Jump to content

Talk:Ibrahim Abu el-Hawa: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
wikiprojects
 
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|blp=yes|listas=Abu el-Hawa, Ibrahim|1=
{{WPBS|class=|living=y|1=
{{WikiProject Biography|living=y|lisas=Abu el-Hawa, Ibrahim}}
{{WikiProject Biography}}
{{WikiProject Palestine}}
{{WikiProject Palestine}}
}}
}}

== Heavy reliance on Fn. 3, which should not be used for BLP ==

Per [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Closing_(archived)_RfC:_Mondoweiss this], Mondoweiss should not be used for BLP. I would go for removing the sources content, but a replacement with an RS sounds reasonable as well. Can someone find one? [[User:FortunateSons|FortunateSons]] ([[User talk:FortunateSons|talk]]) 20:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

:(Author is a journalist, so keeping it despite BLP rules to give others time to respond) [[User:FortunateSons|FortunateSons]] ([[User talk:FortunateSons|talk]]) 20:51, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
:Thanks for catching this. I haven't been able to find a reliable source quite yet to replace the Mondoweiss citation, but I'm sure there's something out there, potentially in a Hebrew or Arabic-language source. Thoughts on removing the Mondoweiss citations and leaving the info with a "citation needed" tag? [[User:ForsythiaJo|ForsythiaJo]] ([[User talk:ForsythiaJo|talk]]) 21:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
::Thank you for taking the time.
::I have replaced it with cn per your suggestion, and wish you the very best of luck with researching.
::If you’re willing to take the time, an improved source for the HuffPost (based on their disputed reliability for international politics) may be optimal as well, but that’s really not urgent IMO. [[User:FortunateSons|FortunateSons]] ([[User talk:FortunateSons|talk]]) 21:47, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 10:12, 13 November 2024

Heavy reliance on Fn. 3, which should not be used for BLP

[edit]

Per this, Mondoweiss should not be used for BLP. I would go for removing the sources content, but a replacement with an RS sounds reasonable as well. Can someone find one? FortunateSons (talk) 20:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Author is a journalist, so keeping it despite BLP rules to give others time to respond) FortunateSons (talk) 20:51, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for catching this. I haven't been able to find a reliable source quite yet to replace the Mondoweiss citation, but I'm sure there's something out there, potentially in a Hebrew or Arabic-language source. Thoughts on removing the Mondoweiss citations and leaving the info with a "citation needed" tag? ForsythiaJo (talk) 21:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for taking the time.
I have replaced it with cn per your suggestion, and wish you the very best of luck with researching.
If you’re willing to take the time, an improved source for the HuffPost (based on their disputed reliability for international politics) may be optimal as well, but that’s really not urgent IMO. FortunateSons (talk) 21:47, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]