Jump to content

Talk:Beck v. Eiland-Hall: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Mattisse (talk | contribs)
transclude review
m top: blpo=yes + blp=no/null → blp=other
 
(34 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{Article history
|maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 1
|minthreadsleft = 1
|algo = old(30d)
|archive = Talk:Beck v. Eiland-Hall/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{talkheader}}
{{GA nominee|00:05, 25 November 2009 (UTC)|nominator='''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]])|page=1|subtopic=Law|status=|note=}}
{{ArticleHistory
|action1=AFD
|action1=AFD
|action1date=4 October 2009
|action1date=4 October 2009
Line 15: Line 7:
|action1oldid=317796214
|action1oldid=317796214


|action2=GAN
|action2date=27 January 2010
|action2link=Talk:Beck v. Eiland-Hall/GA1
|action2result=listed
|action2oldid=340235491

| action3 = WPR
| action3date = 29 January 2013
| action3result = copyedited
| action3oldid = 535586499

|action4=PR
|action4date=9 December 2013
|action4link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Beck v. Eiland-Hall/archive1
|action4result=reviewed
|action4oldid=583199643

| action5 = WPR
| action5date = 20 May 2014
| action5result = copyedited
| action5oldid = 609341662

|dykentry=... that in his response brief in '''''[[Beck v. Eiland-Hall]]''''', attorney '''[[Marc Randazza]]''' cited the [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] case ''[[Hustler Magazine v. Falwell]]''?
|dykdate=19 October 2009
|dykdate=19 October 2009

|topic=socsci
| currentstatus = GA
| topic = Law}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=other|collapsed=yes|class=GA|
{{WikiProject Freedom of speech|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Law|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Internet culture|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Media|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Comedy|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|user=Miniapolis|date=January 29, 2013}}
}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{blp}}
|maxarchivesize = 250K
{{WikiProjectBanners|1=
|counter = 1
{{WikiProject Law|class=C|importance=Low}}
|minthreadsleft = 1
{{WP Internet culture|class=C|importance=Low}}
|algo = old(30d)
{{WikiProject Media|class=C|importance=Low}}
|archive = Talk:Beck v. Eiland-Hall/Archive %(counter)d
{{Comedy|class=C|importance=Low}}
}}
}}
{{notable Wikipedian|Isaac.Eiland-Hall|Eiland-Hall, Isaac}}


== External links modified ==
== Could shorter lead summarize the status?? ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified {{plural:6|one external link|6 external links}} on [[Beck v. Eiland-Hall]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=746793850 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://www.statepress.com/node/9135
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131109051401/http://gawker.com/5355901/glenn-beck-pr-genius-spreads-the-false-rumor-he-raped-and-murdered-a-young-girl-in-1990 to http://gawker.com/5355901/glenn-beck-pr-genius-spreads-the-false-rumor-he-raped-and-murdered-a-young-girl-in-1990
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120224090707/http://bostonist.com/2009/09/30/satirical_glenn_beck_website_based.php to http://bostonist.com/2009/09/30/satirical_glenn_beck_website_based.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120224090724/http://bostonist.com/2009/10/01/today_in_randazzas_zings_glenn_beck.php to http://bostonist.com/2009/10/01/today_in_randazzas_zings_glenn_beck.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120224090800/http://bostonist.com/2009/10/21/randazza-glenn-beck.php to http://bostonist.com/2009/10/21/randazza-glenn-beck.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131109053242/http://www.hispanicbusiness.com/news/newsbyid.asp?idx=166251&cat1=newswire to http://www.hispanicbusiness.com/news/newsbyid.asp?idx=166251&cat1=newswire
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091111184454/http://gawker.com/5400754/glenn-beck-meets-internet-loses to http://gawker.com/5400754/glenn-beck-meets-internet-loses


When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).
It was too long for me to figure it out and I gave up. Did notice the web site is down, but haven't the faintest idea why. Please work on this someone :-) [[User:Carolmooredc|CarolMooreDC]] ([[User talk:Carolmooredc|talk]]) 22:25, 11 November 2009 (UTC)


{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}
:The lead is too long - see [[WP:LEAD]]. [[User:Morphh|<span style="color:green">Morphh</span>]] <sup>[[user talk:Morphh|<span style="color:chocolate">(talk)</span>]]</sup> <small><i>1:19, 12 November 2009 (UTC)</i></small>
::Suggestions on what should go?[[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 01:20, 12 November 2009 (UTC)


Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 16:14, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
:::Summarize the article - go one section at a time. Limit the lead to about three paragraphs (and not the size of the jumbo paragraphs currently there). [[User:Morphh|<span style="color:green">Morphh</span>]] <sup>[[user talk:Morphh|<span style="color:chocolate">(talk)</span>]]</sup> <small><i>1:25, 12 November 2009 (UTC)</i></small>
::::So you would rather complain than do it yourself :P (screwing with you). It looks like Cirt was going for making the lead worthy of standing on its own and summarizing each aspect of the article as is seen in all good articles. Some trimming is needed, though. I don't think I would cut anything form the first paragraph and would focus on the length of the third and fourth. Thoughts? [[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 03:05, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
:::::Per [[WP:LEAD]], I have made the lede be able to function as a stand-alone summary of the article's contents. I am open to more specific suggestions, however. :) '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 06:52, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
::::::'''Update:''' I trimmed the lede a bit, [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Beck_v._Eiland-Hall&diff=325395899&oldid=325315345]. :) Cheers, '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 07:05, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
:::::::Trimmed a bit more, [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Beck_v._Eiland-Hall&action=historysubmit&diff=325397197&oldid=325395899]. :) '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 07:21, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
{{outdent}}Per the original comment by {{user|Carolmooredc}} expressing confusion about the website's status, I made this a bit clearer in the lede. Cheers, '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 07:29, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
:Still way too long. Remove all the mildly important details.. this is a brief summary. Also, the lead does not make it clear up front - Why is this important? Why did this get so much attention? I'd say that it's not about Glenn Beck but the unique aspect of Domain Name litigation. The lead does not make this clear that this is a unique and historic case that makes it important and notable. [[User:Morphh|<span style="color:green">Morphh</span>]] <sup>[[user talk:Morphh|<span style="color:chocolate">(talk)</span>]]</sup> <small><i>13:44, 24 November 2009 (UTC)</i></small>
::I added back a teensy bit but otherwise looks good. :) '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 15:51, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
:::'''Update:''' Per above comment by {{user|Morphh}}, added some info to lede regarding unique and historic nature of case [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Beck_v._Eiland-Hall&diff=327683804&oldid=327682913]. Cheers, '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 16:11, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
::::Looking much better! Thanks. :-) [[User:Morphh|<span style="color:green">Morphh</span>]] <sup>[[user talk:Morphh|<span style="color:chocolate">(talk)</span>]]</sup> <small><i>23:55, 24 November 2009 (UTC)</i></small>
:::::Thank you, and thanks for your help. :) '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 00:00, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
{{Talk:Beck v. Eiland-Hall/GA1}}

Latest revision as of 10:33, 11 November 2024

Good articleBeck v. Eiland-Hall has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 4, 2009Articles for deletionNo consensus
January 27, 2010Good article nomineeListed
January 29, 2013Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
December 9, 2013Peer reviewReviewed
May 20, 2014Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 19, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in his response brief in Beck v. Eiland-Hall, attorney Marc Randazza cited the U.S. Supreme Court case Hustler Magazine v. Falwell?
Current status: Good article

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Beck v. Eiland-Hall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:14, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]