User talk:128.122.193.222: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
{{blanking}} |
Slatersteven (talk | contribs) Notification: listing of Kings of Shambhala at WP:Articles for deletion. |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Blanked IP talk}} |
|||
[[Wikipedia:Introduction|Welcome to Wikipedia]], the free encyclopedia! You don't have to [[Special:Userlogin|log in]] to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|benefits]], including: |
|||
== Nomination of [[:Kings of Shambhala]] for deletion == |
|||
*The use of a [[Wikipedia:Username|username]] of your choice |
|||
<div class="afd-notice"> |
|||
*The ability to view all your contributions via a "My contributions" link |
|||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article [[:Kings of Shambhala]] is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]]. |
|||
*Your own ''[[wikipedia:user page|user page]]'' |
|||
*Your own ''talk page'' which, if you choose, also allows users to send you messages without knowing your e-mail address |
|||
*The use of your own personal '''[[Wikipedia:Watchlist|watchlist]]''' to which you can add articles that interest you |
|||
*The ability to [[Wikipedia:How to rename a page|rename pages]] |
|||
*The ability to [[Special:Upload|upload images]] |
|||
*The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website |
|||
*The eligibility to become an [[Wikipedia:Administrators|administrator]] |
|||
*The right to be heard in votes and elections |
|||
*Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users. |
|||
The article will be discussed at '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kings of Shambhala]]''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. |
|||
We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and <big> '''[[Special:Userlogin|create an account]]'''</big>. Hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia as a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedian|Wikipedian]]! --[[User:Mel Etitis|Mel Etitis]] ([[User talk:Mel Etitis|<font color="green">Μελ Ετητης</font>)]] 20:56, 20 July 2005 (UTC) |
|||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> [[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 10:55, 16 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
==[[Christian Supremacy]]== |
|||
I'd like you to add citations of works that define this concept and distinguish it from both [[evangelicalism]] and [[triumphalism]]. Then we can be sure it's not [[original research]]. Thanks. [[User:Gazpacho|Gazpacho]] 20:10, 18 August 2005 (UTC) |
|||
It's closely related to the two pages it references, Dominionism and Christian Reconstructionism, but I don't understand how to provide citations if the page is already gone. Triumphalism is much more general, and Evangelicalism is not the same thing. Any simple google search of the term indicates that it is not a term I've coined, but one in widespread use among both the left and right. |
|||
==Blocked== |
|||
You have been temporarily [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires.<!-- Test5 (after-block warning) --> |
|||
Blocked by whom, and for what? |
|||
Reply: |
|||
Blocked by whom, and for what? |
|||
Hi. Blocked by me only for a short time. Someone on this proxy was creating a slew of titles relating to Buddhism with nothing more in them than category links. No text whatsoever. It was meant as a way to stem the tide of these entries long enough to clean them up. You should be OK to edit now. Sorry about the inconvenience. - [[User:Lucky 6.9|Lucky 6.9]] 19:00, 30 August 2005 (UTC) |
|||
-------- |
|||
That was me - didn't realize that was frowned upon. My thinking was - post them and they shall be fleshed out. Is this no good? Also, curious as to why the edits on the Sakyong's page were reverted. |
|||
Well, yes and no. You can certainly post short articles, but they have to have some content. In other words, write a good, short article and hang a stub notice, like the Buddhism stub. I reverted a couple of your edits without looking after seeing a couple of questionable ones, I'm afraid. If what you added was legitimate, by all means feel free to replace it. Take a look at [[Wikipedia:Manual of style]] to learn more. Also, please consider establishing a user account. It's a lot of fun! - [[User:Lucky 6.9|Lucky 6.9]] 19:42, 30 August 2005 (UTC) |
|||
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect]] it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been [[Wikipedia:How to spot vandalism|vandalised]], please [[Wikipedia:How to revert a page to an earlier version|revert]] it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please [[Wikipedia:How to edit a page|edit]] the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion policy]] for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!<!-- Template:Blanking1 (First level warning) --> -- [[User:JoanneB|JoanneB]] 15:51, 10 November 2005 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 10:55, 16 November 2024
Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.
Nomination of Kings of Shambhala for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kings of Shambhala until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.