Jump to content

Talk:YouPorn: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Reverted 1 edit by 2001:56A:70DB:D200:3AF8:9227:1718:770E (talk): Don't edit closed discussions
 
(135 intermediate revisions by 78 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{censor}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=
{{WikiProject Websites|importance=Mid|computing-importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Pornography|importance=Mid}}
}}
{{summary in|Porn 2.0}}
{{summary in|Porn 2.0}}
{{annual readership}}
{{Pornproject|class=Start|importance=}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{WebsiteNotice|class=start|importance=}}
| algo = old(60d)
| archive = Talk:YouPorn/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 1
| maxarchivesize = 150K
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
}}
{{Archives|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III|age=60}}


== Semi-protected edit request on 6 June 2023 ==
{{atop|No the image isn't going to be removed and no we're not going to pixelate/black out images. –[[User:Davey2010|<span style="color:blue;">'''Davey'''</span><span style="color:orange;">'''2010'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Davey2010|<span style="color:navy;">'''Talk'''</span>]]</sup> 12:17, 6 June 2020 (UTC)}}
{{edit semi-protected|YouPorn|answered=Yes}}
I propose the screenshot of the front of YouPorn be removed from this article. This imagery can be deeply disturbing and possibly triggering, not to mention the potential for children to be exposed to the imagery. Readers come to Wikipedia for information, not expecting hardcore pornographic imagery. It is not necessary to show the images in order to educate the public about what YouPorn is.[[Special:Contributions/2605:A000:1112:E464:605F:D626:2704:9A32|2605:A000:1112:E464:605F:D626:2704:9A32]] ([[User talk:2605:A000:1112:E464:605F:D626:2704:9A32|talk]]) 11:49, 6 June 2020 (UTC) [[Special:Contributions/2605:A000:1112:E464:605F:D626:2704:9A32|2605:A000:1112:E464:605F:D626:2704:9A32]] ([[User talk:2605:A000:1112:E464:605F:D626:2704:9A32|talk]]) 11:49, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
:I agree with this edit request because the "collapsible" parameter doesn't work on mobile, so we're showing porn screenshots to all mobile users. – '''[[User:Þjarkur|Thjarkur]]''' [[User talk:Þjarkur|(talk)]] 11:56, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
:{{declined}}, requested over and over, see [[WP:NOTCENSORED]] for the recurring answer. —[[User:Beetstra|Dirk Beetstra]] <sup>[[User_Talk:Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">T</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">C</span>]]</sup> 12:01, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
::It may be possible to pixel/black out the explicit parts of the image. Or is that [[WP:CENSORED]] too? --[[User:TheImaCow|TheImaCow]] ([[User talk:TheImaCow|talk]]) 12:06, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
:::{{u|TheImaCow}}, it is 257 × 388 pixels because it is here under a fair use rationale. Looking at it in the article on an iPad I can’t make out anything. Enlarging it does not show significantly show anything, even when going to the actual image. If this images is shocking in that state I guess that other articles on wikipedia where larger, more explicit images are needed for explanation of a concept will be much worse. Moreover, they would then not represent wha5 the website is representing. And yes, I think that all of that is also [[WP:NOTCENSORED]] if you want to make such images unrealistic. [[User:Beetstra|Dirk Beetstra]] <sup>[[User_Talk:Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">T</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">C</span>]]</sup> 12:15, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
:::Not happening. –[[User:Davey2010|<span style="color:blue;">'''Davey'''</span><span style="color:orange;">'''2010'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Davey2010|<span style="color:navy;">'''Talk'''</span>]]</sup> 12:17, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
{{abot}}


== Screenshot ==
:The list belongs better in [[Porn 2.0]] which is where I moved it. [[User:AxelBoldt|AxelBoldt]] 21:52, 8 November 2007 (UTC)


Could it be considered to remove the Screenshot? I think it would be helpful to people who do not want to see porn but rather just see the information. I think that the logo is just enough considering people probably already get the premise of the website. Considering the Pornhub Wikipedia page removed their screenshot, I see no reason why the YouPorn Wikipedia page can't remove theirs. [[User:Zdubzxx|Zdubzxx]] ([[User talk:Zdubzxx|talk]]) 17:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
==Corporate Agenda==
Just wondering if it's worth mentioning [[Bill O'Reilly]] has talked about this site specifically on his show several times, even showing a screenshot of the entry page. He says bad things about it, but it's almost like he wants people to check it out. I'll see if I can find a citation on the fox website. [[User:CashDude|CashDude]] ([[User talk:CashDude|talk]]) 09:29, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


== Most-view channel section? ==
==Blocking==
I think Malaysia blocks it too. Although the Malaysian government had promised under the MSC Agreement not to censor the internet, it appears that Malaysians (incl. me) cant access YouPorn. --[[Special:Contributions/60.50.73.210|60.50.73.210]]


Meaning someth. like [[List of most-subscribed YouTube channels]]
<quote>
{| class="wikitable" style="font-size: 85%;"
Following a request by a competing pornography service, German provider Arcor started to block YouPorn and a few other porn sites at the routing level in September 2007[16], affecting over 2 million users.
|-
</quote>
! Rnk
! Name
! Link
! Views (Millions)
|-
! 1
| backroom-casting-couch
| www.youporn.com/channel/556/backroom-casting-couch/
| 61
|-
! 2
|nubiles
| www.youporn.com/channel/1857/nubiles/
| 61
|-
! 3
|twistys
| www.youporn.com/channel/21/twistys/
| 16
|}


[[User:U652393|U652393]] ([[User talk:U652393|talk]]) 16:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Thats not correct. Arcors DNS-Server couldn't resolve in Sept 07, but IP wasn't blocked. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/88.67.134.210|88.67.134.210]] ([[User talk:88.67.134.210|talk]]) 14:38, 26 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: updated [[User:U652393|U652393]] ([[User talk:U652393|talk]]) 16:11, 5 January 2022 (UTC)


=== Singapore ===
==Owner, infobox==
This site does not appear to be blocked in Singapore. Redtube however actually is. Can anyone else confirm this? [[User:PlopperZ|PlopperZ]] ([[User talk:PlopperZ|talk]]) 14:45, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
It is unknown, MG Freesites Ltd. (Aylo) or might be [[Zeljko Raznatovic]]. --[[Special:Contributions/109.175.38.159|109.175.38.159]] ([[User talk:109.175.38.159|talk]]); 11:28, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

: It's certainly blocked by Singtel with an MDA notice. [[User:Jpatokal|Jpatokal]] ([[User talk:Jpatokal|talk]]) 12:13, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

YouPorn has been called "a good role model for the sexually naive", as many of its homemade videos depict ordinary couples having ordinary sex, as opposed to the often unreal scenarios of commercial porn

Really? "ordinary couples"?? when was the last time you and your partner had sex with 6 other guys, in public. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/222.154.163.174|222.154.163.174]] ([[User talk:222.154.163.174|talk]]) 14:37, 15 August 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Uhh... Link plz. [[User:Bxistaken]] <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment was added at 03:02, 26 August 2008 (UTC)</small><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

==Downloading==
The site appears to have removed the flv download link for the videos as of 9/15/2008. As of this date, there are no previews for any videos. Also, the "Related Videos" and "Featured Videos" sections are unpopulated or missing. [[User:Ara Praxis|Ara Praxis]] ([[User talk:Ara Praxis|talk]]) 20:18, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

*Update

Some of the more recent videos have been showing previews for their movies. However, it seems that all amateur porn has been removed from the site and replaced with hardcore pornography. [[Special:Contributions/98.150.166.112|98.150.166.112]] ([[User talk:98.150.166.112|talk]]) 03:37, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Yeah for some reason youporn deleted all of their videos about a month or 2 ago and replaced them with some new ones, and surprisingly it seems that amateur vids aren't being added anymore and a lot of the vids seem to be previews for movies you can buy and even feature a link to where you can buy it, personally this leads me to believe that sice youporn has has had an increase in good quality porn and a decrease in amateur porn that while the site still says that you can upload videos thaey really got rid of it and started adding their own vids, though it could also be that they deleted the old vids since alot of them were pirated and began adding only new ones of high quality and not amateur along with ones that they upload personally as ads so as to generate revenue. also i should note that lots of their vids say youporn at the bottom right hand corner. ([[Special:Contributions/207.172.55.227|207.172.55.227]] ([[User talk:207.172.55.227|talk]]) 07:21, 1 November 2008 (UTC))

==External Links==
Is there a reason it's not a link? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/99.232.23.134|99.232.23.134]] ([[User talk:99.232.23.134|talk]]) 02:57, 6 October 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

why is this page protected, it reads like an advertisement for youporn in many ways and could sure use some editing. The site is not as much about web2.0 and user generated content as it is about pure piracy.[[User:Copyrightthieveswillpay|Copyrightthieveswillpay]] ([[User talk:Copyrightthieveswillpay|talk]])

:The URL has been [[m:Spam blacklist|blacklisted]]. Why? I don't know. [[m:User:COIBot/LinkReports/youporn.com]] might help explain. -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Longhair|talk]]</sup> 22:41, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

===RfC: External links===



Is it a reason for us not linking to www.youporn.com? [[User:Nsaa|Nsaa]] ([[User talk:Nsaa|talk]]) 16:57, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

*I think there needs to be a clear reason for not linking if this is to be the case. A link would be natural in most circumstances, YouTube for example. [[User:Martin Hogbin|Martin Hogbin]] ([[User talk:Martin Hogbin|talk]]) 23:50, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

*The link was blacklisted by a bot it seems, or on the advice of the bot, per the report at [[m:User:COIBot/LinkReports/youporn.com]]. I think it's just merely a matter of requesting the URL be unblocked as there doesn't appear to be any large scale spamming of the link occuring. -- [[User:Longhair|Longhair]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Longhair|talk]]</sup> 01:58, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
:: It's declined at [[meta:Talk:Spam_blacklist#YouPorn.com]], It's possible to ask for a [[MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist|whitelisting]] at [[MediaWiki_talk:Spam-whitelist]]. [[User:Nsaa|Nsaa]] ([[User talk:Nsaa|talk]]) 09:37, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
*I think the problem does not lie with linking to the main page but rather that some may add links to individual videos. [[User:Darrenhusted|Darrenhusted]] ([[User talk:Darrenhusted|talk]]) 10:00, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
:In which case whitelisting should work - the "safe" home page, for example, can we whitelisted leaving the blacklist to block links to individual videos (at least I'm fairly certain that's how it works!) <font color="#E66C2C">[[User:QuiteUnusual|'''Unusual? Quite''']]</font> <sup><font color="#306754">[[User talk:QuiteUnusual|TalkQu]]</font></sup> 21:36, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
::German Wikipedia [[:de:YouPorn#Weblinks]] uses a tinyurl kind of service to override the meta blacklist <nowiki>http://tiny.sk/ggd2kg7j</nowiki>, but I'm not sure if this is a good solution? [[User:Nsaa|Nsaa]] ([[User talk:Nsaa|talk]]) 11:16, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
* I'm all for including a link. Is there anyone who opposes it? The issue with blacklists and botreverts is of later concern once there is a consensus that the link should be there. [[User:Martijn Hoekstra|Martijn Hoekstra]] ([[User talk:Martijn Hoekstra|talk]]) 12:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
* Is the material legal in the US.? Is it non-copyvio? then there's no reason to avoid linking to it. The home page of the subject of the article should otherwise ''always'' be a link. WP is Not Censored. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 01:48, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

== external link not working ==

{{tl|editsemiprotected}}
External links* www.youporn.com - Official Site is not working in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Youporn
:{{notdone}}. The website is blacklisted so can't be linked too, so I removed the link altogether, the address is in the infobox if needed--[[User:Jac16888|Jac16888]] ([[User talk:Jac16888|talk]]) 19:03, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:56, 9 November 2024

Semi-protected edit request on 6 June 2023

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


I propose the screenshot of the front of YouPorn be removed from this article. This imagery can be deeply disturbing and possibly triggering, not to mention the potential for children to be exposed to the imagery. Readers come to Wikipedia for information, not expecting hardcore pornographic imagery. It is not necessary to show the images in order to educate the public about what YouPorn is.2605:A000:1112:E464:605F:D626:2704:9A32 (talk) 11:49, 6 June 2020 (UTC) 2605:A000:1112:E464:605F:D626:2704:9A32 (talk) 11:49, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this edit request because the "collapsible" parameter doesn't work on mobile, so we're showing porn screenshots to all mobile users. – Thjarkur (talk) 11:56, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
no Declined, requested over and over, see WP:NOTCENSORED for the recurring answer. —Dirk Beetstra T C 12:01, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It may be possible to pixel/black out the explicit parts of the image. Or is that WP:CENSORED too? --TheImaCow (talk) 12:06, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
TheImaCow, it is 257 × 388 pixels because it is here under a fair use rationale. Looking at it in the article on an iPad I can’t make out anything. Enlarging it does not show significantly show anything, even when going to the actual image. If this images is shocking in that state I guess that other articles on wikipedia where larger, more explicit images are needed for explanation of a concept will be much worse. Moreover, they would then not represent wha5 the website is representing. And yes, I think that all of that is also WP:NOTCENSORED if you want to make such images unrealistic. Dirk Beetstra T C 12:15, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not happening. –Davey2010Talk 12:17, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Screenshot

[edit]

Could it be considered to remove the Screenshot? I think it would be helpful to people who do not want to see porn but rather just see the information. I think that the logo is just enough considering people probably already get the premise of the website. Considering the Pornhub Wikipedia page removed their screenshot, I see no reason why the YouPorn Wikipedia page can't remove theirs. Zdubzxx (talk) 17:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Most-view channel section?

[edit]

Meaning someth. like List of most-subscribed YouTube channels

Rnk Name Link Views (Millions)
1 backroom-casting-couch www.youporn.com/channel/556/backroom-casting-couch/ 61
2 nubiles www.youporn.com/channel/1857/nubiles/ 61
3 twistys www.youporn.com/channel/21/twistys/ 16

U652393 (talk) 16:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

updated U652393 (talk) 16:11, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Owner, infobox

[edit]

It is unknown, MG Freesites Ltd. (Aylo) or might be Zeljko Raznatovic. --109.175.38.159 (talk); 11:28, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]