Jump to content

Talk:Beck v. Eiland-Hall: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Cirt (talk | contribs)
m top: blpo=yes + blp=no/null → blp=other
 
(25 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{Article history
|maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 1
|minthreadsleft = 1
|algo = old(30d)
|archive = Talk:Beck v. Eiland-Hall/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{talkheader}}
{{ArticleHistory
|action1=AFD
|action1=AFD
|action1date=4 October 2009
|action1date=4 October 2009
Line 20: Line 13:
|action2oldid=340235491
|action2oldid=340235491


| action3 = WPR
| action3date = 29 January 2013
| action3result = copyedited
| action3oldid = 535586499

|action4=PR
|action4date=9 December 2013
|action4link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Beck v. Eiland-Hall/archive1
|action4result=reviewed
|action4oldid=583199643

| action5 = WPR
| action5date = 20 May 2014
| action5result = copyedited
| action5oldid = 609341662

|dykentry=... that in his response brief in '''''[[Beck v. Eiland-Hall]]''''', attorney '''[[Marc Randazza]]''' cited the [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] case ''[[Hustler Magazine v. Falwell]]''?
|dykdate=19 October 2009
|dykdate=19 October 2009
|topic=socsci


| currentstatus = GA
| currentstatus = GA
| topic = Law}}
| topic = Law}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=other|collapsed=yes|class=GA|
{{blp}}
{{WikiProject Freedom of speech|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProjectBanners|1=
{{WikiProject Law|class=GA|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Law|importance=Low}}
{{WP Internet culture|class=GA|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Internet culture|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Media|class=GA|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Media|importance=Low}}
{{Comedy|class=GA|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Comedy|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|user=Miniapolis|date=January 29, 2013}}
}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 1
|minthreadsleft = 1
|algo = old(30d)
|archive = Talk:Beck v. Eiland-Hall/Archive %(counter)d
}}

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,


I have just modified {{plural:6|one external link|6 external links}} on [[Beck v. Eiland-Hall]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=746793850 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
== Unsourced change ==
*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://www.statepress.com/node/9135
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131109051401/http://gawker.com/5355901/glenn-beck-pr-genius-spreads-the-false-rumor-he-raped-and-murdered-a-young-girl-in-1990 to http://gawker.com/5355901/glenn-beck-pr-genius-spreads-the-false-rumor-he-raped-and-murdered-a-young-girl-in-1990
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120224090707/http://bostonist.com/2009/09/30/satirical_glenn_beck_website_based.php to http://bostonist.com/2009/09/30/satirical_glenn_beck_website_based.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120224090724/http://bostonist.com/2009/10/01/today_in_randazzas_zings_glenn_beck.php to http://bostonist.com/2009/10/01/today_in_randazzas_zings_glenn_beck.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120224090800/http://bostonist.com/2009/10/21/randazza-glenn-beck.php to http://bostonist.com/2009/10/21/randazza-glenn-beck.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131109053242/http://www.hispanicbusiness.com/news/newsbyid.asp?idx=166251&cat1=newswire to http://www.hispanicbusiness.com/news/newsbyid.asp?idx=166251&cat1=newswire
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091111184454/http://gawker.com/5400754/glenn-beck-meets-internet-loses to http://gawker.com/5400754/glenn-beck-meets-internet-loses


When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).
[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Beck_v._Eiland-Hall&diff=341557284&oldid=340431662] = this change by {{user|Roregan}} is not backed up by the cited source at the end of the sentence. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 21:50, 2 February 2010 (UTC)


{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}
== Anonymity ==


Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 16:14, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
Although not directly applicable to the case, the anonymity of Eiland-Hall is worthy of more than the cursory mention here. Eiland-Hall accidentally left an electronic trail in spite of his anonymous domain registration and efforts to disguise his identity (including his web hosting service and the unmentioned but notable unsigned-but-not-anonymous Wikipedia edit). Once discovered, Hall claimed he was only hosting the website for a client, and that he was not the creator. The article gives the impression that he was initially anonymous, then discovered through legal proceedings, while the real story is more complex. I would think that all this would be worthy of mention, but if there's a reason why it's unmentioned, I'd want to hear it before making changes. [[User:Calbaer|Calbaer]] ([[User talk:Calbaer|talk]]) 18:15, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
:We would need a [[WP:RS]] secondary source to support changes. -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 15:31, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 10:33, 11 November 2024

Good articleBeck v. Eiland-Hall has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 4, 2009Articles for deletionNo consensus
January 27, 2010Good article nomineeListed
January 29, 2013Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
December 9, 2013Peer reviewReviewed
May 20, 2014Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 19, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in his response brief in Beck v. Eiland-Hall, attorney Marc Randazza cited the U.S. Supreme Court case Hustler Magazine v. Falwell?
Current status: Good article

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Beck v. Eiland-Hall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:14, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]