Jump to content

Premiership of Stephen Harper: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Terlow (talk | contribs)
Corrected title of cited article
 
(48 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{About|Stephen Harper's time as prime minister|the membership of the ministry and cabinet|28th Canadian Ministry}}
{{About|Stephen Harper's time as prime minister|the membership of the ministry and cabinet|28th Canadian Ministry}}
{{For|the Harper government's policies|Domestic policy of the Stephen Harper government|Economic policy of the Stephen Harper government|Environmental policy of the Stephen Harper government|Foreign policy of the Stephen Harper government}}
{{For|the Harper government's policies|Domestic policy of the Stephen Harper government|Environmental policy of the Stephen Harper government|Foreign policy of the Stephen Harper government}}
{{Use Canadian English|date=July 2013}}
{{Use Canadian English|date=July 2013}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=April 2017}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=April 2017}}
{{Infobox administration
{{Infobox administration
| image = File:Stephen-Harper-Cropped-2014-02-18.jpg
| image = File:Stephen Harper by Remy Steinegger Infobox.jpg
| name = Premiership of Stephen Harper
| name = Premiership of Stephen Harper
| term_start = February 6, 2006
| term_start = February 6, 2006
Line 19: Line 19:
| appointer = [[Michaëlle Jean]]
| appointer = [[Michaëlle Jean]]
| seat = [[Office of the Prime Minister and Privy Council|Office of the Prime Minister]]
| seat = [[Office of the Prime Minister and Privy Council|Office of the Prime Minister]]
| predecessor = [[Premiership of Paul Martin|Paul Martin]]
| predecessor = [[Paul Martin#Prime Minister (2003–2006)|Paul Martin]]
| successor = [[Premiership of Justin Trudeau|Justin Trudeau]]
| successor = [[Premiership of Justin Trudeau|Justin Trudeau]]
| official_url =
| official_url =
| seal =
}}
| seal_caption = Arms of Her Majesty The King in Right of Canada}}
{{Stephen Harper sidebar}}



The ''' premiership of Stephen Harper''' began on February 6, 2006, when the first [[Cabinet (government)|Cabinet]] headed by [[Stephen Harper]] was sworn in by [[Governor General of Canada|Governor General]] [[Michaelle Jean]]. Harper was invited to form the [[28th Canadian Ministry]] and become [[Prime Minister of Canada]] following the [[2006 Canadian federal election|2006 election]], where Harper's [[Conservative Party of Canada|Conservative Party]] won a [[plurality (voting)|plurality of seats]] in the [[House of Commons of Canada]], defeating the [[Liberal Party of Canada|Liberal]] Prime Minister [[Paul Martin]]'s government. In the [[2011 Canadian federal election|2011 federal election]], Harper won his first and only [[majority government]].
The ''' premiership of Stephen Harper''' began on February 6, 2006, when the first [[Cabinet (government)|Cabinet]] headed by [[Stephen Harper]] was sworn in by [[Governor General of Canada|Governor General]] [[Michaelle Jean]]. Harper was invited to form the [[28th Canadian Ministry]] and become [[Prime Minister of Canada]] following the [[2006 Canadian federal election|2006 federal election]], where Harper led his [[Conservative Party of Canada|Conservative Party]] to win a [[plurality (voting)|plurality of seats]] in the [[House of Commons of Canada]], defeating the [[Liberal Party of Canada|Liberal]] government of Prime Minister [[Paul Martin]]. Harper led his Conservatives to win a larger [[minority government]] in [[2008 Canadian federal election|2008]] and a [[majority government]] in [[2011 Canadian federal election|2011]]. In the [[2015 Canadian federal election|2015 federal election]], Harper's Conservatives lost power to a Liberal majority government under [[Justin Trudeau]].


==Background==
==Background==
Line 33: Line 34:


In the [[2004 Canadian federal election|2004 election]], the Liberals were reduced to a [[minority government]] due to a [[sponsorship scandal|government spending scandal]] and the success of the newly united right-of-centre opposition party. Harper went on to lead the Conservatives to win a plurality of seats in the [[2006 Canadian federal election|2006 election]]<ref>{{cite news |author=Michel Comte |date=January 24, 2006 |title=Canadian PM Martin lets dream slip away in election |agency=Agence France Presse}}</ref> and formed the smallest minority government in Canadian history.<ref>{{cite web |publisher=Parliament of Canada |url=http://www2.parl.gc.ca/Parlinfo/compilations/ElectionsAndRidings/ResultsParty.aspx?Language=E |title=Electoral Results by Party |access-date=April 26, 2011}}</ref>
In the [[2004 Canadian federal election|2004 election]], the Liberals were reduced to a [[minority government]] due to a [[sponsorship scandal|government spending scandal]] and the success of the newly united right-of-centre opposition party. Harper went on to lead the Conservatives to win a plurality of seats in the [[2006 Canadian federal election|2006 election]]<ref>{{cite news |author=Michel Comte |date=January 24, 2006 |title=Canadian PM Martin lets dream slip away in election |agency=Agence France Presse}}</ref> and formed the smallest minority government in Canadian history.<ref>{{cite web |publisher=Parliament of Canada |url=http://www2.parl.gc.ca/Parlinfo/compilations/ElectionsAndRidings/ResultsParty.aspx?Language=E |title=Electoral Results by Party |access-date=April 26, 2011}}</ref>

==First and second mandates==
{{see also|In and Out scandal}}
The Conservative platform in the 2006 election was focused on five priorities: accountability, tax reform, crime, child care and health care.<ref>{{cite web |publisher=CTV.ca News |date=January 2, 2006 |url=http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060102/harper_list_060102/20060102?s_name=election2006 |title=Harper outlines priorities of Tory government |access-date=April 26, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110514000412/http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060102/harper_list_060102/20060102?s_name=election2006 |archive-date=May 14, 2011 |df=mdy-all }}</ref>

The new government gained approval for the [[Federal Accountability Act]], which eliminated corporate and union donations to political parties, tightened lobbying rules including the cooling-off period for former civil servants and political staff, and introduced several offices to exercise independent oversight over government spending and accounting such as the [[Parliamentary Budget Officer]].<ref>{{cite web|publisher=Prime Minister's press office |date=December 12, 2006 |url=http://pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?id=1455 |title=Federal Accountability Act becomes law |access-date=April 26, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120320102112/http://pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?id=1455 |archive-date=March 20, 2012 |df=dmy }}</ref>

The federal [[Goods and Services Tax (Canada)|Goods and Services Tax (GST)]], introduced by the former Progressive Conservative government of [[Brian Mulroney]], was reduced from 7% to 6%,<ref>{{cite web|publisher=Prime Minister's press office |date=June 30, 2007 |url=http://pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?id=1230 |title=Prime Minister Stephen Harper marks GST reduction |access-date=April 26, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110927054804/http://pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?id=1230 |archive-date=September 27, 2011 |df=dmy }}</ref> and later to 5%.<ref>{{cite web|publisher=Prime Minister's press office |date=December 31, 2007 |url=http://pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?id=1953 |title=Cutting the GST to five per cent |access-date=April 26, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120320102128/http://pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?id=1953 |archive-date=March 20, 2012 |df=dmy }}</ref>

Under Harper, the government introduced several pieces of legislation as part of a "tough on crime" agenda including [[mandatory sentencing|mandatory minimum sentences]] for serious and violent offenders. Some of the legislation did not gain approval in the [[minority parliament]].<ref>{{cite web|work=Calgary Herald |date=September 16, 2008 |url=http://www.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/story.html?id=acaeeffa-e763-45e6-a603-0620583528e1 |title=Harper vows to push ahead with tough-on-crime agenda |access-date=April 26, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121110072910/http://www.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/story.html?id=acaeeffa-e763-45e6-a603-0620583528e1 |archive-date=November 10, 2012 |df=dmy }}</ref>

The previous Liberal government had begun negotiations with the provinces and reached agreements to begin to fund a publicly funded [[child care]] program. The Conservatives stopped this process, as promised in their election platform,<ref>{{cite web|publisher=CTV.ca News |date=May 4, 2006 |url=http://archivesales.ctv.ca/servlet/an/plocal/CTVNews/20060504/martin_commons_060504/20060504/?hub=TorontoNewHome |title=Martin attacks Tory child-care plan in Commons |access-date=April 26, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110811181606/http://archivesales.ctv.ca/servlet/an/plocal/CTVNews/20060504/martin_commons_060504/20060504/?hub=TorontoNewHome |archive-date=August 11, 2011 |df=dmy }}</ref> and instead launched a $1200 per year stipend for each child under age six, paid directly to parents whether or not they incur child care expenses.<ref>{{cite web |publisher=Human Resources and Skills Development Canada |url=http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/eng/family/uccb/index.shtml |title=Universal Child Care Benefit |access-date=April 26, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110317035712/http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/eng/family/uccb/index.shtml |archive-date=March 17, 2011 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> Harper pledged to work with provincial and local governments, not-for-profit organizations, and employers to create additional spaces, and budgeted $250 million per year for these initiatives.<ref>{{cite web |publisher=Human Resources and Skills Development Canada |url=http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/eng/family/child_care_spaces/index.shtml |title=Child Care Spaces |access-date=April 26, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110518170935/http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/eng/family/child_care_spaces/index.shtml |archive-date=May 18, 2011 |df=mdy-all }}</ref>

In the area of health care, the Harper government also promised to introduce a "Patient Wait Times Guarantee" in conjunction with the provinces. While they did negotiate changes to the 2004 10-year health accord with the provinces with an eye to shorten wait times,<ref>{{cite web |publisher=Prime Minister's Press Office |date=April 4, 2007 |url=http://pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?id=1611 |title=Canada's New Government announces Patient Wait Times Guarantees |access-date=April 26, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120312110904/http://www.pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?id=1611 |archive-date=March 12, 2012 |df=dmy }}</ref> Harper was criticized by ''Maclean's'' columnist [[Paul Wells]] for downplaying this fifth priority.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.macleans.ca/switchboard/columnists/article.jsp?content=20060724_130433_130433 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060719224054/http://www.macleans.ca/switchboard/columnists/article.jsp?content=20060724_130433_130433 |date=July 13, 2006 |title=Stephen Harper's new game: Hide-the-Priority |first=Paul |last=Wells |work=Maclean's |archive-date=July 19, 2006 |access-date=November 20, 2016 |url-status=dead |df=dmy }}</ref>

After taking action in these core policy areas, several media commentators suggested that the government lacked direction.<ref>{{cite web|work=Montreal Gazette |url=http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/columnists/story.html?id=ee4de5b3-ae1b-4be1-821a-dcdd3aadd386 |title=Harper's five priorities have morphed into five themes |access-date=April 26, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121110072916/http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/columnists/story.html?id=ee4de5b3-ae1b-4be1-821a-dcdd3aadd386 |archive-date=November 10, 2012 |df=dmy }}</ref> Despite having [[Fixed election dates in Canada|introduced legislation to fix election dates]] every four years beginning in October 2009, Governor General Michaëlle Jean granted a request from Harper to call [[2008 Canadian federal election|new elections in October 2008]]. Harper said he asked for this early election because the opposition parties were delaying the work of parliament, while the opposition stated Harper wanted to get a new mandate before Canada felt the effects of the [[Late-2000s recession|2008–09 global economic slowdown]].<ref>{{cite news |publisher=CBC News |date=August 26, 2008 |url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2008/08/26/harper-election.html |title=Early election call won't break any promises: Harper |access-date=April 26, 2011}}</ref>

In October 14, 2008 election, Harper and the [[Conservative Party of Canada|Conservatives]] again failed to get a majority, but increased their representation in Parliament from 127 to 143, still 12 seats short of a majority.

In the realm of [[Foreign policy of the Harper government|foreign policy]], Harper and his ministers began to move away from the internationalist agenda that was central to the Liberal Party's agenda, while supporting and joining with the administration of US President [[George W. Bush]] on a number of issues. In this period, Canada reduced its visibility in the [[United Nations]], which was seen as dominated by dictatorships. In addition, the funding and support for activities of political non-governmental organizations (NGOs) through the [[Canadian International Development Agency]] was scaled back significantly.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Canada Among Nations, 2009-2010: As Others See Us|author1=Fen Hampson |author2=Fen Osler Hampson |author3=Paul Heinbecker |publisher=McGill-Queens University Press|year=2010}}</ref>

==Third mandate==
On February 15, 2012, the House of Commons voted to eliminate the federal Long Gun Registry. The Bill received royal assent later that year. This had been a long-standing election promise and was supported by 2 members of the third party [[New Democratic Party|New Democrats]].<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2012/02/15/pol-gun-registry.html |publisher=CBC News |title=2 NDP MPs back final Commons vote to kill gun registry |date=February 16, 2012}}</ref> The registry had been cited as an example of cost overruns as well as criminalizing legitimate gun owners. The cancellation has led to conflict with some provinces, including Ontario and Quebec, who sought to retain the information from the registry.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/rcmp-boss-warns-provinces-against-backdoor-long-gun-registries|title=Ontario openly defies Vic Toews over gun registry despite new RCMP warning|access-date=April 25, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/vic-toews-sends-stern-warning-to-rcmp-over-provincial-backdoor-long-gun-registry-efforts|title=Vic Toews sends stern warning to RCMP over provincial 'backdoor' long-gun registry efforts|access-date=April 25, 2017}}</ref>

In February 2012, Bill C-30 was presented to Parliament by Harper's government. The legislation, entitled the [[Protecting Children from Internet Predators Act]] despite not having any provisions related to [[child sexual abuse]] online or otherwise, was designed to aid law enforcement's ability to track online activity. It provided provisions for the government to gather information online about citizens without a warrant, and without their ability to be aware they were under suspicion. Controversy over the warrantless privacy invasion and the poor behaviour of the minister introducing the legislation led to a public backlash over privacy concerns. Justice Minister [[Vic Toews]] did not understand details of the bill when questioned by the press, and accused anyone who opposed this bill as supporting child exploitation.<ref name="auto">{{cite news| url=https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/politics/article/1130846--vic-toews-accuses-bill-s-opponents-of-siding-with-child-pornographers | location=Toronto | work=The Star | title=Vic Toews accuses bill's opponents of siding with child pornographers | date=February 13, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/story/2012/02/13/technology-lawful-access-toews-pornographers.html |work=CBC News |title=Online surveillance critics accused of supporting child porn |date=February 13, 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120513063703/http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/story/2012/02/13/technology-lawful-access-toews-pornographers.html |archive-date=May 13, 2012 }}</ref> This led the government to send this legislation directly to committee for review,<ref>{{cite web
|title = Police officials support Bill C-30, civil liberties group disagree
|url = https://theprovince.com/news/Police+officials+support+Bill+civil+liberties+group+disagree/6180736/story.html
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120222133009/http://www.theprovince.com/news/Police+officials+support+Bill+civil+liberties+group+disagree/6180736/story.html
|url-status=dead
|archive-date = February 22, 2012
|work = The Province
|date = February 20, 2012
|author = Frank Luba
|df = mdy-all
}}</ref> and possible termination.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/matt-gurney-on-lawful-access-tories-abandon-a-good-idea-gone-horribly-wrong|title=Matt Gurney on lawful access: Tories abandon a good idea gone horribly wrong|access-date=April 25, 2017}}</ref>

In February 2012, the [[2011 Canadian federal election voter suppression scandal|Robocall scandal]] emerged regarding attempts at voter suppression targeting non-Conservative voters in 200 ridings during the 2011 election.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://ottawacitizen.com/news/More+than+dozen+ridings+blitzed+harassing+fake+Liberal+phone+calls+2011+election/6207261/story.html |work=Ottawa Citizen |title=More than a dozen ridings blitzed by harassing fake Liberal phone calls in 2011 election |author=Stephen Maher |author2=Glen McGregor |date=March 2, 2012 }}{{dead link|date=December 2016 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> The [[Royal Canadian Mounted Police]] and [[Elections Canada]] investigated the calls<ref>{{cite web|url=https://ottawacitizen.com/news/Elections+Canada+investigating+robocalls+that+misled+voters/6194990/story.html |title=Elections Canada investigating 'robocalls' that misled voters |work=Ottawa Citizen |date=February 27, 2012 |author=Stephen Maher |author2=Glen McGregor }}{{dead link|date=December 2016 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> but ultimately did not refer the matter to the [[Public Prosecution Service of Canada|Director of Public Prosecutions]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elections.ca/content.aspx?section=com&document=apr2414&dir=pre-com&lang=e#top|title=Commissioner of Canada Elections Issues Report on Deceptive Communications Investigation|publisher=Elections Canada|date=April 24, 2014|access-date=May 14, 2014}}</ref> [[Michael Sona]] (a Conservative campaign worker in the riding of [[Guelph (electoral district)|Guelph]]) was later found guilty of one count of willfully preventing or endeavoring to prevent an elector from voting in an election, an offence under the [[Canada Elections Act]], and sentenced to nine months in prison.<ref>{{cite news |title=Michael Sona gets nine months in jail for his role in 2011 robocalls scandal |first=Glen |last=McGregor |url=http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/11/19/michael-sona-gets-nine-months-in-jail-for-his-role-in-2011-robocalls-scandal/ |journal=[[National Post]] |date= November 19, 2014}}</ref>


==Popular support==
==Popular support==
The Conservatives won 124 (or 40.3% of the total) seats in the [[House of Commons of Canada]] in the 2006 election while receiving 36.3% of the [[Direct election|popular vote]], and won 143 seats (or 46.4% of the total) in the 2008 election while receiving 37.7% of the popular vote. In the 2011 election, the Conservatives won 166 seats (54% of the total) with 39.6% of the popular vote.
The Conservatives won 124 (or 40.3% of the total) seats in the [[House of Commons of Canada]] in the 2006 election while receiving 36.3% of the [[Direct election|popular vote]], and won 143 seats (or 46.4% of the total) in the 2008 election while receiving 37.7% of the popular vote. In the 2011 election, the Conservatives won 166 seats (54% of the total) with 39.6% of the popular vote.


Conventional wisdom before the 2011 election held that winning a federal majority without significant support in the province of Quebec would be nearly impossible.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorialopinion/article/991386--persichilli-harper-and-mcguinty-called-quebec-s-bluff |location=Toronto |work=The Star |first=Angelo |last=Persichilli |title=Harper and McGuinty called Quebec's bluff |date=May 15, 2011}}</ref> The Conservatives disproved this by winning an eleven-seat majority with only five seats in Quebec. The Conservatives won considerably more popular support outside of Quebec than they did elsewhere, carrying 48% of the popular vote outside of Quebec. This was only the second time in Canadian history that a federal government was formed without a substantial number of seats from Quebec.
Conventional wisdom before the 2011 election previously held that winning a federal majority without significant support in the province of Quebec would be near impossible.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.thestar.com/opinion/persichilli-harper-and-mcguinty-called-quebec-s-bluff/article_f0b5bcfa-bcd2-56ef-9e0d-d833d7156f06.html |location=Toronto |work=The Star |first=Angelo |last=Persichilli |title=Harper and McGuinty called Quebec's bluff |date=May 15, 2011 |access-date=March 20, 2024}}</ref> The Conservatives disproved this, winning an eleven-seat majority with only five seats in Quebec. The Conservatives won considerably more popular support outside of Quebec than they did elsewhere, carrying 48% of the popular vote outside of Quebec. This was only the second time in Canadian history that a federal government was formed without a substantial number of seats from Quebec.


Media speculation had been that the Conservatives would need to win in excess of 40% of the popular vote to form a [[majority government]], the stated goal of Harper in the [[2011 Canadian federal election|2011 election]]. However, the Liberal Party was able to win a majority with only 38.5% of the popular vote in [[1997 Canadian federal election|1997]] and the Conservatives have previously come very close to a majority with 37.7% of the popular vote (12 seats short) in 2008 and with 35.9% of the vote (6 seats short) in 1979.
Media speculation was the Conservatives would need to win in excess of 40% of the popular vote to form a [[majority government]], the stated goal of Harper in the [[2011 Canadian federal election|2011 election]]. However, the Liberal Party was able to win a majority with only 38.5% of the popular vote in [[1997 Canadian federal election|1997]]. The Conservatives have previously come very close to a majority with 37.7% of the popular vote (12 seats short) in 2008 and with 35.9% of the vote (6 seats short) in 1979.


Harper led the government through the longest lasting federal minority government in Canadian history, which ended when he achieved a majority victory in 2011.
Harper led the government through the longest lasting federal minority government in Canadian history, which ended when he achieved a majority victory in 2011.
Line 86: Line 50:
===Opinion polling between the 2008 and 2011 federal elections===
===Opinion polling between the 2008 and 2011 federal elections===
{{main|Opinion polling for the 2011 Canadian federal election}}
{{main|Opinion polling for the 2011 Canadian federal election}}
The Conservatives led in every public opinion poll released from March 2010 until the election. From January to September 2009 and again from January to February 2010 several polls showed the Liberals tied with or slightly leading Harper's Conservatives.
The Conservatives led in every public opinion poll released from March 2010 to the election. From January to September 2009 and again from January to February 2010 several polls showed the Liberals tied with or slightly leading Harper's Conservatives.


===Opinion polling after the 2011 federal election===
===Opinion polling after the 2011 federal election===
{{Main|Opinion polling for the 2015 Canadian federal election}}
{{Main|Opinion polling for the 2015 Canadian federal election}}
The Conservatives continued to maintain 37–39% support after the election. In March 2012, some polls showed the NDP tied with or surpassing the Conservatives and others show the Conservatives with a slim lead.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ctvnews.ca/mulcair-targets-tories-as-ndp-poll-numbers-surge-1.796511|title=Mulcair targets Tories as NDP poll numbers surge|first=John|last=Size|date=April 15, 2012|access-date=April 25, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/conservative-popularity-sinks-but-stephen-harper-approval-holds-steady-poll|title=Conservative popularity sinks but Stephen Harper approval holds steady: poll|access-date=April 25, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ipsos-na.com/news-polls/pressrelease.aspx?id=5584 |title=Ipsos Nation Poll |access-date=April 17, 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120419040737/http://www.ipsos-na.com/news-polls/pressrelease.aspx?id=5584 |archive-date=April 19, 2012 |df=dmy }}</ref> In May 2012, the Tories dipped into second place behind the NDP,<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ndp-broadens-support-into-tory-turf-poll-shows/article2428433/ | location=Toronto | work=The Globe and Mail | title=Search | date=June 18, 2012}}</ref> but the NDP quickly dropped again. In April 2013, the Conservatives dropped in second place in the polls behind the Liberals and their new leader [[Justin Trudeau]]. The Liberals would keep their lead until 2015. Upon the beginning of the election campaign in summer 2015, the three main federal parties were neck and neck with about 30% each in most polls. The Liberals ended up edging out the other parties during the campaign, and won the [[2015 Canadian federal election]].
The Conservatives continued to maintain 37–39% support after the election. In March 2012, some polls showed the NDP tied with or surpassing the Conservatives and others show the Conservatives with a slim lead.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ctvnews.ca/mulcair-targets-tories-as-ndp-poll-numbers-surge-1.796511|title=Mulcair targets Tories as NDP poll numbers surge|first=John|last=Size|date=April 15, 2012|access-date=April 25, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/conservative-popularity-sinks-but-stephen-harper-approval-holds-steady-poll|title=Conservative popularity sinks but Stephen Harper approval holds steady: poll|access-date=March 20, 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ipsos-na.com/news-polls/pressrelease.aspx?id=5584 |title=Ipsos Nation Poll |access-date=April 17, 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120419040737/http://www.ipsos-na.com/news-polls/pressrelease.aspx?id=5584 |archive-date=April 19, 2012 |df=dmy }}</ref> In May 2012, the Tories dipped into second place behind the NDP,<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ndp-broadens-support-into-tory-turf-poll-shows/article2428433/ | location=Toronto | work=The Globe and Mail | title=Search | date=June 18, 2012}}</ref> but the NDP quickly dropped again. In April 2013, the Conservatives dropped in second place in the polls behind the Liberals and their new leader [[Justin Trudeau]]. The Liberals would keep their lead until 2015. Upon the beginning of the election campaign in summer 2015, the three main federal parties were neck and neck with about 30% each in most polls.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Murphy |first=Jessica |date=2015-08-07 |title=Tom Mulcair and Canada's New Democrat party lead push for change |language=en-GB |work=The Guardian |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/aug/07/tom-mulcair-and-canadas-progressive-democrats-lead-push-for-change |access-date=2023-09-19 |issn=0261-3077}}</ref> The Liberals ended up edging out the other parties during the campaign, and won the [[2015 Canadian federal election]].


==Relationship with parliament, opposition parties==
==Relationship with parliament, opposition parties==
Line 100: Line 64:
====Non-confidence motion and prorogation of Parliament, 2008====
====Non-confidence motion and prorogation of Parliament, 2008====
{{main|2008–2009 Canadian parliamentary dispute}}
{{main|2008–2009 Canadian parliamentary dispute}}
Harper precipitated a national controversy, which threatened to overturn his government, by fielding a spending bill in the fall of 2008 which would have stripped taxpayer funding from political parties and taken away<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=8f7fcd62-f516-4da6-a511-8d6e4f80e281|title=canada.com - Page Not Found|access-date=April 25, 2017|via=Canada.com|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121109010323/http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=8f7fcd62-f516-4da6-a511-8d6e4f80e281|archive-date=November 9, 2012|df=mdy-all}}</ref> the [[right to strike]] from Canadian public service workers as purported solutions to the effects in Canada of the [[Late-2000s recession|global economic crisis]]. Outraged opposition parties formed a coalition, intending to call a vote of non-confidence that would have toppled the Harper government, but he avoided the impending vote of non-confidence by asking the Governor General to [[Prorogation in Canada|prorogue]] Parliament until January 26, 2009. Following the resumption of parliament, Harper introduced a new budget which was allowed to pass when members of the Liberal caucus abstained from the vote.
Harper precipitated a national controversy, which threatened to overturn his government, by fielding a spending bill in the fall of 2008 which would have stripped taxpayer funding from political parties and taken away<ref>{{cite web |date=28 November 2008 |title=Strike ban proposal 'atrocious,' unions say |url=http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=8f7fcd62-f516-4da6-a511-8d6e4f80e281 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121109010323/http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=8f7fcd62-f516-4da6-a511-8d6e4f80e281 |archive-date=9 November 2012 |access-date=April 25, 2017 |website=Canada.com}}</ref> the [[right to strike]] from Canadian public service workers as purported solutions to the effects in Canada of the [[Late-2000s recession|global economic crisis]]. Outraged opposition parties formed a coalition intending to call a vote of non-confidence that would have toppled the Harper government, but he avoided the impending vote of non-confidence by asking the Governor General to [[Prorogation in Canada|prorogue]] Parliament until January 26, 2009. Following the resumption of parliament, Harper introduced a new budget which was allowed to pass when members of the Liberal caucus abstained from the vote.


===Senate appointments===
===Senate appointments===
As prime minister, Harper recommended the appointment of 38 persons to the [[Senate of Canada]]. All of these senators were members of Harper's Conservative Party. Three ([[Michael Fortier]], [[Fabian Manning]], and [[Larry Smith (Canadian politician)|Larry Smith]]) subsequently resigned from the Senate to seek election to the House of Commons.
As prime minister, Harper recommended the appointment of 38 persons to the [[Senate of Canada]]. All of these senators were members of Harper's Conservative Party. Three ([[Michael Fortier]], [[Fabian Manning]], and [[Larry Smith (Canadian politician)|Larry Smith]]) subsequently resigned from the Senate to seek election to the House of Commons.


Harper had long been an advocate of an elected Senate and appointed four senators ([[Bert Brown]], [[Betty Unger]], [[Doug Black]], and [[Scott Tannas]]) based on the result of [[Alberta Senate nominee elections]]. Harper introduced legislation to provide for elections to advise the prime minister on whom to recommend for appointment to the Senate and to cause appointed senators to serve fixed terms, to, in essence, create a [[de facto]] elected Senate without changing the constitution.{{citation needed|date=March 2017}} Harper's Senate appointments and reform proposals were criticized for failing to address the balance of seats among provinces, possibly being unconstitutional, and for running contrary to the spirit of his previous pledges for an elected senate. Harper argued that, without appointing senators, the Liberals would have continued to enjoy a majority in the senate despite lacking popular support, the senate would become less and less able to function, and all of his appointees agreed to resign and seek election to the senate should his reform proposals pass.<ref>{{cite news |author=Richard J. Brennan |date=August 27, 2009 |url=https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/687216 |title=Harper appoints 9 to Senate |work=Toronto Star |access-date=April 26, 2011}}</ref>
Harper had long been an advocate of an elected Senate and appointed four senators ([[Bert Brown]], [[Betty Unger]], [[Doug Black]], and [[Scott Tannas]]) based on the result of [[Alberta Senate nominee elections]]. Harper introduced legislation to provide for elections to advise the prime minister on whom to recommend for appointment to the Senate and to cause appointed senators to serve fixed terms, to, in essence, create a [[de facto]] elected Senate without changing the constitution.{{citation needed|date=March 2017}} Harper's Senate appointments and reform proposals were criticized for failing to address the balance of seats among provinces, possibly being unconstitutional, and for running contrary to the spirit of his previous pledges for an elected senate. Harper argued that, without appointing senators, the Liberals would have continued to enjoy a majority in the senate despite lacking popular support, the senate would become less and less able to function, and all of his appointees agreed to resign and seek election to the senate should his reform proposals pass.<ref>{{cite news |author=Richard J. Brennan |date=August 27, 2009 |url=https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/harper-appoints-9-to-senate/article_2bd7284a-9073-589e-9d77-6a040a2b6267.html |title=Harper appoints 9 to Senate |work=Toronto Star |access-date=March 20, 2024}}</ref>


===Libel suit against Liberal Party===
===Libel suit against Liberal Party===
Harper launched a lawsuit on March 13, 2008, against the [[Liberal Party of Canada]] over statements published on the party's website concerning the [[Chuck Cadman#2005 Budget vote and bribery allegations|Chuck Cadman]] affair. This was the first time a sitting prime minister had sued the opposition for libel. The $2.5-million suit named the Liberal Party, the Federal Liberal Agency of Canada, and the unnamed author or authors of the statements published on the Liberal website. The articles at the centre of the lawsuit were headlined "Harper knew of Conservative bribery"<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.liberal.ca/story_13642_e.aspx |title=Harper Knew of Conservative Bribery |access-date=2016-02-22 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090201153055/http://www.liberal.ca/story_13642_e.aspx |archive-date=February 1, 2009 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> and "Harper must come clean about allegations of Conservative Bribery".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.liberal.ca/story_13635_e.aspx |title=Harper Must Come Clean About Allegations of Conservative Bribery, Liberals say |access-date=2016-02-22 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090201153047/http://www.liberal.ca/story_13635_e.aspx |archive-date=February 1, 2009 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> Those articles questioned Harper's alleged involvement in financial offers made to Cadman to sway his vote in a crucial 2005 Commons showdown. The suit filed in the [[Ontario Superior Court of Justice]] did not name Liberal Leader [[Stéphane Dion]] or MPs [[Ralph Goodale]] and [[Michael Ignatieff]]—whom Harper also threatened to sue.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5hWO1n_uKv1ZkQkkH9xh-ZpouAj2w |title=Harper files libel suit against Liberals over Cadman statements |publisher=The Canadian Press |access-date=March 13, 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080315032157/http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5hWO1n_uKv1ZkQkkH9xh-ZpouAj2w |archive-date=March 15, 2008 }}</ref> The lawsuit was settled out of court in 2009 with both parties not disclosing the terms of settlement.<ref>{{cite web |last=Authier |first=NIcolas |url=https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/story.html?id=1262217 |publisher=National post |title=Harper, Liberals settle Cadman lawsuit |access-date=July 14, 2012}}</ref>
Harper launched a lawsuit on March 13, 2008, against the [[Liberal Party of Canada]] over statements published on the party's website concerning the [[Chuck Cadman#2005 Budget vote and bribery allegations|Chuck Cadman]] affair. This was the first time a sitting prime minister had sued the opposition for libel. The $2.5-million suit named "The Liberal Party, the Federal Liberal Agency of Canada, and the unnamed author or authors of the statements published on the Liberal website". The articles at the centre of the lawsuit were headlined "Harper knew of Conservative bribery"<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.liberal.ca/story_13642_e.aspx |title=Harper Knew of Conservative Bribery |access-date=2016-02-22 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090201153055/http://www.liberal.ca/story_13642_e.aspx |archive-date=February 1, 2009 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> and "Harper must come clean about allegations of Conservative Bribery".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.liberal.ca/story_13635_e.aspx |title=Harper Must Come Clean About Allegations of Conservative Bribery, Liberals say |access-date=2016-02-22 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090201153047/http://www.liberal.ca/story_13635_e.aspx |archive-date=February 1, 2009 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> Those articles questioned Harper's alleged involvement in financial offers made to Cadman to sway his vote in a crucial 2005 Commons showdown. The suit filed in the [[Ontario Superior Court of Justice]] did not name Liberal Leader [[Stéphane Dion]] or MPs [[Ralph Goodale]] and [[Michael Ignatieff]]—whom Harper had also threatened to sue.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5hWO1n_uKv1ZkQkkH9xh-ZpouAj2w |title=Harper files libel suit against Liberals over Cadman statements |publisher=The Canadian Press |access-date=March 13, 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080315032157/http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5hWO1n_uKv1ZkQkkH9xh-ZpouAj2w |archive-date=March 15, 2008 }}</ref> The lawsuit was settled out of court in 2009 with both parties not disclosing the terms of settlement.<ref>{{cite web |last=Authier |first=Nicolas |url=https://nationalpost.com/news/harper-liberals-settle-cadman-lawsuit |publisher=National post |title=Harper, Liberals settle Cadman lawsuit |access-date=March 20, 2024}}</ref>


[[Dona Cadman]] said that prior to the May 2005 budget vote, [[Tom Flanagan (political scientist)|Tom Flanagan]] and Doug Finley, two [[Conservative Party of Canada|Conservative Party]] officials, offered her husband, Chuck Cadman, a million-dollar life insurance policy in exchange for his vote to bring down the Liberal government.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080227.wcadmann0227/BNStory/National/home |title=Tories tried to sway vote of dying MP, widow alleges |work=The Globe and Mail |access-date=February 27, 2008 |author=Gloria Galloway |author2=Brian Laghi |location=Toronto |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080302105906/http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080227.wcadmann0227/BNStory/National/home |archive-date=March 2, 2008 }}</ref>
[[Dona Cadman]] said that prior to the May 2005 budget vote, [[Tom Flanagan (political scientist)|Tom Flanagan]] and Doug Finley, two [[Conservative Party of Canada|Conservative Party]] officials, offered her husband, Chuck Cadman, a million-dollar life insurance policy in exchange for his vote to bring down the Liberal government.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080227.wcadmann0227/BNStory/National/home |title=Tories tried to sway vote of dying MP, widow alleges |work=The Globe and Mail |access-date=February 27, 2008 |author=Gloria Galloway |author2=Brian Laghi |location=Toronto |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080302105906/http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080227.wcadmann0227/BNStory/National/home |archive-date=March 2, 2008 }}</ref>
Line 114: Line 78:
==Domestic and foreign policy==
==Domestic and foreign policy==
[[File:Obama, Peña y Harper. IX Cumbre de Líderes de América del Norte.jpg|thumb|Harper, Mexican President [[Enrique Peña Nieto|Peña Nieto]], and U.S. President [[Barack Obama]] at the 2014 [[North American Leaders' Summit]] ]]
[[File:Obama, Peña y Harper. IX Cumbre de Líderes de América del Norte.jpg|thumb|Harper, Mexican President [[Enrique Peña Nieto|Peña Nieto]], and U.S. President [[Barack Obama]] at the 2014 [[North American Leaders' Summit]] ]]
{{main|Domestic policy of the Stephen Harper government|Foreign policy of the Stephen Harper government|Economic policy of the Stephen Harper government|Environmental policy of the Stephen Harper government}}
{{main|Domestic policy of the Stephen Harper government|Foreign policy of the Stephen Harper government|Environmental policy of the Stephen Harper government}}
Harper's government introduced 9 budgets. The [[2011 Canadian federal budget|2011 budget]] was not passed prior to the calling of the [[2011 Canadian federal election|2011 general election]], but was adopted soon afterward. Starting in 2008, each of his budgets ran a substantial deficit as a result of the 2008 global recession. Budgetary equilibrium returned in 2013, earlier than it was originally predicted. [[Economic policy of the Stephen Harper government|Harper's economic policy]] included a multitude of new spending and reduced government revenue revenues due to reductions to the [[Goods and Services Tax (Canada)|Goods and Services Tax]] and corporate income taxes. Harper campaigned on a pledge to increase defense spending and has cut it in real terms.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/the-harper-government-loves-the-military-in-theory/article19355276/ |title=The Harper government loves the military – in theory |last1=Simpson |first1=Jeffrey |date=June 28, 2014 |website=www.theglobeandmail.com |publisher=The Globe and Mail |access-date=June 28, 2014}}</ref>
Harper's government introduced 9 budgets. The [[2011 Canadian federal budget|2011 budget]] was not passed prior to the calling of the [[2011 Canadian federal election|2011 general election]], but was adopted soon afterward. Starting in 2008, each of his budgets ran a substantial deficit as a result of the 2008 global recession.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Dodge |first=David |date=October 19, 2016 |first2=Richard |last2=Dion |title=Economic performance and policy during the Harper years |url=https://policyoptions.irpp.org/magazines/october-2016/economic-performance-and-policy-during-the-harper-years/ |access-date=2023-09-19 |website=Policy Options |language=en}}</ref> Budgetary equilibrium returned in 2013, earlier than it was originally predicted. [[Economic policy of the Stephen Harper government|Harper's economic policy]] included a multitude of new spending and reduced government revenue revenues due to reductions to the [[Goods and Services Tax (Canada)|Goods and Services Tax]] and corporate income taxes. Harper campaigned on a pledge to increase defense spending and has cut it in real terms.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/the-harper-government-loves-the-military-in-theory/article19355276/ |title=The Harper government loves the military – in theory |last1=Simpson |first1=Jeffrey |date=June 28, 2014 |website=www.theglobeandmail.com |publisher=The Globe and Mail |access-date=June 28, 2014}}</ref>


As with any Canadian government, the principal foreign relations issue is [[Canada–United States relations|the relationship with the United States]], Canada's closest neighbour and largest trading partner. The ongoing [[War in Afghanistan (2001–present)|War in Afghanistan]] was also a major foreign policy issue for the Harper government, who withdrew Canadian troops from Afghanistan in 2011. As a result of economic sanctions against officials of the [[Russia]]n government stemming from the [[annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation]], Harper had to contend with a sharp reduction in trade with Russia.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-s-trade-relationship-with-russia-1.2731103|title=Canada's trade relationship with Russia|access-date=April 25, 2017}}</ref>
As with any Canadian government, the principal foreign relations issue is [[Canada–United States relations|the relationship with the United States]], Canada's closest neighbour and largest trading partner. The ongoing [[War in Afghanistan (2001–present)|War in Afghanistan]] was also a major foreign policy issue for the Harper government, who withdrew Canadian troops from Afghanistan in 2011. As a result of economic sanctions against officials of the [[Russia]]n government stemming from the [[annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation]], Harper had to contend with a sharp reduction in trade with Russia.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-s-trade-relationship-with-russia-1.2731103|title=Canada's trade relationship with Russia|access-date=April 25, 2017}}</ref>

==Scandals==

Harper's Conservatives gained criticism for improper election spending during the [[2006 Canadian federal election|2006 federal election]] The scandal was known as the [[In and Out scandal]]. Parliamentary hearings into the issue led to a deadlocking of various committees, and then to the [[2008 Canadian federal election|snap election in 2008]]. On 6 March 2012, charges were dropped as part of a plea deal in which the Conservative Party of Canada and its fundraising arm pleaded guilty to exceeding election spending limits and submitting fraudulent election records, and agreed to repay $230,198.00 for its role in violating Canadian election spending laws.<ref name="The National Post">{{Cite news|url=https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/conservatives-drop-appeal-of-in-and-out-ruling |title=Conservatives drop appeal of 'in-and-out' ruling |publisher=[[The National Post]] |date=2012-03-06 |access-date=March 20, 2024}}</ref>

In February 2012, the [[2011 Canadian federal election voter suppression scandal|Robocall scandal]] emerged regarding attempts at voter suppression targeting non-Conservative voters in 200 ridings during the 2011 election.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://ottawacitizen.com/news/More+than+dozen+ridings+blitzed+harassing+fake+Liberal+phone+calls+2011+election/6207261/story.html |work=Ottawa Citizen |title=More than a dozen ridings blitzed by harassing fake Liberal phone calls in 2011 election |author=Stephen Maher |author2=Glen McGregor |date=March 2, 2012 }}{{dead link|date=December 2016 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> The [[Royal Canadian Mounted Police]] and [[Elections Canada]] investigated the calls<ref>{{cite web|url=https://ottawacitizen.com/news/Elections+Canada+investigating+robocalls+that+misled+voters/6194990/story.html |title=Elections Canada investigating 'robocalls' that misled voters |work=Ottawa Citizen |date=February 27, 2012 |author=Stephen Maher |author2=Glen McGregor }}{{dead link|date=December 2016 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> but ultimately did not refer the matter to the [[Public Prosecution Service of Canada|Director of Public Prosecutions]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elections.ca/content.aspx?section=com&document=apr2414&dir=pre-com&lang=e#top|title=Commissioner of Canada Elections Issues Report on Deceptive Communications Investigation|publisher=Elections Canada|date=April 24, 2014|access-date=May 14, 2014}}</ref> [[Michael Sona]] (a Conservative campaign worker in the riding of [[Guelph (federal electoral district)|Guelph]]) was later found guilty of one count of willfully preventing or endeavoring to prevent an elector from voting in an election, an offence under the [[Canada Elections Act]], and sentenced to nine months in prison.<ref>{{cite news |title=Michael Sona gets nine months in jail for his role in 2011 robocalls scandal |first=Glen |last=McGregor |url=https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/michael-sona-gets-nine-months-in-jail-for-his-role-in-2011-robocalls-scandal |newspaper=[[National Post]] |date= November 19, 2014 |access-date=March 20, 2024}}</ref>


==Cabinet==
==Cabinet==
{{main|28th Canadian Ministry}}
{{main|28th Canadian Ministry}}
Although the majority of Conservative seats were from the Western provinces, the majority of names which Harper put forward to the [[Governor General of Canada|Governor General]] for appointment as Cabinet Ministers were from Ontario and Quebec, in the interests of regional balance. The new Conservative Cabinet was substantially smaller than the prior Martin government because it initially did away with junior ministers (known as [[Minister of State (Canada)|Ministers of State]], and previously Secretaries of State). Several pundits in the media described Harper's Cabinet as moderate, and a tempering of the Conservative Party's roots in the Canadian Alliance and Reform.{{who|date=September 2015}}
Although the majority of Conservative seats were from the Western provinces, the majority of names which Harper put forward to the [[Governor General of Canada|Governor General]] for appointment as Cabinet Ministers were from Ontario and Quebec, in the interests of regional balance. The new Conservative Cabinet was substantially smaller than the prior Martin government because it initially did away with junior ministers (known as [[Minister of State (Canada)|Ministers of State]], and previously Secretaries of State). Several pundits in the media described Harper's Cabinet as moderate, and a tempering of the Conservative Party's roots in the Canadian Alliance and Reform.{{who|date=September 2015}}

In selecting his cabinet Harper chose outgoing Liberal [[Minister of Industry (Canada)|Minister of Industry]] [[David Emerson]] as [[Minister of International Trade (Canada)|Minister of International Trade]] and Minister for the Pacific Gateway and the [[2010 Winter Olympics]], and [[Michael Fortier]], a senior Conservative Party operative and campaign strategist, as [[Minister of Public Works and Government Services (Canada)|Minister of Public Works]], and as an appointee to the [[Senate of Canada|Senate]]. Emerson had been re-elected to parliament as a Liberal only weeks earlier, while Fortier did not contest the previous election at all. Harper argued that the appointments were necessary to provide two of Canada's largest cities ([[Vancouver]] and [[Montreal]]) with Cabinet representation, as the Conservatives did not win seats in these cities. Critics countered that no such concessions were made for Canada's largest city, [[Toronto]], where the conservatives also failed to win a seat, but proponents of the Prime Minister contested that MP and Finance Minister [[Jim Flaherty]], representing the nearby city of [[Whitby, Ontario|Whitby]], would represent Torontonians in Cabinet.

Opposition politicians and other critics attacked the appointment of Emerson as hypocritical, as several members of the Conservative Party had criticized former Conservative MP [[Belinda Stronach]] for crossing the floor to the Liberals and receiving a Cabinet appointment in 2005, shortly before a critical budgetary vote that amounted to a confidence motion for the then-ruling Liberal party. Emerson's decision was also met with opposition in his riding, where the Conservative candidate had received less than 20% of the vote in the previous campaign, although Emerson himself was re-elected by a large margin over the NDP runner-up. The Harper government defended Emerson's appointment as tapping a politician with previous federal Cabinet experience. Emerson himself suggested that it would help the Conservatives move to the middle of the political spectrum.<ref>{{cite news |first=Jim |last=McCrae |url=http://www.brandonsun.com/story.php?story_id=18921 |title=Tories left with lots of lemons to squeeze |work=Brandon Sun |date=February 19, 2006 |access-date=April 4, 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060309123436/http://www.brandonsun.com/story.php?story_id=18921 |archive-date=March 9, 2006}}</ref>

Harper's recommendation of Fortier for appointment was also controversial, as the Conservatives had previously criticized the unelected nature of the [[Senate of Canada|Senate]]. Both Harper and Fortier have stated that the Senate appointment is temporary, and that Fortier will vacate his position at the next federal election to run for a seat in the House of Commons.

Other choices were met with greater support. Former Toronto mayor [[David Miller (mayor of Toronto)|David Miller]] called Harper's selection of [[Lawrence Cannon]] as an appointee to Cabinet as a "very positive step" and "a signal Mr. Harper's serious about reaching out to cities".<ref>{{cite news |first=Anne |last=Mroczkowski |url=http://www.pulse24.com/News/Top_Story/20060206-006/page.asp |title=Positive Start |publisher=CityNews |date=February 6, 2006 |access-date=April 4, 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060209032110/http://www.pulse24.com/News/Top_Story/20060206-006/page.asp |archive-date=February 9, 2006}}</ref> Harper recommended the appointment of [[Jim Flaherty]] as an elected MP to represent the city along with the [[Greater Toronto Area]] (GTA). Flaherty represented the riding of [[Whitby—Oshawa]], in the [[Regional Municipality of Durham, Ontario|Durham Region]] of the eastern GTA, and his selection as [[Minister of Finance]] was viewed positively by the [[Bay Street]] business community.<ref>{{cite news |first=Paul |last=Vieira |url=http://www.anticorruption.ca/forum/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=2574& |title=Bay Street likes economic ministers |publisher=National Post |date=February 7, 2006 |access-date=April 4, 2006}}</ref>

On March 3, 2006, [[Ethics Commissioner (Canada)|Ethics Commissioner]] [[Bernard Shapiro]] announced that he was launching a preliminary inquiry into conflict-of-interest allegations against Emerson and Harper. Shapiro said that he would look into what influence may have been wielded in the decision by Emerson to cross the floor.<ref>{{cite news |publisher=CTV.ca News |url=http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060301/emerson_election_060303/20060303?hub=TopStories |title=Harper to be investigated by ethics commissioner |date=March 3, 2006 |access-date=April 4, 2006 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070820063514/http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060301/emerson_election_060303/20060303?hub=TopStories |archive-date=August 20, 2007 |df=dmy }}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2006/03/03/emerson_060303.html |title=Harper 'loath' to co-operate with ethics commissioner |publisher=CBC News |date=March 3, 2006 |access-date=April 4, 2006 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070203082547/http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2006/03/03/emerson_060303.html |archive-date=February 3, 2007 }}</ref> Conservatives criticized Shapiro's probe as partisan and accused him of applying a double standard since he was appointed on the advice of the former Liberal prime minister, and had turned down earlier requests in 2005 to investigate Stronach's floor-crossing in which she received a Cabinet post, as well as a questionable land sale by Hamilton area Liberal MP [[Tony Valeri]].<ref>{{cite news |title=It's a political issue, not an ethical one |work=Globe and Mail |page=A22 |date=March 4, 2006 }}</ref> Shapiro was also criticized by former NDP leader [[Ed Broadbent]] for "extraordinarily serious credibility problems".<ref>{{cite news |agency=Canadian Press |url=https://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1141383321201&call_pageid=968332188492 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070929111632/http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar%2FLayout%2FArticle_Type1&c=Article&cid=1141383321201&call_pageid=968332188492 |url-status=dead |archive-date=September 29, 2007 |title=Ethics czar to probe Emerson defection |work=Toronto Star |date=March 3, 2006 |access-date=April 4, 2006 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> While agreeing with Harper that Shapiro's investigation was inappropriate, Broadbent and opposition MPs criticized Harper for refusing to cooperate with the Commissioner.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060308/broadbent_shapiro_060308?s_name=&no_ads= |title=Broadbent blasts tactics to remove ethics czar |publisher=CTV News |date=March 9, 2006 }}{{dead link|date=July 2021|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref>

Shapiro concluded that a minister crossing the floor to take a Cabinet position would only have been inappropriate if said Cabinet position was offered in return for some action in Parliament, such as preventing the government from falling on a confidence vote. Emerson's appointment did not fall under those conditions and Shapiro cleared both Harper and Emerson of any wrongdoing on March 20, 2006.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060320/emerson_ethics_060320?s_name=&no_ads= |title=Tories willing to allow vote on floor-crossing |publisher=CTV News |date=March 20, 2006 }}{{dead link|date=July 2021|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> However, Shapiro declined to launch any investigation into Belinda Stronach's floor-crossing,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060330/ethics_stronach_060330/20060330?hub=Canada |title=Shapiro refuses to probe Stronach defection |publisher=CTV News |date=March 30, 2006 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060814001406/http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060330/ethics_stronach_060330/20060330?hub=Canada |archive-date=August 14, 2006 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> even though it was done for exactly the reason that Shapiro claimed would be inappropriate.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/americas/05/17/canada.ap/index.html |title=Canada's ruling party gets boost |publisher=[[CNN]] |date=May 17, 2005 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060428060658/http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/americas/05/17/canada.ap/index.html |archive-date=April 28, 2006 }}</ref>


===Deputy Prime Minister and succession===
===Deputy Prime Minister and succession===
Unlike his recent predecessors, Harper did not name one of his colleagues to the largely honorific post of [[Deputy Prime Minister of Canada|deputy prime minister]]. Harper did, however, name an order of succession to act on his behalf in certain circumstances, starting with Cannon, then [[Jim Prentice]], then the balance of his cabinet in [[Canadian order of precedence|order of precedence]].
Unlike his recent predecessors, Harper did not name one of his colleagues to the largely honorific post of [[Deputy Prime Minister of Canada|Deputy Prime Minister]]. Harper did, however, name an order of succession to act on his behalf in certain circumstances, starting with Cannon, then [[Jim Prentice]], then the balance of his cabinet in [[Canadian order of precedence|order of precedence]].


==Media relations==
==Media relations==
Unlike previous Prime Ministers of Canada, Harper insisted that the Prime Minister's Office had the right to choose which reporters ask questions at press conferences,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/harper-says-he-s-finished-with-ottawa-press-corps-1.591360 |work=CBC News |title=Harper says he's finished with Ottawa press corps |date=May 24, 2006 }}</ref> which, along with other steps aimed at limiting and controlling media access, created some conflict with national media.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.canada.com/globaltv/national/story.html?id=89eafbaf-ddbe-45b6-aff9-f33ec9cb20a3|title=canada.com - Page Not Found|access-date=April 25, 2017|via=Canada.com|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070430185946/http://www.canada.com/globaltv/national/story.html?id=89eafbaf-ddbe-45b6-aff9-f33ec9cb20a3|archive-date=April 30, 2007|df=mdy-all}}</ref> It was reported that the Prime Minister's Office also "often [informed] the media about Harper's trips at such short notice that [it was] impossible for Ottawa journalists to attend the events."<ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1161553809722&call_pageid=968332188492 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070929155314/http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar%2FLayout%2FArticle_Type1&c=Article&cid=1161553809722&call_pageid=968332188492 | archive-date=September 29, 2007 | location=Toronto | work=The Star | url-status=dead | df=mdy-all }}</ref>
Unlike previous Prime Ministers of Canada, Harper insisted that the Prime Minister's Office had the right to choose which reporters ask questions at press conferences,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/harper-says-he-s-finished-with-ottawa-press-corps-1.591360 |work=CBC News |title=Harper says he's finished with Ottawa press corps |date=May 24, 2006 }}</ref> which, along with other steps aimed at limiting and controlling media access, created conflict with national media.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.canada.com/globaltv/national/story.html?id=89eafbaf-ddbe-45b6-aff9-f33ec9cb20a3|title=canada.com - Page Not Found|access-date=April 25, 2017|via=Canada.com|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070430185946/http://www.canada.com/globaltv/national/story.html?id=89eafbaf-ddbe-45b6-aff9-f33ec9cb20a3|archive-date=April 30, 2007|df=mdy-all}}</ref> It was reported that the Prime Minister's Office also "often [informed] the media about Harper's trips at such short notice that [it was] impossible for Ottawa journalists to attend the events."<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar%2FLayout%2FArticle_Type1&c=Article&cid=1161553809722&call_pageid=968332188492 |title=Archived copy |access-date=September 20, 2017 |archive-date=September 29, 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070929155314/http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar%2FLayout%2FArticle_Type1&c=Article&cid=1161553809722&call_pageid=968332188492 |url-status=dead }}</ref>


Before the 2011 election, the [[Canadian Association of Journalists]] wrote a letter to the [[Canadian House of Commons Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics|Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics]] strongly criticizing the Canadian government for severely restricting access to documents that should be made available to Canadian citizens.<ref>http://www.caj.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/ETHI-submission.pdf {{Bare URL PDF|date=March 2022}}</ref> The CAJ stated, "Open government is not revolutionary and the government of Canada is behind compared to other nations and even some provinces."{{citation needed|date=September 2021}}
Before the 2011 election, the [[Canadian Association of Journalists]] wrote a letter to the [[Canadian House of Commons Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics|Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics]] strongly criticizing the Canadian government for severely restricting access to documents that should be made available to Canadian citizens.<ref>http://www.caj.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/ETHI-submission.pdf {{Bare URL PDF|date=March 2022}}</ref> The CAJ stated, "Open government is not revolutionary and the government of Canada is behind compared to other nations and even some provinces."{{citation needed|date=September 2021}}


In 2011 Stephen Harper violated [[copyright]] when he sang the song "[[Imagine (John Lennon song)|Imagine]]" without permission of the owner in a video that was later uploaded to [[YouTube]]. As a result, the video was removed by request of [[Yoko Ono]]’s publishing company.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.torontolife.com/tag/yoko-ono/|title=Yoko Ono|access-date=April 25, 2017}}</ref> Although Canada's 2012 Copyright Modernization Act permits non-profit performances of copyrighted songs like "Imagine", it is still not legal to upload recordings of such performances to the Internet.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/annualstatutes/2012_20/FullText.html|title=Consolidated federal laws of canada, Copyright Modernization Act|first=Legislative Services|last=Branch|access-date=April 25, 2017|date=March 15, 2017}}</ref>
In 2011 Stephen Harper violated [[copyright]] when he sang the song "[[Imagine (John Lennon song)|Imagine]]" without permission of the owner in a video that was later uploaded to [[YouTube]]. As a result, the video was removed by request of [[Yoko Ono]]’s publishing company.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.torontolife.com/tag/yoko-ono/|title=Yoko Ono|access-date=April 25, 2017}}</ref> Although Canada's 2012 Copyright Modernization Act permits non-profit performances of copyrighted songs like "Imagine", it is still not legal to upload recordings of such performances to the Internet.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/annualstatutes/2012_20/FullText.html|title=Consolidated federal laws of canada, Copyright Modernization Act|access-date=April 25, 2017|date=March 15, 2017}}</ref>


==="Canada's New Government" and "Harper Government"===
==="Canada's New Government" and "Harper Government"===
Line 152: Line 110:
The term ''Harperism'' was coined and used by some in the Canadian media to describe the Harper's policies and style during his premiership. The term has been used pejoratively to describe what some see as Harper's authoritarian approach to his [[28th Canadian Ministry|cabinet]] and in the prorogation of the [[40th Canadian parliament]].<ref>{{cite book|last1=Gutstein|first1=Donald|title=Harperism: How Stephen Harper and his think tank colleagues have transformed Canada|date=September 3, 2014}}</ref>
The term ''Harperism'' was coined and used by some in the Canadian media to describe the Harper's policies and style during his premiership. The term has been used pejoratively to describe what some see as Harper's authoritarian approach to his [[28th Canadian Ministry|cabinet]] and in the prorogation of the [[40th Canadian parliament]].<ref>{{cite book|last1=Gutstein|first1=Donald|title=Harperism: How Stephen Harper and his think tank colleagues have transformed Canada|date=September 3, 2014}}</ref>


==Campaign promises==
==Relationship with public service==
{{see also|Public Service of Canada}}


The federal governments of [[Justin Trudeau]] and [[Stephen Harper]] fulfilled the majority of their campaign promises and scored highest on fulfilling their campaign promises compared to any other "Canadian government over the last 35 years", according to an August 30, 2019 publication based on research at [[Laval University]]. The 237-page publication, ''Assessing Justin Trudeau’s Liberal Government. 353 promises and a mandate for change,'' includes the work of "two dozen Canadian academics". They found that Justin Trudeau's Liberal government kept 92 percent of pledges, when complete and partial pledges were added together, while the Harper government kept 85 percent of complete and partial pledges. When only completed, realized pledges were calculated, Harper's government, in their last year, kept 77 percent of promises while the Liberal government kept 53.5 percent. The book notes that Harper's pledges tended towards transactional pledges which target sub-populations while Trudeau's government's promises were transformative.<ref name="UBC_review_20190826">{{Citation|title=Review: Assessing Justin Trudeau's Liberal Government: 353 Promises and a Mandate for Change|date=August 26, 2019|url=https://www.ubcpress.ca/assessing-justin-trudeaus-liberal-government|work=Les Presses de l'Université Laval, [[Laval University Press]]|access-date=November 2, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Blatchford|first1=Andy|title=New book examines Trudeau government's record of living up to pledges|work=The Globe and Mail|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-new-book-examines-trudeau-governments-record-of-living-up-to-pledges/|access-date=October 13, 2019}}</ref><ref name="CTV_20190825">{{Cite news|last=Blatchford|first=Andy|date=August 25, 2019|title=Trudeau government's 353 pre-election promises assessed in new book|work=The Canadian Press via CTV News|url=https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/trudeau-government-s-353-pre-election-promises-assessed-in-new-book-1.4564103|access-date=November 2, 2019}}</ref>
Stephen Harper described his relationship with the public servants as tense. In 2007, he told CBC interviewer [[Rex Murphy]] "Probably the most difficult job, you know, practical difficult thing you have to learn as a prime minister and ministers, our ministers as well, is dealing with the federal bureaucracy. He added "It’s walking that fine line of, of being a positive leader of the federal public service, but at the same time pushing them and not becoming captive to them . . . I could write a book on that one".<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|last=Delacourt|first=Susan|date=2013-07-12|title=The Harper government vs. the public servants|url=https://www.thestar.com/news/insight/2013/07/12/the_harper_government_vs_the_public_servants.html|access-date=2020-07-02|website=thestar.com|language=en}}</ref>


==Supreme Court nominations==
In 2013, former director-general with [[Citizenship and Immigration Canada]] Andrew Griffith wrote that "Under the Harper government, one of the main challenges for the public service was having its knowledge and expertise put into question". Griffith noted cultural differences between the more liberal-oriented public servants and an ideologically-driven conservative governments. Griffith also said that the government's short term political agenda clashed with the public service's long-term planning.<ref name=":0" />
Harper chose the following jurists to be appointed as justices of the [[Supreme Court of Canada]] by the governor general:


* [[Marshall Rothstein]] (March 1, 2006 – August 31, 2015)
He related his experience working with the then-minister of immigration [[Jason Kenney]], who changed the working culture of his department to the dismay of most of his co-workers. Indeed, Kenney intended to use his department to build the Conservative Party's base, and his minister's office frequently intervened in the works of the department employees, requiring them to take into consideration the minister's outreach to various communities. Under previous ministers, these considerations tended to be ignored.<ref name=":0" />
* [[Thomas Cromwell (jurist)|Thomas Cromwell]] (September 5, 2008 – September 1, 2016)
* [[Andromache Karakatsanis]] (October 21, 2011–present)<ref name=SecretProcess>{{Cite news|url=https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/supreme-court-appointments-highlight-a-secret-process/article_3b1b3250-361f-50ec-b21c-bf18ed94defc.html|title=Supreme Court appointments highlight a secret process | work=The Star |access-date=March 20, 2024}}</ref>
* [[Michael J. Moldaver]] (October 21, 2011–present)<ref name=SecretProcess/>
* [[Richard Wagner (judge)|Richard Wagner]] (October 5, 2012–present)
* [[Clément Gascon]] (June 9, 2014 – September 15, 2019)
* [[Russell Brown (judge)|Russell Brown]] (August 31, 2015–present)


===Phoenix pay system===
===Marshall Rothstein===
In keeping with Harper's election promise to change the [[Judicial appointments in Canada|appointment process]], Rothstein's appointment involved a review by a parliamentary committee, following his nomination by the prime minister. Rothstein had already been short-listed, with two other candidates, by a committee convened by Paul Martin's previous Liberal government, and he was Harper's choice. Harper then had Rothstein appear before an ''[[ad hoc]]'' non-partisan committee of 12 [[members of parliament|members of Parliament]]. This committee was not empowered to block the appointment, though, as had been called for by some members of Harper's Conservative Party.<ref>{{Cite news|work=Globe and Mail|format=fee required|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20060220.w2harper02201/BNStory/National/home|date=February 20, 2006|access-date=December 6, 2006|title=Committee to judge next Supreme Court appointee|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060223083307/http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20060220.w2harper02201/BNStory/National/home|archive-date=February 23, 2006|df=mdy-all}}</ref>
[[Stephen Harper]] introduced the [[Phoenix pay system]] as part of his 2009 Transformation of Pay Administration Initiative, to replace Canada's 40-year old system with a new improved, cost-saving "automated, off-the-shelf commercial system." In June 2011, [[IBM]] won the sole-source contract to set up the system, using [[PeopleSoft]] software, the original contract was for $5.7 million, but IBM was eventually paid $185 million.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/phoenix-ibm-contract-union-pay-government-1.4295827|title=IBM contract cost for failure-plagued Phoenix payroll system jumped to total $185M|work=CBC News|access-date=2018-01-05|language=en}}</ref> According to ''[[The New York Times]]'', [[Oracle Corporation]]'s PeopleSoft software system was "widely used by corporations and institutions to manage operations, finances and employees."<ref name="NYT_ Ian Austen_20161117">{{Cite news| title = A New Payroll System Misfires, and Canadians Ask: Where's My Pay? |newspaper= The New York Times|first= Ian |last=Austen|date=November 17, 2019| access-date = December 15, 2019| url = https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/18/world/canada/government-workers-pay.html}}</ref> In March 2014, according to an IBM spokeswoman, the Crown took over responsibility for "training design and execution" from IBM," in a cost-saving measure. The government adopted a 'train the trainer' approach rather than follow IBM's recommended system.<ref name="CBC_Simpson_20160929">{{Cite news|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/conservatives-took-phoenix-training-away-from-ibm-1.3779917|title=Conservatives took payroll training responsibilities away from Phoenix creator IBM {{!}} CBC News|first=Katie |last=Simpson |work=CBC News|date=September 29, 2016 |language=en|access-date=2019-03-07}}</ref>


===Thomas Cromwell===
Prior to 2012, about 2,000 pay advisors/specialists in 101 federal departments and agencies "processed pay, advised employees, and corrected errors" in scattered locations.<ref name="OAG_report_20170925"/> When the new Miramichi Public Service Pay Centre was opened in May 2012, the PSPC began to eliminate pay advisor positions in 46 individual departments and agencies and replace them with "460 pay advisors and 90 support staff" at new centralized location in Pay Centre. By 2016, the PSPC had cut 1,200 pay advisor positions.<ref name="OAG_report_20170925"/> Following centralization, these departments and agencies administrators no longer had "direct access to the new pay system." There were an additional 55 departments and agencies who maintained about approximately 800 pay advisors who continued to enter pay information for their own employees in the new Phoenix system.<ref name="OAG_report_20170925"/>
On September 5, 2008, Harper nominated Thomas Cromwell of [[Nova Scotia Court of Appeal]] to fill the Supreme Court seat left vacant by the departure of [[Michel Bastarache]]. By and large Cromwell's nomination was well received, with many lauding the selection;<ref name=theglobeandmail2>{{Cite news|work=Globe and Mail|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080905.wscoc0905/BNStory/National|archive-url=https://archive.today/20090116004823/http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080905.wscoc0905/BNStory/National|url-status=dead|archive-date=January 16, 2009|date=September 5, 2008|access-date=September 10, 2008|title=Harper nominates Nova Scotian to Supreme Court}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|work=Globe and Mail|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080909.wecromwell09/BNStory/specialComment|date=September 9, 2008|access-date=September 10, 2008|title=No sign of a hidden agenda}}{{dead link|date=December 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> however, dissent has been noted surrounding the nomination. First, Harper bypassed Parliament's Supreme Court selection panel, which was supposed to produce a list of three candidates for him to choose from.<ref name=theglobeandmail2/> Second, Newfoundland and Labrador [[justice minister|Justice Minister]] [[Jerome Kennedy]] criticized the appointment, citing the [[Government of Newfoundland and Labrador]]'s belief that [[constitutional convention (political custom)|constitutional convention]] stipulates that a Newfoundlander should have been named to the court in the rotation of Atlantic Canadian Supreme Court representation.<ref>{{Cite news|work=Globe and Mail |author=Kirk Makin |url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/harper-blasted-over-hasty-top-court-nomination/article17971282/ |date=September 9, 2008 |title=Harper blasted over hasty top-court nomination |access-date=April 10, 2021}}</ref>


===Marc Nadon===
In May 2015, IBM made the recommendation that government delay its planned rollout of Phoenix due to critical problems.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.itworldcanada.com/article/phoenix-payroll-system-timeline-of-the-governments-problems/396407|title=Phoenix payroll system: Timeline of the government's problems|last=Bradbury|first=Danny|website=IT World Canada|date=September 11, 2017|language=en-US|access-date=2019-03-07}}</ref> In June 2015, before Phoenix was launched, some federal employees complained about not being paid, and there were reports that the Miramachi pay centre employees were overwhelmed.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/miramichi-public-service-pay-centre-staff-struggling-with-workload-1.3126806|title=Miramichi struggling with 'too many' federal pay centre accounts|work=CBC News|access-date=2018-01-05|language=en}}</ref> The Auditor General's May 29, 2018 report "Building and Implementing the Phoenix Pay System" found that in June 2015, Public Services and Procurement Canada cancelled a pilot to test Phoenix in a single department to assess whether Phoenix was ready for government wide use.<ref name="OAG_20180529">{{Cite report|url=http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_oag_201805_01_e_43033.html#hd2a|title=Building and Implementing the Phoenix Pay System|work=Office of the Auditor General of Canada|date=May 29, 2018|access-date=May 21, 2019}}</ref>
On October 3, 2013, Harper announced the nomination of supernumerary [[Federal Court of Appeal (Canada)|Federal Court of Appeals]] judge, [[Marc Nadon]] to the Supreme Court to replace the retiring [[Morris Fish]].<ref name=autogenerated1c>{{cite web|publisher=Prime Minister of Canada |url=http://pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?category=1&featureId=6&pageId=26&id=5714 |title=PM announces appointment of Justice Marc Nadon to the Supreme Court of Canada |access-date=October 3, 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131004220405/http://pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?category=1&featureId=6&pageId=26&id=5714 |archive-date=October 4, 2013 |df=mdy }}</ref> The appointment was challenged by both Ontario lawyer [[Rocco Galati]] and the [[Government of Quebec]] as being contrary to the appointment criteria of section 6 of the ''[[Supreme Court Act]]''. In response, Harper referred the criteria issue to the Supreme Court, as well as the question of whether the government's amendments to the criteria were constitutional. The Supreme Court subsequently ruled in ''[[Reference re Supreme Court Act, ss. 5 and 6]]'' that the Nadon appointment was invalid, and that the federal government could not unilaterally amend the ''Supreme Court Act''. Harper subsequently nominated [[Clement Gascon]] to the position instead.<ref>{{Cite web|date=June 3, 2014|title=Quebec judge Clement Gascon nominated to Supreme Court|url=https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/quebec-judge-clement-gascon-nominated-to-supreme-court-1.1851430?cache=%3FclipId%3D68596|access-date=April 13, 2021|website=CTVNews|language=en}}</ref>


== See also ==
By 2018, Phoenix has caused pay problems to over 50 percent of the federal government’s 290,000 public servants through underpayments, over-payments, and non-payments.<ref name="Mockler_20180731">{{cite report |url=https://sencanada.ca/content/sen/committee/421/NFFN/Reports/NFFN_Phoenix_Report_32_WEB_e.pdf |date=July 31, 2018 |access-date=May 21, 2019 |pages=34 |title=The Phoenix Pay Problem: Working Towards a Solution |series=Report of the Standing Senate Committee on National Finance |work=Standing Senate Committee on National Finance |location=Ottawa, Ontario}}</ref> The Office of the Auditor General (OAG) conducted two reports, one if 2017<ref name="OAG_report_20170925">{{cite report |work=Office of the Auditor General of Canada |location=Ottawa, Ontario |date=September 25, 2017 |access-date=May 21, 2019 |title=Phoenix Pay Problems |url=http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_oag_201711_01_e_42666.html}}</ref> and another in 2018<ref name="OAG_20180529"/> reviewing the [[Phoenix Pay System]]—a payroll processing system for [[Government of Canada|Canadian federal government]] employees that is run by [[Public Services and Procurement Canada]] (PSPC) which has been controversial for a number of years—<ref name="OAG_20180529"/><ref name="OAG_report_20170925"/> The 2018 report said that the Phoenix system was an "'incomprehensible failure' of project management and oversight."<ref name="iPolitics_Lim_20190516">{{Cite news| date = May 16, 2019| first = Jolson |last=Lim| title = Phoenix replacement won't be launched until 2023, but may save millions: PBO| work = iPolitics| access-date = November 2, 2019| url = https://ipolitics.ca/2019/05/16/phoenix-replacement-wont-be-launched-until-2023-but-may-save-millions-pbo/}}</ref>
* [[Premiership of Pierre Trudeau]]

* [[Premiership of Jean Chrétien]]
==Campaign promises==
* [[Premiership of Justin Trudeau]]

The federal governments of [[Justin Trudeau]] and [[Stephen Harper]] fulfilled the majority of their campaign promises and scored highest on fulfilling their campaign promises compared to any other "Canadian government over the last 35 years", according to an August 30, 2019 publication based on research at [[Laval University]]. The 237-page publication, ''Assessing Justin Trudeau’s Liberal Government. 353 promises and a mandate for change,'' includes the work of "two dozen Canadian academics". They found that Justin Trudeau's Liberal government kept 92 percent of pledges, when complete and partial pledges were added together, while the Harper government kept 85 percent of complete and partial pledges. When only completed, realized pledges were calculated, Harper's government, in their last year, kept 77 percent of promises while the Liberal government kept 53.5 percent. The book notes that Harper's pledges tended towards transactional pledges which target sub-populations while Trudeau's government's promises were transformative.<ref name="UBC_review_20190826">{{Citation|title=Review: Assessing Justin Trudeau's Liberal Government: 353 Promises and a Mandate for Change|date=August 26, 2019|url=https://www.ubcpress.ca/assessing-justin-trudeaus-liberal-government|work=Les Presses de l'Université Laval, [[Laval University Press]]|access-date=November 2, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Blatchford|first1=Andy|title=New book examines Trudeau government's record of living up to pledges|work=The Globe and Mail|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-new-book-examines-trudeau-governments-record-of-living-up-to-pledges/|access-date=October 13, 2019}}</ref><ref name="CTV_20190825">{{Cite news|last=Blatchford|first=Andy|date=August 25, 2019|title=Trudeau government's 353 pre-election promises assessed in new book|work=The Canadian Press via CTV News|url=https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/trudeau-government-s-353-pre-election-promises-assessed-in-new-book-1.4564103|access-date=November 2, 2019}}</ref>


==References==
==References==
{{Reflist|30em}}
{{Reflist|30em}}


{{s-start}}
{{s-other|Canadian federal premierships}}
{{s-bef|before=[[Paul Martin#Prime Minister (2003–2006)|Paul Martin]]}}
{{s-ttl|title=Stephen Harper|years=2006–2015}}
{{s-aft|after=[[Premiership of Justin Trudeau|Justin Trudeau]]}}
{{s-end}}
{{Harper Government}}
{{Harper Government}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Premiership Of Stephen Harper}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Premiership of Harper, Stephen}}
[[Category:Premiership of Stephen Harper| ]]
[[Category:Canadian premierships|Harper, Stephen]]
[[Category:History of the Conservative Party of Canada]]
[[Category:2006 establishments in Canada]]
[[Category:2006 establishments in Canada]]
[[Category:2015 disestablishments in Canada]]
[[Category:2015 disestablishments in Canada]]
[[Category:Stephen Harper]]
[[Category:Canadian premierships|Harper, Stephen]]

Latest revision as of 21:59, 15 November 2024

Stephen Harper
Premiership of Stephen Harper
February 6, 2006 – November 4, 2015
MonarchElizabeth II
Cabinet28th Canadian Ministry
PartyConservative
Election
Appointed byMichaëlle Jean
SeatOffice of the Prime Minister


The premiership of Stephen Harper began on February 6, 2006, when the first Cabinet headed by Stephen Harper was sworn in by Governor General Michaelle Jean. Harper was invited to form the 28th Canadian Ministry and become Prime Minister of Canada following the 2006 federal election, where Harper led his Conservative Party to win a plurality of seats in the House of Commons of Canada, defeating the Liberal government of Prime Minister Paul Martin. Harper led his Conservatives to win a larger minority government in 2008 and a majority government in 2011. In the 2015 federal election, Harper's Conservatives lost power to a Liberal majority government under Justin Trudeau.

Background

[edit]

From Canadian Confederation until the 1993 election, the Liberal Party's control has been the rule of who was in power in Canada, with short-lived Conservative governments to break up their long stretches of governance. Stephen Harper, then a member of Parliament, and political scientist Tom Flanagan described this as "a benign dictatorship, not under a strict one-party rule, but under a one-party-plus system beset by the factionalism, regionalism and cronyism that accompany any such system".[1] In 1993, the Progressive Conservatives were reduced from a majority government to fifth place and two seats in the House of Commons. They were displaced by the Reform Party of Canada in Western Canada, the Bloc Québécois in Québec, and the Liberals throughout the country due to vote splitting.[2]

Harper was elected in 1993 as a Reform MP. He resigned before the 1997 election and became an advocate of the Unite the Right movement, which argued for a merger of the Progressive Conservative and Reform Parties. Harper went on to win the leadership of the Canadian Alliance (the successor party to the Reform Party) in 2002. In 2003, Harper and Progressive Conservative leader Peter MacKay agreed to merge their parties into the new Conservative Party of Canada.[3] Harper was elected leader of the new party in 2004.

In the 2004 election, the Liberals were reduced to a minority government due to a government spending scandal and the success of the newly united right-of-centre opposition party. Harper went on to lead the Conservatives to win a plurality of seats in the 2006 election[4] and formed the smallest minority government in Canadian history.[5]

[edit]

The Conservatives won 124 (or 40.3% of the total) seats in the House of Commons of Canada in the 2006 election while receiving 36.3% of the popular vote, and won 143 seats (or 46.4% of the total) in the 2008 election while receiving 37.7% of the popular vote. In the 2011 election, the Conservatives won 166 seats (54% of the total) with 39.6% of the popular vote.

Conventional wisdom before the 2011 election previously held that winning a federal majority without significant support in the province of Quebec would be near impossible.[6] The Conservatives disproved this, winning an eleven-seat majority with only five seats in Quebec. The Conservatives won considerably more popular support outside of Quebec than they did elsewhere, carrying 48% of the popular vote outside of Quebec. This was only the second time in Canadian history that a federal government was formed without a substantial number of seats from Quebec.

Media speculation was the Conservatives would need to win in excess of 40% of the popular vote to form a majority government, the stated goal of Harper in the 2011 election. However, the Liberal Party was able to win a majority with only 38.5% of the popular vote in 1997. The Conservatives have previously come very close to a majority with 37.7% of the popular vote (12 seats short) in 2008 and with 35.9% of the vote (6 seats short) in 1979.

Harper led the government through the longest lasting federal minority government in Canadian history, which ended when he achieved a majority victory in 2011.

Opinion polling between the 2006 and 2008 federal elections

[edit]

From December 2006 to August 2008, the Conservatives and Liberals exchanged leads in opinion polls. From September through the election in October 2008, the Conservative led in all polls.

Opinion polling between the 2008 and 2011 federal elections

[edit]

The Conservatives led in every public opinion poll released from March 2010 to the election. From January to September 2009 and again from January to February 2010 several polls showed the Liberals tied with or slightly leading Harper's Conservatives.

Opinion polling after the 2011 federal election

[edit]

The Conservatives continued to maintain 37–39% support after the election. In March 2012, some polls showed the NDP tied with or surpassing the Conservatives and others show the Conservatives with a slim lead.[7][8][9] In May 2012, the Tories dipped into second place behind the NDP,[10] but the NDP quickly dropped again. In April 2013, the Conservatives dropped in second place in the polls behind the Liberals and their new leader Justin Trudeau. The Liberals would keep their lead until 2015. Upon the beginning of the election campaign in summer 2015, the three main federal parties were neck and neck with about 30% each in most polls.[11] The Liberals ended up edging out the other parties during the campaign, and won the 2015 Canadian federal election.

Relationship with parliament, opposition parties

[edit]

For most of Harper's tenure as prime minister, he led a minority government meaning he relied on the support (or abstention) of other parties in order to maintain the confidence of the House of Commons. The Harper government often relied on the official opposition Liberal caucus abstaining in whole[12] or in part[13] in order to allow confidence measures to pass. The government lost its first confidence vote on a Liberal sponsored censure motion on March 25, 2011, prompting Harper to seek dissolution and the calling of the 2011 general election.

Confidence in the House of Commons

[edit]

The principal motions of confidence in the Canadian House of Commons are matters of supply (motions and bills concerning the budget and spending government monies) and the motion in reply to the Speech from the Throne. The government may also designate any vote to be a matter of confidence, and opposition parties may introduce motions that explicitly express a lack of confidence in the government. During this period of Harper's tenureship, he began to increase the scope of what bills of the government could be considered confidence measures, reflecting the increasing willingness of the government to trigger an election based on favourable polling conditions.

Non-confidence motion and prorogation of Parliament, 2008

[edit]

Harper precipitated a national controversy, which threatened to overturn his government, by fielding a spending bill in the fall of 2008 which would have stripped taxpayer funding from political parties and taken away[14] the right to strike from Canadian public service workers as purported solutions to the effects in Canada of the global economic crisis. Outraged opposition parties formed a coalition intending to call a vote of non-confidence that would have toppled the Harper government, but he avoided the impending vote of non-confidence by asking the Governor General to prorogue Parliament until January 26, 2009. Following the resumption of parliament, Harper introduced a new budget which was allowed to pass when members of the Liberal caucus abstained from the vote.

Senate appointments

[edit]

As prime minister, Harper recommended the appointment of 38 persons to the Senate of Canada. All of these senators were members of Harper's Conservative Party. Three (Michael Fortier, Fabian Manning, and Larry Smith) subsequently resigned from the Senate to seek election to the House of Commons.

Harper had long been an advocate of an elected Senate and appointed four senators (Bert Brown, Betty Unger, Doug Black, and Scott Tannas) based on the result of Alberta Senate nominee elections. Harper introduced legislation to provide for elections to advise the prime minister on whom to recommend for appointment to the Senate and to cause appointed senators to serve fixed terms, to, in essence, create a de facto elected Senate without changing the constitution.[citation needed] Harper's Senate appointments and reform proposals were criticized for failing to address the balance of seats among provinces, possibly being unconstitutional, and for running contrary to the spirit of his previous pledges for an elected senate. Harper argued that, without appointing senators, the Liberals would have continued to enjoy a majority in the senate despite lacking popular support, the senate would become less and less able to function, and all of his appointees agreed to resign and seek election to the senate should his reform proposals pass.[15]

Libel suit against Liberal Party

[edit]

Harper launched a lawsuit on March 13, 2008, against the Liberal Party of Canada over statements published on the party's website concerning the Chuck Cadman affair. This was the first time a sitting prime minister had sued the opposition for libel. The $2.5-million suit named "The Liberal Party, the Federal Liberal Agency of Canada, and the unnamed author or authors of the statements published on the Liberal website". The articles at the centre of the lawsuit were headlined "Harper knew of Conservative bribery"[16] and "Harper must come clean about allegations of Conservative Bribery".[17] Those articles questioned Harper's alleged involvement in financial offers made to Cadman to sway his vote in a crucial 2005 Commons showdown. The suit filed in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice did not name Liberal Leader Stéphane Dion or MPs Ralph Goodale and Michael Ignatieff—whom Harper had also threatened to sue.[18] The lawsuit was settled out of court in 2009 with both parties not disclosing the terms of settlement.[19]

Dona Cadman said that prior to the May 2005 budget vote, Tom Flanagan and Doug Finley, two Conservative Party officials, offered her husband, Chuck Cadman, a million-dollar life insurance policy in exchange for his vote to bring down the Liberal government.[20]

Domestic and foreign policy

[edit]
Harper, Mexican President Peña Nieto, and U.S. President Barack Obama at the 2014 North American Leaders' Summit

Harper's government introduced 9 budgets. The 2011 budget was not passed prior to the calling of the 2011 general election, but was adopted soon afterward. Starting in 2008, each of his budgets ran a substantial deficit as a result of the 2008 global recession.[21] Budgetary equilibrium returned in 2013, earlier than it was originally predicted. Harper's economic policy included a multitude of new spending and reduced government revenue revenues due to reductions to the Goods and Services Tax and corporate income taxes. Harper campaigned on a pledge to increase defense spending and has cut it in real terms.[22]

As with any Canadian government, the principal foreign relations issue is the relationship with the United States, Canada's closest neighbour and largest trading partner. The ongoing War in Afghanistan was also a major foreign policy issue for the Harper government, who withdrew Canadian troops from Afghanistan in 2011. As a result of economic sanctions against officials of the Russian government stemming from the annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation, Harper had to contend with a sharp reduction in trade with Russia.[23]

Scandals

[edit]

Harper's Conservatives gained criticism for improper election spending during the 2006 federal election The scandal was known as the In and Out scandal. Parliamentary hearings into the issue led to a deadlocking of various committees, and then to the snap election in 2008. On 6 March 2012, charges were dropped as part of a plea deal in which the Conservative Party of Canada and its fundraising arm pleaded guilty to exceeding election spending limits and submitting fraudulent election records, and agreed to repay $230,198.00 for its role in violating Canadian election spending laws.[24]

In February 2012, the Robocall scandal emerged regarding attempts at voter suppression targeting non-Conservative voters in 200 ridings during the 2011 election.[25] The Royal Canadian Mounted Police and Elections Canada investigated the calls[26] but ultimately did not refer the matter to the Director of Public Prosecutions.[27] Michael Sona (a Conservative campaign worker in the riding of Guelph) was later found guilty of one count of willfully preventing or endeavoring to prevent an elector from voting in an election, an offence under the Canada Elections Act, and sentenced to nine months in prison.[28]

Cabinet

[edit]

Although the majority of Conservative seats were from the Western provinces, the majority of names which Harper put forward to the Governor General for appointment as Cabinet Ministers were from Ontario and Quebec, in the interests of regional balance. The new Conservative Cabinet was substantially smaller than the prior Martin government because it initially did away with junior ministers (known as Ministers of State, and previously Secretaries of State). Several pundits in the media described Harper's Cabinet as moderate, and a tempering of the Conservative Party's roots in the Canadian Alliance and Reform.[who?]

Deputy Prime Minister and succession

[edit]

Unlike his recent predecessors, Harper did not name one of his colleagues to the largely honorific post of Deputy Prime Minister. Harper did, however, name an order of succession to act on his behalf in certain circumstances, starting with Cannon, then Jim Prentice, then the balance of his cabinet in order of precedence.

Media relations

[edit]

Unlike previous Prime Ministers of Canada, Harper insisted that the Prime Minister's Office had the right to choose which reporters ask questions at press conferences,[29] which, along with other steps aimed at limiting and controlling media access, created conflict with national media.[30] It was reported that the Prime Minister's Office also "often [informed] the media about Harper's trips at such short notice that [it was] impossible for Ottawa journalists to attend the events."[31]

Before the 2011 election, the Canadian Association of Journalists wrote a letter to the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics strongly criticizing the Canadian government for severely restricting access to documents that should be made available to Canadian citizens.[32] The CAJ stated, "Open government is not revolutionary and the government of Canada is behind compared to other nations and even some provinces."[citation needed]

In 2011 Stephen Harper violated copyright when he sang the song "Imagine" without permission of the owner in a video that was later uploaded to YouTube. As a result, the video was removed by request of Yoko Ono’s publishing company.[33] Although Canada's 2012 Copyright Modernization Act permits non-profit performances of copyrighted songs like "Imagine", it is still not legal to upload recordings of such performances to the Internet.[34]

"Canada's New Government" and "Harper Government"

[edit]

While Her Majesty's Governments of various political stripes have traditionally used the term "Government of Canada" to describe the government in its communications materials, the Harper government broke that tradition for two extended periods. From taking office in February 2006 until October 2007, the government was branded "Canada's New Government" and from late-2010 to mid-2011 it was branded the "Harper Government". The former was the subject of ridicule by other parties and some media commentators,[35] while the latter was criticized by some academics and former civil servants as a partisan misuse of government resources.[36] This is "political marketing", as constitutionally, any Government of Canada administered by a Canadian Ministry—Harper's premiership being the 28th Canadian Ministry— is known formally as "Her Majesty's Government".

Harperism

[edit]

The term Harperism was coined and used by some in the Canadian media to describe the Harper's policies and style during his premiership. The term has been used pejoratively to describe what some see as Harper's authoritarian approach to his cabinet and in the prorogation of the 40th Canadian parliament.[37]

Campaign promises

[edit]

The federal governments of Justin Trudeau and Stephen Harper fulfilled the majority of their campaign promises and scored highest on fulfilling their campaign promises compared to any other "Canadian government over the last 35 years", according to an August 30, 2019 publication based on research at Laval University. The 237-page publication, Assessing Justin Trudeau’s Liberal Government. 353 promises and a mandate for change, includes the work of "two dozen Canadian academics". They found that Justin Trudeau's Liberal government kept 92 percent of pledges, when complete and partial pledges were added together, while the Harper government kept 85 percent of complete and partial pledges. When only completed, realized pledges were calculated, Harper's government, in their last year, kept 77 percent of promises while the Liberal government kept 53.5 percent. The book notes that Harper's pledges tended towards transactional pledges which target sub-populations while Trudeau's government's promises were transformative.[38][39][40]

Supreme Court nominations

[edit]

Harper chose the following jurists to be appointed as justices of the Supreme Court of Canada by the governor general:

Marshall Rothstein

[edit]

In keeping with Harper's election promise to change the appointment process, Rothstein's appointment involved a review by a parliamentary committee, following his nomination by the prime minister. Rothstein had already been short-listed, with two other candidates, by a committee convened by Paul Martin's previous Liberal government, and he was Harper's choice. Harper then had Rothstein appear before an ad hoc non-partisan committee of 12 members of Parliament. This committee was not empowered to block the appointment, though, as had been called for by some members of Harper's Conservative Party.[42]

Thomas Cromwell

[edit]

On September 5, 2008, Harper nominated Thomas Cromwell of Nova Scotia Court of Appeal to fill the Supreme Court seat left vacant by the departure of Michel Bastarache. By and large Cromwell's nomination was well received, with many lauding the selection;[43][44] however, dissent has been noted surrounding the nomination. First, Harper bypassed Parliament's Supreme Court selection panel, which was supposed to produce a list of three candidates for him to choose from.[43] Second, Newfoundland and Labrador Justice Minister Jerome Kennedy criticized the appointment, citing the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador's belief that constitutional convention stipulates that a Newfoundlander should have been named to the court in the rotation of Atlantic Canadian Supreme Court representation.[45]

Marc Nadon

[edit]

On October 3, 2013, Harper announced the nomination of supernumerary Federal Court of Appeals judge, Marc Nadon to the Supreme Court to replace the retiring Morris Fish.[46] The appointment was challenged by both Ontario lawyer Rocco Galati and the Government of Quebec as being contrary to the appointment criteria of section 6 of the Supreme Court Act. In response, Harper referred the criteria issue to the Supreme Court, as well as the question of whether the government's amendments to the criteria were constitutional. The Supreme Court subsequently ruled in Reference re Supreme Court Act, ss. 5 and 6 that the Nadon appointment was invalid, and that the federal government could not unilaterally amend the Supreme Court Act. Harper subsequently nominated Clement Gascon to the position instead.[47]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Stephen Harper and Tom Flanagan: Our Benign Dictatorship, Next City, Winter 1996/97". Scribd. Retrieved October 10, 2019.
  2. ^ "Crushed Tories rewrite history". Windsor Star. October 26, 1992. p. A1.
  3. ^ Sean Gordon (March 20, 2004). "Front-runner Harper always surprised foes". The Leader-Post. Regina. p. F9.
  4. ^ Michel Comte (January 24, 2006). "Canadian PM Martin lets dream slip away in election". Agence France Presse.
  5. ^ "Electoral Results by Party". Parliament of Canada. Retrieved April 26, 2011.
  6. ^ Persichilli, Angelo (May 15, 2011). "Harper and McGuinty called Quebec's bluff". The Star. Toronto. Retrieved March 20, 2024.
  7. ^ Size, John (April 15, 2012). "Mulcair targets Tories as NDP poll numbers surge". Retrieved April 25, 2017.
  8. ^ "Conservative popularity sinks but Stephen Harper approval holds steady: poll". Retrieved March 20, 2024.
  9. ^ "Ipsos Nation Poll". Archived from the original on April 19, 2012. Retrieved April 17, 2012.
  10. ^ "Search". The Globe and Mail. Toronto. June 18, 2012.
  11. ^ Murphy, Jessica (August 7, 2015). "Tom Mulcair and Canada's New Democrat party lead push for change". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved September 19, 2023.
  12. ^ Brodie Fenlon (October 31, 2007). "Tax cuts pass easily as Liberals abstain". Globe and Mail. Toronto.
  13. ^ Andrew Mayeda (March 4, 2008). "Liberals abstain, Harper government survives budget vote". National Post.
  14. ^ "Strike ban proposal 'atrocious,' unions say". Canada.com. November 28, 2008. Archived from the original on November 9, 2012. Retrieved April 25, 2017.
  15. ^ Richard J. Brennan (August 27, 2009). "Harper appoints 9 to Senate". Toronto Star. Retrieved March 20, 2024.
  16. ^ "Harper Knew of Conservative Bribery". Archived from the original on February 1, 2009. Retrieved February 22, 2016.
  17. ^ "Harper Must Come Clean About Allegations of Conservative Bribery, Liberals say". Archived from the original on February 1, 2009. Retrieved February 22, 2016.
  18. ^ "Harper files libel suit against Liberals over Cadman statements". The Canadian Press. Archived from the original on March 15, 2008. Retrieved March 13, 2008.
  19. ^ Authier, Nicolas. "Harper, Liberals settle Cadman lawsuit". National post. Retrieved March 20, 2024.
  20. ^ Gloria Galloway; Brian Laghi. "Tories tried to sway vote of dying MP, widow alleges". The Globe and Mail. Toronto. Archived from the original on March 2, 2008. Retrieved February 27, 2008.
  21. ^ Dodge, David; Dion, Richard (October 19, 2016). "Economic performance and policy during the Harper years". Policy Options. Retrieved September 19, 2023.
  22. ^ Simpson, Jeffrey (June 28, 2014). "The Harper government loves the military – in theory". www.theglobeandmail.com. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved June 28, 2014.
  23. ^ "Canada's trade relationship with Russia". Retrieved April 25, 2017.
  24. ^ "Conservatives drop appeal of 'in-and-out' ruling". The National Post. March 6, 2012. Retrieved March 20, 2024.
  25. ^ Stephen Maher; Glen McGregor (March 2, 2012). "More than a dozen ridings blitzed by harassing fake Liberal phone calls in 2011 election". Ottawa Citizen.[permanent dead link]
  26. ^ Stephen Maher; Glen McGregor (February 27, 2012). "Elections Canada investigating 'robocalls' that misled voters". Ottawa Citizen.[permanent dead link]
  27. ^ "Commissioner of Canada Elections Issues Report on Deceptive Communications Investigation". Elections Canada. April 24, 2014. Retrieved May 14, 2014.
  28. ^ McGregor, Glen (November 19, 2014). "Michael Sona gets nine months in jail for his role in 2011 robocalls scandal". National Post. Retrieved March 20, 2024.
  29. ^ "Harper says he's finished with Ottawa press corps". CBC News. May 24, 2006.
  30. ^ "canada.com - Page Not Found". Archived from the original on April 30, 2007. Retrieved April 25, 2017 – via Canada.com. {{cite web}}: Cite uses generic title (help)
  31. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on September 29, 2007. Retrieved September 20, 2017.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  32. ^ http://www.caj.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/ETHI-submission.pdf [bare URL PDF]
  33. ^ "Yoko Ono". Retrieved April 25, 2017.
  34. ^ "Consolidated federal laws of canada, Copyright Modernization Act". March 15, 2017. Retrieved April 25, 2017.
  35. ^ "It's official: Tory government no longer new". Canada.com. 26 October 2007. Archived from the original on November 10, 2012. Retrieved April 26, 2011.
  36. ^ Bruce Cheadle (March 3, 2011). "Tories re-brand government in Stephen Harper's name". Globe and Mail. Toronto. Canadian Press. Retrieved April 26, 2011.
  37. ^ Gutstein, Donald (September 3, 2014). Harperism: How Stephen Harper and his think tank colleagues have transformed Canada.
  38. ^ "Review: Assessing Justin Trudeau's Liberal Government: 353 Promises and a Mandate for Change", Les Presses de l'Université Laval, Laval University Press, August 26, 2019, retrieved November 2, 2019
  39. ^ Blatchford, Andy. "New book examines Trudeau government's record of living up to pledges". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved October 13, 2019.
  40. ^ Blatchford, Andy (August 25, 2019). "Trudeau government's 353 pre-election promises assessed in new book". The Canadian Press via CTV News. Retrieved November 2, 2019.
  41. ^ a b "Supreme Court appointments highlight a secret process". The Star. Retrieved March 20, 2024.
  42. ^ "Committee to judge next Supreme Court appointee". Globe and Mail. February 20, 2006. Archived from the original (fee required) on February 23, 2006. Retrieved December 6, 2006.
  43. ^ a b "Harper nominates Nova Scotian to Supreme Court". Globe and Mail. September 5, 2008. Archived from the original on January 16, 2009. Retrieved September 10, 2008.
  44. ^ "No sign of a hidden agenda". Globe and Mail. September 9, 2008. Retrieved September 10, 2008.[permanent dead link]
  45. ^ Kirk Makin (September 9, 2008). "Harper blasted over hasty top-court nomination". Globe and Mail. Retrieved April 10, 2021.
  46. ^ "PM announces appointment of Justice Marc Nadon to the Supreme Court of Canada". Prime Minister of Canada. Archived from the original on October 4, 2013. Retrieved October 3, 2013.
  47. ^ "Quebec judge Clement Gascon nominated to Supreme Court". CTVNews. June 3, 2014. Retrieved April 13, 2021.
Canadian federal premierships
Preceded by Stephen Harper
2006–2015
Succeeded by