A Problem from Hell: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Add notes - questions about what reviews said |
m Redirect bypass from Pulitzer Prize for General Non-Fiction to Pulitzer Prize for General Nonfiction using popups |
||
| (27 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|Book by Samantha Power}} |
|||
{{Infobox book |
{{Infobox book |
||
| name = A Problem from Hell |
| name = A Problem from Hell |
||
| Line 5: | Line 6: | ||
| country = United States |
| country = United States |
||
| subject = [[Genocide]], [[U.S. foreign policy]] |
| subject = [[Genocide]], [[U.S. foreign policy]] |
||
| genre = |
| genre = Nonfiction |
||
| publisher = [[Basic Books]] |
| publisher = [[Basic Books]] |
||
| pub_date = February 20, 2002 |
| pub_date = February 20, 2002 |
||
| Line 14: | Line 15: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
'''''"A Problem from Hell": America and the Age of Genocide''''' (2002) is a book by American [[Samantha Power]], at that time Professor of Human Rights Practice at Harvard's [[John F. Kennedy School of Government]], which explores the United States's understanding of, response to, and inaction on |
'''''"A Problem from Hell": America and the Age of Genocide''''' (2002) is a book by American [[Samantha Power]], at that time Professor of Human Rights Practice at Harvard's [[John F. Kennedy School of Government]], which explores the United States's understanding of, response to, and inaction on [[genocide]]s in the 20th century, from the [[Armenian genocide]] to the "[[ethnic cleansing]]s" of the [[Kosovo War]]. It won the [[J. Anthony Lukas Book Prize]] and the [[Pulitzer Prize for General Nonfiction]] in 2003. |
||
Power observes that American policymakers have been consistently reluctant to condemn mass atrocities as genocide or to take responsibility for leading an international military intervention. She argues that without significant pressure from the American public, policymakers have avoided the term "genocide" altogether, which came into more widespread use after the [[Holocaust]] of [[World War II]]. Instead, they appeal to the priority of national interests or argue that a U.S. response would be futile and accelerate violence, as a justification for inaction. She thinks such justifications are usually ill-founded.<ref name="book">Power, Samantha. ''A Problem from Hell: America and the Age of Genocide''. pp. xvii-xviii. Basic Books, 2002. {{ISBN|0-465-06150-8}}</ref> |
Power observes that American policymakers have been consistently reluctant to condemn mass atrocities as genocide or to take responsibility for leading an international military intervention. She argues that without significant pressure from the American public, policymakers have avoided the term "genocide" altogether, which came into more widespread use after the [[Holocaust]] of [[World War II]]. Instead, they appeal to the priority of national interests or argue that a U.S. response would be futile and accelerate violence, as a justification for inaction. She thinks such justifications are usually ill-founded.<ref name="book">Power, Samantha. ''A Problem from Hell: America and the Age of Genocide''. pp. xvii-xviii. Basic Books, 2002. {{ISBN|0-465-06150-8}}</ref> |
||
==Summary== |
==Summary== |
||
Power begins with an outline of the international response to the [[Armenian |
Power begins with an outline of the international response to the [[Armenian genocide]] (Chapter 1). She next describes [[Raphael Lemkin]]'s efforts to lobby for American action against [[Nazi]] atrocities in Europe (Chapter 2). She expands on the difficulties encountered by individuals who tried to convince US representatives and other members of the [[Allies of World War II|Allied Powers]] to recognize the [[Holocaust]]. She says this difficulty was compounded by the Allies focus on [[World War II]] and suggests that much indifference was based in anti-Semitic attitudes (Chapter 3). |
||
She recounts how Lemkin brought genocide to the forefront of foreign policy issues after the war, leading to the 1948 U.N. [[Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide]]. Lemkin had mounting disappointments and multiplying adversaries until his death in 1959. Senator [[William Proxmire]] ( |
She recounts how Lemkin brought genocide to the forefront of foreign policy issues after the war, leading to the 1948 U.N. [[Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide]]. Lemkin had mounting disappointments and multiplying adversaries until his death in 1959. Senator [[William Proxmire]] (D-Wisconsin) and others took over fighting for preventing genocides and encouraging US leadership on this issue. Senator Proxmire and Republican President [[Ronald Reagan]] worked to gain support during his administration for the ratification of the [[Genocide Convention]] (Chapter 7). In the rest of the book, she focuses on genocides in individual nations and the U.S. response to such crises in Algeria, Cambodia, Iraq, Bosnia, Rwanda, and Kosovo. |
||
==Reception== |
==Reception== |
||
| Line 28: | Line 29: | ||
Martin Woollacott reviewed the book, along with ''[[We Did Nothing]]'' by [[Linda Polman]], for ''[[The Guardian]]''. He concluded: |
Martin Woollacott reviewed the book, along with ''[[We Did Nothing]]'' by [[Linda Polman]], for ''[[The Guardian]]''. He concluded: |
||
<blockquote>"We have yet to work out properly how the post-twin towers interventions relate to those that went before. But there is obvious irony in the fact that while previously, as these books illustrate so clearly, determination was often lacking to deal with crises that most people agreed were serious, there was no shortage of it when the Bush administration moved to deal with a crisis on which there was no global consensus at all."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/books/2003/jul/05/highereducation.news|title = Too little, too late. From Rwanda to the Balkans, the 90s was the decade of botched interventions. Martin Woollacott on two studies of the west's failure to confront genocide from Samantha Power and Linda Polman|last = Woollacott|first = Martin|date = July 4, 2003| |
<blockquote>"We have yet to work out properly how the post-twin towers interventions relate to those that went before. But there is obvious irony in the fact that while previously, as these books illustrate so clearly, determination was often lacking to deal with crises that most people agreed were serious, there was no shortage of it when the Bush administration moved to deal with a crisis on which there was no global consensus at all."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/books/2003/jul/05/highereducation.news|title = Too little, too late. From Rwanda to the Balkans, the 90s was the decade of botched interventions. Martin Woollacott on two studies of the west's failure to confront genocide from Samantha Power and Linda Polman|last = Woollacott|first = Martin|date = July 4, 2003|access-date = June 11, 2014}}</ref></blockquote> |
||
[[Stephen Holmes (academic)|Stephen Holmes]] reviewed the book, along with ''[[War in a Time of Peace: Bush, Clinton and the Generals]]'' by [[David Halberstam]], for the '''[[London Review of Books]]''. Holmes wrote: <blockquote>"Putting an end to atrocities is a moral victory. But if the intervening force is incapable of keeping domestic support back home for the next phase, for reconstructing what it has shattered, the morality of its intervention is ephemeral at best. If political stability could be achieved by toppling a rotten dictator or if nations could be built at gunpoint, this problem would not be so pressing. Human rights cannot be reliably protected unless a locally sustained political authority is in place."<ref>{{cite |
[[Stephen Holmes (academic)|Stephen Holmes]] reviewed the book, along with ''[[War in a Time of Peace: Bush, Clinton and the Generals]]'' by [[David Halberstam]], for the '''[[London Review of Books]]''. Holmes wrote: <blockquote>"Putting an end to atrocities is a moral victory. But if the intervening force is incapable of keeping domestic support back home for the next phase, for reconstructing what it has shattered, the morality of its intervention is ephemeral at best. If political stability could be achieved by toppling a rotten dictator or if nations could be built at gunpoint, this problem would not be so pressing. Human rights cannot be reliably protected unless a locally sustained political authority is in place."<ref>{{cite journal|url=http://www.lrb.co.uk/v24/n22/stephen-holmes/looking-away|title = Looking Away|last = Holmes|first = Stephen|journal = London Review of Books|author-link = Stephen Holmes (academic)|date = November 14, 2002|volume = 24|issue = 22|access-date = June 11, 2014}}</ref></blockquote> |
||
Charles V. Peña, then affiliated with the [[Cato Institute]], reviewed the book for ''[[Reason (magazine)|Reason]]'', concluding: |
Charles V. Peña, then affiliated with the [[Cato Institute]], reviewed the book for ''[[Reason (magazine)|Reason]]'', concluding: |
||
<blockquote>"That is exactly the point of Power’s compelling narrative: The horror and tragedy of genocide is a moral issue that transcends national interest. But to prevent another [[Rwandan |
<blockquote>"That is exactly the point of Power’s compelling narrative: The horror and tragedy of genocide is a moral issue that transcends national interest. But to prevent another [[Rwandan genocide|Rwanda]], the United States must also have the wisdom to avoid another [[Battle of Mogadishu (1993)|Somalia]]."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/murder-most-foul-stop-genocide-us-must-learn-intervene-more-carefully|title = Murder Most Foul: To stop genocide, the U.S. must learn to intervene more carefully.|last = Peña|first = Charles V.|date = November 6, 2002|access-date = June 11, 2014|publisher = [[Cato Institute]] (originally published in [[Reason (magazine)|Reason]]}}</ref></blockquote> |
||
Laura Secor reviewed the book for ''[[The New York Times]]''.<ref>{{cite |
[[Laura Secor]] reviewed the book for ''[[The New York Times]]''.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/14/books/turning-a-blind-eye.html|title = Turning a Blind Eye|last = Secor|first = Laura|date = April 14, 2002|access-date = June 11, 2014|newspaper = [[The New York Times]]}}</ref> <!-- And, her conclusion? -->The book was also reviewed in ''[[Publishers Weekly]]''.<ref>{{cite magazine|url=http://www.publishersweekly.com/978-0-465-06150-1|title = "A PROBLEM FROM HELL": America and the Age of Genocide|magazine = [[Publishers Weekly]]|date = February 25, 2002|access-date = June 11, 2014}}</ref><!-- And, conclusion? --> |
||
===Awards=== |
===Awards=== |
||
*[[Pulitzer Prize for General |
*[[Pulitzer Prize for General Nonfiction]] |
||
*[[Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights]] Book Award |
*[[Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights]] Book Award |
||
*[[J. Anthony Lukas Book Prize]] |
*[[J. Anthony Lukas Book Prize]] |
||
| Line 52: | Line 53: | ||
*[https://www.c-span.org/video/?170542-1/problem-hell ''Booknotes'' interview with Power on ''A Problem From Hell'', June 16, 2002.] |
*[https://www.c-span.org/video/?170542-1/problem-hell ''Booknotes'' interview with Power on ''A Problem From Hell'', June 16, 2002.] |
||
{{Pulitzer Prize for General Nonfiction}} |
|||
{{PulitzerPrize GeneralNon-Fiction 2001–2025}} |
|||
{{Works about the Armenian Genocide}} |
|||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Problem From Hell, A}} |
{{DEFAULTSORT:Problem From Hell, A}} |
||
[[Category:2002 books |
[[Category:2002 non-fiction books]] |
||
[[Category:21st-century history books]] |
|||
[[Category:Pulitzer Prize for General Non-Fiction-winning works|Problem from Hell]] |
|||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Pulitzer Prize for General Nonfiction–winning works]] |
||
[[Category:National Book Critics Circle |
[[Category:National Book Critics Circle Award–winning works]] |
||
[[Category:International law literature]] |
[[Category:International law literature]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:History books about genocide]] |
||
[[Category:Basic Books books]] |
|||
[[Category:History books about the United States]] |
|||
Latest revision as of 05:49, 15 November 2024
.jpg) | |
| Author | Samantha Power |
|---|---|
| Subject | Genocide, U.S. foreign policy |
| Genre | Nonfiction |
| Publisher | Basic Books |
Publication date | February 20, 2002 |
| Publication place | United States |
| Media type | Hardcover |
| Pages | 640 |
| ISBN | 978-0465061501 |
| Followed by | Chasing the Flame: Sergio Vieira de Mello and the Fight to Save the World |
"A Problem from Hell": America and the Age of Genocide (2002) is a book by American Samantha Power, at that time Professor of Human Rights Practice at Harvard's John F. Kennedy School of Government, which explores the United States's understanding of, response to, and inaction on genocides in the 20th century, from the Armenian genocide to the "ethnic cleansings" of the Kosovo War. It won the J. Anthony Lukas Book Prize and the Pulitzer Prize for General Nonfiction in 2003.
Power observes that American policymakers have been consistently reluctant to condemn mass atrocities as genocide or to take responsibility for leading an international military intervention. She argues that without significant pressure from the American public, policymakers have avoided the term "genocide" altogether, which came into more widespread use after the Holocaust of World War II. Instead, they appeal to the priority of national interests or argue that a U.S. response would be futile and accelerate violence, as a justification for inaction. She thinks such justifications are usually ill-founded.[1]
Summary
[edit]Power begins with an outline of the international response to the Armenian genocide (Chapter 1). She next describes Raphael Lemkin's efforts to lobby for American action against Nazi atrocities in Europe (Chapter 2). She expands on the difficulties encountered by individuals who tried to convince US representatives and other members of the Allied Powers to recognize the Holocaust. She says this difficulty was compounded by the Allies focus on World War II and suggests that much indifference was based in anti-Semitic attitudes (Chapter 3).
She recounts how Lemkin brought genocide to the forefront of foreign policy issues after the war, leading to the 1948 U.N. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Lemkin had mounting disappointments and multiplying adversaries until his death in 1959. Senator William Proxmire (D-Wisconsin) and others took over fighting for preventing genocides and encouraging US leadership on this issue. Senator Proxmire and Republican President Ronald Reagan worked to gain support during his administration for the ratification of the Genocide Convention (Chapter 7). In the rest of the book, she focuses on genocides in individual nations and the U.S. response to such crises in Algeria, Cambodia, Iraq, Bosnia, Rwanda, and Kosovo.
Reception
[edit]Reviews
[edit]Martin Woollacott reviewed the book, along with We Did Nothing by Linda Polman, for The Guardian. He concluded:
"We have yet to work out properly how the post-twin towers interventions relate to those that went before. But there is obvious irony in the fact that while previously, as these books illustrate so clearly, determination was often lacking to deal with crises that most people agreed were serious, there was no shortage of it when the Bush administration moved to deal with a crisis on which there was no global consensus at all."[2]
Stephen Holmes reviewed the book, along with War in a Time of Peace: Bush, Clinton and the Generals by David Halberstam, for the 'London Review of Books. Holmes wrote:
"Putting an end to atrocities is a moral victory. But if the intervening force is incapable of keeping domestic support back home for the next phase, for reconstructing what it has shattered, the morality of its intervention is ephemeral at best. If political stability could be achieved by toppling a rotten dictator or if nations could be built at gunpoint, this problem would not be so pressing. Human rights cannot be reliably protected unless a locally sustained political authority is in place."[3]
Charles V. Peña, then affiliated with the Cato Institute, reviewed the book for Reason, concluding:
"That is exactly the point of Power’s compelling narrative: The horror and tragedy of genocide is a moral issue that transcends national interest. But to prevent another Rwanda, the United States must also have the wisdom to avoid another Somalia."[4]
Laura Secor reviewed the book for The New York Times.[5] The book was also reviewed in Publishers Weekly.[6]
Awards
[edit]- Pulitzer Prize for General Nonfiction
- Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights Book Award
- J. Anthony Lukas Book Prize
- National Book Critics Circle Award for General Nonfiction
- Raphael Lemkin Award (Institute for the Study of Genocide)
References
[edit]- ^ Power, Samantha. A Problem from Hell: America and the Age of Genocide. pp. xvii-xviii. Basic Books, 2002. ISBN 0-465-06150-8
- ^ Woollacott, Martin (July 4, 2003). "Too little, too late. From Rwanda to the Balkans, the 90s was the decade of botched interventions. Martin Woollacott on two studies of the west's failure to confront genocide from Samantha Power and Linda Polman". Retrieved June 11, 2014.
- ^ Holmes, Stephen (November 14, 2002). "Looking Away". London Review of Books. 24 (22). Retrieved June 11, 2014.
- ^ Peña, Charles V. (November 6, 2002). "Murder Most Foul: To stop genocide, the U.S. must learn to intervene more carefully". Cato Institute (originally published in Reason. Retrieved June 11, 2014.
- ^ Secor, Laura (April 14, 2002). "Turning a Blind Eye". The New York Times. Retrieved June 11, 2014.
- ^ ""A PROBLEM FROM HELL": America and the Age of Genocide". Publishers Weekly. February 25, 2002. Retrieved June 11, 2014.
External links
[edit]- A Problem from Hell at Open Library
- Booknotes interview with Power on A Problem From Hell, June 16, 2002.
