Jump to content

Contaminated currency: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
 
(35 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Paper currency with cocaine or disease}}
[[Image:DEA_Operation_Reciprocity_-_money_seizure.png|right|thumb|250px|$5.6 million was found hidden in this ceiling compartment of a truck during a seizure.]]
[[File:Cocaine lines 2.jpg|thumb|Lines of [[cocaine]] prepared for snorting. Contaminated currency such as banknotes might serve as a [[fomite]].]]
Most [[banknotes]] have traces of [[cocaine]] on them; this has been confirmed by studies done in several countries.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.snopes.com/business/money/cocaine.asp|title=Drug Money |accessdate=2008-07-23 |publisher=Snopes}}
[[File:A heavily-stained 1 dollar bill, 29 March 2022.jpg|thumb|A $1 bill that has been stained as a result of [[Coffee|black coffee]] being spilled on it. Due to the absorbency of the materials that make up dollar bills, they can be stained and contaminated by substances in the environment.]]
</ref> In 1994, the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit|U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals]] determined that in Los Angeles, out of every four banknotes, on average more than three are tainted by cocaine or another illicit drug.<ref>{{cite news |first= Alan|last=Abrahamson |title=Prevalence of Drug-Tainted Money Voids Case Law: Court cites findings that more than 75% of currency in L.A. bears traces of cocaine or other illegal substances |url=https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/59564073.html?dids=59564073:59564073&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Nov+13%2C+1994&author=ALAN+ABRAHAMSON&pub=Los+Angeles+Times+(pre-1997+Fulltext)&edition=&startpage=1&desc=Prevalence+of+Drug-Tainted+Money+Voids+Case+Law%3A+Court+cites+findings+that+more+than+75%25+of+currency+in+L.A.+bears+traces+of+cocaine+or+other+illegal+substances. |work= Los Angeles Times|date= 13 November 1994|accessdate=2008-07-23 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first= Debbie M.|last=Price |title=Use of Drug-Sniffing Dogs Challenged;ACLU Backs Complaint by Men Whose Pocket Cash Was Seized |url=https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/72586089.html?dids=72586089:72586089&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=May+6%2C+1990&author=Debbie+M.+Price&pub=The+Washington+Post+(pre-1997+Fulltext)&edition=&startpage=d.01&desc=Use+of+Drug-Sniffing+Dogs+Challenged%3BACLU+Backs+Complaint+by+Men+Whose+Pocket+Cash+Was+Seized |work= The Washington Post|date=6 May 1990 |accessdate=2008-07-23 }}</ref>


Most [[banknotes]] have traces of [[cocaine]] on them; this has been confirmed by studies done in several countries.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.snopes.com/business/money/cocaine.asp|title=Drug Money |date=9 July 2002 |accessdate=2008-07-23 |publisher=Snopes}}
Additionally, paper money in other parts of the world show a similar drug contamination, and studies indicate that they might even serve as a [[Vector (epidemiology)|vector]] of disease, though researchers disagree over how easily diseases are transmitted this way.
</ref> In 1994, the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit|U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals]] cited findings that in Los Angeles, three out of four banknotes were tainted by cocaine or another illicit drug.<ref>{{cite news |first=Alan |last=Abrahamson |title=Prevalence of Drug-Tainted Money Voids Case Law: Court cites findings that more than 75% of currency in L.A. bears traces of cocaine or other illegal substances |url=https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/59564073.html?dids=59564073:59564073&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Nov+13%2C+1994&author=ALAN+ABRAHAMSON&pub=Los+Angeles+Times+(pre-1997+Fulltext)&edition=&startpage=1&desc=Prevalence+of+Drug-Tainted+Money+Voids+Case+Law%3A+Court+cites+findings+that+more+than+75%25+of+currency+in+L.A.+bears+traces+of+cocaine+or+other+illegal+substances. |work=Los Angeles Times |date=13 November 1994 |accessdate=2008-07-23 |archive-date=2011-06-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110604092358/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/59564073.html?dids=59564073:59564073&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Nov+13,+1994&author=ALAN+ABRAHAMSON&pub=Los+Angeles+Times+(pre-1997+Fulltext)&edition=&startpage=1&desc=Prevalence+of+Drug-Tainted+Money+Voids+Case+Law:+Court+cites+findings+that+more+than+75%+of+currency+in+L.A.+bears+traces+of+cocaine+or+other+illegal+substances. |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Debbie M. |last=Price |title=Use of Drug-Sniffing Dogs Challenged;ACLU Backs Complaint by Men Whose Pocket Cash Was Seized |url=https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/72586089.html?dids=72586089:72586089&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=May+6%2C+1990&author=Debbie+M.+Price&pub=The+Washington+Post+(pre-1997+Fulltext)&edition=&startpage=d.01&desc=Use+of+Drug-Sniffing+Dogs+Challenged%3BACLU+Backs+Complaint+by+Men+Whose+Pocket+Cash+Was+Seized |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110604092431/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/72586089.html?dids=72586089:72586089&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=May+6,+1990&author=Debbie+M.+Price&pub=The+Washington+Post+(pre-1997+Fulltext)&edition=&startpage=d.01&desc=Use+of+Drug-Sniffing+Dogs+Challenged%3BACLU+Backs+Complaint+by+Men+Whose+Pocket+Cash+Was+Seized |url-status=dead |archive-date=June 4, 2011 |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=6 May 1990 |accessdate=2008-07-23 }}</ref>


Studies indicate that banknotes may serve as a [[fomite]]—an inanimate object that can spread disease if contaminated—though researchers disagree over how easily diseases are transmitted by this mechanism.
[[Image:YeGon millions.jpg|right|thumb|Part of the US$207 million seized from alleged drug trafficker [[Zhenli Ye Gon]].]]

Several theories have been suggested to explain this contamination beyond the predictable contamination due to handling during drug deals and the use of rolled up notes for [[Insufflation (medicine)|snorting]] drugs. After the initial contamination, the substance is "infected to" other notes in close contact, often stacked together, in enclosed environments common in [[financial institution]]s.
Several theories have been suggested to explain this contamination beyond the predictable contamination due to handling during drug deals and the use of rolled up notes for [[Insufflation (medicine)|snorting]] drugs. After the initial contamination, the substance is transferred to other notes in close contact, often stacked together, in enclosed environments common in [[financial institution]]s.


==In the United States==
==In the United States==
[[File:80 1 dollar bills in a homemade banknote strap.jpg|thumb|A stack of 80 circulated [[United States one-dollar bill|$1 bill]]s, held together with a [[currency strap]] made from paper. Due to the way banknotes are stored, contaminants on contaminated currency may spread over time.]]
[[File:80 1 dollar bills in a homemade banknote strap.jpg|thumb|A stack of 80 circulated [[United States one-dollar bill|$1 bill]]s, held together with a [[currency strap]] made from paper. Due to the way banknotes are stored, contaminants on contaminated currency may spread over time.]]

[[File:A heavily-stained 1 dollar bill, 29 March 2022.jpg|thumb|A $1 bill that has been stained by a large amount of [[black coffee]]. Due to the absorbency of the material that makes up dollar bills, they can be stained and contaminated by substances in the environment.]]
In a study reported in ''[[Forensic Science International]]'', A.J. Jenkins, at the Office of the [[Cuyahoga County, Ohio|Cuyahoga County]] Coroner ([[Cleveland, Ohio|Cleveland, OH]]), the author reports the analysis of ten randomly collected [[United States one-dollar bill|one-dollar bills]] from five cities, and tested for [[cocaine]], [[heroin]], [[6-Monoacetylmorphine|6-acetylmorphine]] (also called "6-AM"), [[morphine]], [[codeine]], [[methamphetamine]], [[amphetamine]] and [[Phencyclidine|phencyclidine (PCP)]]. Bills were then immersed in [[acetonitrile]] for two hours prior to extraction and subjected to [[Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry]] (GC-MS) analysis. Results demonstrated that "92% of the bills were positive for cocaine with a mean amount of 28.75 ± 139.07 micrograms per bill, a [[median]] of 1.37 μg per bill, and a range of 0.01-922.72 μg per bill. Heroin was detected in seven bills in amounts ranging from 0.03 to 168.5 μg per bill: 6-AM and morphine were detected in three bills; methamphetamine and amphetamine in three and one bills, respectively, and PCP was detected in two bills in amounts of 0.78 and 1.87 μg per bill. Codeine was not detected in any of the one-dollar bills analyzed". The study confirmed that although paper currency was most often contaminated with cocaine, other drugs of abuse may also be detected in bills.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://cocaine.org/cokemoney/index.html |title=Drug contamination of US paper currency |accessdate=2008-07-26 |author=Jenkins AJ |date=1 October 2001 |journal=Forensic Science International |volume=121 |issue=3 |pages=189–93 |doi=10.1016/s0379-0738(01)00401-7 |pmid=11566423 }}</ref><ref name="Jenk">{{cite journal|last1=Jenkins|first1=Amanda J|title=Drug contamination of US paper currency|issue=3|pages=189–193|journal=Forensic Science International|volume=121|doi=10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00401-7|date=October 2001|pmid=11566423}}</ref>
In a study reported in ''[[Forensic Science International]]'', A.J. Jenkins, at the Office of the [[Cuyahoga County, Ohio|Cuyahoga County]] Coroner ([[Cleveland, Ohio|Cleveland, OH]]), the author reports the analysis of ten randomly collected [[United States one-dollar bill|one-dollar bills]] from five cities, and tested for [[cocaine]], [[heroin]], [[6-Monoacetylmorphine|6-acetylmorphine]] (also called "6-AM"), [[morphine]], [[codeine]], [[methamphetamine]], [[amphetamine]] and [[Phencyclidine|phencyclidine (PCP)]]. Bills were then immersed in [[acetonitrile]] for two hours prior to extraction and subjected to [[Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry]] (GC-MS) analysis. Results demonstrated that "92% of the bills were positive for cocaine with a mean amount of 28.75 ± 139.07 micrograms per bill, a [[median]] of 1.37 μg per bill, and a range of 0.01-922.72 μg per bill. Heroin was detected in seven bills in amounts ranging from 0.03 to 168.5 μg per bill: 6-AM and morphine were detected in three bills; methamphetamine and amphetamine in three and one bills, respectively, and PCP was detected in two bills in amounts of 0.78 and 1.87 μg per bill. Codeine was not detected in any of the one-dollar bills analyzed". The study confirmed that although paper currency was most often contaminated with cocaine, other drugs of abuse may also be detected in bills.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://cocaine.org/cokemoney/index.html |title=Drug contamination of US paper currency |accessdate=2008-07-26 |author=Jenkins AJ |date=1 October 2001 |journal=Forensic Science International |volume=121 |issue=3 |pages=189–93 |doi=10.1016/s0379-0738(01)00401-7 |pmid=11566423 }}</ref><ref name="Jenk">{{cite journal|last1=Jenkins|first1=Amanda J|title=Drug contamination of US paper currency|issue=3|pages=189–193|journal=Forensic Science International|volume=121|doi=10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00401-7|date=October 2001|pmid=11566423}}</ref>


Line 17: Line 19:
This was confirmed by [[Ronald K. Siegel]] in his book, ''Intoxication: Life in Pursuit of Artificial Paradise'',<ref>{{cite book |last=Siegal |first=Ronald |author-link=Ronald K. Siegel |title=Intoxication: life in pursuit of artificial paradise |date=1989 |publisher=BD Dutton |isbn=978-0-525-24764-7 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/intoxicationlife0000sieg }}</ref> who noted the figure as well. Another study by the ''[[Journal of Analytical Toxicology]]'' is more conservative, noting a still substantial contamination of 80% of US currency by cocaine.<ref name="Oyl">{{Cite journal|last1=Oyler|display-authors=etal|first1=Jonathan|title=Cocaine Contamination of United States Paper Currency|journal=Journal of Analytical Toxicology|volume=20|issue=4|pages=213–216|doi=10.1093/jat/20.4.213|pmid=8835657|year=1996|doi-access=free}}</ref>
This was confirmed by [[Ronald K. Siegel]] in his book, ''Intoxication: Life in Pursuit of Artificial Paradise'',<ref>{{cite book |last=Siegal |first=Ronald |author-link=Ronald K. Siegel |title=Intoxication: life in pursuit of artificial paradise |date=1989 |publisher=BD Dutton |isbn=978-0-525-24764-7 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/intoxicationlife0000sieg }}</ref> who noted the figure as well. Another study by the ''[[Journal of Analytical Toxicology]]'' is more conservative, noting a still substantial contamination of 80% of US currency by cocaine.<ref name="Oyl">{{Cite journal|last1=Oyler|display-authors=etal|first1=Jonathan|title=Cocaine Contamination of United States Paper Currency|journal=Journal of Analytical Toxicology|volume=20|issue=4|pages=213–216|doi=10.1093/jat/20.4.213|pmid=8835657|year=1996|doi-access=free}}</ref>


It was uncovered in the ''[[Sacramento Bee]]'' that while the initial source of the [[contamination]] comes from money used in the [[Illegal drug trade]] in [[List of circulating currencies|circulation]], the U.S. [[Federal Reserve]] unwittingly spreads the substance to clean currency by mixing the notes together.<ref>{{cite news |first= Michael|last=Wagner |title=Why There's Cocaine on Your Money |url=http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=SB&p_theme=sb&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&s_dispstring=(cocaine%20on%20your%20money)%20AND%20date(1994)&p_field_date-0=YMD_date&p_params_date-0=date:B,E&p_text_date-0=1994&p_field_advanced-0=&p_text_advanced-0=(cocaine%20on%20your%20money)&p_perpage=10&p_sort=_rank_:D&xcal''_ranksort=4&xcal_useweights=yes |publisher=Sacramento Bee |date=16 November 1994 |accessdate=2008-07-23 }}</ref> The ''Journal of Analytical Toxicology'' confirms this assessment, noting that counting machines (in addition to simple proximity) are the agents of transfer.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Cocaine Contamination of United States Paper Currency |author=Jonathan Oyler |author2=William D. Darwin |author3=Edward J. Cone |name-list-style=amp |date=July–August 1996 | volume = 20|issue=4 |journal=Journal of Analytical Toxicology |pages=213–216 |doi= 10.1093/jat/20.4.213|pmid=8835657 |doi-access=free }}</ref>
According to the ''Journal of Analytical Toxicology'', the initial source of the [[contamination]] likely comes from money used in the [[Illegal drug trade]] in [[List of circulating currencies|circulation]], and the U.S. [[Federal Reserve]] unwittingly spreading the substance to clean currency by mixing notes together via counting machines, in addition to simple proximity.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Cocaine Contamination of United States Paper Currency |author=Jonathan Oyler |author2=William D. Darwin |author3=Edward J. Cone |name-list-style=amp |date=July–August 1996 | volume = 20|issue=4 |journal=Journal of Analytical Toxicology |pages=213–216 |doi= 10.1093/jat/20.4.213|pmid=8835657 |doi-access=free }}</ref>


The discovery that cocaine is so prevalent in U.S. banknotes has a legal application that reactions by [[Detection dog|drug-sniffing dogs]] is not immediately cause for arrest of persons or confiscation of banknotes. (The drug content is too low for prosecution but not too low to trigger response to drug-sniffing dogs.),<ref name="Egelko">{{cite web |url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/01/25/MNGIMAVRML1.DTL|title=Supreme Court expands police search powers: Drug-sniffing dogs now have access to any car stopped |last=Egelko |first=Bob |date=25 January 2005 |publisher=San Francisco Chronicle (online: SFGate) }}</ref> though this has been contested legally in a number of [[U.S. state]]s<ref name="Egelko"/> as a standard of what constitutes 'unusual' levels of contamination remains to be achieved (''see below'').
The discovery that cocaine is so prevalent in U.S. banknotes has a legal application that reactions by [[Detection dog|drug-sniffing dogs]] is not immediately cause for arrest of persons or confiscation of banknotes. The drug content is generally too low for prosecution but high enough to trigger response to drug-sniffing dogs.<ref name="Egelko">{{cite web |url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/01/25/MNGIMAVRML1.DTL|title=Supreme Court expands police search powers: Drug-sniffing dogs now have access to any car stopped |last=Egelko |first=Bob |date=25 January 2005 |publisher=San Francisco Chronicle (online: SFGate) }}</ref> This has been contested legally in a number of [[U.S. state]]s<ref name="Egelko"/> as a standard of what constitutes 'unusual' levels of contamination remains to be achieved (''see below'').


In addition to traces of illicit drugs, a recent study of currency within [[New York City]] have shown that various contagious microbes from skin and oral commensals are also transferred onto paper bank notes, including ''[[Cutibacterium acnes]]'', ''[[Staphylococcus epidermidis]]'' and ''[[Micrococcus luteus]]''.<ref name="Plos">{{cite journal|last1=Maritz|display-authors=etal|first1=Julia M.|title=Filthy lucre: A metagenomic pilot study of microbes found on circulating currency in New York City|journal=PLOS ONE|volume=12|issue=4|pages=e0175527|doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0175527|pmid=28384336|pmc=5383295|year=2017|bibcode=2017PLoSO..1275527M|doi-access=free}}</ref> Other microbes detected not associated with humans included ''[[Lactococcus lactis]]'' and ''[[Streptococcus thermophilus]]'', microbes typically associated with dairy production and fermentation. The study went on to prove that viable microbes could be isolated and cultured from paper currency. An earlier study conducted in western Ohio obtained similar findings, in which "One-dollar bills were collected from the general community in western Ohio to survey for bacterial contamination. Pathogenic or potentially pathogenic organisms were isolated from 94% of the bills. These results suggest a high rate of bacterial contamination of one-dollar bills."<ref name="Pope">{{cite journal|last1=Pope|display-authors=etal|first1=TW|title=Bacterial contamination of paper currency.|journal=Southern Medical Journal|pmid=12597308|volume=95|issue=12|date=December 2002|pages=1408–10|doi=10.1097/00007611-200295120-00011|s2cid=8477487}}</ref>
In addition to traces of illicit drugs, a recent study of currency within [[New York City]] have shown that various bacterial species of the human [[skin flora|skin]] and [[Oral microbiology#Oral microflora|oral flora]] are also transferred onto paper bank notes, including ''[[Cutibacterium acnes]]'', ''[[Staphylococcus epidermidis]]'' and ''[[Micrococcus luteus]]''.<ref name="Plos">{{cite journal|last1=Maritz|display-authors=etal|first1=Julia M.|title=Filthy lucre: A metagenomic pilot study of microbes found on circulating currency in New York City|journal=PLOS ONE|volume=12|issue=4|pages=e0175527|doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0175527|pmid=28384336|pmc=5383295|year=2017|bibcode=2017PLoSO..1275527M|doi-access=free}}</ref> Other microbes were found that, while not commonly found as commensals among humans, are still associated with human activities. These included ''[[Lactococcus lactis]]'' and ''[[Streptococcus thermophilus]]'', two species of bacteria typically associated with dairy production and fermentation. The study went on to prove that viable microbes could be isolated and cultured from paper currency. An earlier study conducted in western Ohio obtained similar findings, in which "One-dollar bills were collected from the general community in western Ohio to survey for bacterial contamination. Pathogenic or potentially pathogenic organisms were isolated from 94% of the bills. These results suggest a high rate of bacterial contamination of one-dollar bills."<ref name="Pope">{{cite journal|last1=Pope|display-authors=etal|first1=TW|title=Bacterial contamination of paper currency.|journal=Southern Medical Journal|pmid=12597308|volume=95|issue=12|date=December 2002|pages=1408–10|doi=10.1097/00007611-200295120-00011|s2cid=8477487}}</ref>


==In the United Kingdom==
==In the United Kingdom==
Line 32: Line 34:
Money recovered from police raids on the drugs trade are often heavily contaminated. In one raid in 2002, £465,000 was found which had been stored in a room where heroin was being prepared, and was so heavily contaminated that officers were advised not to touch it without protective equipment.<ref name="15m"/>
Money recovered from police raids on the drugs trade are often heavily contaminated. In one raid in 2002, £465,000 was found which had been stored in a room where heroin was being prepared, and was so heavily contaminated that officers were advised not to touch it without protective equipment.<ref name="15m"/>


Prior studies<ref>{{Cite journal |title=Rapid screening of banknotes for the presence of controlled substances by thermal desorption atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation tandem mass spectrometry |author1=Richard Sleeman |author2=I. Fletcher A. Burton |author3=James F. Carter |author4=David J. Robertsb |date=4 November 1998 |journal=The Analyst |volume=124|issue=2|pages=103–108|doi=10.1039/A808573K}}</ref> found that the level of contamination - i.e., the concentration of the contaminants - was different between those notes suspected to be used in the drug trade and those of proximity transfer levels. Subsequent tests have confirmed this determination, and serve as the basis for court cases against drug dealers, since the basic level of drug contamination remains fairly constant throughout the UK, despite factors that might immediately be thought to affect levels, like rural or urban environments, rich or poor or areas with high or low crime rates.<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6993853.stm |title=Drug taint links cash to crime |accessdate=2008-07-26 |author=Rebecca Morelle |date=13 September 2007 |work=BBC News }}</ref>
Prior studies<ref>{{Cite journal |title=Rapid screening of banknotes for the presence of controlled substances by thermal desorption atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation tandem mass spectrometry |author1=Richard Sleeman |author2=I. Fletcher A. Burton |author3=James F. Carter |author4=David J. Robertsb |date=4 November 1998 |journal=The Analyst |volume=124|issue=2|pages=103–108|doi=10.1039/A808573K}}</ref> found that the level of contamination - i.e., the concentration of the contaminants - was different between those notes suspected to be used in the drug trade and those of proximity transfer levels. Subsequent tests have confirmed this determination, and serve as the basis for court cases against drug dealers, since the basic level of drug contamination remains fairly constant throughout the UK, despite factors that might immediately be thought to affect levels, like rural or urban environments, rich or poor or areas with high or low crime rates.<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6993853.stm |title=Drug taint links cash to crime |accessdate=2008-07-26 |author=Rebecca Morelle |author-link=Rebecca Morelle |date=13 September 2007 |work=BBC News }}</ref>


===Hepatitis-C contamination===
===Hepatitis-C contamination===
The contamination of paper money is not limited to simply that of cocaine and other illicit drugs. Health officials in the UK warn that a silent [[Hepatitis-C]] epidemic could be brewing. Drug users with hepatitis who share with others the rolled paper note (or straw) used to snort cocaine can facilitate the transfer of the disease to thousands. As drug users are frequently impaired, they can easily fail to notice small traces of blood on these rolled banknotes.<ref name="LV">{{cite web |url=http://cocaine.org/cokemoney/banknotes.html |title='Shared banknote' health warning to cocaine users |accessdate=2008-07-26 |author=Laureen Veevers |date=1 October 2006 |work=The Observer }}</ref> This is considered to be of particular concern, as eight out of ten [[Asymptomatic carrier|carriers are unaware of their status]] (as hepatitis can lie dormant for decades), and have little in the way of access to regular healthcare <!--meaning unclear-->.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://healthlink.mcw.edu/article/971122496.html |title=Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Cocaine Users: A Silent Epidemic |accessdate=2008-07-26 |date=9 October 2001 |work=Healthlink MCW |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080625035125/http://healthlink.mcw.edu/article/971122496.html |archive-date=25 June 2008 |url-status=dead }}</ref> This higher risk for contracting hepatitis-C has also been noted by the American [[National Institutes of Health]] (NIH).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://consensus.nih.gov/1997/1997HepatitisC105html.htm
The contamination of paper money is not limited to simply that of cocaine and other illicit drugs. Health officials in the UK warn that a silent [[Hepatitis-C]] epidemic could be brewing. Drug users with hepatitis who share with others the rolled paper note (or straw) used to snort cocaine can facilitate the transfer of the disease to thousands. As drug users are frequently impaired, they can easily fail to notice small traces of blood on these rolled banknotes.<ref name="LV">{{cite web |url=http://cocaine.org/cokemoney/banknotes.html |title='Shared banknote' health warning to cocaine users |accessdate=2008-07-26 |author=Laureen Veevers |date=1 October 2006 |work=The Observer }}</ref> This is considered to be of particular concern, as eight out of ten [[Asymptomatic carrier|carriers are unaware of their status]] (as hepatitis can lie dormant for decades), and have little in the way of access to regular healthcare <!--meaning unclear-->.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://healthlink.mcw.edu/article/971122496.html |title=Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Cocaine Users: A Silent Epidemic |accessdate=2008-07-26 |date=9 October 2001 |work=Healthlink MCW |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080625035125/http://healthlink.mcw.edu/article/971122496.html |archive-date=25 June 2008 |url-status=dead }}</ref> This higher risk for contracting hepatitis-C has also been noted by the American [[National Institutes of Health]] (NIH).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://consensus.nih.gov/1997/1997HepatitisC105html.htm |title=5. What Recommendations Can Be Made to Patients to Prevent Transmission of Hepatitis C? |accessdate=2008-07-26 |author=NIH |date=24–26 March 1997 |work=NIH |archive-date=2005-09-23 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050923085313/http://consensus.nih.gov/1997/1997HepatitisC105html.htm |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.webmd.com/hepatitis/risk-hepatitis-c |title=Who Is at Risk for Hepatitis C? |accessdate=2008-07-26 |publisher=WebMd}}</ref> Without treatment, hepatitis-C can lead to [[chronic liver disease]].
|title=5. What Recommendations Can Be Made to Patients to Prevent Transmission of Hepatitis C? |accessdate=2008-07-26 |author=NIH |date=24–26 March 1997 |work=NIH }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.webmd.com/hepatitis/risk-hepatitis-c |title=Who Is at Risk for Hepatitis C? |accessdate=2008-07-26 |publisher=WebMd}}</ref> Without treatment, hepatitis-C can lead to [[chronic liver disease]].


The British [[Department of Health (United Kingdom)|Department of Health]] estimates that there are over 200,000 people infected with hepatitis C in Britain, but the number might be much higher.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.hpa.org.uk/web/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1196942171852 |title='Hepatitis C in England: The Health Protection Agency Annual Report 2006 |accessdate=2008-07-26 |author=Andrea Mann |editor=Helen Harris |editor2=Mary Ramsay |date=December 2006 |work=Health Protection Agency Centre for Infections |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110102032129/http://www.hpa.org.uk/web/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1196942171852 |archive-date=2011-01-02 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
The British [[Department of Health (United Kingdom)|Department of Health]] estimates that there are over 200,000 people infected with hepatitis C in Britain, but the number might be much higher.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.hpa.org.uk/web/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1196942171852 |title='Hepatitis C in England: The Health Protection Agency Annual Report 2006 |accessdate=2008-07-26 |author=Andrea Mann |editor=Helen Harris |editor2=Mary Ramsay |date=December 2006 |work=Health Protection Agency Centre for Infections |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110102032129/http://www.hpa.org.uk/web/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1196942171852 |archive-date=2011-01-02 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
Line 49: Line 50:


==Elsewhere in the world==
==Elsewhere in the world==
The longevity of most modern currency has also given rise to various fallacies regarding the transmission of [[Biological agent|bacteriological agents]] with paper banknotes. In early 2003, [[China]] placed banknotes under quarantine amid fears that [[SARS]] could be spread by the notes. Notes were held for 24 hours—the presumed lifespan of the virus. No evidence indicates that banknotes were an infection vector in the 2002–2004 [[2002–2004 SARS outbreak|SARS outbreak]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.wiley-vch.de/books/sample/352750236X_c01.pdf |title= Money Magic |date= 2006-03-29 |accessdate= 2015-02-05 |publisher= [[Wiley-VCH]]}}</ref>
The longevity of most modern currency has also given rise to various fallacies regarding the transmission of [[Biological agent|bacteriological agents]] with paper banknotes. In early 2003, [[China]] placed banknotes under quarantine amid fears that [[SARS]] could be spread by the notes. Notes were held for 24 hours—the presumed lifespan of the virus. No evidence indicates that banknotes were an infection fomite in the 2002–2004 [[2002–2004 SARS outbreak|SARS outbreak]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.wiley-vch.de/books/sample/352750236X_c01.pdf |title= Money Magic |date= 2006-03-29 |accessdate= 2015-02-05 |publisher= [[Wiley-VCH]]}}</ref> Similar concerns were raised during the onset of the [[COVID-19 pandemic]] in 2020, though further research conducted by the [[Bank of England]] found that banknotes were once again an unlikely fomite for transmitting the virus compared to contact with other objects and airborne transmission.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2020-11-24 |title=Bank notes pose 'low risk' of spreading Covid-19 |url=http://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/nov/24/bank-notes-pose-low-risk-of-spreading-covid-19 |access-date=2022-03-29 |website=the Guardian |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=COVID-19: Infection risk from handling cash is low, Bank of England concludes |url=https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-infection-risk-from-handling-cash-is-low-bank-of-england-concludes-12141084 |access-date=2022-03-29 |website=Sky News |language=en}}</ref>

Contamination of bills is one factor that influenced [[Australia]] to introduce [[Polymer banknote|polymer banknotes]] for general circulation in 1992. Australia now also prints polymer currency for almost two dozen other countries, including [[Israel]], [[Malaysia]], [[Mexico]] and [[Romania]].{{cn|date=February 2020}}


==See also==
==See also==
{{Portal|Money}}
{{Portal|Money}}
* [[United States dollar]]
* [[United States dollar]]
* [[Cocaine#United States|Cocaine in the United States]]
* [[Cocaine in the United States]]
* [[Mutilated currency]]


==References==
==References==

Latest revision as of 18:45, 11 November 2024

Lines of cocaine prepared for snorting. Contaminated currency such as banknotes might serve as a fomite.
A $1 bill that has been stained as a result of black coffee being spilled on it. Due to the absorbency of the materials that make up dollar bills, they can be stained and contaminated by substances in the environment.

Most banknotes have traces of cocaine on them; this has been confirmed by studies done in several countries.[1] In 1994, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals cited findings that in Los Angeles, three out of four banknotes were tainted by cocaine or another illicit drug.[2][3]

Studies indicate that banknotes may serve as a fomite—an inanimate object that can spread disease if contaminated—though researchers disagree over how easily diseases are transmitted by this mechanism.

Several theories have been suggested to explain this contamination beyond the predictable contamination due to handling during drug deals and the use of rolled up notes for snorting drugs. After the initial contamination, the substance is transferred to other notes in close contact, often stacked together, in enclosed environments common in financial institutions.

In the United States

[edit]
A stack of 80 circulated $1 bills, held together with a currency strap made from paper. Due to the way banknotes are stored, contaminants on contaminated currency may spread over time.

In a study reported in Forensic Science International, A.J. Jenkins, at the Office of the Cuyahoga County Coroner (Cleveland, OH), the author reports the analysis of ten randomly collected one-dollar bills from five cities, and tested for cocaine, heroin, 6-acetylmorphine (also called "6-AM"), morphine, codeine, methamphetamine, amphetamine and phencyclidine (PCP). Bills were then immersed in acetonitrile for two hours prior to extraction and subjected to Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis. Results demonstrated that "92% of the bills were positive for cocaine with a mean amount of 28.75 ± 139.07 micrograms per bill, a median of 1.37 μg per bill, and a range of 0.01-922.72 μg per bill. Heroin was detected in seven bills in amounts ranging from 0.03 to 168.5 μg per bill: 6-AM and morphine were detected in three bills; methamphetamine and amphetamine in three and one bills, respectively, and PCP was detected in two bills in amounts of 0.78 and 1.87 μg per bill. Codeine was not detected in any of the one-dollar bills analyzed". The study confirmed that although paper currency was most often contaminated with cocaine, other drugs of abuse may also be detected in bills.[4][5]

Another study, conducted at Argonne National Laboratory, found that four out of five dollar bills in Chicago suburbs contain traces of cocaine. Previous studies have found similar contamination rates in other cities. But the Argonne study is the first to demonstrate that if you handle contaminated bills, you won't wind up with drugs on your hands. "It's virtually impossible for cocaine to rub off", Argonne chemist Jack Demirgian said.[6] This estimate of contamination could be as high as 94%, according to Bill and Rich Sones of the Chicago Sun-Times.[7]

This was confirmed by Ronald K. Siegel in his book, Intoxication: Life in Pursuit of Artificial Paradise,[8] who noted the figure as well. Another study by the Journal of Analytical Toxicology is more conservative, noting a still substantial contamination of 80% of US currency by cocaine.[9]

According to the Journal of Analytical Toxicology, the initial source of the contamination likely comes from money used in the Illegal drug trade in circulation, and the U.S. Federal Reserve unwittingly spreading the substance to clean currency by mixing notes together via counting machines, in addition to simple proximity.[10]

The discovery that cocaine is so prevalent in U.S. banknotes has a legal application that reactions by drug-sniffing dogs is not immediately cause for arrest of persons or confiscation of banknotes. The drug content is generally too low for prosecution but high enough to trigger response to drug-sniffing dogs.[11] This has been contested legally in a number of U.S. states[11] as a standard of what constitutes 'unusual' levels of contamination remains to be achieved (see below).

In addition to traces of illicit drugs, a recent study of currency within New York City have shown that various bacterial species of the human skin and oral flora are also transferred onto paper bank notes, including Cutibacterium acnes, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Micrococcus luteus.[12] Other microbes were found that, while not commonly found as commensals among humans, are still associated with human activities. These included Lactococcus lactis and Streptococcus thermophilus, two species of bacteria typically associated with dairy production and fermentation. The study went on to prove that viable microbes could be isolated and cultured from paper currency. An earlier study conducted in western Ohio obtained similar findings, in which "One-dollar bills were collected from the general community in western Ohio to survey for bacterial contamination. Pathogenic or potentially pathogenic organisms were isolated from 94% of the bills. These results suggest a high rate of bacterial contamination of one-dollar bills."[13]

In the United Kingdom

[edit]

Forensic scientists have said that around 80% of all British banknotes contain traces of drugs.[14] A 1999 study found even higher levels of contamination in the London area; of 500 notes tested, only four had no traces of cocaine.[15] Most of the banknotes showed only low levels of contamination, suggesting they had merely been in contact with contaminated notes, but 4% of the notes in the study showed higher levels, which the researchers suggested was the result of either being handled by people under the influence of cocaine (which is excreted in skin oils), or by being used directly to snort the drug.[15]

There are drug levels above which banknotes need to be taken out of circulation, and over £15 million worth of notes are destroyed annually for this reason. The destruction is more often done as a precaution than because the money poses a serious health hazard.[14]

Cocaine is the drug most commonly found on banknotes. Heroin and ecstasy are found less often, though the frequency of ecstasy contamination rose in the years leading up to 2002.[14] Joe Reevy of Mass Spec Analytical, a company which analyses confiscated banknotes for the police, pointed out that heroin and ecstasy degrade more rapidly than cocaine, and that a single note which had been used to snort cocaine could subsequently contaminate many others when placed in a sorting machine, to explain the frequency of cocaine contamination.[14]

Money recovered from police raids on the drugs trade are often heavily contaminated. In one raid in 2002, £465,000 was found which had been stored in a room where heroin was being prepared, and was so heavily contaminated that officers were advised not to touch it without protective equipment.[14]

Prior studies[16] found that the level of contamination - i.e., the concentration of the contaminants - was different between those notes suspected to be used in the drug trade and those of proximity transfer levels. Subsequent tests have confirmed this determination, and serve as the basis for court cases against drug dealers, since the basic level of drug contamination remains fairly constant throughout the UK, despite factors that might immediately be thought to affect levels, like rural or urban environments, rich or poor or areas with high or low crime rates.[17]

Hepatitis-C contamination

[edit]

The contamination of paper money is not limited to simply that of cocaine and other illicit drugs. Health officials in the UK warn that a silent Hepatitis-C epidemic could be brewing. Drug users with hepatitis who share with others the rolled paper note (or straw) used to snort cocaine can facilitate the transfer of the disease to thousands. As drug users are frequently impaired, they can easily fail to notice small traces of blood on these rolled banknotes.[18] This is considered to be of particular concern, as eight out of ten carriers are unaware of their status (as hepatitis can lie dormant for decades), and have little in the way of access to regular healthcare .[19] This higher risk for contracting hepatitis-C has also been noted by the American National Institutes of Health (NIH).[20][21] Without treatment, hepatitis-C can lead to chronic liver disease.

The British Department of Health estimates that there are over 200,000 people infected with hepatitis C in Britain, but the number might be much higher.[22] Charles Gore, the chief executive of the Hepatitis C Trust, said: "Estimates show that around 5,000 new cases of hepatitis C are diagnosed every year - but they are mainly through chance. Because so many are undiagnosed we can't tell what kind of problem we are looking at. When 5,000 banknotes were tested in London in 2000, 99% of them had traces of cocaine on them. That tells us that there is potentially a massive problem in diagnosis and people's awareness of how easily hepatitis C can be contracted."[18]

Professor Graham Foster, of St Mary's Hospital, London, said: "Sharing banknotes or straws is a significant risk factor that people need to be more aware of. Although the risk of contracting hepatitis C through snorting is lower than through sharing a needle, it is still there."[18]

Europe

[edit]

Similar contaminations have been found on euro banknotes from Ireland,[23] Spain,[24] and Germany with the cocaine concentration being almost 100 times higher on the Spanish banknotes than on the German.[25] Additionally, Germany had noted the unusual occurrences of German euros cracking and disintegrating after being withdrawn from ATMs,[26] later explained as being caused by the sulfates used in the production of methamphetamine mixing with human sweat to form sulfuric acid, which breaks down the paper the euros are printed on. Most of the crystal methamphetamine present in Germany comes from Eastern Europe, and has a high level of sulfates.[27]

Elsewhere in the world

[edit]

The longevity of most modern currency has also given rise to various fallacies regarding the transmission of bacteriological agents with paper banknotes. In early 2003, China placed banknotes under quarantine amid fears that SARS could be spread by the notes. Notes were held for 24 hours—the presumed lifespan of the virus. No evidence indicates that banknotes were an infection fomite in the 2002–2004 SARS outbreak.[28] Similar concerns were raised during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, though further research conducted by the Bank of England found that banknotes were once again an unlikely fomite for transmitting the virus compared to contact with other objects and airborne transmission.[29][30]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Drug Money". Snopes. 9 July 2002. Retrieved 2008-07-23.
  2. ^ Abrahamson, Alan (13 November 1994). "Prevalence of Drug-Tainted Money Voids Case Law: Court cites findings that more than 75% of currency in L.A. bears traces of cocaine or other illegal substances". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 2011-06-04. Retrieved 2008-07-23.
  3. ^ Price, Debbie M. (6 May 1990). "Use of Drug-Sniffing Dogs Challenged;ACLU Backs Complaint by Men Whose Pocket Cash Was Seized". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on June 4, 2011. Retrieved 2008-07-23.
  4. ^ Jenkins AJ (1 October 2001). "Drug contamination of US paper currency". Forensic Science International. 121 (3): 189–93. doi:10.1016/s0379-0738(01)00401-7. PMID 11566423. Retrieved 2008-07-26.
  5. ^ Jenkins, Amanda J (October 2001). "Drug contamination of US paper currency". Forensic Science International. 121 (3): 189–193. doi:10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00401-7. PMID 11566423.
  6. ^ Ritter, Jim (26 March 1997). "4 out of 5 dollar bills show traces of cocaine". Chicago Sun-Times. Retrieved 2008-07-23.
  7. ^ Sones, Bill; Rich Sones (19 October 1997). "Most U.S. bills contaminated with traces of cocaine". Chicago Sun-Times. Retrieved 2008-07-23.
  8. ^ Siegal, Ronald (1989). Intoxication: life in pursuit of artificial paradise. BD Dutton. ISBN 978-0-525-24764-7.
  9. ^ Oyler, Jonathan; et al. (1996). "Cocaine Contamination of United States Paper Currency". Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 20 (4): 213–216. doi:10.1093/jat/20.4.213. PMID 8835657.
  10. ^ Jonathan Oyler; William D. Darwin & Edward J. Cone (July–August 1996). "Cocaine Contamination of United States Paper Currency". Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 20 (4): 213–216. doi:10.1093/jat/20.4.213. PMID 8835657.
  11. ^ a b Egelko, Bob (25 January 2005). "Supreme Court expands police search powers: Drug-sniffing dogs now have access to any car stopped". San Francisco Chronicle (online: SFGate).
  12. ^ Maritz, Julia M.; et al. (2017). "Filthy lucre: A metagenomic pilot study of microbes found on circulating currency in New York City". PLOS ONE. 12 (4): e0175527. Bibcode:2017PLoSO..1275527M. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175527. PMC 5383295. PMID 28384336.
  13. ^ Pope, TW; et al. (December 2002). "Bacterial contamination of paper currency". Southern Medical Journal. 95 (12): 1408–10. doi:10.1097/00007611-200295120-00011. PMID 12597308. S2CID 8477487.
  14. ^ a b c d e Tony Thompson (10 November 2002). "£15m of notes tainted by drugs are destroyed". The Observer. Retrieved 2008-07-27.
  15. ^ a b "UK Banknotes tainted with cocaine". BBC News. 4 October 1999. Retrieved 2008-07-26.
  16. ^ Richard Sleeman; I. Fletcher A. Burton; James F. Carter; David J. Robertsb (4 November 1998). "Rapid screening of banknotes for the presence of controlled substances by thermal desorption atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation tandem mass spectrometry". The Analyst. 124 (2): 103–108. doi:10.1039/A808573K.
  17. ^ Rebecca Morelle (13 September 2007). "Drug taint links cash to crime". BBC News. Retrieved 2008-07-26.
  18. ^ a b c Laureen Veevers (1 October 2006). "'Shared banknote' health warning to cocaine users". The Observer. Retrieved 2008-07-26.
  19. ^ "Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Cocaine Users: A Silent Epidemic". Healthlink MCW. 9 October 2001. Archived from the original on 25 June 2008. Retrieved 2008-07-26.
  20. ^ NIH (24–26 March 1997). "5. What Recommendations Can Be Made to Patients to Prevent Transmission of Hepatitis C?". NIH. Archived from the original on 2005-09-23. Retrieved 2008-07-26.
  21. ^ "Who Is at Risk for Hepatitis C?". WebMd. Retrieved 2008-07-26.
  22. ^ Andrea Mann (December 2006). Helen Harris; Mary Ramsay (eds.). "'Hepatitis C in England: The Health Protection Agency Annual Report 2006". Health Protection Agency Centre for Infections. Archived from the original on 2011-01-02. Retrieved 2008-07-26.
  23. ^ Rebecca Morelle (10 January 2007). "Cocaine contaminates Irish euros". BBC News. Retrieved 2008-07-26.
  24. ^ "Cocaine traces on Spanish euros". BBC News. 25 December 2007. Retrieved 2008-07-26.
  25. ^ "German euros full of cocaine". BBC News. 25 June 2003. Retrieved 2008-07-26.
  26. ^ "Brittle euro notes baffle Germans". BBC News. 2 November 2006. Retrieved 2008-07-26.
  27. ^ "Drug use 'behind crumbling euros". BBC News. 13 November 2006. Retrieved 2008-07-26.
  28. ^ "Money Magic" (PDF). Wiley-VCH. 2006-03-29. Retrieved 2015-02-05.
  29. ^ "Bank notes pose 'low risk' of spreading Covid-19". the Guardian. 2020-11-24. Retrieved 2022-03-29.
  30. ^ "COVID-19: Infection risk from handling cash is low, Bank of England concludes". Sky News. Retrieved 2022-03-29.