Jump to content

2017 pro-jallikattu protests: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Reverted Visual edit
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Altered template type. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Whoop whoop pull up | Category:Jallikattu | #UCB_Category 1/6
 
(27 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Indian youth protests}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2020}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2020}}
{{Infobox civil conflict
{{Infobox civil conflict
|title = 2017 pro-jallikattu protests
|title = 2017 pro-jallikattu protests
|image = MarinaProtests1.jpg
|image = MarinaProtests1.jpg
|caption = Jallikattu protesters gathering at Chennai Marina Beach
|caption = Jallikattu protesters gathering at Chennai Marina Beach
|date = {{Start date|2017|01|08|df=y}}&nbsp;– {{End date|df=yes|2017|1|23}}<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.ndtv.com/tamil-nadu-news/jallikattu-protests-ended-time-to-enjoy-our-success-marina-beach-students-to-ndtv-1651731 |title=Jallikattu: Protests Over, We Got What We Wanted, Says Marina Beach Students To NDTV |work=NDTV |date=23 January 2017}}</ref><br />({{Age in years and days|2017|1|08|2017|1|23}})
|date = {{Start date|2017|01|08|df=y}}&nbsp;– {{End date|df=yes|2017|1|23}}<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.ndtv.com/tamil-nadu-news/jallikattu-protests-ended-time-to-enjoy-our-success-marina-beach-students-to-ndtv-1651731 |title=Jallikattu: Protests Over, We Got What We Wanted, Says Marina Beach Students To NDTV |work=NDTV |date=23 January 2017}}</ref><br />({{Age in years and days|2017|1|08|2017|1|23}})
Line 8: Line 9:
|causes = [[Supreme Court of India|Supreme Court]]'s ban against jallikattu
|causes = [[Supreme Court of India|Supreme Court]]'s ban against jallikattu
|goals = {{ubl|Revoke the ban on jallikattu|Ban PETA<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.timesnow.tv/india/article/explained-demands-made-by-jallikattu-supporters/54519 |title=Explained: Demands Made By Jallikattu Supporters |work=Times Now |date=22 January 2017}}</ref>}}
|goals = {{ubl|Revoke the ban on jallikattu|Ban PETA<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.timesnow.tv/india/article/explained-demands-made-by-jallikattu-supporters/54519 |title=Explained: Demands Made By Jallikattu Supporters |work=Times Now |date=22 January 2017}}</ref>}}
|methods = [[picketing]], [[sloganeering]], [[human chain (politics)|human chain]],<ref name="DNA Human chain">{{cite web|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-mumbai-s-tamils-form-human-chain-to-support-jallikattu-2293876|title=Mumbai’s Tamils form human chain to support Jallikattu – Latest News & Updates at Daily News & Analysis|date=19 January 2017|accessdate=19 January 2017}}</ref> [[silent protest]], [[hunger strike]], [[demonstration (protest)|demonstration]], [[internet activism]], [[candlelight vigil]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.indiatimes.com/news/india/tamilians-take-jallikattu-ban-as-an-insult-state-erupts-in-massive-protests-campaigns-to-remove-ban-intensify-269728.html|title= Jallikattu Ban Hurts Tamil Pride, State Erupts in Massive Protests, Celebrities Join In|publisher=indiatimes.com|accessdate=18 January 2017}}</ref>
|methods = [[picketing]], [[sloganeering]], [[human chain (politics)|human chain]],<ref name="DNA Human chain">{{cite web|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-mumbai-s-tamils-form-human-chain-to-support-jallikattu-2293876|title=Mumbai's Tamils form human chain to support Jallikattu – Latest News & Updates at Daily News & Analysis|date=19 January 2017|accessdate=19 January 2017}}</ref> [[silent protest]], [[hunger strike]], [[demonstration (protest)|demonstration]], [[internet activism]], [[candlelight vigil]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.indiatimes.com/news/india/tamilians-take-jallikattu-ban-as-an-insult-state-erupts-in-massive-protests-campaigns-to-remove-ban-intensify-269728.html|title= Jallikattu Ban Hurts Tamil Pride, State Erupts in Massive Protests, Celebrities Join In|date= 18 January 2017|publisher=indiatimes.com|accessdate=18 January 2017}}</ref>
|result = [[Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly|Tamil Nadu state legislation]] passed bill legalising jallikattu<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.timesnow.tv/india/article/jallikattu-now-legal-in-tamil-nadu-assembly-passes-bill-unanimously/54595 |title=Jallikattu Now Legal in Tamil Nadu, Assembly Passes Bill Unanimously |work=Times Now |date=23 January 2017}}</ref>
|result = [[Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly|Tamil Nadu state legislation]] passed bill legalising jallikattu<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.timesnow.tv/india/article/jallikattu-now-legal-in-tamil-nadu-assembly-passes-bill-unanimously/54595 |title=Jallikattu Now Legal in Tamil Nadu, Assembly Passes Bill Unanimously |work=Times Now |date=23 January 2017}}</ref>
|howmany1 = > 1 million<ref name="mil">{{cite news|last1=Soutik|first1=Biswas|title=Why India bull-taming protest may not be just about bulls|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-38687248|accessdate=21 January 2017|work=[[BBC News]]|date=20 January 2017|location=[[India]]|quote=:more than a million people are estimated to have protested across Tamil Nadu on Friday}}</ref>
|howmany1 = > 1 million<ref name="mil">{{cite news|last1=Soutik|first1=Biswas|title=Why India bull-taming protest may not be just about bulls|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-38687248|accessdate=21 January 2017|work=[[BBC News]]|date=20 January 2017|location=[[India]]|quote=:more than a million people are estimated to have protested across Tamil Nadu on Friday}}</ref>
Line 14: Line 15:
|injuries=> 60<ref name="mil-2">{{cite news|last1=Pushpa|first1=Narayan|title=Jallikattu protests: 60 admitted to govt hospitals in Chennai|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/jallikattu-protests-60-admitted-to-govt-hospitals-in-chennai/articleshow/56733438.cms|accessdate=23 January 2017|work=[[Times of India News]]|date=23 January 2017}} Around 60 people, including 33 policemen, were admitted to state-run hospitals as pro-jallikattu protests turned violent in Chennai.</ref>}}
|injuries=> 60<ref name="mil-2">{{cite news|last1=Pushpa|first1=Narayan|title=Jallikattu protests: 60 admitted to govt hospitals in Chennai|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/jallikattu-protests-60-admitted-to-govt-hospitals-in-chennai/articleshow/56733438.cms|accessdate=23 January 2017|work=[[Times of India News]]|date=23 January 2017}} Around 60 people, including 33 policemen, were admitted to state-run hospitals as pro-jallikattu protests turned violent in Chennai.</ref>}}


The '''2017 pro-jallikattu protests''', also known as the '''pro-jallikattu movement''', were leaderless [[Apoliticism|apolitical]] youth [[Protest|protests]] which took place in January 2017 in large groups in several locations across the Indian state of [[Tamil Nadu]]. Some sporadic smaller protests also took place across India<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/tamil-lawyers-students-protest-against-jallikattu-ban-4482021/|title=Tamil lawyers, students protest against Jallikattu ban in Delhi|date=19 January 2017|newspaper=The Indian Express|language=en|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> as well as overseas.<ref>{{Citation|last=Puthiya Thalaimurai TV|title=Overseas support for Jallikattu as Tamils in London stage protests near the Indian embassy|date=17 January 2017|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-Xsl7WDpb8|type=YouTube video|accessdate=20 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thenewsminute.com/article/london-madurai-and-beyond-tamilians-protest-against-jallikattu-ban-55897|title=From London to Madurai and beyond: Tamilians protest against jallikattu ban|date=18 January 2017|newspaper=The News Minute|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> The chief motivation of the protest was against the [[Supreme Court of India|Supreme Court]]'s order to ban [[jallikattu]] (occasionally also known as ''sallikattu'', ''eru taluval and'' ''manju virattu''),<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/Governor-clears-ordinance-on-%E2%80%98jallikattu%E2%80%99/article17074093.ece|title=Governor clears ordinance on 'jallikattu'|last=Ramakrishnan|first=T.|newspaper=The Hindu|access-date=2017-02-23|language=en}}</ref> a traditional Tamil bull taming sport, which is held during [[Thai Pongal|Pongal]], a harvest festival in the state of Tamil Nadu, India.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/01/protests-flare-southern-india-jallikattu-ban-170119111658879.html|title=Protests flare in southern India over Jallikattu ban|website=www.aljazeera.com|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> The sport is conducted annually on the second day of the [[Tamil calendar|Tamil month Thai]]. The sport was banned by the Supreme Court in a decision citing [[cruelty to animals]] based on a lawsuit filed by the [[animal rights]] group [[People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals]] (PETA),<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/PETA-Jallikattu-stay-%E2%80%98partial-victory%E2%80%99-for-bulls/article13995899.ece|title=PETA: Jallikattu stay 'partial victory' for bulls|last=PTI|newspaper=The Hindu|access-date=2017-02-23|language=en}}</ref> which asserted that it violates the [[Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act]] (PCA).<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/supreme-court-turns-down-plea-to-allow-bull-taming-sport-jallikattu-before-pongal/articleshow/56494779.cms|title=Supreme Court turns down plea to allow bull-taming sport Jallikattu before Pongal|date=12 January 2017|newspaper=The Times of India|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref>
The '''2017 pro-jallikattu protests''', also known as the '''pro-jallikattu movement''', were leaderless [[Apoliticism|apolitical]] youth [[protest]]s which took place in January 2017 in large groups in several locations across the Indian state of [[Tamil Nadu]]. Some sporadic smaller protests also took place across India<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/tamil-lawyers-students-protest-against-jallikattu-ban-4482021/|title=Tamil lawyers, students protest against Jallikattu ban in Delhi|date=19 January 2017|newspaper=The Indian Express|language=en|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> as well as overseas.<ref>{{Citation|title=Overseas support for Jallikattu as Tamils in London stage protests near the Indian embassy|date=17 January 2017|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-Xsl7WDpb8|type=YouTube video|accessdate=20 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thenewsminute.com/article/london-madurai-and-beyond-tamilians-protest-against-jallikattu-ban-55897|title=From London to Madurai and beyond: Tamilians protest against jallikattu ban|date=18 January 2017|newspaper=The News Minute|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> The chief motivation of the protest was against the [[Supreme Court of India|Supreme Court]]'s order to ban [[jallikattu]] (occasionally also known as ''sallikattu'', ''eru taluval and'' ''manju virattu''),<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/Governor-clears-ordinance-on-%E2%80%98jallikattu%E2%80%99/article17074093.ece|title=Governor clears ordinance on 'jallikattu'|last=Ramakrishnan|first=T.|newspaper=The Hindu|access-date=2017-02-23|language=en}}</ref> a traditional Tamil bull taming sport, which is held during [[Thai Pongal|Pongal]], a harvest festival in the state of Tamil Nadu, India.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/01/protests-flare-southern-india-jallikattu-ban-170119111658879.html|title=Protests flare in southern India over Jallikattu ban|website=www.aljazeera.com|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> The sport is conducted annually on the second day of the [[Tamil calendar|Tamil month Thai]]. The sport was banned by the Supreme Court in a decision citing [[cruelty to animals]] based on a lawsuit filed by the [[animal rights]] group [[People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals]] (PETA),<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/PETA-Jallikattu-stay-%E2%80%98partial-victory%E2%80%99-for-bulls/article13995899.ece|title=PETA: Jallikattu stay 'partial victory' for bulls|newspaper=The Hindu|access-date=2017-02-23|language=en}}</ref> which asserted that it violates the [[Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act]] (PCA).<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/supreme-court-turns-down-plea-to-allow-bull-taming-sport-jallikattu-before-pongal/articleshow/56494779.cms|title=Supreme Court turns down plea to allow bull-taming sport Jallikattu before Pongal|date=12 January 2017|newspaper=The Times of India|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref>


The first large protests occurred on 8 January 2017, when several groups, organised largely via social media, conducted a protest at the [[Marina beach]] in Chennai to revoke the ban on jallikattu which was imposed in 2014. These groups also demanded that PETA be banned from India.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.firstpost.com/india/jallikattu-supporters-organise-rally-in-chennai-for-seeking-permission-to-hold-bull-taming-sport-3194152.html|title=Jallikattu: Supporters organise rally in Chennai for seeking permission to hold bull-taming sport|date=8 January 2017|accessdate=19 January 2017}}</ref> The protests soon gained momentum and spread all over Tamil Nadu.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/jallikattu-uprising-sc-allows-centres-request-to-not-pass-judgement-on-the-issue-for-a-week-4483061/|title=Jallikattu protest: SC allows Centre’s request to not pass judgment for a week|date=20 January 2017|newspaper=The Indian Express|language=en|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> After several days of protests, jallikattu was finally legalised locally on 23 January when the [[Government of Tamil Nadu]] passed a bill to amend the PCA Act.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/jallikattu-tamil-nadu-assembly-passes-bill-to-amend-pca-act/articleshow/56738068.cms|title=Jallikattu: Tamil Nadu assembly passes bill to amend PCA Act |date=23 January 2017 |work=The Times of India |author=B Sivakumar}}</ref> As the legalisation is not [[Law of India|Indian federal law]], but rather state law, there is concern from Indian legal experts that jallikattu could be banned once again by the Supreme Court.<ref name=":11" /><ref name=":12" />
The first large protests occurred on 8 January 2017, when several groups, organised largely via social media, conducted a protest at the [[Marina beach]] in Chennai to revoke the ban on jallikattu which was imposed in 2014. These groups also demanded that PETA be banned from India.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.firstpost.com/india/jallikattu-supporters-organise-rally-in-chennai-for-seeking-permission-to-hold-bull-taming-sport-3194152.html|title=Jallikattu: Supporters organise rally in Chennai for seeking permission to hold bull-taming sport|date=8 January 2017|accessdate=19 January 2017}}</ref> The protests soon gained momentum and spread all over Tamil Nadu.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/jallikattu-uprising-sc-allows-centres-request-to-not-pass-judgement-on-the-issue-for-a-week-4483061/|title=Jallikattu protest: SC allows Centre's request to not pass judgment for a week|date=20 January 2017|newspaper=The Indian Express|language=en|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> After several days of protests, jallikattu was finally legalised locally on 23 January when the [[Government of Tamil Nadu]] passed a bill to amend the PCA Act.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/jallikattu-tamil-nadu-assembly-passes-bill-to-amend-pca-act/articleshow/56738068.cms|title=Jallikattu: Tamil Nadu assembly passes bill to amend PCA Act |date=23 January 2017 |work=The Times of India |author=B Sivakumar}}</ref> As the legalisation is not [[Law of India|Indian federal law]], but rather state law, there is concern from Indian legal experts that jallikattu could be banned once again by the Supreme Court.<ref name=":11" /><ref name=":12" />


The largely peaceful nature of the protests received praise from all over the country and inspired the legalisation movements of several other Indian states' traditional outlawed celebrations.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.india.com/news/india/jallikattu-ban-protests-in-chennai-calm-peaceful-clean-leave-many-impressed-1768260/ |title=Jallikattu ban protests in Chennai calm, peaceful, clean; leave many impressed |date=19 January 2017 |work=India.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/jallikattu-allowed-other-states-ramp-up-pressure-for-their-outlawed-sports/story-lg5HbSYpzyokX9BEH3tCDK.html |title=Jallikattu 'legal', other states ramp up pressure for their outlawed sports |date=23 January 2017 |work=Hindusthan Times}}</ref> Despite violence on 23 January, this perception continued after the [[Tamil Nadu Police]]<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/%E2%80%98Police-sexually-assaulted-protesting-women%E2%80%99/article16974778.ece|title=Police sexually assaulted protesting women|last=Correspondent|first=Special|newspaper=The Hindu|access-date=2017-02-23|language=en}}</ref> reported that the violence was caused by "anti-social elements" co-opting the protest, and not the student protesters themselves.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ndtv.com/tamil-nadu-news/young-blood-is-boiling-today-jallikattu-protest-at-marina-beach-1651651|title=Jallikattu: 'Anti-National Elements', Not Students, Causing Chennai Violence, Say Cops|accessdate=23 February 2017}}</ref>{{vague|date=January 2017|reason=Lacks context.}}<ref>{{cite news|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/jallikattu-protest-turns-violent-after-police-eviction/articleshow/56730155.cms|title=Jallikattu protest turns violent after police eviction|date=23 January 2017|work=The Economic Times}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/jallikattu-protest-violence-breaks-out-in-chennai-other-parts-of-tamil-nadu/articleshow/56730531.cms|title=Jallikattu protest: Violence breaks out in Chennai, other parts of Tamil Nadu|date=23 January 2017|work=The Times of India}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/jallikattu-protesters-evicted-by-tamil-nadu-police-from-marina-beach-other-places/story-x4wfgwEj6qxybPHwfnYGbK.html|title=Protest turns violent on Chennai’s Marina Beach; vehicles torched, petrol bombs lobbed|date=23 January 2017|work=Hindusthan Times}}</ref> The movement has been described as a symbol for Tamil pride and has largely been compared to the [[anti-Hindi agitations of Tamil Nadu]] and dubbed by many as 'Thai Puratchi'.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/protests-for-jallikattu-turn-mass-pageant-of-tamil-pride/articleshow/56690347.cms |title=Protests for jallikattu turn mass pageant of Tamil pride |date=20 January 2017 |work=The Times of India}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.india.com/news/india/jallikattu-protests-and-1965-anti-hindi-riots-similar-at-face-value-different-in-objective-1769157/ |title=Jallikattu protests and 1965 Anti-Hindi riots: Similar at face value, different in objective |date=19 January 2017 |work=India.com |author=Sohit Mishra}}</ref> Even before this massive protest panning out, on 27.12.2016 Senthamizhan Seeman, the Chief Coordinator of Naam Tamilar Katchi started protest in Alankanallur. Later, On 11 January 2017, in the area adjacent to the Thiruvanthipuram hill in Cuddalore, Naam Tamilar Katchi cadres conducted jallikattu despite the ban. On the morning of 17 January 2017, the police arrested and imprisoned the youths involved in the tenth day of the Alankanallur hunger strike. Following this, the news spread like wildfire in the neighboring towns and people spontaneously took part in the struggle. Following this, the youth gathered at Marina Beach. That day marked as the first day of the "Thai Puratchi".
The largely peaceful nature of the protests received praise from all over the country and inspired the legalisation movements of several other Indian states' traditional outlawed celebrations.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.india.com/news/india/jallikattu-ban-protests-in-chennai-calm-peaceful-clean-leave-many-impressed-1768260/ |title=Jallikattu ban protests in Chennai calm, peaceful, clean; leave many impressed |date=19 January 2017 |work=India.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/jallikattu-allowed-other-states-ramp-up-pressure-for-their-outlawed-sports/story-lg5HbSYpzyokX9BEH3tCDK.html |title=Jallikattu 'legal', other states ramp up pressure for their outlawed sports |date=23 January 2017 |work=Hindusthan Times}}</ref> Despite violence on 23 January, this perception continued after the [[Tamil Nadu Police]]<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/%E2%80%98Police-sexually-assaulted-protesting-women%E2%80%99/article16974778.ece|title=Police sexually assaulted protesting women|newspaper=The Hindu|access-date=2017-02-23|language=en}}</ref> reported that the violence was caused by "anti-social elements" co-opting the protest, and not the student protesters themselves.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ndtv.com/tamil-nadu-news/young-blood-is-boiling-today-jallikattu-protest-at-marina-beach-1651651|title=Jallikattu: 'Anti-National Elements', Not Students, Causing Chennai Violence, Say Cops|accessdate=23 February 2017}}</ref>{{vague|date=January 2017|reason=Lacks context.}}<ref>{{cite news|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/jallikattu-protest-turns-violent-after-police-eviction/articleshow/56730155.cms|title=Jallikattu protest turns violent after police eviction|date=23 January 2017|work=The Economic Times}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/jallikattu-protest-violence-breaks-out-in-chennai-other-parts-of-tamil-nadu/articleshow/56730531.cms|title=Jallikattu protest: Violence breaks out in Chennai, other parts of Tamil Nadu|date=23 January 2017|work=The Times of India}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/jallikattu-protesters-evicted-by-tamil-nadu-police-from-marina-beach-other-places/story-x4wfgwEj6qxybPHwfnYGbK.html|title=Protest turns violent on Chennai's Marina Beach; vehicles torched, petrol bombs lobbed|date=23 January 2017|work=Hindusthan Times}}</ref> The movement has been described as a symbol for Tamil pride and has largely been compared to the [[anti-Hindi agitations of Tamil Nadu]] and dubbed by many as 'Thai Puratchi'.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/protests-for-jallikattu-turn-mass-pageant-of-tamil-pride/articleshow/56690347.cms |title=Protests for jallikattu turn mass pageant of Tamil pride |date=20 January 2017 |work=The Times of India}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.india.com/news/india/jallikattu-protests-and-1965-anti-hindi-riots-similar-at-face-value-different-in-objective-1769157/ |title=Jallikattu protests and 1965 Anti-Hindi riots: Similar at face value, different in objective |date=19 January 2017 |work=India.com |author=Sohit Mishra}}</ref>


== Background ==
On 21 January 2017, Jallikattu sport was conducted by the Naam Tamilar Katchi at Kidarippatti near Melur. Senthamizhan Seeman also presented prizes to the winners of the competition.
{{Main|Jallikattu}}

Jallikattu is a traditional bull taming event wherein a berserk bull is released into a crowd, and the participants of the crowd individually attempt to grab and hold on to the bull's hump for a determined distance, a determined time, or with the goal of removing a packet of money tied to the bull's horns.<ref>{{cite news |author=Salim David |date=20 January 2017 |title=View: Blanket ban on Jallikattu would be tantamount to banning all motor cars |url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/view-blanket-ban-on-jallikattu-would-be-tantamount-to-banning-all-motor-cars/articleshow/56681598.cms |work=The Economic Times}}</ref> The sport, which is considered to be 2500–10,000 years old,<ref>{{cite news |author=Vidya Venkat |date=14 January 2017 |title=Missing the bull's eye |url=http://www.thehindu.com/thread/arts-culture-society/Missing-the-bulls-eye/article17040148.ece |work=The Hindu}}</ref> is usually held during [[Thai Pongal]] across several locations in [[Tamil Nadu]],<ref>{{cite news |author=Arun Janardhanan |date=20 January 2017 |title=Taking Jallikattu bull by the horns: Protests in TN and the many legal twists and turns |url=http://indianexpress.com/article/explained/jallikattu-protests-in-tamil-nadu-and-the-many-legal-twists-and-turns-4482563/ |work=The Indian Express}}</ref> with the primary event being held in [[Alanganallur]].<ref>{{cite news |date=23 January 2017 |title=Jallikattu claims two lives in TN |url=http://www.deccanherald.com/content/592832/jallikattu-claims-two-lives-tn.html |work=Deccan Herald}}</ref> During the event, injuries or even death often occur to participants.<ref>{{Cite news |title=What Is Jallikattu? All You need To Know About Tamil Nadu's Bull-Taming Tradition |url=http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/what-is-jallikattu-1650547 |access-date=20 January 2017 |newspaper=NDTV.com}}</ref> While bull breeders contend that the participating bulls are treated well,<ref name=":7">{{Cite news |last=Sushmitha |first=Ramakrishnan |date=21 January 2017 |title=Does Jallikattu really help the native breeds? |url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil-nadu/2017/jan/21/does-jallikattu-really-help-the-native-breeds-1561910--1.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170123165426/http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil-nadu/2017/jan/21/does-jallikattu-really-help-the-native-breeds-1561910--1.html |archive-date=23 January 2017 |access-date=22 January 2017 |newspaper=The New Indian Express}}</ref> PETA asserts its investigators found that the bulls suffers [[Cruelty to animals|cruel treatment]], from having their tails twisted, being stabbed, punched and jumped on.<ref name=":3">{{Cite news |date=7 May 2014 |title=Supreme Court Bans Jallikattu, Bull Races and Bullfights |url=http://www.petaindia.com/blog/sc-bans-jallikattu-bull-races-fights/ |access-date=20 January 2017 |newspaper=PETA India |language=en-US}}</ref> India's [[Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act]] (PCAA) outlaws animal cruelty, and sets up the punishment offenders can expect to receive. The Madras High Court was the first to rule that jallikattu was not allowable under the PCAA in 2006.<ref>{{cite web |last=Malviya |first=Amit |date=19 January 2017 |title=Jallikattu ban: BJP backs people of Tamil Nadu, blames UPA for depriving state of traditional sport |url=https://www.firstpost.com/politics/jallikattu-ban-bjp-backs-people-of-tamil-nadu-blames-upa-for-depriving-state-of-traditional-sport-3211794.html |accessdate=2020-09-20 |website=[[Firstpost]]}}</ref> However, traditional sports like jallikattu have since then always been allowed through various legal and extralegal means, the most recent of which is the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Jallikattu Act No 27, passed by the [[Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly]] and signed into law in 2009.<ref name=":3" />

In January 2011, [[Hema Malini]] appealed to the [[Ministry of Environment and Forests]] (MoE) to ban Jallikatu, and it responded by issuing a notification that bulls may no longer be used as performing animals in India, adding it to a list which previously included only bears, monkeys, tigers, panthers and lions.<ref>{{Cite news |date=12 January 2017 |title=Timeline: Jallikattu Ban And Controversy |url=http://www.news18.com/news/india/timeline-jallikattu-ban-and-controversy-1334827.html |access-date=20 January 2017 |newspaper=News18}}</ref> Armed with this, in April 2011, PETA announced that it would challenge the 2009 Tamil Nadu law as [[unconstitutional]], as it now conflicts with the [[Law of India|Indian federal law]].<ref>{{Cite news |date=27 April 2011 |title=PETA Goes to Supreme Court for Jallikattu Ban |url=http://www.petaindia.com/blog/peta-goes-supreme-court-jallikattu-ban/ |access-date=20 January 2017 |newspaper=PETA India |language=en-US}}</ref> After three years in court, on 7 May 2014, PETA, represented by Raj Panjwani, along with the [[Animal Welfare Board of India]] (AWBI), striking down the 2009 Tamil Nadu law.<ref name=":3" /> In defiance of the ban, citizens of Tamil Nadu attempted to carry out the tradition on 18 January 2015, but police arrested forty six people and allowed the animals to go free.<ref>{{Cite news |date=18 January 2015 |title=46 arrested for violating Jallikattu ban |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/46-arrested-for-violating-jallikattu-ban-in-salem-district-of-tamil-nadu/article6799135.ece |access-date=20 January 2017 |newspaper=The Hindu |language=en}}</ref>

In preparation for the 2016 jallikattu season, [[Government of India|the Centre]] reversed its earlier decision and on 7 January 2016 MoE once again removed bulls from the list of banned performing animals.<ref>{{Cite news |date=8 January 2016 |title=Jallikattu: India lifts ban on bullfighting in Tamil Nadu |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-35259793 |access-date=20 January 2017 |newspaper=BBC News |language=en-GB}}</ref> Justices [[Dipak Misra]] and [[Rohinton Fali Nariman]] were highly critical of this reaction, and were quoted by ''[[The Hindu]]'' as stating jointly:<ref name=":9">{{Cite news |title=SC questions Centre's notification supporting 'jallikattu' |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/SC-questions-Centre%E2%80%99s-notification-supporting-%E2%80%98jallikattu%E2%80%99/article16737432.ece |access-date=20 January 2017 |newspaper=The Hindu |language=en}}</ref> "How can you negate our judgment banning jallikattu by coming up with the January 2016 notification allowing bulls to participate in the sport again? [...] We cannot import [[Roman gladiator]]-type sport here." The Supreme Court issued a stay order on 12 January 2016, effectively banning the sport just five days after the Centre unbanned it.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Rebello |first=Lara |date=12 January 2016 |title=India: Supreme Court puts a stay on Jallikattu bull taming sport |url=http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/india-supreme-court-issues-stay-order-jallikattu-bull-taming-sport-1537441 |access-date=20 January 2017 |newspaper=International Business Times UK}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=14 January 2016 |title=Supreme Court upholds ban on Jallikattu |url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-supreme-court-upholds-ban-on-jallikattu-2165531 |access-date=20 January 2017 |newspaper=DNA |language=en-US}}</ref> With the police on their side this time, however, jallikattu went ahead anyway, and thousands gathered to watch bull races and the main sport.<ref>{{Cite news |date=20 January 2016 |title=Over 35 injured as building collapses during Jallikattu |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/andhra-pradesh/Over-35-injured-as-building-collapses-during-Jallikattu/article14009667.ece |access-date=20 January 2017 |newspaper=The Hindu |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Akbar |first=Syed |date=16 January 2016 |title=Despite SC ban, 'Jallikattu' held in Andhra Pradesh villages |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Despite-SC-ban-Jallikattu-held-in-Andhra-Pradesh-villages/articleshow/50603346.cms |access-date=20 January 2017 |newspaper=The Times of India}}</ref>

In preparation for the 2017 season, once again multiple petitions were filed to try to get the Supreme Court to reconsider; and once again they were all denied, including a petition attempting to argue a [[religious freedom]] angle.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Rajagopal |first=Krishnadas |date=2 December 2016 |title=Apex court refuses to lift ban on jallikattu |url=http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/Apex-court-refuses-to-lift-ban-on-jallikattu/article16460630.ece |access-date=20 January 2017 |newspaper=The Hindu |language=en}}</ref> The Supreme Court once again sparred with the Centre, who was trying to get it unbanned as it was a 5,000-year-old cultural tradition of the Tamil people, but the court responded simply "In 1899, ten thousand girls below 12 years of age were married. Should we allow it today because it was a tradition at that time?" and rejected the petition.<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Vaidyanathan |first1=A. |last2=Shukla |first2=Shuchi |date=26 July 2016 |title=Jallikattu 5000-Years-Old, So What? Supreme Court's Sharp Remarks on Bull Fest |url=http://www.ndtv.com/tamil-nadu-news/jallikattu-5000-years-old-so-what-supreme-courts-sharp-remarks-on-bull-fest-1436227 |access-date=20 January 2017 |newspaper=NDTV.com}}</ref> For the 2017 season, political tension was high, perhaps sparking the massive protest: people blamed the [[AIADMK]] and [[Bharatiya Janata Party|BJP]] political parties for failing to reverse the ban during the last three years. Once again, citizens flouted the Supreme Court, and jallikattu went ahead despite its legal status.<ref name=":5" /> With an uncooperative judiciary, the other branches of government began work on a law which would override the court's decision: on 19 January 2017, [[prime minister of India]] [[Narendra Modi]] vowed to support Tamil Nadu but declined to give further details, claiming that he could not as the case was currently ''[[sub judice]]''.<ref>{{Cite news |title=Modi says jallikattu is sub-judice |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/Modi-says-jallikattu-is-sub-judice/article17059806.ece |access-date=19 January 2017 |newspaper=The Hindu |language=en}}</ref> In an interview, former Supreme Court justice [[Markandey Katju]] observed that laws can be changed even when the matter is in court as was done for the act that abolished ''[[zamindari]]'' in the 1950s when the [[Jawaharlal Nehru|Nehru]] government removed the [[right to property]] as a [[fundamental right]].<ref>{{Cite news |date=18 January 2017 |title=Centre need not wait for SC order, can pass ordinance on jallikattu: Katju to TNM |url=http://www.thenewsminute.com/article/centre-need-not-wait-sc-order-can-pass-ordinance-jallikattu-katju-tnm-55930 |access-date=19 January 2017 |newspaper=The News Minute}}</ref>

=== Support ===
Jallikattu is cited as one of the last available ways to promote and preserve<ref name="Natarajan">{{Cite news |last=Natarajan |first=Swaminathan |date=19 July 2016 |title=Jallikattu: Why India bullfighting ban 'threatens native breeds' |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-36798500 |access-date=21 January 2017 |newspaper=BBC News |language=en-GB}}</ref><ref name=":6">{{cite web |last=Anugula |first=Himakiran |title=Banning Jallikattu Will Decimate India's Indigenous Cattle Breeds – The Wire |url=https://thewire.in/19157/banning-jallikattu-will-decimate-indias-indigenous-cattle-breeds/ |access-date=21 January 2017 |website=thewire.in |language=en-GB}}</ref> the native livestock because the other uses of native breeds such as ploughing, breeding via mating and milk is on decline due to advancement in mechanization by tractors, improvement in artificial insemination and hybrid Jersey cows respectively.<ref name=":6" /> Native breed activists claim that Tamil Nadu had over one million [[Kangayam cattle|Kangayam bulls]] in 1990 and that the population has fallen to 15,000 by the 2010s.<ref name="Natarajan" /><ref name=":6" /> Minor protests were initiated by cattle rights activists and farmers. Music videos, such as "Takkaru Takkaru" by [[Hiphop Tamizha]], and on Facebook videos to talk about jallikattu and its benefits inspired the protestors.<ref>{{Cite news |date=19 January 2017 |title=Meet the campaigners behind the Jallikattu uprising |url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/jallikattu-warriors-meet-the-hi-tech-brains-behind-chennai-protests/story-FEhufoLh0bpRkkZORLn9VJ.html |accessdate=20 January 2017 |newspaper=hindustantimes.com/ |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Senaapathy Kangayam Cattle Research Foundation – About Us |url=https://www.kangayambull.com/about-us/about-skcrf/ |accessdate=19 January 2017 |website=www.kangayambull.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Rao |first=Subha J |title=BULL Stop! |url=http://www.thehindu.com/features/metroplus/bull-stop/article5609632.ece |accessdate=20 January 2017 |newspaper=The Hindu |language=en}}</ref> There were also claims that the indigenous cattle bulls are critically endangered in Tamil Nadu and banning jallikattu will have the adverse effect of wiping them out completely.<ref>{{Citation |last=Jalli Kattu |title=jallikattu Karthikeya sivasenathipathi speech |date=26 July 2016 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tByxohxx96s |accessdate=19 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |title=Interview with Hip Hop Tamizha 'Aadhi' about Jallikattu |date=11 January 2017 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiPq6f6CVQA |accessdate=19 January 2017}}</ref> According to pro-jallikattu activists, jallikattu is not just a sport that is deeply entrenched in Tamil culture, but it has also inadvertently served as a scientific method of breeding cattle.{{clarify|date=January 2017|reason=This is vague. How exactly does the science work? What makes jallikattu, a sport where people grab a bull's hump and ride it, an effective way to determine the quality of offspring? What were the controls? What scientific experimentations support this conclusion?}} This view is held among a majority of jallikattu supporters.<ref>{{cite web |title=Sun TV – இணைய செயற்பாட்டாளர் ராஜ்மோகன் ஜல்லிக்கட்டு பற்றிய... |url=https://www.facebook.com/SunTv/videos/809775729161333/ |accessdate=21 January 2017 |website=www.facebook.com |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |title=Jallikattu is not cruelty but a breeding process, say its proponents |url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/jallikattu-bull-taming-sport-breeding-process/1/858086.html |accessdate=21 January 2017}}</ref> The protest is aimed at revival of the native humped bull, called the [[zebu]]. The [[Kangayam cattle|Tamil Nadu breed]] of zebu is unique to India and has several advantages compared to European varieties of cattle such as the [[Holstein Friesian cattle|Holstein cow]]. The native breeds are rich in the A2 variety of beta [[casein protein]] which aides easy [[digestion]] whereas milk from European [[Cattle|''Bos taurus'']] contain the A1 variant of the beta casein protein which is related to allergies and some serious health conditions.<ref name=":1">{{Cite news |title=The deshi cow milk jinx |url=http://www.downtoearth.org.in/blog/the-deshi-cow-milk-jinx-45095 |access-date=21 January 2017 |language=en}}</ref> The Holstein breeds found their way into India as a result of [[Operation Flood]] of late 1960s through cross breeding to increase the low milk yield of native breeds. As the [[Jersey cow]] can yield nine times the quantity of milk as a zebu in the same period, there is concern among protesters that without jallikattu providing an [[economic incentive]] for the breeding of zebu, the breed will become [[Rare breed (agriculture)|endangered]] and eventually [[extinct]].<ref name=":7" /> PETA disputes the allegation that outlawing jallikattu would lead to a loss of the Tamil Nadu zebu, stating that the bulls can still be used as [[Stud (animal)|studs]] regardless of whether jallikattu is legal or not.<ref name=":8">{{Cite news |author1=Poorva Joshipura; CEO PETA India |date=21 July 2016 |title=Clearing Up All The Bull Around Jallikattu |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.in/poorva-joshipura/clearing-up-all-the-bull-around-jallikattu/ |accessdate=20 January 2017 |newspaper=Huffington Post India}}</ref>

Support from various groups, including film actors, politicians, cricketers and other sportsmen, social activists, and authors. [[Raghava Lawrence]], actor [[Silambarasan]], director [[V. Gowthaman]], [[Seeman]], [[Samuthirakani]], [[Ameer (director)|Ameer]], [[RJ Balaji]], [[Aari (actor)|Aari]], [[Mansoor Ali Khan (actor)|Mansoor Ali Khan]] and [[G. V. Prakash Kumar]] took part actively during the protests. Spiritual leaders like [[Sri Sri Ravi Shankar]], and [[Jaggi Vasudev|Sadhuguru Jaggi Vasudev]]<ref name=":0">{{Cite news |title=For Jallikattu, AR Rahman To Fast, Sri Sri Ravi Shankar And Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudeva Say Ban Must End |url=http://www.ndtv.com/tamil-nadu-news/for-jallikattu-ar-rahman-will-fast-sri-sri-ravi-shankar-and-sadhuguru-jaggi-vasudeva-lend-support-1650625 |access-date=20 January 2017 |newspaper=NDTV.com}}</ref> also spoke in support of the sport.<ref>{{Cite news |date=19 January 2017 |title=Jallikattu: Tamil Nadu celebrities step forward, offer support on social media |url=http://www.firstpost.com/india/jallikattu-tamil-nadu-celebrities-step-forward-offer-support-on-social-media-3211472.html |access-date=20 January 2017 |newspaper=Firstpost |language=en-US}}</ref> The protestors rejected any attempt for leadership by politicians and celebrities and wished to remain a leaderless mass movement.

On 19 January 2017, film composer [[A. R. Rahman]] announced that he will observe a day-long fast in support of the protesters, and for 'Tamil Nadu's spirit'.<ref name=":0" />

=== Opposition ===
The main opposition of jallikattu comes from the Indian branch of the international non-governmental organization [[People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals]] (PETA). PETA's opposition is also shared by the Animal Welfare Board of India (AWBI), [[Federation of Indian Animal Protection Organisations]] and Compassion Unlimited Plus Action (CUPA).<ref>{{Cite news |title=Supreme Court to examine plea against Tamil Nadu's law on Jallikattu |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/supreme-court-to-examine-plea-against-tamil-nadus-law-on-jallikattu/articleshow/56784708.cms? |access-date=28 January 2017 |newspaper=The Times of India}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Banned, but #StillNotSafe |url=http://www.fiapo.org/our-campaigns/save-the-bulls-support-the-ban/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170117203915/http://www.fiapo.org/our-campaigns/save-the-bulls-support-the-ban/ |archive-date=17 January 2017 |access-date=22 January 2017 |website=FIAPO |language=en-US |df=dmy-all}}</ref> Judges of the Supreme Court of India have likewise criticized the Indian Central Government's support of jallikattu just because it is a tradition and have voiced their opposition of it.<ref name=":9" /> The Supreme has held that the sport is inherently cruel in nature and this deprives the animal of its basic right to live without subject to fear and torture. The judgement also clarifies that the sport is neither religious ritual nor an essential sport for the Tamil community as the sport is played only in few districts of central Tamil Nadu and not in all districts. The sport has claimed multiple lives including those of the tamers, onlookers and the police. The first ban on jallikattu was a result of a case filed by the father of a tamer who lost his life in the event.

[[People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals|PETA]] denies that ending the jallikattu event will lead to the loss of the native bull, and has pointed out that bulls can be used as studs regardless of whether or not they are engaged in jallikattu. Furthermore, PETA claims that [[veterinarians]] can determine which bulls are healthiest with far more scientific rigor than jallikattu can.<ref name=":8" />


== Timeline ==
== Timeline ==
Line 29: Line 51:
Sporadic demonstrations began on 4 January,<ref>{{cite news|title=AIADMK should take responsibility for continuous ban on jallikattu|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/aiadmk-should-take-responsibility-for-continuous-ban-on-jallikattu/articleshow/56322037.cms|accessdate=22 January 2017|work=The Times of India|publisher=Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd|date=4 January 2017}}</ref> but mass protests did not begin until two weeks later.
Sporadic demonstrations began on 4 January,<ref>{{cite news|title=AIADMK should take responsibility for continuous ban on jallikattu|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/aiadmk-should-take-responsibility-for-continuous-ban-on-jallikattu/articleshow/56322037.cms|accessdate=22 January 2017|work=The Times of India|publisher=Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd|date=4 January 2017}}</ref> but mass protests did not begin until two weeks later.


On 16 January 2017, villagers of Alanganallur protested at [[Alanganallur]] '''Vaadi vaasal''<nowiki/>' – The Arena, the place known for the jallikattu sport – on that date, the sport was also practiced in defiance of the ban.<ref name=":5">{{Cite news|url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil-nadu/2017/jan/16/despite-sc-ban-jallikattu-bulls-released-at-alanganallur-1560115.html|title=Despite SC ban, jallikattu bulls released at Alanganallur|newspaper=The New Indian Express|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> After a day long protest, police arrested the protesters numbering around 200<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thenewsminute.com/article/police-clear-alanganallur-arena-220-protesters-arrested-6am-after-night-long-protests-55817|title=Police clear up Alanganallur arena, 220 protesters detained at 6am after night-long protests|date=17 January 2017|newspaper=The News Minute|access-date=21 January 2017}}</ref> in [[Madurai]]. On 17 January 2017, In support of the arrested, Students gathered in [[Marina Beach]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/chennai/2017/jan/18/chennais-marina-beach-turns-into-tahrir-square-for-jallikattu-democracy-1560841.html|title=Chennai’s Marina beach turns into Tahrir Square for Jallikattu democracy|newspaper=The New Indian Express|access-date=21 January 2017}}</ref> This day incidentally coincided with the birth centenary of former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister [[M. G. Ramachandran|M.G.Ramachadran]]. The crowds started swelling for the night and few hundred spent their night in beach and the crowds continued to gather strength throughout the next day. The protest erupted around the state including Salem, Erode, Coimbatore, Nagercoil, Thiruchrapalli, Pudhuchery.
On 16 January 2017, villagers of Alanganallur protested at [[Alanganallur]] '''Vaadi vaasal''<nowiki/>' – The Arena, the place known for the jallikattu sport – on that date, the sport was also practiced in defiance of the ban.<ref name=":5">{{Cite news|url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil-nadu/2017/jan/16/despite-sc-ban-jallikattu-bulls-released-at-alanganallur-1560115.html|title=Despite SC ban, jallikattu bulls released at Alanganallur|newspaper=The New Indian Express|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> After a day long protest, police arrested the protesters numbering around 200<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thenewsminute.com/article/police-clear-alanganallur-arena-220-protesters-arrested-6am-after-night-long-protests-55817|title=Police clear up Alanganallur arena, 220 protesters detained at 6am after night-long protests|date=17 January 2017|newspaper=The News Minute|access-date=21 January 2017}}</ref> in [[Madurai]]. On 17 January 2017, In support of the arrested, Students gathered in [[Marina Beach]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/chennai/2017/jan/18/chennais-marina-beach-turns-into-tahrir-square-for-jallikattu-democracy-1560841.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170120193036/http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/chennai/2017/jan/18/chennais-marina-beach-turns-into-tahrir-square-for-jallikattu-democracy-1560841.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=20 January 2017|title=Chennai's Marina beach turns into Tahrir Square for Jallikattu democracy|newspaper=The New Indian Express|access-date=21 January 2017}}</ref> This day incidentally coincided with the birth centenary of former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister [[M. G. Ramachandran|M.G.Ramachadran]]. The crowds started swelling for the night and few hundred spent their night in beach and the crowds continued to gather strength throughout the next day. The protest erupted around the state including Salem, Erode, Coimbatore, Nagercoil, Thiruchrapalli, Pudhuchery.
On 19 January, many volunteer groups and individuals once again gathered at the Marina beach for overnight protests.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/jallikattu-protesters-stand-firm-at-marina-beach-on-day-4-we-ll-go-home-only-after-sc-ban-is-lifted/story-PbSoOQV9de8P1bPTOGnbUP.html|title=Jallikattu protesters stand firm: 'We’ll go home only after SC lifts ban'|last=Iyer|first=Aditya|date=20 January 2017|newspaper=Hindustan Times|language=en|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> deputy Tamil Nadu Chief Minister [[O. Panneerselvam|O.Paneerselvam]] met Indian Prime Minister [[Narendra Modi]] and pushed for an ordinance. With no sign of protests relenting the centre suggested ordinance by Tamil Nadu Government. On 20 January, The draft ordinance was approved by Home, Environmental and Cultural Ministry.
On 19 January, many volunteer groups and individuals once again gathered at the Marina beach for overnight protests.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/jallikattu-protesters-stand-firm-at-marina-beach-on-day-4-we-ll-go-home-only-after-sc-ban-is-lifted/story-PbSoOQV9de8P1bPTOGnbUP.html|title=Jallikattu protesters stand firm: 'We'll go home only after SC lifts ban'|last=Iyer|first=Aditya|date=20 January 2017|newspaper=Hindustan Times|language=en|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> deputy Tamil Nadu Chief Minister [[O. Panneerselvam|O.Paneerselvam]] met Indian Prime Minister [[Narendra Modi]] and pushed for an ordinance. With no sign of protests relenting the centre suggested ordinance by Tamil Nadu Government. On 20 January, The draft ordinance was approved by Home, Environmental and Cultural Ministry.


On 20 January, the [[Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu|chief minister of Tamil Nadu]] announced that a law has been drafted and sent to the Central Government, stating, "There are full chances that jallikattu will be organised within 1–2 days."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.in/2017/01/19/jallikattu-ban-tamil-nadu-government-sends-law-amendment-draft/|title=Tamil Nadu May Have Found A Way To Hold Jallikattu 'Within A Day Or Two'|last=Basu|first=Idrani|date=20 January 2017|website=Huffington Post India|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> The Hindustan Times reported that the Centre approved the bill without recommending any changes, and that all that remains now is for it to be signed by the [[President of India]], [[Pranab Mukherjee]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/jallikattu-protests-live-stir-continues-in-tamil-nadu-aiadmk-leaders-meeting-rajnath-singh/story-DQ3o8XgBjskMeqmfKuMAzN.html|title=Jallikattu highlights: Law, environment ministries clear TN govt ordinance; over to the President|date=20 January 2017|newspaper=Hindustan Times|language=en|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> On this day the [[Marina Beach|Marina beach]] Witnessed around 20 lakh<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/chennai-20-lakh-join-in-jallikattu-set-for-tomorrow-4484376/|title=Chennai: 20 lakh join in, Jallikattu set for tomorrow|date=21 January 2017|newspaper=The Indian Express|language=en|access-date=21 January 2017}}</ref> protesters on peaceful Occupy Marina protest alone with lacs thronging various cities of state.. The day witnessed a virtual shutdown in the state as most organization downed their shutters expressing solidarity for the cause.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/As-jallikattu-protests-snowball-TN-to-shut-down/article17063370.ece|title=As jallikattu protests snowball, TN to shut down|last=Rohit|first=T.K.|newspaper=The Hindu|language=en|access-date=21 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.deccanherald.com/content/592398/jallikattu-ordinance-works-shutdown-tamil.html|title=Jallikattu: Ordinance in the works, Shutdown in Tamil Nadu|website=Deccan Herald|access-date=21 January 2017}}</ref>
On 20 January, the [[Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu|chief minister of Tamil Nadu]] announced that a law has been drafted and sent to the Central Government, stating, "There are full chances that jallikattu will be organised within 1–2 days."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.in/2017/01/19/jallikattu-ban-tamil-nadu-government-sends-law-amendment-draft/|title=Tamil Nadu May Have Found A Way To Hold Jallikattu 'Within A Day Or Two'|last=Basu|first=Idrani|date=20 January 2017|website=Huffington Post India|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> The Hindustan Times reported that the Centre approved the bill without recommending any changes, and that all that remains now is for it to be signed by the [[President of India]], [[Pranab Mukherjee]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/jallikattu-protests-live-stir-continues-in-tamil-nadu-aiadmk-leaders-meeting-rajnath-singh/story-DQ3o8XgBjskMeqmfKuMAzN.html|title=Jallikattu highlights: Law, environment ministries clear TN govt ordinance; over to the President|date=20 January 2017|newspaper=Hindustan Times|language=en|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> On this day the [[Marina Beach|Marina beach]] Witnessed around 20 lakh<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/chennai-20-lakh-join-in-jallikattu-set-for-tomorrow-4484376/|title=Chennai: 20 lakh join in, Jallikattu set for tomorrow|date=21 January 2017|newspaper=The Indian Express|language=en|access-date=21 January 2017}}</ref> protesters on peaceful Occupy Marina protest alone with lacs thronging various cities of state.. The day witnessed a virtual shutdown in the state as most organization downed their shutters expressing solidarity for the cause.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/As-jallikattu-protests-snowball-TN-to-shut-down/article17063370.ece|title=As jallikattu protests snowball, TN to shut down|last=Rohit|first=T.K.|newspaper=The Hindu|language=en|access-date=21 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.deccanherald.com/content/592398/jallikattu-ordinance-works-shutdown-tamil.html|title=Jallikattu: Ordinance in the works, Shutdown in Tamil Nadu|website=Deccan Herald|date=20 January 2017|access-date=21 January 2017}}</ref> The Opposition party [[Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam]] (DMK) staged Rail [[Blockade|Roko]] in district headquarters of the state.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Madurai/Jallikattu-protest-disrupts-train-services/article17069485.ece|title=Jallikattu protest disrupts train services|newspaper=The Hindu|language=en|access-date=21 January 2017}}</ref><ref name="indianexpress.com">{{Cite news|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/after-rail-roko-dmk-begins-hunger-protest-in-support-of-jallikattu-4484753/|title=After 'Rail Roko', DMK begins hunger protest in support of Jallikattu|date=21 January 2017|newspaper=The Indian Express|language=en|access-date=21 January 2017}}</ref>


On 21 January, the protests still continue demanding a permanent solution. Some politicians of the opposition parties started fasting as a sign of protest.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/Jallikattu-Stalin-begins-fast/article17073367.ece|title=Jallikattu: Stalin begins fast|last=PTI|accessdate=23 January 2017}}</ref> The State Government promulgated the ordinance and announced that it would conduct the event the next day.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/Governor-clears-ordinance-on-%E2%80%98jallikattu%E2%80%99/article17074093.ece|title=Governor clears ordinance on 'jallikattu'|last=Ramakrishnan|first=T.|newspaper=The Hindu|language=en|access-date=21 January 2017}}</ref> However the protesters refused to budge, as they believe the ordinance has very weak legal grounds and could be overturned in much the same way as the Supreme Court overturned the 2009 ordinance.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/jallikattu-ordinance-manish-tewari-supreme-court-ban-on-jallikattu/1/862777.html|title=Supreme Court can quash Jallikattu Ordinance: Congress Manish Tewari warns against promulgation in hurry|last=Shekhar|first=Kumar Shakti|date=20 January 2017|work=India Today|access-date=25 January 2017}}</ref><ref name=":10">{{Cite news|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/tn-govt-dubs-jallikattu-ordinance-a-permanent-remedy-to-introduce-law-tomorrow/story-1Cu7Dc8CjBB0YGyx9cXKcK.html|title=TN govt dubs Jallikattu ordinance 'permanent' remedy, to introduce law on Monday|last=Iyer|first=Aditya|date=22 January 2017|newspaper=The Hindustan Times|language=en|access-date=25 January 2017}}</ref>
On 21 January, the protests still continue demanding a permanent solution. Some politicians of the opposition parties started fasting as a sign of protest.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/Jallikattu-Stalin-begins-fast/article17073367.ece|title=Jallikattu: Stalin begins fast|newspaper=The Hindu|date=21 January 2017|accessdate=23 January 2017}}</ref> The State Government promulgated the ordinance and announced that it would conduct the event the next day.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/Governor-clears-ordinance-on-%E2%80%98jallikattu%E2%80%99/article17074093.ece|title=Governor clears ordinance on 'jallikattu'|last=Ramakrishnan|first=T.|newspaper=The Hindu|language=en|access-date=21 January 2017}}</ref> However the protesters refused to budge, as they believe the ordinance has very weak legal grounds and could be overturned in much the same way as the Supreme Court overturned the 2009 ordinance.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/jallikattu-ordinance-manish-tewari-supreme-court-ban-on-jallikattu/1/862777.html|title=Supreme Court can quash Jallikattu Ordinance: Congress Manish Tewari warns against promulgation in hurry|last=Shekhar|first=Kumar Shakti|date=20 January 2017|work=India Today|access-date=25 January 2017}}</ref><ref name=":10">{{Cite news|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/tn-govt-dubs-jallikattu-ordinance-a-permanent-remedy-to-introduce-law-tomorrow/story-1Cu7Dc8CjBB0YGyx9cXKcK.html|title=TN govt dubs Jallikattu ordinance 'permanent' remedy, to introduce law on Monday|last=Iyer|first=Aditya|date=22 January 2017|newspaper=The Hindustan Times|language=en|access-date=25 January 2017}}</ref>


On 22 January, the government tried to conduct the sport despite the opposition from the local people in Alanganallur and other parts of Tamil Nadu who demanded a permanent resolution which can ensure jallikattu for generations to come.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/jallikkattu-red-flag-over-tamil-nadu-but-what-the-fight-really-is-for/articleshow/56706727.cms|title=Jallikattu: Red flag over Tamil Nadu but what the fight really is for?|newspaper=The Economic Times|access-date=22 January 2017}}</ref> The protesters had successfully blocked the sport from being conducted as Government festival. However a jallikattu event was organised and held at Pudukottai without proper safety measures on a very short notice and was inaugurated by the government minister, which eventually killed two people and many were left injured.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/jallikattu-claims-two-lives-in-tamil-nadu/articleshow/56716812.cms|title=2 dead, 28 injured in jallikattu in Tamil Nadu|newspaper=The Times of India|access-date=22 January 2017}}</ref>
On 22 January, the government tried to conduct the sport despite the opposition from the local people in Alanganallur and other parts of Tamil Nadu who demanded a permanent resolution which can ensure jallikattu for generations to come.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/jallikkattu-red-flag-over-tamil-nadu-but-what-the-fight-really-is-for/articleshow/56706727.cms|title=Jallikattu: Red flag over Tamil Nadu but what the fight really is for?|newspaper=The Economic Times|access-date=22 January 2017}}</ref> The protesters had successfully blocked the sport from being conducted as Government festival. However a jallikattu event was organised and held at Pudukottai without proper safety measures on a very short notice and was inaugurated by the government minister, which eventually killed two people and many were left injured.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/jallikattu-claims-two-lives-in-tamil-nadu/articleshow/56716812.cms|title=2 dead, 28 injured in jallikattu in Tamil Nadu|newspaper=The Times of India|access-date=22 January 2017}}</ref>


On 23 January, with protesters refusing to budge, police began early morning forceful evictions, moving people by hand and also employing batons.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ians/police-starts-evicting-protesters-from-marina-beach-117012300069_1.html|title=Police starts evicting protesters from Marina Beach|last=IANS|date=23 January 2017|newspaper=Business Standard India|access-date=23 January 2017}}</ref> Protesters at the marina threatened to venture into the sea, but eventually most protesters were removed and access to the protest site was cut off.<ref name="indiatoday.intoday.in">{{Cite news|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/jallikattu-marina-beach-protesters-evicted-chennai/1/864086.html|title=Jallikattu: Police cordon off Chennais Marina Beach, evict protesters from site|access-date=23 January 2017}}</ref> The evictions led to further protesters and threaten to boycott the upcoming [[Republic Day (India)|Republic Day]] celebrations in Chennai beach.<ref name="indiatoday.intoday.in" /><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/jallikattu-evicted-from-marina-beach-protestors-to-boycott-republic-day-117012300064_1.html|title=Jallikattu: Evicted from Marina beach, protestors to boycott Republic Day|last=Narasimhan|first=T. E.|date=23 January 2017|newspaper=Business Standard India|access-date=23 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/jallikattu-protesters-evicted-by-tamil-nadu-police-from-marina-beach-other-places/story-x4wfgwEj6qxybPHwfnYGbK.html|title=Jallikattu protesters evicted by Tamil Nadu police from Marina Beach, other places|date=23 January 2017|newspaper=[[Hindustan Times]]|language=en|access-date=23 January 2017}}</ref>{{where?|date=January 2017}} The entire city came to standstill with protesters blocking major roads and incidents of stone pelting<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/jallikattu-protests-violence-tamil-nadu-chennai-madurai-bull-taming-sport-arson-stone-pelting-clashes-violence-these-pictures-of-jallikattu-protests-will-stun-you/|title=Arson, stone pelting, violence: These pictures of Jallikattu protests will stun you|date=23 January 2017|newspaper=The Indian Express|language=en|access-date=23 January 2017}}</ref> torching of vehicles, police stations<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://in.news.yahoo.com/jallikattu-protests-turn-violent-protesters-034639848.html|title=Jallikattu protests turn violent: Protesters torch vehicles near Ice House Police Station, refuse to leave Chennai's Marina Beach|language=en-IN|access-date=23 January 2017}}</ref> and petrol bombs were thrown whose identity remain unknown.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/jallikattu-protesters-evicted-by-tamil-nadu-police-from-marina-beach-other-places/story-x4wfgwEj6qxybPHwfnYGbK.html|title=Protest turns violent on Chennai’s Marina Beach; vehicles torched, petrol bombs lobbed|date=23 January 2017|newspaper=[[Hindustan Times]]|language=en|access-date=23 January 2017}}</ref> There have also been reports of police involving in burning of autos and vehicles. The videos of cop setting fire on vehicles and involving in arson have been going viral in social media.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.ndtv.com/tamil-nadu-news/video-of-cop-setting-auto-on-fire-allegedly-in-chennai-goes-viral-1651853|title=Video of Cop Setting Auto on Fire, Allegedly in Chennai, Goes Viral|newspaper=NDTV.com|access-date=23 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thenewsminute.com/article/shocking-videos-tn-cops-indulging-vandalism-and-mob-violence-towards-police-56178|title=Shocking videos from TN: Cops indulging in vandalism, mob violence towards police|date=23 January 2017|newspaper=The News Minute|access-date=23 January 2017}}</ref> The initial organizers of protests called for calm and few including actors condemned the violence and the subsequent crackdown.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.newsx.com/national/53522-jallikattu-agitation-actor-kamal-haasan-tells-protesters-to-be-calm|title=Jallikattu agitation: Actor Kamal Haasan tells protesters to be calm|date=23 January 2017|newspaper=NewsX|access-date=23 January 2017}}</ref> At the end of day most of protests were either withdrawn evacuated or forcefully at all places including at Marina Beach, Madurai, Salem, Erode and Coimbatore and normalcy started to be restored.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Madurai/Jallikattu-protests-end-on-peaceful-note/article17082698.ece|title=Jallikattu protests end on peaceful note|last=Correspondent|first=Special|newspaper=The Hindu|language=en|access-date=23 January 2017}}</ref>
On 23 January, with protesters refusing to budge, police began early morning forceful evictions, moving people by hand and also employing batons.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ians/police-starts-evicting-protesters-from-marina-beach-117012300069_1.html|title=Police starts evicting protesters from Marina Beach|date=23 January 2017|newspaper=Business Standard India|access-date=23 January 2017}}</ref> Protesters at the marina threatened to venture into the sea, but eventually most protesters were removed and access to the protest site was cut off.<ref name="indiatoday.intoday.in">{{Cite news|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/jallikattu-marina-beach-protesters-evicted-chennai/1/864086.html|title=Jallikattu: Police cordon off Chennais Marina Beach, evict protesters from site|access-date=23 January 2017}}</ref> The evictions led to further protesters and threaten to boycott the upcoming [[Republic Day (India)|Republic Day]] celebrations in Chennai beach.<ref name="indiatoday.intoday.in" /><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/jallikattu-evicted-from-marina-beach-protestors-to-boycott-republic-day-117012300064_1.html|title=Jallikattu: Evicted from Marina beach, protestors to boycott Republic Day|last=Narasimhan|first=T. E.|date=23 January 2017|newspaper=Business Standard India|access-date=23 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/jallikattu-protesters-evicted-by-tamil-nadu-police-from-marina-beach-other-places/story-x4wfgwEj6qxybPHwfnYGbK.html|title=Jallikattu protesters evicted by Tamil Nadu police from Marina Beach, other places|date=23 January 2017|newspaper=[[Hindustan Times]]|language=en|access-date=23 January 2017}}</ref>{{where|date=January 2017}} The entire city came to standstill with protesters blocking major roads and incidents of stone pelting<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/jallikattu-protests-violence-tamil-nadu-chennai-madurai-bull-taming-sport-arson-stone-pelting-clashes-violence-these-pictures-of-jallikattu-protests-will-stun-you/|title=Arson, stone pelting, violence: These pictures of Jallikattu protests will stun you|date=23 January 2017|newspaper=The Indian Express|language=en|access-date=23 January 2017}}</ref> torching of vehicles, police stations<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://in.news.yahoo.com/jallikattu-protests-turn-violent-protesters-034639848.html|title=Jallikattu protests turn violent: Protesters torch vehicles near Ice House Police Station, refuse to leave Chennai's Marina Beach|language=en-IN|access-date=23 January 2017}}</ref> and petrol bombs were thrown whose identity remain unknown.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/jallikattu-protesters-evicted-by-tamil-nadu-police-from-marina-beach-other-places/story-x4wfgwEj6qxybPHwfnYGbK.html|title=Protest turns violent on Chennai's Marina Beach; vehicles torched, petrol bombs lobbed|date=23 January 2017|newspaper=[[Hindustan Times]]|language=en|access-date=23 January 2017}}</ref> There have also been reports of police involving in burning of autos and vehicles. The videos of cop setting fire on vehicles and involving in arson have been going viral in social media.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.ndtv.com/tamil-nadu-news/video-of-cop-setting-auto-on-fire-allegedly-in-chennai-goes-viral-1651853|title=Video of Cop Setting Auto on Fire, Allegedly in Chennai, Goes Viral|newspaper=NDTV.com|access-date=23 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thenewsminute.com/article/shocking-videos-tn-cops-indulging-vandalism-and-mob-violence-towards-police-56178|title=Shocking videos from TN: Cops indulging in vandalism, mob violence towards police|date=23 January 2017|newspaper=The News Minute|access-date=23 January 2017}}</ref> The initial organizers of protests called for calm and few including actors condemned the violence and the subsequent crackdown.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.newsx.com/national/53522-jallikattu-agitation-actor-kamal-haasan-tells-protesters-to-be-calm|title=Jallikattu agitation: Actor Kamal Haasan tells protesters to be calm|date=23 January 2017|newspaper=NewsX|access-date=23 January 2017}}</ref> At the end of day most of protests were either withdrawn evacuated or forcefully at all places including at Marina Beach, Madurai, Salem, Erode and Coimbatore and normalcy started to be restored.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Madurai/Jallikattu-protests-end-on-peaceful-note/article17082698.ece|title=Jallikattu protests end on peaceful note|newspaper=The Hindu|language=en|access-date=23 January 2017}}</ref>


On 24 January, according to the ''Times of India'', the majority of student protestors in Chennai decided to call off their protest after a dialogue with police and a district court judge, viewing the Tamil Nadu ordinance and planned law as a victory, but promised to restart it if there was no permanent solution for jallikattu by 1 February.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/trichy/peaceful-end-to-jallikattu-protest-despite-bid-to-stir-trouble/articleshow/56743490.cms|title=Peaceful end to jallikattu protest despite bid to stir trouble|newspaper=The Times of India|access-date=25 January 2017}}</ref>
On 24 January, according to the ''Times of India'', the majority of student protestors in Chennai decided to call off their protest after a dialogue with police and a district court judge, viewing the Tamil Nadu ordinance and planned law as a victory, but promised to restart it if there was no permanent solution for jallikattu by 1 February.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/trichy/peaceful-end-to-jallikattu-protest-despite-bid-to-stir-trouble/articleshow/56743490.cms|title=Peaceful end to jallikattu protest despite bid to stir trouble|newspaper=The Times of India|access-date=25 January 2017}}</ref>


The legal situation surrounding jallikattu is as yet not clearly resolved. While the Tamil Nadu government has claimed that its draft ordinance is a "permanent solution",<ref name=":10" /> many jallikattu supporters view it as merely being a "stop gap measure".<ref name=":11">{{Cite news|url=http://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/jallikattu-row-matter-could-still-go-to-supreme-court-and-we-could-get-adverse-decision-says-salman-khurshid/516973/|title=Jallikattu Row: Matter could still go to Supreme Court and we could get adverse decision, says Salman&nbsp;Khurshid|date=21 January 2017|newspaper=The Financial Express|language=en-US|access-date=21 January 2017}}</ref><ref name=":12">{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/national/jallikattu-protesters-demand-permanent-solution/article9496334.ece|title=Jallikattu protesters demand permanent solution|date=22 January 2017|newspaper=The Hindu Business Line|language=en|access-date=25 January 2017}}</ref> As ordinances only last for six months, the Tamil Nadu Assembly plans to make the ordinance into state law "immediately".<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/bill-to-replace-jallikattu-ordinance-to-be-placed-in-tn-assembly-immediately-governor-4487450/|title=Bill to replace ordinance on Jallikattu to be placed in Tamil Nadu Assembly immediately: Governor|date=23 January 2017|newspaper=The Indian Express|language=en|access-date=25 January 2017}}</ref> Some, however such as [[Ministry of External Affairs (India)|Ministry of External Affairs]] cabinet minister [[Salman Khurshid]], have stated that the matter will only be truly resolved if the [[Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act]] is amended as [[local ordinances]] and state laws cannot trump [[Law of India|Indian federal law]].<ref name=":11" /> According to ''The Hindu'', many other Indian legal experts agreed with Khurshid's view, as federal laws such as the PCA are always more powerful than state laws, and in that respect the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act of 2017 is not much different from the 2009 one.<ref name=":12" /> On 24 January, in light of the new Tamil Nadu legislation, the Centre withdrew its notification allowing the sport; this means that any new legal challenges will be directed against the new legislation.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/Centre-withdraws-2016-notification-on-jallikattu/article17088044.ece1|title=Centre withdraws 2016 notification on jallikattu|last=PTI|date=24 January 2017|newspaper=The Hindu|language=en|access-date=25 January 2017}}</ref> For its part, PETA India has said that it will "study" the new ordinance, and has not ruled out a challenge to the new law on the same grounds as it challenged the 2009 law.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/cruelty-to-animals-is-anti-india-says-peta-india-ceo-amid-jallikattu-protests/story-kJgbed7mmFiMPoq9vB8oSO.html|title=Jallikattu reflects poorly on India: PETA India CEO after 'bullying'|date=23 January 2017|newspaper=The Hindustan Times|language=en|access-date=25 January 2017}}</ref> On 25 January, the [[Animal Welfare Board of India]] (AWBI) restarted the legal process by formally challenging the new law before the Supreme Court,<ref name=":2">{{Cite news|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/jallikattu-supreme-court-tamil-nadu-government-law/1/866085.html|title=Tamil Nadu's new jallikattu law challenged in Supreme Court|last=Soni|first=Anusha|date=25 January 2017|work=India Today|access-date=27 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2017/jan/25/jallikattu-challenged-again-in-supreme-court-by-animal-rights-body-1563367.html|title=Jallikattu challenged again in Supreme Court by animal rights body|date=25 January 2017|newspaper=The New Indian Express|access-date=27 January 2017}}</ref> but it withdrew the petition the next day.<ref name=":13">{{Cite news|url=http://newstodaynet.com/chennai/awbi-withdraw-plea-against-tn-jallikattu-law |title=AWBI to withdraw plea against TN Jallikattu law |date=26 January 2017 |newspaper=News Today |language=en |access-date=28 January 2017 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170126115359/http://newstodaynet.com/chennai/awbi-withdraw-plea-against-tn-jallikattu-law |archivedate=26 January 2017 }}</ref> According to the AWBI's acting chairperson, AWBI does not plan to re-file the petition, but he claimed no knowledge of what other organizations, such as PETA, may do.<ref name=":13" />
The legal situation surrounding jallikattu is as yet not clearly resolved. While the Tamil Nadu government has claimed that its draft ordinance is a "permanent solution",<ref name=":10" /> many jallikattu supporters view it as merely being a "stop gap measure".<ref name=":11">{{Cite news|url=http://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/jallikattu-row-matter-could-still-go-to-supreme-court-and-we-could-get-adverse-decision-says-salman-khurshid/516973/|title=Jallikattu Row: Matter could still go to Supreme Court and we could get adverse decision, says Salman&nbsp;Khurshid|date=21 January 2017|newspaper=The Financial Express|language=en-US|access-date=21 January 2017}}</ref><ref name=":12">{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/national/jallikattu-protesters-demand-permanent-solution/article9496334.ece|title=Jallikattu protesters demand permanent solution|date=22 January 2017|newspaper=The Hindu Business Line|language=en|access-date=25 January 2017}}</ref> As ordinances only last for six months, the Tamil Nadu Assembly plans to make the ordinance into state law "immediately".<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/bill-to-replace-jallikattu-ordinance-to-be-placed-in-tn-assembly-immediately-governor-4487450/|title=Bill to replace ordinance on Jallikattu to be placed in Tamil Nadu Assembly immediately: Governor|date=23 January 2017|newspaper=The Indian Express|language=en|access-date=25 January 2017}}</ref> Some, however such as [[Ministry of External Affairs (India)|Ministry of External Affairs]] cabinet minister [[Salman Khurshid]], have stated that the matter will only be truly resolved if the [[Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act]] is amended as [[local ordinances]] and state laws cannot trump [[Law of India|Indian federal law]].<ref name=":11" /> According to ''The Hindu'', many other Indian legal experts agreed with Khurshid's view, as federal laws such as the PCA are always more powerful than state laws, and in that respect the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act of 2017 is not much different from the 2009 one.<ref name=":12" /> On 24 January, in light of the new Tamil Nadu legislation, the Centre withdrew its notification allowing the sport; this means that any new legal challenges will be directed against the new legislation.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/Centre-withdraws-2016-notification-on-jallikattu/article17088044.ece1|title=Centre withdraws 2016 notification on jallikattu|date=24 January 2017|newspaper=The Hindu|language=en|access-date=25 January 2017}}</ref> For its part, PETA India has said that it will "study" the new ordinance, and has not ruled out a challenge to the new law on the same grounds as it challenged the 2009 law.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/cruelty-to-animals-is-anti-india-says-peta-india-ceo-amid-jallikattu-protests/story-kJgbed7mmFiMPoq9vB8oSO.html|title=Jallikattu reflects poorly on India: PETA India CEO after 'bullying'|date=23 January 2017|newspaper=The Hindustan Times|language=en|access-date=25 January 2017}}</ref> On 25 January, the [[Animal Welfare Board of India]] (AWBI) restarted the legal process by formally challenging the new law before the Supreme Court,<ref name=":2">{{Cite news|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/jallikattu-supreme-court-tamil-nadu-government-law/1/866085.html|title=Tamil Nadu's new jallikattu law challenged in Supreme Court|last=Soni|first=Anusha|date=25 January 2017|work=India Today|access-date=27 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2017/jan/25/jallikattu-challenged-again-in-supreme-court-by-animal-rights-body-1563367.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170125075800/http://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2017/jan/25/jallikattu-challenged-again-in-supreme-court-by-animal-rights-body-1563367.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=25 January 2017|title=Jallikattu challenged again in Supreme Court by animal rights body|date=25 January 2017|newspaper=The New Indian Express|access-date=27 January 2017}}</ref> but it withdrew the petition the next day.<ref name=":13">{{Cite news|url=http://newstodaynet.com/chennai/awbi-withdraw-plea-against-tn-jallikattu-law |title=AWBI to withdraw plea against TN Jallikattu law |date=26 January 2017 |newspaper=News Today |language=en |access-date=28 January 2017 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170126115359/http://newstodaynet.com/chennai/awbi-withdraw-plea-against-tn-jallikattu-law |archivedate=26 January 2017 }}</ref> According to the AWBI's acting chairperson, AWBI does not plan to re-file the petition, but he claimed no knowledge of what other organizations, such as PETA, may do.<ref name=":13" />


On 6 July 2017, PETA India released a YouTube video showing the results of their investigation of five Jallikattu events which took place across Tamil Nadu in February 2017.<ref>{{Cite AV media|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fy9n-6--4FE|title=PETA Investigates Jallikattu – February 2017|date=6 July 2017|type=YouTube video|language=en, ta}}</ref> According to PETA, their investigation showed abuse of the animals during the February events, including the tails of bulls being bitten and twisted, collapsed bulls being pulled by ropes attached to their noses, and bulls having their tailbones purposefully broken.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.petaindia.com/features/new-jallikattu-investigation/|title=Shocking New Jallikattu Investigation Leads PETA Back to Supreme Court|date=6 July 2017|work=PETA India|access-date=2017-07-08|language=en-US}}</ref> In an interview with ''The Hindu'', organisers of the events denied the claims of PETA.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/jallikattu-organisers-deny-petas-claims-madurai/article19225290.ece|title=Jallikattu organisers deny PETA’s claims|last=Arunachalam|first=Pon Vasanth|date=6 July 2017|work=The Hindu|access-date=2017-07-08|language=en}}</ref> On 7 July 2017, PETA filed a petition with the Supreme Court of India seeking a renewed ban on Jallikattu via the invalidation of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act of 2017 as unconstitutional.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil-nadu/2017/jul/07/peta-moves-supreme-court-challenging-validity-of-act-that-paved-way-for-jallikattu-1625282.html|title=PETA moves Supreme Court challenging validity of Act that paved way for jallikattu|last=Arulappan|first=Vinodh|date=7 July 2017|work=The New Indian Express|access-date=2017-07-08}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.firstpost.com/india/peta-moves-supreme-court-against-amendments-in-law-to-allow-jallikattu-3784275.html|title=PETA moves Supreme Court against amendments in law to allow jallikattu|date=2017-07-06|work=Firstpost|access-date=2017-07-08|language=en-US}}</ref>
On 6 July 2017, PETA India released a YouTube video showing the results of their investigation of five Jallikattu events which took place across Tamil Nadu in February 2017.<ref>{{Cite AV media|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fy9n-6--4FE|title=PETA Investigates Jallikattu – February 2017|date=6 July 2017|type=YouTube video}}</ref> According to PETA, their investigation showed abuse of the animals during the February events, including the tails of bulls being bitten and twisted, collapsed bulls being pulled by ropes attached to their noses, and bulls having their tailbones purposefully broken.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.petaindia.com/features/new-jallikattu-investigation/|title=Shocking New Jallikattu Investigation Leads PETA Back to Supreme Court|date=6 July 2017|work=PETA India|access-date=2017-07-08|language=en-US}}</ref> In an interview with ''The Hindu'', organisers of the events denied the claims of PETA.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/jallikattu-organisers-deny-petas-claims-madurai/article19225290.ece|title=Jallikattu organisers deny PETA's claims|last=Arunachalam|first=Pon Vasanth|date=6 July 2017|work=The Hindu|access-date=2017-07-08|language=en}}</ref> On 7 July 2017, PETA filed a petition with the Supreme Court of India seeking a renewed ban on Jallikattu via the invalidation of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act of 2017 as unconstitutional.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil-nadu/2017/jul/07/peta-moves-supreme-court-challenging-validity-of-act-that-paved-way-for-jallikattu-1625282.html|title=PETA moves Supreme Court challenging validity of Act that paved way for jallikattu|last=Arulappan|first=Vinodh|date=7 July 2017|work=The New Indian Express|access-date=2017-07-08}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.firstpost.com/india/peta-moves-supreme-court-against-amendments-in-law-to-allow-jallikattu-3784275.html|title=PETA moves Supreme Court against amendments in law to allow jallikattu|date=2017-07-06|work=Firstpost|access-date=2017-07-08|language=en-US}}</ref>


On 2 February 2018, the Supreme Court of India accepted PETA's petition, referring the case to its [[Constitution bench (India)|constitution bench]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/sc-refers-jallikattu-challenge-to-constitution-bench/article22630214.ece|title=Supreme Court refers jallikattu challenge to Constitution Bench|last=Rajagopal|first=Krishnadas|date=2018-02-02|work=The Hindu|access-date=2018-12-16|language=en-IN|issn=0971-751X}}</ref>
On 2 February 2018, the Supreme Court of India accepted PETA's petition, referring the case to its [[Constitution bench (India)|constitution bench]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/sc-refers-jallikattu-challenge-to-constitution-bench/article22630214.ece|title=Supreme Court refers jallikattu challenge to Constitution Bench|last=Rajagopal|first=Krishnadas|date=2018-02-02|work=The Hindu|access-date=2018-12-16|language=en-IN|issn=0971-751X}}</ref>
Line 57: Line 79:
=== Other demands ===
=== Other demands ===
* Boycott of foreign companies such as Pepsi, Coca-Cola as their water consumption is affecting local farmers.{{Citation needed|date=October 2017|reason=I believe, the other demands section can be removed. It was not an official demand to the government rather a resolution observed by the ppl of Tamil Nadu. Moreover, The reference provided has nothing to do with the protest. In fact it looks like the article was written in Dec 2016.}}<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/tamil-nadu/water-starved-tamil-nadu-farmers-seek-to-take-the-fizz-out-of-cola-giants/story-wrL2gH96fQxpkXPHk0V8cO.html|title=Water-starved Tamil Nadu farmers seek to take the fizz out of cola giants|date=23 December 2016|newspaper=[[Hindustan Times]]|language=en|access-date=19 January 2017}}</ref>
* Boycott of foreign companies such as Pepsi, Coca-Cola as their water consumption is affecting local farmers.{{Citation needed|date=October 2017|reason=I believe, the other demands section can be removed. It was not an official demand to the government rather a resolution observed by the ppl of Tamil Nadu. Moreover, The reference provided has nothing to do with the protest. In fact it looks like the article was written in Dec 2016.}}<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/tamil-nadu/water-starved-tamil-nadu-farmers-seek-to-take-the-fizz-out-of-cola-giants/story-wrL2gH96fQxpkXPHk0V8cO.html|title=Water-starved Tamil Nadu farmers seek to take the fizz out of cola giants|date=23 December 2016|newspaper=[[Hindustan Times]]|language=en|access-date=19 January 2017}}</ref>

== Background ==
{{Main|Jallikattu}}
Jallikattu is a traditional bull taming event wherein a berserk bull is released into a crowd, and the participants of the crowd individually attempt to grab and hold on to the bull's hump for a determined distance, a determined time, or with the goal of removing a packet of money tied to the bull's horns.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/view-blanket-ban-on-jallikattu-would-be-tantamount-to-banning-all-motor-cars/articleshow/56681598.cms |title=View: Blanket ban on Jallikattu would be tantamount to banning all motor cars |date=20 January 2017 |work=The Economic Times |author=Salim David}}</ref> The sport, which is considered to be 2500–10,000 years old,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/thread/arts-culture-society/Missing-the-bulls-eye/article17040148.ece |title=Missing the bull's eye |date=14 January 2017 |work=The Hindu |author=Vidya Venkat}}</ref> is usually held during [[Thai Pongal]] across several locations in [[Tamil Nadu]],<ref>{{cite news|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/explained/jallikattu-protests-in-tamil-nadu-and-the-many-legal-twists-and-turns-4482563/ |title=Taking Jallikattu bull by the horns: Protests in TN and the many legal twists and turns |date=20 January 2017 |work=The Indian Express |author=Arun Janardhanan}}</ref> with the primary event being held in [[Alanganallur]].<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.deccanherald.com/content/592832/jallikattu-claims-two-lives-tn.html|title=Jallikattu claims two lives in TN |date=23 January 2017 |work=Deccan Herald}}</ref> During the event, injuries or even death often occur to participants.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/what-is-jallikattu-1650547|title=What Is Jallikattu? All You need To Know About Tamil Nadu's Bull-Taming Tradition|newspaper=NDTV.com|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> While bull breeders contend that the participating bulls are treated well,<ref name=":7" /> PETA asserts its investigators found that the bulls suffers [[Cruelty to animals|cruel treatment]], from having their tails twisted, being stabbed, punched and jumped on.<ref name=":3">{{Cite news|url=http://www.petaindia.com/blog/sc-bans-jallikattu-bull-races-fights/|title=Supreme Court Bans Jallikattu, Bull Races and Bullfights|date=7 May 2014|newspaper=PETA India|language=en-US|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> India's [[Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act]] (PCAA) outlaws animal cruelty, and sets up the punishment offenders can expect to receive. The Madras High Court was the first to rule that jallikattu was not allowable under the PCAA in 2006.<ref>{{cite web|accessdate=2020-09-20|title=Jallikattu ban: BJP backs people of Tamil Nadu, blames UPA for depriving state of traditional sport|url=https://www.firstpost.com/politics/jallikattu-ban-bjp-backs-people-of-tamil-nadu-blames-upa-for-depriving-state-of-traditional-sport-3211794.html|date=19 January 2017|website=[[Firstpost]]|first=Amit|last=Malviya}}</ref> However, traditional sports like jallikattu have since then always been allowed through various legal and extralegal means, the most recent of which is the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Jallikattu Act No 27, passed by the [[Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly]] and signed into law in 2009.<ref name=":3" />

In January 2011, [[Hema Malini]] appealed to the [[Ministry of Environment and Forests]] (MoE) to ban Jallikatu, and it responded by issuing a notification that bulls may no longer be used as performing animals in India, adding it to a list which previously included only bears, monkeys, tigers, panthers and lions.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.news18.com/news/india/timeline-jallikattu-ban-and-controversy-1334827.html|title=Timeline: Jallikattu Ban And Controversy|date=12 January 2017|newspaper=News18|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> Armed with this, in April 2011, PETA announced that it would challenge the 2009 Tamil Nadu law as [[unconstitutional]], as it now conflicts with the [[Law of India|Indian federal law]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.petaindia.com/blog/peta-goes-supreme-court-jallikattu-ban/|title=PETA Goes to Supreme Court for Jallikattu Ban|date=27 April 2011|newspaper=PETA India|language=en-US|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> After three years in court, on 7 May 2014, PETA, represented by Raj Panjwani, along with the [[Animal Welfare Board of India]] (AWBI), striking down the 2009 Tamil Nadu law.<ref name=":3" /> In defiance of the ban, citizens of Tamil Nadu attempted to carry out the tradition on 18 January 2015, but police arrested forty six people and allowed the animals to go free.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/46-arrested-for-violating-jallikattu-ban-in-salem-district-of-tamil-nadu/article6799135.ece|title=46 arrested for violating Jallikattu ban|last=PTI|date=18 January 2015|newspaper=The Hindu|language=en|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref>

In preparation for the 2016 jallikattu season, [[Government of India|the Centre]] reversed its earlier decision and on 7 January 2016 MoE once again removed bulls from the list of banned performing animals.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-35259793|title=Jallikattu: India lifts ban on bullfighting in Tamil Nadu|date=8 January 2016|newspaper=BBC News|language=en-GB|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> Justices [[Dipak Misra]] and [[Rohinton Fali Nariman]] were highly critical of this reaction, and were quoted by ''[[The Hindu]]'' as stating jointly:<ref name=":9">{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/SC-questions-Centre%E2%80%99s-notification-supporting-%E2%80%98jallikattu%E2%80%99/article16737432.ece|title=SC questions Centre’s notification supporting 'jallikattu'|last=PTI|newspaper=The Hindu|language=en|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> "How can you negate our judgment banning jallikattu by coming up with the January 2016 notification allowing bulls to participate in the sport again? [...] We cannot import [[Roman gladiator]]-type sport here." The Supreme Court issued a stay order on 12 January 2016, effectively banning the sport just five days after the Centre unbanned it.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/india-supreme-court-issues-stay-order-jallikattu-bull-taming-sport-1537441|title=India: Supreme Court puts a stay on Jallikattu bull taming sport|last=Rebello|first=Lara|date=12 January 2016|newspaper=International Business Times UK|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-supreme-court-upholds-ban-on-jallikattu-2165531|title=Supreme Court upholds ban on Jallikattu|date=14 January 2016|newspaper=DNA|language=en-US|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> With the police on their side this time, however, jallikattu went ahead anyway, and thousands gathered to watch bull races and the main sport.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/andhra-pradesh/Over-35-injured-as-building-collapses-during-Jallikattu/article14009667.ece|title=Over 35 injured as building collapses during Jallikattu|date=20 January 2016|newspaper=The Hindu|language=en|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Despite-SC-ban-Jallikattu-held-in-Andhra-Pradesh-villages/articleshow/50603346.cms|title=Despite SC ban, 'Jallikattu' held in Andhra Pradesh villages|last=Akbar|first=Syed|date=16 January 2016|newspaper=The Times of India|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref>

In preparation for the 2017 season, once again multiple petitions were filed to try to get the Supreme Court to reconsider; and once again they were all denied, including a petition attempting to argue a [[religious freedom]] angle.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/Apex-court-refuses-to-lift-ban-on-jallikattu/article16460630.ece|title=Apex court refuses to lift ban on jallikattu|last=Rajagopal|first=Krishnadas|date=2 December 2016|newspaper=The Hindu|language=en|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> The Supreme Court once again sparred with the Centre, who was trying to get it unbanned as it was a 5,000-year-old cultural tradition of the Tamil people, but the court responded simply "In 1899, ten thousand girls below 12 years of age were married. Should we allow it today because it was a tradition at that time?" and rejected the petition.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.ndtv.com/tamil-nadu-news/jallikattu-5000-years-old-so-what-supreme-courts-sharp-remarks-on-bull-fest-1436227|title=Jallikattu 5000-Years-Old, So What? Supreme Court's Sharp Remarks on Bull Fest|last=Vaidyanathan|first=A.|date=26 July 2016|last2=Shukla|first2=Shuchi|newspaper=NDTV.com|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> For the 2017 season, political tension was high, perhaps sparking the massive protest: people blamed the [[AIADMK]] and [[Bharatiya Janata Party|BJP]] political parties for failing to reverse the ban during the last three years. Once again, citizens flouted the Supreme Court, and jallikattu went ahead despite its legal status.<ref name=":5" /> With an uncooperative judiciary, the other branches of government began work on a law which would override the court's decision: on 19 January 2017, [[prime minister of India]] [[Narendra Modi]] vowed to support Tamil Nadu but declined to give further details, claiming that he could not as the case was currently ''[[sub judice]]''.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/Modi-says-jallikattu-is-sub-judice/article17059806.ece|title=Modi says jallikattu is sub-judice|last=Correspondent|first=Special|newspaper=The Hindu|language=en|access-date=19 January 2017}}</ref> In an interview, former Supreme Court justice [[Markandey Katju]] observed that laws can be changed even when the matter is in court as was done for the act that abolished ''[[zamindari]]'' in the 1950s when the [[Jawaharlal Nehru|Nehru]] government removed the [[right to property]] as a [[fundamental right]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thenewsminute.com/article/centre-need-not-wait-sc-order-can-pass-ordinance-jallikattu-katju-tnm-55930|title=Centre need not wait for SC order, can pass ordinance on jallikattu: Katju to TNM|date=18 January 2017|newspaper=The News Minute|access-date=19 January 2017}}</ref>

=== Support ===
Jallikattu is cited as one of the last available ways to promote and preserve<ref name="Natarajan">{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-36798500|title=Jallikattu: Why India bullfighting ban 'threatens native breeds'|last=Natarajan|first=Swaminathan|date=19 July 2016|newspaper=BBC News|language=en-GB|access-date=21 January 2017}}</ref><ref name=":6">{{cite web|url=https://thewire.in/19157/banning-jallikattu-will-decimate-indias-indigenous-cattle-breeds/|title=Banning Jallikattu Will Decimate India's Indigenous Cattle Breeds – The Wire|last=Anugula|first=Himakiran|website=thewire.in|language=en-GB|access-date=21 January 2017}}</ref> the native livestock because the other uses of native breeds such as ploughing, breeding via mating and milk is on decline due to advancement in mechanization by tractors, improvement in artificial insemination and hybrid Jersey cows respectively.<ref name=":6" /> Karthikeyan Siva Senaapathy, a native breed activist, has said in an interview with the [[BBC]] that "[Tamil Nadu] had over one million [[Kangayam cattle|Kangayam bulls]] in 1990. The population has fallen to 15,000 now."<ref name="Natarajan" /><ref name=":6" /> Minor protests were initiated by cattle rights activists and farmers such as Karthikeya Sivasenapathy who has appeared multiple times on the [[STAR Vijay]] talk show ''[[Neeya Naana]]''. Music videos, such as "Takkaru Takkaru" by [[Hiphop Tamizha]], and on Facebook videos to talk about jallikattu and its benefits inspired the protestors.<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/jallikattu-warriors-meet-the-hi-tech-brains-behind-chennai-protests/story-FEhufoLh0bpRkkZORLn9VJ.html |title=Meet the campaigners behind the Jallikattu uprising|date=19 January 2017|newspaper=hindustantimes.com/|language=en|accessdate=20 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.kangayambull.com/about-us/about-skcrf/|title=Senaapathy Kangayam Cattle Research Foundation – About Us|website=www.kangayambull.com|accessdate=19 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/features/metroplus/bull-stop/article5609632.ece|title=BULL Stop!|last=RAO|first=SUBHA J|newspaper=The Hindu|language=en|accessdate=20 January 2017}}</ref> Sivasenapathy has claimed that the indigenous cattle bulls are critically endangered in Tamil Nadu and banning jallikattu will have the adverse effect of wiping them out completely.<ref>{{Citation|last=Jalli Kattu|title=jallikattu Karthikeya sivasenathipathi speech|date=26 July 2016|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tByxohxx96s|accessdate=19 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Citation|last=News7 Tamil|title=Interview with Hip Hop Tamizha 'Aadhi' about Jallikattu {{!}} News7 Tamil|date=11 January 2017|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiPq6f6CVQA|accessdate=19 January 2017}}</ref> According to Sivasenapthy and other pro-jallikattu activists, jallikattu is not just a sport that is deeply entrenched in Tamil culture, but it has also inadvertently served as a scientific method of breeding cattle.{{clarify|date=January 2017|reason=This is vague. How exactly does the science work? What makes jallikattu, a sport where people grab a bull's hump and ride it, an effective way to determine the quality of offspring? What were the controls? What scientific experimentations support this conclusion?}} This view is held among a majority of jallikattu supporters.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.facebook.com/SunTv/videos/809775729161333/|title=Sun TV – இணைய செயற்பாட்டாளர் ராஜ்மோகன் ஜல்லிக்கட்டு பற்றிய... {{!}} Facebook|website=www.facebook.com|language=en|accessdate=21 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/jallikattu-bull-taming-sport-breeding-process/1/858086.html|title=Jallikattu is not cruelty but a breeding process, say its proponents|accessdate=21 January 2017}}</ref> The protest is aimed at revival of the native humped bull, called the [[zebu]]. The [[Kangayam cattle|Tamil Nadu breed]] of zebu is unique to India and has several advantages compared to European varieties of cattle such as the [[Holstein Friesian cattle|Holstein cow]]. The native breeds are rich in the A2 variety of beta [[casein protein]] which aides easy [[digestion]] whereas milk from European [[Cattle|''Bos taurus'']] contain the A1 variant of the beta casein protein which is related to allergies and some serious health conditions.<ref name=":1">{{Cite news|url=http://www.downtoearth.org.in/blog/the-deshi-cow-milk-jinx-45095|title=The deshi cow milk jinx|language=en|access-date=21 January 2017}}</ref> The Holstein breeds found their way into India as a result of [[Operation Flood]] of late 1960s through cross breeding to increase the low milk yield of native breeds. As the [[Jersey cow]] can yield nine times the quantity of milk as a zebu in the same period, there is concern among protesters that without jallikattu providing an [[economic incentive]] for the breeding of zebu, the breed will become [[Rare breed (agriculture)|endangered]] and eventually [[extinct]].<ref name=":7">{{Cite news|url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil-nadu/2017/jan/21/does-jallikattu-really-help-the-native-breeds-1561910--1.html|title=Does Jallikattu really help the native breeds?|last=Sushmitha|first=Ramakrishnan|date=21 January 2017|newspaper=The New Indian Express|access-date=22 January 2017}}</ref> PETA disputes the allegation that outlawing jallikattu would lead to a loss of the Tamil Nadu zebu, stating that the bulls can still be used as [[Stud (animal)|studs]] regardless of whether jallikattu is legal or not.<ref name=":8" />

Support from various groups, including film actors, politicians, cricketers and other sportsmen, social activists, and authors. [[Raghava Lawrence]], actor [[Silambarasan]], director [[V. Gowthaman]], [[Seeman (politician)|Seeman]], [[Samuthirakani]], [[Ameer (director)|Ameer]], [[RJ Balaji]], [[Aari (actor)|Aari]], [[Mansoor Ali Khan (actor)|Mansoor Ali Khan]] and [[G. V. Prakash Kumar]] took part actively during the protests. Spiritual leaders like [[Sri Sri Ravi Shankar]], and [[Jaggi Vasudev|Sadhuguru Jaggi Vasudev]]<ref name=":0">{{Cite news|url=http://www.ndtv.com/tamil-nadu-news/for-jallikattu-ar-rahman-will-fast-sri-sri-ravi-shankar-and-sadhuguru-jaggi-vasudeva-lend-support-1650625|title=For Jallikattu, AR Rahman To Fast, Sri Sri Ravi Shankar And Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudeva Say Ban Must End|newspaper=NDTV.com|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> also spoke in support of the sport.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.firstpost.com/india/jallikattu-tamil-nadu-celebrities-step-forward-offer-support-on-social-media-3211472.html|title=Jallikattu: Tamil Nadu celebrities step forward, offer support on social media|date=19 January 2017|newspaper=Firstpost|language=en-US|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> The protestors rejected any attempt for leadership by politicians and celebrities and wished to remain a leaderless mass movement.

On 19 January 2017, film composer [[A. R. Rahman]] announced that he will observe a day-long fast in support of the protesters, and for 'Tamil Nadu's spirit'.<ref name=":0" />

=== Opposition ===
The main opposition of jallikattu comes from the Indian branch of the international non-governmental organization [[People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals]] (PETA). PETA's opposition is also shared by the Animal Welfare Board of India (AWBI), [[Federation of Indian Animal Protection Organisations]] and Compassion Unlimited Plus Action (CUPA).<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/supreme-court-to-examine-plea-against-tamil-nadus-law-on-jallikattu/articleshow/56784708.cms?|title=Supreme Court to examine plea against Tamil Nadu's law on Jallikattu|newspaper=The Times of India|access-date=28 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fiapo.org/our-campaigns/save-the-bulls-support-the-ban/|title=Banned, but #StillNotSafe|website=FIAPO|language=en-US|access-date=22 January 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170117203915/http://www.fiapo.org/our-campaigns/save-the-bulls-support-the-ban/|archive-date=17 January 2017|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref> Judges of the Supreme Court of India have likewise criticized the Indian Central Government's support of jallikattu just because it is a tradition and have voiced their opposition of it.<ref name=":9" /> The Supreme has held that the sport is inherently cruel in nature and this deprives the animal of its basic right to live without subject to fear and torture. The judgement also clarifies that the sport is neither religious ritual nor an essential sport for the Tamil community as the sport is played only in few districts of central Tamil Nadu and not in all districts. The sport has claimed multiple lives including those of the tamers, onlookers and the police. The first ban on jallikattu was a result of a case filed by the father of a tamer who lost his life in the event.

[[People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals|PETA]] denies that ending the jallikattu event will lead to the loss of the native bull, and has pointed out that bulls can be used as studs regardless of whether or not they are engaged in jallikattu. Furthermore, PETA claims that [[veterinarians]] can determine which bulls are healthiest with far more scientific rigor than jallikattu can.<ref name=":8">{{Cite news|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.in/poorva-joshipura/clearing-up-all-the-bull-around-jallikattu/|title=Clearing Up All The Bull Around Jallikattu|author1=Poorva Joshipura; CEO PETA India |date=21 July 2016|newspaper=Huffington Post India|accessdate=20 January 2017}}</ref>


== Nature of protest ==
== Nature of protest ==
The protests were spontaneous<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/chennai/2017/jan/18/chennais-marina-beach-turns-into-tahrir-square-for-jallikattu-democracy-1560841.html|title=Chennai’s Marina beach turns into Tahrir Square for Jallikattu democracy|newspaper=The New Indian Express|access-date=19 January 2017}}</ref> and had no specific organizers. The protest started as Occupy Marina protest along with sit-ins at large grounds across the state. The protests were initially formed by members of Student community across the state which was further strengthened by people from various sections such as IT professionals<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/techies-join-jallikattu-stir-paneer-selvam-to-meet-pm-narendra-modi/articleshow/56654807.cms|title=Jallikattu Fight: Techies join Jallikattu stir, Paneerselvam to meet PM Narendra Modi|newspaper=The Economic Times|access-date=19 January 2017}}</ref> who joined later. The lack of leader was seen as stumbling block for the state government because it could not call people for talks. The protest were largely peaceful except few [[Baton charge]] by the police.
The protests were spontaneous<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/chennai/2017/jan/18/chennais-marina-beach-turns-into-tahrir-square-for-jallikattu-democracy-1560841.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170120193036/http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/chennai/2017/jan/18/chennais-marina-beach-turns-into-tahrir-square-for-jallikattu-democracy-1560841.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=20 January 2017|title=Chennai's Marina beach turns into Tahrir Square for Jallikattu democracy|newspaper=The New Indian Express|access-date=19 January 2017}}</ref> and had no specific organizers. The protest started as Occupy Marina protest along with sit-ins at large grounds across the state. The protests were initially formed by members of Student community across the state which was further strengthened by people from various sections such as IT professionals<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/techies-join-jallikattu-stir-paneer-selvam-to-meet-pm-narendra-modi/articleshow/56654807.cms|title=Jallikattu Fight: Techies join Jallikattu stir, Paneerselvam to meet PM Narendra Modi|newspaper=The Economic Times|access-date=19 January 2017}}</ref> who joined later. The lack of leader was seen as stumbling block for the state government because it could not call people for talks. The protest were largely peaceful except few [[Baton charge]] by the police.


The protests are not just confined to [[Chennai]] but thousand gathered across the state in prominent places such as MGR Circle in [[Trichy]],<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Tiruchirapalli/Jallikattu-supporters-shift-venue-then-end-protest/article17082607.ece|title=Thousands gather at MGR Circle demanding jallikattu|last=Correspondent|first=Special|newspaper=The Hindu|language=en|access-date=24 January 2017}}</ref> Thamukam Grounds in [[Madurai]],<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Madurai/Thousands-gather-at-Tamukkam-demanding-jallikattu/article17055841.ece|title=Thousands gather at Tamukkam demanding jallikattu|last=Correspondent|first=Special|newspaper=The Hindu|language=en|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> VOC Ground in [[Coimbatore]],<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/national/jallikattu-protests-intensify-in-coimbatore/article9492445.ece|title=Jallikattu protests intensify in Coimbatore|last=Revathy|first=LN|date=20 January 2017|newspaper=The Hindu Business Line|language=en|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> VOC Ground-[[Tirunelveli]], VOC Ground in [[Erode]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-tamilnadu/We-want-jallikattu-ban-PETA-say-citizens-in-one-voice/article17058086.ece|title=We want jallikattu, ban PETA, say citizens in one voice|work= The Hindu|access-date=19 January 2017}}</ref> [[Vellore Fort]] in [[Vellore]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/madurai/protest-in-vellore-gathered-at-fort-flay-centre-state-failure/articleshow/56660159.cms|title=Protest in Vellore: Gathered at fort, flay Centre, state failure|work= Times of India|access-date=19 January 2017}}</ref> [[Salem, Tamil Nadu|Salem]], [[Nagercoil]], [[Thanjavur]] and [[Pondicherry|Puducherry]]. Tamil youths from other states express solidarity with jallikattu protesters in Tamil Nadu. There was demonstration in [[Bengaluru]],<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/bengaluru/2017/jan/19/karnataka-tamil-youth-express-solidarity-with-jallikattu-protestors-across-the-border-1561350.html|title=Karnataka Tamil youth express solidarity with Jallikattu protestors across the border|newspaper=newindianexpress.com|language=en|access-date=19 January 2017}}</ref> [[Mumbai]],<ref name="DNA Human chain" /> [[Ahmedabad]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ahmedabad/group-protests-ban-on-jallikattu/articleshow/56674219.cms|title=Group protests ban on jallikattu|newspaper=indiatimes.com|language=en|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> and [[Delhi]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-mumbai-s-tamils-form-human-chain-to-support-jallikattu-2293876|title=Delhi Tamilians came together to save Tamil tradition|publisher=newindianexpress.com|accessdate=20 January 2017}}</ref> Support for the protest also came from Tamils around the world<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thenewsminute.com/article/london-madurai-and-beyond-tamilians-protest-against-jallikattu-ban-55897|title=From London to Madurai and beyond: Tamilians protest against jallikattu ban|date=18 January 2017|newspaper=The News Minute|access-date=19 January 2017}}</ref> such as in [[Sri Lanka]], the [[United Kingdom]], [[Germany]], [[Australia]], [[New Zealand]], [[Singapore]], [[Malaysia]], [[Canada]], [[China]], [[Russia]], [[Switzerland]], [[Ireland]], [[Japan]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.maalaimalar.com/News/TopNews/2017/01/21124548/1063381/Jallikattu-enthusiasts-protest-in-tokyo.vpf|title=ஜப்பானையும் தாக்கிய ஜல்லிக்கட்டு சுனாமி: ஆதரவாக கையெழுத்து வேட்டை|publisher= maalaimalar.com|access-date=21 January 2017}}</ref> the [[United Arab Emirates]], the [[United States]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.behindwoods.com/news-shots/jallikattu-protests-peaceful-protests-held-in-minneapolis-usa.html|title=Jallikattu Protests: Peaceful protests held in Minneapolis, USA|website=Behindwoods News Shots|access-date=19 January 2017}}</ref> [[France]], [[South Africa]],<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.timesnow.tv/india/article/makkalmovement-on-jallikattu-goes-global/54433|title=#MakkalMovement on Jallikattu Goes Global|newspaper=timesnow.tv|access-date=19 January 2017}}</ref> and [[Finland]].<ref>{{Cite video|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzk6WEFugpU|title=#Jallikattu 2017 Protests in Finland|access-date=22 January 2017}}</ref>
The protests are not just confined to [[Chennai]] but thousand gathered across the state in prominent places such as Opposite to District Collectorate and Trains in [[Salem, Tamil Nadu|Salem]],<ref>{{Cite web|date=November 18, 2017|title=Panel probing violence in jallikattu protests begins inquiry in Salem |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/salem/panel-probing-violence-in-jallikattu-protests-begins-inquiry-in-salem/articleshow/61696153.cms|access-date=2022-01-10|website=The Times of India|language=en}}</ref> MGR Circle in [[Trichy]],<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Tiruchirapalli/Jallikattu-supporters-shift-venue-then-end-protest/article17082607.ece|title=Thousands gather at MGR Circle demanding jallikattu|newspaper=The Hindu|language=en|access-date=24 January 2017}}</ref> Thamukam Grounds in [[Madurai]],<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Madurai/Thousands-gather-at-Tamukkam-demanding-jallikattu/article17055841.ece|title=Thousands gather at Tamukkam demanding jallikattu|newspaper=The Hindu|language=en|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> VOC Ground in [[Coimbatore]],<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/national/jallikattu-protests-intensify-in-coimbatore/article9492445.ece|title=Jallikattu protests intensify in Coimbatore|last=Revathy|first=LN|date=20 January 2017|newspaper=The Hindu Business Line|language=en|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> VOC Ground-[[Tirunelveli]], VOC Ground in [[Erode]],<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-tamilnadu/We-want-jallikattu-ban-PETA-say-citizens-in-one-voice/article17058086.ece|title=We want jallikattu, ban PETA, say citizens in one voice|work= The Hindu|date=19 January 2017|access-date=19 January 2017}}</ref> [[Vellore Fort]] in [[Vellore]],<ref>{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/madurai/protest-in-vellore-gathered-at-fort-flay-centre-state-failure/articleshow/56660159.cms|title=Protest in Vellore: Gathered at fort, flay Centre, state failure|work= Times of India|access-date=19 January 2017}}</ref> [[Nagercoil]], [[Thanjavur]]<ref>{{Cite web|date=2017-01-23|title=Jallikattu back in Tamil Nadu, claims 2 lives|url=https://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/current-affairs/230117/jallikattu-back-in-tamil-nadu.html|access-date=2022-01-10|website=Deccan Chronicle|language=en}}</ref> and [[Pondicherry|Puducherry]]. Tamil youths from other states express solidarity with jallikattu protesters in Tamil Nadu. There was demonstration in [[Bengaluru]],<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/bengaluru/2017/jan/19/karnataka-tamil-youth-express-solidarity-with-jallikattu-protestors-across-the-border-1561350.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170123074259/http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/bengaluru/2017/jan/19/karnataka-tamil-youth-express-solidarity-with-jallikattu-protestors-across-the-border-1561350.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=23 January 2017|title=Karnataka Tamil youth express solidarity with Jallikattu protestors across the border|newspaper=newindianexpress.com|language=en|access-date=19 January 2017}}</ref> [[Mumbai]],<ref name="DNA Human chain" /> [[Ahmedabad]],<ref>{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ahmedabad/group-protests-ban-on-jallikattu/articleshow/56674219.cms|title=Group protests ban on jallikattu|newspaper=indiatimes.com|language=en|access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> and [[Delhi]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-mumbai-s-tamils-form-human-chain-to-support-jallikattu-2293876|title=Delhi Tamilians came together to save Tamil tradition|date=19 January 2017|publisher=newindianexpress.com|accessdate=20 January 2017}}</ref> Support for the protest also came from Tamils around the world<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thenewsminute.com/article/london-madurai-and-beyond-tamilians-protest-against-jallikattu-ban-55897|title=From London to Madurai and beyond: Tamilians protest against jallikattu ban|date=18 January 2017|newspaper=The News Minute|access-date=19 January 2017}}</ref> such as in [[Sri Lanka]], the [[United Kingdom]], [[Germany]], [[Australia]], [[New Zealand]], [[Singapore]], [[Malaysia]], [[Canada]], [[China]], [[Russia]], [[Switzerland]], [[Ireland]], [[Japan]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.maalaimalar.com/News/TopNews/2017/01/21124548/1063381/Jallikattu-enthusiasts-protest-in-tokyo.vpf|title=ஜப்பானையும் தாக்கிய ஜல்லிக்கட்டு சுனாமி: ஆதரவாக கையெழுத்து வேட்டை|date=21 January 2017|publisher= maalaimalar.com|access-date=21 January 2017}}</ref> the [[United Arab Emirates]], the [[United States]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.behindwoods.com/news-shots/jallikattu-protests-peaceful-protests-held-in-minneapolis-usa.html|title=Jallikattu Protests: Peaceful protests held in Minneapolis, USA|website=Behindwoods News Shots|date=18 January 2017|access-date=19 January 2017}}</ref> [[France]], [[South Africa]],<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.timesnow.tv/india/article/makkalmovement-on-jallikattu-goes-global/54433|title=#MakkalMovement on Jallikattu Goes Global|newspaper=timesnow.tv|access-date=19 January 2017}}</ref> and [[Finland]].<ref>{{Cite video|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzk6WEFugpU|title=#Jallikattu 2017 Protests in Finland|access-date=22 January 2017}}</ref>


The protest was primarily coordinated using social media apps.{{such as?|reason=Vague what this means. Do we even care about this?|date=January 2017}} The use of memes<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/jallikattu-protest-chennai-tamil-nadu-marina-beach-bulltaming-sport-4479722/|title=Jallikattu protests: Leaderless on Marina Beach, they kept the leaders away|date=19 January 2017|newspaper=The Indian Express|language=en|access-date=19 January 2017}}</ref> has been another feature to spread the message that adds satire and humor to the protests. Various traditional Tamil sports such as [[Silambam|Silambattam]], [[Stilts|stilt]] performances and street plays are performed to showcase Tamil pride along with speeches to inspire the crowd.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/protests-for-jallikattu-turn-mass-pageant-of-tamil-pride/articleshow/56690347.cms|title=Protests for jallikattu turn mass pageant of Tamil pride|newspaper=The Times of India|access-date=21 January 2017}}</ref>
The protest was primarily coordinated using social media apps.{{example needed|reason=Vague what this means. Do we even care about this?|date=January 2017}} The use of memes<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/jallikattu-protest-chennai-tamil-nadu-marina-beach-bulltaming-sport-4479722/|title=Jallikattu protests: Leaderless on Marina Beach, they kept the leaders away|date=19 January 2017|newspaper=The Indian Express|language=en|access-date=19 January 2017}}</ref> has been another feature to spread the message that adds satire and humor to the protests. Various traditional Tamil sports such as [[Silambam|Silambattam]], [[Stilts|stilt]] performances and street plays are performed to showcase Tamil pride along with speeches to inspire the crowd.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/protests-for-jallikattu-turn-mass-pageant-of-tamil-pride/articleshow/56690347.cms|title=Protests for jallikattu turn mass pageant of Tamil pride|newspaper=The Times of India|access-date=21 January 2017}}</ref>


Slogans were shouted against the animal rights organization PETA, alleging an international conspiracy favoring extinction of Tamil Nadu's rare cattle breed, and replacing them with [[Jersey cows]] from Denmark and Switzerland.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil-nadu/2017/jan/17/detained-protestors-go-on-fast-for-jallikattu-as-alanganallur-fights-on-1560479--1.html|title=Detained protestors go on fast for jallikattu as Alanganallur fights on|accessdate=19 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/more-than-60-jersey-cows-from-switzerland-arrive-in-chennai/articleshow/56653373.cms|title=More than 60 Jersey cows from Switzerland arrive in Chennai|accessdate=19 January 2017}}</ref><ref>http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/tamil-nadu-imports-540-jersey-cows-from-switzerland/articleshow/56643976.cms</ref>
Slogans were shouted against the animal rights organization PETA, alleging an international conspiracy favoring extinction of Tamil Nadu's rare cattle breed, and replacing them with [[Jersey cows]] from Denmark and Switzerland.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil-nadu/2017/jan/17/detained-protestors-go-on-fast-for-jallikattu-as-alanganallur-fights-on-1560479--1.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170119053325/http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil-nadu/2017/jan/17/detained-protestors-go-on-fast-for-jallikattu-as-alanganallur-fights-on-1560479--1.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=19 January 2017|title=Detained protestors go on fast for jallikattu as Alanganallur fights on|accessdate=19 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/more-than-60-jersey-cows-from-switzerland-arrive-in-chennai/articleshow/56653373.cms|title=More than 60 Jersey cows from Switzerland arrive in Chennai|website=[[The Times of India]]|accessdate=19 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/tamil-nadu-imports-540-jersey-cows-from-switzerland/articleshow/56643976.cms |title=Tamil Nadu imports 540 jersey cows from Switzerland |website=timesofindia.indiatimes.com |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170120202214/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/tamil-nadu-imports-540-jersey-cows-from-switzerland/articleshow/56643976.cms |archive-date=2017-01-20}}</ref>


== Impact ==
== Impact ==
Line 94: Line 94:
# Traders and various colleges in Tamil Nadu have called for the ban on aerated multi-national brands like Pepsi and Coca-Cola with effect from 1 March 2017<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.news18.com/news/india/tamil-nadu-traders-to-boycott-coke-pepsi-from-march-1341443.html|title=Tamil Nadu Traders to Boycott Coke, Pepsi From March|date=27 January 2017|newspaper=News18|access-date=27 January 2017}}</ref> and replace them with localised drinks like tender coconut and fresh juices.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/tamil-nadu-traders-body-to-stop-sales-of-pepsi-coke-117012501220_1.html|title=Tamil Nadu traders body to stop sales of Pepsi, Coke|last=Babu|first=Gireesh|date=26 January 2017|newspaper=Business Standard India|access-date=27 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/cons-products/food/tamil-nadu-traders-to-boycott-coca-cola-pepsico-products-from-march-1/articleshow/56799928.cms|title=Rs 1,400 crore may fizz out of Coca-Cola, PepsiCo coffers as Tamil Nadu traders mulling to ban products|newspaper=The Economic Times|access-date=27 January 2017}}</ref>
# Traders and various colleges in Tamil Nadu have called for the ban on aerated multi-national brands like Pepsi and Coca-Cola with effect from 1 March 2017<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.news18.com/news/india/tamil-nadu-traders-to-boycott-coke-pepsi-from-march-1341443.html|title=Tamil Nadu Traders to Boycott Coke, Pepsi From March|date=27 January 2017|newspaper=News18|access-date=27 January 2017}}</ref> and replace them with localised drinks like tender coconut and fresh juices.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/tamil-nadu-traders-body-to-stop-sales-of-pepsi-coke-117012501220_1.html|title=Tamil Nadu traders body to stop sales of Pepsi, Coke|last=Babu|first=Gireesh|date=26 January 2017|newspaper=Business Standard India|access-date=27 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/cons-products/food/tamil-nadu-traders-to-boycott-coca-cola-pepsico-products-from-march-1/articleshow/56799928.cms|title=Rs 1,400 crore may fizz out of Coca-Cola, PepsiCo coffers as Tamil Nadu traders mulling to ban products|newspaper=The Economic Times|access-date=27 January 2017}}</ref>
# Poor public turn out on the Republic day parade in Chennai, condemning the Police charge on the students.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.ndtv.com/chennai-news/republic-day-attendance-thin-for-parade-at-chennais-marina-beach-road-1653051|title=Republic Day: Attendance Thin For Parade at Chennai's Marina Beach Road|newspaper=NDTV.com|access-date=27 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/chennai/Poor-turnout-on-Republic-Day-proves-a-dampener/article17099141.ece|title=Poor turnout on Republic Day proves a dampener|last=Sivaraman|first=R.|newspaper=The Hindu|language=en|access-date=27 January 2017}}</ref>
# Poor public turn out on the Republic day parade in Chennai, condemning the Police charge on the students.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.ndtv.com/chennai-news/republic-day-attendance-thin-for-parade-at-chennais-marina-beach-road-1653051|title=Republic Day: Attendance Thin For Parade at Chennai's Marina Beach Road|newspaper=NDTV.com|access-date=27 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/chennai/Poor-turnout-on-Republic-Day-proves-a-dampener/article17099141.ece|title=Poor turnout on Republic Day proves a dampener|last=Sivaraman|first=R.|newspaper=The Hindu|language=en|access-date=27 January 2017}}</ref>
# Declaration of Marina as out of bounds for future protests.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/chennai/2017/jan/27/police-warns-of-action-against-those-who-illegally-congregate-in-marina-beach-1564181.html|title=Police warns of action against those who illegally congregate in Marina beach|newspaper=The New Indian Express|access-date=28 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/jallikattu-row-police-warns-of-action-against-those-who-illegally-congregate-in-marina-beach/525565/|title=Jallikattu Row: Police warns of action against those who illegally congregate in Marina Beach|date=28 January 2017|newspaper=The Financial Express|language=en-US|access-date=28 January 2017}}</ref>
# Declaration of Marina as out of bounds for future protests.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/chennai/2017/jan/27/police-warns-of-action-against-those-who-illegally-congregate-in-marina-beach-1564181.html|title=Police warns of action against those who illegally congregate in Marina beach|newspaper=The New Indian Express|access-date=28 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/jallikattu-row-police-warns-of-action-against-those-who-illegally-congregate-in-marina-beach/525565/|title=Jallikattu Row: Police warns of action against those who illegally congregate in Marina Beach|date=28 January 2017|newspaper=The Financial Express|language=en-US|access-date=28 January 2017}}</ref>


== References ==
== References ==
Line 105: Line 105:
[[Category:January 2017 events in India]]
[[Category:January 2017 events in India]]
[[Category:Student protests in India]]
[[Category:Student protests in India]]
[[Category:Jallikattu]]

Latest revision as of 19:38, 16 November 2024

2017 pro-jallikattu protests
Jallikattu protesters gathering at Chennai Marina Beach
Date8 January 2017 (2017-01-08) – 23 January 2017 (2017-01-23)[1]
(15 days)
Location
Caused bySupreme Court's ban against jallikattu
Goals
  • Revoke the ban on jallikattu
  • Ban PETA[2]
Methodspicketing, sloganeering, human chain,[3] silent protest, hunger strike, demonstration, internet activism, candlelight vigil[4]
Resulted inTamil Nadu state legislation passed bill legalising jallikattu[5]
Number
> 1 million[6]
Casualties
Injuries> 60[7]

The 2017 pro-jallikattu protests, also known as the pro-jallikattu movement, were leaderless apolitical youth protests which took place in January 2017 in large groups in several locations across the Indian state of Tamil Nadu. Some sporadic smaller protests also took place across India[8] as well as overseas.[9][10] The chief motivation of the protest was against the Supreme Court's order to ban jallikattu (occasionally also known as sallikattu, eru taluval and manju virattu),[11] a traditional Tamil bull taming sport, which is held during Pongal, a harvest festival in the state of Tamil Nadu, India.[12] The sport is conducted annually on the second day of the Tamil month Thai. The sport was banned by the Supreme Court in a decision citing cruelty to animals based on a lawsuit filed by the animal rights group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA),[13] which asserted that it violates the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act (PCA).[14]

The first large protests occurred on 8 January 2017, when several groups, organised largely via social media, conducted a protest at the Marina beach in Chennai to revoke the ban on jallikattu which was imposed in 2014. These groups also demanded that PETA be banned from India.[15] The protests soon gained momentum and spread all over Tamil Nadu.[16] After several days of protests, jallikattu was finally legalised locally on 23 January when the Government of Tamil Nadu passed a bill to amend the PCA Act.[17] As the legalisation is not Indian federal law, but rather state law, there is concern from Indian legal experts that jallikattu could be banned once again by the Supreme Court.[18][19]

The largely peaceful nature of the protests received praise from all over the country and inspired the legalisation movements of several other Indian states' traditional outlawed celebrations.[20][21] Despite violence on 23 January, this perception continued after the Tamil Nadu Police[22] reported that the violence was caused by "anti-social elements" co-opting the protest, and not the student protesters themselves.[23][vague][24][25][26] The movement has been described as a symbol for Tamil pride and has largely been compared to the anti-Hindi agitations of Tamil Nadu and dubbed by many as 'Thai Puratchi'.[27][28]

Background

[edit]

Jallikattu is a traditional bull taming event wherein a berserk bull is released into a crowd, and the participants of the crowd individually attempt to grab and hold on to the bull's hump for a determined distance, a determined time, or with the goal of removing a packet of money tied to the bull's horns.[29] The sport, which is considered to be 2500–10,000 years old,[30] is usually held during Thai Pongal across several locations in Tamil Nadu,[31] with the primary event being held in Alanganallur.[32] During the event, injuries or even death often occur to participants.[33] While bull breeders contend that the participating bulls are treated well,[34] PETA asserts its investigators found that the bulls suffers cruel treatment, from having their tails twisted, being stabbed, punched and jumped on.[35] India's Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act (PCAA) outlaws animal cruelty, and sets up the punishment offenders can expect to receive. The Madras High Court was the first to rule that jallikattu was not allowable under the PCAA in 2006.[36] However, traditional sports like jallikattu have since then always been allowed through various legal and extralegal means, the most recent of which is the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Jallikattu Act No 27, passed by the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly and signed into law in 2009.[35]

In January 2011, Hema Malini appealed to the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoE) to ban Jallikatu, and it responded by issuing a notification that bulls may no longer be used as performing animals in India, adding it to a list which previously included only bears, monkeys, tigers, panthers and lions.[37] Armed with this, in April 2011, PETA announced that it would challenge the 2009 Tamil Nadu law as unconstitutional, as it now conflicts with the Indian federal law.[38] After three years in court, on 7 May 2014, PETA, represented by Raj Panjwani, along with the Animal Welfare Board of India (AWBI), striking down the 2009 Tamil Nadu law.[35] In defiance of the ban, citizens of Tamil Nadu attempted to carry out the tradition on 18 January 2015, but police arrested forty six people and allowed the animals to go free.[39]

In preparation for the 2016 jallikattu season, the Centre reversed its earlier decision and on 7 January 2016 MoE once again removed bulls from the list of banned performing animals.[40] Justices Dipak Misra and Rohinton Fali Nariman were highly critical of this reaction, and were quoted by The Hindu as stating jointly:[41] "How can you negate our judgment banning jallikattu by coming up with the January 2016 notification allowing bulls to participate in the sport again? [...] We cannot import Roman gladiator-type sport here." The Supreme Court issued a stay order on 12 January 2016, effectively banning the sport just five days after the Centre unbanned it.[42][43] With the police on their side this time, however, jallikattu went ahead anyway, and thousands gathered to watch bull races and the main sport.[44][45]

In preparation for the 2017 season, once again multiple petitions were filed to try to get the Supreme Court to reconsider; and once again they were all denied, including a petition attempting to argue a religious freedom angle.[46] The Supreme Court once again sparred with the Centre, who was trying to get it unbanned as it was a 5,000-year-old cultural tradition of the Tamil people, but the court responded simply "In 1899, ten thousand girls below 12 years of age were married. Should we allow it today because it was a tradition at that time?" and rejected the petition.[47] For the 2017 season, political tension was high, perhaps sparking the massive protest: people blamed the AIADMK and BJP political parties for failing to reverse the ban during the last three years. Once again, citizens flouted the Supreme Court, and jallikattu went ahead despite its legal status.[48] With an uncooperative judiciary, the other branches of government began work on a law which would override the court's decision: on 19 January 2017, prime minister of India Narendra Modi vowed to support Tamil Nadu but declined to give further details, claiming that he could not as the case was currently sub judice.[49] In an interview, former Supreme Court justice Markandey Katju observed that laws can be changed even when the matter is in court as was done for the act that abolished zamindari in the 1950s when the Nehru government removed the right to property as a fundamental right.[50]

Support

[edit]

Jallikattu is cited as one of the last available ways to promote and preserve[51][52] the native livestock because the other uses of native breeds such as ploughing, breeding via mating and milk is on decline due to advancement in mechanization by tractors, improvement in artificial insemination and hybrid Jersey cows respectively.[52] Native breed activists claim that Tamil Nadu had over one million Kangayam bulls in 1990 and that the population has fallen to 15,000 by the 2010s.[51][52] Minor protests were initiated by cattle rights activists and farmers. Music videos, such as "Takkaru Takkaru" by Hiphop Tamizha, and on Facebook videos to talk about jallikattu and its benefits inspired the protestors.[53][54][55] There were also claims that the indigenous cattle bulls are critically endangered in Tamil Nadu and banning jallikattu will have the adverse effect of wiping them out completely.[56][57] According to pro-jallikattu activists, jallikattu is not just a sport that is deeply entrenched in Tamil culture, but it has also inadvertently served as a scientific method of breeding cattle.[clarification needed] This view is held among a majority of jallikattu supporters.[58][59] The protest is aimed at revival of the native humped bull, called the zebu. The Tamil Nadu breed of zebu is unique to India and has several advantages compared to European varieties of cattle such as the Holstein cow. The native breeds are rich in the A2 variety of beta casein protein which aides easy digestion whereas milk from European Bos taurus contain the A1 variant of the beta casein protein which is related to allergies and some serious health conditions.[60] The Holstein breeds found their way into India as a result of Operation Flood of late 1960s through cross breeding to increase the low milk yield of native breeds. As the Jersey cow can yield nine times the quantity of milk as a zebu in the same period, there is concern among protesters that without jallikattu providing an economic incentive for the breeding of zebu, the breed will become endangered and eventually extinct.[34] PETA disputes the allegation that outlawing jallikattu would lead to a loss of the Tamil Nadu zebu, stating that the bulls can still be used as studs regardless of whether jallikattu is legal or not.[61]

Support from various groups, including film actors, politicians, cricketers and other sportsmen, social activists, and authors. Raghava Lawrence, actor Silambarasan, director V. Gowthaman, Seeman, Samuthirakani, Ameer, RJ Balaji, Aari, Mansoor Ali Khan and G. V. Prakash Kumar took part actively during the protests. Spiritual leaders like Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, and Sadhuguru Jaggi Vasudev[62] also spoke in support of the sport.[63] The protestors rejected any attempt for leadership by politicians and celebrities and wished to remain a leaderless mass movement.

On 19 January 2017, film composer A. R. Rahman announced that he will observe a day-long fast in support of the protesters, and for 'Tamil Nadu's spirit'.[62]

Opposition

[edit]

The main opposition of jallikattu comes from the Indian branch of the international non-governmental organization People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA). PETA's opposition is also shared by the Animal Welfare Board of India (AWBI), Federation of Indian Animal Protection Organisations and Compassion Unlimited Plus Action (CUPA).[64][65] Judges of the Supreme Court of India have likewise criticized the Indian Central Government's support of jallikattu just because it is a tradition and have voiced their opposition of it.[41] The Supreme has held that the sport is inherently cruel in nature and this deprives the animal of its basic right to live without subject to fear and torture. The judgement also clarifies that the sport is neither religious ritual nor an essential sport for the Tamil community as the sport is played only in few districts of central Tamil Nadu and not in all districts. The sport has claimed multiple lives including those of the tamers, onlookers and the police. The first ban on jallikattu was a result of a case filed by the father of a tamer who lost his life in the event.

PETA denies that ending the jallikattu event will lead to the loss of the native bull, and has pointed out that bulls can be used as studs regardless of whether or not they are engaged in jallikattu. Furthermore, PETA claims that veterinarians can determine which bulls are healthiest with far more scientific rigor than jallikattu can.[61]

Timeline

[edit]
Thousands of people protesting on Marina Beach in Chennai
Women protesting at Vivekananda House in Chennai
Students use their mobile phone flashlights to illuminate their protest after street lights are turned off by power company TNEB.
Students use their mobile phone flashlights to illuminate their protest after street lights are turned off by power company TNEB.
Protesters in Jantar Mantar, New Delhi

Sporadic demonstrations began on 4 January,[66] but mass protests did not begin until two weeks later.

On 16 January 2017, villagers of Alanganallur protested at Alanganallur 'Vaadi vaasal' – The Arena, the place known for the jallikattu sport – on that date, the sport was also practiced in defiance of the ban.[48] After a day long protest, police arrested the protesters numbering around 200[67] in Madurai. On 17 January 2017, In support of the arrested, Students gathered in Marina Beach.[68] This day incidentally coincided with the birth centenary of former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.G.Ramachadran. The crowds started swelling for the night and few hundred spent their night in beach and the crowds continued to gather strength throughout the next day. The protest erupted around the state including Salem, Erode, Coimbatore, Nagercoil, Thiruchrapalli, Pudhuchery. On 19 January, many volunteer groups and individuals once again gathered at the Marina beach for overnight protests.[69] deputy Tamil Nadu Chief Minister O.Paneerselvam met Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and pushed for an ordinance. With no sign of protests relenting the centre suggested ordinance by Tamil Nadu Government. On 20 January, The draft ordinance was approved by Home, Environmental and Cultural Ministry.

On 20 January, the chief minister of Tamil Nadu announced that a law has been drafted and sent to the Central Government, stating, "There are full chances that jallikattu will be organised within 1–2 days."[70] The Hindustan Times reported that the Centre approved the bill without recommending any changes, and that all that remains now is for it to be signed by the President of India, Pranab Mukherjee.[71] On this day the Marina beach Witnessed around 20 lakh[72] protesters on peaceful Occupy Marina protest alone with lacs thronging various cities of state.. The day witnessed a virtual shutdown in the state as most organization downed their shutters expressing solidarity for the cause.[73][74] The Opposition party Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) staged Rail Roko in district headquarters of the state.[75][76]

On 21 January, the protests still continue demanding a permanent solution. Some politicians of the opposition parties started fasting as a sign of protest.[77] The State Government promulgated the ordinance and announced that it would conduct the event the next day.[78] However the protesters refused to budge, as they believe the ordinance has very weak legal grounds and could be overturned in much the same way as the Supreme Court overturned the 2009 ordinance.[79][80]

On 22 January, the government tried to conduct the sport despite the opposition from the local people in Alanganallur and other parts of Tamil Nadu who demanded a permanent resolution which can ensure jallikattu for generations to come.[81] The protesters had successfully blocked the sport from being conducted as Government festival. However a jallikattu event was organised and held at Pudukottai without proper safety measures on a very short notice and was inaugurated by the government minister, which eventually killed two people and many were left injured.[82]

On 23 January, with protesters refusing to budge, police began early morning forceful evictions, moving people by hand and also employing batons.[83] Protesters at the marina threatened to venture into the sea, but eventually most protesters were removed and access to the protest site was cut off.[84] The evictions led to further protesters and threaten to boycott the upcoming Republic Day celebrations in Chennai beach.[84][85][86][where?] The entire city came to standstill with protesters blocking major roads and incidents of stone pelting[87] torching of vehicles, police stations[88] and petrol bombs were thrown whose identity remain unknown.[89] There have also been reports of police involving in burning of autos and vehicles. The videos of cop setting fire on vehicles and involving in arson have been going viral in social media.[90][91] The initial organizers of protests called for calm and few including actors condemned the violence and the subsequent crackdown.[92] At the end of day most of protests were either withdrawn evacuated or forcefully at all places including at Marina Beach, Madurai, Salem, Erode and Coimbatore and normalcy started to be restored.[93]

On 24 January, according to the Times of India, the majority of student protestors in Chennai decided to call off their protest after a dialogue with police and a district court judge, viewing the Tamil Nadu ordinance and planned law as a victory, but promised to restart it if there was no permanent solution for jallikattu by 1 February.[94]

The legal situation surrounding jallikattu is as yet not clearly resolved. While the Tamil Nadu government has claimed that its draft ordinance is a "permanent solution",[80] many jallikattu supporters view it as merely being a "stop gap measure".[18][19] As ordinances only last for six months, the Tamil Nadu Assembly plans to make the ordinance into state law "immediately".[95] Some, however such as Ministry of External Affairs cabinet minister Salman Khurshid, have stated that the matter will only be truly resolved if the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act is amended as local ordinances and state laws cannot trump Indian federal law.[18] According to The Hindu, many other Indian legal experts agreed with Khurshid's view, as federal laws such as the PCA are always more powerful than state laws, and in that respect the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act of 2017 is not much different from the 2009 one.[19] On 24 January, in light of the new Tamil Nadu legislation, the Centre withdrew its notification allowing the sport; this means that any new legal challenges will be directed against the new legislation.[96] For its part, PETA India has said that it will "study" the new ordinance, and has not ruled out a challenge to the new law on the same grounds as it challenged the 2009 law.[97] On 25 January, the Animal Welfare Board of India (AWBI) restarted the legal process by formally challenging the new law before the Supreme Court,[98][99] but it withdrew the petition the next day.[100] According to the AWBI's acting chairperson, AWBI does not plan to re-file the petition, but he claimed no knowledge of what other organizations, such as PETA, may do.[100]

On 6 July 2017, PETA India released a YouTube video showing the results of their investigation of five Jallikattu events which took place across Tamil Nadu in February 2017.[101] According to PETA, their investigation showed abuse of the animals during the February events, including the tails of bulls being bitten and twisted, collapsed bulls being pulled by ropes attached to their noses, and bulls having their tailbones purposefully broken.[102] In an interview with The Hindu, organisers of the events denied the claims of PETA.[103] On 7 July 2017, PETA filed a petition with the Supreme Court of India seeking a renewed ban on Jallikattu via the invalidation of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act of 2017 as unconstitutional.[104][105]

On 2 February 2018, the Supreme Court of India accepted PETA's petition, referring the case to its constitution bench.[106]

Demands from the protesters

[edit]

Major demands

[edit]
  • To declare an ordinance to ensure the removal of 'bulls' from the 'list of performing animals' as per the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal (PCA) Act (1960).[107]
  • To seek permanent solution for jallikattu, by passing a permanent act to conduct jallikattu every year.
  • To ban People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) in India.

Other demands

[edit]
  • Boycott of foreign companies such as Pepsi, Coca-Cola as their water consumption is affecting local farmers.[citation needed][108]

Nature of protest

[edit]

The protests were spontaneous[109] and had no specific organizers. The protest started as Occupy Marina protest along with sit-ins at large grounds across the state. The protests were initially formed by members of Student community across the state which was further strengthened by people from various sections such as IT professionals[110] who joined later. The lack of leader was seen as stumbling block for the state government because it could not call people for talks. The protest were largely peaceful except few Baton charge by the police.

The protests are not just confined to Chennai but thousand gathered across the state in prominent places such as Opposite to District Collectorate and Trains in Salem,[111] MGR Circle in Trichy,[112] Thamukam Grounds in Madurai,[113] VOC Ground in Coimbatore,[114] VOC Ground-Tirunelveli, VOC Ground in Erode,[115] Vellore Fort in Vellore,[116] Nagercoil, Thanjavur[117] and Puducherry. Tamil youths from other states express solidarity with jallikattu protesters in Tamil Nadu. There was demonstration in Bengaluru,[118] Mumbai,[3] Ahmedabad,[119] and Delhi.[120] Support for the protest also came from Tamils around the world[121] such as in Sri Lanka, the United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, Malaysia, Canada, China, Russia, Switzerland, Ireland, Japan,[122] the United Arab Emirates, the United States,[123] France, South Africa,[124] and Finland.[125]

The protest was primarily coordinated using social media apps.[example needed] The use of memes[126] has been another feature to spread the message that adds satire and humor to the protests. Various traditional Tamil sports such as Silambattam, stilt performances and street plays are performed to showcase Tamil pride along with speeches to inspire the crowd.[127]

Slogans were shouted against the animal rights organization PETA, alleging an international conspiracy favoring extinction of Tamil Nadu's rare cattle breed, and replacing them with Jersey cows from Denmark and Switzerland.[128][129][130]

Impact

[edit]

The Marina Protest had varied impacts in different walks of life:

  1. The legalization of Jallikattu[131] by the student protest gave impetus to a similar student protest in the neighboring state, Karnataka for the support of conducting their traditional buffalo race, 'kambala' and banning of PETA,[132] Andhra Pradesh in support of special status.[133][134]
  2. Traders and various colleges in Tamil Nadu have called for the ban on aerated multi-national brands like Pepsi and Coca-Cola with effect from 1 March 2017[135] and replace them with localised drinks like tender coconut and fresh juices.[136][137]
  3. Poor public turn out on the Republic day parade in Chennai, condemning the Police charge on the students.[138][139]
  4. Declaration of Marina as out of bounds for future protests.[140][141]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Jallikattu: Protests Over, We Got What We Wanted, Says Marina Beach Students To NDTV". NDTV. 23 January 2017.
  2. ^ "Explained: Demands Made By Jallikattu Supporters". Times Now. 22 January 2017.
  3. ^ a b "Mumbai's Tamils form human chain to support Jallikattu – Latest News & Updates at Daily News & Analysis". 19 January 2017. Retrieved 19 January 2017.
  4. ^ "Jallikattu Ban Hurts Tamil Pride, State Erupts in Massive Protests, Celebrities Join In". indiatimes.com. 18 January 2017. Retrieved 18 January 2017.
  5. ^ "Jallikattu Now Legal in Tamil Nadu, Assembly Passes Bill Unanimously". Times Now. 23 January 2017.
  6. ^ Soutik, Biswas (20 January 2017). "Why India bull-taming protest may not be just about bulls". BBC News. India. Retrieved 21 January 2017. :more than a million people are estimated to have protested across Tamil Nadu on Friday
  7. ^ Pushpa, Narayan (23 January 2017). "Jallikattu protests: 60 admitted to govt hospitals in Chennai". Times of India News. Retrieved 23 January 2017. Around 60 people, including 33 policemen, were admitted to state-run hospitals as pro-jallikattu protests turned violent in Chennai.
  8. ^ "Tamil lawyers, students protest against Jallikattu ban in Delhi". The Indian Express. 19 January 2017. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  9. ^ Overseas support for Jallikattu as Tamils in London stage protests near the Indian embassy (YouTube video), 17 January 2017, retrieved 20 January 2017
  10. ^ "From London to Madurai and beyond: Tamilians protest against jallikattu ban". The News Minute. 18 January 2017. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  11. ^ Ramakrishnan, T. "Governor clears ordinance on 'jallikattu'". The Hindu. Retrieved 23 February 2017.
  12. ^ "Protests flare in southern India over Jallikattu ban". www.aljazeera.com. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  13. ^ "PETA: Jallikattu stay 'partial victory' for bulls". The Hindu. Retrieved 23 February 2017.
  14. ^ "Supreme Court turns down plea to allow bull-taming sport Jallikattu before Pongal". The Times of India. 12 January 2017. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  15. ^ "Jallikattu: Supporters organise rally in Chennai for seeking permission to hold bull-taming sport". 8 January 2017. Retrieved 19 January 2017.
  16. ^ "Jallikattu protest: SC allows Centre's request to not pass judgment for a week". The Indian Express. 20 January 2017. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  17. ^ B Sivakumar (23 January 2017). "Jallikattu: Tamil Nadu assembly passes bill to amend PCA Act". The Times of India.
  18. ^ a b c "Jallikattu Row: Matter could still go to Supreme Court and we could get adverse decision, says Salman Khurshid". The Financial Express. 21 January 2017. Retrieved 21 January 2017.
  19. ^ a b c "Jallikattu protesters demand permanent solution". The Hindu Business Line. 22 January 2017. Retrieved 25 January 2017.
  20. ^ "Jallikattu ban protests in Chennai calm, peaceful, clean; leave many impressed". India.com. 19 January 2017.
  21. ^ "Jallikattu 'legal', other states ramp up pressure for their outlawed sports". Hindusthan Times. 23 January 2017.
  22. ^ "Police sexually assaulted protesting women". The Hindu. Retrieved 23 February 2017.
  23. ^ "Jallikattu: 'Anti-National Elements', Not Students, Causing Chennai Violence, Say Cops". Retrieved 23 February 2017.
  24. ^ "Jallikattu protest turns violent after police eviction". The Economic Times. 23 January 2017.
  25. ^ "Jallikattu protest: Violence breaks out in Chennai, other parts of Tamil Nadu". The Times of India. 23 January 2017.
  26. ^ "Protest turns violent on Chennai's Marina Beach; vehicles torched, petrol bombs lobbed". Hindusthan Times. 23 January 2017.
  27. ^ "Protests for jallikattu turn mass pageant of Tamil pride". The Times of India. 20 January 2017.
  28. ^ Sohit Mishra (19 January 2017). "Jallikattu protests and 1965 Anti-Hindi riots: Similar at face value, different in objective". India.com.
  29. ^ Salim David (20 January 2017). "View: Blanket ban on Jallikattu would be tantamount to banning all motor cars". The Economic Times.
  30. ^ Vidya Venkat (14 January 2017). "Missing the bull's eye". The Hindu.
  31. ^ Arun Janardhanan (20 January 2017). "Taking Jallikattu bull by the horns: Protests in TN and the many legal twists and turns". The Indian Express.
  32. ^ "Jallikattu claims two lives in TN". Deccan Herald. 23 January 2017.
  33. ^ "What Is Jallikattu? All You need To Know About Tamil Nadu's Bull-Taming Tradition". NDTV.com. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  34. ^ a b Sushmitha, Ramakrishnan (21 January 2017). "Does Jallikattu really help the native breeds?". The New Indian Express. Archived from the original on 23 January 2017. Retrieved 22 January 2017.
  35. ^ a b c "Supreme Court Bans Jallikattu, Bull Races and Bullfights". PETA India. 7 May 2014. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  36. ^ Malviya, Amit (19 January 2017). "Jallikattu ban: BJP backs people of Tamil Nadu, blames UPA for depriving state of traditional sport". Firstpost. Retrieved 20 September 2020.
  37. ^ "Timeline: Jallikattu Ban And Controversy". News18. 12 January 2017. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  38. ^ "PETA Goes to Supreme Court for Jallikattu Ban". PETA India. 27 April 2011. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  39. ^ "46 arrested for violating Jallikattu ban". The Hindu. 18 January 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  40. ^ "Jallikattu: India lifts ban on bullfighting in Tamil Nadu". BBC News. 8 January 2016. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  41. ^ a b "SC questions Centre's notification supporting 'jallikattu'". The Hindu. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  42. ^ Rebello, Lara (12 January 2016). "India: Supreme Court puts a stay on Jallikattu bull taming sport". International Business Times UK. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  43. ^ "Supreme Court upholds ban on Jallikattu". DNA. 14 January 2016. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  44. ^ "Over 35 injured as building collapses during Jallikattu". The Hindu. 20 January 2016. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  45. ^ Akbar, Syed (16 January 2016). "Despite SC ban, 'Jallikattu' held in Andhra Pradesh villages". The Times of India. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  46. ^ Rajagopal, Krishnadas (2 December 2016). "Apex court refuses to lift ban on jallikattu". The Hindu. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  47. ^ Vaidyanathan, A.; Shukla, Shuchi (26 July 2016). "Jallikattu 5000-Years-Old, So What? Supreme Court's Sharp Remarks on Bull Fest". NDTV.com. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  48. ^ a b "Despite SC ban, jallikattu bulls released at Alanganallur". The New Indian Express. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  49. ^ "Modi says jallikattu is sub-judice". The Hindu. Retrieved 19 January 2017.
  50. ^ "Centre need not wait for SC order, can pass ordinance on jallikattu: Katju to TNM". The News Minute. 18 January 2017. Retrieved 19 January 2017.
  51. ^ a b Natarajan, Swaminathan (19 July 2016). "Jallikattu: Why India bullfighting ban 'threatens native breeds'". BBC News. Retrieved 21 January 2017.
  52. ^ a b c Anugula, Himakiran. "Banning Jallikattu Will Decimate India's Indigenous Cattle Breeds – The Wire". thewire.in. Retrieved 21 January 2017.
  53. ^ "Meet the campaigners behind the Jallikattu uprising". hindustantimes.com/. 19 January 2017. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  54. ^ "Senaapathy Kangayam Cattle Research Foundation – About Us". www.kangayambull.com. Retrieved 19 January 2017.
  55. ^ Rao, Subha J. "BULL Stop!". The Hindu. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  56. ^ Jalli Kattu (26 July 2016), jallikattu Karthikeya sivasenathipathi speech, retrieved 19 January 2017
  57. ^ Interview with Hip Hop Tamizha 'Aadhi' about Jallikattu, 11 January 2017, retrieved 19 January 2017
  58. ^ "Sun TV – இணைய செயற்பாட்டாளர் ராஜ்மோகன் ஜல்லிக்கட்டு பற்றிய..." www.facebook.com. Retrieved 21 January 2017.
  59. ^ "Jallikattu is not cruelty but a breeding process, say its proponents". Retrieved 21 January 2017.
  60. ^ "The deshi cow milk jinx". Retrieved 21 January 2017.
  61. ^ a b Poorva Joshipura; CEO PETA India (21 July 2016). "Clearing Up All The Bull Around Jallikattu". Huffington Post India. Retrieved 20 January 2017.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  62. ^ a b "For Jallikattu, AR Rahman To Fast, Sri Sri Ravi Shankar And Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudeva Say Ban Must End". NDTV.com. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  63. ^ "Jallikattu: Tamil Nadu celebrities step forward, offer support on social media". Firstpost. 19 January 2017. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  64. ^ "Supreme Court to examine plea against Tamil Nadu's law on Jallikattu". The Times of India. Retrieved 28 January 2017.
  65. ^ "Banned, but #StillNotSafe". FIAPO. Archived from the original on 17 January 2017. Retrieved 22 January 2017.
  66. ^ "AIADMK should take responsibility for continuous ban on jallikattu". The Times of India. Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd. 4 January 2017. Retrieved 22 January 2017.
  67. ^ "Police clear up Alanganallur arena, 220 protesters detained at 6am after night-long protests". The News Minute. 17 January 2017. Retrieved 21 January 2017.
  68. ^ "Chennai's Marina beach turns into Tahrir Square for Jallikattu democracy". The New Indian Express. Archived from the original on 20 January 2017. Retrieved 21 January 2017.
  69. ^ Iyer, Aditya (20 January 2017). "Jallikattu protesters stand firm: 'We'll go home only after SC lifts ban'". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  70. ^ Basu, Idrani (20 January 2017). "Tamil Nadu May Have Found A Way To Hold Jallikattu 'Within A Day Or Two'". Huffington Post India. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  71. ^ "Jallikattu highlights: Law, environment ministries clear TN govt ordinance; over to the President". Hindustan Times. 20 January 2017. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  72. ^ "Chennai: 20 lakh join in, Jallikattu set for tomorrow". The Indian Express. 21 January 2017. Retrieved 21 January 2017.
  73. ^ Rohit, T.K. "As jallikattu protests snowball, TN to shut down". The Hindu. Retrieved 21 January 2017.
  74. ^ "Jallikattu: Ordinance in the works, Shutdown in Tamil Nadu". Deccan Herald. 20 January 2017. Retrieved 21 January 2017.
  75. ^ "Jallikattu protest disrupts train services". The Hindu. Retrieved 21 January 2017.
  76. ^ "After 'Rail Roko', DMK begins hunger protest in support of Jallikattu". The Indian Express. 21 January 2017. Retrieved 21 January 2017.
  77. ^ "Jallikattu: Stalin begins fast". The Hindu. 21 January 2017. Retrieved 23 January 2017.
  78. ^ Ramakrishnan, T. "Governor clears ordinance on 'jallikattu'". The Hindu. Retrieved 21 January 2017.
  79. ^ Shekhar, Kumar Shakti (20 January 2017). "Supreme Court can quash Jallikattu Ordinance: Congress Manish Tewari warns against promulgation in hurry". India Today. Retrieved 25 January 2017.
  80. ^ a b Iyer, Aditya (22 January 2017). "TN govt dubs Jallikattu ordinance 'permanent' remedy, to introduce law on Monday". The Hindustan Times. Retrieved 25 January 2017.
  81. ^ "Jallikattu: Red flag over Tamil Nadu but what the fight really is for?". The Economic Times. Retrieved 22 January 2017.
  82. ^ "2 dead, 28 injured in jallikattu in Tamil Nadu". The Times of India. Retrieved 22 January 2017.
  83. ^ "Police starts evicting protesters from Marina Beach". Business Standard India. 23 January 2017. Retrieved 23 January 2017.
  84. ^ a b "Jallikattu: Police cordon off Chennais Marina Beach, evict protesters from site". Retrieved 23 January 2017.
  85. ^ Narasimhan, T. E. (23 January 2017). "Jallikattu: Evicted from Marina beach, protestors to boycott Republic Day". Business Standard India. Retrieved 23 January 2017.
  86. ^ "Jallikattu protesters evicted by Tamil Nadu police from Marina Beach, other places". Hindustan Times. 23 January 2017. Retrieved 23 January 2017.
  87. ^ "Arson, stone pelting, violence: These pictures of Jallikattu protests will stun you". The Indian Express. 23 January 2017. Retrieved 23 January 2017.
  88. ^ "Jallikattu protests turn violent: Protesters torch vehicles near Ice House Police Station, refuse to leave Chennai's Marina Beach". Retrieved 23 January 2017.
  89. ^ "Protest turns violent on Chennai's Marina Beach; vehicles torched, petrol bombs lobbed". Hindustan Times. 23 January 2017. Retrieved 23 January 2017.
  90. ^ "Video of Cop Setting Auto on Fire, Allegedly in Chennai, Goes Viral". NDTV.com. Retrieved 23 January 2017.
  91. ^ "Shocking videos from TN: Cops indulging in vandalism, mob violence towards police". The News Minute. 23 January 2017. Retrieved 23 January 2017.
  92. ^ "Jallikattu agitation: Actor Kamal Haasan tells protesters to be calm". NewsX. 23 January 2017. Retrieved 23 January 2017.
  93. ^ "Jallikattu protests end on peaceful note". The Hindu. Retrieved 23 January 2017.
  94. ^ "Peaceful end to jallikattu protest despite bid to stir trouble". The Times of India. Retrieved 25 January 2017.
  95. ^ "Bill to replace ordinance on Jallikattu to be placed in Tamil Nadu Assembly immediately: Governor". The Indian Express. 23 January 2017. Retrieved 25 January 2017.
  96. ^ "Centre withdraws 2016 notification on jallikattu". The Hindu. 24 January 2017. Retrieved 25 January 2017.
  97. ^ "Jallikattu reflects poorly on India: PETA India CEO after 'bullying'". The Hindustan Times. 23 January 2017. Retrieved 25 January 2017.
  98. ^ Soni, Anusha (25 January 2017). "Tamil Nadu's new jallikattu law challenged in Supreme Court". India Today. Retrieved 27 January 2017.
  99. ^ "Jallikattu challenged again in Supreme Court by animal rights body". The New Indian Express. 25 January 2017. Archived from the original on 25 January 2017. Retrieved 27 January 2017.
  100. ^ a b "AWBI to withdraw plea against TN Jallikattu law". News Today. 26 January 2017. Archived from the original on 26 January 2017. Retrieved 28 January 2017.
  101. ^ PETA Investigates Jallikattu – February 2017 (YouTube video). 6 July 2017.
  102. ^ "Shocking New Jallikattu Investigation Leads PETA Back to Supreme Court". PETA India. 6 July 2017. Retrieved 8 July 2017.
  103. ^ Arunachalam, Pon Vasanth (6 July 2017). "Jallikattu organisers deny PETA's claims". The Hindu. Retrieved 8 July 2017.
  104. ^ Arulappan, Vinodh (7 July 2017). "PETA moves Supreme Court challenging validity of Act that paved way for jallikattu". The New Indian Express. Retrieved 8 July 2017.
  105. ^ "PETA moves Supreme Court against amendments in law to allow jallikattu". Firstpost. 6 July 2017. Retrieved 8 July 2017.
  106. ^ Rajagopal, Krishnadas (2 February 2018). "Supreme Court refers jallikattu challenge to Constitution Bench". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 16 December 2018.
  107. ^ "Jallikattu row: Remove 'bulls' from list of performing animals, urge AIADMK MPs". The Indian Express. 11 January 2017. Retrieved 19 January 2017.
  108. ^ "Water-starved Tamil Nadu farmers seek to take the fizz out of cola giants". Hindustan Times. 23 December 2016. Retrieved 19 January 2017.
  109. ^ "Chennai's Marina beach turns into Tahrir Square for Jallikattu democracy". The New Indian Express. Archived from the original on 20 January 2017. Retrieved 19 January 2017.
  110. ^ "Jallikattu Fight: Techies join Jallikattu stir, Paneerselvam to meet PM Narendra Modi". The Economic Times. Retrieved 19 January 2017.
  111. ^ "Panel probing violence in jallikattu protests begins inquiry in Salem". The Times of India. 18 November 2017. Retrieved 10 January 2022.
  112. ^ "Thousands gather at MGR Circle demanding jallikattu". The Hindu. Retrieved 24 January 2017.
  113. ^ "Thousands gather at Tamukkam demanding jallikattu". The Hindu. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  114. ^ Revathy, LN (20 January 2017). "Jallikattu protests intensify in Coimbatore". The Hindu Business Line. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  115. ^ "We want jallikattu, ban PETA, say citizens in one voice". The Hindu. 19 January 2017. Retrieved 19 January 2017.
  116. ^ "Protest in Vellore: Gathered at fort, flay Centre, state failure". Times of India. Retrieved 19 January 2017.
  117. ^ "Jallikattu back in Tamil Nadu, claims 2 lives". Deccan Chronicle. 23 January 2017. Retrieved 10 January 2022.
  118. ^ "Karnataka Tamil youth express solidarity with Jallikattu protestors across the border". newindianexpress.com. Archived from the original on 23 January 2017. Retrieved 19 January 2017.
  119. ^ "Group protests ban on jallikattu". indiatimes.com. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  120. ^ "Delhi Tamilians came together to save Tamil tradition". newindianexpress.com. 19 January 2017. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  121. ^ "From London to Madurai and beyond: Tamilians protest against jallikattu ban". The News Minute. 18 January 2017. Retrieved 19 January 2017.
  122. ^ "ஜப்பானையும் தாக்கிய ஜல்லிக்கட்டு சுனாமி: ஆதரவாக கையெழுத்து வேட்டை". maalaimalar.com. 21 January 2017. Retrieved 21 January 2017.
  123. ^ "Jallikattu Protests: Peaceful protests held in Minneapolis, USA". Behindwoods News Shots. 18 January 2017. Retrieved 19 January 2017.
  124. ^ "#MakkalMovement on Jallikattu Goes Global". timesnow.tv. Retrieved 19 January 2017.
  125. ^ #Jallikattu 2017 Protests in Finland. Retrieved 22 January 2017.
  126. ^ "Jallikattu protests: Leaderless on Marina Beach, they kept the leaders away". The Indian Express. 19 January 2017. Retrieved 19 January 2017.
  127. ^ "Protests for jallikattu turn mass pageant of Tamil pride". The Times of India. Retrieved 21 January 2017.
  128. ^ "Detained protestors go on fast for jallikattu as Alanganallur fights on". Archived from the original on 19 January 2017. Retrieved 19 January 2017.
  129. ^ "More than 60 Jersey cows from Switzerland arrive in Chennai". The Times of India. Retrieved 19 January 2017.
  130. ^ "Tamil Nadu imports 540 jersey cows from Switzerland". timesofindia.indiatimes.com. Archived from the original on 20 January 2017.
  131. ^ Jesudasan, Dennis S. "Tamil Nadu to take ordinance route for conducting Jallikattu". The Hindu. Retrieved 23 February 2017.
  132. ^ "Thousands protest in Karnataka against Kambala ban". The Times of India. Retrieved 27 January 2017.
  133. ^ "Now, protest at Visakhapatnam beach for special status for Andhra Pradesh". Retrieved 27 January 2017.
  134. ^ "Special status rallies in Andhra Pradesh damp squib, Y Sujana Chowdary sparks row". The Times of India. Retrieved 27 January 2017.
  135. ^ "Tamil Nadu Traders to Boycott Coke, Pepsi From March". News18. 27 January 2017. Retrieved 27 January 2017.
  136. ^ Babu, Gireesh (26 January 2017). "Tamil Nadu traders body to stop sales of Pepsi, Coke". Business Standard India. Retrieved 27 January 2017.
  137. ^ "Rs 1,400 crore may fizz out of Coca-Cola, PepsiCo coffers as Tamil Nadu traders mulling to ban products". The Economic Times. Retrieved 27 January 2017.
  138. ^ "Republic Day: Attendance Thin For Parade at Chennai's Marina Beach Road". NDTV.com. Retrieved 27 January 2017.
  139. ^ Sivaraman, R. "Poor turnout on Republic Day proves a dampener". The Hindu. Retrieved 27 January 2017.
  140. ^ "Police warns of action against those who illegally congregate in Marina beach". The New Indian Express. Retrieved 28 January 2017.
  141. ^ "Jallikattu Row: Police warns of action against those who illegally congregate in Marina Beach". The Financial Express. 28 January 2017. Retrieved 28 January 2017.