Talk:Air France Flight 178: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Petebutt moved page Talk:1953 Air France Lockheed Constellation Barcelonnette accident to Talk:1953 Air France Flight 107: comply with naming guidelines |
Rerated as Start-Class |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| |
|||
{{WPAVIATION |
|||
⚫ | |||
|class=B |
|||
⚫ | |||
| b2 <!--Coverage and accuracy --> =y |
| b2 <!--Coverage and accuracy --> =y |
||
| b3 <!--Structure --> = |
| b3 <!--Structure --> =n |
||
| b4 <!--Grammar and style --> =y |
| b4 <!--Grammar and style --> =y |
||
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> =y |
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> =y |
||
|Accident-task-force=yes}} |
|Accident-task-force=yes}} |
||
{{WikiProject France|importance=low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
==Incorrect flight number== |
|||
The correct flight number is AF 178. See http://aviatechno.net/constellation/suivi_matricule.php?mat=f-bazz --[[User:VVVF|VVVF]] ([[User talk:VVVF|talk]]) 17:27, 18 February 2014 (UTC) |
|||
::Thanks! You appear to be right, I came to the exact same conclusion. {{fixed}} —[[User:Frank Geerlings|Frank Geerlings]] ([[User talk:Frank Geerlings|talk]]) 10:23, 15 April 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== CFIT doesn't cause accidents == |
|||
"The accident investigation established 'controlled flight into terrain (CFIT)' as the cause.[3]" |
|||
This statement is unwarranted given the source. CFIT is described as a category, not the cause. It does not cite the investigation report either. CFIT does not cause accidents. CFIT is a type of accident. This is a bit like saying "head-on collision" was the cause of a certain traffic accident. [[User:Dcs002|Dcs002]] ([[User talk:Dcs002|talk]]) 07:06, 16 January 2016 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:00, 15 November 2024
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Incorrect flight number
[edit]The correct flight number is AF 178. See http://aviatechno.net/constellation/suivi_matricule.php?mat=f-bazz --VVVF (talk) 17:27, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks! You appear to be right, I came to the exact same conclusion. Fixed —Frank Geerlings (talk) 10:23, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
CFIT doesn't cause accidents
[edit]"The accident investigation established 'controlled flight into terrain (CFIT)' as the cause.[3]" This statement is unwarranted given the source. CFIT is described as a category, not the cause. It does not cite the investigation report either. CFIT does not cause accidents. CFIT is a type of accident. This is a bit like saying "head-on collision" was the cause of a certain traffic accident. Dcs002 (talk) 07:06, 16 January 2016 (UTC)