Jump to content

Grand Prince of Kiev: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 1203224157 by Dauzlee (talk) rv unconstructive edit
Reverted 2 edits by User386n (talk): Rv sock
 
(36 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{pp-semi-indef|small=yes}}
{{Short description|Title of the ruler of Kievan Rus' (10th–13th centuries)}}
{{Short description|Title of the ruler of Kievan Rus' (10th–13th centuries)}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2019}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2019}}
Line 21: Line 22:
}}
}}


The '''Grand Prince of Kiev''' (sometimes '''grand duke''') was the title of the monarch of [[Kievan Rus']], residing in Kiev (modern [[Kyiv]]) from the 10th to 13th centuries.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023|reason=Why not the 9th century?}} In the 13th century, Kiev became an [[appanage]] [[principality]] first of the [[grand prince of Vladimir]] and the [[Mongol Empire|Mongol]] [[Golden Horde]] governors, and later was taken over by the [[Grand Duchy of Lithuania]].{{Citation needed|date=February 2023|reason=RS needed.}}
The '''Grand Prince of Kiev''' (sometimes '''grand duke''') was the title of the monarch of [[Kievan Rus']], residing in Kiev<!-- Before changing Kiev to Kyiv, take a look at the "Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Ukrainian places)" page --> (modern [[Kyiv]]) from the 10th to 13th centuries.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023|reason=Why not the 9th century?}} In the 13th century, Kiev became an [[appanage]] [[principality]] first of the [[grand prince of Vladimir]] and the [[Mongol Empire|Mongol]] [[Golden Horde]] governors, and later was taken over by the [[Grand Duchy of Lithuania]].{{Citation needed|date=February 2023|reason=RS needed.}}


[[Rus' chronicle]]s such as the ''[[Primary Chronicle]]'' are inconsistent in applying the title "grand prince" to various princes in Kievan Rus'.{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=253}} Although most sources consistently attribute it to the prince of Kiev,{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=253}} there is no agreement which princes were also "grand prince", and scholars have thus come up with different lists of grand princes of Kiev.{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=253–254}}
[[Rus' chronicle]]s such as the ''[[Primary Chronicle]]'' are inconsistent in applying the title "grand prince" to various princes in Kievan Rus'.{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=253}} Although most sources consistently attribute it to the prince of Kiev,{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=253}} there is no agreement which princes were also "grand prince", and scholars have thus come up with different lists of grand princes of Kiev.{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=253–254}}
Line 27: Line 28:
== Background ==
== Background ==
=== Origins ===
=== Origins ===
[[File:Khlebnikov Codex regnal list start.jpg|thumb|[[Regnal list]] in the opening lines of the ''[[Khlebnikov Codex]]'': 'In Kiev, the first to begin reigning together were [[Askold and Dir|Dinar and Askold]], after them came [[Olga of Kiev|Olga]], after Olga [[Igor of Kiev|Igor]]...'{{sfn|Jusupović|2022|p=12}}]]
According to a founding myth in the ''[[Primary Chronicle]]'', [[Kyi, Shchek and Khoryv]] and their sister Lybid co-founded the city of Kiev ([[Kyiv]]), and the oldest brother [[Kyi]] was "chief of his kin" ({{lang-orv|кнѧжаше в родѣ|translit=knyazhashe v rodie}}).{{sfn|Cross|Sherbowitz-Wetzor|1930|p=54–55}} Some western historians (i.e., Kevin Alan Brook) suppose that Kiev was founded by [[Khazars]] or [[Magyars]]. Kiev is a Turkic place name (''Küi'' = riverbank + ''ev'' = settlement).<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.khazaria.com/khazar-history.html|title=An Introduction to the History of Khazaria|website=www.khazaria.com}}</ref><!---Irrelevant; we're talking about Kievan Rus', not the city of Kiev/Kyiv.---> At least during the 8th and 9th centuries Kiev functioned as an outpost of the Khazar empire (a hill-fortress, called ''Sambat'', "high place" in [[Old Turkic]]). According to [[Omeljan Pritsak]], [[Constantine Zuckerman]] and other scholars, Khazars lost Kiev at the beginning of the 10th century.<ref>Pritsak, Omeljan (1981). ''The origin of Rus''. Cambridge, Mass.: Distributed by Harvard University Press for the Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute.</ref><ref>Zuckerman, Constantine (2007). ''The Khazars and Byzantium – The First Encounter''. In ''The World of the Khazars: New Perspectives – Selected Papers from the Jerusalem 1999 International Khazar Colloquium'', eds. Peter Benjamin Golden, Haggai Ben-Shammai, and András Róna-Tas, pp. 399–432. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.</ref><!---Dubious relevance; we're talking about the title "Grand Prince of Kiev", not about when Kievan Rus' supposedly became independent of the Khazar Khaganate.--->
According to a founding myth in the ''[[Primary Chronicle]]'', [[Kyi, Shchek and Khoryv]] and their sister Lybid co-founded the city of Kiev ([[Kyiv]]), and the oldest brother [[Kyi]] was "chief of his kin" ({{langx|orv|кнѧжаше в родѣ|translit=knyazhashe v rodie}}).{{sfn|Cross|Sherbowitz-Wetzor|1930|p=54–55}} Some western historians (i.e., Kevin Alan Brook) suppose that Kiev was founded by [[Khazars]] or [[Magyars]]. Kiev is a Turkic place name (''Küi'' = riverbank + ''ev'' = settlement).<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.khazaria.com/khazar-history.html|title=An Introduction to the History of Khazaria|website=www.khazaria.com}}</ref><!---Irrelevant; we're talking about Kievan Rus', not the city of Kiev/Kyiv.---> At least during the 8th and 9th centuries Kiev functioned as an outpost of the Khazar empire (a hill-fortress, called ''Sambat'', "high place" in [[Old Turkic]]). According to [[Omeljan Pritsak]], [[Constantine Zuckerman]] and other scholars, Khazars lost Kiev at the beginning of the 10th century.<ref>Pritsak, Omeljan (1981). ''The origin of Rus''. Cambridge, Mass.: Distributed by Harvard University Press for the Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute.</ref><ref>Zuckerman, Constantine (2007). ''The Khazars and Byzantium – The First Encounter''. In ''The World of the Khazars: New Perspectives – Selected Papers from the Jerusalem 1999 International Khazar Colloquium'', eds. Peter Benjamin Golden, Haggai Ben-Shammai, and András Róna-Tas, pp. 399–432. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.</ref><!---Dubious relevance; we're talking about the title "Grand Prince of Kiev", not about when Kievan Rus' supposedly became independent of the Khazar Khaganate.--->


At some point, [[Rurik]], a [[Varangian]] prince, allegedly founded the "[[Rurik dynasty]]" (named after him in the 16th century) in 862 through the "[[calling of the Varangians]]", but he is considered to be a legendary, mythical and perhaps even entirely fictional character by modern scholars.{{efn|Christian Raffensperger (2012, 2017), Ostrowski (2018), Halperin (2022).{{sfn|Halperin|2022|p=viii}}{{sfn|Ostrowski|2018|p=47}}}} The ''Primary Chronicle'' never calls Rurik a prince of Kiev; the passage wherein Oleg "sat in Kiev" ({{lang-orv|понелѣже сѣде въ Кыевѣ|translit=ponelѣzhe sѣde v" Kyyevѣ}}) makes no mention of Rurik, suggesting the author was 'more interested in the first Rus' ruler to reside in Kiev than with any founder of a dynasty'.{{sfn|Ostrowski|2018|p=32}}
At some point, [[Rurik]], a [[Varangian]] prince, allegedly founded the "[[Rurik dynasty]]" (named after him in the 16th century) in 862 through the "[[calling of the Varangians]]", but he is considered to be a legendary, mythical and perhaps even entirely fictional character by modern scholars.{{efn|Christian Raffensperger (2012, 2017), Ostrowski (2018), Halperin (2022).{{sfn|Halperin|2022|p=viii}}{{sfn|Ostrowski|2018|p=47}}}} The ''Primary Chronicle'' never calls Rurik a prince of Kiev; the passage wherein Oleg "sat in Kiev" ({{langx|orv|понелѣже сѣде въ Кыевѣ|translit=ponelѣzhe sѣde v" Kyyevѣ}}) makes no mention of Rurik, suggesting the author was 'more interested in the first Rus' ruler to reside in Kiev than with any founder of a dynasty'.{{sfn|Ostrowski|2018|p=32}}


Kiev was captured by [[Askold and Dir]], whose existence is also debatable, and are called "[[boyar]]s" who "did not belong to [Rurik's] family" by the ''Primary Chronicle''.{{sfn|Cross|Sherbowitz-Wetzor|1930|p=60}}{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=259}} According to some Russian historians (i.e., Gleb S. [[Lebedev]]), Dir was a ''chacanus'' of Rhos ([[Rus' Khaganate|Rus khagan]]).<ref name=duczko>Duczko, Wladyslaw (2004). Viking Rus: Studies on the Presence of Scandinavians in Eastern Europe. Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. {{ISBN|90-04-13874-9}}</ref> [[Thomas S. Noonan|Thomas Noonan]] asserts that one of the Rus "sea-kings", the "[[High king]]", adopted the title khagan in the early 9th century.<ref>Noonan, Thomas (2001). ''The Khazar Qaghanate and Its Impact on the Early Rus' State: The translatio imperii from Itil to Kiev''. Nomads in the Sedentary World, Anatoly Mikhailovich Khazanov and Andre Wink, eds. p. 76-102. Richmond, England: Curzon. {{ISBN|0-7007-1370-0}}</ref> [[Peter Benjamin Golden]] maintained that the Rus became a part of the Khazar federation, and that their ruler was officially accepted as a vassal khagan of the Khazar Khagan of Itil.<ref>Golden, Peter Benjamin (1982). ''The Question of the Rus' Qaganate''. Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi. pp. 77–92</ref><!---Dubious relevance; we're talking about the title "Grand Prince of Kiev", not about the hypothesis that some early 9th-century monarchs residing in Kiev or possibly elsewhere held the title "khagan".--->
Kiev was captured by [[Askold and Dir]], whose existence is also debatable, and are called "[[boyar]]s" who "did not belong to [Rurik's] family" by the ''Primary Chronicle''.{{sfn|Cross|Sherbowitz-Wetzor|1930|p=60}}{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=259}} According to some Russian historians (i.e., Gleb S. [[Lebedev]]), Dir was a ''chacanus'' of Rhos ([[Rus' Khaganate|Rus khagan]]).<ref name=duczko>Duczko, Wladyslaw (2004). Viking Rus: Studies on the Presence of Scandinavians in Eastern Europe. Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. {{ISBN|90-04-13874-9}}</ref> [[Thomas S. Noonan|Thomas Noonan]] asserts that one of the Rus "sea-kings", the "[[High king]]", adopted the title khagan in the early 9th century.<ref>Noonan, Thomas (2001). ''The Khazar Qaghanate and Its Impact on the Early Rus' State: The translatio imperii from Itil to Kiev''. Nomads in the Sedentary World, Anatoly Mikhailovich Khazanov and Andre Wink, eds. p. 76-102. Richmond, England: Curzon. {{ISBN|0-7007-1370-0}}</ref> [[Peter Benjamin Golden]] maintained that the Rus became a part of the Khazar federation, and that their ruler was officially accepted as a vassal khagan of the Khazar Khagan of Itil.<ref>Golden, Peter Benjamin (1982). ''The Question of the Rus' Qaganate''. Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi. pp. 77–92</ref><!---Dubious relevance; we're talking about the title "Grand Prince of Kiev", not about the hypothesis that some early 9th-century monarchs residing in Kiev or possibly elsewhere held the title "khagan".--->

Before the mid-15th century, no historical source claims that Rurik founded a dynasty;{{sfn|Ostrowski|2018|p=30–31}} the [[Hypatian Codex]] of {{circa}} 1425 began its list of ''[[knyaz]]i'' of Kiev with "Dir and Askold", then "Oleg", then "Igor", up to 1240, and does not mention Rurik anywhere.{{sfn|Ostrowski|2018|p=36}} Similarly, the ''[[Khlebnikov Codex]]'' starts with a regnal list stating: 'In Kiev, the first to begin reigning together were Dinar and Askold, after them came Olga, after Olga Igor, after Igor Sviatoslav, (...)'.{{sfn|Jusupović|2022|p=12}} There is no mention of a "Rurik"; instead, the list starts with "Dinar and Askold".{{sfn|Jusupović|2022|p=12–13}} Unlike ''Hypatian''{{'}}s second place for Oleg the Wise,{{sfn|Ostrowski|2018|p=36}} however, ''Khlebnikov'' appears to assert [[Olga of Kiev]] succeeded them, and preceded her own husband [[Igor of Kiev]].{{sfn|Jusupović|2022|p=12}}


=== First princes ===
=== First princes ===
Askold and Dir are narrated to have been killed in 882 by [[Oleg of Novgorod|Oleg]], the first "prince" (''[[knyaz]]'') of Kiev according to the ''Primary Chronicle'', but not yet a "grand prince" (''velikiy knyaz'').{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=259}}{{sfn|Ostrowski|2018|p=32}} His relation to Rurik is debatable, and has been rejected by several modern scholars.{{sfn|Ostrowski|2018|p=30–31, 39}} Although later Muscovite chroniclers would call Oleg a "grand prince" and Kiev a "grand principality" ({{lang-orv|великое княжение|translit=velikoe knyazhenie}}), the earliest sources do not.{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=259–260}} Whereas the reconstructed original Greek text of the [[Rusʹ–Byzantine Treaty (907)]] calls Oleg a μεγας ἄρχων or "great [[archon]]" ("ruler"), the [[Old East Slavic]] translations found in the [[Laurentian Codex]] and [[Hypatian Codex]] do not.{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=260}} On the other hand, only when the Byzantine emperors [[Leo VI the Wise]], [[Alexander (Byzantine emperor)|Alexander]] and [[Constantine VII]] are called "the Great", Oleg is also called "the Great".{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=260}} Dimnik (2004) argued it should thus be read as "the Rus' prince Oleg the Great" instead of "Oleg the grand prince of Rus'".{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=260}} Similarly, the only occasions [[Igor of Kiev]] is ever called ''velikiy knyaz'' in the ''Primary Chronicle'' (six times) are all found in the [[Rusʹ–Byzantine Treaty (945)]], where the Greek emperors are also called ''k velikiy tsesarem Grech'-skim'' ("to the great Greek [[Caesar (title)|caesars]]").{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=260}} The same happens when, after [[Sviatoslav's invasion of Bulgaria]], the 971 peace treaty is recorded; it is the only place in the ''Primary Chronicle'' where [[Sviatoslav I]] is named a ''velikiy knyaz''.{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=260}} Most significantly, the ''Nachal'nyy svod'' (found only in the ''[[Novgorod First Chronicle]]'') never mentions any of these peace treaties, and never calls Oleg, Igor or Sviatoslav a ''velikiy knyaz''.{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=260–261}} According to Dimnik (2004), this means that Greek scribes added the word "great" to the princely title, whereas the Rus' themselves did not, except when translating these three treaties from Greek into Slavic.{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=260–261}}
Askold and Dir are narrated to have been killed in 882 by [[Oleg of Novgorod|Oleg]], the first "prince" (''[[knyaz]]'') of Kiev according to the ''Primary Chronicle'', but not yet a "grand prince" (''velikiy knyaz'').{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=259}}{{sfn|Ostrowski|2018|p=32}} His relation to Rurik is debatable, and has been rejected by several modern scholars.{{sfn|Ostrowski|2018|p=30–31, 39}} Although later Muscovite chroniclers would call Oleg a "grand prince" and Kiev a "grand principality" ({{langx|orv|великое княжение|translit=velikoe knyazhenie}}), the earliest sources do not.{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=259–260}} Whereas the reconstructed original Greek text of the [[Rusʹ–Byzantine Treaty (907)]] calls Oleg a μεγας ἄρχων or "great [[archon]]" ("ruler"), the [[Old East Slavic]] translations found in the [[Laurentian Codex]] and [[Hypatian Codex]] do not.{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=260}} On the other hand, only when the Byzantine emperors [[Leo VI the Wise]], [[Alexander (Byzantine emperor)|Alexander]] and [[Constantine VII]] are called "the Great", Oleg is also called "the Great".{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=260}} Dimnik (2004) argued it should thus be read as "the Rus' prince Oleg the Great" instead of "Oleg the grand prince of Rus'".{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=260}} Similarly, the only occasions [[Igor of Kiev]] is ever called ''velikiy knyaz'' in the ''Primary Chronicle'' (six times) are all found in the [[Rusʹ–Byzantine Treaty (945)]], where the Greek emperors are also called ''k velikiy tsesarem Grech'-skim'' ("to the great Greek [[Caesar (title)|caesars]]").{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=260}} The same happens when, after [[Sviatoslav's invasion of Bulgaria]], the 971 peace treaty is recorded; it is the only place in the ''Primary Chronicle'' where [[Sviatoslav I]] is named a ''velikiy knyaz''.{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=260}} Most significantly, the ''Nachal'nyy svod'' (found only in the ''[[Novgorod First Chronicle]]'') never mentions any of these peace treaties, and never calls Oleg, Igor or Sviatoslav a ''velikiy knyaz''.{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=260–261}} According to Dimnik (2004), this means that Greek scribes added the word "great" to the princely title, whereas the Rus' themselves did not, except when translating these three treaties from Greek into Slavic.{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=260–261}}


[[Yaropolk I of Kiev]] and [[Vladimir the Great|Volodimer I of Kiev]] are both steadily referred to as just a ''knyaz'' by the ''Novgorod First Chronicle'' and the Laurentian and Hypatian Codices.{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=261}} There is one exception: the Hypatian Codex writes ''Volodimir knyaz velikii'' ("Volodimir the grand prince") when reporting the latter's death; because the Hypatian Codex is the latest source of the three (compiled {{circa}} 1425), this is probably a later [[interpolation]].{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=261}} A ''Paterik'' of the [[Kyiv Pechersk Lavra]] of the early 13th century also calls Volodimer a ''velikiy knyaz'', but that was written two centuries after his death, and may not necessarily describe how he was known while alive.{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=262}} The oldest surviving source available is [[Hilarion of Kiev]]'s ''[[Sermon on Law and Grace]]'' ({{circa}} 1040s), which calls Volodimer a ''[[khagan|kagan]]'' (a [[Khazars|Khazar]] title) rather than a ''knyaz''.{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=262}} Some scholars have suggested that this indicates Kievan Rus' had won its independence from the Khazars in the early 10th century, and had inherited the title of ''kagan'' from them, before exchanging it for ''knyaz'' later.{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=262}} The [[Church Statute of Prince Vladimir|Church Statute of Prince Volodimir]] starts with "Behold, I, Prince Vasilii, called Volodimir," ({{lang-orv|Се аз, князь Василий, нарицаемыи Володимир|translit=Se yaz, knyaz' Vasilii, naritsayemy Volodimir,{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=262–263}}}}), but later in the text he interchangeably calls himself ''knyaz'' and ''velikiy knyaz'', and the earliest copy of this document is from the 14th century, so it is difficult to say what the lost original text said.{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=262–263}} Since chroniclers also regularly referred to Volodimer as ''velikiy'' without mentioning his title – the reason why he has become known to history as Volodimer "the Great" – suggests that this adjective was not part of his title, but a [[sobriquet]] or [[nickname]], that was also applied to other monarchs or clerics around him.{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=263–264}}
[[Yaropolk I of Kiev]] and [[Vladimir the Great|Volodimer I of Kiev]] are both steadily referred to as just a ''knyaz'' by the ''Novgorod First Chronicle'' and the Laurentian and Hypatian Codices.{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=261}} There is one exception: the Hypatian Codex writes ''Volodimir knyaz velikii'' ("Volodimir the grand prince") when reporting the latter's death; because the Hypatian Codex is the latest source of the three (compiled {{circa}} 1425), this is probably a later [[interpolation]].{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=261}} A ''Paterik'' of the [[Kyiv Pechersk Lavra]] of the early 13th century also calls Volodimer a ''velikiy knyaz'', but that was written two centuries after his death, and may not necessarily describe how he was known while alive.{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=262}} The oldest surviving source available is [[Hilarion of Kiev]]'s ''[[Sermon on Law and Grace]]'' ({{circa}} 1040s), which calls Volodimer a ''[[khagan|kagan]]'' (a [[Khazars|Khazar]] title) rather than a ''knyaz''.{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=262}} Some scholars have suggested that this indicates Kievan Rus' had won its independence from the Khazars in the early 10th century, and had inherited the title of ''kagan'' from them, before exchanging it for ''knyaz'' later.{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=262}} The [[Church Statute of Prince Vladimir|Church Statute of Prince Volodimir]] starts with "Behold, I, Prince Vasilii, called Volodimir," ({{langx|orv|Се аз, князь Василий, нарицаемыи Володимир|translit=Se yaz, knyaz' Vasilii, naritsayemy Volodimir,{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=262–263}}}}), but later in the text he interchangeably calls himself ''knyaz'' and ''velikiy knyaz'', and the earliest copy of this document is from the 14th century, so it is difficult to say what the lost original text said.{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=262–263}} Since chroniclers also regularly referred to Volodimer as ''velikiy'' without mentioning his title – the reason why he has become known to history as Volodimer "the Great" – suggests that this adjective was not part of his title, but a [[sobriquet]] or [[nickname]], that was also applied to other monarchs or clerics around him.{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=263–264}}


=== ''Velikiy knyaz'' Yaroslav and descendants ===
=== ''Velikiy knyaz'' Yaroslav and descendants ===
Line 100: Line 104:
==Grand princes of Kiev==
==Grand princes of Kiev==


{|class="wikitable"
{|class="wikitable sortable"
|-
|-
! Name
! Name
! House
! House
! Lifespan
! Lifespan
! Ruled From
! Ruled from
! Ruled Until
! Ruled until
! Notes
! Notes
|-
|-
Line 114: Line 118:
| 1019
| 1019
| 1054
| 1054
| son of Vladimir the Great, jointly with [[Mstislav of Chernigov|Mstislav]] in 1024–36. First widely attested ''velikiy knyaz'' ("grand prince") in virtually all contemporary sources.{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=264–265, 306}}
| son of Vladimir the Great, jointly with [[Mstislav of Chernigov|Mstislav]] in 1024–36.<br />First widely attested ''velikiy knyaz'' ("grand prince") in virtually all contemporary sources.{{sfn|Dimnik|2004|p=264–265, 306}}
|-
|-
| [[Iziaslav I of Kiev|Iziaslav I]]{{sfn|Martin|2004|p=32}}
| [[Iziaslav I of Kiev|Iziaslav I]]{{sfn|Martin|2004|p=32}}
Line 129: Line 133:
| 1076{{sfn|Martin|2004|p=32}}
| 1076{{sfn|Martin|2004|p=32}}
| son of Yaroslav
| son of Yaroslav
|-
|[[Vsevolod I of Kiev|Vsevolod I]]
|
Volodimerovichi{{sfn|Halperin|2022|p=viii}}
| 1030-1093
| 1076
| 1077
| son of Yaroslav, first time
|-
|-
| [[Iziaslav I of Kiev|Iziaslav I]]{{sfn|Martin|2004|p=32}}
| [[Iziaslav I of Kiev|Iziaslav I]]{{sfn|Martin|2004|p=32}}
| Volodimerovichi{{sfn|Halperin|2022|p=viii}}
| Volodimerovichi{{sfn|Halperin|2022|p=viii}}
| 1024–1078
| 1024–1078
| 1076{{sfn|Martin|2004|p=32}}
| 1077{{sfn|Martin|2004|p=32}}
| 1078
| 1078
| second time,{{sfn|Martin|2004|p=32}} in 1075 [[Pope Gregory VII]] sent him a crown from Rome
| second time,{{sfn|Martin|2004|p=32}} in 1075 [[Pope Gregory VII]] sent him a crown from Rome
Line 142: Line 154:
| 1078
| 1078
| 1093
| 1093
| second time
| son of Yaroslav
|-
|-
| [[Sviatopolk II of Kiev|Sviatopolk II]]
| [[Sviatopolk II of Kiev|Sviatopolk II]]
Line 172: Line 184:
| brother of Mstislav I
| brother of Mstislav I
|-
|-
| [[Viacheslav I of Kiev|Viacheslav I]]||Monomakhovychi||1083–1154||1139||1139|| brother of Yaropolk II (first time)
| [[Viacheslav I of Kiev|Viacheslav I]]
| Monomakhovychi
| 1083–1154
| 1139
| 1139
| brother of Yaropolk II (first time)
|-
|-
| [[Vsevolod II of Kiev|Vsevolod II]]{{sfn|Martin|2004|p=xvii}}
| [[Vsevolod II of Kiev|Vsevolod II]]{{sfn|Martin|2004|p=xvii}}
| Olgovichi
| Svyatoslavichi
| ?–1146
| ?–1146
| 1139{{sfn|Martin|2004|p=xvii}}
| 1139{{sfn|Martin|2004|p=xvii}}
| 1146
| 1146
| son of Oleh Svyatoslavich
| son of [[Oleg I of Chernigov|Oleh Svyatoslavich]]
|-
|-
| [[Igor II of Kiev|Igor II]]
| [[Igor II of Kiev|Igor II]]
| Olgovichi
| Svyatoslavichi
| ?–1147||1146||1146||brother of Vsevolod II
| ?–1147
| 1146
| 1146
| brother of Vsevolod II
|-
|-
|[[Iziaslav II of Kiev|Iziaslav II]]||Monomakhovychi||1097–1154||1146||1149||son of Mstislav I (first time)
| [[Iziaslav II of Kiev|Iziaslav II]]
| Iziaslavichi (Monomakh)
| 1097–1154
| 1146
| 1149
| son of Mstislav I (first time)
|-
|-
| [[Yuri Dolgorukiy]]||Monomakhovychi||1099–1157||1149||1151||(first time)
| [[Yuri Dolgorukiy]]
| Yurievichi (Monomakh)
| 1099–1157
| 1149
| 1151
| (first time)
|-
|-
| [[Viacheslav I of Kiev|Viacheslav I]]||Monomakhovychi||1083–1154||rowspan=2|1151||rowspan=2|1154||(second time) jointly
| [[Viacheslav I of Kiev|Viacheslav I]]
| Monomakhovychi
| 1083–1154
| rowspan=2|1151||rowspan=2|1154||(second time) jointly
|-
|-
| [[Iziaslav II of Kiev|Iziaslav II]]
| [[Iziaslav II of Kiev|Iziaslav II]]
| Iziaslavichi
| Monomakhovychi
| 1097–1154
| 1097–1154
| (second time) jointly
| (second time) jointly
|-
|-
|[[Rostislav I of Kiev|Rostislav I]]||Monomakhovychi||1110–1167||1154||1154||brother of Iziaslav II (first time)
| [[Rostislav I of Kiev|Rostislav I]]
| Rostislavichi (Monomakh)
| 1110–1167
| 1154
| 1154
| brother of Iziaslav II (first time)
|-
|-
|[[Iziaslav III of Kiev|Iziaslav III]]||Svyatoslavichi||?–1162||1154||1155||(first time)
| [[Iziaslav III of Kiev|Iziaslav III]]
| Olgovichi
| ?–1162
| 1154
| 1155
| (first time)
|-
|-
| [[Yuri Dolgorukiy|Yuri I Dolgorukiy]]{{sfn|Martin|2004|p=xvii}}
| [[Yuri Dolgorukiy|Yuri I Dolgorukiy]]{{sfn|Martin|2004|p=xvii}}
| Yurievichi
| Monomakhovychi
| 1099–1157
| 1099–1157
| 1155{{sfn|Martin|2004|p=xvii}}
| 1155{{sfn|Martin|2004|p=xvii}}
Line 207: Line 250:
| (second time)
| (second time)
|-
|-
|[[Iziaslav III of Kiev|Iziaslav III]]||Svyatoslavichi||?–1162||1157||1158||(second time)
| [[Iziaslav III of Kiev|Iziaslav III]]
| Olgovichi
| ?–1162
| 1157
| 1158
| (second time)
|-
|-
|[[Rostislav I of Kiev|Rostislav I]]{{sfn|Martin|2004|p=xvii}}
| [[Rostislav I of Kiev|Rostislav I]]{{sfn|Martin|2004|p=xvii}}
| Rostislavichi
| Monomakhovychi
| 1110–1167
| 1110–1167
| 1158{{sfn|Martin|2004|p=xvii}}
| 1158{{sfn|Martin|2004|p=xvii}}
Line 217: Line 265:
|-
|-
| [[Mstislav II of Kiev|Mstislav II]]
| [[Mstislav II of Kiev|Mstislav II]]
| Iziaslavichi (Monomakh)
| Iziaslavichi
| ?–1172
| ?–1172
| 1167
| 1167
Line 224: Line 272:
|-
|-
| [[Gleb of Kursk|Gleb]]{{sfn|Martin|2004|p=xvii}}
| [[Gleb of Kursk|Gleb]]{{sfn|Martin|2004|p=xvii}}
| Yurievichi (Monomakh)
| Yurievichi
| ?–1171
| ?–1171
| 1169{{sfn|Martin|2004|p=xvii}}
| 1169{{sfn|Martin|2004|p=xvii}}
Line 230: Line 278:
| son of Yuri Dolgorukiy (first time)
| son of Yuri Dolgorukiy (first time)
|-
|-
|[[Mstislav II of Kiev|Mstislav II]]||Iziaslavichi (Monomakh)||?–1172||1170||1170||(second time)
| [[Mstislav II of Kiev|Mstislav II]]
| Iziaslavichi
| ?–1172
| 1170
| 1170
| (second time)
|-
|-
|[[Gleb of Kursk|Gleb]]||Yurievichi (Monomakh)||?–1171||1170||1171||(second time)
| [[Gleb of Kursk|Gleb]]
| Yurievichi
| ?–1171
| 1170
| 1171
| (second time)
|-
|-
|[[Vladimir III Mstislavich]]||Monomakhovychi||1132–1171||1171||1171||son of Mstislav I the Great
| [[Vladimir III Mstislavich]]
| Monomakhovychi
| 1132–1171
| 1171
| 1171
| son of Mstislav I the Great. Reigned 5 February – 10 May 1171.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Літопис Руський. Роки 1169 — 1174. |trans-title=Rus' Chronicle. Years 1169–1174. |last=Makhnovets |first=Leonid |work=litopys.org.ua |date=1984 |access-date=4 June 2024 |url= http://litopys.org.ua/litop/lit19.htm |language=uk}}</ref>{{rp|306–307}}
|-
|-
|[[Mikhail of Vladimir|Michael I]]||Yurievichi (Monomakh)||?–1176||1171||1171||half-brother of Gleb
| [[Mikhail of Vladimir|Michael I]]
| Yurievichi
| ?–1176
| 1171
| 1171
| half-brother of Gleb
|-
|-
|[[Roman of Kiev|Roman I]]||Rostislavichi (Monomakh)||?–1180||1171||1173||son of Rostislav I (first time)
| [[Roman of Kiev|Roman I]]
| Rostislavichi
| ?–1180
| 1171
| 1173
| son of Rostislav I (first time)
|-
|-
|[[Vsevolod the Big Nest|Vsevolod III the Big Nest]]||Yurievichi (Monomakh)||1154–1212||1173||1173||brother of Michael I
| [[Vsevolod the Big Nest|Vsevolod III the Big Nest]]
| Yurievichi
| 1154–1212
| 1173
| 1173||brother of Michael I
|-
|-
|[[Rurik Rostislavich]]||Rostislavichi (Monomakh)||?–1215||1173||1173||brother of Roman I (first time)
| [[Rurik Rostislavich]]
| Rostislavichi
| ?–1215
| 1173
| 1173
| brother of Roman I (first time)
|-
|-
|[[Sviatoslav III of Kiev|Sviatoslav III]]||Olgovichi||?–1194||1174||1174||son of Vsevolod II (first time)
| [[Sviatoslav III of Kiev|Sviatoslav III]]
| Olgovichi
| ?–1194
| 1174
| 1174
| son of Vsevolod II (first time)
|-
|-
|[[Yaroslav II of Kiev|Yaroslav II]]||Iziaslavichi (Monomakh)||?–1180||1174||1175||son of Iziaslav II (first time)
| [[Yaroslav II of Kiev|Yaroslav II]]
| Iziaslavichi
| ?–1180
| 1174
| 1175
| son of Iziaslav II (first time)
|-
|-
|[[Roman of Kiev|Roman I]]||Rostislavichi (Monomakh)||?–1180||1175||1177||(second time)
| [[Roman of Kiev|Roman I]]
| Rostislavichi
| ?–1180
| 1175
| 1177
| (second time)
|-
|-
| [[Sviatoslav III of Kiev|Sviatoslav III]]{{sfn|Martin|2004|p=xvii}}
| [[Sviatoslav III of Kiev|Sviatoslav III]]{{sfn|Martin|2004|p=xvii}}
Line 257: Line 354:
| (second time)
| (second time)
|-
|-
|[[Yaroslav II of Kiev|Yaroslav II]]||Iziaslavichi (Monomakh)||?–1180||1180||1180||(second time)
| [[Yaroslav II of Kiev|Yaroslav II]]
| Iziaslavichi
| ?–1180
| 1180
| 1180
| (second time)
|-
|-
|[[Rurik Rostislavich]]||Rostislavichi (Monomakh)||?–1215||1180||1182||(second time)
| [[Rurik Rostislavich]]
| Rostislavichi
| ?–1215
| 1180
| 1182
| (second time)
|-
|-
|[[Sviatoslav III of Kiev|Sviatoslav III]]||Olgovichi||?–1194||1182||1194||(third time)
| [[Sviatoslav III of Kiev|Sviatoslav III]]
| Olgovichi
| ?–1194
| 1182
| 1194
| (third time)
|-
|-
|[[Rurik Rostislavich]]||Rostislavichi (Monomakh)||?–1215||1194||1202||(third time)
| [[Rurik Rostislavich]]
| Rostislavichi
| ?–1215
| 1194
| 1202
| (third time)
|-
|-
|[[Igor of Lutsk|Igor III]]||Iziaslavichi (Monomakh)||?–?||1202||1202||son of Yaroslav II (first time)
| [[Igor of Lutsk|Igor III]]
| Iziaslavichi
| ?–?
| 1202
| 1202
| son of Yaroslav II (first time)
|-
|-
|[[Rurik Rostislavich]]||Rostislavichi (Monomakh)||?–1215||rowspan=3|1203||rowspan=3|1206||jointly (fourth time)
| [[Rurik Rostislavich]]
| Rostislavichi
| ?–1215
| rowspan=3|1203
| rowspan=3|1206
| jointly (fourth time)
|-
|-
|[[Roman the Great|Roman II the Great]]||Iziaslavichi (Monomakh)||1160–1205||son of Mstislav II, jointly (1203–05)
| [[Roman the Great|Roman II the Great]]
| Romanovichi (Iziaslavichi)
| 1160–1205
| son of Mstislav II, jointly (1203–05)
|-
|-
|[[Rostislav II of Kiev|Rostislav II]]||Rostislavichi (Monomakh)||1173–1214||son of Rurik Rostislavich, jointly (1204–06)
| [[Rostislav II of Kiev|Rostislav II]]
| Rostislavichi
| 1173–1214
| son of Rurik Rostislavich, jointly (1204–06)
|-
|-
|[[Vsevolod IV of Kiev|Vsevolod IV the Red]]||Svyatoslavichi (Olgovichi)||?–1212||1206||1207||son of Sviatoslav III (first time)
| [[Vsevolod IV of Kiev|Vsevolod IV the Red]]
| Olgovichi
| ?–1212
| 1206
| 1207
| son of Sviatoslav III (first time)
|-
|-
|[[Rurik Rostislavich]]||Rostislavichi (Monomakh)||?–1215||1207||1210||(fifth time)
| [[Rurik Rostislavich]]
| Rostislavichi
| ?–1215
| 1207
| 1210
| (fifth time)
|-
|-
|[[Vsevolod IV of Kiev|Vsevolod IV the Red]]||Svyatoslavichi (Olgovichi)||?–1212||1210||1212||(second time)
| [[Vsevolod IV of Kiev|Vsevolod IV the Red]]
| Olgovichi
| ?–1212
| 1210
| 1212
| (second time)
|-
|-
|[[Igor of Lutsk|Igor III]]||Iziaslavichi (Monomakh)||?–?||1212||1214||(second time)
| [[Igor of Lutsk|Igor III]]
| Iziaslavichi
| ?–?
| 1212
| 1214
| (second time)
|-
|-
|[[Mstislav III of Kiev|Mstislav III]]||Rostislavichi (Monomakh)||?–1223||1214||1223||son of Roman I
| [[Mstislav III of Kiev|Mstislav III]]
| Rostislavichi
| ?–1223
| 1214
| 1223
| son of Roman I
|-
|-
| [[Vladimir IV of Kiev|Vladimir IV]]
|[[Vladimir IV Rurikovich]]||Rostislavichi (Monomakh)||1187–1239||1223||1235||brother of Rostislav II
| Rostislavichi
| 1187–1239
| 1223
| 1235
| brother of Rostislav II
|-
|-
|[[Iziaslav IV Vladimirovich]]||Siveria (Olgovichi) or<br>Rostislavichi (Monomakh)||1186–?||1235||1236||son of Vladimir Igorevich or Mstislav
| [[Iziaslav IV of Kiev|Iziaslav IV]]
| Olgovichi or<br>Rostislavichi
| 1186–?
| 1235
| 1236
| son of Vladimir Igorevich or Mstislav
|-
|-
|[[Yaroslav II of Vladimir|Yaroslav III]]||Yurievichi (Monomakh)||1191–1246||1236||1238||son of Vsevolod the Big Nest (first time)
| [[Yaroslav II of Vladimir|Yaroslav III]]
| Yurievichi
| 1191–1246
| 1236
| 1238
| son of Vsevolod the Big Nest (first time)
|-
| [[Michael of Chernigov|Michael II]]
| Olgovichi
| 1185–1246
| 1238
| 1239
| son of Vsevolod IV (first time)
|-
| [[Daniel of Galicia]]
| Romanovichi
| 1201–1264
| 1239
| 1240
| son of [[Roman the Great]]<br />appointed [[Voivode Dmytro]] as his governor, while residing in [[Halych]]
|-
|-
|[[Michael of Chernigov|Michael II]]||Svyatoslavichi (Olgovichi)||1185–1246||1238||1239||son of Vsevolod IV (first time)
|}
|}


=== Overview of princely branches of Kiev (1019–1169) ===
==Princes of Kiev after the Mongol invasion==
{{Princely branches of Kiev 1019 to 1169}}
Due to the Mongol invasion of 1240, Michael of Chernigov left Kiev to seek military assistance from King [[Béla IV of Hungary]]. During that time, Prince Rostislav of Smolensk occupied Kiev, but was captured the same year by [[Daniel of Galicia]] who placed his voivode Dmytro to guard Kiev while the grand prince was away. Being unsuccessful in Hungary, Michael visited [[Konrad I of Masovia]]. Receiving no results in Poland, he eventually asked Daniel of Galicia for asylum due to the Mongol invasion. Since the 14th century, the principality of Kiev started to fall under the influence of [[Grand Duchy of Lithuania]]. In 1299, the [[Metropolitan of Kiev|Metropolitan of]] Kiev [[Maximus, Metropolitan of all Rus|Maximus]] moved his metropolitan see from Kiev to [[Vladimir-on-Klyazma]]. In 1321, after the [[battle on the Irpin River]], [[Gediminas]] installed Mindgaugas, one of his subjects from the house of [[Olshanski]], a descendant of the family of [[Vseslav of Polotsk]] that was exiled to the [[Byzantine Empire]]. In 1331, Kiev was once again taken by a member of the Siverski house (Olgovichi branch), the prince of Putivl. After Grand Duke [[Algirdas]] defeated the Golden Horde at the [[Battle of Blue Waters]] in 1362, he incorporated Kiev and its surrounding areas into the [[Grand Duchy of Lithuania]].

== Princes of Kiev after the Mongol conquest of Kiev ==
Due to the [[Mongol invasion of Kievan Rus']] 1240, Michael of Chernigov left Kiev to seek military assistance from King [[Béla IV of Hungary]]. During that time, Prince Rostislav of Smolensk occupied Kiev, but was captured the same year by [[Daniel of Galicia]] who placed his voivode Dmytro to govern Kiev on his behalf while he resided in [[Halych]]. Being unsuccessful in Hungary, Michael visited [[Konrad I of Masovia]]. Receiving no results in Poland, he eventually asked Daniel of Galicia for asylum due to the Mongol invasion. Since the 14th century, the principality of Kiev started to fall under the influence of [[Grand Duchy of Lithuania]]. In 1299, the [[Metropolitan of Kiev|Metropolitan of]] Kiev [[Maximus, Metropolitan of all Rus|Maximus]] moved his metropolitan see from Kiev to [[Vladimir-on-Klyazma]]. In 1321, after the [[battle on the Irpin River]], [[Gediminas]] installed Mindgaugas, one of his subjects from the house of [[Olshanski]], a descendant of the family of [[Vseslav of Polotsk]] that was exiled to the [[Byzantine Empire]]. In 1331, Kiev was once again taken by a member of the Siverski house (Olgovichi branch), the prince of Putivl. After Grand Duke [[Algirdas]] defeated the Golden Horde at the [[Battle of Blue Waters]] in 1362, he incorporated Kiev and its surrounding areas into the [[Grand Duchy of Lithuania]].


{|class="wikitable"
{|class="wikitable"
Line 303: Line 492:
! Ruled until
! Ruled until
! Notes
! Notes
|-
|[[Rostislav Mikhailovich]]||Smolensk (Rostislavichi)||1210–1262||1239||1239||son of Michael II
|-
| [[Voivode Dmytro]] || || ||1239||1240||appointed by [[Daniel of Galicia]]
|-
|-
|[[Michael of Chernigov|Michael II]]||Svyatoslavichi (Olgovichi)||1185–1246||1241||1243||(second time)
|[[Michael of Chernigov|Michael II]]||Svyatoslavichi (Olgovichi)||1185–1246||1241||1243||(second time)
Line 424: Line 609:
*{{Cite journal |last1=Dimnik |first1=Martin |date=January 2004 |title=The Title "Grand Prince" in Kievan Rus' |url=https://doi.org/10.1484/J.MS.2.306512 |journal=Mediaeval Studies |publisher= |volume=66 |issue= |pages=253–312 |doi=10.1484/J.MS.2.306512 |access-date=27 February 2023}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Dimnik |first1=Martin |date=January 2004 |title=The Title "Grand Prince" in Kievan Rus' |url=https://doi.org/10.1484/J.MS.2.306512 |journal=Mediaeval Studies |publisher= |volume=66 |issue= |pages=253–312 |doi=10.1484/J.MS.2.306512 |access-date=27 February 2023}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Halperin |first1=Charles J. |date=2022 |title=The Rise and Demise of the Myth of the Rus' Land |url=https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/58585/9781802700565.pdf |location=Leeds |publisher=Arc Humanities Press |pages=107 |isbn=9781802700565 |access-date=5 March 2023}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Halperin |first1=Charles J. |date=2022 |title=The Rise and Demise of the Myth of the Rus' Land |url=https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/58585/9781802700565.pdf |location=Leeds |publisher=Arc Humanities Press |pages=107 |isbn=9781802700565 |access-date=5 March 2023}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Jusupović |first1=Adrian |date=2022 |title=The Chronicle of Halych-Volhynia and Historical Collections in Medieval Rus' |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JJxjEAAAQBAJ |location=Leiden |publisher=Brill |pages=268 |isbn=9789004509306}}
* {{cite book |title=Medieval Russia: 980–1584 |last=Martin |first=Janet |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sRCc3TtL9bIC |year=2004 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |isbn=9780521368322}} (digital printing 2004)
* {{cite book |title=Medieval Russia: 980–1584 |last=Martin |first=Janet |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sRCc3TtL9bIC |year=2004 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |isbn=9780521368322}} (digital printing 2004)
* {{Cite journal |last1=Ostrowski |first1=Donald |date=2018 |title=Was There a Riurikid Dynasty in Early Rus'?  |url=https://brill.com/view/journals/css/52/1/article-p30_2.xml |journal=Canadian-American Slavic Studies |publisher= |volume=52 |issue=1 |pages=30–49 |doi=10.1163/22102396-05201009}}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Ostrowski |first1=Donald |date=2018 |title=Was There a Riurikid Dynasty in Early Rus'?  |url=https://brill.com/view/journals/css/52/1/article-p30_2.xml |journal=Canadian-American Slavic Studies |publisher= |volume=52 |issue=1 |pages=30–49 |doi=10.1163/22102396-05201009}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Grand Prince of Kiev}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Grand Prince of Kiev}}
[[Category:Grand Princes of Kiev| ]]
[[Category:Grand princes of Kiev| ]]
[[Category:Lists of princes|Kiev, Grand Prince of]]
[[Category:Lists of princes|Kiev, Grand Prince of]]
[[Category:Noble titles of Kievan Rus]]
[[Category:Noble titles of Kievan Rus']]
[[Category:Kyiv-related lists]]
[[Category:Kyiv-related lists]]

Latest revision as of 22:33, 12 November 2024

Grand Prince of Kiev
Details
First monarchOleg the Wise
(first undisputed "Prince of Kiev")[1]
Yaroslav the Wise
(first undisputed "Grand Prince of Kiev")[2]

The Grand Prince of Kiev (sometimes grand duke) was the title of the monarch of Kievan Rus', residing in Kiev (modern Kyiv) from the 10th to 13th centuries.[citation needed] In the 13th century, Kiev became an appanage principality first of the grand prince of Vladimir and the Mongol Golden Horde governors, and later was taken over by the Grand Duchy of Lithuania.[citation needed]

Rus' chronicles such as the Primary Chronicle are inconsistent in applying the title "grand prince" to various princes in Kievan Rus'.[3] Although most sources consistently attribute it to the prince of Kiev,[3] there is no agreement which princes were also "grand prince", and scholars have thus come up with different lists of grand princes of Kiev.[4]

Background

Origins

Regnal list in the opening lines of the Khlebnikov Codex: 'In Kiev, the first to begin reigning together were Dinar and Askold, after them came Olga, after Olga Igor...'[5]

According to a founding myth in the Primary Chronicle, Kyi, Shchek and Khoryv and their sister Lybid co-founded the city of Kiev (Kyiv), and the oldest brother Kyi was "chief of his kin" (Old East Slavic: кнѧжаше в родѣ, romanized: knyazhashe v rodie).[6] Some western historians (i.e., Kevin Alan Brook) suppose that Kiev was founded by Khazars or Magyars. Kiev is a Turkic place name (Küi = riverbank + ev = settlement).[7] At least during the 8th and 9th centuries Kiev functioned as an outpost of the Khazar empire (a hill-fortress, called Sambat, "high place" in Old Turkic). According to Omeljan Pritsak, Constantine Zuckerman and other scholars, Khazars lost Kiev at the beginning of the 10th century.[8][9]

At some point, Rurik, a Varangian prince, allegedly founded the "Rurik dynasty" (named after him in the 16th century) in 862 through the "calling of the Varangians", but he is considered to be a legendary, mythical and perhaps even entirely fictional character by modern scholars.[a] The Primary Chronicle never calls Rurik a prince of Kiev; the passage wherein Oleg "sat in Kiev" (Old East Slavic: понелѣже сѣде въ Кыевѣ, romanized: ponelѣzhe sѣde v" Kyyevѣ) makes no mention of Rurik, suggesting the author was 'more interested in the first Rus' ruler to reside in Kiev than with any founder of a dynasty'.[12]

Kiev was captured by Askold and Dir, whose existence is also debatable, and are called "boyars" who "did not belong to [Rurik's] family" by the Primary Chronicle.[13][1] According to some Russian historians (i.e., Gleb S. Lebedev), Dir was a chacanus of Rhos (Rus khagan).[14] Thomas Noonan asserts that one of the Rus "sea-kings", the "High king", adopted the title khagan in the early 9th century.[15] Peter Benjamin Golden maintained that the Rus became a part of the Khazar federation, and that their ruler was officially accepted as a vassal khagan of the Khazar Khagan of Itil.[16]

Before the mid-15th century, no historical source claims that Rurik founded a dynasty;[17] the Hypatian Codex of c. 1425 began its list of knyazi of Kiev with "Dir and Askold", then "Oleg", then "Igor", up to 1240, and does not mention Rurik anywhere.[18] Similarly, the Khlebnikov Codex starts with a regnal list stating: 'In Kiev, the first to begin reigning together were Dinar and Askold, after them came Olga, after Olga Igor, after Igor Sviatoslav, (...)'.[5] There is no mention of a "Rurik"; instead, the list starts with "Dinar and Askold".[19] Unlike Hypatian's second place for Oleg the Wise,[18] however, Khlebnikov appears to assert Olga of Kiev succeeded them, and preceded her own husband Igor of Kiev.[5]

First princes

Askold and Dir are narrated to have been killed in 882 by Oleg, the first "prince" (knyaz) of Kiev according to the Primary Chronicle, but not yet a "grand prince" (velikiy knyaz).[1][12] His relation to Rurik is debatable, and has been rejected by several modern scholars.[20] Although later Muscovite chroniclers would call Oleg a "grand prince" and Kiev a "grand principality" (Old East Slavic: великое княжение, romanized: velikoe knyazhenie), the earliest sources do not.[21] Whereas the reconstructed original Greek text of the Rusʹ–Byzantine Treaty (907) calls Oleg a μεγας ἄρχων or "great archon" ("ruler"), the Old East Slavic translations found in the Laurentian Codex and Hypatian Codex do not.[22] On the other hand, only when the Byzantine emperors Leo VI the Wise, Alexander and Constantine VII are called "the Great", Oleg is also called "the Great".[22] Dimnik (2004) argued it should thus be read as "the Rus' prince Oleg the Great" instead of "Oleg the grand prince of Rus'".[22] Similarly, the only occasions Igor of Kiev is ever called velikiy knyaz in the Primary Chronicle (six times) are all found in the Rusʹ–Byzantine Treaty (945), where the Greek emperors are also called k velikiy tsesarem Grech'-skim ("to the great Greek caesars").[22] The same happens when, after Sviatoslav's invasion of Bulgaria, the 971 peace treaty is recorded; it is the only place in the Primary Chronicle where Sviatoslav I is named a velikiy knyaz.[22] Most significantly, the Nachal'nyy svod (found only in the Novgorod First Chronicle) never mentions any of these peace treaties, and never calls Oleg, Igor or Sviatoslav a velikiy knyaz.[23] According to Dimnik (2004), this means that Greek scribes added the word "great" to the princely title, whereas the Rus' themselves did not, except when translating these three treaties from Greek into Slavic.[23]

Yaropolk I of Kiev and Volodimer I of Kiev are both steadily referred to as just a knyaz by the Novgorod First Chronicle and the Laurentian and Hypatian Codices.[24] There is one exception: the Hypatian Codex writes Volodimir knyaz velikii ("Volodimir the grand prince") when reporting the latter's death; because the Hypatian Codex is the latest source of the three (compiled c. 1425), this is probably a later interpolation.[24] A Paterik of the Kyiv Pechersk Lavra of the early 13th century also calls Volodimer a velikiy knyaz, but that was written two centuries after his death, and may not necessarily describe how he was known while alive.[25] The oldest surviving source available is Hilarion of Kiev's Sermon on Law and Grace (c. 1040s), which calls Volodimer a kagan (a Khazar title) rather than a knyaz.[25] Some scholars have suggested that this indicates Kievan Rus' had won its independence from the Khazars in the early 10th century, and had inherited the title of kagan from them, before exchanging it for knyaz later.[25] The Church Statute of Prince Volodimir starts with "Behold, I, Prince Vasilii, called Volodimir," (Old East Slavic: Се аз, князь Василий, нарицаемыи Володимир, romanized: Se yaz, knyaz' Vasilii, naritsayemy Volodimir,[26]), but later in the text he interchangeably calls himself knyaz and velikiy knyaz, and the earliest copy of this document is from the 14th century, so it is difficult to say what the lost original text said.[26] Since chroniclers also regularly referred to Volodimer as velikiy without mentioning his title – the reason why he has become known to history as Volodimer "the Great" – suggests that this adjective was not part of his title, but a sobriquet or nickname, that was also applied to other monarchs or clerics around him.[27]

Velikiy knyaz Yaroslav and descendants

Sviatopolk I of Kiev was never called velikiy knyaz ("grand prince") in any source.[28] Moreover, he has been stigmatised by chroniclers with the nickname "the Accursed" or "the Damned" (okayannyy) because of how he violently rose to power in the war of succession following Volodimir's death in 1015.[28] On the other hand, Yaroslav the Wise is the first widely attested velikiy knyaz ("grand prince") in virtually all sources of the second half of the 11th century, and surviving copies of the Church Statute of Prince Yaroslav also strongly suggest he applied the title to himself while he was alive.[29] Dimnik (2004) concluded that by the end of Yaroslav's reign in the third quarter of the 11th century, he was regularly calling himself and being called the velikiy knyaz of Kiev, and the competing titles of kagan and tsar had decisively lost in favour of velikiy knyaz as the preferred appellation of the Kievan monarch.[30] The velikiy knyaz was designated by genealogical seniority and given the right to reign from Kiev – the grand principality superior to all other principalities in the realm – over all other princes descended from Yaroslav.[31] The reason why the system of succession did not always work as Yaroslav intended was because some princes simply usurped power through a coup d'état at the court in Kiev.[32] The 1097 Council of Liubech upgraded the dynastic capitals of the inner circle of senior princes to grand principalities as well, but still acknowledged the superiority of Kiev.[32]

It was not until the Sack of Kiev (1169) by Andrey Bogolyubsky of Vladimir-Suzdal that the grand princes of Vladimir launched a fierce competition with the grand princes of Kiev over who had primacy over the entire realm.[32] Since then, the phrase "velikiy knyaz of Kiev" was merely titular, and chroniclers applied the symbolic title of velikiy knyaz to Kiev or Vladimir on the Klyazma according to whomever they favoured.[32] In practice, the military supremacy of any particular prince – especially from Vsevolod the Big Nest onwards – would determine whether the other princes would or would not acknowledge him as "grand prince".[33] After the Mongol invasion of Kievan Rus' and Sack of Kiev in the late 1230s and 1240s, the khans of the Golden Horde "in effect, terminated the office of the velikiy knyaz' of Kiev and conferred political supremacy on their puppet in Vladimir."[34]

Princes of Kiev

Name Lifespan Ruled From Ruled Until Notes
Oleg[35] ?–912/922/940s[35] 881/2 or 889[36] 912/922/940s[35] First knyaz ("prince") of Kiev.[1][12] Relation to Rurik and Igor is disputed.[35] Date of accession is unclear in the Primary Chronicle.[36]
Date of death is disputed:
Igor of Kiev ?–945 912 945 son of Rurik according to Primary Chronicle, but many scholars doubt or reject this claim.[b]
Olga of Kiev ?–969 945 962 (regent-consort)
Sviatoslav I[38] 942–972 962 972 son of Igor
Yaropolk I (Jaropolk)[39] 958 (960?)–980 972 980 One of Svyatoslav's two sons
Volodimir I "the Great" 958–1015 980 1015 One Svyatoslav's two sons; in 988 baptized the Rus'. The earliest sources call him just knyaz ("prince") or kagan, and nickname him Volodimir velikiy ("Volodimir the Great"); later sources also call him velikiy knyaz ("grand prince").[40]
Sviatopolk I "the Accursed"[c] 980–1019 1015 1019 origin is debatable. Is never called velikiy knyaz ("grand prince") in any source.[28]

Grand princes of Kiev

Name House Lifespan Ruled from Ruled until Notes
Yaroslav the Wise Volodimerovichi[10] 978–1054 1019 1054 son of Vladimir the Great, jointly with Mstislav in 1024–36.
First widely attested velikiy knyaz ("grand prince") in virtually all contemporary sources.[2]
Iziaslav I[41] Volodimerovichi[10] 1024–1078 1054 1073[41] son of Yaroslav, first time (in 1068/69 lost state power to Polotsk princes)
Sviatoslav II[41] Volodimerovichi[10] 1027–1076 1073[41] 1076[41] son of Yaroslav
Vsevolod I

Volodimerovichi[10]

1030-1093 1076 1077 son of Yaroslav, first time
Iziaslav I[41] Volodimerovichi[10] 1024–1078 1077[41] 1078 second time,[41] in 1075 Pope Gregory VII sent him a crown from Rome
Vsevolod I Volodimerovichi[10] 1030–1093 1078 1093 second time
Sviatopolk II Iziaslavichi 1050–1113 1093 1113 son of Iziaslav I
Vladimir II Monomakh Monomakhovychi 1053–1125 1113 1125 son of Vsevolod I
Mstislav I of Kiev[42] Monomakhovychi 1076–1132 1125[42] 1132[42] son of Vladimir II
Yaropolk II[43] Monomakhovychi 1082–1139 1132[42] 1139[44] brother of Mstislav I
Viacheslav I Monomakhovychi 1083–1154 1139 1139 brother of Yaropolk II (first time)
Vsevolod II[44] Olgovichi ?–1146 1139[44] 1146 son of Oleh Svyatoslavich
Igor II Olgovichi ?–1147 1146 1146 brother of Vsevolod II
Iziaslav II Iziaslavichi (Monomakh) 1097–1154 1146 1149 son of Mstislav I (first time)
Yuri Dolgorukiy Yurievichi (Monomakh) 1099–1157 1149 1151 (first time)
Viacheslav I Monomakhovychi 1083–1154 1151 1154 (second time) jointly
Iziaslav II Iziaslavichi 1097–1154 (second time) jointly
Rostislav I Rostislavichi (Monomakh) 1110–1167 1154 1154 brother of Iziaslav II (first time)
Iziaslav III Olgovichi ?–1162 1154 1155 (first time)
Yuri I Dolgorukiy[44] Yurievichi 1099–1157 1155[44] 1157[44] (second time)
Iziaslav III Olgovichi ?–1162 1157 1158 (second time)
Rostislav I[44] Rostislavichi 1110–1167 1158[44] 1167[44] (second time) jointly with Iziaslav III in 1162
Mstislav II Iziaslavichi ?–1172 1167 1169 son of Iziaslav II (first time)
Gleb[44] Yurievichi ?–1171 1169[44] 1169 son of Yuri Dolgorukiy (first time)
Mstislav II Iziaslavichi ?–1172 1170 1170 (second time)
Gleb Yurievichi ?–1171 1170 1171 (second time)
Vladimir III Mstislavich Monomakhovychi 1132–1171 1171 1171 son of Mstislav I the Great. Reigned 5 February – 10 May 1171.[45]: 306–307 
Michael I Yurievichi ?–1176 1171 1171 half-brother of Gleb
Roman I Rostislavichi ?–1180 1171 1173 son of Rostislav I (first time)
Vsevolod III the Big Nest Yurievichi 1154–1212 1173 1173 brother of Michael I
Rurik Rostislavich Rostislavichi ?–1215 1173 1173 brother of Roman I (first time)
Sviatoslav III Olgovichi ?–1194 1174 1174 son of Vsevolod II (first time)
Yaroslav II Iziaslavichi ?–1180 1174 1175 son of Iziaslav II (first time)
Roman I Rostislavichi ?–1180 1175 1177 (second time)
Sviatoslav III[44] Olgovichi ?–1194 1177[44] 1180 (second time)
Yaroslav II Iziaslavichi ?–1180 1180 1180 (second time)
Rurik Rostislavich Rostislavichi ?–1215 1180 1182 (second time)
Sviatoslav III Olgovichi ?–1194 1182 1194 (third time)
Rurik Rostislavich Rostislavichi ?–1215 1194 1202 (third time)
Igor III Iziaslavichi ?–? 1202 1202 son of Yaroslav II (first time)
Rurik Rostislavich Rostislavichi ?–1215 1203 1206 jointly (fourth time)
Roman II the Great Romanovichi (Iziaslavichi) 1160–1205 son of Mstislav II, jointly (1203–05)
Rostislav II Rostislavichi 1173–1214 son of Rurik Rostislavich, jointly (1204–06)
Vsevolod IV the Red Olgovichi ?–1212 1206 1207 son of Sviatoslav III (first time)
Rurik Rostislavich Rostislavichi ?–1215 1207 1210 (fifth time)
Vsevolod IV the Red Olgovichi ?–1212 1210 1212 (second time)
Igor III Iziaslavichi ?–? 1212 1214 (second time)
Mstislav III Rostislavichi ?–1223 1214 1223 son of Roman I
Vladimir IV Rostislavichi 1187–1239 1223 1235 brother of Rostislav II
Iziaslav IV Olgovichi or
Rostislavichi
1186–? 1235 1236 son of Vladimir Igorevich or Mstislav
Yaroslav III Yurievichi 1191–1246 1236 1238 son of Vsevolod the Big Nest (first time)
Michael II Olgovichi 1185–1246 1238 1239 son of Vsevolod IV (first time)
Daniel of Galicia Romanovichi 1201–1264 1239 1240 son of Roman the Great
appointed Voivode Dmytro as his governor, while residing in Halych

Overview of princely branches of Kiev (1019–1169)

Princely branches of Kiev from Yaroslav the Wise until 1169
Volodimerovichi
Yaroslav the Wise
Sviatoslav IIVsevolod I
Olgovichi of Chernigov
Oleg I of Chernigov
Davyd of ChernigovMonomakhovichi
Vladimir II Monomakh
Vsevolod IIIgor IIIziaslav IIIMstislavichi
Mstislav I
Yaropolk IIViacheslavYurievichi of Suzdalia
Yuri Dolgorukiy
Sviatoslav IIIIzyaslavichi of Volhynia
Iziaslav II
Rostislavichi of Smolensk
Rostislav I
Vladimir IIIAndrey
Bogolyubsky
GlebMikhail
Mstislav II


Princes of Kiev after the Mongol conquest of Kiev

Due to the Mongol invasion of Kievan Rus' 1240, Michael of Chernigov left Kiev to seek military assistance from King Béla IV of Hungary. During that time, Prince Rostislav of Smolensk occupied Kiev, but was captured the same year by Daniel of Galicia who placed his voivode Dmytro to govern Kiev on his behalf while he resided in Halych. Being unsuccessful in Hungary, Michael visited Konrad I of Masovia. Receiving no results in Poland, he eventually asked Daniel of Galicia for asylum due to the Mongol invasion. Since the 14th century, the principality of Kiev started to fall under the influence of Grand Duchy of Lithuania. In 1299, the Metropolitan of Kiev Maximus moved his metropolitan see from Kiev to Vladimir-on-Klyazma. In 1321, after the battle on the Irpin River, Gediminas installed Mindgaugas, one of his subjects from the house of Olshanski, a descendant of the family of Vseslav of Polotsk that was exiled to the Byzantine Empire. In 1331, Kiev was once again taken by a member of the Siverski house (Olgovichi branch), the prince of Putivl. After Grand Duke Algirdas defeated the Golden Horde at the Battle of Blue Waters in 1362, he incorporated Kiev and its surrounding areas into the Grand Duchy of Lithuania.

Name House Lifespan Ruled from Ruled until Notes
Michael II Svyatoslavichi (Olgovichi) 1185–1246 1241 1243 (second time)
Yaroslav III Yurievichi (Monomakh) 1191–1246 1243 1246 (second time)
Alexander Nevsky Vladimirsky (Monomakh) 1220–1263 1246 1263 son of Yaroslav III
Yaroslav IV Vladimirsky (Monomakh) 1230–1271 1263 1271 brother of Alexander
Lev Galicia (Monomakh) 1228–1301 1271 1301 son of Daniel
Iziaslav IV Vladimirovich Siverski (Olgovichi) ?–? 1301 ?
Stanislav Ivanovich Siverski (Olgovichi) 1228–1301 ? 1321
Mindaugas Holshanski Alšėniškiai ?–? 1321 1324 son of Holsha Romanovich
Algimantas-Michael Alšėniškiai ?–? 1324 1331[46] son of Mindaugas
Fyodor (Teodoras) Siverski (Olgovichi) ?–? 1331 1362 son of Ivan
Vladimir V Algirdaitis Gediminids ?–? 1362 1394 son of Algirdas
Skirgaila Gediminids 1354–1397 1395 1397 son of Algirdas
Ivan Olshansky Alšėniškiai ?–? 1397 c. 1402 son of Algimantas (in 1404–11 Jurgis Gedgaudas as voivode)
Andrew Alšėniškiai ?–? c. 1412 c. 1422 son of Ivan
Michael IV Alšėniškiai ?–1433 c. 1422 c. 1432 son of Ivan
Michael V Boloban Alšėniškiai ?–1435 c. 1433 c. 1435 son of Simonas
Boleslav (Švitrigaila) Gediminids 1370–1452 1432 1440 son of Algirdas
Alexander-Olelko Olelkovich ?–1454 1443 1454 son of Vladimir
Simeon Olelkovich Olelkovich 1418–1470 1454 1470 son of Alexander

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Christian Raffensperger (2012, 2017), Ostrowski (2018), Halperin (2022).[10][11]
  2. ^ Including Hrushevsky (1904), Vernadsky (1943), Riasanovsky (1947), Paszkiewicz (1954), Franklin and Shepard (1996).[20]
  3. ^ The Old Slavonic is Свѧтопълкъ in the Cyrillic alphabet, the modern Ukrainian is Святополк, Polish is Świętopełk, Czech is Svatopluk, and Slovak is Svätopluk. Reconstructed, his name is Sventopluk. More commonly, his name is given in its Latin and Frankish equivalents: Suentopolcus, Suatopluk, Zventopluk, Zwentibald, Zwentibold, Zuentibold, or Zuentibald.

References

  1. ^ a b c d Dimnik 2004, p. 259.
  2. ^ a b Dimnik 2004, p. 264–265, 306.
  3. ^ a b Dimnik 2004, p. 253.
  4. ^ Dimnik 2004, p. 253–254.
  5. ^ a b c Jusupović 2022, p. 12.
  6. ^ Cross & Sherbowitz-Wetzor 1930, p. 54–55.
  7. ^ "An Introduction to the History of Khazaria". www.khazaria.com.
  8. ^ Pritsak, Omeljan (1981). The origin of Rus. Cambridge, Mass.: Distributed by Harvard University Press for the Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute.
  9. ^ Zuckerman, Constantine (2007). The Khazars and Byzantium – The First Encounter. In The World of the Khazars: New Perspectives – Selected Papers from the Jerusalem 1999 International Khazar Colloquium, eds. Peter Benjamin Golden, Haggai Ben-Shammai, and András Róna-Tas, pp. 399–432. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.
  10. ^ a b c d e f g Halperin 2022, p. viii.
  11. ^ Ostrowski 2018, p. 47.
  12. ^ a b c Ostrowski 2018, p. 32.
  13. ^ Cross & Sherbowitz-Wetzor 1930, p. 60.
  14. ^ Duczko, Wladyslaw (2004). Viking Rus: Studies on the Presence of Scandinavians in Eastern Europe. Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. ISBN 90-04-13874-9
  15. ^ Noonan, Thomas (2001). The Khazar Qaghanate and Its Impact on the Early Rus' State: The translatio imperii from Itil to Kiev. Nomads in the Sedentary World, Anatoly Mikhailovich Khazanov and Andre Wink, eds. p. 76-102. Richmond, England: Curzon. ISBN 0-7007-1370-0
  16. ^ Golden, Peter Benjamin (1982). The Question of the Rus' Qaganate. Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi. pp. 77–92
  17. ^ Ostrowski 2018, p. 30–31.
  18. ^ a b Ostrowski 2018, p. 36.
  19. ^ Jusupović 2022, p. 12–13.
  20. ^ a b Ostrowski 2018, p. 30–31, 39.
  21. ^ Dimnik 2004, p. 259–260.
  22. ^ a b c d e Dimnik 2004, p. 260.
  23. ^ a b Dimnik 2004, p. 260–261.
  24. ^ a b Dimnik 2004, p. 261.
  25. ^ a b c Dimnik 2004, p. 262.
  26. ^ a b Dimnik 2004, p. 262–263.
  27. ^ Dimnik 2004, p. 263–264.
  28. ^ a b c Dimnik 2004, p. 264.
  29. ^ Dimnik 2004, p. 264–265.
  30. ^ Dimnik 2004, p. 306.
  31. ^ Dimnik 2004, p. 306–307.
  32. ^ a b c d Dimnik 2004, p. 307.
  33. ^ Dimnik 2004, p. 307–308.
  34. ^ Dimnik 2004, p. 308.
  35. ^ a b c d Ostrowski 2018, p. 42–44.
  36. ^ a b Ostrowski 2018, p. 44.
  37. ^ a b c Ostrowski 2018, p. 42–43.
  38. ^ Leszek Moczulski (2007). Narodziny Międzymorza. Bellona. p. 475.
  39. ^ Ярополк is modern Ukrainian, Jaropełk is Polish, Jaropluk is Czech, Jaropelkas is Lithuanian, Iaropelkos is Greek, Jaropolk is German and Swedish.
  40. ^ Dimnik 2004, p. 261–264.
  41. ^ a b c d e f g h Martin 2004, p. 32.
  42. ^ a b c d Martin 2004, p. 102.
  43. ^ Martin 2004, p. xvii, 102.
  44. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Martin 2004, p. xvii.
  45. ^ Makhnovets, Leonid (1984). "Літопис Руський. Роки 1169 — 1174" [Rus' Chronicle. Years 1169–1174.]. litopys.org.ua (in Ukrainian). Retrieved 4 June 2024.
  46. ^ "Розділ 4.1. Леонтій Войтович. Князівські династії Східної Європи". izbornyk.org.ua. Retrieved 12 April 2018.

Bibliography