Talk:60 Minutes: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 13:40, 14 November 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 60 Minutes article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 7 days

60 Minutes is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 26, 2006	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
December 20, 2006	Good article nominee	Not listed
January 4, 2021	Good article nominee	Not listed

Current status: Former featured article candidate

Television High‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as High-importance).

Media High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Opening

The very start must say this is the number 1 watched new program in the US. This is extremely significant. Firnanda.Reena (talk) 19:57, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Add Kamala answer swap controversy

I feel like there's enough of something here to add a section under Controversies. https://www.foxnews.com/media/cbs-60-minutes-airs-two-different-answers-from-vp-harris-same-question https://www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-news/60-minutes-statement-trump-accusation-kamala-harris-interview-1235138865/ Official statement by 60 minutes: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/60-minutes-statement/ 66.219.234.62 (talk) 03:17, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree add the current lawsuit coming up between CBS and Trump. https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/a-statement-from-60-minutes/ 2600:8804:169C:4600:A494:7CD:E7A7:C6BF (talk) 07:44, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Herbert v. Lando

Add a section in Controversies about the case Herbert v. Lando related to the February 4, 1973 episode which involved U.S. Court of Appeals and SCOTUS cases. - DutchTreat (talk) 13:27, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{talk page|archive_age=7|archive_bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}}
+{{talk page}}
 {{User:MiszaBot/config
 | algo                = old(7d)
@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 }}
+== Opening ==
-== Why is there a Wikipedia article about 60 minutes (This is the TV show, my bad) ==
-Like why? [[User:Switory|Switory]] ([[User talk:Switory|talk]]) 20:56, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
+The very start must say this is the number 1 watched new program in the US. This is extremely significant. [[User:Firnanda.Reena|Firnanda.Reena]] ([[User talk:Firnanda.Reena|talk]]) 19:57, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
+== Add Kamala answer swap controversy ==
-== New magazine ==
+I feel like there's enough of something here to add a section under Controversies.
-What makes 60 Minutes a [[News magazine]]? [[User:Firnanda.Reena|Firnanda.Reena]] ([[User talk:Firnanda.Reena|talk]]) 04:12, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
+https://www.foxnews.com/media/cbs-60-minutes-airs-two-different-answers-from-vp-harris-same-question
+https://www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-news/60-minutes-statement-trump-accusation-kamala-harris-interview-1235138865/
+Official statement by 60 minutes:
+https://www.cbsnews.com/news/60-minutes-statement/ [[Special:Contributions/66.219.234.62|66.219.234.62]] ([[User talk:66.219.234.62|talk]]) 03:17, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
+:I agree add the current lawsuit coming up between CBS and Trump. https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/a-statement-from-60-minutes/ [[Special:Contributions/2600:8804:169C:4600:A494:7CD:E7A7:C6BF|2600:8804:169C:4600:A494:7CD:E7A7:C6BF]] ([[User talk:2600:8804:169C:4600:A494:7CD:E7A7:C6BF|talk]]) 07:44, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
-:{{ping|Firnanda.Reena}} The term "magazine" was associated with the show starting with the first episode in 1968: {{cite news |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/video/1968-opener-for-60-minutes-a-kind-of-a-magazine-for-television/ |title=1968 opener for 60 Minutes, "a kind of a magazine for television" |publisher=[[CBS News]] }}. The show follows a similar formula to ''[[Panorama (British TV programme)|Panorama]]'' on the BBC starting 1953.
-:Is there a section in the article that needs to be expanded?  - [[User:DutchTreat|DutchTreat]] ([[User talk:DutchTreat|talk]]) 11:40, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
-:This is no longer magazine. This is a TV show. :) [[User:Firnanda.Reena|Firnanda.Reena]] ([[User talk:Firnanda.Reena|talk]]) 18:48, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
-== Investigative journalism ==
+== Herbert v. Lando ==
+Add a section in ''Controversies'' about the case [[Anthony Herbert (lieutenant colonel)#Herbert v. Lando|Herbert v. Lando]] related to the February 4, 1973 episode which involved U.S. Court of Appeals and SCOTUS cases. - [[User:DutchTreat|DutchTreat]] ([[User talk:DutchTreat|talk]]) 13:27, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
-Is this [[Investigative journalism]]? [[User:Firnanda.Reena|Firnanda.Reena]] ([[User talk:Firnanda.Reena|talk]]) 04:22, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
-:According to {{cite news |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/secret-world-behind-60-minutes-435629/ |title=The Secret World Behind ’60 Minutes’ |first=Marisa |last=Guthrie |publisher=The Hollywood Reporter |date=April 10, 2013 |quote=mix of hard-news investigations, soft features and behind-the-scenes profiles of people ... ''60 Minutes'' has changed little since the CBS News program debuted 45 years ago. Among the last redoubts on television for '''investigative reporting''', especially overseas... }}
-:Please expand upon your question. Is the article lacking in some way? - [[User:DutchTreat|DutchTreat]] ([[User talk:DutchTreat|talk]]) 11:29, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
-::This needs to say that this is [[investigative journalism]] [[User:Firnanda.Reena|Firnanda.Reena]] ([[User talk:Firnanda.Reena|talk]]) 18:48, 2 August 2024 (UTC)