Talk:Washington University in St. Louis: Difference between revisions
Apparently being in America’s top 25 universities is low importance. Also many of the rankings place this school higher than many Ivy Leagues. So it being high importance is justified. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
|||
(26 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Vital article|class=C|level=5|topic=Society|subpage=Culture}} |
|||
{{FailedGA|21:36, 4 January 2013 (UTC)|topic=Education|page=1}} |
{{FailedGA|21:36, 4 January 2013 (UTC)|topic=Education|page=1}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1= |
|||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Higher education}} |
||
{{WikiProject Missouri |
{{WikiProject Missouri|importance=High}} |
||
{{WikiProject United States |
{{WikiProject United States|importance=high|WUSL=yes|WUSL-importance=top}} |
||
{{WikiProject St. Louis |
{{WikiProject St. Louis|importance=High}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{afd-merged-from|WUTV 22|WUTV 22|23 October 2010}} |
{{afd-merged-from|WUTV 22|WUTV 22|23 October 2010}} |
||
Line 16: | Line 15: | ||
[[/Deletion discussion]]}} |
[[/Deletion discussion]]}} |
||
== Proposed merge of [[George Warren Brown School of Social Work]] into [[Washington University in St. Louis]] == |
|||
== school rankings == |
|||
{{Discussion top|result=To '''not''' merge, given sufficient independent reliable sources. [[User:Klbrain|Klbrain]] ([[User talk:Klbrain|talk]]) 09:11, 26 September 2024 (UTC)}} |
|||
I don't see sufficient notability for an independent article. Most of the content is referenced to a primary source, there is a large unsourced table of research centers that can simply go. There is some interesting information (e.g., first admission of Black students) that can be merged into the main article <small>'''''[[User:Polyamorph|Polyamorph]]''''' ([[User talk:Polyamorph#top|talk]])</small> 10:55, 1 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' I think that there's sufficient material to justify an independent article. ~ [[User:HAL333|<span style="background:red; color:white; padding:2px; border:1px solid red;">'''HAL'''</span>]][[User talk:HAL333|<span style="background:black; color:white; padding:2px; border:1px solid red;">'''333'''</span>]] 15:08, 14 September 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' There are ''barely'' sufficient sources to pass [[WP:GNG]] but they're there - the book dedicated entirely to the history of this organization that begins in the early 1900s is especially convincing. [[User:ElKevbo|ElKevbo]] ([[User talk:ElKevbo|talk]]) 21:29, 14 September 2024 (UTC) |
|||
{{Discussion bottom}} |
|||
== Rebrand == |
|||
i noticed that in the table listing the school's rankings by different websites, only one of them is sourced. i will go and look for sources, but if i cannot find them, i will remove the information. let me know if you have any questions. [[User:GoGatorMeds|GoGatorMeds]] ([[User talk:GoGatorMeds|talk]]) 16:22, 29 July 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:i added sources to the rankings, and had to fix one of them because it was one ranking off. i did have to remove the architecture ranking completely though -- this article claimed it to be ranked 4th by design intelligence, but the rankings [http://www.di.net/articles/america-s-best-architecture-schools-2014/] show otherwise. let me know if you have any questions.[[User:GoGatorMeds|GoGatorMeds]] ([[User talk:GoGatorMeds|talk]]) 16:40, 29 July 2014 (UTC) |
|||
I've changed references from "Washington University" to "WashU" in accordance with today's announcement of a rebrand. More work on name references and logos will need to be done once there is more clarity on what can still be used and what is now considered defunct (particularly concerning university seals). [[User:WUSTLWikiWarrior|WUSTLWikiWarrior]] ([[User talk:WUSTLWikiWarrior|talk]]) 16:44, 16 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== External links modified == |
|||
:Also, work will be needed on the pages of individual WashU schools, as well as other pages related to the school. [[User:WUSTLWikiWarrior|WUSTLWikiWarrior]] ([[User talk:WUSTLWikiWarrior|talk]]) 16:46, 16 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|||
:I’m going to undo this per [[WP:COMMONNAME]]. [[User:McYeee|McYeee]] ([[User talk:McYeee|talk]]) 17:15, 16 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::Note https://marcomm.washu.edu/our-name/. Specifically says that "Washington University" should no longer be used in reference to WashU. [[User:WUSTLWikiWarrior|WUSTLWikiWarrior]] ([[User talk:WUSTLWikiWarrior|talk]]) 17:28, 16 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
I have just modified 7 external links on [[Washington University in St. Louis]]. Please take a moment to review [[special:diff/813925103|my edit]]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|||
:::@[[User:McYeee|McYeee]], you are right that we should keep that as the name for now throughout the article–however, certain official names have changed, which should be reflected in the article. [[User:WUSTLWikiWarrior|WUSTLWikiWarrior]] ([[User talk:WUSTLWikiWarrior|talk]]) 17:35, 16 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090210215846/http://library.wustl.edu/units/spec/archives/facts/george.html to http://library.wustl.edu/units/spec/archives/facts/george.html |
|||
:::There are three issues here. First, this is an internal guideline for marketing, and Wikipedia goes by what a consensus of reliable sources use, not by internal guidelines. Second, the guideline doesn't even say that "Washington University" is incorrect, just that it should not be used, which in this context means should not be used by university PR people. Finally, do you have any sources that say that certain official names have actually changed? [[User:McYeee|McYeee]] ([[User talk:McYeee|talk]]) 17:36, 16 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130303214641/http://www.wustl.edu/about/facts/chancellors/compton.html to http://www.wustl.edu/about/facts/chancellors/compton.html |
|||
::::Fair points–however, I would expect colloquial name usage to change (including in news articles) to WashU in the coming months as a result of this, at which point we can make the necessary updates. |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090505013930/http://genome.wustl.edu/information.cgi to http://genome.wustl.edu/information.cgi |
|||
::::As for your third point, official school websites have made the switches to their new informal (not formal) names; this includes "WUSM" to "WashU Medicine." |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150505134008/http://mup.asu.edu/research2007.pdf to http://mup.asu.edu/research2007.pdf |
|||
::::One thing that ''will'' have to be changed on Wiki sooner rather than later is the logo. I am not sure about the official seal, but the logo at the bottom of the infobox is now outdated. [[User:WUSTLWikiWarrior|WUSTLWikiWarrior]] ([[User talk:WUSTLWikiWarrior|talk]]) 18:00, 16 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061217030031/http://su.wustl.edu/general/groupresources/directory.php to http://su.wustl.edu/general/groupresources/directory.php |
|||
:::::I've asked WikiData to change the Official URL. The page is Semi-protected there. I agree that the logo has to be changed. I don't know about the seal either. [[User:McYeee|McYeee]] ([[User talk:McYeee|talk]]) 18:36, 16 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130306114732/http://library.wustl.edu/units/spec/archives/facts/rhodes-scholars.html to http://library.wustl.edu/units/spec/archives/facts/rhodes-scholars.html |
|||
::::::Yes, I was looking into doing that earlier but did not want to change it manually from the official URL as is used in the template. Thank you. [[User:WUSTLWikiWarrior|WUSTLWikiWarrior]] ([[User talk:WUSTLWikiWarrior|talk]]) 18:53, 16 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061115131629/http://library.wustl.edu/units/spec/archives/facts/nobelprizes.html to http://library.wustl.edu/units/spec/archives/facts/nobelprizes.html |
|||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. |
|||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} |
|||
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 23:41, 5 December 2017 (UTC) |
|||
== Merge with Danforth_Campus == |
|||
Hello. |
|||
I would like to recommend merging https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danforth_Campus as a section within this article. None of the information in the Danforth Campus article is relevant without the larger article about the school. [[User:Swickouski|Swickouski]] ([[User talk:Swickouski|talk]]) 21:53, 20 April 2020 (UTC) |
|||
== Inclusion of information about new student organization == |
|||
One or more editors, including [[User:Archivistrun|Archivistrun]], is insisting that this article include information about a new student organization, Izagani Omega Pi: |
|||
:Washington University in St. Louis is home to Izagani Omega Pi, the university's first and only fratority as of 2022. Over 50 students (primarily first years) are involved in the Izagani Omega Pi Fratority, all genders are welcome to join, and there is no hazing. Fratority siblings participate in numerous activities including Mario Kart tournaments, zoo trips, traditional waffle nights, games of capture the flag, and arts and crafts activities among others. Furthermore, the Izagani Omega Pi Fratority has its own official bathroom on campus on the first floor of Seigle Hall.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Izagani Omega Pi: WU’s first ‘fratority’ promotes student bonding|url=https://www.studlife.com/scene/2021/12/01/izagani-omega-pi-wus-first-fratority-promotes-first-year-bonding/|access-date=2022-01-03|website=Student Life|language=en}}</ref> |
|||
Two other editors, me and [[User:Bcwarner|Bcwarner]], have objected to this addition. I object on the grounds of [[WP:DUE|undue weight]]; this is simply not information that merits inclusion in this article that must summarize the entire history, organization, funding, resources, challenges, and accomplishments of a complex organization that is nearly 170 years old. Further, this appears to be promotional and at least one of the editors, Archivistrun, has an [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Archivistrun&diff=prev&oldid=1063451260 admitted conflict of interest with respect to this university]. [[User:ElKevbo|ElKevbo]] ([[User talk:ElKevbo|talk]]) 17:04, 4 January 2022 (UTC) |
|||
{{reftalk}} |
|||
:Thank you for your input ElKevbo. First of all, I would like to note that [[User:Bcwarner|Bcwarner]] has the same "conflict of interest" as I do, so I don't think that should be a deciding factor. If anything, we are two people that care about the school we attend. |
|||
:In regards to "undue weight," with Wikipedia being the world's largest online encyclopedia and a hub of information, I always tend to air on the side of including more information because that is what I think Wikipedia is all about. However, if other editors feel that this is giving one group too much weight over another, I invite them to shorten the information. I personally do not feel it is given undue weight (it is similar in specificity to information given for many of the a capella groups on campus), and given its unique and novel nature, I feel like there are merits to describe the ''basic'' information of the group (when it was founded, how large it is, and what it does). It strikes me as bizarre that Bcwarner has repeatedly removed this information and made no attempts to edit it or its language, as it is just as valid as information on any other student group listed. |
|||
:I appreciate you opening this issue up for discussion and I hope you can see where my thoughts are at. |
|||
:-Archivistrun <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Archivistrun|Archivistrun]] ([[User talk:Archivistrun#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Archivistrun|contribs]]) 17:15, 4 January 2022 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:: Hi Archivistrun, I understand your concern about my twice reverting this addition to the page, esp. given that I’m also a student there. For the first revert, it was evidently self-promotional based on the language used and the information presented, and would have likely been deleted by another editor at some point anyways. For the second revert, I had seen that the section headers were removed, but the language and details were largely unchanged. Barring the promotional nature of the original edit, there were still several problems with the paragraph. Some details are likely not relevant to a reader, such as the mentioned bathroom in Seigle. Other aspects were given disproportionately too much detail based on the ''current'' lack of notoreity, such as the extensive list of activities provided. In addition, some of this information is going to be very hard to keep current, such as membership count and demographics, given the one source. I’m not opposed to the inclusion of information about the group (in my personal opinion, this “fratority” concept is a great idea), but given it was established 6 months ago, most—if not all—information originally provided about this group belongs in the original StudLife article. A user who is more interested in reading about this group can get more information from that article or other WashU websites. I could see a very small sentence or clause being integrated into another paragraph about this group, as long as it meets the standards in the aforementioned [[WP:DUE]], [[WP:NPOV]], and [[WP:ROC]], as well as other Wikipedia writing standards. [[User:Bcwarner|Bcwarner]] ([[User talk:Bcwarner|talk]]) 18:46, 4 January 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::I strongly recommend that both of you review our [[WP:COI|guidelines regarding conflicts of interest]]; you should both probably be limiting your edits to suggestions and requests here in Talk instead of directly editing the article. |
|||
:::I am not yet convinced that this student organizations merits inclusion in this article at all. Is there any evidence that anyone outside of the university has made special notice of this organization? Without that kind of information, it does appear to be promotional. |
|||
:::I could be persuaded to compromise and include a sentence in a section that discusses other student organizations. |
|||
:::Archivistrun, if you would like to propose removing other student organizations from this article on the basis that their inclusion is also [[WP:DUE|undue]] - no evidence of them being noteworthy, likely added by others with a conflict of interest, etc. - then I would be amenable to that proposal. These articles do tend to gather that kind of cruft from well-meaning students and alumni who aren't in tune with our practices and policies. [[User:ElKevbo|ElKevbo]] ([[User talk:ElKevbo|talk]]) 19:15, 4 January 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::: Apologies, I should have probably been more cognizant of my COI and COI policies. I'm not going to interfere anymore, esp. now that the original spam has been dealt with; thank you for taking care of the rest of this. Archivistrun, your new suggestion is already a significant improvement from the original, thank you for working to improve it. [[User:Bcwarner|Bcwarner]] ([[User talk:Bcwarner|talk]]) 20:08, 5 January 2022 (UTC) |
|||
━ |
|||
::::ElKevbo, given that you have 13 years of experience editing this article, I would defer to you in this situation. If you are amenable to adding one sentence, I think an appropriate place would be in the Greek life Section. It reads as follows: |
|||
::::: In 2020, a large number of Greek life members, primarily from sororities permanently deactivated from their chapters as a result of perceived systematic oppression, racism, and sexism. Many students are now calling for the total abolition of Greek Life on campus.[142] |
|||
:::: Now based on the article, the fratority was created "in hopes of capturing the positive social aspects of Greek Life while prioritizing inclusivity." With this in mind, I'm thinking it would appropriate to amend that last sentence or add a completely new sentence with something like: |
|||
:::::"Some students have turned to creating student organizations to replace Greek Life, such as Izagani Omega Pi, which aim to implement some aspects of Greek Life while focusing on inclusivity." |
|||
:::: What are your thoughts on that? Obviously you can rephrase as appropriate. |
|||
:::: - [[User:Archivistrun|Archivistrun]] ([[User talk:Archivistrun|talk]]) 19:57, 4 January 2022 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 21:38, 9 November 2024
Washington University in St. Louis was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (January 4, 2013). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WUTV 22 was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 23 October 2010 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Washington University in St. Louis. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
McDonnell International Scholars Academy was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 2 June 2020 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Washington University in St. Louis. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
|
|
April 2005 - July 2006 |
Proposed merge of George Warren Brown School of Social Work into Washington University in St. Louis
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- To not merge, given sufficient independent reliable sources. Klbrain (talk) 09:11, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
I don't see sufficient notability for an independent article. Most of the content is referenced to a primary source, there is a large unsourced table of research centers that can simply go. There is some interesting information (e.g., first admission of Black students) that can be merged into the main article Polyamorph (talk) 10:55, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I think that there's sufficient material to justify an independent article. ~ HAL333 15:08, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose There are barely sufficient sources to pass WP:GNG but they're there - the book dedicated entirely to the history of this organization that begins in the early 1900s is especially convincing. ElKevbo (talk) 21:29, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Rebrand
[edit]I've changed references from "Washington University" to "WashU" in accordance with today's announcement of a rebrand. More work on name references and logos will need to be done once there is more clarity on what can still be used and what is now considered defunct (particularly concerning university seals). WUSTLWikiWarrior (talk) 16:44, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Also, work will be needed on the pages of individual WashU schools, as well as other pages related to the school. WUSTLWikiWarrior (talk) 16:46, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- I’m going to undo this per WP:COMMONNAME. McYeee (talk) 17:15, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note https://marcomm.washu.edu/our-name/. Specifically says that "Washington University" should no longer be used in reference to WashU. WUSTLWikiWarrior (talk) 17:28, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- @McYeee, you are right that we should keep that as the name for now throughout the article–however, certain official names have changed, which should be reflected in the article. WUSTLWikiWarrior (talk) 17:35, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- There are three issues here. First, this is an internal guideline for marketing, and Wikipedia goes by what a consensus of reliable sources use, not by internal guidelines. Second, the guideline doesn't even say that "Washington University" is incorrect, just that it should not be used, which in this context means should not be used by university PR people. Finally, do you have any sources that say that certain official names have actually changed? McYeee (talk) 17:36, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Fair points–however, I would expect colloquial name usage to change (including in news articles) to WashU in the coming months as a result of this, at which point we can make the necessary updates.
- As for your third point, official school websites have made the switches to their new informal (not formal) names; this includes "WUSM" to "WashU Medicine."
- One thing that will have to be changed on Wiki sooner rather than later is the logo. I am not sure about the official seal, but the logo at the bottom of the infobox is now outdated. WUSTLWikiWarrior (talk) 18:00, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- I've asked WikiData to change the Official URL. The page is Semi-protected there. I agree that the logo has to be changed. I don't know about the seal either. McYeee (talk) 18:36, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I was looking into doing that earlier but did not want to change it manually from the official URL as is used in the template. Thank you. WUSTLWikiWarrior (talk) 18:53, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- I've asked WikiData to change the Official URL. The page is Semi-protected there. I agree that the logo has to be changed. I don't know about the seal either. McYeee (talk) 18:36, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note https://marcomm.washu.edu/our-name/. Specifically says that "Washington University" should no longer be used in reference to WashU. WUSTLWikiWarrior (talk) 17:28, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Former good article nominees
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- B-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- B-Class Higher education articles
- WikiProject Higher education articles
- B-Class Missouri articles
- High-importance Missouri articles
- B-Class United States articles
- High-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of High-importance
- B-Class Washington University in St. Louis articles
- Top-importance Washington University in St. Louis articles
- WikiProject Washington University in St. Louis articles
- Washington University in St. Louis articles with to-do lists
- WikiProject United States articles
- B-Class St. Louis articles
- High-importance St. Louis articles