus-a-charade-says-tony-abbott/story-fn84gmep-1226350697646 |title=Federal Budget surplus a charade, says Tony Abbott |accessdate=9 May 2012 |date=9 May 2012 |newspaper=Herald Sun }}</ref>
Shadow treasurer [[Joe Hockey]] has said the surplus was created by "cooking the books"<ref name="bgm"/> and that it was confused. [[Tony Abbott]] was troubled by the debt ceiling being raised to $300&nbsp;billion and said that a surplus was only the result of forward spending.<ref name="fbsc">{{Cite news |url=http://www.heraldsun.com.au/money/federal-budget-surplus-a-charade-says-tony-abbott/story-fn84gmep-1226350697646 |title=Federal Budget surplus a charade, says Tony Abbott |access-date=9 May 2012 |date=9 May 2012 |newspaper=Herald Sun }}</ref>


==Reception==
==Reception==
Innes Willox from the [[Australian Industry Group]] claimed the budget undermined businesses ability to make long-term investments.<ref name="bgm"/> Jennifer Westacott at the [[Business Council of Australia]] appreciated a return to surplus but also wanted a comprehensive audit of government spending.<ref name="bgm"/> Brendan Lyon from Infrastructure Partnerships Australia described the budget as a "lost opportunity" and lamented that instead of directing funding to infrastructure projects, the budget directed funding to families.<ref name="balo">{{Cite news |url=http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/budget-a-lost-opportunity-for-infrastructure-20120508-1yb6x.html |title=Budget a 'lost opportunity' for infrastructure |author=Tony Moore |accessdate=9 May 2012 |date=9 May 2012 |work=Brisbane Times |publisher=Fairfax Media }}</ref>
[[Innes Willox]] from the [[Australian Industry Group]] claimed the budget undermined businesses ability to make long-term investments.<ref name="bgm"/> Jennifer Westacott at the [[Business Council of Australia]] appreciated a return to surplus but also wanted a comprehensive audit of government spending.<ref name="bgm"/> Brendan Lyon from Infrastructure Partnerships Australia described the budget as a "lost opportunity" and lamented that instead of directing funding to infrastructure projects, the budget directed funding to families.<ref name="balo">{{Cite news |url=http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/budget-a-lost-opportunity-for-infrastructure-20120508-1yb6x.html |title=Budget a 'lost opportunity' for infrastructure |author=Tony Moore |access-date=9 May 2012 |date=9 May 2012 |work=Brisbane Times }}</ref>


==See also==
==See also==
Line 121: Line 121:
[[Category:2012 in Australia|Federal budget]]
[[Category:2012 in Australia|Federal budget]]
[[Category:Australian budgets]]
[[Category:Australian budgets]]
[[Category:2012 budgets|Australian federal budget]]
[[Category:2012 government budgets|Australian federal budget]]
[[Category:Gillard Government]]
[[Category:Gillard government]]
[[Category:May 2012 events in Australia]]

Latest revision as of 06:46, 5 November 2024

 () Australian federal budget 2012–13
Submitted8 May 2012
Submitted toParliament of Australia
Parliament43rd
PartyAustralian Labor Party
TreasurerWayne Swan
Total revenue$376.1 billion
Total expenditures$376.3 billion
Surplus$1.5 billion (Forecast)
Websitehttp://www.budget.gov.au/2012-13/ 2012–13 Commonwealth Budget
Numbers in italics are projections.

The 2012 Australian federal budget for the Australian financial year ended 30 June 2013 was presented on 8 May 2012 by the Treasurer of Australia, Wayne Swan, the fifth federal budget presented by Swan, and the second budget of the Gillard government. The budget was described as a "battlers" budget with benefits geared towards families and low income earners. It forecast a surplus of $1.5 billion in the financial year ended 30 June 2013.

The Gillard government emphasised the importance of returning the budget to a surplus so that the Reserve Bank of Australia may be in a better position to cut interest rates and thereby generate positive consumer sentiment. Swan was at pains to emphasise that the Bank would set rates independently. Swan had also stated it important for the confidence of sovereign debt investors following the 2007–2008 financial crisis.[1]

The budget set up funding for a new National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS). Measures to improve public dental health care, one of the conditions of support made by the Australian Greens with the Gillard government were addressed with more than $500 million worth of funding.[2] Carbon pricing and the Minerals Resource Rent Tax were both introduced in July 2012.

Forecasts

[edit]

Surplus

[edit]

The budget was expected to produce a surplus.[3] The return to surplus has been criticised as a political imperative rather than an economic necessity. The Institute of Chartered Accountants believes that targeted public expenditure was still needed to sustain the Australian economy.[4] Former Governor of the Reserve Bank of Australia, Bernie Fraser has dismissed the notion that delivering a surplus is critical, describing it as "a dud policy".[5]

The surplus follows a projected $44 billion deficit for the 2011/12 financial year, up from the previous estimate of $36 billion. By abolishing the Education Tax Refund and bringing forward payments to families into the 2011/12 fiscal year, the Government was able to forecast its surplus for 2012/13.[6]

The 2011/12 expanded deficit moves the Government's net debt position to 9.6% of GDP.[7] Despite the spike in debt, the budget has not affected the nation's Triple A international credit rating.

Shortfall

[edit]

In October 2012, Wayne Swan announced a budget update which revealed revenue downgrades worth $21 billion from projected tax revenue and $4 billion from the current financial year. Lower commodity prices and falling tax receipts reduced the current forecast surplus to $1.1 billion.[8] Spot prices for iron ore, thermal coal and coking coal decreased by 15 to 35% since the budget was released in May.[9] The update also showed the cost of processing asylum seekers has increased by $1.1 billion.

New spending cuts and extra charges worth $16 billion were announced. Visa application fees will increase, the baby bonus payment will decrease for second and subsequent children and the Medicare teen dental program was cancelled.[8] Starting in 2014 companies with an annual turnover greater than $1 billion will have to pay tax in monthly instalments instead of quarterly.[10]

Revenue mix

[edit]

Before the budget was released Swan had warned that the government revenues would see a downgrade by $5 billion in both the 2012–13 and 2013–14 financial years.[11]

Taxation

[edit]

$2 billion worth of lost tax revenue was due to a decline in company tax collections.[12] $1 billion has been lost to weak collections from superannuation funds and a further $750 million of revenue was lost due to lower than expected collections of customs and excise duties.[13]

High income earners on $300,000 or more are to have their superannuation contributions taxed at 30% instead of 15%.[12] The Minerals Resource Rent Tax, a 30% tax on coal and iron ore companies worth more than $75 million, is being introduced. It is expected to generate $11 billion over three years, which will be used to support superannuation boosts, infrastructure costs and offset business tax cuts.[14] Small business tax was expected to be reduced by 1% from 1 July.[14] However this measure was abandoned.[15]

The budget will introduce a small business "loss carryback" option as recommended by the Henry Tax Review.[16] This will allow businesses to claim losses of up to $1 million against tax they have paid previously and will cost $700 million across three years.

The inbound duty-free allowance for cigarettes and tobacco was reduced from 250 to 50 cigarettes, bringing savings of $600 million.[15]

Expenditure mix

[edit]

General government

[edit]

The cost for managing asylum seeker boat arrivals has increased to $1.003 billion from an earlier estimate of $739 million.[17] The number of asylum seekers entering Australia by boat is currently at its highest level ever.

Funding for the Australian Bureau of Statistics is being reduced by $255 million and the CSIRO is set to lose $25 million.[18] Smaller cuts are also planned for the Australian National Library, National Film and Sound Archive and the National Museum of Australia.[18]

Social security and welfare

[edit]

The budget allocated $131.6 billion to social security and welfare spending.[19] On 30 April 2012, Julia Gillard announced the budget will fund the National Disability Insurance Scheme starting from July 2013.[20] The scheme is planned to assist 10,000 people with significant and permanent disabilities.

From July 2013, single, unemployed parents who claimed the parenting payment before 2007 will lose their parenting support payments when their youngest child turns eight, instead of the previous threshold of age sixteen.[21] Welfare recipients who travel overseas for more than six weeks will have their payments reduced.[16]

1.5 million families will see an increase family tax benefits starting from 1 July.[22] Other families will lose Family Tax Benefit A because the eligibility age for children in this category is being reduced from 21 to under 18.

Infrastructure, transport and energy

[edit]

$3.56 billion is being spent on the complete duplication of the Pacific Highway.[14] The funding is being provided on the condition that a similar figure is spent on the highway by the New South Wales government.[23] Minister for Roads and Ports, Duncan Gay has claimed there was an existing agreement based on an 80–20 funding split. The New South Wales state budget, which was handed down in June 2012, only allocated 20% of the cost for an upgrade.[24]

Education

[edit]

The budget is introducing the Schoolkids Bonus, a replacement for the under-used Education Tax Refund. Under the scheme, eligible families are able to claim $820 for each high school student and $410 for each primary school student.[25] The bonus is expected to assist 2.2 million families.[22]

$11.7 million worth of funding has been allocated for a one-off boost to the One Laptop Per Child in Australia, which will provide laptops for 50,000 students.[26]

Defence

[edit]

More than $4 billion of spending on defence projects is being reduced or deferred.[27] The purchase of 12 Joint Strike Fighters will be delayed by two years and plans to equip the army with self-propelled artillery have been cancelled.[28]

There is $214 million worth of funding for a number of international studies to select a new submarine to replace the Collins class submarines.[27] 1,000 civilian positions at the Department of Defence are to be trimmed over the next four years.[29]

Health

[edit]

The public dental waiting list is being targeted with an injection of $345 million to reduce the backlog.[30] Also being introduced in the budget are measures to reduce the lack of dental healthcare professionals in rural and remote areas and the co-ordination of dental work for disadvantaged people.[2]

A 2011 report from the Productivity Commission suggested the aged care sector needed drastic reform and an investment plan to deal with a rapidly ageing population.[31] The budget included $3.7 billion to reform the aged care system.[32] Only $577 million of this is new funding spread across five years.[33] $49.7 million has been allocated to support the national bowel cancer screening program.[33]

Community services and culture

[edit]

$63 million is being provided to SBS for the production of a new free-to-air national Indigenous television channel.[34]

Opposition and crossbench response

[edit]

Shadow treasurer Joe Hockey has said the surplus was created by "cooking the books"[15] and that it was confused. Tony Abbott was troubled by the debt ceiling being raised to $300 billion and said that a surplus was only the result of forward spending.[35]

Reception

[edit]

Innes Willox from the Australian Industry Group claimed the budget undermined businesses ability to make long-term investments.[15] Jennifer Westacott at the Business Council of Australia appreciated a return to surplus but also wanted a comprehensive audit of government spending.[15] Brendan Lyon from Infrastructure Partnerships Australia described the budget as a "lost opportunity" and lamented that instead of directing funding to infrastructure projects, the budget directed funding to families.[18]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Fickling, David (29 April 2012). "Swan Plans Savings With Australia Tax A$150 Billion Short". Bloomberg News. Bloomberg L.P. Archived from the original on 18 January 2013.
  2. ^ a b Stephanie Peatling (6 May 2012). "Budget drills deep to shorten dental queues". The Canberra Times. Retrieved 6 May 2012.
  3. ^ "Labor values centre of budget: Bradbury". The Sydney Morning Herald. 1 May 2012. Retrieved 1 May 2012.
  4. ^ "Support economy, not surplus: accountants". The Sydney Morning Herald. 1 May 2012. Retrieved 1 May 2012.
  5. ^ Stephen Long (1 May 2012). "Fraser takes aim at both sides of politics". ABC News. Retrieved 1 May 2012.
  6. ^ Paul Osborne (18 April 2012). "Gillard defends budget surplus plan". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 1 May 2012.
  7. ^ Budget Paper No. 1: Budget Strategy and Outlook 2012‑13 Page 1-14
  8. ^ a b Cullen (22 October 2012). "Swan wields axe to protect shrinking surplus". ABC News. Retrieved 24 November 2012.
  9. ^ Peter Martin (20 October 2012). "Budget shock: $21b shortfall". Brisbane Time. Retrieved 24 November 2012.
  10. ^ Cullen (23 October 2012). "Swan's tax shakeup puts business offside". ABC News. Retrieved 24 November 2012.
  11. ^ Lauren Wilson (30 April 2012). "Independents' budget hard line". The Australian. Retrieved 30 April 2012.
  12. ^ a b Peter Martin & Amy Corderoy (30 April 2012). "Swan needs to save $10b to get budget in surplus". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 30 April 2012.
  13. ^ Peter Martin & Amy Corderoy (30 April 2012). "Swan still fishing around to find another $10bn". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 30 April 2012.
  14. ^ a b c Jessica Wright (7 May 2012). "Budget measures already announced". Brisbane Times. Retrieved 7 May 2012.
  15. ^ a b c d e Jessica Wright (8 May 2012). "Budget gifts mining boom to families". Brisbane Times. Retrieved 8 May 2012.
  16. ^ a b Madeleine Heffernan (7 May 2012). "Federal budget – what we know so far". Brisbane Times. Retrieved 7 May 2012.
  17. ^ "Fresh blowout in asylum seeker costs". Sky News Australia. Australian News Channel. 8 May 2012. Retrieved 9 May 2012.
  18. ^ a b c Tony Moore (9 May 2012). "Budget a 'lost opportunity' for infrastructure". Brisbane Times. Retrieved 9 May 2012.
  19. ^ Phillip Hudson (10 May 2012). "Government's welfare budget costs $5000 a head". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 20 August 2012.
  20. ^ "Government to fund disability insurance scheme". ABC News. 30 April 2012. Retrieved 30 April 2012.
  21. ^ Benson (3 May 2012). "Tough Love: Budget targets single parents to save $700m". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 4 May 2012.
  22. ^ a b "Benefits boost for 1.5 million middle- income families". Brisbane Times. 8 May 2012. Retrieved 9 May 2012.
  23. ^ Sean Nicholls (10 May 2012). "Funding clash looms over Pacific Highway". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 10 July 2012.
  24. ^ Bruce MacKenzie & Samantha Turnbull (12 June 2012). "State funds 20 per cent of Pacific Highway upgrade". ABC North Coast NSW. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 10 July 2012.
  25. ^ "Families of school kids in line for budget boost". ABC News. 6 May 2012. Retrieved 6 May 2012.
  26. ^ Rohan Pearce (9 May 2012). "One Laptop per Child Australia scores $11.7m in federal budget". Computerworld. IDG Communications. Retrieved 9 May 2012.
  27. ^ a b Brendan Nicholson (4 May 2012). "$4bn stripped from Defence". The Australian. Retrieved 4 May 2012.
  28. ^ Sabra Lane (3 May 2012). "Rethink of Defence projects to save billions". ABC News. Retrieved 3 May 2012.
  29. ^ Cullen (8 May 2012). "Back to black as Swan budgets for the boom". ABC News. Retrieved 8 May 2012.
  30. ^ "Stringent budget will show some teeth". The Age. 6 May 2012. Retrieved 6 May 2012.
  31. ^ James Massola (20 April 2012). "Aged-care overhaul protects family home". The Australian. Retrieved 10 July 2012.
  32. ^ "2012–13 Commonwealth Budget – Budget at a Glance". Australian Government. Retrieved 10 July 2012.
  33. ^ a b Julian Drape (8 May 2012). "Dental, aged care focus of health budget". The Canberra Times. Retrieved 10 July 2012.
  34. ^ Tony Allan (8 May 2012). "SBS gets funds for Indigenous TV channel". ABC Rural. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 9 May 2012.
  35. ^ "Federal Budget surplus a charade, says Tony Abbott". Herald Sun. 9 May 2012. Retrieved 9 May 2012.