TCP/IP stack fingerprinting: Difference between revisions
ok Tags: Reverted nowiki added Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
m avoid unnec redirect |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[Image:passive figure.png|thumbnail|right|200px|Passive OS Fingerprinting method and diagram.]] |
[[Image:passive figure.png|thumbnail|right|200px|Passive OS Fingerprinting method and diagram.]] |
||
'''TCP/IP stack fingerprinting''' is the remote detection of the characteristics of a [[TCP/IP stack |
'''TCP/IP stack fingerprinting''' is the remote detection of the characteristics of a [[TCP/IP stack]] implementation. The combination of parameters may then be used to infer the remote machine's operating system (aka, '''OS fingerprinting'''), or incorporated into a [[device fingerprint]]. |
||
== TCP/IP Fingerprint Specifics == |
== TCP/IP Fingerprint Specifics == |
||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
* [[p0f]] – comprehensive passive TCP/IP stack fingerprinting. |
* [[p0f]] – comprehensive passive TCP/IP stack fingerprinting. |
||
* NetSleuth – free passive fingerprinting and analysis tool |
* NetSleuth – free passive fingerprinting and analysis tool |
||
* [[PacketFence]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.packetfence.org/ |title=PacketFence |publisher=PacketFence |date=2011-11-21 |accessdate=2011-11-25}}</ref> – open source [[Network |
* [[PacketFence]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.packetfence.org/ |title=PacketFence |publisher=PacketFence |date=2011-11-21 |accessdate=2011-11-25}}</ref> – open source [[Network access control|NAC]] with passive DHCP fingerprinting. |
||
* Satori – passive [[Cisco Discovery Protocol|CDP]], DHCP, ICMP, [[HP Switch Protocol|HPSP]], [[HTTP]], TCP/IP and other stack fingerprinting. |
* Satori – passive [[Cisco Discovery Protocol|CDP]], DHCP, ICMP, [[HP Switch Protocol|HPSP]], [[HTTP]], TCP/IP and other stack fingerprinting. |
||
* SinFP – single-port active/passive fingerprinting. |
* SinFP – single-port active/passive fingerprinting. |
||
Latest revision as of 14:59, 12 November 2024
TCP/IP stack fingerprinting is the remote detection of the characteristics of a TCP/IP stack implementation. The combination of parameters may then be used to infer the remote machine's operating system (aka, OS fingerprinting), or incorporated into a device fingerprint.
TCP/IP Fingerprint Specifics
[edit]Certain parameters within the TCP protocol definition are left up to the implementation. Different operating systems, and different versions of the same operating system, set different defaults for these values. By collecting and examining these values, one may differentiate among various operating systems and implementations of TCP/IP. The TCP/IP fields that may vary include the following:
- Initial packet size (16 bits)
- Initial TTL (8 bits)
- Window size (16 bits)
- Max segment size (16 bits)
- Window scaling value (8 bits)
- "don't fragment" flag (1 bit)
- "sackOK" flag (1 bit)
- "nop" flag (1 bit)
These values may be combined to form a 67-bit signature, or fingerprint, for the target machine.[1] Just inspecting the Initial TTL and window size fields is often enough to successfully identify an operating system, which eases the task of performing manual OS fingerprinting.[2]
Protection against and detecting fingerprinting
[edit]Protection against the fingerprint doorway to attack is achieved by limiting the type and amount of traffic a defensive system responds to. Examples include blocking address masks and timestamps from outgoing ICMP control-message traffic, and blocking ICMP echo replies. A security tool can alert to potential fingerprinting: it can match another machine as having a fingerprinter configuration by detecting its fingerprint.[3]
Disallowing TCP/IP fingerprinting provides protection from vulnerability scanners looking to target machines running a certain operating system. Fingerprinting facilitates attacks. Blocking those ICMP messages is only one of an array of defenses required for full protection against attacks.[4]
Targeting the ICMP datagram, an obfuscator running on top of IP in the internet layer acts as a "scrubbing tool" to confuse the TCP/IP fingerprinting data. These exist for Microsoft Windows,[5] Linux[6] and FreeBSD.[7]
Fingerprinting tools
[edit]A list of TCP/OS Fingerprinting Tools
- Zardaxt.py[8] – Passive open-source TCP/IP Fingerprinting Tool.
- Ettercap – passive TCP/IP stack fingerprinting.
- Nmap – comprehensive active stack fingerprinting.
- p0f – comprehensive passive TCP/IP stack fingerprinting.
- NetSleuth – free passive fingerprinting and analysis tool
- PacketFence[9] – open source NAC with passive DHCP fingerprinting.
- Satori – passive CDP, DHCP, ICMP, HPSP, HTTP, TCP/IP and other stack fingerprinting.
- SinFP – single-port active/passive fingerprinting.
- XProbe2 – active TCP/IP stack fingerprinting.
- queso - well-known tool from the late 1990s which is no longer being updated for modern operating systems
References
[edit]- ^ Chuvakin A. and Peikari, C: "Security Warrior.", page 229. O'Reilly Media Inc., 2004.
- ^ "Passive OS Fingerprinting, NETRESEC Network Security Blog". Netresec.com. 2011-11-05. Retrieved 2011-11-25.
- ^ "iplog". Retrieved 2011-11-25.
- ^ "OS detection not key to penetration". Seclists.org. Retrieved 2011-11-25.
- ^ "OSfuscate". Irongeek.com. 2008-09-30. Retrieved 2011-11-25.
- ^ Carl-Daniel Hailfinger, carldani@4100XCDT. "IPPersonality". Ippersonality.sourceforge.net. Retrieved 2011-11-25.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ "Defeating TCP/IP stack fingerprinting". Usenix.org. 2002-01-29. Retrieved 2011-11-25.
- ^ "Zardaxt.py". Github. 2021-11-25. Retrieved 2021-11-25.
- ^ "PacketFence". PacketFence. 2011-11-21. Retrieved 2011-11-25.