Jump to content

Presheaf with transfers: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m v2.04b - Bot T20 CW#61 - Fix errors for CW project (Reference before punctuation)
No edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
A presheaf ''F'' with transfers is said to be [[A¹ homotopy theory|<math>\mathbb{A}^1</math>-homotopy invariant]] if <math>F(X) \simeq F(X \times \mathbb{A}^1)</math> for every ''X''.
A presheaf ''F'' with transfers is said to be [[A¹ homotopy theory|<math>\mathbb{A}^1</math>-homotopy invariant]] if <math>F(X) \simeq F(X \times \mathbb{A}^1)</math> for every ''X''.


For example, a Chow group as well as [[motivic cohomology]] are presheaves with transfers.
For example, Chow groups as well as [[motivic cohomology]] groups form presheaves with transfers.


== Finite correspondence ==
== Finite correspondence ==
{{see also|Correspondence (algebraic geometry)}}
{{see also|Correspondence (algebraic geometry)}}
Let <math>X, Y</math> be algebraic schemes (i.e., separated and of finite type over a field) and suppose <math>X</math> is smooth. Then an '''elementary correspondence''' is a closed subvariety <math>W \subset X_i \times Y</math>, <math>X_i</math> some connected component of ''X'', such that the projection <math>W \to Y</math> is finite and surjective. Let <math>\operatorname{Cor}(X, Y)</math> be the free abelian group generated by elementary correspondences from ''X'' to ''Y''; elements of <math>\operatorname{Cor}(X, Y)</math> are then called '''finite correspondences'''.
Let <math>X, Y</math> be algebraic schemes (i.e., separated and of finite type over a field) and suppose <math>X</math> is smooth. Then an '''elementary correspondence''' is an irreducible closed subscheme <math>W \subset X_i \times Y</math>, <math>X_i</math> some connected component of ''X'', such that the projection <math>\operatorname{Supp}(W) \to X_i</math> is finite and surjective.<ref>{{harvnb|Mazza|Voevodsky|Weibel|2006|loc=Definition 1.1.}}</ref> Let <math>\operatorname{Cor}(X, Y)</math> be the free abelian group generated by elementary correspondences from ''X'' to ''Y''; elements of <math>\operatorname{Cor}(X, Y)</math> are then called '''finite correspondences'''.


The category of finite correspondences, denoted by <math>Cor</math>, is the category where the objects are smooth algebraic schemes over a field; where a Hom set is given as: <math>\operatorname{Hom}(X, Y) = \operatorname{Cor}(X, Y)</math>
The category of finite correspondences, denoted by <math>Cor</math>, is the category where the objects are smooth algebraic schemes over a field; where a Hom set is given as: <math>\operatorname{Hom}(X, Y) = \operatorname{Cor}(X, Y)</math>
Line 24: Line 24:


=== Etale sheaves with transfers ===
=== Etale sheaves with transfers ===
These are defined as presheaves with transfers such that the restriction to any scheme <math>X</math> is an etale sheaf. That is, if <math>U \to X</math> is an etale cover, and <math>F</math> is a presheaf with transfers, the it is an '''Etale sheaf with transfers''' if the sequence<blockquote><math>0 \to F(X) \xrightarrow{\text{diag}} F(U) \xrightarrow{(+,-)} F(U\times_XU)</math></blockquote>is exact and there is an isomorphism<blockquote><math>F(X\coprod Y) = F(X)\oplus F(Y)</math></blockquote>for any fixed smooth schemes <math>X,Y</math>.
These are defined as presheaves with transfers such that the restriction to any scheme <math>X</math> is an etale sheaf. That is, if <math>U \to X</math> is an etale cover, and <math>F</math> is a presheaf with transfers, it is an '''Etale sheaf with transfers''' if the sequence<blockquote><math>0 \to F(X) \xrightarrow{\text{diag}} F(U) \xrightarrow{(+,-)} F(U\times_XU)</math></blockquote>is exact and there is an isomorphism<blockquote><math>F(X\coprod Y) = F(X)\oplus F(Y)</math></blockquote>for any fixed smooth schemes <math>X,Y</math>.


=== Nisnevich sheaves with transfers ===
=== Nisnevich sheaves with transfers ===
Line 47: Line 47:


=== Smash product of pointed schemes ===
=== Smash product of pointed schemes ===
Given a finite family of pointed schemes <math>(X_i, x_i)</math> there is an associated presheaf with transfers<math>\mathbb{Z}_{tr}((X_1,x_1)\wedge\cdots\wedge(X_n,x_n))</math>, also denoted <math>\mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X_1\wedge\cdots\wedge X_n)</math><ref name=":0" /> from their [[Smash product]]. This is defined as the cokernel of<blockquote><math>\text{coker}\left( \bigoplus_i \mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X_1\times \cdots \times \hat{X}_i \times \cdots \times X_n) \xrightarrow{id\times \cdots \times x_i \times \cdots \times id} \mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X_1\times\cdots\times X_n) \right)</math></blockquote>For example, given two pointed schemes <math>(X,x),(Y,y)</math>, there is the associated presheaf with transfers <math>\mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X\wedge Y)</math> equal to the cokernel of<blockquote><math>\mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X)\oplus \mathbb{Z}_{tr}(Y) \xrightarrow{ \begin{bmatrix}1\times y & x\times 1 \end{bmatrix}} \mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X\times Y)</math><ref>Note <math>X \cong X\times \{ y\}</math> giving <math>\mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X\times\{y\}) \cong \mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X)</math></ref></blockquote>This is analogous to the smash product in topology since <math>X\wedge Y = (X \times Y) / (X \vee Y)</math> where the equivalence relation mods out <math>X\times \{y\} \cup \{x\}\times Y</math>.
Given a finite family of pointed schemes <math>(X_i, x_i)</math> there is an associated presheaf with transfers <math>\mathbb{Z}_{tr}((X_1,x_1)\wedge\cdots\wedge(X_n,x_n))</math>, also denoted <math>\mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X_1\wedge\cdots\wedge X_n)</math><ref name=":0" /> from their [[Smash product]]. This is defined as the cokernel of<blockquote><math>\text{coker}\left( \bigoplus_i \mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X_1\times \cdots \times \hat{X}_i \times \cdots \times X_n) \xrightarrow{id\times \cdots \times x_i \times \cdots \times id} \mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X_1\times\cdots\times X_n) \right)</math></blockquote>For example, given two pointed schemes <math>(X,x),(Y,y)</math>, there is the associated presheaf with transfers <math>\mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X\wedge Y)</math> equal to the cokernel of<blockquote><math>\mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X)\oplus \mathbb{Z}_{tr}(Y) \xrightarrow{ \begin{bmatrix}1\times y & x\times 1 \end{bmatrix}} \mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X\times Y)</math><ref>Note <math>X \cong X\times \{ y\}</math> giving <math>\mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X\times\{y\}) \cong \mathbb{Z}_{tr}(X)</math></ref></blockquote>This is analogous to the smash product in topology since <math>X\wedge Y = (X \times Y) / (X \vee Y)</math> where the equivalence relation mods out <math>X\times \{y\} \cup \{x\}\times Y</math>.


==== Wedge of single space ====
==== Wedge of single space ====
Line 56: Line 56:


=== Simplicial homology ===
=== Simplicial homology ===
There is a scheme<blockquote><math>\Delta^n = \text{Spec}\left( \frac{k[x_0,\ldots,x_n]}{\sum_{0 \leq i \leq n} x_i - 1} \right)</math></blockquote>giving a cosimplicial scheme <math>\Delta^*</math>, where the morphisms <math>\partial_j:\Delta^n \to \Delta^{n+1}</math> are given by <math>x_j = 0</math>. That is,<blockquote><math>\frac{k[x_0,\ldots,x_{n+1}]}{(\sum_{0 \leq i \leq n} x_i - 1)} \to \frac{k[x_0,\ldots,x_{n+1}]}{(\sum_{0 \leq i \leq n} x_i - 1, x_j)} </math></blockquote>gives the induced morphism <math>\partial_j</math>. Then, to a presheaf with transfers <math>F</math>, there is an associated complex of presheaves with transfers <math>C_*F</math> sending<blockquote><math>C_iF: U \mapsto F(U \times \Delta^i)</math></blockquote>and has the induced chain morphisms<blockquote><math>\sum_{i=0}^j (-1)^i \partial_i^*: C_jF \to C_{j-1}F</math></blockquote>giving a complex of presheaves with transfers. The homology invaritant presheaves with transfers <math>H_i(C_*F)</math> are homotopy invariant. In particular, <math>H_0(C_*F)</math> is the universal homotopy invariant presheaf with transfers associated to <math>F</math>.
There is a scheme<blockquote><math>\Delta^n = \text{Spec}\left( \frac{k[x_0,\ldots,x_n]}{\sum_{0 \leq i \leq n} x_i - 1} \right)</math></blockquote>giving a cosimplicial scheme <math>\Delta^*</math>, where the morphisms <math>\partial_j:\Delta^n \to \Delta^{n+1}</math> are given by <math>x_j = 0</math>. That is,<blockquote><math>\frac{k[x_0,\ldots,x_{n+1}]}{(\sum_{0 \leq i \leq n} x_i - 1)} \to \frac{k[x_0,\ldots,x_{n+1}]}{(\sum_{0 \leq i \leq n} x_i - 1, x_j)} </math></blockquote>gives the induced morphism <math>\partial_j</math>. Then, to a presheaf with transfers <math>F</math>, there is an associated complex of presheaves with transfers <math>C_*F</math> sending<blockquote><math>C_iF: U \mapsto F(U \times \Delta^i)</math></blockquote>and has the induced chain morphisms<blockquote><math>\sum_{i=0}^j (-1)^i \partial_i^*: C_jF \to C_{j-1}F</math></blockquote>giving a complex of presheaves with transfers. The homology invariant presheaves with transfers <math>H_i(C_*F)</math> are homotopy invariant. In particular, <math>H_0(C_*F)</math> is the universal homotopy invariant presheaf with transfers associated to <math>F</math>.


==== Relation with Chow group of zero cycles ====
==== Relation with Chow group of zero cycles ====
Line 95: Line 95:
== References ==
== References ==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}
{{refbegin}}
*{{Citation | last1=Mazza | first1=Carlo | last2=Voevodsky | first2=Vladimir | author2-link=Vladimir Voevodsky | last3=Weibel | first3=Charles | title=Lecture notes on motivic cohomology | publisher=[[American Mathematical Society]] | location=Providence, R.I. | series=[[Clay Mathematics Monographs]] | isbn=978-0-8218-3847-1 | mr=2242284 | year=2006 | volume=2}}
*{{Citation | last1=Mazza | first1=Carlo | last2=Voevodsky | first2=Vladimir | author2-link=Vladimir Voevodsky | last3=Weibel | first3=Charles | title=Lecture notes on motivic cohomology | publisher=[[American Mathematical Society]] | location=Providence, R.I. | series=[[Clay Mathematics Monographs]] | isbn=978-0-8218-3847-1 | mr=2242284 | year=2006 | volume=2}}
{{refend}}


== External links ==
== External links ==
*https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/sheaf+with+transfer
*https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/sheaf+with+transfer

{{algebraic-geometry-stub}}


[[Category:Homotopical algebra]]
[[Category:Homotopical algebra]]

Latest revision as of 21:57, 5 November 2024

In algebraic geometry, a presheaf with transfers is, roughly, a presheaf that, like cohomology theory, comes with pushforwards, “transfer” maps. Precisely, it is, by definition, a contravariant additive functor from the category of finite correspondences (defined below) to the category of abelian groups (in category theory, “presheaf” is another term for a contravariant functor).

When a presheaf F with transfers is restricted to the subcategory of smooth separated schemes, it can be viewed as a presheaf on the category with extra maps , not coming from morphisms of schemes but also from finite correspondences from X to Y

A presheaf F with transfers is said to be -homotopy invariant if for every X.

For example, Chow groups as well as motivic cohomology groups form presheaves with transfers.

Finite correspondence

[edit]

Let be algebraic schemes (i.e., separated and of finite type over a field) and suppose is smooth. Then an elementary correspondence is an irreducible closed subscheme , some connected component of X, such that the projection is finite and surjective.[1] Let be the free abelian group generated by elementary correspondences from X to Y; elements of are then called finite correspondences.

The category of finite correspondences, denoted by , is the category where the objects are smooth algebraic schemes over a field; where a Hom set is given as: and where the composition is defined as in intersection theory: given elementary correspondences from to and from to , their composition is:

where denotes the intersection product and , etc. Note that the category is an additive category since each Hom set is an abelian group.

This category contains the category of smooth algebraic schemes as a subcategory in the following sense: there is a faithful functor that sends an object to itself and a morphism to the graph of .

With the product of schemes taken as the monoid operation, the category is a symmetric monoidal category.

Sheaves with transfers

[edit]

The basic notion underlying all of the different theories are presheaves with transfers. These are contravariant additive functors

and their associated category is typically denoted , or just if the underlying field is understood. Each of the categories in this section are abelian categories, hence they are suitable for doing homological algebra.

Etale sheaves with transfers

[edit]

These are defined as presheaves with transfers such that the restriction to any scheme is an etale sheaf. That is, if is an etale cover, and is a presheaf with transfers, it is an Etale sheaf with transfers if the sequence

is exact and there is an isomorphism

for any fixed smooth schemes .

Nisnevich sheaves with transfers

[edit]

There is a similar definition for Nisnevich sheaf with transfers, where the Etale topology is switched with the Nisnevich topology.

Examples

[edit]

Units

[edit]

The sheaf of units is a presheaf with transfers. Any correspondence induces a finite map of degree over , hence there is the induced morphism

[2]

showing it is a presheaf with transfers.

Representable functors

[edit]

One of the basic examples of presheaves with transfers are given by representable functors. Given a smooth scheme there is a presheaf with transfers sending .[2]

Representable functor associated to a point

[edit]

The associated presheaf with transfers of is denoted .

Pointed schemes

[edit]

Another class of elementary examples comes from pointed schemes with . This morphism induces a morphism whose cokernel is denoted . There is a splitting coming from the structure morphism , so there is an induced map , hence .

Representable functor associated to A1-0

[edit]

There is a representable functor associated to the pointed scheme denoted .

Smash product of pointed schemes

[edit]

Given a finite family of pointed schemes there is an associated presheaf with transfers , also denoted [2] from their Smash product. This is defined as the cokernel of

For example, given two pointed schemes , there is the associated presheaf with transfers equal to the cokernel of

[3]

This is analogous to the smash product in topology since where the equivalence relation mods out .

Wedge of single space

[edit]

A finite wedge of a pointed space is denoted . One example of this construction is , which is used in the definition of the motivic complexes used in Motivic cohomology.

Homotopy invariant sheaves

[edit]

A presheaf with transfers is homotopy invariant if the projection morphism induces an isomorphism for every smooth scheme . There is a construction associating a homotopy invariant sheaf[2] for every presheaf with transfers using an analogue of simplicial homology.

Simplicial homology

[edit]

There is a scheme

giving a cosimplicial scheme , where the morphisms are given by . That is,

gives the induced morphism . Then, to a presheaf with transfers , there is an associated complex of presheaves with transfers sending

and has the induced chain morphisms

giving a complex of presheaves with transfers. The homology invariant presheaves with transfers are homotopy invariant. In particular, is the universal homotopy invariant presheaf with transfers associated to .

Relation with Chow group of zero cycles

[edit]

Denote . There is an induced surjection which is an isomorphism for projective.

Zeroth homology of Ztr(X)

[edit]

The zeroth homology of is where homotopy equivalence is given as follows. Two finite correspondences are -homotopy equivalent if there is a morphism such that and .

Motivic complexes

[edit]

For Voevodsky's category of mixed motives, the motive associated to , is the class of in . One of the elementary motivic complexes are for , defined by the class of

[2]

For an abelian group , such as , there is a motivic complex . These give the motivic cohomology groups defined by

since the motivic complexes restrict to a complex of Zariksi sheaves of .[2] These are called the -th motivic cohomology groups of weight . They can also be extended to any abelian group ,

giving motivic cohomology with coefficients in of weight .

Special cases

[edit]

There are a few special cases which can be analyzed explicitly. Namely, when . These results can be found in the fourth lecture of the Clay Math book.

Z(0)

[edit]

In this case, which is quasi-isomorphic to (top of page 17),[2] hence the weight cohomology groups are isomorphic to

where . Since an open cover

Z(1)

[edit]

This case requires more work, but the end result is a quasi-isomorphism between and . This gives the two motivic cohomology groups

where the middle cohomology groups are Zariski cohomology.

General case: Z(n)

[edit]

In general, over a perfect field , there is a nice description of in terms of presheaves with transfer . There is a quasi-ismorphism

hence

which is found using splitting techniques along with a series of quasi-isomorphisms. The details are in lecture 15 of the Clay Math book.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Mazza, Voevodsky & Weibel 2006, Definition 1.1.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g Lecture Notes on Motivic Cohomology (PDF). Clay Math. pp. 13, 15–16, 17, 21, 22.
  3. ^ Note giving
[edit]