Talk:Content validity: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
stats rating using AWB |
Tom.Reding (talk | contribs) m Category:Stub-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings: -stub, keep Start |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1= |
||
{{WikiProject Psychology}} |
|||
{{WPStatistics | importance = low | class = start}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Statistics| importance = low}} |
|||
{{maths rating |
|||
⚫ | |||
|class = Start |
|||
⚫ | |||
|field = Probability and statistics |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
Latest revision as of 19:13, 8 November 2024
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Need a citation
[edit]Brickc1 added the following text at 00:06, 28 October 2009:
- The latter is not validity in the technical sense; it refers, not to what the test actually measures, but to what it appears superficially to measure. Face validity pertains to whether the test "looks valid" to the examinees who take it, the administrative personnel who decide on its use, and other technically untrained observers
This is a word-for-word quote from Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.). New York: MacMillan. p. 144.
Since this is not an article on Face Validity, I question whether an extended description about Face Validity is even necessary. But if it stays, It should be put in quotes and cited. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmbrowne (talk • contribs) 18:16, 28 October 2009 (UTC)