Jump to content

Bahvricha Upanishad: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Contents: Cleanup and typo fixing, typo(s) fixed: ’s → 's
Monkbot (talk | contribs)
m Task 20: replace {lang-??} templates with {langx|??} ‹See Tfd› (Replaced 1);
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
| philosophy = [[Shaktism]], [[Vedanta]]{{Sfn|Mahadevan|1975|pp=238–239}}
| philosophy = [[Shaktism]], [[Vedanta]]{{Sfn|Mahadevan|1975|pp=238–239}}
}}
}}
The '''''Bahvricha Upanishad''''' ({{lang-sa| बह्वृच उपनिषद्}}, [[IAST]]: Bahvṛca Upaniṣad) is a medieval era Sanskrit text and one of the minor [[Upanishad]]s of [[Hinduism]].{{Sfn|Mahadevan|1975|pp=234–239}} It is classified as one of the eight [[Shakta]] Upanishads and attached to the [[Rigveda]].{{Sfn| Tinoco|1996|p=88}}
The '''''Bahvricha Upanishad''''' ({{langx|sa| बह्वृच उपनिषद्}}, [[IAST]]: Bahvṛca Upaniṣad) is a medieval era Sanskrit text and one of the minor [[Upanishad]]s of [[Hinduism]].{{Sfn|Mahadevan|1975|pp=234–239}} It is classified as one of the eight [[Shakta Upanishads]] and attached to the [[Rigveda]].{{Sfn| Tinoco|1996|p=88}}


The Upanishad is notable for asserting that the Self (soul, Atman) is a Goddess who alone existed before the creation of the universe.{{Sfn|Mahadevan|1975|p=237}}{{Sfn|Muller|1860|p=323}} She is the supreme power, asserts the text, she is the ultimate reality ([[Brahman]]), from her being and because of her the universe was born, she is the knowledge, the consciousness and the soul ([[Atman (Hinduism)|Atman]]) of every being.{{Sfn|Mahadevan|1975|p=237}}{{Sfn|Nair|2008|p=576}}{{Sfn|Muller|1860|pp=321–323}}
The Upanishad is notable for asserting that the Self (soul, Atman) is a Goddess who alone existed before the creation of the universe.{{Sfn|Mahadevan|1975|p=237}}{{Sfn|Muller|1860|p=323}} She is the supreme power, asserts the text, she is the ultimate reality ([[Brahman]]), from her being and because of her the universe was born, she is the knowledge, the consciousness and the soul ([[Atman (Hinduism)|Atman]]) of every being.{{Sfn|Mahadevan|1975|p=237}}{{Sfn|Nair|2008|p=576}}{{Sfn|Muller|1860|pp=321–323}}


The philosophical premises of ''Bahvricha Upanishad'' assert the feminine as non-different, non-dual (''Advaita'') from transcendent reality, she being the primary and the material cause of all existence,{{Sfn|Mahadevan|1975|p=237}} and the text belongs to the ''Shaktadavaitavada'' tradition (literally, the path of nondualistic Shakti).{{Sfn|McDaniel|2004|pp=89–91}}{{Sfn|Mahony|1997|p=274 with note 73}}
The philosophical premises of ''Bahvricha Upanishad'' assert the feminine as non-different, non-dual (''Advaita'') from transcendent reality, she is the primary and the material cause of all existence,{{Sfn|Mahadevan|1975|p=237}} and the text belongs to the ''Shaktadavaitavada'' tradition (literally, the path of nondualistic Shakti).{{Sfn|McDaniel|2004|pp=89–91}}{{Sfn|Mahony|1997|p=274 with note 73}}


==History==
==History==
Neither the author nor the composition date of ''Bahvricha Upanishad'' is known. The text was likely composed, in the same period as other Shakta Upanishads, between the 12th- and 15th-century CE.{{Sfn|Cush|2007|p=740}} The text existed before the 14th-century, states [[Max Muller]], as it was referenced by the 13th/14th-century Dvaita Vedanta scholar [[Madhvacharya]].{{Sfn|Muller|1860|p=321}}
Neither the author nor the composition date of ''Bahvricha Upanishad'' is known. The text was likely composed, in the same period as other Shakta Upanishads, between the 12th- and 15th-century [[Common Era|CE]].{{Sfn|Cush|2007|p=740}} The text existed before the 14th-century, states [[Max Muller]], as it was referenced by the 13th/14th-century Dvaita Vedanta scholar [[Madhvacharya]].{{Sfn|Muller|1860|p=321}}


In 19th-century compilations of the Upanishads, a part of the Aitareya [[Aranyaka]]s from the [[Rigveda]] was sometimes called ''[[Aitareya Upanishad]]'', ''Atmasatka Upanishad'' and also ''Bahvricha Upanishad''.<ref>Karl Potter (2008), Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies, Motilal Banarsidass, {{ISBN|978-8120803107}}, page 270</ref> The Devi-related medieval era ''Bahvricha Upanishad'' is different from the ancient BCE era Aitareya Upanishad, but both discuss the nature of Atman (soul, Self).<ref>Paul Deussen (1997), Sixty Upanishads of the Veda, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, {{ISBN|978-81-208-1468-4}}, pages 7–20</ref><ref>Patrick Olivelle (1998), The Early Upanisads, Oxford University Press, {{ISBN|978-0195352429}}, pages 314–323</ref>
In 19th-century compilations of the Upanishads, a part of the Aitareya [[Aranyaka]]s from the [[Rigveda]] was sometimes called ''[[Aitareya Upanishad]]'', ''Atmasatka Upanishad'' and also ''Bahvricha Upanishad''.<ref>Karl Potter (2008), Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies, Motilal Banarsidass, {{ISBN|978-8120803107}}, page 270</ref> The Devi-related medieval era ''Bahvricha Upanishad'' is different from the ancient BCE era Aitareya Upanishad, but both discuss the nature of Atman (soul, Self).<ref>Paul Deussen (1997), Sixty Upanishads of the Veda, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, {{ISBN|978-81-208-1468-4}}, pages 7–20</ref><ref>Patrick Olivelle (1998), The Early Upanisads, Oxford University Press, {{ISBN|978-0195352429}}, pages 314–323</ref>
Line 27: Line 27:


==Contents==
==Contents==
The text consists of 9 verses.{{Sfn|Narayanaswami|1999}} Some manuscripts include a prelude in the form of an invocation asserting that the Vedas must be imbibed in one's mind, thoughts and speech, and through truth only is peace assured.{{Sfn|Warrier|1967|pp=73–76}}
The text consists of 9 verses.{{Sfn|Narayanaswami|1999}} Some manuscripts include a prelude in the form of an invocation asserting that the Vedas must be imbibed in one's mind, thoughts and speech, and through truth only is peace assured.{{Sfn|Warrier|1967|pp=73–76}}


The Upanishad opens with the assertion "Devi is one and she alone existed in the beginning",{{Sfn|Nair|2008|p=576}} she is ''Kama'' (love),{{Sfn|Warrier|1967|pp=73–76}} and she is [[Atman (Hinduism)|Atman]] (soul, Self),{{Sfn|Mahadevan|1975|p=237}}{{Sfn|Muller|1860|p=323}} The second verse of the Upanishad states that not only Brahma, Vishnu and Rudra are her progeny but every being in the universe is her creation.{{Sfn|Warrier|1967|pp=73–76}}
The Upanishad opens with the assertion "Devi is one and she alone existed in the beginning",{{Sfn|Nair|2008|p=576}} she is ''Kama'' (love),{{Sfn|Warrier|1967|pp=73–76}} and she is [[Atman (Hinduism)|Atman]] (soul, Self),{{Sfn|Mahadevan|1975|p=237}}{{Sfn|Muller|1860|p=323}} The second verse of the Upanishad states that not only Brahma, Vishnu and Rudra are her progeny but every being in the universe is her creation.{{Sfn|Warrier|1967|pp=73–76}}


The Upanishad describes Devi as identical to all truth and reality, and whatever is not she as unreal, non-truth and non-self.{{Sfn|Mahadevan|1975|p=237}} She is the ultimate unchanging reality ([[Brahman]]), the consciousness, the bliss who shines by herself. She is everywhere, within and without, asserts the Upanishad.{{Sfn|Mahadevan|1975|p=237}} She is pure, she is love and she symbolized as the [[Tripura Sundari|Tripurasundari]] goddess is the form of all.{{Sfn|Mahadevan|1975|p=237}}{{Sfn|Nair|2008|p=576}} She is the [[ardha matra]], last half syllable, of the [[Om]] syllable. Her ''Shakti'' is in Om.{{Sfn|Warrier|1967|pp=73–76}}
The Upanishad describes Devi as identical to all truth and reality, and whatever is not she as unreal, non-truth and non-self.{{Sfn|Mahadevan|1975|p=237}} She is the ultimate unchanging reality ([[Brahman]]), the consciousness, the bliss who shines by herself. She is everywhere, within and without, asserts the Upanishad.{{Sfn|Mahadevan|1975|p=237}} She is pure, she is love and she symbolized as the [[Tripura Sundari|Tripurasundari]] goddess is the form of all.{{Sfn|Mahadevan|1975|p=237}}{{Sfn|Nair|2008|p=576}} She is the ardha matra, last half syllable, of the [[Om]] syllable. Her ''Shakti'' is in Om.{{Sfn|Warrier|1967|pp=73–76}}


{{quote|
<blockquote style="background:none; margin-right:5em; margin-left:0; border-left:solid 5px #FFE0BB; padding:1em;">
<poem>
<poem>
She alone is Atman. Other than She is untruth, non-self. She is Brahman-Consciousness. She is the [[Vidya (Knowledge)|Vidya]] of Consciousness, [[Advaita|nondual]] Brahman Consciousness, a wave of Truth-Consciousness-Bliss. The Beauty of the three-great-cities, penetrating without and within, is resplendent, nondual, self-subsisting. What is, is pure Truth; what shines, is pure Consciousness; what is dear, is Bliss. So here is the Maha-Tripura-sundari who assumes all forms. You and I and all the world and all divinities and all besides are the Maha-Tripura-sundari. The sole Truth is the thing named "the Beautiful". It is the nondual, integral, supreme Brahman.
''She alone is Atman. Other than She is untruth, non-self. She is Brahman-Consciousness. She is the [[Vidya (Knowledge)|Vidya]] of Consciousness, [[Advaita|nondual]] Brahman Consciousness, a wave of Truth-Consciousness-Bliss. The Beauty of the three-great-cities, penetrating without and within, is resplendent, nondual, self-subsisting. What is, is pure Truth; what shines, is pure Consciousness; what is dear, is Bliss. So here is the Maha-Tripura-sundari who assumes all forms. You and I and all the world and all divinities and all besides are the Maha-Tripura-sundari. The sole Truth is the thing named "the Beautiful". It is the nondual, integral, supreme Brahman.''
</poem>
</poem>
''Bahvricha Upanishad'' Verse 5 (Abridged), Translated by AG Krishna Warrier{{Sfn|Warrier|1967|pp=73–76}}{{Sfn|Narayanaswami|1999|p=verse॥५॥,Quote: <poem>सैवात्मा ततोऽन्यमसत्यमनात्मा । अत एषा
|''Bahvricha Upanishad, Verse 5 (Abridged), Translated by AG Krishna Warrier''{{Sfn|Warrier|1967|pp=73–76}}<ref>Narayanaswami,1999, Bahvricha Upanishad, Verse 5, Quote: सैवात्मा ततोऽन्यमसत्यमनात्मा।
ब्रह्मासंवित्तिर्भावभावकलाविनिर्मुक्ता
अत एषा ब्रह्मासंवित्तिर्भावभावकलाविनिर्मुक्ता
चिद्विद्याऽद्वितीयब्रह्मसंवित्तिः सच्चिदानन्दलहरी
चिद्विद्याऽद्वितीयब्रह्मसंवित्तिः सच्चिदानन्दलहरी
महात्रिपुरसुन्दरी बहिरन्तरनुप्रविश्य स्वयमेकैव विभाति ।
महात्रिपुरसुन्दरी बहिरन्तरनुप्रविश्य स्वयमेकैव विभाति।
यदस्ति सन्मात्रम्। यद्विभाति चिन्मात्रम्। यत्प्रियमानन्दं तदेतत् पूर्वाकारा महात्रिपुरसुन्दरी। त्वं चाहं च सर्वं विश्वं सर्वदेवता इतरत्स र्वं महात्रिपुरसुन्दरी। सत्यमेकं ललिताख्यं वस्तु तदद्वितीयमखण्डार्थं परं ब्रह्म।</ref>}}
यदस्ति सन्मात्रम् । यद्विभाति चिन्मात्रम् ।
यत्प्रियमानन्दं तदेतत् पूर्वाकारा महात्रिपुरसुन्दरी ।
त्वं चाहं च सर्वं विश्वं सर्वदेवता इतरत्
सर्वं महात्रिपुरसुन्दरी । सत्यमेकं ललिताख्यं वस्तु
तदद्वितीयमखण्डार्थं परं ब्रह्म</poem>}}</blockquote>


The closing verses of the text asserts that she should be contemplated as "That which I am", as ''Sodasi'' and fifteen syllabled ''[[Sri Vidya]]'', the power of [[Savitr|Savitur]], [[Sarasvati]], and [[Gayatri]], the sacred, the mother, the auspicious who chooses her own partner, the mistress, the dark, the light, the [[Brahman|Brahmic]] bliss.{{Sfn|Warrier|1967|pp=73–76}}
The closing verses of the text asserts that she should be contemplated as "That which I am", as ''Sodasi'' and fifteen syllabled ''[[Sri Vidya]]'', the power of [[Savitr|Savitur]], [[Sarasvati]], and [[Gayatri]], the sacred, the mother, the auspicious who chooses her own partner, the mistress, the dark, the light, the [[Brahman|Brahmic]] bliss.{{Sfn|Warrier|1967|pp=73–76}}
Line 67: Line 63:
*{{cite book|first= William| last= Mahony | year= 1997 | title= The Artful Universe: An Introduction to the Vedic Religious Imagination|publisher= State University of New York Press |isbn= 978-0791435809}}
*{{cite book|first= William| last= Mahony | year= 1997 | title= The Artful Universe: An Introduction to the Vedic Religious Imagination|publisher= State University of New York Press |isbn= 978-0791435809}}
*{{cite book|last= McDaniel |first=June |title=Offering Flowers, Feeding Skulls|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=caeJpIj9SdkC | year =2004| publisher=Oxford University Press| isbn=978-0-19-534713-5}}
*{{cite book|last= McDaniel |first=June |title=Offering Flowers, Feeding Skulls|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=caeJpIj9SdkC | year =2004| publisher=Oxford University Press| isbn=978-0-19-534713-5}}
*{{cite book|first = Max| last = Muller| title= A History of Ancient Sanskrit Literature, 2nd Edition| publisher= Oxford University Press|year = 1860| url= https://books.google.com/books?id=U-1jAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA323 }}
*{{cite book|first = Max| last = Muller| title= A History of Ancient Sanskrit Literature, 2nd Edition| publisher= Oxford University Press|year = 1860| isbn = 9781981766918| url= https://books.google.com/books?id=U-1jAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA323 }}
*{{cite book|last= Nair |first=Shantha |title=Echoes of Ancient Indian Wisdom|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OzFvE0IR7rkC|year= 2008|publisher=Pustak Mahal|isbn=978-81-223-1020-7}}
*{{cite book|last= Nair |first=Shantha |title=Echoes of Ancient Indian Wisdom|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OzFvE0IR7rkC|year= 2008|publisher=Pustak Mahal|isbn=978-81-223-1020-7}}
*{{cite book|last=Tinoco|first=Carlos Alberto|title=Upanishads | year=1996| url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7xoNEM63hZEC&pg=PA88 |publisher=IBRASA|isbn=978-85-348-0040-2}}
*{{cite book|last=Tinoco|first=Carlos Alberto|title=Upanishads | year=1996| url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7xoNEM63hZEC&pg=PA88 |publisher=IBRASA|isbn=978-85-348-0040-2}}
Line 76: Line 72:


[[Category:Upanishads]]
[[Category:Upanishads]]
[[Category:Sanskrit texts]]

Latest revision as of 16:43, 6 November 2024

Bahvricha Upanishad
The Upanishad states the universe began from the feminine
Devanagariबह्वृच
IASTBahvṛca
Title meansOne conversant with Rigveda[1]
Date12th- to 15th-century CE[2]
TypeShakta[3]
Linked VedaRigveda[4]
Chapters1
Verses9[5]
PhilosophyShaktism, Vedanta[6]

The Bahvricha Upanishad (Sanskrit: बह्वृच उपनिषद्, IAST: Bahvṛca Upaniṣad) is a medieval era Sanskrit text and one of the minor Upanishads of Hinduism.[7] It is classified as one of the eight Shakta Upanishads and attached to the Rigveda.[4]

The Upanishad is notable for asserting that the Self (soul, Atman) is a Goddess who alone existed before the creation of the universe.[8][9] She is the supreme power, asserts the text, she is the ultimate reality (Brahman), from her being and because of her the universe was born, she is the knowledge, the consciousness and the soul (Atman) of every being.[8][10][11]

The philosophical premises of Bahvricha Upanishad assert the feminine as non-different, non-dual (Advaita) from transcendent reality, she is the primary and the material cause of all existence,[8] and the text belongs to the Shaktadavaitavada tradition (literally, the path of nondualistic Shakti).[12][13]

History

[edit]

Neither the author nor the composition date of Bahvricha Upanishad is known. The text was likely composed, in the same period as other Shakta Upanishads, between the 12th- and 15th-century CE.[2] The text existed before the 14th-century, states Max Muller, as it was referenced by the 13th/14th-century Dvaita Vedanta scholar Madhvacharya.[14]

In 19th-century compilations of the Upanishads, a part of the Aitareya Aranyakas from the Rigveda was sometimes called Aitareya Upanishad, Atmasatka Upanishad and also Bahvricha Upanishad.[15] The Devi-related medieval era Bahvricha Upanishad is different from the ancient BCE era Aitareya Upanishad, but both discuss the nature of Atman (soul, Self).[16][17]

Manuscripts of this text are also found titled as Bahvrcopanisad.[5][18] In the Telugu language anthology of 108 Upanishads of the Muktika canon, narrated by Rama to Hanuman, it is listed at number 107.[19]

Contents

[edit]

The text consists of 9 verses.[5] Some manuscripts include a prelude in the form of an invocation asserting that the Vedas must be imbibed in one's mind, thoughts and speech, and through truth only is peace assured.[3]

The Upanishad opens with the assertion "Devi is one and she alone existed in the beginning",[10] she is Kama (love),[3] and she is Atman (soul, Self),[8][9] The second verse of the Upanishad states that not only Brahma, Vishnu and Rudra are her progeny but every being in the universe is her creation.[3]

The Upanishad describes Devi as identical to all truth and reality, and whatever is not she as unreal, non-truth and non-self.[8] She is the ultimate unchanging reality (Brahman), the consciousness, the bliss who shines by herself. She is everywhere, within and without, asserts the Upanishad.[8] She is pure, she is love and she symbolized as the Tripurasundari goddess is the form of all.[8][10] She is the ardha matra, last half syllable, of the Om syllable. Her Shakti is in Om.[3]

She alone is Atman. Other than She is untruth, non-self. She is Brahman-Consciousness. She is the Vidya of Consciousness, nondual Brahman Consciousness, a wave of Truth-Consciousness-Bliss. The Beauty of the three-great-cities, penetrating without and within, is resplendent, nondual, self-subsisting. What is, is pure Truth; what shines, is pure Consciousness; what is dear, is Bliss. So here is the Maha-Tripura-sundari who assumes all forms. You and I and all the world and all divinities and all besides are the Maha-Tripura-sundari. The sole Truth is the thing named "the Beautiful". It is the nondual, integral, supreme Brahman.

— Bahvricha Upanishad, Verse 5 (Abridged), Translated by AG Krishna Warrier[3][20]

The closing verses of the text asserts that she should be contemplated as "That which I am", as Sodasi and fifteen syllabled Sri Vidya, the power of Savitur, Sarasvati, and Gayatri, the sacred, the mother, the auspicious who chooses her own partner, the mistress, the dark, the light, the Brahmic bliss.[3]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Monier Monier-Williams, Sanskrit English Dictionary with Etymology, Oxford University Press, Article on Bahv-Bahvṛca, page 726
  2. ^ a b Cush 2007, p. 740.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g Warrier 1967, pp. 73–76.
  4. ^ a b Tinoco 1996, p. 88.
  5. ^ a b c Narayanaswami 1999.
  6. ^ Mahadevan 1975, pp. 238–239.
  7. ^ Mahadevan 1975, pp. 234–239.
  8. ^ a b c d e f g Mahadevan 1975, p. 237.
  9. ^ a b Muller 1860, p. 323.
  10. ^ a b c Nair 2008, p. 576.
  11. ^ Muller 1860, pp. 321–323.
  12. ^ McDaniel 2004, pp. 89–91.
  13. ^ Mahony 1997, p. 274 with note 73.
  14. ^ Muller 1860, p. 321.
  15. ^ Karl Potter (2008), Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-8120803107, page 270
  16. ^ Paul Deussen (1997), Sixty Upanishads of the Veda, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-81-208-1468-4, pages 7–20
  17. ^ Patrick Olivelle (1998), The Early Upanisads, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0195352429, pages 314–323
  18. ^ Vedic Literature, Volume 1, A Descriptive Catalogue of the Sanskrit Manuscripts, p. PA468, at Google Books, Government of Tamil Nadu, Madras, India, pages 268–270, 467–468
  19. ^ Deussen 1997, pp. 556–557.
  20. ^ Narayanaswami,1999, Bahvricha Upanishad, Verse 5, Quote: सैवात्मा ततोऽन्यमसत्यमनात्मा। अत एषा ब्रह्मासंवित्तिर्भावभावकलाविनिर्मुक्ता चिद्विद्याऽद्वितीयब्रह्मसंवित्तिः सच्चिदानन्दलहरी महात्रिपुरसुन्दरी बहिरन्तरनुप्रविश्य स्वयमेकैव विभाति। यदस्ति सन्मात्रम्। यद्विभाति चिन्मात्रम्। यत्प्रियमानन्दं तदेतत् पूर्वाकारा महात्रिपुरसुन्दरी। त्वं चाहं च सर्वं विश्वं सर्वदेवता इतरत्स र्वं महात्रिपुरसुन्दरी। सत्यमेकं ललिताख्यं वस्तु तदद्वितीयमखण्डार्थं परं ब्रह्म।

Bibliography

[edit]