Talk:David Gilmour (writer): Difference between revisions
Tom.Reding (talk | contribs) m →top: -dup blp params |
|||
(10 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|blp=yes|listas=Gilmour, David|1= |
|||
{{WikiProject Biography |
{{WikiProject Biography|a&e-work-group=yes}} |
||
|living=yes |
|||
⚫ | |||
|class=Stub |
|||
⚫ | |||
|a&e-work-group=yes |
|||
|listas=Gilmour, David |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
== No controversy cited in controversy section == |
== No controversy cited in controversy section == |
||
Line 12: | Line 9: | ||
I agree that the RH interview was notable, but there is no controversy or criticism of his remarks cited in that section, which makes it unfair to call it a "controversy" unless the only goal was to shame him because the WP editor found his remarks despicable. That is not the purpose of WP, this is not the comment section of the RH post or a social media network (the only places where I saw this controversy), so we would need some actual published critics lambasting him for the remarks or some censure from his school etc. to keep that label or even the section. [[User:JesseRafe|JesseRafe]] ([[User talk:JesseRafe|talk]]) 13:19, 27 September 2013 (UTC) |
I agree that the RH interview was notable, but there is no controversy or criticism of his remarks cited in that section, which makes it unfair to call it a "controversy" unless the only goal was to shame him because the WP editor found his remarks despicable. That is not the purpose of WP, this is not the comment section of the RH post or a social media network (the only places where I saw this controversy), so we would need some actual published critics lambasting him for the remarks or some censure from his school etc. to keep that label or even the section. [[User:JesseRafe|JesseRafe]] ([[User talk:JesseRafe|talk]]) 13:19, 27 September 2013 (UTC) |
||
:I've removed this section for this reason. Claiming there was a 'controversy' without any sources (even the source for the interview was a dead link) is a violation of [[WP:BLP]]. [[User:Robofish|Robofish]] ([[User talk:Robofish|talk]]) 16:19, 27 September 2013 (UTC) |
:I've removed this section for this reason. Claiming there was a 'controversy' without any sources (even the source for the interview was a dead link) is a violation of [[WP:BLP]]. [[User:Robofish|Robofish]] ([[User talk:Robofish|talk]]) 16:19, 27 September 2013 (UTC) |
||
::Not sure if a blog can count as a source but I've seen this pop up in my FB newsfeed a few times over the last couple of days - http://bellejarblog.wordpress.com/2013/09/25/an-open-letter-to-david-gilmour/ [[User:TheTyrant|TheTyrant]] ([[User talk:TheTyrant|talk]]) 16:34, 27 September 2013 (UTC)TheTyrant |
|||
::Or perhaps this will work better - http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/holger-syme/holger-syme-david-gilmour_b_3996818.html [[User:TheTyrant|TheTyrant]] ([[User talk:TheTyrant|talk]]) 20:37, 27 September 2013 (UTC)TheTyrant |
|||
so this is left without something he's notable for? the transcript of the interview is online, and there are many mentions of the interview and his sexism out there. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ann Burlingham|Ann Burlingham]] ([[User talk:Ann Burlingham#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ann Burlingham|contribs]]) 17:31, 6 February 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> perhaps link back to Keller's page, where he is linked, as are articles. |
|||
== External links modified == |
|||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|||
I have just modified one external link on [[David Gilmour (writer)]]. Please take a moment to review [[special:diff/820340734|my edit]]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100114130119/http://walrusmagazine.com/articles/2006.07-memoir-david-gilmour-my-life-with-tolstoy/ to http://www.walrusmagazine.com/articles/2006.07-memoir-david-gilmour-my-life-with-tolstoy/ |
|||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. |
|||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} |
|||
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 06:26, 14 January 2018 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 22:18, 15 November 2024
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
No controversy cited in controversy section
[edit]I agree that the RH interview was notable, but there is no controversy or criticism of his remarks cited in that section, which makes it unfair to call it a "controversy" unless the only goal was to shame him because the WP editor found his remarks despicable. That is not the purpose of WP, this is not the comment section of the RH post or a social media network (the only places where I saw this controversy), so we would need some actual published critics lambasting him for the remarks or some censure from his school etc. to keep that label or even the section. JesseRafe (talk) 13:19, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- I've removed this section for this reason. Claiming there was a 'controversy' without any sources (even the source for the interview was a dead link) is a violation of WP:BLP. Robofish (talk) 16:19, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- Not sure if a blog can count as a source but I've seen this pop up in my FB newsfeed a few times over the last couple of days - http://bellejarblog.wordpress.com/2013/09/25/an-open-letter-to-david-gilmour/ TheTyrant (talk) 16:34, 27 September 2013 (UTC)TheTyrant
- Or perhaps this will work better - http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/holger-syme/holger-syme-david-gilmour_b_3996818.html TheTyrant (talk) 20:37, 27 September 2013 (UTC)TheTyrant
so this is left without something he's notable for? the transcript of the interview is online, and there are many mentions of the interview and his sexism out there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ann Burlingham (talk • contribs) 17:31, 6 February 2019 (UTC) perhaps link back to Keller's page, where he is linked, as are articles.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on David Gilmour (writer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100114130119/http://walrusmagazine.com/articles/2006.07-memoir-david-gilmour-my-life-with-tolstoy/ to http://www.walrusmagazine.com/articles/2006.07-memoir-david-gilmour-my-life-with-tolstoy/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:26, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Journalism articles
- Unknown-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles
- Start-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages