Presheaf with transfers: Difference between revisions
m →References: {{refbegin}} |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== Finite correspondence == |
== Finite correspondence == |
||
{{see also|Correspondence (algebraic geometry)}} |
{{see also|Correspondence (algebraic geometry)}} |
||
Let <math>X, Y</math> be algebraic schemes (i.e., separated and of finite type over a field) and suppose <math>X</math> is smooth. Then an '''elementary correspondence''' is an irreducible closed subscheme <math>W \subset X_i \times Y</math>, <math>X_i</math> some connected component of ''X'', such that the projection <math>\operatorname{Supp}(W) \to X_i</math> is finite and surjective.<ref>{{harvnb| |
Let <math>X, Y</math> be algebraic schemes (i.e., separated and of finite type over a field) and suppose <math>X</math> is smooth. Then an '''elementary correspondence''' is an irreducible closed subscheme <math>W \subset X_i \times Y</math>, <math>X_i</math> some connected component of ''X'', such that the projection <math>\operatorname{Supp}(W) \to X_i</math> is finite and surjective.<ref>{{harvnb|Mazza|Voevodsky|Weibel|2006|loc=Definition 1.1.}}</ref> Let <math>\operatorname{Cor}(X, Y)</math> be the free abelian group generated by elementary correspondences from ''X'' to ''Y''; elements of <math>\operatorname{Cor}(X, Y)</math> are then called '''finite correspondences'''. |
||
The category of finite correspondences, denoted by <math>Cor</math>, is the category where the objects are smooth algebraic schemes over a field; where a Hom set is given as: <math>\operatorname{Hom}(X, Y) = \operatorname{Cor}(X, Y)</math> |
The category of finite correspondences, denoted by <math>Cor</math>, is the category where the objects are smooth algebraic schemes over a field; where a Hom set is given as: <math>\operatorname{Hom}(X, Y) = \operatorname{Cor}(X, Y)</math> |
||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
=== Simplicial homology === |
=== Simplicial homology === |
||
There is a scheme<blockquote><math>\Delta^n = \text{Spec}\left( \frac{k[x_0,\ldots,x_n]}{\sum_{0 \leq i \leq n} x_i - 1} \right)</math></blockquote>giving a cosimplicial scheme <math>\Delta^*</math>, where the morphisms <math>\partial_j:\Delta^n \to \Delta^{n+1}</math> are given by <math>x_j = 0</math>. That is,<blockquote><math>\frac{k[x_0,\ldots,x_{n+1}]}{(\sum_{0 \leq i \leq n} x_i - 1)} \to \frac{k[x_0,\ldots,x_{n+1}]}{(\sum_{0 \leq i \leq n} x_i - 1, x_j)} </math></blockquote>gives the induced morphism <math>\partial_j</math>. Then, to a presheaf with transfers <math>F</math>, there is an associated complex of presheaves with transfers <math>C_*F</math> sending<blockquote><math>C_iF: U \mapsto F(U \times \Delta^i)</math></blockquote>and has the induced chain morphisms<blockquote><math>\sum_{i=0}^j (-1)^i \partial_i^*: C_jF \to C_{j-1}F</math></blockquote>giving a complex of presheaves with transfers. The homology |
There is a scheme<blockquote><math>\Delta^n = \text{Spec}\left( \frac{k[x_0,\ldots,x_n]}{\sum_{0 \leq i \leq n} x_i - 1} \right)</math></blockquote>giving a cosimplicial scheme <math>\Delta^*</math>, where the morphisms <math>\partial_j:\Delta^n \to \Delta^{n+1}</math> are given by <math>x_j = 0</math>. That is,<blockquote><math>\frac{k[x_0,\ldots,x_{n+1}]}{(\sum_{0 \leq i \leq n} x_i - 1)} \to \frac{k[x_0,\ldots,x_{n+1}]}{(\sum_{0 \leq i \leq n} x_i - 1, x_j)} </math></blockquote>gives the induced morphism <math>\partial_j</math>. Then, to a presheaf with transfers <math>F</math>, there is an associated complex of presheaves with transfers <math>C_*F</math> sending<blockquote><math>C_iF: U \mapsto F(U \times \Delta^i)</math></blockquote>and has the induced chain morphisms<blockquote><math>\sum_{i=0}^j (-1)^i \partial_i^*: C_jF \to C_{j-1}F</math></blockquote>giving a complex of presheaves with transfers. The homology invariant presheaves with transfers <math>H_i(C_*F)</math> are homotopy invariant. In particular, <math>H_0(C_*F)</math> is the universal homotopy invariant presheaf with transfers associated to <math>F</math>. |
||
==== Relation with Chow group of zero cycles ==== |
==== Relation with Chow group of zero cycles ==== |
Latest revision as of 21:57, 5 November 2024
In algebraic geometry, a presheaf with transfers is, roughly, a presheaf that, like cohomology theory, comes with pushforwards, “transfer” maps. Precisely, it is, by definition, a contravariant additive functor from the category of finite correspondences (defined below) to the category of abelian groups (in category theory, “presheaf” is another term for a contravariant functor).
When a presheaf F with transfers is restricted to the subcategory of smooth separated schemes, it can be viewed as a presheaf on the category with extra maps , not coming from morphisms of schemes but also from finite correspondences from X to Y
A presheaf F with transfers is said to be -homotopy invariant if for every X.
For example, Chow groups as well as motivic cohomology groups form presheaves with transfers.
Finite correspondence
[edit]Let be algebraic schemes (i.e., separated and of finite type over a field) and suppose is smooth. Then an elementary correspondence is an irreducible closed subscheme , some connected component of X, such that the projection is finite and surjective.[1] Let be the free abelian group generated by elementary correspondences from X to Y; elements of are then called finite correspondences.
The category of finite correspondences, denoted by , is the category where the objects are smooth algebraic schemes over a field; where a Hom set is given as: and where the composition is defined as in intersection theory: given elementary correspondences from to and from to , their composition is:
where denotes the intersection product and , etc. Note that the category is an additive category since each Hom set is an abelian group.
This category contains the category of smooth algebraic schemes as a subcategory in the following sense: there is a faithful functor that sends an object to itself and a morphism to the graph of .
With the product of schemes taken as the monoid operation, the category is a symmetric monoidal category.
Sheaves with transfers
[edit]The basic notion underlying all of the different theories are presheaves with transfers. These are contravariant additive functors
and their associated category is typically denoted , or just if the underlying field is understood. Each of the categories in this section are abelian categories, hence they are suitable for doing homological algebra.
Etale sheaves with transfers
[edit]These are defined as presheaves with transfers such that the restriction to any scheme is an etale sheaf. That is, if is an etale cover, and is a presheaf with transfers, it is an Etale sheaf with transfers if the sequence
is exact and there is an isomorphism
for any fixed smooth schemes .
Nisnevich sheaves with transfers
[edit]There is a similar definition for Nisnevich sheaf with transfers, where the Etale topology is switched with the Nisnevich topology.
Examples
[edit]Units
[edit]The sheaf of units is a presheaf with transfers. Any correspondence induces a finite map of degree over , hence there is the induced morphism
showing it is a presheaf with transfers.
Representable functors
[edit]One of the basic examples of presheaves with transfers are given by representable functors. Given a smooth scheme there is a presheaf with transfers sending .[2]
Representable functor associated to a point
[edit]The associated presheaf with transfers of is denoted .
Pointed schemes
[edit]Another class of elementary examples comes from pointed schemes with . This morphism induces a morphism whose cokernel is denoted . There is a splitting coming from the structure morphism , so there is an induced map , hence .
Representable functor associated to A1-0
[edit]There is a representable functor associated to the pointed scheme denoted .
Smash product of pointed schemes
[edit]Given a finite family of pointed schemes there is an associated presheaf with transfers , also denoted [2] from their Smash product. This is defined as the cokernel of
For example, given two pointed schemes , there is the associated presheaf with transfers equal to the cokernel of
This is analogous to the smash product in topology since where the equivalence relation mods out .
Wedge of single space
[edit]A finite wedge of a pointed space is denoted . One example of this construction is , which is used in the definition of the motivic complexes used in Motivic cohomology.
Homotopy invariant sheaves
[edit]A presheaf with transfers is homotopy invariant if the projection morphism induces an isomorphism for every smooth scheme . There is a construction associating a homotopy invariant sheaf[2] for every presheaf with transfers using an analogue of simplicial homology.
Simplicial homology
[edit]There is a scheme
giving a cosimplicial scheme , where the morphisms are given by . That is,
gives the induced morphism . Then, to a presheaf with transfers , there is an associated complex of presheaves with transfers sending
and has the induced chain morphisms
giving a complex of presheaves with transfers. The homology invariant presheaves with transfers are homotopy invariant. In particular, is the universal homotopy invariant presheaf with transfers associated to .
Relation with Chow group of zero cycles
[edit]Denote . There is an induced surjection which is an isomorphism for projective.
Zeroth homology of Ztr(X)
[edit]The zeroth homology of is where homotopy equivalence is given as follows. Two finite correspondences are -homotopy equivalent if there is a morphism such that and .
Motivic complexes
[edit]For Voevodsky's category of mixed motives, the motive associated to , is the class of in . One of the elementary motivic complexes are for , defined by the class of
For an abelian group , such as , there is a motivic complex . These give the motivic cohomology groups defined by
since the motivic complexes restrict to a complex of Zariksi sheaves of .[2] These are called the -th motivic cohomology groups of weight . They can also be extended to any abelian group ,
giving motivic cohomology with coefficients in of weight .
Special cases
[edit]There are a few special cases which can be analyzed explicitly. Namely, when . These results can be found in the fourth lecture of the Clay Math book.
Z(0)
[edit]In this case, which is quasi-isomorphic to (top of page 17),[2] hence the weight cohomology groups are isomorphic to
where . Since an open cover
Z(1)
[edit]This case requires more work, but the end result is a quasi-isomorphism between and . This gives the two motivic cohomology groups
where the middle cohomology groups are Zariski cohomology.
General case: Z(n)
[edit]In general, over a perfect field , there is a nice description of in terms of presheaves with transfer . There is a quasi-ismorphism
hence
which is found using splitting techniques along with a series of quasi-isomorphisms. The details are in lecture 15 of the Clay Math book.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- Mazza, Carlo; Voevodsky, Vladimir; Weibel, Charles (2006), Lecture notes on motivic cohomology, Clay Mathematics Monographs, vol. 2, Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Society, ISBN 978-0-8218-3847-1, MR 2242284