Jump to content

Talk:Air France Flight 178: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Rerated as Start-Class
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WPAVIATION
{{WikiProject Aviation| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> =y
|class=B
| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> =y
| b2 <!--Coverage and accuracy --> =y
| b2 <!--Coverage and accuracy --> =y
| b3 <!--Structure --> =y
| b3 <!--Structure --> =n
| b4 <!--Grammar and style --> =y
| b4 <!--Grammar and style --> =y
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> =y
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> =y
|Accident-task-force=yes}}
|Accident-task-force=yes}}
{{WikiProject France|importance=low}}
}}

==Incorrect flight number==
The correct flight number is AF 178. See http://aviatechno.net/constellation/suivi_matricule.php?mat=f-bazz --[[User:VVVF|VVVF]] ([[User talk:VVVF|talk]]) 17:27, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
::Thanks! You appear to be right, I came to the exact same conclusion. {{fixed}} —[[User:Frank Geerlings|Frank Geerlings]] ([[User talk:Frank Geerlings|talk]]) 10:23, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

== CFIT doesn't cause accidents ==

"The accident investigation established 'controlled flight into terrain (CFIT)' as the cause.[3]"
This statement is unwarranted given the source. CFIT is described as a category, not the cause. It does not cite the investigation report either. CFIT does not cause accidents. CFIT is a type of accident. This is a bit like saying "head-on collision" was the cause of a certain traffic accident. [[User:Dcs002|Dcs002]] ([[User talk:Dcs002|talk]]) 07:06, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:00, 15 November 2024

Incorrect flight number

[edit]

The correct flight number is AF 178. See http://aviatechno.net/constellation/suivi_matricule.php?mat=f-bazz --VVVF (talk) 17:27, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! You appear to be right, I came to the exact same conclusion.  FixedFrank Geerlings (talk) 10:23, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CFIT doesn't cause accidents

[edit]

"The accident investigation established 'controlled flight into terrain (CFIT)' as the cause.[3]" This statement is unwarranted given the source. CFIT is described as a category, not the cause. It does not cite the investigation report either. CFIT does not cause accidents. CFIT is a type of accident. This is a bit like saying "head-on collision" was the cause of a certain traffic accident. Dcs002 (talk) 07:06, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]