Talk:Beck v. Eiland-Hall: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 10:33, 11 November 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Beck v. Eiland-Hall article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

Beck v. Eiland-Hall has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 4, 2009	Articles for deletion	No consensus
January 27, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
January 29, 2013	Guild of Copy Editors	Copyedited
December 9, 2013	Peer review	Reviewed
May 20, 2014	Guild of Copy Editors	Copyedited
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 19, 2009. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in his response brief in Beck v. Eiland-Hall, attorney Marc Randazza* cited the U.S. Supreme Court case* Hustler Magazine v. Falwell?
Current status: Good article

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Freedom of speech Mid‑importance

	Freedom of speech portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Media Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on January 29, 2013.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Beck v. Eiland-Hall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:14, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{Talk header}}
-{{User:MiszaBot/config
+{{Article history
-|maxarchivesize = 250K
-|counter = 1
-|minthreadsleft = 1
-|algo = old(30d)
-|archive = Talk:Beck v. Eiland-Hall/Archive %(counter)d
-}}
-{{talkheader}}
-{{GA nominee|00:05, 25 November 2009 (UTC)|nominator='''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]])|page=1|subtopic=Law|status=|note=}}
-{{ArticleHistory
 |action1=AFD
 |action1date=4 October 2009
@@ Line 15: / Line 7: @@
 |action1oldid=317796214
+|action2=GAN
+|action2date=27 January 2010
+|action2link=Talk:Beck v. Eiland-Hall/GA1
+|action2result=listed
+|action2oldid=340235491
+| action3       = WPR
+| action3date   = 29 January 2013
+| action3result = copyedited
+| action3oldid  = 535586499
+|action4=PR
+|action4date=9 December 2013
+|action4link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Beck v. Eiland-Hall/archive1
+|action4result=reviewed
+|action4oldid=583199643
+| action5       = WPR
+| action5date   = 20 May 2014
+| action5result = copyedited
+| action5oldid  = 609341662
+|dykentry=... that in his response brief in '''''[[Beck v. Eiland-Hall]]''''', attorney '''[[Marc Randazza]]''' cited the [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] case ''[[Hustler Magazine v. Falwell]]''?
 |dykdate=19 October 2009
-|topic=socsci
+| currentstatus = GA
+| topic         = Law}}
+{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=other|collapsed=yes|class=GA|
+{{WikiProject Freedom of speech|importance=Mid}}
+{{WikiProject Law|importance=Low}}
+{{WikiProject Internet culture|importance=Low}}
+{{WikiProject Media|importance=Low}}
+{{WikiProject Comedy|importance=Low}}
+{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|user=Miniapolis|date=January 29, 2013}}
 }}
+{{User:MiszaBot/config
-{{blp}}
+|maxarchivesize = 250K
-{{WikiProjectBanners|1=
+|counter = 1
-{{WikiProject Law|class=C|importance=Low}}
+|minthreadsleft = 1
-{{WP Internet culture|class=C|importance=Low}}
+|algo = old(30d)
-{{WikiProject Media|class=C|importance=Low}}
+|archive = Talk:Beck v. Eiland-Hall/Archive %(counter)d
-{{Comedy|class=C|importance=Low}}
 }}
-{{notable Wikipedian|Isaac.Eiland-Hall|Eiland-Hall, Isaac}}
+== External links modified ==
-== Could shorter lead summarize the status?? ==
+Hello fellow Wikipedians,
+I have just modified {{plural:6|one external link|6 external links}} on [[Beck v. Eiland-Hall]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=746793850 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
+*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://www.statepress.com/node/9135
+*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131109051401/http://gawker.com/5355901/glenn-beck-pr-genius-spreads-the-false-rumor-he-raped-and-murdered-a-young-girl-in-1990 to http://gawker.com/5355901/glenn-beck-pr-genius-spreads-the-false-rumor-he-raped-and-murdered-a-young-girl-in-1990
+*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120224090707/http://bostonist.com/2009/09/30/satirical_glenn_beck_website_based.php to http://bostonist.com/2009/09/30/satirical_glenn_beck_website_based.php
+*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120224090724/http://bostonist.com/2009/10/01/today_in_randazzas_zings_glenn_beck.php to http://bostonist.com/2009/10/01/today_in_randazzas_zings_glenn_beck.php
+*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120224090800/http://bostonist.com/2009/10/21/randazza-glenn-beck.php to http://bostonist.com/2009/10/21/randazza-glenn-beck.php
+*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131109053242/http://www.hispanicbusiness.com/news/newsbyid.asp?idx=166251&cat1=newswire to http://www.hispanicbusiness.com/news/newsbyid.asp?idx=166251&cat1=newswire
+*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091111184454/http://gawker.com/5400754/glenn-beck-meets-internet-loses to http://gawker.com/5400754/glenn-beck-meets-internet-loses
+When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).
-It was too long for me to figure it out and I gave up. Did notice the web site is down, but haven't the faintest idea why. Please work on this someone :-) [[User:Carolmooredc|CarolMooreDC]] ([[User talk:Carolmooredc|talk]]) 22:25, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
+{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}
-:The lead is too long - see [[WP:LEAD]]. [[User:Morphh|<span style="color:green">Morphh</span>]]  <sup>[[user talk:Morphh|<span style="color:chocolate">(talk)</span>]]</sup> <small><i>1:19, 12 November 2009 (UTC)</i></small>
-::Suggestions on what should go?[[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 01:20, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
+Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 16:14, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
-:::Summarize the article - go one section at a time.  Limit the lead to about three paragraphs (and not the size of the jumbo paragraphs currently there). [[User:Morphh|<span style="color:green">Morphh</span>]]  <sup>[[user talk:Morphh|<span style="color:chocolate">(talk)</span>]]</sup> <small><i>1:25, 12 November 2009 (UTC)</i></small>
-::::So you would rather complain than do it yourself :P (screwing with you). It looks like Cirt was going for making the lead worthy of standing on its own and summarizing each aspect of the article as is seen in all good articles. Some trimming is needed, though. I don't think I would cut anything form the first paragraph and would focus on the length of the third and fourth. Thoughts? [[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 03:05, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
-:::::Per [[WP:LEAD]], I have made the lede be able to function as a stand-alone summary of the article's contents. I am open to more specific suggestions, however. :) '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 06:52, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
-::::::'''Update:''' I trimmed the lede a bit, [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Beck_v._Eiland-Hall&diff=325395899&oldid=325315345]. :) Cheers, '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 07:05, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
-:::::::Trimmed a bit more, [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Beck_v._Eiland-Hall&action=historysubmit&diff=325397197&oldid=325395899]. :) '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 07:21, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
-{{outdent}}Per the original comment by {{user|Carolmooredc}} expressing confusion about the website's status, I made this a bit clearer in the lede. Cheers, '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 07:29, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
-:Still way too long.  Remove all the mildly important details.. this is a brief summary.  Also, the lead does not make it clear up front - Why is this important?  Why did this get so much attention?  I'd say that it's not about Glenn Beck but the unique aspect of Domain Name litigation.  The lead does not make this clear that this is a unique and historic case that makes it important and notable.  [[User:Morphh|<span style="color:green">Morphh</span>]]  <sup>[[user talk:Morphh|<span style="color:chocolate">(talk)</span>]]</sup> <small><i>13:44, 24 November 2009 (UTC)</i></small>
-::I added back a teensy bit but otherwise looks good. :) '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 15:51, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
-:::'''Update:''' Per above comment by {{user|Morphh}}, added some info to lede regarding unique and historic nature of case [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Beck_v._Eiland-Hall&diff=327683804&oldid=327682913]. Cheers, '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 16:11, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
-::::Looking much better! Thanks. :-) [[User:Morphh|<span style="color:green">Morphh</span>]]  <sup>[[user talk:Morphh|<span style="color:chocolate">(talk)</span>]]</sup> <small><i>23:55, 24 November 2009 (UTC)</i></small>
-:::::Thank you, and thanks for your help. :) '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 00:00, 25 November 2009 (UTC)