Presheaf with transfers: Difference between revisions
TakuyaMurata (talk | contribs) m →top |
No edit summary |
||
(25 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In algebraic geometry, a '''presheaf with transfers''' is, roughly, a [[presheaf (category theory)|presheaf]] that, like [[cohomology theory]], comes with pushforwards, “transfer” maps. Precisely, it is, by definition, a contravariant additive functor from the category of [[correspondence (algebraic geometry)|finite correspondence]]s (defined below) to the category of abelian groups (in [[category theory]], “presheaf” is another term for a contravariant functor). |
In [[algebraic geometry]], a '''presheaf with transfers''' is, roughly, a [[presheaf (category theory)|presheaf]] that, like [[cohomology theory]], comes with pushforwards, “transfer” maps. Precisely, it is, by definition, a contravariant additive functor from the category of [[correspondence (algebraic geometry)|finite correspondence]]s (defined below) to the category of abelian groups (in [[category theory]], “presheaf” is another term for a contravariant functor). |
||
When a presheaf ''F'' with transfers is restricted to the subcategory of smooth separated schemes, it can be viewed as a presheaf on the category with extra |
When a presheaf ''F'' with transfers is restricted to the subcategory of smooth separated schemes, it can be viewed as a presheaf on the category with ''extra'' maps <math>F(Y) \to F(X)</math>, not coming from [[morphism of schemes|morphisms of schemes]] but also from finite correspondences from ''X'' to ''Y'' |
||
A presheaf ''F'' with transfers is said to be [[A¹ homotopy theory|<math>\mathbb{A}^1</math>-homotopy invariant]] if <math>F(X) \simeq F(X \times \mathbb{A}^1)</math> for every ''X''. |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
== Finite correspondence == |
== Finite correspondence == |
||
⚫ | |||
Let <math>X, Y</math> be algebraic schemes (i.e., separated and of finite type over a field) and suppose <math>X</math> is smooth. Then an '''elementary correspondence''' is |
Let <math>X, Y</math> be algebraic schemes (i.e., separated and of finite type over a field) and suppose <math>X</math> is smooth. Then an '''elementary correspondence''' is an irreducible closed subscheme <math>W \subset X_i \times Y</math>, <math>X_i</math> some connected component of ''X'', such that the projection <math>\operatorname{Supp}(W) \to X_i</math> is finite and surjective.<ref>{{harvnb|Mazza|Voevodsky|Weibel|2006|loc=Definition 1.1.}}</ref> Let <math>\operatorname{Cor}(X, Y)</math> be the free abelian group generated by elementary correspondences from ''X'' to ''Y''; elements of <math>\operatorname{Cor}(X, Y)</math> are then called '''finite correspondences'''. |
||
The category of finite correspondences, denoted by <math>Cor</math>, is the category where the objects are smooth algebraic schemes over a field; where a Hom set is given as: <math>\operatorname{Hom}(X, Y) = \operatorname{Cor}(X, Y)</math> |
The category of finite correspondences, denoted by <math>Cor</math>, is the category where the objects are smooth algebraic schemes over a field; where a Hom set is given as: <math>\operatorname{Hom}(X, Y) = \operatorname{Cor}(X, Y)</math> |
||
Line 16: | Line 19: | ||
With the [[product of schemes]] taken as the monoid operation, the category <math>Cor</math> is a [[symmetric monoidal category]]. |
With the [[product of schemes]] taken as the monoid operation, the category <math>Cor</math> is a [[symmetric monoidal category]]. |
||
== Sheaves with transfers == |
|||
The basic notion underlying all of the different theories are '''presheaves with transfers'''. These are contravariant additive functors<blockquote><math>F:\text{Cor}_k \to \text{Ab}</math></blockquote>and their associated category is typically denoted <math>\mathbf{PST}(k)</math>, or just <math>\mathbf{PST}</math> if the underlying field is understood. Each of the categories in this section are abelian categories, hence they are suitable for doing homological algebra. |
|||
=== Etale sheaves with transfers === |
|||
These are defined as presheaves with transfers such that the restriction to any scheme <math>X</math> is an etale sheaf. That is, if <math>U \to X</math> is an etale cover, and <math>F</math> is a presheaf with transfers, it is an '''Etale sheaf with transfers''' if the sequence<blockquote><math>0 \to F(X) \xrightarrow{\text{diag}} F(U) \xrightarrow{(+,-)} F(U\times_XU)</math></blockquote>is exact and there is an isomorphism<blockquote><math>F(X\coprod Y) = F(X)\oplus F(Y)</math></blockquote>for any fixed smooth schemes <math>X,Y</math>. |
|||
=== Nisnevich sheaves with transfers === |
|||
There is a similar definition for '''Nisnevich sheaf with transfers''', where the Etale topology is switched with the Nisnevich topology. |
|||
== Examples == |
|||
=== Units === |
|||
The sheaf of units <math>\mathcal{O}^*</math> is a presheaf with transfers. Any correspondence <math>W \subset X \times Y</math> induces a finite map of degree <math>N</math> over <math>X</math>, hence there is the induced morphism<blockquote><math>\mathcal{O}^*(Y) \to \mathcal{O}^*(W) \xrightarrow{N} \mathcal{O}^*(X)</math><ref name=":0">{{Cite book|url=http://www.claymath.org/library/monographs/cmim02.pdf|title=Lecture Notes on Motivic Cohomology|publisher=Clay Math|pages=13,15-16,17,21,22}}</ref></blockquote>showing it is a presheaf with transfers. |
|||
=== Representable functors === |
|||
One of the basic examples of presheaves with transfers are given by representable functors. Given a smooth scheme <math>X</math> there is a presheaf with transfers <math>\mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X)</math> sending <math>U \mapsto \text{Hom}_{Cor}(U,X)</math>.<ref name=":0" /> |
|||
==== Representable functor associated to a point ==== |
|||
The associated presheaf with transfers of <math>\text{Spec}(k)</math> is denoted <math>\mathbb{Z}</math>. |
|||
=== Pointed schemes === |
|||
Another class of elementary examples comes from pointed schemes <math>(X,x)</math> with <math>x: \text{Spec}(k) \to X</math>. This morphism induces a morphism <math>x_*:\mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X)</math> whose cokernel is denoted <math>\mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X,x)</math>. There is a splitting coming from the structure morphism <math>X \to \text{Spec}(k)</math>, so there is an induced map <math>\mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X) \to \mathbb{Z}</math>, hence <math>\mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X) \cong \mathbb{Z}\oplus\mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X,x)</math>. |
|||
==== Representable functor associated to A<sup>1</sup>-0 ==== |
|||
There is a representable functor associated to the pointed scheme <math>\mathbb{G}_m = (\mathbb{A}^1-\{0\},1)</math> denoted <math>\mathbb{Z}_{tr}(\mathbb{G}_m)</math>. |
|||
=== Smash product of pointed schemes === |
|||
Given a finite family of pointed schemes <math>(X_i, x_i)</math> there is an associated presheaf with transfers <math>\mathbb{Z}_{tr}((X_1,x_1)\wedge\cdots\wedge(X_n,x_n))</math>, also denoted <math>\mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X_1\wedge\cdots\wedge X_n)</math><ref name=":0" /> from their [[Smash product]]. This is defined as the cokernel of<blockquote><math>\text{coker}\left( \bigoplus_i \mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X_1\times \cdots \times \hat{X}_i \times \cdots \times X_n) \xrightarrow{id\times \cdots \times x_i \times \cdots \times id} \mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X_1\times\cdots\times X_n) \right)</math></blockquote>For example, given two pointed schemes <math>(X,x),(Y,y)</math>, there is the associated presheaf with transfers <math>\mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X\wedge Y)</math> equal to the cokernel of<blockquote><math>\mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X)\oplus \mathbb{Z}_{tr}(Y) \xrightarrow{ \begin{bmatrix}1\times y & x\times 1 \end{bmatrix}} \mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X\times Y)</math><ref>Note <math>X \cong X\times \{ y\}</math> giving <math>\mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X\times\{y\}) \cong \mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X)</math></ref></blockquote>This is analogous to the smash product in topology since <math>X\wedge Y = (X \times Y) / (X \vee Y)</math> where the equivalence relation mods out <math>X\times \{y\} \cup \{x\}\times Y</math>. |
|||
==== Wedge of single space ==== |
|||
A finite wedge of a pointed space <math>(X,x)</math> is denoted <math>\mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X^{\wedge q}) = \mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X\wedge \cdots \wedge X)</math>. One example of this construction is <math>\mathbb{Z}_{tr}(\mathbb{G}_m^{\wedge q})</math>, which is used in the definition of the motivic complexes <math>\mathbb{Z}(q)</math> used in [[Motivic cohomology]]. |
|||
== Homotopy invariant sheaves == |
|||
A presheaf with transfers <math>F</math> is homotopy invariant if the projection morphism <math>p:X\times\mathbb{A}^1 \to X</math> induces an isomorphism <math>p^*:F(X) \to F(X\times \mathbb{A}^1)</math> for every smooth scheme <math>X</math>. There is a construction associating a '''homotopy invariant sheaf<ref name=":0" />''' for every presheaf with transfers <math>F</math> using an analogue of simplicial homology. |
|||
=== Simplicial homology === |
|||
There is a scheme<blockquote><math>\Delta^n = \text{Spec}\left( \frac{k[x_0,\ldots,x_n]}{\sum_{0 \leq i \leq n} x_i - 1} \right)</math></blockquote>giving a cosimplicial scheme <math>\Delta^*</math>, where the morphisms <math>\partial_j:\Delta^n \to \Delta^{n+1}</math> are given by <math>x_j = 0</math>. That is,<blockquote><math>\frac{k[x_0,\ldots,x_{n+1}]}{(\sum_{0 \leq i \leq n} x_i - 1)} \to \frac{k[x_0,\ldots,x_{n+1}]}{(\sum_{0 \leq i \leq n} x_i - 1, x_j)} </math></blockquote>gives the induced morphism <math>\partial_j</math>. Then, to a presheaf with transfers <math>F</math>, there is an associated complex of presheaves with transfers <math>C_*F</math> sending<blockquote><math>C_iF: U \mapsto F(U \times \Delta^i)</math></blockquote>and has the induced chain morphisms<blockquote><math>\sum_{i=0}^j (-1)^i \partial_i^*: C_jF \to C_{j-1}F</math></blockquote>giving a complex of presheaves with transfers. The homology invariant presheaves with transfers <math>H_i(C_*F)</math> are homotopy invariant. In particular, <math>H_0(C_*F)</math> is the universal homotopy invariant presheaf with transfers associated to <math>F</math>. |
|||
==== Relation with Chow group of zero cycles ==== |
|||
Denote <math>H_0^{sing}(X/k) := H_0(C_*\mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X))(\text{Spec}(k))</math>. There is an induced surjection <math>H_0^{sing}(X/k) \to \text{CH}_0(X)</math> which is an isomorphism for <math>X</math> projective. |
|||
==== Zeroth homology of Z<sub>tr</sub>(X) ==== |
|||
The zeroth homology of <math>H_0(C_*\mathbb{Z}_{tr}(Y))(X) </math> is <math>\text{Hom}_{Cor}(X,Y)/\mathbb{A}^1 \text{ homotopy}</math> where homotopy equivalence is given as follows. Two finite correspondences <math>f,g:X \to Y</math> are <math>\mathbb{A}^1</math>-homotopy equivalent if there is a morphism <math>h:X\times\mathbb{A}^1 \to X</math> such that <math>h|_{X\times 0} = f</math> and <math>h|_{X \times 1} = g</math>. |
|||
== Motivic complexes == |
|||
For Voevodsky's category of mixed motives, the motive <math>M(X)</math> associated to <math>X</math>, is the class of <math>C_*\mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X)</math> in <math>DM_{Nis}^{eff,-}(k,R)</math>. One of the elementary motivic complexes are <math>\mathbb{Z}(q)</math> for <math>q \geq 1</math>, defined by the class of<blockquote><math>\mathbb{Z}(q) = C_*\mathbb{Z}_{tr}(\mathbb{G}_m^{\wedge q})[-q]</math><ref name=":0" /></blockquote>For an abelian group <math>A</math>, such as <math>\mathbb{Z}/\ell</math>, there is a motivic complex <math>A(q) = \mathbb{Z}(q) \otimes A</math>. These give the motivic cohomology groups defined by<blockquote><math>H^{p,q}(X,\mathbb{Z}) = \mathbb{H}_{Zar}^p(X,\mathbb{Z}(q))</math></blockquote>since the motivic complexes <math>\mathbb{Z}(q)</math> restrict to a complex of Zariksi sheaves of <math>X</math>.<ref name=":0" /> These are called the <math>p</math>-th motivic cohomology groups of '''weight''' <math>q</math>. They can also be extended to any abelian group <math>A</math>,<blockquote><math>H^{p,q}(X,A) = \mathbb{H}_{Zar}^p(X,A(q))</math></blockquote>giving motivic cohomology with coefficients in <math>A</math> of weight <math>q</math>. |
|||
=== Special cases === |
|||
There are a few special cases which can be analyzed explicitly. Namely, when <math>q = 0,1</math>. These results can be found in the fourth lecture of the Clay Math book. |
|||
==== Z(0) ==== |
|||
In this case, <math>\mathbb{Z}(0) \cong \mathbb{Z}_{tr}(\mathbb{G}_m^{\wedge 0})</math> which is quasi-isomorphic to <math>\mathbb{Z}</math> (top of page 17),<ref name=":0" /> hence the weight <math>0</math> cohomology groups are isomorphic to<blockquote><math>H^{p,0}(X,\mathbb{Z}) = \begin{cases} |
|||
\mathbb{Z}(X) & \text{if } p = 0 \\ |
|||
0 & \text{otherwise} |
|||
\end{cases}</math></blockquote>where <math>\mathbb{Z}(X) = \text{Hom}_{Cor}(X,\text{Spec}(k))</math>. Since an open cover |
|||
==== Z(1) ==== |
|||
This case requires more work, but the end result is a quasi-isomorphism between <math>\mathbb{Z}(1)</math> and <math>\mathcal{O}^*[-1]</math>. This gives the two motivic cohomology groups<blockquote><math>\begin{align} |
|||
H^{1,1}(X,\mathbb{Z}) &= H^0_{Zar}(X,\mathcal{O}^*) = \mathcal{O}^*(X) \\ |
|||
H^{2,1}(X,\mathbb{Z}) &= H^1_{Zar}(X,\mathcal{O}^*) = \text{Pic}(X) |
|||
\end{align}</math></blockquote>where the middle cohomology groups are Zariski cohomology. |
|||
=== General case: Z(n) === |
|||
In general, over a perfect field <math>k</math>, there is a nice description of <math>\mathbb{Z}(n)</math> in terms of presheaves with transfer <math>\mathbb{Z}_{tr}(\mathbb{P}^n)</math>. There is a quasi-ismorphism<blockquote><math>C_*(\mathbb{Z}_{tr}(\mathbb{P}^n) / \mathbb{Z}_{tr}(\mathbb{P}^{n-1})) \simeq |
|||
C_*\mathbb{Z}_{tr}(\mathbb{G}_m^{\wedge q})[n] </math></blockquote>hence<blockquote><math>\mathbb{Z}(n) \simeq C_{*}(\mathbb {Z} _{tr}(\mathbb {P} ^{n})/\mathbb {Z} _{tr}(\mathbb {P} ^{n-1}))[-2n] </math></blockquote>which is found using splitting techniques along with a series of quasi-isomorphisms. The details are in lecture 15 of the Clay Math book. |
|||
== See also == |
== See also == |
||
*[[Relative cycle]] |
*[[Relative cycle]] |
||
*[[Motivic cohomology]] |
|||
*[[Mixed motives (math)]] |
|||
*[[Étale topology]] |
|||
*[[Nisnevich topology]] |
|||
== References == |
== References == |
||
{{reflist}} |
|||
⚫ | *{{Citation | last1=Mazza | first1=Carlo | last2=Voevodsky | first2=Vladimir | author2-link=Vladimir Voevodsky | last3=Weibel | first3=Charles | title=Lecture notes on motivic cohomology | publisher=[[American Mathematical Society]] | location=Providence, R.I. | series=Clay Mathematics Monographs | isbn=978-0-8218-3847-1 | mr=2242284 | year=2006 | volume=2}} |
||
{{refbegin}} |
|||
⚫ | *{{Citation | last1=Mazza | first1=Carlo | last2=Voevodsky | first2=Vladimir | author2-link=Vladimir Voevodsky | last3=Weibel | first3=Charles | title=Lecture notes on motivic cohomology | publisher=[[American Mathematical Society]] | location=Providence, R.I. | series=[[Clay Mathematics Monographs]] | isbn=978-0-8218-3847-1 | mr=2242284 | year=2006 | volume=2}} |
||
{{refend}} |
|||
== External links == |
== External links == |
||
*https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/sheaf+with+transfer |
*https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/sheaf+with+transfer |
||
[[Category:Homotopical algebra]] |
|||
⚫ | |||
[[Category:Sheaf theory]] |
[[Category:Sheaf theory]] |
||
[[Category:Functors]] |
[[Category:Functors]] |
Latest revision as of 21:57, 5 November 2024
In algebraic geometry, a presheaf with transfers is, roughly, a presheaf that, like cohomology theory, comes with pushforwards, “transfer” maps. Precisely, it is, by definition, a contravariant additive functor from the category of finite correspondences (defined below) to the category of abelian groups (in category theory, “presheaf” is another term for a contravariant functor).
When a presheaf F with transfers is restricted to the subcategory of smooth separated schemes, it can be viewed as a presheaf on the category with extra maps , not coming from morphisms of schemes but also from finite correspondences from X to Y
A presheaf F with transfers is said to be -homotopy invariant if for every X.
For example, Chow groups as well as motivic cohomology groups form presheaves with transfers.
Finite correspondence
[edit]Let be algebraic schemes (i.e., separated and of finite type over a field) and suppose is smooth. Then an elementary correspondence is an irreducible closed subscheme , some connected component of X, such that the projection is finite and surjective.[1] Let be the free abelian group generated by elementary correspondences from X to Y; elements of are then called finite correspondences.
The category of finite correspondences, denoted by , is the category where the objects are smooth algebraic schemes over a field; where a Hom set is given as: and where the composition is defined as in intersection theory: given elementary correspondences from to and from to , their composition is:
where denotes the intersection product and , etc. Note that the category is an additive category since each Hom set is an abelian group.
This category contains the category of smooth algebraic schemes as a subcategory in the following sense: there is a faithful functor that sends an object to itself and a morphism to the graph of .
With the product of schemes taken as the monoid operation, the category is a symmetric monoidal category.
Sheaves with transfers
[edit]The basic notion underlying all of the different theories are presheaves with transfers. These are contravariant additive functors
and their associated category is typically denoted , or just if the underlying field is understood. Each of the categories in this section are abelian categories, hence they are suitable for doing homological algebra.
Etale sheaves with transfers
[edit]These are defined as presheaves with transfers such that the restriction to any scheme is an etale sheaf. That is, if is an etale cover, and is a presheaf with transfers, it is an Etale sheaf with transfers if the sequence
is exact and there is an isomorphism
for any fixed smooth schemes .
Nisnevich sheaves with transfers
[edit]There is a similar definition for Nisnevich sheaf with transfers, where the Etale topology is switched with the Nisnevich topology.
Examples
[edit]Units
[edit]The sheaf of units is a presheaf with transfers. Any correspondence induces a finite map of degree over , hence there is the induced morphism
showing it is a presheaf with transfers.
Representable functors
[edit]One of the basic examples of presheaves with transfers are given by representable functors. Given a smooth scheme there is a presheaf with transfers sending .[2]
Representable functor associated to a point
[edit]The associated presheaf with transfers of is denoted .
Pointed schemes
[edit]Another class of elementary examples comes from pointed schemes with . This morphism induces a morphism whose cokernel is denoted . There is a splitting coming from the structure morphism , so there is an induced map , hence .
Representable functor associated to A1-0
[edit]There is a representable functor associated to the pointed scheme denoted .
Smash product of pointed schemes
[edit]Given a finite family of pointed schemes there is an associated presheaf with transfers , also denoted [2] from their Smash product. This is defined as the cokernel of
For example, given two pointed schemes , there is the associated presheaf with transfers equal to the cokernel of
This is analogous to the smash product in topology since where the equivalence relation mods out .
Wedge of single space
[edit]A finite wedge of a pointed space is denoted . One example of this construction is , which is used in the definition of the motivic complexes used in Motivic cohomology.
Homotopy invariant sheaves
[edit]A presheaf with transfers is homotopy invariant if the projection morphism induces an isomorphism for every smooth scheme . There is a construction associating a homotopy invariant sheaf[2] for every presheaf with transfers using an analogue of simplicial homology.
Simplicial homology
[edit]There is a scheme
giving a cosimplicial scheme , where the morphisms are given by . That is,
gives the induced morphism . Then, to a presheaf with transfers , there is an associated complex of presheaves with transfers sending
and has the induced chain morphisms
giving a complex of presheaves with transfers. The homology invariant presheaves with transfers are homotopy invariant. In particular, is the universal homotopy invariant presheaf with transfers associated to .
Relation with Chow group of zero cycles
[edit]Denote . There is an induced surjection which is an isomorphism for projective.
Zeroth homology of Ztr(X)
[edit]The zeroth homology of is where homotopy equivalence is given as follows. Two finite correspondences are -homotopy equivalent if there is a morphism such that and .
Motivic complexes
[edit]For Voevodsky's category of mixed motives, the motive associated to , is the class of in . One of the elementary motivic complexes are for , defined by the class of
For an abelian group , such as , there is a motivic complex . These give the motivic cohomology groups defined by
since the motivic complexes restrict to a complex of Zariksi sheaves of .[2] These are called the -th motivic cohomology groups of weight . They can also be extended to any abelian group ,
giving motivic cohomology with coefficients in of weight .
Special cases
[edit]There are a few special cases which can be analyzed explicitly. Namely, when . These results can be found in the fourth lecture of the Clay Math book.
Z(0)
[edit]In this case, which is quasi-isomorphic to (top of page 17),[2] hence the weight cohomology groups are isomorphic to
where . Since an open cover
Z(1)
[edit]This case requires more work, but the end result is a quasi-isomorphism between and . This gives the two motivic cohomology groups
where the middle cohomology groups are Zariski cohomology.
General case: Z(n)
[edit]In general, over a perfect field , there is a nice description of in terms of presheaves with transfer . There is a quasi-ismorphism
hence
which is found using splitting techniques along with a series of quasi-isomorphisms. The details are in lecture 15 of the Clay Math book.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- Mazza, Carlo; Voevodsky, Vladimir; Weibel, Charles (2006), Lecture notes on motivic cohomology, Clay Mathematics Monographs, vol. 2, Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Society, ISBN 978-0-8218-3847-1, MR 2242284