Talk:Geoffrey Giuliano

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Geoffrey Giuliano. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928044055/http://incolor.inebraska.com/sumaree/beatles/celebration.htm to http://incolor.inebraska.com/sumaree/beatles/celebration.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:35, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Allegation Giuliano is in hiding in Thailand

There's an line in the current version that says Giuliano is in hiding for doing dirty deeds to Yoko Ono and Pete Townshend. It isn't properly sourced, and the link it leads to is some stuff that has nothing to do with it, but that makes other, more horrendous allegations.

Here is the background. Giuliano did apparently once tell a reporter from a now-defunct Canadian alternative newspaper that he "stole a tape" from Pete Townshend. I had information about this entered in the article at one time, but it's been removed - probably because the overall tone of the article was so negative at that time. But, in all fairness, I've never seen any suggestion that Townshend is "pursuing" him, and that goes back a long way, when Townshend hired Giuliano to work on some kind of "street theater" project, probably early 70's. There have been other allegations, and there is one in the link, that he has amassed some of his Beatles collection by "borrowing," and not returning. But the statement that's in the article right now is not addressing that.

As to Yoko Ono - that's a little more solid, because he apparently represented himself as a "middleman" for sale of Wedding Photos. You can read about that in the entry I've added. Is Ono "pursuing" him? Maybe she should, because he says not-so-nice things about her whenever he gets a chance. But - there's no evidence that's surfaced in the press that she is. The only evidence she might be after him now is circumstantial. Giulano left for Thailand after she issued a subpoena about sources he'd used to write his book about Lennon - the one that was purportedly based on Lennon's stolen journals. Whether she would continue to look into this if he returned to the U.S. - that's another question. But how can she pursue him when he's living in Thailand?

Any thoughts on this, anyone? As I understand wiki, the statement I refer to should be removed. Maybe others should be reinstated - but that one should certainly be removed, correct? Oldsmobile (talk) 19:49, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

He's made a splash in Thailand

https://www.newsflare.com/video/148456/celebrity/us-actor-in-supermarket-rant-says-im-american-we-can-do-what-we-want

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Geoffrey Giuliano. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928094923/http://213.87.37.135/oea/millennium/news/00_may/28_buffalonews_1025088.htm to http://213.87.37.135/oea/millennium/news/00_may/28_buffalonews_1025088.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928094923/http://213.87.37.135/oea/millennium/news/00_may/28_buffalonews_1025088.htm to http://213.87.37.135/oea/millennium/news/00_may/28_buffalonews_1025088.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:05, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Incorrect Badman citations

There are two references that cite Badman 2000, which has no referent. Is the supporting source "Badman, Keith (2001). The Beatles Diary Volume 2: After the Break-Up 1970–2001." (cited elsewhere in the article) or "Badman, Keith (2000). The Beatles Off The Record." (found in other Beatles-related articles)? Reference purists want to know. David Brooks (talk) 23:46, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Fixed. User:JG66 determined the cites are from the 2001 source. David Brooks (talk) 03:54, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Lots of weird stuff

I actually found this page because GG takes Librivox recordings and repackages them as Audiobooks with his name on them and sells them. But more than that, I don't think it's responsible to claim he has anything to do with the McLibel case (even though he seemingly desperately wants to be known as being involved in it from his personal website). BoosterBronze (talk) 23:46, 14 December 2023 (UTC) But for real, should something on this page acknowledge that every article or news hit on this guy has him involved in some kind of shady-to-illegal kind of action? — Preceding unsigned comment added by BoosterBronze (talk • contribs) 23:50, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Sources

The closest thing to a real article about the man seems to be a secondary copy of a Buffalo newspaper basically calling Guilano a fraud. BoosterBronze (talk) 02:55, 11 November 2024 (UTC)