Religious exclusivism: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Tassedethe (talk | contribs) |
||
(12 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Stance that only one spiritual belief is true}} |
{{Short description|Stance that only one spiritual belief is true}} |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
'''Religious exclusivism''', or '''religious exclusivity''', is the doctrine or belief that only one particular [[religion]] or [[belief system]] is true.<ref>{{cite book|title=The Oxford handbook of philosophy of religion|url=https://archive.org/details/oxfordhandbookph00wain_900|url-access=limited|page=[https://archive.org/details/oxfordhandbookph00wain_900/page/n297 345]|first=William J.|last=Wainwright|year=2005|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-513809-2}}</ref> This is in contrast to [[religious pluralism]]. |
'''Religious exclusivism''', or '''religious exclusivity''', is the doctrine or belief that only one particular [[religion]] or [[belief system]] is true.<ref>{{cite book|title=The Oxford handbook of philosophy of religion|url=https://archive.org/details/oxfordhandbookph00wain_900|url-access=limited|page=[https://archive.org/details/oxfordhandbookph00wain_900/page/n297 345]|first=William J.|last=Wainwright|year=2005|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-513809-2}}</ref> This is in contrast to [[religious pluralism]]. |
||
==Buddhism== |
==Buddhism== |
||
Some attempts have been made to portray Buddhism in an exclusivistic framework by pointing out that the implication that those who do not accept the teachings of the Buddha, such as the [[Noble Eightfold Path]], are destined to repeat the cycle of suffering through endless reincarnations; while those who practice the true way can reach enlightenment. Neo-Buddhist groups sometimes consider their tradition the true path to enlightenment and engage in strong evangelical efforts to influence those they consider to be in darkness |
Some attempts have been made to portray [[Buddhism]] in an exclusivistic framework by pointing out that the implication that those who do not accept the teachings of the Buddha, such as the [[Noble Eightfold Path]], are destined to repeat the cycle of suffering through endless reincarnations; while those who practice the true way can reach enlightenment.{{citation needed|date=November 2024}} Neo-Buddhist groups sometimes consider their tradition the true path to enlightenment and engage in strong evangelical efforts to influence those they consider to be in darkness.{{citation needed|date=November 2024}} |
||
However, many followers of [[Eastern religion]]s are not exclusivist. For example, there are millions of |
However, many followers of [[Eastern religion]]s are not exclusivist. For example, there are millions of Buddhists who would also consider themselves to follow [[Confucianism]] or [[Taoism]].<ref>{{citation|url=https://byustudies.byu.edu/showtitle.aspx?title=7154|title=Testing Stark's Thesis:Is Mormonism the First New World Religion since Islam?|first=Gerald R.|last=McDermott|publisher=BYU Studies|year=2005|url-status=dead|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140221174108/https://byustudies.byu.edu/showtitle.aspx?title=7154|archivedate=2014-02-21}}</ref> |
||
Perry Schmidt-Leukel pointed out that the parable about the blind, which tries to describe the elephant in Mevlana Celaleddin-i Rûmi's Mesnevi, but whose original origin is in the Buddhist Pali Canon, is more related to religious exclusivity rather than pluralism in the Buddhist context. In the Buddhist context, the elephant refers to true dharma, the blind refers to those who have views opposing Buddha, the sighted person refers to the king who was Buddha in his previous life, and the clear statement of the text is that blind people cannot enter the path of true salvation, and this is stated in the text as blind people "cannot go beyond Samsara". Only Buddhas show the path to salvation and they will provide the means to cross the Samsara river. The parable ends with a very clear analogy: The light of other teachers is like the light of a firefly, whereas the Buddha's light shines like the sun: "When that illuminator appears, the light of the firefly goes out and shines no more." |
Perry Schmidt-Leukel pointed out that the parable about the blind, which tries to describe the elephant in Mevlana Celaleddin-i Rûmi's Mesnevi, but whose original origin is in the Buddhist Pali Canon, is more related to religious exclusivity rather than pluralism in the Buddhist context. In the Buddhist context, the elephant refers to true dharma, the blind refers to those who have views opposing Buddha, the sighted person refers to the king who was Buddha in his previous life, and the clear statement of the text is that blind people cannot enter the path of true salvation, and this is stated in the text as blind people "cannot go beyond Samsara". Only Buddhas show the path to salvation and they will provide the means to cross the Samsara river. The parable ends with a very clear analogy: The light of other teachers is like the light of a firefly, whereas the Buddha's light shines like the sun: "When that illuminator appears, the light of the firefly goes out and shines no more."<ref>Perry Schmidt-Leukel, Religious Pluralism and Interreligious Dialogue:the Gifford lectures, New York: Orbis Books-an extended edition, 2017, p.73</ref> |
||
==Christianity== |
==Christianity== |
||
{{further|Christianity and other religions}} |
{{further|Christianity and other religions}} |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | Some Christians<ref>[http://www.christians.eu/why-jesus/ Why Jesus?] Article stating that Jesus is the saviour and not Mohammed or Buddha—see second part of this article.</ref> have argued that religious pluralism is an invalid or self-contradictory concept. Maximal forms of religious pluralism claim that all religions are equally true, or that one religion can be true for some and another for others. Most Christians hold this idea to be [[logic]]ally impossible from the [[Principle of contradiction]].<ref>[http://www.christianministriesintl.org/articles/12.html Defending Salvation Through Christ Alone] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091003214003/http://www.christianministriesintl.org/articles/12.html |date=2009-10-03 }} By Jason Carlson, Christian Ministries International</ref> The two largest Christian branches, the [[Catholic Church]] and the [[Eastern Orthodox Church]], both claim to be the "[[one true church]]" and that "[[Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus|outside the true Church there is no salvation]]"; [[Protestantism]], however, which has many different denominations, has no consistent doctrine in this regard, and has a variety of different positions regarding religious pluralism. |
||
⚫ | A number of [[Christian denomination]]s assert that they alone represent the [[one true church]] – the church to which [[Jesus in Christianity|Jesus]] gave his authority in the [[Great Commission]]. The Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church, the [[Oriental Orthodoxy|Oriental Orthodox]] communion and the [[Assyrian Church of the East]] each understands itself as the one and only original church. The claim to the title of the "one true church" relates to the first of the [[Four Marks of the Church]] mentioned in the [[Nicene Creed]]: "one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church". The concept of [[schism]] somewhat moderates the competing claims between some churches – one can potentially repair schism. For example, the Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Churches each regard the other as schismatic rather than [[heresy|heretical]].<ref>At least the Catholic position on the matter is clear, but with the Orthodox one less so. Many Orthodox object to the Catholic doctrines of [[Purgatory]], [[Substitutionary atonement]], the [[Immaculate Conception]], and [[papal supremacy]], among others, as heretical doctrines. See [http://vaticaninsider.lastampa.it/en/world-news/detail/articolo/ortodossi-ortodoxa-orthodox-francesco-francisco-francis-33491/ Vatican Insider], "Two Orthodox bishops accuse the Pope of heresy" 04-15-14</ref> |
||
⚫ | Some Christians<ref>[http://www.christians.eu/why-jesus/ Why Jesus?] Article stating that Jesus is the saviour and not Mohammed or Buddha—see second part of this article.</ref> have argued that religious pluralism is an invalid or self-contradictory concept. Maximal forms of religious pluralism claim that all religions are equally true, or that one religion can be true for some and another for others. Most Christians hold this idea to be [[logic]]ally impossible from the [[Principle of contradiction]].<ref>[http://www.christianministriesintl.org/articles/12.html Defending Salvation Through Christ Alone] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091003214003/http://www.christianministriesintl.org/articles/12.html |date=2009-10-03 }} By Jason Carlson, Christian Ministries International</ref> The two largest Christian branches, the [[Catholic Church]] and the [[Eastern Orthodox Church]], both claim to be the "[[one true church]]" and that "[[Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus|outside the true Church there is no salvation]]"; Protestantism however, which has many different denominations, has no consistent doctrine in this regard, and has a variety of different positions regarding religious pluralism. |
||
⚫ | Many mainstream Protestants regard all [[baptism|baptized]] Christians as members of a "spiritual [[Christian Church]]", which is not visible or institutional; this belief is sometimes referred to by the theological term "[[invisible church]]". Some other Christians, such as [[Anglican]]s of [[Anglo-Catholic]] churchmanship, espouse a version of [[branch theory]] which teaches that the true Christian Church comprises Anglican, Eastern Orthodox, [[Old Catholic Church|Old Catholic]], Oriental Orthodox, Scandinavian [[Lutheran]], and Roman Catholic branches.<ref name="Knight2016"> |
||
⚫ | A number of [[Christian denomination]]s assert that they alone represent the [[one true church]] – the church to which [[Jesus in Christianity|Jesus]] gave his authority in the [[Great Commission]]. The |
||
⚫ | Many mainstream |
||
{{cite book |
{{cite book |
||
|last= Knight|first= Frances |
|last= Knight|first= Frances |
||
Line 37: | Line 35: | ||
— Bhagavad Gita, 18:22</blockquote> |
— Bhagavad Gita, 18:22</blockquote> |
||
Although Hindu sages such as [[Ramakrishna| |
Although Hindu sages such as [[Ramakrishna|Sri Ramakrishna Paramhansa]] and [[Ramana Maharshi|Sri Ramana Maharshi]] have the approach that all religions contain the truth and lead to the same ultimate goal, some Hindus have stated that this universalism is contrary to Hinduism.<ref>Frank Morales, Neo-Vedanta: The problem with Hindu universalism – [https://bharatabharati.in/2012/02/15/neo-vedanta-the-problem-with-hindu-universalism-frank-gaetano-morales/ Neo-Vedanta: The problem with Hindu universalism]</ref> |
||
==Islam== |
==Islam== |
||
{{Further|Islam and other religions|Divisions of the world in Islam|Islamism}} |
{{Further|Islam and other religions|Divisions of the world in Islam|Islamism}} |
||
[[Muslim]]s believe that [[Allah]] revealed the [[Qur'an]] to Muhammad. Other Islamic books considered to be revealed by God before the Quran, mentioned by name in the Quran are the [[Tawrat]] ([[Torah]], |
[[Muslim]]s believe that [[Allah]] revealed the [[Qur'an]] to Muhammad. Other Islamic books considered to be revealed by God before the Quran, mentioned by name in the Quran are the [[Tawrat]] ([[Torah]], {{Langx|he|תּוֹרָה}}) revealed to the [[Prophets and messengers in Islam|prophets and messengers]] amongst the [[Children of Israel]], the [[Zabur]] ([[Psalms]]) revealed to [[David in Islam|Dawud]] ([[David]]) and the [[Injil]] (the [[Gospel]]) revealed to [[Jesus in Islam|Isa]] ([[Jesus]]). The Quran also mentions God having revealed the [[Scrolls of Abraham]] and the [[Scrolls of Moses]]. Most Muslims, however, maintain that [[Prophets in Islam|previous messages and revelations]] have been [[Tahrif|partially changed or corrupted]] over time<ref name="Distorted">Accad (2003): According to Ibn Taymiya, although only some Muslims accept the textual veracity of the entire Bible, most Muslims will grant the veracity of most of it.</ref> and consider the Quran to be the unaltered and the [[Khatam an-Nabiyyin|final revelation]] from Allah. Religious concepts and practices include the [[Five Pillars of Islam|five pillars of Islam]], which are basic concepts and obligatory acts of worship, and following [[Sharia|Islamic law]], which touches on virtually every aspect of life and society, encompassing everything from [[Islamic banking|banking]] and [[zakāt|welfare]], to [[Islamic military jurisprudence|warfare]] and the environment.<ref>Esposito (2002b), p.17</ref><ref>Esposito (2002b), pp.111, 112, 118</ref><ref>{{cite encyclopedia | title=Shari'ah | encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica Online }}</ref> |
||
Islam began its history with an exclusivist attitude toward [[polytheist]] religions, but an inclusivist attitude toward monotheists, including Christians and Jews. Believers in the oneness of God were given the status of ''[[dhimmi]]'', conferring on them certain rights, including the right to practice their religions openly and not to be pressured to accept Islam.{{citation needed|date=October 2023}} |
Islam began its history with an exclusivist attitude toward [[polytheist]] religions, but an inclusivist attitude toward monotheists, including Christians and Jews. Believers in the oneness of God were given the status of ''[[dhimmi]]'', conferring on them certain rights, including the right to practice their religions openly and not to be pressured to accept Islam.{{citation needed|date=October 2023}} |
||
In practice, however, neither the inclusion of Jews and Christians nor militant exclusivism toward "pagans" was always practiced. Trinitarian Christians were accused of [[idolatry]] because of their veneration of [[icon]]s and were also sometimes treated as polytheists because of the doctrines of the [[Trinity]] and the [[Incarnation]].<ref>{{cite book|first1=John |last1=Corrigan|first2=Frederick |last2=Denny|first3=Martin S |last3=Jaffee|first4=Carlos |last4=Eire|title=Jews, Christians, Muslims: A Comparative Introduction to Monotheistic Religions|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vaZYCwAAQBAJ|year=2016|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-317-34699-9|page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vaZYCwAAQBAJ&pg=PT159&dq=qur%27an+%22rejected+the+christian+trinity%22+%22absolute+oneness+of+god%22 159]|chapter=Monotheism in Islam}}</ref> |
In practice, however, neither the inclusion of Jews and Christians nor militant exclusivism toward "pagans" was always practiced. Trinitarian Christians were accused of [[idolatry]] because of their veneration of [[icon]]s and were also sometimes treated as polytheists because of the doctrines of the [[Trinity]] and the [[Incarnation]].<ref>{{cite book|first1=John |last1=Corrigan|first2=Frederick |last2=Denny|first3=Martin S |last3=Jaffee|first4=Carlos |last4=Eire|title=Jews, Christians, Muslims: A Comparative Introduction to Monotheistic Religions|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vaZYCwAAQBAJ|year=2016|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-317-34699-9|page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vaZYCwAAQBAJ&pg=PT159&dq=qur%27an+%22rejected+the+christian+trinity%22+%22absolute+oneness+of+god%22 159]|chapter=Monotheism in Islam}}</ref> Islam sees sincere [[Jew]]s, [[Christians]], and [[Sabians]] as [[People of the Book|people "of the Book"]].{{citation needed|date=October 2023}} |
||
The basic attitude of Muslims toward other religions are varied today, and certain Islamic nations, such as [[Saudi Arabia]] and [[Iran]], are more exclusivistic toward other religions than are others, such as [[Indonesia]] and [[Egypt]].{{citation needed|date=October 2023}} |
The basic attitude of Muslims toward other religions are varied today, and certain Islamic nations, such as [[Saudi Arabia]] and [[Iran]], are more exclusivistic toward other religions than are others, such as [[Indonesia]] and [[Egypt]].{{citation needed|date=October 2023}} |
||
Islam does accept sincere [[Jew]]s, [[Christians]], and [[Sabians]] as [[People of the Book|people "of the Book"]] along with [[Muslim]]s.{{citation needed|date=October 2023}} |
|||
The hadith attributed to the prophet Muhammad and known as the hadith of 73 sects states that there will be 73 different sects and groups within Islam and that only one of these groups will reach salvation or heaven, while the others will be destined for hell. Two separate narrations of the hadith are as follows: |
The hadith attributed to the prophet Muhammad and known as the hadith of 73 sects states that there will be 73 different sects and groups within Islam and that only one of these groups will reach salvation or heaven, while the others will be destined for hell. Two separate narrations of the hadith are as follows: |
||
“The Jews split into seventy-one sects, one of which will be in Paradise and seventy in Hell. The Christians split into seventy-two sects, seventy-one of which will be in Hell and one in Paradise. I swear by the One Whose Hand is the soul of Muhammad, my nation will split into seventy-three sects, one of which will be in Paradise and seventy-two in Hell.” It was said: “O Messenger of Allah, who are they?” He said: “The main body.” (Sunan Ibn Majah 3992, Book 36, Hadith 67)<ref>[https://sunnah.com/ibnmajah:3992 (Hadith/Tradition of Prophet) Tribulations:The division of nations] |
“The Jews split into seventy-one sects, one of which will be in Paradise and seventy in Hell. The Christians split into seventy-two sects, seventy-one of which will be in Hell and one in Paradise. I swear by the One Whose Hand is the soul of Muhammad, my nation will split into seventy-three sects, one of which will be in Paradise and seventy-two in Hell.” It was said: “O Messenger of Allah, who are they?” He said: “The main body.” (Sunan Ibn Majah 3992, Book 36, Hadith 67)<ref>[https://sunnah.com/ibnmajah:3992 (Hadith/Tradition of Prophet) Tribulations:The division of nations]</ref> |
||
Another version of Hadith: |
Another version of Hadith: |
||
"Narrated 'Abdullah bin 'Amr: |
"Narrated 'Abdullah bin 'Amr: |
||
that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: "What befell the children of Isra'il will befall my Ummah, step by step, such that if there was one who had intercourse with his mother in the open, then there would be someone from my Ummah who would do that. Indeed the children of Isra'il split into seventy-two sects, and my Ummah will split into seventy-three sects. All of them are in the Fire Except one sect." He said: "And which is it O Messenger of Allah?" He said: "What I am upon and my Companions." " (Jami` at-Tirmidhi 2641, Book 40, Hadith 36) |
that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: "What befell the children of Isra'il will befall my Ummah, step by step, such that if there was one who had intercourse with his mother in the open, then there would be someone from my Ummah who would do that. Indeed the children of Isra'il split into seventy-two sects, and my Ummah will split into seventy-three sects. All of them are in the Fire Except one sect." He said: "And which is it O Messenger of Allah?" He said: "What I am upon and my Companions." " (Jami` at-Tirmidhi 2641, Book 40, Hadith 36)<ref>[https://sunnah.com/tirmidhi:2641 (Hadith/Tradition of Prophet) The Book on Faith: What Has Been Related About The Splitting That Will Occur In This Ummah]</ref> |
||
Scholars of major Islamic sects have commented that the sect that achieved salvation in this hadith is the sect to which they belong. For example, Abū l-Ḥusayn al-Malaṭī, ‘Abd al-Qāhir |
Scholars of major Islamic sects have commented that the sect that achieved salvation in this hadith is the sect to which they belong. For example, Abū l-Ḥusayn al-Malaṭī, ‘Abd al-Qāhir |
||
Sunni scholars such as al-Baghdādī, Abū l-Muzaffar al-Isfarā'inī, al-Shahrastānī, [[Sunni Islam|Sunnis]] were the saved sect, according to an Ismā'īlī scholar such as Abū Tammām al-Khawārizmī, [[Isma'ilism|Ismailis]], according to important Mu'tazili scholar Qāḍī 'Abd al-Jabbār the sect that achieved salvation was the [[Mu'tazilism| |
Sunni scholars such as al-Baghdādī, Abū l-Muzaffar al-Isfarā'inī, al-Shahrastānī, [[Sunni Islam|Sunnis]] were the saved sect, according to an Ismā'īlī scholar such as Abū Tammām al-Khawārizmī, [[Isma'ilism|Ismailis]], according to important Mu'tazili scholar Qāḍī 'Abd al-Jabbār the sect that achieved salvation was the [[Mu'tazilism|Mu'tazilites]].<ref>Kadir Gömbeyaz, The Influence of the 73 Sects Ḥadīth on the Classification of Theological Sects in Islamic Heresiographical Literature, ULUM:Journal of Religious Inquiries, 1/2 (December 2018), p.251</ref> |
||
==Judaism== |
==Judaism== |
||
Line 68: | Line 64: | ||
* [[One true church]] |
* [[One true church]] |
||
* [[Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus]] |
* [[Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus]] |
||
* [[Far-right politics]] |
|||
* [[Spanish Inquisition]] |
* [[Spanish Inquisition]] |
||
* [[Mleccha]] |
* [[Mleccha]] |
||
* [[Dalit]] |
* [[Dalit]] |
||
* [[73 Sects (Hadith)]] |
* [[73 Sects (Hadith)]] |
||
* [[Sectarian violence]] |
|||
* [[Supremacism#Religious]] |
|||
* [[Religious discrimination]] |
|||
* [[Religious intolerance]] |
|||
* [[Theocracy]] |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
||
Line 77: | Line 79: | ||
==Further reading== |
==Further reading== |
||
* [[Peter Corney|Corney, Peter]], and Kevin Giles. ''Exclusivism and the Gospel''. Kew, Vic: St. Hilary's Anglican Church, 1997. OCLC 38819137 |
* [[Peter Corney (pastor)|Corney, Peter]], and Kevin Giles. ''Exclusivism and the Gospel''. Kew, Vic: St. Hilary's Anglican Church, 1997. OCLC 38819137 |
||
* [[Kwesi Dickson|Dickson, Kwesi A.]] ''Uncompleted Mission: Christianity and Exclusivism''. Orbis Books, 1991. {{ISBN|978-0-88344-751-2}} |
* [[Kwesi Dickson|Dickson, Kwesi A.]] ''Uncompleted Mission: Christianity and Exclusivism''. Orbis Books, 1991. {{ISBN|978-0-88344-751-2}} |
||
* [[Paul J. Griffiths|Griffiths, Paul]]. ''Problems of Religious Diversity. Exploring the Philosophy of Religion''. Blackwell Publishers, 2001. {{ISBN|0-631-21150-0}} |
* [[Paul J. Griffiths|Griffiths, Paul]]. ''Problems of Religious Diversity. Exploring the Philosophy of Religion''. Blackwell Publishers, 2001. {{ISBN|0-631-21150-0}} |
||
Line 87: | Line 89: | ||
* Perry Schmidt-Leukel and Joachim Gentz (Eds.), Religious Diversity in Chinese Thought, Macmillan:Palgrave, 2013. |
* Perry Schmidt-Leukel and Joachim Gentz (Eds.), Religious Diversity in Chinese Thought, Macmillan:Palgrave, 2013. |
||
* Perry Schmidt-Leukel, Hans-Peter Grosshans and Madlen Krueger (Eds.), Ethnic and Religious Diversity in Myanmar, London-New York; Bloomsbury Academic, 2022. |
* Perry Schmidt-Leukel, Hans-Peter Grosshans and Madlen Krueger (Eds.), Ethnic and Religious Diversity in Myanmar, London-New York; Bloomsbury Academic, 2022. |
||
* Kadir Gömbeyaz, The Influence of the 73 Sects Ḥadīth on the Classification of Theological Sects in Islamic Heresiographical Literature, ULUM:Journal of Religious Inquiries, 1/2 (December 2018), pp. |
* Kadir Gömbeyaz, The Influence of the 73 Sects Ḥadīth on the Classification of Theological Sects in Islamic Heresiographical Literature, ULUM:Journal of Religious Inquiries, 1/2 (December 2018), pp. 245–258 [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3354414 doi number and link] |
||
{{Religious persecution}} |
|||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Religion and society]] |
||
[[Category:Religious discrimination]] |
|||
[[Category:Religious persecution]] |
|||
[[Category:Religious studies]] |
[[Category:Religious studies]] |
Latest revision as of 16:53, 17 November 2024
Part of a series on |
Discrimination |
---|
Religious exclusivism, or religious exclusivity, is the doctrine or belief that only one particular religion or belief system is true.[1] This is in contrast to religious pluralism.
Buddhism
[edit]Some attempts have been made to portray Buddhism in an exclusivistic framework by pointing out that the implication that those who do not accept the teachings of the Buddha, such as the Noble Eightfold Path, are destined to repeat the cycle of suffering through endless reincarnations; while those who practice the true way can reach enlightenment.[citation needed] Neo-Buddhist groups sometimes consider their tradition the true path to enlightenment and engage in strong evangelical efforts to influence those they consider to be in darkness.[citation needed]
However, many followers of Eastern religions are not exclusivist. For example, there are millions of Buddhists who would also consider themselves to follow Confucianism or Taoism.[2]
Perry Schmidt-Leukel pointed out that the parable about the blind, which tries to describe the elephant in Mevlana Celaleddin-i Rûmi's Mesnevi, but whose original origin is in the Buddhist Pali Canon, is more related to religious exclusivity rather than pluralism in the Buddhist context. In the Buddhist context, the elephant refers to true dharma, the blind refers to those who have views opposing Buddha, the sighted person refers to the king who was Buddha in his previous life, and the clear statement of the text is that blind people cannot enter the path of true salvation, and this is stated in the text as blind people "cannot go beyond Samsara". Only Buddhas show the path to salvation and they will provide the means to cross the Samsara river. The parable ends with a very clear analogy: The light of other teachers is like the light of a firefly, whereas the Buddha's light shines like the sun: "When that illuminator appears, the light of the firefly goes out and shines no more."[3]
Christianity
[edit]Some Christians[4] have argued that religious pluralism is an invalid or self-contradictory concept. Maximal forms of religious pluralism claim that all religions are equally true, or that one religion can be true for some and another for others. Most Christians hold this idea to be logically impossible from the Principle of contradiction.[5] The two largest Christian branches, the Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church, both claim to be the "one true church" and that "outside the true Church there is no salvation"; Protestantism, however, which has many different denominations, has no consistent doctrine in this regard, and has a variety of different positions regarding religious pluralism.
A number of Christian denominations assert that they alone represent the one true church – the church to which Jesus gave his authority in the Great Commission. The Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church, the Oriental Orthodox communion and the Assyrian Church of the East each understands itself as the one and only original church. The claim to the title of the "one true church" relates to the first of the Four Marks of the Church mentioned in the Nicene Creed: "one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church". The concept of schism somewhat moderates the competing claims between some churches – one can potentially repair schism. For example, the Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Churches each regard the other as schismatic rather than heretical.[6]
Many mainstream Protestants regard all baptized Christians as members of a "spiritual Christian Church", which is not visible or institutional; this belief is sometimes referred to by the theological term "invisible church". Some other Christians, such as Anglicans of Anglo-Catholic churchmanship, espouse a version of branch theory which teaches that the true Christian Church comprises Anglican, Eastern Orthodox, Old Catholic, Oriental Orthodox, Scandinavian Lutheran, and Roman Catholic branches.[7]
Hinduism
[edit]The Bhagavad Gita warns against exclusivism:
यत्तु कृत्स्नवदेकस्मिन्कार्ये सक्तमहैतुकम्।
अतत्त्वार्थवदल्पं च तत्तामसमुदाहृतम्
But that which clings blindly to one idea as if it were all, without logic, truth or insight, that has its origin in Darkness.
— Bhagavad Gita, 18:22
Although Hindu sages such as Sri Ramakrishna Paramhansa and Sri Ramana Maharshi have the approach that all religions contain the truth and lead to the same ultimate goal, some Hindus have stated that this universalism is contrary to Hinduism.[8]
Islam
[edit]Muslims believe that Allah revealed the Qur'an to Muhammad. Other Islamic books considered to be revealed by God before the Quran, mentioned by name in the Quran are the Tawrat (Torah, Hebrew: תּוֹרָה) revealed to the prophets and messengers amongst the Children of Israel, the Zabur (Psalms) revealed to Dawud (David) and the Injil (the Gospel) revealed to Isa (Jesus). The Quran also mentions God having revealed the Scrolls of Abraham and the Scrolls of Moses. Most Muslims, however, maintain that previous messages and revelations have been partially changed or corrupted over time[9] and consider the Quran to be the unaltered and the final revelation from Allah. Religious concepts and practices include the five pillars of Islam, which are basic concepts and obligatory acts of worship, and following Islamic law, which touches on virtually every aspect of life and society, encompassing everything from banking and welfare, to warfare and the environment.[10][11][12]
Islam began its history with an exclusivist attitude toward polytheist religions, but an inclusivist attitude toward monotheists, including Christians and Jews. Believers in the oneness of God were given the status of dhimmi, conferring on them certain rights, including the right to practice their religions openly and not to be pressured to accept Islam.[citation needed]
In practice, however, neither the inclusion of Jews and Christians nor militant exclusivism toward "pagans" was always practiced. Trinitarian Christians were accused of idolatry because of their veneration of icons and were also sometimes treated as polytheists because of the doctrines of the Trinity and the Incarnation.[13] Islam sees sincere Jews, Christians, and Sabians as people "of the Book".[citation needed]
The basic attitude of Muslims toward other religions are varied today, and certain Islamic nations, such as Saudi Arabia and Iran, are more exclusivistic toward other religions than are others, such as Indonesia and Egypt.[citation needed]
The hadith attributed to the prophet Muhammad and known as the hadith of 73 sects states that there will be 73 different sects and groups within Islam and that only one of these groups will reach salvation or heaven, while the others will be destined for hell. Two separate narrations of the hadith are as follows:
“The Jews split into seventy-one sects, one of which will be in Paradise and seventy in Hell. The Christians split into seventy-two sects, seventy-one of which will be in Hell and one in Paradise. I swear by the One Whose Hand is the soul of Muhammad, my nation will split into seventy-three sects, one of which will be in Paradise and seventy-two in Hell.” It was said: “O Messenger of Allah, who are they?” He said: “The main body.” (Sunan Ibn Majah 3992, Book 36, Hadith 67)[14]
Another version of Hadith: "Narrated 'Abdullah bin 'Amr: that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: "What befell the children of Isra'il will befall my Ummah, step by step, such that if there was one who had intercourse with his mother in the open, then there would be someone from my Ummah who would do that. Indeed the children of Isra'il split into seventy-two sects, and my Ummah will split into seventy-three sects. All of them are in the Fire Except one sect." He said: "And which is it O Messenger of Allah?" He said: "What I am upon and my Companions." " (Jami` at-Tirmidhi 2641, Book 40, Hadith 36)[15]
Scholars of major Islamic sects have commented that the sect that achieved salvation in this hadith is the sect to which they belong. For example, Abū l-Ḥusayn al-Malaṭī, ‘Abd al-Qāhir Sunni scholars such as al-Baghdādī, Abū l-Muzaffar al-Isfarā'inī, al-Shahrastānī, Sunnis were the saved sect, according to an Ismā'īlī scholar such as Abū Tammām al-Khawārizmī, Ismailis, according to important Mu'tazili scholar Qāḍī 'Abd al-Jabbār the sect that achieved salvation was the Mu'tazilites.[16]
Judaism
[edit]Most Jews believe that the God of Abraham is the one true God. The Jews believe the God of Abraham entered into a covenant with the ancient Israelites, marking them as his Chosen People, giving them a mission to spread the concept of monotheism. Jews do not consider their chosenness to be a mark of superiority to other nations, but a responsibility to be an example of behavior for other nations to emulate.[17]
See also
[edit]- One true church
- Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus
- Far-right politics
- Spanish Inquisition
- Mleccha
- Dalit
- 73 Sects (Hadith)
- Sectarian violence
- Supremacism#Religious
- Religious discrimination
- Religious intolerance
- Theocracy
References
[edit]- ^ Wainwright, William J. (2005). The Oxford handbook of philosophy of religion. Oxford University Press. p. 345. ISBN 978-0-19-513809-2.
- ^ McDermott, Gerald R. (2005), Testing Stark's Thesis:Is Mormonism the First New World Religion since Islam?, BYU Studies, archived from the original on 2014-02-21
- ^ Perry Schmidt-Leukel, Religious Pluralism and Interreligious Dialogue:the Gifford lectures, New York: Orbis Books-an extended edition, 2017, p.73
- ^ Why Jesus? Article stating that Jesus is the saviour and not Mohammed or Buddha—see second part of this article.
- ^ Defending Salvation Through Christ Alone Archived 2009-10-03 at the Wayback Machine By Jason Carlson, Christian Ministries International
- ^ At least the Catholic position on the matter is clear, but with the Orthodox one less so. Many Orthodox object to the Catholic doctrines of Purgatory, Substitutionary atonement, the Immaculate Conception, and papal supremacy, among others, as heretical doctrines. See Vatican Insider, "Two Orthodox bishops accuse the Pope of heresy" 04-15-14
- ^ Knight, Frances (8 April 2016). Religion, Identity and Conflict in Britain. Routledge. p. 143. ISBN 9781317067238.
- ^ Frank Morales, Neo-Vedanta: The problem with Hindu universalism – Neo-Vedanta: The problem with Hindu universalism
- ^ Accad (2003): According to Ibn Taymiya, although only some Muslims accept the textual veracity of the entire Bible, most Muslims will grant the veracity of most of it.
- ^ Esposito (2002b), p.17
- ^ Esposito (2002b), pp.111, 112, 118
- ^ "Shari'ah". Encyclopædia Britannica Online.
- ^ Corrigan, John; Denny, Frederick; Jaffee, Martin S; Eire, Carlos (2016). "Monotheism in Islam". Jews, Christians, Muslims: A Comparative Introduction to Monotheistic Religions. Routledge. p. 159. ISBN 978-1-317-34699-9.
- ^ (Hadith/Tradition of Prophet) Tribulations:The division of nations
- ^ (Hadith/Tradition of Prophet) The Book on Faith: What Has Been Related About The Splitting That Will Occur In This Ummah
- ^ Kadir Gömbeyaz, The Influence of the 73 Sects Ḥadīth on the Classification of Theological Sects in Islamic Heresiographical Literature, ULUM:Journal of Religious Inquiries, 1/2 (December 2018), p.251
- ^ ""What Does It Mean For Jews to Be the Chosen People?" Pelaia, Ariela". Archived from the original on 2017-02-22. Retrieved 2015-02-17.
Further reading
[edit]- Corney, Peter, and Kevin Giles. Exclusivism and the Gospel. Kew, Vic: St. Hilary's Anglican Church, 1997. OCLC 38819137
- Dickson, Kwesi A. Uncompleted Mission: Christianity and Exclusivism. Orbis Books, 1991. ISBN 978-0-88344-751-2
- Griffiths, Paul. Problems of Religious Diversity. Exploring the Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell Publishers, 2001. ISBN 0-631-21150-0
- Küng, Hans. Christianity and the World Religions: Paths of Dialogue with Islam, Hinduism, and Buddhism. Doubleday, 1986. ISBN 978-0-385-19471-6
- Quinn, Philip, and Kevin Meeker. The Philosophical Challenge of Religious Diversity. Oxford University Press, 1999. ISBN 978-0-19-512155-1
- Frank Morales - Neo-Vedanta: The problem with Hindu universalism
- Perry Schmidt-Leukel, Religious Pluralism and Interreligious Dialogue:the Gifford lectures, New York: Orbis Books-an extended edition, 2017.
- Perry Schmidt-Leukel, Buddha Mind-Christ Mind: A Christian Commentary on the Bodhicaryavatara, Leuven-Paris-Bristol: Peeters, 2019.
- Perry Schmidt-Leukel and Joachim Gentz (Eds.), Religious Diversity in Chinese Thought, Macmillan:Palgrave, 2013.
- Perry Schmidt-Leukel, Hans-Peter Grosshans and Madlen Krueger (Eds.), Ethnic and Religious Diversity in Myanmar, London-New York; Bloomsbury Academic, 2022.
- Kadir Gömbeyaz, The Influence of the 73 Sects Ḥadīth on the Classification of Theological Sects in Islamic Heresiographical Literature, ULUM:Journal of Religious Inquiries, 1/2 (December 2018), pp. 245–258 doi number and link