Jump to content

Temelín Nuclear Power Station: Difference between revisions

Coordinates: 49°10′48.5″N 14°22′34.4″E / 49.180139°N 14.376222°E / 49.180139; 14.376222
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Fsikkema (talk | contribs)
removed references to "large scale protests" - dead links.
m Cleaned up using AutoEd
 
(22 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Nuclear power plant located near Temelín, Czech Republic}}
{{Short description|Power plant in the Czech Republic}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2020}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=November 2024}}
{{Infobox power station
{{Infobox power station
| name = Temelín Nuclear Power Station
| name = Temelín Nuclear Power Station
| image = Temelin-Nuclear Power Station.jpg
| image = Temelin-Nuclear Power Station.jpg
| image_caption =
| image_caption = Temelín nuclear power station
| country = [[Czech Republic]]
| country = Czech Republic
| location = [[Temelín]], South Bohemian Region
| location = [[Temelín]], South Bohemian Region
| coordinates = {{coord|49|10|48.5|N|14|22|34.4|E|region:CZ_type:landmark|display=inline,title}}
| coordinates = {{coord|49|10|48.5|N|14|22|34.4|E|region:CZ_type:landmark|display=inline,title}}
| owner =
| owner =
| operator = [[ČEZ Group]]
| operator = [[ČEZ Group]]
| employees = ~1,000
| employees = ~1,000
| construction_began = 1981
| construction_began = 1981
| commissioned = 10 June 2002
| commissioned = 10 June 2002
| decommissioned =
| decommissioned =
| np_reactor_supplier =
| np_reactor_supplier =
| np_reactor_type = [[VVER]] 1000/320 [[pressurized water reactor|PWR]]s
| np_reactor_type = [[VVER]] 1000/320 [[Pressurized water reactor|PWR]]s
| ps_units_operational = 2 x 1080 MWe (gross)<ref name=t1>{{cite web|accessdate=2018-05-08|title=PRIS - Reactor Details|url=https://www.iaea.org/PRIS/CountryStatistics/ReactorDetails.aspx?current=74|website=iaea.org|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180508185611/https://www.iaea.org/PRIS/CountryStatistics/ReactorDetails.aspx?current=74|archive-date=8 May 2018|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=t2>{{cite web|accessdate=2018-05-08|title=PRIS - Reactor Details|url=https://www.iaea.org/PRIS/CountryStatistics/ReactorDetails.aspx?current=75|website=iaea.org|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180508185704/https://www.iaea.org/PRIS/CountryStatistics/ReactorDetails.aspx?current=75|archive-date=8 May 2018|url-status=live}}</ref>
| ps_units_operational = 2 x 1080 MWe (gross)<ref name=t1>{{cite web|accessdate=8 May 2018|title=PRIS - Reactor Details|url=https://www.iaea.org/PRIS/CountryStatistics/ReactorDetails.aspx?current=74|website=iaea.org|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180508185611/https://www.iaea.org/PRIS/CountryStatistics/ReactorDetails.aspx?current=74|archive-date=8 May 2018|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=t2>{{cite web|accessdate=8 May 2018|title=PRIS - Reactor Details|url=https://www.iaea.org/PRIS/CountryStatistics/ReactorDetails.aspx?current=75|website=iaea.org|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180508185704/https://www.iaea.org/PRIS/CountryStatistics/ReactorDetails.aspx?current=75|archive-date=8 May 2018|url-status=live}}</ref>
| ps_units_decommissioned =
| ps_units_decommissioned =
| ps_units_cancelled = 2 x 950 MWe
| ps_units_cancelled = 2 x 950 MWe
| ps_units_uc =
| ps_units_uc =
| ps_units_planned =
| ps_units_planned =
| ps_electrical_capacity =
| ps_electrical_capacity =
| ps_annual_generation = 14,401 GWh
| ps_annual_generation = 14,401 GWh
| ps_electrical_cap_fac = 80.0%
| ps_electrical_cap_fac = 80.0%
| status = O
| status = O
| cost = 98.6 billion CZK
| cost = 98.6 billion CZK
| website = [http://www.cez.cz/en/power-plants-and-environment/nuclear-power-plants/temelin.html Company Website]
| website = {{Official website|cez.cz/cs/o-cez/infocentra/temelin-136405}}
}}
}}
'''Temelín Nuclear Power Station''' ({{lang-cs|Jaderná elektrárna Temelín}}, abbreviation ''ETE'') is a [[nuclear power plant]] in [[Temelín]] in the [[Czech Republic]]. Temelín NPP is owned by [[ČEZ]] Group, which employs 1000 workers at this site. The adjacent castle [[Vysoký Hrádek]] serves as an information centre.


'''Temelín Nuclear Power Station''' ({{langx|cs|Jaderná elektrárna Temelín}}, abbreviation ''ETE'') is a [[nuclear power plant]] in [[Temelín]], Czech Republic. It is owned by [[ČEZ Group]], which employs 1,000 workers at the site. The adjacent castle [[Vysoký Hrádek]] serves as an information centre.
In spring 2003, the Temelín Nuclear Power Plant, with its 2,180 MW of installed capacity, became the largest power resource in the Czech Republic.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cez.cz/en/power-plants-and-environment/nuclear-power-plants/temelin.html |title=CEZ Group &#124; Temelín |publisher=Cez.cz |accessdate=2014-03-07 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101225010614/http://www.cez.cz/en/power-plants-and-environment/nuclear-power-plants/temelin.html |archive-date=25 December 2010 |url-status=live}}</ref>

In 2003, the Temelín Nuclear Power Plant, with its 2,180 MW of installed capacity, became the largest power resource in the Czech Republic and the largest source of zero-emission electricity generation by far.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cez.cz/en/power-plants-and-environment/nuclear-power-plants/temelin.html |title=CEZ Group &#124; Temelín |publisher=Cez.cz |accessdate=7 March 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101225010614/http://www.cez.cz/en/power-plants-and-environment/nuclear-power-plants/temelin.html |archive-date=25 December 2010 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.cez.cz/sustainability/en/environmental/decarbonization | title=Decarbonization &#124; Sustainability in CEZ Group }}</ref>


==History==
==History==
[[File:Model JETE.jpg|thumb|left|Model of the plant at the information center. The light green area was originally intended for the two unbuilt reactors.]]
[[File:Model JETE.jpg|thumb|left|Model of the plant at the information centre. The light green area was originally intended for the two unbuilt reactors.]]
Planning began in the late 1970s and the final project was submitted in 1985. Construction of four operating units began in 1987. The project was expected to be completed in 1991 with estimated building costs of 35 billion [[Czechoslovak koruna|CSK]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://english.radio.cz/business-news-8046480|title=Temelin nuclear power plant activated|publisher=[[Czech Radio]]|date=12 October 2000|access-date=8 February 2023}}</ref> Six villages were demolished by the then-Communist government to make way for the power station.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://theses.cz/id/5hf8le/ |title=Economic, social and environmental impact of building and functioning of the nuclear power plants Temelín on Southern Bohemia |publisher=Theses.cz |accessdate=4 December 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111008222150/http://theses.cz/id/5hf8le/ |archive-date=8 October 2011 |url-status=live}}</ref>


After the [[Velvet revolution]] in 1990 the [[Czechoslovakia]]n government decided to cease construction of the third and fourth reactors.<ref name=hist>{{cite web |url=http://www.ekolist.cz/zprava.shtml?x=1932667 |title=Ekolist: Historie výstavby Jaderné elektrárny Temelín |date=10 November 2006 |publisher=Ekolist.cz |accessdate=4 December 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080329091918/http://www.ekolist.cz/zprava.shtml?x=1932667 |archive-date=29 March 2008 |url-status=live}}</ref> Work continued on the first two reactors; in the 1990s alterations to the original design were made by [[Westinghouse Electric Company|Westinghouse]] in conjunction with [[SUJB]] and the [[International Atomic Energy Agency|IAEA]] to bring reliability and safety levels into conformance with Western European standards. The standards audit was carried out by [[Halliburton|Halliburton NUS]]. As part of the alterations information and control systems were added, electrical modifications carried out, and cabling, reactor core and fuel elements were replaced.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.world-nuclear.org/sym/2000/hezoucky.htm| title=Temelin NPP Status: The Challenge of Safety Improvements| publisher=The Uranium Institute| date=2000-12-31| access-date=2009-08-03| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090408172315/http://www.world-nuclear.org/sym/2000/hezoucky.htm| archive-date=8 April 2009| url-status=live}}</ref> In 1993 the Czech government decided to complete the plant in the face of delays and [[cost overrun]]s, with expected completion at the time estimated for 1997.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://kormoran.vlada.cz/usneseni/usneseni_webtest.nsf/WebGovRes/6925AD93BE283D82C12571B6006FCE61?OpenDocument |title=USNESENÍ VLÁDY ČESKÉ REPUBLIKY ze dne 10. března 1993 č. 109 k problematice dostavby jaderné elektrárny Temelín |publisher=Kormoran.vlada.cz |date=10 March 1993 |accessdate=4 December 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120303145243/http://kormoran.vlada.cz/usneseni/usneseni_webtest.nsf/WebGovRes/6925AD93BE283D82C12571B6006FCE61?OpenDocument |archive-date=3 March 2012 |url-status=live}}</ref> In 1994 an opinion poll reported that 68% of Czech citizens were in favor of nuclear power development.<ref name=stem>{{cite web |url=http://www.stem.cz/clanek/111 |title=Rozvoj jaderné energetiky u nás podporují necelé tři pětiny občanů |publisher=Stem.cz |accessdate=4 December 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120303145242/http://www.stem.cz/clanek/111 |archive-date=3 March 2012 |url-status=live}}</ref>
Planning for the Temelín Nuclear Power Station began in the late 1970s, and the final project was submitted in 1985. Construction of four operating units began in 1987. The project was expected to be completed in 1991, with estimated building costs of 35 billion [[Czechoslovak koruna|CSK]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://english.radio.cz/business-news-8046480|title=Temelin nuclear power plant activated|publisher=[[Czech Radio]]|date=12 October 2000|access-date=8 February 2023}}</ref> Six villages were demolished by the then-[[Czechoslovak Socialist Republic|Communist government]] to make way for the power station.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://theses.cz/id/5hf8le/ |title=Economic, social and environmental impact of building and functioning of the nuclear power plants Temelín on Southern Bohemia |publisher=Theses.cz |accessdate=4 December 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111008222150/http://theses.cz/id/5hf8le/ |archive-date=8 October 2011 |url-status=live}}</ref>
After the [[Velvet Revolution]] in 1990, the [[Czechoslovakia|Czechoslovak]] government decided to cease construction of the third and fourth reactors;<ref name=hist>{{cite web |url=http://www.ekolist.cz/zprava.shtml?x=1932667 |title=Ekolist: Historie výstavby Jaderné elektrárny Temelín |date=10 November 2006 |publisher=Ekolist.cz |accessdate=4 December 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080329091918/http://www.ekolist.cz/zprava.shtml?x=1932667 |archive-date=29 March 2008 |url-status=live}}</ref> work continued on the first two reactors, however. In the 1990s, alterations to the original design were made by [[Westinghouse Electric Company|Westinghouse]], in conjunction with [[SUJB]] and the [[International Atomic Energy Agency|IAEA]], to bring reliability and safety levels into conformance with [[Western Europe]]an standards. The standards audit was carried out by [[Halliburton|Halliburton NUS]]. As part of the alterations, information and control systems were added, electrical modifications carried out, and cabling, reactor core, and fuel elements were replaced.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.world-nuclear.org/sym/2000/hezoucky.htm| title=Temelin NPP Status: The Challenge of Safety Improvements| publisher=The Uranium Institute| date=31 December 2000| access-date=3 August 2009| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090408172315/http://www.world-nuclear.org/sym/2000/hezoucky.htm| archive-date=8 April 2009| url-status=live}}</ref> In 1993, the Czech government decided to complete the plant in the face of delays and [[cost overrun]]s, with expected completion at the time estimated for 1997.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://kormoran.vlada.cz/usneseni/usneseni_webtest.nsf/WebGovRes/6925AD93BE283D82C12571B6006FCE61?OpenDocument |title=Usnesení vlády České republiky ze dne 10. března 1993 č. 109 k problematice dostavby jaderné elektrárny Temelín |publisher=Kormoran.vlada.cz |date=10 March 1993 |accessdate=4 December 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120303145243/http://kormoran.vlada.cz/usneseni/usneseni_webtest.nsf/WebGovRes/6925AD93BE283D82C12571B6006FCE61?OpenDocument |archive-date=3 March 2012 |url-status=live}}</ref> In 1994, an opinion poll reported that 68% of Czech citizens were in favour of nuclear power development.<ref name=stem>{{cite web |url=http://www.stem.cz/clanek/111 |title=Rozvoj jaderné energetiky u nás podporují necelé tři pětiny občanů |publisher=Stem.cz |accessdate=4 December 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120303145242/http://www.stem.cz/clanek/111 |archive-date=3 March 2012 |url-status=live}}</ref>

By 1998, construction was still not completed, and costs reached 71 billion CZK. The Czech government again reconsidered completion of the plant.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://kormoran.vlada.cz/usneseni/usneseni_webtest.nsf/WebGovRes/2C601D0777983566C12571B6006BD92C?OpenDocument |title=Usnesení vlády České republiky ze dne 12. srpna 1998 č. 516 o postupu nezávislého posouzení projektu dostavby jaderné elektrárny Temelín |publisher=Kormoran.vlada.cz |date=12 August 1998 |accessdate=4 December 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120303145248/http://kormoran.vlada.cz/usneseni/usneseni_webtest.nsf/WebGovRes/2C601D0777983566C12571B6006BD92C?OpenDocument |archive-date=3 March 2012 |url-status=live}}</ref> In 1999, the decision was made to continue, projecting completion to 2000, with a maximum cost of 98.6 CZK billion.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://kormoran.vlada.cz/usneseni/usneseni_webtest.nsf/WebGovRes/7038A0CA78622833C12571B6006D3428?OpenDocument |title=Usnesení vlády České republiky ze dne 12. května 1999 č. 472 k návrhu postupu řešení situace jaderné elektrárny Temelín |publisher=Kormoran.vlada.cz |date=12 May 1999 |accessdate=4 December 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120303145256/http://kormoran.vlada.cz/usneseni/usneseni_webtest.nsf/WebGovRes/7038A0CA78622833C12571B6006D3428?OpenDocument |archive-date=3 March 2012 |url-status=live}}</ref> The project was controversial; national and international (mainly Austrian) opposition was stronger than in the early 1990s, and public opinion on the project fluctuated. In a 1999 opinion poll, 47% of Czech citizens were in favour and 53% against nuclear power development, a fall from 1994. In subsequent years, the same poll showed 63% in favour and 37% against in 2000 and 58% in favour and 42% against in 2001.<ref name=stem/>


In 1998 construction was not completed and costs reached 71 CZK billion. The Czech government again reconsidered completion of the plant.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://kormoran.vlada.cz/usneseni/usneseni_webtest.nsf/WebGovRes/2C601D0777983566C12571B6006BD92C?OpenDocument |title=USNESENÍ VLÁDY ČESKÉ REPUBLIKY ze dne 12. srpna 1998 č. 516 o postupu nezávislého posouzení projektu dostavby jaderné elektrárny Temelín |publisher=Kormoran.vlada.cz |date=12 August 1998 |accessdate=4 December 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120303145248/http://kormoran.vlada.cz/usneseni/usneseni_webtest.nsf/WebGovRes/2C601D0777983566C12571B6006BD92C?OpenDocument |archive-date=3 March 2012 |url-status=live}}</ref> In 1999 the decision was made to continue, hoping for an expected completion in 2000 with a maximum cost of 98.6 CZK billion.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://kormoran.vlada.cz/usneseni/usneseni_webtest.nsf/WebGovRes/7038A0CA78622833C12571B6006D3428?OpenDocument |title=USNESENÍ VLÁDY ČESKÉ REPUBLIKY ze dne 12. května 1999 č. 472 k návrhu postupu řešení situace jaderné elektrárny Temelín |publisher=Kormoran.vlada.cz |date=12 May 1999 |accessdate=4 December 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120303145256/http://kormoran.vlada.cz/usneseni/usneseni_webtest.nsf/WebGovRes/7038A0CA78622833C12571B6006D3428?OpenDocument |archive-date=3 March 2012 |url-status=live}}</ref> The project was controversial; national and international (mainly Austrian) opposition was stronger than in the early 1990s. In a 1999 opinion poll 47% of Czech citizens were in favor and 53% against nuclear power development, a fall from 1994. In subsequent years the same poll showed change to 63% in favor and 37% against in 2000 with 58% in favor and 42% against in 2001, indicating fluctuation of opinion.<ref name=stem/>
In September and October 2000, Austrian [[anti-nuclear]] protesters demonstrated against the Temelín Nuclear Power Plant and at one stage temporarily blocked all 26 border crossings between Austria and the Czech Republic.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/926434.stm |title=Anti-nuclear protest on Czech border |work=BBC News |date=15 September 2000 |accessdate=4 December 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140202223229/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/926434.stm |archive-date=2 February 2014 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/963826.stm |title=Austrian anti-nuclear protests continue |work=BBC News |date=14 October 2000 |accessdate=4 December 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140202223226/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/963826.stm |archive-date=2 February 2014 |url-status=live}}</ref>
In September and October 2000, Austrian [[anti-nuclear]] protesters demonstrated against the Temelín Nuclear Power Plant and at one stage temporarily blocked all 26 border crossings between Austria and the Czech Republic.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/926434.stm |title=Anti-nuclear protest on Czech border |work=BBC News |date=15 September 2000 |accessdate=4 December 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140202223229/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/926434.stm |archive-date=2 February 2014 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/963826.stm |title=Austrian anti-nuclear protests continue |work=BBC News |date=14 October 2000 |accessdate=4 December 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140202223226/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/963826.stm |archive-date=2 February 2014 |url-status=live}}</ref>

As a result of cost overruns, political changes, and design changes to the plant, reactor 1 began commercial operations in June 2002, and reactor 2 on 18 April 2003. As of 2023, the two reactors had produced 272 TWh, or 272.000.000.000 kWh of electricity, with no CO2 emissions. <ref>{{cite web | url=https://pris.iaea.org/PRIS/CountryStatistics/CountryDetails.aspx?current=CZ | title=PRIS – Country Details }}</ref> Assuming a price level of CZK 2 per kWh, this amounted to 544 billion CZK. As the initial investment was CZK 100 billion, the plant had turned a profit. In 2022 alone, the operators of the plant earned CZK 80 billion, as a result of the [[Russian invasion of Ukraine]] and the resulting energy crisis.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.cez.cz/en/media/press-releases/cez-group-earned-over-czk-80-billion-in-2022-will-pay-more-than-czk-100-billion-to-the-czech-state-this-year-174285 | title=ČEZ Group earned over CZK 80 billion in 2022, will pay more than CZK 100 billion to the Czech State this year }}</ref>


===Melk Protocol===
===Melk Protocol===
The Melk Protocol, signed on 12 December 2000 in [[Melk]], [[Lower Austria]], is the result of negotiations between the [[Czech Republic|Czech]] and [[Austria]]n Governments, led by Czech Prime Minister [[Miloš Zeman]] and Austrian Chancellor [[Wolfgang Schüssel]], with the participation of [[European Commissioner]] [[Günter Verheugen]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/P-6-2006-1775-ASW_EN.html |title=P-1775/2006 |date=2006-05-19 |publisher=European Parliament |author=<!--Not stated--> |access-date=2022-03-04 |quote="The Melk Protocol is a bilateral agreement which was signed on 12 December 2000 by the Czech Prime Minister and the Austrian Chancellor. The Commission was present, offering its good offices to mediate between both parties. The Melk Process was followed up by a meeting of the Czech Prime Minister, the Austrian Chancellor and the Commission on 29 November 2001, where ‘conclusions of Melk Process and follow-up’ were signed by both parties (so-called Brussels Protocol)."}}</ref> The aim of the protocol was to resolve disputes over the Temelín plant, whose construction Austria fundamentally opposed.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/P-6-2006-1775-ASW_EN.html |title=P-1775/2006 |date=2006-05-19 |publisher=European Parliament |author=<!--Not stated--> |access-date=2022-03-04 |quote="The role of the Commission in the mediation process leading up to the Protocol was not to evaluate the technical safety of the Temelin power plant, but rather one of a political nature, to facilitate the dialogue and exchange of information between Austria and the Czech Republic, in order to both identify the main issues of concern and to find solutions to the problems which were identified. Procedures were agreed bilaterally in order to follow up the implementation of improvements which might take more time to be completed. The subsequent monitoring of the Melk provisions, extended to the public, is considered as a model of bilateral transparency."}}</ref> The Czech Republic committed itself to some above-standard procedures (e.g., notification of events at Temelín to Austria, and a more stringent [[environmental impact assessment]]). Consequently, Austria recognised the importance of EU enlargement and agreed that the free movement of goods and people must be preserved (this clause was a response to the blockade of Czech-Austrian border crossings by Austrian [[Anti-nuclear movement|anti-nuclear activists]]).<ref>{{cite web |url=https://cesky.radio.cz/cr-a-rakousko-uzavrely-proces-z-melku-8538847 |title=ČR a Rakousko uzavřely proces z Melku |date=2001-11-30 |publisher=Radio Prague International |last=Faltýnek |first=Vilém |access-date=2022-03-04 |quote="Verheugen oznámil, že Evropská komise hned v pátek předloží členským státům návrh společné pozice vůči ČR v kapitole energetika s doporučením ji uzavřít. Rakouská strana se zavázala, že tomu nebude bránit."}}</ref> The protocol is not legally binding.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://cesky.radio.cz/cr-a-rakousko-uzavrely-proces-z-melku-8538847 |title=ČR a Rakousko uzavřely proces z Melku |date=2001-11-30 |publisher=Radio Prague International |last=Faltýnek |first=Vilém |access-date=2022-03-04 |quote="Příslušná pasáž závěrečného prohlášení říká, že "Rakousko a Česká republika se shodují na společném cíli zařadit bilaterální povinnosti obsažené v tomto dokumentu do protokolu k přístupové dohodě". Jde v podstatě pouze o dohodu o budoucím záměru."}}</ref>
The Melk Protocol, signed on 12 December 2000 in [[Melk]], Austria, is the result of negotiations between the Czech and Austrian governments, led by Czech prime minister [[Miloš Zeman]] and Austrian chancellor [[Wolfgang Schüssel]], with the participation of [[European Commissioner]] [[Günter Verheugen]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/P-6-2006-1775-ASW_EN.html |title=P-1775/2006 |date=19 May 2006 |publisher=European Parliament |author=<!--Not stated--> |access-date=4 March 2022 |quote="The Melk Protocol is a bilateral agreement which was signed on 12 December 2000 by the Czech Prime Minister and the Austrian Chancellor. The Commission was present, offering its good offices to mediate between both parties. The Melk Process was followed up by a meeting of the Czech Prime Minister, the Austrian chancellor and the commission on 29 November 2001, where 'conclusions of Melk Process and follow-up' were signed by both parties (so-called Brussels Protocol)."}}</ref> The aim of the protocol was to resolve disputes over the Temelín plant, with Austria raising several concerns about its safety and procedures.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/P-6-2006-1775-ASW_EN.html |title=P-1775/2006 |date=19 May 2006 |publisher=European Parliament |author=<!--Not stated--> |access-date=4 March 2022 |quote="The role of the Commission in the mediation process leading up to the Protocol was not to evaluate the technical safety of the Temelin power plant, but rather one of a political nature, to facilitate the dialogue and exchange of information between Austria and the Czech Republic, in order to both identify the main issues of concern and to find solutions to the problems which were identified. Procedures were agreed bilaterally in order to follow up the implementation of improvements which might take more time to be completed. The subsequent monitoring of the Melk provisions, extended to the public, is considered as a model of bilateral transparency."}}</ref> The Czech Republic committed itself to some above-standard procedures (e.g., notification of events at Temelín to Austria, and a more stringent [[environmental impact assessment]]). Consequently, Austria recognised the importance of EU enlargement and agreed that the free movement of goods and people must be preserved (this clause was a response to the blockade of Czech–Austrian border crossings by Austrian anti-nuclear activists). The protocol is not legally binding.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://cesky.radio.cz/cr-a-rakousko-uzavrely-proces-z-melku-8538847 |title=ČR a Rakousko uzavřely proces z Melku |date=30 November 2001 |publisher=Radio Prague International |last=Faltýnek |first=Vilém |access-date=4 March 2022 |quote="Verheugen oznámil, že Evropská komise hned v pátek předloží členským státům návrh společné pozice vůči ČR v kapitole energetika s doporučením ji uzavřít. Rakouská strana se zavázala, že tomu nebude bránit."}}</ref>

The first unit was finally commissioned in 2000 and the second in 2002.<ref name=hist/>


==Technical data==
==Technical data==
[[File:JETE-chladici veze.jpg|thumbnail|Cooling towers at Temelin NPP]]
[[File:JETE-chladici veze.jpg|thumbnail|Cooling towers at Temelin NPP]]


Most information was taken from ČEZ website<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cez.cz/en/power-plants-and-environment/nuclear-power-plants/temelin.html |title=CEZ Group &#124; Temelín |publisher=Cez.cz |accessdate=4 December 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120124082234/http://www.cez.cz/en/power-plants-and-environment/nuclear-power-plants/temelin.html |archive-date=24 January 2012 |url-status=live}}</ref> Others from leaflet "Energy from South Bohemia" by ČEZ Group and the [[IAEA]] PRIS database. In 2013 the reactors were uprated from 3,000 MW thermal output to 3,120 MW output, bringing the total output to 1003 MWe net and 1056 MWe gross.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.iaea.org/PRIS/CountryStatistics/ReactorDetails.aspx?current=74 |title=PRIS - Czech Republic |publisher=IAEA |accessdate=15 September 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150509175542/http://www.iaea.org/PRIS/CountryStatistics/ReactorDetails.aspx?current=74 |archive-date=9 May 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://ftp.vver2013.com/VVER%202013%20-%20Day%20II.,%20Parallel%20Section%20I.,%20PDF/Bica%20M.%20-%20presentation%202.pdf|title=Temelín Power Update|last=Bica|first=Martin|date=Nov 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180508185438/http://ftp.vver2013.com/VVER%202013%20-%20Day%20II.,%20Parallel%20Section%20I.,%20PDF/Bica%20M.%20-%20presentation%202.pdf|archive-date=8 May 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2015 [[turbomachinery]] was updated, bringing the total output to the current 1026 MWe net and 1080 MWe gross.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://oenergetice.cz/jaderne-elektrarny/temelin-pripojil-k-prvnimu-bloku-ctyri-chladici-veze/|title=Temelín reaguje na horko připojením čtyř chladicích věží k prvnímu bloku|date=2016-07-21|work=OEnergetice.cz|access-date=2018-05-08|language=cs|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180509012452/http://oenergetice.cz/jaderne-elektrarny/temelin-pripojil-k-prvnimu-bloku-ctyri-chladici-veze/|archive-date=9 May 2018|url-status=live}}</ref>
In 2013, the reactors were uprated from 3,000 MW thermal output to 3,120 MW, bringing the total output to 1,003 MWe net and 1,056 MWe gross.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cez.cz/en/power-plants-and-environment/nuclear-power-plants/temelin.html |title=CEZ Group &#124; Temelín |publisher=Cez.cz |accessdate=4 December 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120124082234/http://www.cez.cz/en/power-plants-and-environment/nuclear-power-plants/temelin.html |archive-date=24 January 2012 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.iaea.org/PRIS/CountryStatistics/ReactorDetails.aspx?current=74 |title=PRIS Czech Republic |publisher=IAEA |accessdate=15 September 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150509175542/http://www.iaea.org/PRIS/CountryStatistics/ReactorDetails.aspx?current=74 |archive-date=9 May 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://ftp.vver2013.com/VVER%202013%20-%20Day%20II.,%20Parallel%20Section%20I.,%20PDF/Bica%20M.%20-%20presentation%202.pdf|title=Temelín Power Update|last=Bica|first=Martin|date=Nov 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180508185438/http://ftp.vver2013.com/VVER%202013%20-%20Day%20II.,%20Parallel%20Section%20I.,%20PDF/Bica%20M.%20-%20presentation%202.pdf|archive-date=8 May 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2015, [[turbomachinery]] was updated, bringing total output to the current 1,026 MWe net and 1,080 MWe gross.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://oenergetice.cz/jaderne-elektrarny/temelin-pripojil-k-prvnimu-bloku-ctyri-chladici-veze/|title=Temelín reaguje na horko připojením čtyř chladicích věží k prvnímu bloku|date=21 July 2016|work=OEnergetice.cz|access-date=8 May 2018|language=cs|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180509012452/http://oenergetice.cz/jaderne-elektrarny/temelin-pripojil-k-prvnimu-bloku-ctyri-chladici-veze/|archive-date=9 May 2018|url-status=live}}</ref>


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
!Station || Reactor type || Net capacity<ref name=iaea>{{cite web |url=http://www.iaea.org/cgi-bin/db.page.pl/pris.powrea.htm?country=CZ&sort=&sortlong=Alphabetic |title=Czech Republic: Nuclear Power Reactors – Alphabetic |publisher=IAEA |accessdate=4 December 2011 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110604091232/http://www.iaea.org/cgi-bin/db.page.pl/pris.powrea.htm?country=CZ&sort=&sortlong=Alphabetic |archivedate=4 June 2011}}</ref> || Gross capacity<ref name=iaea/> || Thermal Output || Initial criticality || Grid date || Exp. shutdown
!Station || Reactor type || Net capacity<ref name=iaea>{{cite web |url=http://www.iaea.org/cgi-bin/db.page.pl/pris.powrea.htm?country=CZ&sort=&sortlong=Alphabetic |title=Czech Republic: Nuclear Power Reactors – Alphabetic |publisher=IAEA |accessdate=4 December 2011 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110604091232/http://www.iaea.org/cgi-bin/db.page.pl/pris.powrea.htm?country=CZ&sort=&sortlong=Alphabetic |archivedate=4 June 2011}}</ref> || Gross capacity<ref name=iaea/> || Thermal output || Initial criticality || Grid date || Exp. shutdown
|-
|-
|Temelín 1||[[VVER]] 1000 type V 320 PW|| 1026&nbsp;[[MWe]] || 1080&nbsp;MWe || 3120 MW || Dec 2000||Jun 2002||2062
|Temelín 1||[[VVER]] 1000 type V 320 PW|| 1,026&nbsp;[[MWe]] || 1,080&nbsp;MWe || 3,120 MW || Dec 2000||Jun 2002||2062
|-
|-
|Temelín 2||VVER 1000 type V 320 PW|| 1026&nbsp;MWe || 1080&nbsp;MWe || 3120 MW ||Dec 2002||Apr 2003||2063<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Temelin-2-clear-for-longer-operation | title=Temelín 2 clear for longer operation : Regulation & Safety - World Nuclear News}}</ref>
|Temelín 2||VVER 1000 type V 320 PW|| 1,026&nbsp;MWe || 1,080&nbsp;MWe || 3,120 MW ||Dec 2002||Apr 2003||2063<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Temelin-2-clear-for-longer-operation | title=Temelín 2 clear for longer operation: Regulation & Safety World Nuclear News}}</ref>
|}
|}


=== The reactor vessel (core) ===
===Reactor vessel (core)===
* The reactor contains 163 fuel assemblies and 61 control rod assemblies.
* The reactor contains 163 fuel assemblies and 61 control rod assemblies.
* A single assembly has the shape of ~4.5m long hexagonal and inside are 312 fuel rods.
* A single assembly has the shape of ~4.5m long hexagon, and inside are 312 fuel rods.
* The fuel rods contain stacked cylindrical fuel pellets.
* The fuel rods contain stacked cylindrical fuel pellets.
* Fuel enrichment: max. 5% (average 3.5%) of <sup>235</sup>U (fissile isotope).
* Fuel enrichment: max. 5% (average 3.5%) of <sup>235</sup>U (fissile isotope)
* Fuel load [[Uranium dioxide|UO<sub>2</sub>]]: 92t (The reactor splits about 3&nbsp;kg of uranium every day).
* Fuel load [[Uranium dioxide|UO<sub>2</sub>]]: 92t (the reactor splits about 3&nbsp;kg of uranium every day).
* Fuel Replacement cycle: 4 years (1/4 is changed yearly).
* Fuel replacement cycle: 4 years (1/4 is changed yearly).
* Vessel height: ~11m, outside diameter: ~4.5m, wall thickness: 193&nbsp;mm.
* Vessel height: ~11m; outside diameter: ~4.5m; wall thickness: 193&nbsp;mm.
* The vessel is designed for up to 17.6MPa at 350&nbsp;°C.
* The vessel is designed for up to 17.6MPa at 350&nbsp;°C.
* The vessel is made of high quality, low-alloy chrome-nickel-molybdenum-vanadium steel.
* The vessel is made of high-quality, low-alloy chrome-nickel-molybdenum-vanadium steel.
* For the reactor to produce 1W of thermal output, 30 billion fissions of uranium-235 must take place every second. For a coal power station to produce the same output 1,500,000,000 billion carbon atoms must be burned.
* For the reactor to produce 1W of thermal output, 30 billion fissions of uranium-235 must take place every second. For a coal power station to produce the same output, 1,500,000,000 billion carbon atoms must be burned.


=== Reactor cooling system ===
===Reactor cooling system===
* '''Number of cooling loops:''' 4
* '''Number of cooling loops:''' 4
* '''Quantity of primary circuit coolant:''' 337 m<sup>3</sup>
* '''Quantity of primary circuit coolant:''' 337 m<sup>3</sup>
* '''Operating pressure:''' 15.7MPa
* '''Operating pressure:''' 15.7MPa
* '''Coolant inlet temperature:''' approx. 290&nbsp;°C (554F)
* '''Coolant inlet temperature:''' approx. 290&nbsp;°C (554F)
* '''Coolant outlet temperature:''' approx. 320&nbsp;°C (608F)
* '''Coolant outlet temperature:''' approx. 320&nbsp;°C (608F)
* '''Coolant flow through reactor:''' 23.5 m<sup>3</sup>/s
* '''Coolant flow through reactor:''' 23.5 m<sup>3</sup>/s


=== Steam generator ===
===Steam generator===
* '''Number per reactor unit:''' 4
* '''Number per reactor unit:''' 4
* '''Steam delivered per one generator:''' 1470 t/hour
* '''Steam delivered per one generator:''' 1,470 t/hour
* '''Steam outlet pressure:''' 6.3MPa
* '''Steam outlet pressure:''' 6.3MPa
* '''Steam outlet temperature:''' 278.5&nbsp;°C (533.3F)
* '''Steam outlet temperature:''' 278.5&nbsp;°C (533.3F)


=== Cooling circuit ===
===Cooling circuit===
* The plant has 4 cooling towers (each unit has 2 towers).
* The plant has four cooling towers (each unit has two towers).
* Each tower has a height of {{convert|150|m|ft|-1}}, a diameter of {{convert|130|m|ft|-1}}, and an external wall surface area of {{convert|44000|m2|sqft}}.
* Each tower has a height of {{convert|150|m|ft|-1}}, a diameter of {{convert|130|m|ft|-1}}, and an external wall surface area of {{convert|44000|m2|sqft}}.
* Pure water is evaporated in cooling tower (~0.3m<sup>3</sup>/s).
* Pure water is evaporated in cooling tower (~0.3m<sup>3</sup>/s).
** The water needs to be constantly refilled.
** The water needs to be constantly refilled.


=== Protective Envelope (containment) ===
===Protective envelope (containment)===
* '''Height of cylindrical section:''' 38m
* '''Height of cylindrical section:''' 38m
* '''Inside diameter of cylindrical section:''' 45m
* '''Inside diameter of cylindrical section:''' 45m
Line 98: Line 100:
* '''Thickness of steel lining:''' 8mm
* '''Thickness of steel lining:''' 8mm


=== Turbine generator set ===
===Turbine generator set===
* '''Number per unit:''' 1
* '''Number per unit:''' 1
* '''Number of steam turbine sections:''' 1 high pressure and 3 low pressure
* '''Number of steam turbine sections:''' 1 high-pressure and 3 low-pressure
* '''Speed:''' 3000 rpm
* '''Speed:''' 3,000 rpm
* '''Voltage on alternator's terminal:''' 24kV
* '''Voltage on alternator's terminal:''' 24kV
* '''Alternator cooling:''' hydrogen – water
* '''Alternator cooling:''' hydrogen – water


==Reliability==
==Reliability==
The [[IAEA|International Atomic Energy Agency]] data show that Reactor 1 reaches a cumulative operating factor of about 63%,<ref>{{cite web |author=PRIS.Contact-Point@iaea.org |url=http://www.iaea.org/cgi-bin/db.page.pl/pris.ophis.htm?country=CZ&site=TEMELIN&units=&refno=23&opyear=2010&link=HOT |title=Temelin Reactor 1 at PRIS |publisher=Iaea.org |accessdate=4 December 2011 }}{{Dead link|date=June 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=no}}</ref> and Reactor 2 an operating factor of about 76%.<ref>{{cite web |author=PRIS.Contact-Point@iaea.org |url=http://www.iaea.org/cgi-bin/db.page.pl/pris.ophis.htm?country=CZ&site=TEMELIN&units=&refno=24&opyear=2010&link=HOT |title=Temelin Reactor 2 at PRIS |publisher=Iaea.org |accessdate=4 December 2011 }}{{Dead link|date=June 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=no}}</ref> The cumulative operating factor figures for Temelín NPP reactors are lower than the figures of similar reactors operated in Russia, where the cumulative operating factor is around 80-87%.<ref>[http://www.iaea.org/cgi-bin/db.page.pl/pris.ophis.htm?country=RU&site=VOLGODONSK&units=&refno=59&opyear=2010&link=HOT Rostov Reactor 1]{{Dead link|date=June 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=no}}, Iaea.org</ref><ref>[http://www.iaea.org/cgi-bin/db.page.pl/pris.ophis.htm?country=RU&site=KALININ&units=&refno=36&opyear=2010&link=HOT Kalinin Reactor 3]{{Dead link|date=June 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=no}}, Iaea.org</ref>
[[International Atomic Energy Agency|IAEA]] data show that reactor 1 reaches a cumulative operating factor of about 63%,<ref>{{cite web |author=PRIS.Contact-Point@iaea.org |url=http://www.iaea.org/cgi-bin/db.page.pl/pris.ophis.htm?country=CZ&site=TEMELIN&units=&refno=23&opyear=2010&link=HOT |title=Temelin Reactor 1 at PRIS |publisher=Iaea.org |accessdate=4 December 2011 }}{{Dead link|date=June 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=no}}</ref> and reactor 2 of about 76%.<ref>{{cite web |author=PRIS.Contact-Point@iaea.org |url=http://www.iaea.org/cgi-bin/db.page.pl/pris.ophis.htm?country=CZ&site=TEMELIN&units=&refno=24&opyear=2010&link=HOT |title=Temelin Reactor 2 at PRIS |publisher=Iaea.org |accessdate=4 December 2011 }}{{Dead link|date=June 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=no}}</ref> The cumulative operating factor figures for Temelín NPP reactors are lower than the figures of similar reactors operated in Russia, where it is around 80–87%.<ref>[http://www.iaea.org/cgi-bin/db.page.pl/pris.ophis.htm?country=RU&site=VOLGODONSK&units=&refno=59&opyear=2010&link=HOT Rostov Reactor 1]{{Dead link|date=June 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=no}}, Iaea.org</ref><ref>[http://www.iaea.org/cgi-bin/db.page.pl/pris.ophis.htm?country=RU&site=KALININ&units=&refno=36&opyear=2010&link=HOT Kalinin Reactor 3]{{Dead link|date=June 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=no}}, Iaea.org</ref>


ČEZ had increased operating factor and production in recent years and the plant reached 84% in 2012 with a total record production of 15 TWh.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.cez.cz/cs/pro-media/aktuality-z-jadernych-elektraren/11689.html |title=Temelín vyrobil v roce 2012 rekordní množství elektřiny |access-date=12 January 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130121160301/http://www.cez.cz/cs/pro-media/aktuality-z-jadernych-elektraren/11689.html |archive-date=21 January 2013 |url-status=live}}</ref>
ČEZ has increased the operating factor as well as production in recent years, and the plant reached 84% in 2012, with a total record production of 15 TWh.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.cez.cz/cs/pro-media/aktuality-z-jadernych-elektraren/11689.html |title=Temelín vyrobil v roce 2012 rekordní množství elektřiny |access-date=12 January 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130121160301/http://www.cez.cz/cs/pro-media/aktuality-z-jadernych-elektraren/11689.html |archive-date=21 January 2013 |url-status=live}}</ref>


==New reactors==
==New reactors==
Plans to build all four original reactors were reopened in 2005. However, in 2014 the prospective plans were cancelled.
Plans to build all four original reactors were reopened in 2005. However, in 2014, the prospective plans were cancelled.

In 2007, planning was suspended because the incoming government agreed not to promote nuclear energy. However, in July 2008, ČEZ requested the [[Ministry of the Environment (Czech Republic)|Ministry of the Environment]] conduct an [[environmental impact assessment]] for two additional reactors.<ref>{{cite news| url= http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/NN-CEZ_requests_EIA_for_expansion_of_Temelin-1407084.html| title= CEZ requests EIA for expansion of Temelin| work= [[World Nuclear News]]| date= 14 July 2008| accessdate= 9 August 2008| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090105223758/http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/NN-CEZ_requests_EIA_for_expansion_of_Temelin-1407084.html| archive-date= 5 January 2009| url-status= live}}</ref> In 2009, regional approval was granted for the new build. In August 2009, ČEZ sought bids for two [[pressurized water reactor]]s.<ref>{{cite news | url= http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/NN-Tender_launched_for_Temelin_expansion-0308094.html | title= Tender launched for Temelin expansion | date= 3 August 2009 | work= World Nuclear News | accessdate= 3 August 2009 | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20091101060633/http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/NN-Tender_launched_for_Temelin_expansion-0308094.html| archive-date= 1 November 2009 | url-status= live}}</ref> Shortly after the [[Fukushima nuclear accident]], prime minister [[Petr Nečas]] announced that the construction of new reactors would continue according to original plans<ref>{{cite web |author=jw |url=http://zpravy.idnes.cz/temelin-dostavime-vzkazal-po-havarii-fukusimy-premier-necas-p5e-/domaci.asp?c=A110317_144606_domaci_jw |title=Temelín dostavíme, vzkázal po havárii Fukušimy premiér Nečas – iDNES.cz |work=Mladá fronta DNES | date=17 March 2011 |accessdate=4 December 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110322092146/http://zpravy.idnes.cz/temelin-dostavime-vzkazal-po-havarii-fukusimy-premier-necas-p5e-/domaci.asp?c=A110317_144606_domaci_jw |archive-date=22 March 2011 |url-status=live}}</ref> but with the tender selection delayed until 2013.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://praguemonitor.com/2011/02/21/%C4%8Dez-delays-temel%C3%ADn-completion-deadline-5-yrs-2025 |title=ČEZ delays Temelín completion deadline by 5 yrs to 2025 |date=21 February 2011 |newspaper=Prague Daily Monitor |accessdate=23 September 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120326015901/http://praguemonitor.com/2011/02/21/%C4%8Dez-delays-temel%C3%ADn-completion-deadline-5-yrs-2025 |archive-date=26 March 2012 |url-status=dead }}</ref>


In July 2012, ČEZ opened public-contract bids for completing the Temelín Nuclear Power Plant in the presence of the bidders—[[Areva]]; a consortium of the [[Westinghouse Electric Company]]; and a consortium of [[ŠKODA JS]], [[Atomstroyexport]], and [[OKB Gidropress|Gidropress]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cez.cz/en/cez-group/media/press-releases/3867.html |title=CEZ Group &#124; ČEZ Has Today Opened Bids from Three Qualified Bidders Interested in Completing the Temelín NPP and have Thus Started the Bid Evaluation Process |publisher=Cez.cz |accessdate=7 March 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121102133950/http://www.cez.cz/en/cez-group/media/press-releases/3867.html |archive-date=2 November 2012 |url-status=live}}</ref> In October 2012, Areva's bid was excluded from further evaluation, as they had not met statutory requirements.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cez.cz/en/cez-group/media/press-releases/3972.html |title=CEZ Group &#124; Areva Failed to Comply with Public Contract Requirements Defined for Building Temelín NPP Units 3 and 4; ČEZ Had to Disqualify This Bidder |publisher=Cez.cz |date=17 January 2014 |accessdate=7 March 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121101040855/http://www.cez.cz/en/cez-group/media/press-releases/3972.html |archive-date=1 November 2012 |url-status=live}}</ref>
In 2007 planning was suspended because a new government agreed not to promote nuclear energy; a [[Green Party (Czech Republic)|Green Party]] was a member of the coalition government. However, in July 2008 ČEZ requested the Ministry of the Environment conduct an [[environmental impact assessment]] for two additional reactors.<ref>{{cite news| url= http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/NN-CEZ_requests_EIA_for_expansion_of_Temelin-1407084.html| title= CEZ requests EIA for expansion of Temelin| work= [[World Nuclear News]]| date= 2008-07-14| accessdate= 2008-08-09| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090105223758/http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/NN-CEZ_requests_EIA_for_expansion_of_Temelin-1407084.html| archive-date= 5 January 2009| url-status= live}}</ref> In 2009 regional approval was granted for the new build.
In August 2009, ČEZ sought bids for two [[pressurized water reactor]]s (PWRs).<ref>{{cite news | url= http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/NN-Tender_launched_for_Temelin_expansion-0308094.html | title= Tender launched for Temelin expansion | date= 3 August 2009 | work= World Nuclear News | accessdate= 2009-08-03 | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20091101060633/http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/NN-Tender_launched_for_Temelin_expansion-0308094.html| archive-date= 1 November 2009 | url-status= live}}</ref>
Shortly after the [[Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster|Fukushima nuclear accidents]], Prime Minister [[Petr Nečas]] announced that the construction of new reactors will continue according to the original plans,<ref>{{cite web |author=jw |url=http://zpravy.idnes.cz/temelin-dostavime-vzkazal-po-havarii-fukusimy-premier-necas-p5e-/domaci.asp?c=A110317_144606_domaci_jw |title=Temelín dostavíme, vzkázal po havárii Fukušimy premiér Nečas – iDNES.cz |work=Mladá fronta DNES | date=17 March 2011 |accessdate=4 December 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110322092146/http://zpravy.idnes.cz/temelin-dostavime-vzkazal-po-havarii-fukusimy-premier-necas-p5e-/domaci.asp?c=A110317_144606_domaci_jw |archive-date=22 March 2011 |url-status=live}}</ref> but with the tender selection delayed to 2013.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://praguemonitor.com/2011/02/21/%C4%8Dez-delays-temel%C3%ADn-completion-deadline-5-yrs-2025 |title=ČEZ delays Temelín completion deadline by 5 yrs to 2025 |date=21 February 2011 |newspaper=Prague Daily Monitor |accessdate=23 September 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120326015901/http://praguemonitor.com/2011/02/21/%C4%8Dez-delays-temel%C3%ADn-completion-deadline-5-yrs-2025 |archive-date=26 March 2012 |url-status=dead |df=dmy-all }}</ref>


In March 2013, a Russian-led consortium, comprising Atomstroyexport, Gidropress, and [[Doosan Škoda Power|Škoda]], signed contracts with the Czech companies ZAT, [[Hochtief|Hochtief CZ]], and UJV Rez, for the construction of two new nuclear reactor units for Temelín-3 and Temelín-4, both of which being [[MIR-1200]] (Modernised International Reactor). ZAT would supply automated systems for the plant, Hochtief CZ would be responsible for construction of the nuclear island, and UJV Rez would help compile project documentation for the nuclear and turbine islands and also create working documentation for construction of the plant. A statement said the consortium was aiming for a "localisation level" of 75 percent. The other running project for the contract was Westinghouse, with its [[AP1000]] reactor. The winner of the contract was scheduled to be announced at the end of 2013.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nucnet.org/all-the-news/2013/03/15/mir-1200-consortium-signs-temel-n-contracts-with-czech-companies |title=MIR-1200 Consortium Signs Temelín Contracts With Czech Companies |publisher=Nucnet.org |date=2 July 2012 |accessdate=7 March 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131019090015/http://www.nucnet.org/all-the-news/2013/03/15/mir-1200-consortium-signs-temel-n-contracts-with-czech-companies |archive-date=19 October 2013 |url-status=live}}</ref>
In July 2012 ČEZ opened bids for the public contract for completing the Temelín Nuclear Power Plant in the presence of the bidders - [[Areva]], a consortium of the [[Westinghouse Electric Company]], LLC and WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC ČR, and a consortium of [[ŠKODA JS]], [[Atomstroyexport]], and [[OKB Gidropress|Gidropress]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cez.cz/en/cez-group/media/press-releases/3867.html |title=CEZ Group &#124; ČEZ Has Today Opened Bids From Three Qualified Bidders Interested in Completing the Temelín NPP and have Thus Started the Bid Evaluation Process |publisher=Cez.cz |accessdate=2014-03-07 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121102133950/http://www.cez.cz/en/cez-group/media/press-releases/3867.html |archive-date=2 November 2012 |url-status=live}}</ref>
In October 2012 ČEZ informed Areva that they have in their bid failed to meet statutory requirements. Moreover, Areva has not fulfilled some other crucial criteria defined in the tender. Since the award procedure has been conducted in accordance with the Public Procurement Act, Areva's bid had to be excluded from further evaluation.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cez.cz/en/cez-group/media/press-releases/3972.html |title=CEZ Group &#124; Areva Failed to Comply with Public Contract Requirements Defined for Building Temelín NPP Units 3 and 4; ČEZ Had to Disqualify This Bidder |publisher=Cez.cz |date=2014-01-17 |accessdate=2014-03-07 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121101040855/http://www.cez.cz/en/cez-group/media/press-releases/3972.html |archive-date=1 November 2012 |url-status=live}}</ref>


In April 2014, ČEZ cancelled the project after the Czech government stated it did not plan to provide guarantees or other mechanisms to support the construction of low-emission power plants following discussions in the EU. The ČEZ CEO stated:
In March 2013, a Russian led consortium, comprising Atomstroyexport, Gidropress and Skoda, signed contracts with the three Czech companies ZAT, HOCHTIEF CZ and UJV Rez, for the construction of the two new nuclear reactor units for Temelín-3 and Temelín-4. The reactors proposed are the [[MIR-1200]] (Modernised International Reactor).
ZAT would supply automated systems for the plant, HOCHTIEF CZ would be responsible for construction of the nuclear island, and UJV Rez would help compile project documentation for the nuclear and turbine islands, and also create working documentation for construction of the plant. A statement said the consortium is aiming for a "localisation level" of 75 percent.
The other running project for the contract was Westinghouse with its AP1000 reactor. The winner of the contract was scheduled to be announced at the end of 2013.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nucnet.org/all-the-news/2013/03/15/mir-1200-consortium-signs-temel-n-contracts-with-czech-companies |title=MIR-1200 Consortium Signs Temelín Contracts With Czech Companies |publisher=Nucnet.org |date=2012-07-02 |accessdate=2014-03-07 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131019090015/http://www.nucnet.org/all-the-news/2013/03/15/mir-1200-consortium-signs-temel-n-contracts-with-czech-companies |archive-date=19 October 2013 |url-status=live}}</ref>


{{blockquote|While originally the project was fully economically feasible given the market price of electricity and other factors, today all investments into power plants, whose revenues depend on sales of electricity in the free market, are threatened.<ref name=nei-20140411>{{cite news |url=http://www.neimagazine.com/news/newscez-cancels-temelin-34-project-4213193 |title=CEZ cancels Temelin 3&4 project |publisher=Nuclear Engineering International |date=11 April 2014 |accessdate=16 April 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140416210440/http://www.neimagazine.com/news/newscez-cancels-temelin-34-project-4213193 |archive-date=16 April 2014 |url-status=live}}</ref>}}
In April 2014, ČEZ cancelled the project after the Czech government stated it does not plan to provide guarantees or other mechanisms to support the construction of low-emission power plants following discussions in the EU. The ČEZ CEO stated:
{{blockquote|While originally the project was fully economically feasible given the market price of electricity and other factors, today all investments into power plants, which revenues depend on sales of electricity in the free market, are threatened.<ref name=nei-20140411>{{cite news |url=http://www.neimagazine.com/news/newscez-cancels-temelin-34-project-4213193 |title=CEZ cancels Temelin 3&4 project |publisher=Nuclear Engineering International |date=11 April 2014 |accessdate=16 April 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140416210440/http://www.neimagazine.com/news/newscez-cancels-temelin-34-project-4213193 |archive-date=16 April 2014 |url-status=live}}</ref>}}


In 2021, Westinghouse was contracted to upgrade the instrumentation and control (I&C) systems in a 9-year project.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.neimagazine.com/news/newswestinghouse-to-upgrade-temelin-npps-ic-systems-9086644 |title=Westinghouse to upgrade Temelin NPP's I&C systems |publisher=Nuclear Engineering International |date=16 September 2021 |access-date=22 September 2021}}</ref>
In 2021, Westinghouse was contracted to upgrade the instrumentation and control systems of the power plant in a nine-year project.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.neimagazine.com/news/newswestinghouse-to-upgrade-temelin-npps-ic-systems-9086644 |title=Westinghouse to upgrade Temelin NPP's I&C systems |publisher=Nuclear Engineering International |date=16 September 2021 |access-date=22 September 2021}}</ref>


==See also==
==See also==
Line 133: Line 131:
* [[Nuclear power in the Czech Republic]]
* [[Nuclear power in the Czech Republic]]
* [[Energy in the Czech Republic]]
* [[Energy in the Czech Republic]]
* [[Dukovany Nuclear Power Station]] – another nuclear power plant in the [[Czech Republic]]
* [[Dukovany Nuclear Power Station]]


==References==
==References==
Line 140: Line 138:
==External links==
==External links==
{{Commons category|Temelín Nuclear Power Station}}
{{Commons category|Temelín Nuclear Power Station}}
* {{Official website|cez.cz/cs/o-cez/infocentra/temelin-136405}}
* [http://www.cez.cz/en/power-plants-and-environment/nuclear-power-plants/temelin.html Official info on website of ČEZ]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20080312220306/http://www.prague360.com/fs.html?loc=locations%2Flandmark-life%2Ftemelin-nuclear-power-plant.p36 360 Panorama of Temelin Nuclear Power Plant]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20080312220306/http://www.prague360.com/fs.html?loc=locations%2Flandmark-life%2Ftemelin-nuclear-power-plant.p36 360º panorama of Temelin Nuclear Power Plant]
* [https://www.slideshare.net/myatom/10-years-of-experience-with-westinghouse-fuel-at-npp-temeln 10 Years of Experience with Westinghouse Fuel at NPP Temelin]


{{Authority control}}
{{Authority control}}

Latest revision as of 18:22, 10 November 2024

Temelín Nuclear Power Station
Temelín nuclear power station
Map
CountryCzech Republic
LocationTemelín, South Bohemian Region
Coordinates49°10′48.5″N 14°22′34.4″E / 49.180139°N 14.376222°E / 49.180139; 14.376222
StatusOperational
Construction began1981
Commission date10 June 2002
Construction cost98.6 billion CZK
OperatorČEZ Group
Employees~1,000
Nuclear power station
Reactor typeVVER 1000/320 PWRs
Power generation
Units operational2 x 1080 MWe (gross)[1][2]
Units cancelled2 x 950 MWe
Nameplate capacity
  • 2,250 MW
Capacity factor80.0%
Annual net output14,401 GWh
External links
WebsiteOfficial website
CommonsRelated media on Commons

Temelín Nuclear Power Station (Czech: Jaderná elektrárna Temelín, abbreviation ETE) is a nuclear power plant in Temelín, Czech Republic. It is owned by ČEZ Group, which employs 1,000 workers at the site. The adjacent castle Vysoký Hrádek serves as an information centre.

In 2003, the Temelín Nuclear Power Plant, with its 2,180 MW of installed capacity, became the largest power resource in the Czech Republic and the largest source of zero-emission electricity generation by far.[3][4]

History

[edit]
Model of the plant at the information centre. The light green area was originally intended for the two unbuilt reactors.

Planning for the Temelín Nuclear Power Station began in the late 1970s, and the final project was submitted in 1985. Construction of four operating units began in 1987. The project was expected to be completed in 1991, with estimated building costs of 35 billion CSK.[5] Six villages were demolished by the then-Communist government to make way for the power station.[6]

After the Velvet Revolution in 1990, the Czechoslovak government decided to cease construction of the third and fourth reactors;[7] work continued on the first two reactors, however. In the 1990s, alterations to the original design were made by Westinghouse, in conjunction with SUJB and the IAEA, to bring reliability and safety levels into conformance with Western European standards. The standards audit was carried out by Halliburton NUS. As part of the alterations, information and control systems were added, electrical modifications carried out, and cabling, reactor core, and fuel elements were replaced.[8] In 1993, the Czech government decided to complete the plant in the face of delays and cost overruns, with expected completion at the time estimated for 1997.[9] In 1994, an opinion poll reported that 68% of Czech citizens were in favour of nuclear power development.[10]

By 1998, construction was still not completed, and costs reached 71 billion CZK. The Czech government again reconsidered completion of the plant.[11] In 1999, the decision was made to continue, projecting completion to 2000, with a maximum cost of 98.6 CZK billion.[12] The project was controversial; national and international (mainly Austrian) opposition was stronger than in the early 1990s, and public opinion on the project fluctuated. In a 1999 opinion poll, 47% of Czech citizens were in favour and 53% against nuclear power development, a fall from 1994. In subsequent years, the same poll showed 63% in favour and 37% against in 2000 and 58% in favour and 42% against in 2001.[10]

In September and October 2000, Austrian anti-nuclear protesters demonstrated against the Temelín Nuclear Power Plant and at one stage temporarily blocked all 26 border crossings between Austria and the Czech Republic.[13][14]

As a result of cost overruns, political changes, and design changes to the plant, reactor 1 began commercial operations in June 2002, and reactor 2 on 18 April 2003. As of 2023, the two reactors had produced 272 TWh, or 272.000.000.000 kWh of electricity, with no CO2 emissions. [15] Assuming a price level of CZK 2 per kWh, this amounted to 544 billion CZK. As the initial investment was CZK 100 billion, the plant had turned a profit. In 2022 alone, the operators of the plant earned CZK 80 billion, as a result of the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the resulting energy crisis.[16]

Melk Protocol

[edit]

The Melk Protocol, signed on 12 December 2000 in Melk, Austria, is the result of negotiations between the Czech and Austrian governments, led by Czech prime minister Miloš Zeman and Austrian chancellor Wolfgang Schüssel, with the participation of European Commissioner Günter Verheugen.[17] The aim of the protocol was to resolve disputes over the Temelín plant, with Austria raising several concerns about its safety and procedures.[18] The Czech Republic committed itself to some above-standard procedures (e.g., notification of events at Temelín to Austria, and a more stringent environmental impact assessment). Consequently, Austria recognised the importance of EU enlargement and agreed that the free movement of goods and people must be preserved (this clause was a response to the blockade of Czech–Austrian border crossings by Austrian anti-nuclear activists). The protocol is not legally binding.[19]

Technical data

[edit]
Cooling towers at Temelin NPP

In 2013, the reactors were uprated from 3,000 MW thermal output to 3,120 MW, bringing the total output to 1,003 MWe net and 1,056 MWe gross.[20][21][22] In 2015, turbomachinery was updated, bringing total output to the current 1,026 MWe net and 1,080 MWe gross.[23]

Station Reactor type Net capacity[24] Gross capacity[24] Thermal output Initial criticality Grid date Exp. shutdown
Temelín 1 VVER 1000 type V 320 PW 1,026 MWe 1,080 MWe 3,120 MW Dec 2000 Jun 2002 2062
Temelín 2 VVER 1000 type V 320 PW 1,026 MWe 1,080 MWe 3,120 MW Dec 2002 Apr 2003 2063[25]

Reactor vessel (core)

[edit]
  • The reactor contains 163 fuel assemblies and 61 control rod assemblies.
  • A single assembly has the shape of ~4.5m long hexagon, and inside are 312 fuel rods.
  • The fuel rods contain stacked cylindrical fuel pellets.
  • Fuel enrichment: max. 5% (average 3.5%) of 235U (fissile isotope)
  • Fuel load UO2: 92t (the reactor splits about 3 kg of uranium every day).
  • Fuel replacement cycle: 4 years (1/4 is changed yearly).
  • Vessel height: ~11m; outside diameter: ~4.5m; wall thickness: 193 mm.
  • The vessel is designed for up to 17.6MPa at 350 °C.
  • The vessel is made of high-quality, low-alloy chrome-nickel-molybdenum-vanadium steel.
  • For the reactor to produce 1W of thermal output, 30 billion fissions of uranium-235 must take place every second. For a coal power station to produce the same output, 1,500,000,000 billion carbon atoms must be burned.

Reactor cooling system

[edit]
  • Number of cooling loops: 4
  • Quantity of primary circuit coolant: 337 m3
  • Operating pressure: 15.7MPa
  • Coolant inlet temperature: approx. 290 °C (554F)
  • Coolant outlet temperature: approx. 320 °C (608F)
  • Coolant flow through reactor: 23.5 m3/s

Steam generator

[edit]
  • Number per reactor unit: 4
  • Steam delivered per one generator: 1,470 t/hour
  • Steam outlet pressure: 6.3MPa
  • Steam outlet temperature: 278.5 °C (533.3F)

Cooling circuit

[edit]
  • The plant has four cooling towers (each unit has two towers).
  • Each tower has a height of 150 metres (490 ft), a diameter of 130 metres (430 ft), and an external wall surface area of 44,000 square metres (470,000 sq ft).
  • Pure water is evaporated in cooling tower (~0.3m3/s).
    • The water needs to be constantly refilled.

Protective envelope (containment)

[edit]
  • Height of cylindrical section: 38m
  • Inside diameter of cylindrical section: 45m
  • Wall thickness: 1.2m
  • Thickness of steel lining: 8mm

Turbine generator set

[edit]
  • Number per unit: 1
  • Number of steam turbine sections: 1 high-pressure and 3 low-pressure
  • Speed: 3,000 rpm
  • Voltage on alternator's terminal: 24kV
  • Alternator cooling: hydrogen – water

Reliability

[edit]

IAEA data show that reactor 1 reaches a cumulative operating factor of about 63%,[26] and reactor 2 of about 76%.[27] The cumulative operating factor figures for Temelín NPP reactors are lower than the figures of similar reactors operated in Russia, where it is around 80–87%.[28][29]

ČEZ has increased the operating factor as well as production in recent years, and the plant reached 84% in 2012, with a total record production of 15 TWh.[30]

New reactors

[edit]

Plans to build all four original reactors were reopened in 2005. However, in 2014, the prospective plans were cancelled.

In 2007, planning was suspended because the incoming government agreed not to promote nuclear energy. However, in July 2008, ČEZ requested the Ministry of the Environment conduct an environmental impact assessment for two additional reactors.[31] In 2009, regional approval was granted for the new build. In August 2009, ČEZ sought bids for two pressurized water reactors.[32] Shortly after the Fukushima nuclear accident, prime minister Petr Nečas announced that the construction of new reactors would continue according to original plans[33] but with the tender selection delayed until 2013.[34]

In July 2012, ČEZ opened public-contract bids for completing the Temelín Nuclear Power Plant in the presence of the bidders—Areva; a consortium of the Westinghouse Electric Company; and a consortium of ŠKODA JS, Atomstroyexport, and Gidropress.[35] In October 2012, Areva's bid was excluded from further evaluation, as they had not met statutory requirements.[36]

In March 2013, a Russian-led consortium, comprising Atomstroyexport, Gidropress, and Škoda, signed contracts with the Czech companies ZAT, Hochtief CZ, and UJV Rez, for the construction of two new nuclear reactor units for Temelín-3 and Temelín-4, both of which being MIR-1200 (Modernised International Reactor). ZAT would supply automated systems for the plant, Hochtief CZ would be responsible for construction of the nuclear island, and UJV Rez would help compile project documentation for the nuclear and turbine islands and also create working documentation for construction of the plant. A statement said the consortium was aiming for a "localisation level" of 75 percent. The other running project for the contract was Westinghouse, with its AP1000 reactor. The winner of the contract was scheduled to be announced at the end of 2013.[37]

In April 2014, ČEZ cancelled the project after the Czech government stated it did not plan to provide guarantees or other mechanisms to support the construction of low-emission power plants following discussions in the EU. The ČEZ CEO stated:

While originally the project was fully economically feasible given the market price of electricity and other factors, today all investments into power plants, whose revenues depend on sales of electricity in the free market, are threatened.[38]

In 2021, Westinghouse was contracted to upgrade the instrumentation and control systems of the power plant in a nine-year project.[39]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "PRIS - Reactor Details". iaea.org. Archived from the original on 8 May 2018. Retrieved 8 May 2018.
  2. ^ "PRIS - Reactor Details". iaea.org. Archived from the original on 8 May 2018. Retrieved 8 May 2018.
  3. ^ "CEZ Group | Temelín". Cez.cz. Archived from the original on 25 December 2010. Retrieved 7 March 2014.
  4. ^ "Decarbonization | Sustainability in CEZ Group".
  5. ^ "Temelin nuclear power plant activated". Czech Radio. 12 October 2000. Retrieved 8 February 2023.
  6. ^ "Economic, social and environmental impact of building and functioning of the nuclear power plants Temelín on Southern Bohemia". Theses.cz. Archived from the original on 8 October 2011. Retrieved 4 December 2011.
  7. ^ "Ekolist: Historie výstavby Jaderné elektrárny Temelín". Ekolist.cz. 10 November 2006. Archived from the original on 29 March 2008. Retrieved 4 December 2011.
  8. ^ "Temelin NPP Status: The Challenge of Safety Improvements". The Uranium Institute. 31 December 2000. Archived from the original on 8 April 2009. Retrieved 3 August 2009.
  9. ^ "Usnesení vlády České republiky ze dne 10. března 1993 č. 109 k problematice dostavby jaderné elektrárny Temelín". Kormoran.vlada.cz. 10 March 1993. Archived from the original on 3 March 2012. Retrieved 4 December 2011.
  10. ^ a b "Rozvoj jaderné energetiky u nás podporují necelé tři pětiny občanů". Stem.cz. Archived from the original on 3 March 2012. Retrieved 4 December 2011.
  11. ^ "Usnesení vlády České republiky ze dne 12. srpna 1998 č. 516 o postupu nezávislého posouzení projektu dostavby jaderné elektrárny Temelín". Kormoran.vlada.cz. 12 August 1998. Archived from the original on 3 March 2012. Retrieved 4 December 2011.
  12. ^ "Usnesení vlády České republiky ze dne 12. května 1999 č. 472 k návrhu postupu řešení situace jaderné elektrárny Temelín". Kormoran.vlada.cz. 12 May 1999. Archived from the original on 3 March 2012. Retrieved 4 December 2011.
  13. ^ "Anti-nuclear protest on Czech border". BBC News. 15 September 2000. Archived from the original on 2 February 2014. Retrieved 4 December 2011.
  14. ^ "Austrian anti-nuclear protests continue". BBC News. 14 October 2000. Archived from the original on 2 February 2014. Retrieved 4 December 2011.
  15. ^ "PRIS – Country Details".
  16. ^ "ČEZ Group earned over CZK 80 billion in 2022, will pay more than CZK 100 billion to the Czech State this year".
  17. ^ "P-1775/2006". European Parliament. 19 May 2006. Retrieved 4 March 2022. The Melk Protocol is a bilateral agreement which was signed on 12 December 2000 by the Czech Prime Minister and the Austrian Chancellor. The Commission was present, offering its good offices to mediate between both parties. The Melk Process was followed up by a meeting of the Czech Prime Minister, the Austrian chancellor and the commission on 29 November 2001, where 'conclusions of Melk Process and follow-up' were signed by both parties (so-called Brussels Protocol).
  18. ^ "P-1775/2006". European Parliament. 19 May 2006. Retrieved 4 March 2022. The role of the Commission in the mediation process leading up to the Protocol was not to evaluate the technical safety of the Temelin power plant, but rather one of a political nature, to facilitate the dialogue and exchange of information between Austria and the Czech Republic, in order to both identify the main issues of concern and to find solutions to the problems which were identified. Procedures were agreed bilaterally in order to follow up the implementation of improvements which might take more time to be completed. The subsequent monitoring of the Melk provisions, extended to the public, is considered as a model of bilateral transparency.
  19. ^ Faltýnek, Vilém (30 November 2001). "ČR a Rakousko uzavřely proces z Melku". Radio Prague International. Retrieved 4 March 2022. Verheugen oznámil, že Evropská komise hned v pátek předloží členským státům návrh společné pozice vůči ČR v kapitole energetika s doporučením ji uzavřít. Rakouská strana se zavázala, že tomu nebude bránit.
  20. ^ "CEZ Group | Temelín". Cez.cz. Archived from the original on 24 January 2012. Retrieved 4 December 2011.
  21. ^ "PRIS – Czech Republic". IAEA. Archived from the original on 9 May 2015. Retrieved 15 September 2014.
  22. ^ Bica, Martin (November 2013). "Temelín Power Update" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 May 2018.
  23. ^ "Temelín reaguje na horko připojením čtyř chladicích věží k prvnímu bloku". OEnergetice.cz (in Czech). 21 July 2016. Archived from the original on 9 May 2018. Retrieved 8 May 2018.
  24. ^ a b "Czech Republic: Nuclear Power Reactors – Alphabetic". IAEA. Archived from the original on 4 June 2011. Retrieved 4 December 2011.
  25. ^ "Temelín 2 clear for longer operation: Regulation & Safety – World Nuclear News".
  26. ^ PRIS.Contact-Point@iaea.org. "Temelin Reactor 1 at PRIS". Iaea.org. Retrieved 4 December 2011.[permanent dead link]
  27. ^ PRIS.Contact-Point@iaea.org. "Temelin Reactor 2 at PRIS". Iaea.org. Retrieved 4 December 2011.[permanent dead link]
  28. ^ Rostov Reactor 1[permanent dead link], Iaea.org
  29. ^ Kalinin Reactor 3[permanent dead link], Iaea.org
  30. ^ "Temelín vyrobil v roce 2012 rekordní množství elektřiny". Archived from the original on 21 January 2013. Retrieved 12 January 2013.
  31. ^ "CEZ requests EIA for expansion of Temelin". World Nuclear News. 14 July 2008. Archived from the original on 5 January 2009. Retrieved 9 August 2008.
  32. ^ "Tender launched for Temelin expansion". World Nuclear News. 3 August 2009. Archived from the original on 1 November 2009. Retrieved 3 August 2009.
  33. ^ jw (17 March 2011). "Temelín dostavíme, vzkázal po havárii Fukušimy premiér Nečas – iDNES.cz". Mladá fronta DNES. Archived from the original on 22 March 2011. Retrieved 4 December 2011.
  34. ^ "ČEZ delays Temelín completion deadline by 5 yrs to 2025". Prague Daily Monitor. 21 February 2011. Archived from the original on 26 March 2012. Retrieved 23 September 2011.
  35. ^ "CEZ Group | ČEZ Has Today Opened Bids from Three Qualified Bidders Interested in Completing the Temelín NPP and have Thus Started the Bid Evaluation Process". Cez.cz. Archived from the original on 2 November 2012. Retrieved 7 March 2014.
  36. ^ "CEZ Group | Areva Failed to Comply with Public Contract Requirements Defined for Building Temelín NPP Units 3 and 4; ČEZ Had to Disqualify This Bidder". Cez.cz. 17 January 2014. Archived from the original on 1 November 2012. Retrieved 7 March 2014.
  37. ^ "MIR-1200 Consortium Signs Temelín Contracts With Czech Companies". Nucnet.org. 2 July 2012. Archived from the original on 19 October 2013. Retrieved 7 March 2014.
  38. ^ "CEZ cancels Temelin 3&4 project". Nuclear Engineering International. 11 April 2014. Archived from the original on 16 April 2014. Retrieved 16 April 2014.
  39. ^ "Westinghouse to upgrade Temelin NPP's I&C systems". Nuclear Engineering International. 16 September 2021. Retrieved 22 September 2021.
[edit]