Gun Control Act of 1968: Difference between revisions
m Rollback edit(s) by 75.87.47.34 (talk): non-constructive (RW 16.1) |
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Altered place. Add: jstor, doi, encyclopedia. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Jay8g | Category:CS1 errors: invisible characters | #UCB_Category 34/39 |
||
(24 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| introducedin= House |
| introducedin= House |
||
| introducedbill= {{USBill|90|H.R.|17735}} |
| introducedbill= {{USBill|90|H.R.|17735}} |
||
| introducedby= [[Emanuel Celler]] ([[Democratic Party (United States)|D]]–[[New York (state)|NY]]) |
|||
| introducedby= |
|||
| introduceddate= |
| introduceddate= June 10, 1968 |
||
| committees= [[United States House Committee on the Judiciary|House Judiciary]] |
|||
| committees= |
|||
| passedbody1= House |
| passedbody1= House |
||
| passeddate1= July 24, 1968 |
| passeddate1= July 24, 1968 |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| amendments=*[[Firearm Owners Protection Act]] |
| amendments=*[[Firearm Owners Protection Act]] |
||
*[[Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act]] |
*[[Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act]] |
||
*[[Violence Against Women Act]] |
|||
*[[Lautenberg Amendment]] |
*[[Lautenberg Amendment]] |
||
| SCOTUS cases = {{Collapsible list|framestyle=line-height:1em|''[[United States v. Bass (1971)|United States v. Bass]]'', {{ussc|404|336|1971}}|''[[Printz v. United States]]'', {{ussc|521|898|1997}}|''[[Small v. United States]]'', {{ussc|544|385|2005}}|''[[United States v. Hayes]]'', {{ussc|555|415|2009}}|''[[Abramski v. United States]]'', {{ussc|573|169|2014}}|''[[Voisine v. United States]]'', {{ussc|docket=14-10154|volume=579|year=2016}}|''[[Rehaif v. United States]]'', {{ussc|docket=17-9560|volume=588|year=2019}}|''[[Greer v. United States]]'', {{ussc|docket=19-8709|volume=593|year=2021}}}} |
| SCOTUS cases = {{Collapsible list|framestyle=line-height:1em|''[[United States v. Bass (1971)|United States v. Bass]]'', {{ussc|404|336|1971}}|''[[Printz v. United States]]'', {{ussc|521|898|1997}}|''[[Small v. United States]]'', {{ussc|544|385|2005}}|''[[United States v. Hayes]]'', {{ussc|555|415|2009}}|''[[Abramski v. United States]]'', {{ussc|573|169|2014}}|''[[Voisine v. United States]]'', {{ussc|docket=14-10154|volume=579|year=2016}}|''[[Rehaif v. United States]]'', {{ussc|docket=17-9560|volume=588|year=2019}}|''[[Greer v. United States]]'', {{ussc|docket=19-8709|volume=593|year=2021}}}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{USgunlegalbox}} |
{{USgunlegalbox}} |
||
The '''Gun Control Act of 1968''' ('''GCA''' or '''GCA68''') is a [[Law of the United States|U.S. federal law]] that regulates the [[firearm]]s industry and firearms ownership. Due to constitutional limitations, the Act is primarily based on regulating [[interstate commerce]] in firearms by generally prohibiting interstate firearms transfers except by manufacturers, dealers and importers licensed under a scheme set up under the Act. |
The '''Gun Control Act of 1968''' ('''GCA''' or '''GCA68''')<ref>{{Citation |title=Gun Control Act of 1968 |date=2013 |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of the Fourth Amendment |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452234243.n342 |access-date=2024-11-17 |place=2300 N Street, NW, Suite 800, Washington DC 20037 United States |publisher=CQ Press |doi=10.4135/9781452234243.n342 |isbn=978-1-60426-589-7}}</ref> is a [[Law of the United States|U.S. federal law]] that regulates the [[firearm]]s industry and firearms ownership. Due to constitutional limitations, the Act is primarily based on regulating [[interstate commerce]] in firearms by generally prohibiting interstate firearms transfers except by manufacturers, dealers and importers licensed under a scheme set up under the Act. |
||
The GCA was |
The GCA was signed into law by President [[Lyndon B. Johnson]] on October 22, 1968, and is Title I of the U.S. federal firearms laws. The [[National Firearms Act]] of 1934 (NFA) is Title II. Both GCA and NFA are enforced by the [[Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives]] (ATF). |
||
GCA repealed the [[Federal Firearms Act of 1938]], though many of its provisions were reenacted as part of the GCA, which revised the FFA and its predecessor, the National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA).<ref name=KeyActsLCPGV>{{cite web |url=http://smartgunlaws.org/key-federal-acts-regulating-guns/ |title=Key Congressional Acts Related to Firearms |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |date=May 21, 2012 |website=smartgunlaws.org |publisher=Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence |access-date=July 6, 2014 }}</ref> |
18 USC {{Usc-title-chap|18|44|pipe=chapter 44}} was first enacted by the [[Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968]]. GCA repealed the [[Federal Firearms Act of 1938]], though many of its provisions were reenacted as part of the GCA, which revised the FFA and its predecessor, the National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA).<ref name=KeyActsLCPGV>{{cite web |url=http://smartgunlaws.org/key-federal-acts-regulating-guns/ |title=Key Congressional Acts Related to Firearms |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |date=May 21, 2012 |website=smartgunlaws.org |publisher=Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence |access-date=July 6, 2014 }}</ref> |
||
==History== |
==History== |
||
The bill was initially prompted by the [[Assassination of John F. Kennedy|assassination of U.S. President John F. Kennedy]] in 1963.<ref name=Michaud120419>{{cite magazine |last=Michaud |first=Jon |date=April 19, 2012 |title=The Birth of the Modern Gun Debate |url=http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/backissues/2012/04/the-birth-of-the-modern-gun-debate.html |magazine=The New Yorker}}</ref> The President was shot and killed with a rifle purchased by mail order from an ad in the magazine ''[[American Rifleman]]''.<ref name=Bugliosi2007>{{cite book |last=Bugliosi |first=Vincent |year=2007 |title=Reclaiming History: The Assassination of John F. Kennedy |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7jrKTKDhvfkC&pg=PA200|publisher=W.W. Norton & Co. |page=200 |isbn=978-0-393-04525-3}}</ref> Congressional hearings followed and a ban on mail-order gun sales was discussed, but no law was passed until 1968. At the hearings NRA Executive Vice-President [[Franklin Orth]] supported a ban on mail-order sales, stating, "We do not think that any sane American, who calls himself an American, can object to placing into this bill the instrument which killed the president of the United States."<ref name=Rosenfeld>{{cite news |last=Rosenfeld |first=Steven |date=January 14, 2013 |title=The NRA once supported gun control |url=http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/the_nra_once_supported_gun_control/ |newspaper=Salon|publisher=Salon Media Group |access-date=July 7, 2014 }}</ref><ref name=UnderFire>{{cite book |last=Davidson |first=Osha Gray |year=1998 |title=Under Fire: The NRA and the Battle for Gun Control |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=X1LEQd2r1sYC&pg=PA30|publisher=University of Iowa Press |page=30 |isbn=978-1-58729-042-8}}</ref> |
The bill was initially prompted by the [[Assassination of John F. Kennedy|assassination of U.S. President John F. Kennedy]] in 1963.<ref name=Michaud120419>{{cite magazine |last=Michaud |first=Jon |date=April 19, 2012 |title=The Birth of the Modern Gun Debate |url=http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/backissues/2012/04/the-birth-of-the-modern-gun-debate.html |magazine=The New Yorker}}</ref> The President was shot and killed with a rifle purchased by mail order from an ad in the magazine ''[[American Rifleman]]''.<ref name=Bugliosi2007>{{cite book |last=Bugliosi |first=Vincent |year=2007 |title=Reclaiming History: The Assassination of John F. Kennedy |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7jrKTKDhvfkC&pg=PA200|publisher=W.W. Norton & Co. |page=200 |isbn=978-0-393-04525-3}}</ref> Congressional hearings followed and a ban on mail-order gun sales was discussed, but no law was passed until 1968. At the hearings NRA Executive Vice-President [[Franklin Orth]] supported a ban on mail-order sales, stating, "We do not think that any sane American, who calls himself an American, can object to placing into this bill the instrument which killed the president of the United States."<ref name=Rosenfeld>{{cite news |last=Rosenfeld |first=Steven |date=January 14, 2013 |title=The NRA once supported gun control |url=http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/the_nra_once_supported_gun_control/ |newspaper=Salon|publisher=Salon Media Group |access-date=July 7, 2014 }}</ref><ref name=UnderFire>{{cite book |last=Davidson |first=Osha Gray |year=1998 |title=Under Fire: The NRA and the Battle for Gun Control |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=X1LEQd2r1sYC&pg=PA30|publisher=University of Iowa Press |page=30 |isbn=978-1-58729-042-8}}</ref> |
||
Precursors of the passage of the Gun Control Act were Senate Bill 1975 in 1963, "A Bill to Regulate the Interstate Shipment of Firearms", and Senate Bill 1592 in 1965, "A Bill to Amend the Federal Firearms Act of 1938". Both were introduced by Senator [[Thomas J. Dodd]] |
Precursors of the passage of the Gun Control Act were Senate Bill 1975<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Vizzard |first1=William J. |title=The Gun Control Act of 1968 |journal=Saint Louis University Public Law Review |date=1999 |volume=18 |url=https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1444&context=plr |access-date=6 October 2024}}</ref> in 1963, "A Bill to Regulate the Interstate Shipment of Firearms", and Senate Bill 1592 in 1965, "A Bill to Amend the Federal Firearms Act of 1938". Both were introduced by Senator [[Thomas J. Dodd]] but in both cases the bill was met with fierce opposition, effectively shutting down the earliest efforts for gun control legislation regarding the mail-order rifles. The bill was once again introduced into the [[United States House of Representatives|House of Representatives]] by the [[United States House Committee on the Judiciary|House Judiciary Committee]] on January 10, 1967<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Pal |first=Anupama |date=2014-09-09 |title=Legal research on ProQuest databases: a survey of Legislative Insight and Congressional |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/rr-12-2013-0314 |journal=Reference Reviews |volume=28 |issue=7 |pages=8–10 |doi=10.1108/rr-12-2013-0314 |issn=0950-4125}}</ref>, with this instance resulting in the bill staying on the legislative docket.<ref>{{cite web |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |year=2014 |title=Sources for Connecticut's role in the gun control debate |url=http://doddcenter.uconn.edu/asc/research/gun_control.htm |publisher=University of Connecticut |access-date=July 7, 2014 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140707222435/http://doddcenter.uconn.edu/asc/research/gun_control.htm |archive-date=July 7, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://jpfo.org/common-sense/cs34.htm|title=Common Sense|access-date=10 June 2016|archive-date=7 June 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160607210656/http://jpfo.org/common-sense/cs34.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
||
The April 4, 1968, [[assassination of Martin Luther King Jr.]], shortly followed by the June 5 [[assassination of Robert F. Kennedy]], as well as the shooting at the University of Texas [[University of Texas tower shooting|two years previously]], compounded by shifting societal attitudes towards gun ownership, renewed efforts to pass the bill.<ref name=Rosenfeld/> On June 11, 1968, a tie vote in the House Judiciary Committee halted the bill's passage.<ref name=Finney680612>{{cite news |last=Finney |first=John W. |date=June 12, 1968 |title=Gun Control Bill Blocked In House; Panel Deadlocks on Johnson Plan to Curb Rifle Sales – New Vote Is Scheduled |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1968/06/12/archives/gun-control-bill-blocked-in-house-panel-deadlocks-on-johnson-plan.html |page=1 |newspaper=New York Times}}{{subscription}}</ref> On reconsideration nine days later, the bill was passed by the committee. The Senate Judiciary Committee similarly brought the bill to a temporary halt, but as in the House, it was passed on reconsideration.<ref name=NYTimes680621>{{cite news |last=Finney |first=John W. |date=June 21, 1968 |title=Senate Due To Act Today; House Unit Votes Gun Bill, But Senate Panel Delays It House Committee Vote |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1968/06/21/archives/senate-due-to-act-today-house-unit-votes-gun-bill-but-senate-panel.html |page=1 |newspaper=New York Times}}{{subscription}}</ref> House Resolution 17735, known as the Gun Control Act, was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on October 22, 1968<ref name=LBJ681022>{{cite web |url=http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=29197 |title=553 – Remarks Upon Signing the Gun Control Act of 1968. |last=Johnson |first=Lyndon B. |date=October 22, 1968 |website=presidency.ucsb.edu |publisher=Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project. |access-date=October 9, 2013 |archive-date=September 9, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180909202137/http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=29197 |url-status=dead }}</ref> banning mail |
The April 4, 1968, [[assassination of Martin Luther King Jr.]], shortly followed by the June 5 [[assassination of Robert F. Kennedy]], as well as the shooting at the University of Texas [[University of Texas tower shooting|two years previously]], compounded by shifting societal attitudes towards gun ownership, renewed efforts to pass the bill.<ref name=Rosenfeld/> On June 11, 1968, a tie vote in the House Judiciary Committee halted the bill's passage.<ref name=Finney680612>{{cite news |last=Finney |first=John W. |date=June 12, 1968 |title=Gun Control Bill Blocked In House; Panel Deadlocks on Johnson Plan to Curb Rifle Sales – New Vote Is Scheduled |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1968/06/12/archives/gun-control-bill-blocked-in-house-panel-deadlocks-on-johnson-plan.html |page=1 |newspaper=New York Times}}{{subscription required}}</ref> On reconsideration nine days later, the bill was passed by the committee. The [[United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary|Senate Judiciary Committee]] similarly brought the bill to a temporary halt, but as in the House, it was passed on reconsideration.<ref name=NYTimes680621>{{cite news |last=Finney |first=John W. |date=June 21, 1968 |title=Senate Due To Act Today; House Unit Votes Gun Bill, But Senate Panel Delays It House Committee Vote |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1968/06/21/archives/senate-due-to-act-today-house-unit-votes-gun-bill-but-senate-panel.html |page=1 |newspaper=New York Times}}{{subscription required}}</ref> House Resolution 17735, known as the Gun Control Act, was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on October 22, 1968<ref name=LBJ681022>{{cite web |url=http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=29197 |title=553 – Remarks Upon Signing the Gun Control Act of 1968. |last=Johnson |first=Lyndon B. |date=October 22, 1968 |website=presidency.ucsb.edu |publisher=Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project. |access-date=October 9, 2013 |archive-date=September 9, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180909202137/http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=29197 |url-status=dead }}</ref> banning mail-order sales of rifles and shotguns and prohibiting most felons, drug users, and people found mentally incompetent from buying guns.<ref name=Dolak131121>{{cite news |last=Dolak |first=Kevin |date=November 21, 2013 |title=Gun Debate Spurred by Kennedy Assassination Rages on Today |url=https://abcnews.go.com/US/gun-debate-spurred-kennedy-assassination-rages-today/story?id=20677433|publisher=ABC News Internet Ventures |access-date=July 7, 2014 }}</ref><ref name=CBS130413>{{cite news |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |date=April 13, 2013 |title=U.S. gun control: A history of tragedy, legislative action |url=http://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-gun-control-a-history-of-tragedy-legislative-action/|publisher=CBS Interactive |access-date=July 7, 2014 }}</ref>This act also included provisions that redefined the definitions of firearms within the United States and provided more rules for weapons manufacturers and licensed sellers on interstate commerce of ammunition and other firearm accessories.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Zimring |first=Franklin E. |date=1975 |title=Firearms and Federal Law: The Gun Control Act of 1968 |url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/724104 |journal=The Journal of Legal Studies |volume=4 |issue=1 |pages=133–198 |doi=10.1086/467528 |jstor=724104 |issn=0047-2530}}</ref> |
||
==Prohibited persons== |
==Prohibited persons== |
||
When it took effect in 1968, the Gun Control Act of 1968 stated that firearm sales were prohibited to anyone who "(1) is under indictment for, or has been convicted in a court of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year; (2) is a fugitive from justice; (3) is an unlawful user of or addicted to marihuana or any depressant or stimulant drug (as defined in section 201 (v) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) or narcotic drug (as defined in section 4731 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954)"<ref>https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-82/pdf/STATUTE-82-Pg1213-2.pdf</ref> |
|||
⚫ | The Gun Control Act of 1968 was amended in 1993 by the [[Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act]] which introduced a background check requirement of prospective gun purchasers by licensed sellers, and created a list of categories of individuals to whom the sale of firearms is prohibited:<ref>[https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/922 18 U.S.C. 922 (d)]</ref> |
||
⚫ | The Gun Control Act of 1968 was amended in 1993 by the [[Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act]] which introduced a background check requirement of prospective gun purchasers by licensed sellers, and created a list of categories of individuals to whom the sale of firearms is prohibited:<ref>[https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/922 18 U.S.C. 922 (d)]</ref> It would also be amended again in 1994 by the [[Violence Against Women Act]] to strengthen firearm bans against domestic abusers.<ref name=1994domesticbanextention>{{cite news|url=https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2024/06/supreme-court-upholds-law-disarming-domestic-abusers/|title=Supreme Court Upholds Law Disarming Domestic Abusers|first=Nina|last=Martin|publisher=Mother Jones|date=June 21, 2024|accessdate=June 21, 2024}}</ref> The amended law stated: |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
(1) is under indictment for, or has been convicted in any court of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year; |
(1) is under indictment for, or has been convicted in any court of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year; |
||
Line 63: | Line 66: | ||
(2) is a fugitive from justice; |
(2) is a fugitive from justice; |
||
(3) is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802)); |
(3) is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the [[Controlled Substances Act]] (21 U.S.C. 802)); |
||
(4) has been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to any mental institution; |
(4) has been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to any mental institution; |
||
Line 69: | Line 72: | ||
(5) who, being an alien; |
(5) who, being an alien; |
||
: (A) is illegally or unlawfully in the United States; or |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
(6) who has been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions; |
(6) who has been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions; |
||
Line 79: | Line 81: | ||
(8) is subject to a court order that restrains such person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner of such person or child of such intimate partner or person, or engaging in other conduct that would place an intimate partner in reasonable fear of bodily injury to the partner or child, except that this paragraph shall only apply to a court order that— |
(8) is subject to a court order that restrains such person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner of such person or child of such intimate partner or person, or engaging in other conduct that would place an intimate partner in reasonable fear of bodily injury to the partner or child, except that this paragraph shall only apply to a court order that— |
||
: (A) was issued after a hearing of which such person received actual notice, and at which such person had the opportunity to participate; and |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
With the following exceptions:<ref>[https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/921#a_33_B_ii 18 U.S.C. 921 (a)(33)(B)].</ref> |
With the following exceptions:<ref>[https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/921#a_33_B_ii 18 U.S.C. 921 (a)(33)(B)].</ref> |
||
<blockquote>(ii) A person shall not be considered to have been convicted of such an offense for purposes of this chapter if the conviction has been expunged or set aside, or is an offense for which the person has been pardoned or has had civil rights restored (if the law of the applicable jurisdiction provides for the loss of civil rights under such an offense) unless the pardon, expungement, or restoration of civil rights expressly provides that the person may not ship, transport, possess, or receive firearms.</blockquote> |
<blockquote>(ii) A person shall not be considered to have been convicted of such an offense for purposes of this chapter if the conviction has been expunged or set aside, or is an offense for which the person has been pardoned or has had civil rights restored (if the law of the applicable jurisdiction provides for the loss of civil rights under such an offense) unless the pardon, expungement, or restoration of civil rights expressly provides that the person may not ship, transport, possess, or receive firearms.</blockquote> |
||
18 U.S.C 922 (3) imposes punishment for being a drug addict, which was found to be unconstitutional by [[Supreme Court of the United States|SCOTUS]] in [[Robinson v. California]] in 1962. |
|||
While many states upon completion of sentence automatically reinstate rights to vote, sit on a jury, or serve in public office, no states restore gun ownership rights upon completion of sentence.<ref>{{Cite web |date=October 1996 |title=Civil Disabilities of Convicted Felons: A State-by-State Survey |url=https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/pardon/pages/attachments/2015/04/24/civil_disabilities_of_convicted_felons.a_state.by_.state_survey.pdf |website=Department of Justice}}</ref> Some states reinstate rights depending on the crime convicted of, and others have a petition process. Those convicted of a federal offense must contact the Office of the Pardon Attorney, Department of Justice, to receive a presidential pardon. Under the Department's rules governing petitions for executive clemency, 28 C.F.R. §§ 1.1 et seq., an applicant must satisfy a minimum waiting period of five years before he becomes eligible to apply for a presidential pardon of his federal conviction. |
While many states upon completion of a sentence automatically reinstate rights to vote, sit on a jury, or serve in public office, no states restore gun ownership rights upon completion of a sentence.<ref>{{Cite web |date=October 1996 |title=Civil Disabilities of Convicted Felons: A State-by-State Survey |url=https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/pardon/pages/attachments/2015/04/24/civil_disabilities_of_convicted_felons.a_state.by_.state_survey.pdf |website=Department of Justice}}</ref> Some states reinstate rights depending on the crime convicted of, and others have a petition process. Those convicted of a federal offense must contact the Office of the Pardon Attorney, Department of Justice, to receive a presidential pardon. Under the Department's rules governing petitions for executive clemency, 28 C.F.R. §§ 1.1 et seq., an applicant must satisfy a minimum waiting period of five years before he becomes eligible to apply for a presidential pardon of his federal conviction. |
||
According to a 21 Sep 2011 "Open Letter to All Federal Firearms Licensees" from ATF, holders of state-issued [[medical marijuana]] cards are automatically "prohibited people" under 18 U.S.C 922 (g)(3) and "shipping, transporting, receiving or possessing firearms or ammunition" by a medical marijuana card holder is a violation.<ref name=Herbert110926>{{cite web |last=Herbert |first=Arthur |date=September 26, 2011 |title=Open Letter to All Federal Firearms Licensees |url=http://www.atf.gov/press/releases/2011/09/092611-atf-open-letter-to-all-ffls-marijuana-for-medicinal-purposes.pdf |website=atf.gov |publisher=U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130216212205/http://www.atf.gov/press/releases/2011/09/092611-atf-open-letter-to-all-ffls-marijuana-for-medicinal-purposes.pdf |archive-date=February 16, 2013}}</ref> |
According to a 21 Sep 2011 "Open Letter to All Federal Firearms Licensees" from the ATF, holders of state-issued [[medical marijuana]] cards are automatically "prohibited people" under 18 U.S.C 922 (g)(3) and "shipping, transporting, receiving or possessing firearms or ammunition" by a medical marijuana card holder is a violation.<ref name=Herbert110926>{{cite web |last=Herbert |first=Arthur |date=September 26, 2011 |title=Open Letter to All Federal Firearms Licensees |url=http://www.atf.gov/press/releases/2011/09/092611-atf-open-letter-to-all-ffls-marijuana-for-medicinal-purposes.pdf |website=atf.gov |publisher=U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130216212205/http://www.atf.gov/press/releases/2011/09/092611-atf-open-letter-to-all-ffls-marijuana-for-medicinal-purposes.pdf |archive-date=February 16, 2013}}</ref> |
||
Additionally, 18 U.S.C 922 (x) generally prohibits people under 18 years of age from possessing handguns or handgun ammunition with certain exceptions for employment, target practice, education, and a handgun possessed while defending the home of the juvenile or a home in which they are |
Additionally, 18 U.S.C 922 (x) generally prohibits people under 18 years of age from possessing handguns or handgun ammunition with certain exceptions for employment, target practice, education, and a handgun possessed while defending the home of the juvenile or a home in which they are a guest.<ref name=atfref>{{cite web |url=https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/922 |title=18 U.S. Code § 922 – Unlawful acts |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.-->|website=law.cornell.edu |publisher=Legal Information Institute (LII)}}</ref> |
||
The [[Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act|Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993]] created the [[National Instant Criminal Background Check System]] (NICS) to prevent firearms sales to such prohibited people. |
The [[Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act|Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993]] created the [[National Instant Criminal Background Check System]] (NICS) to prevent firearms sales to such prohibited people. |
||
The [[Violence Against Women Act|Violence Against Women Act of 1994]] strengthened bans against domestic abusers by enforcing domestic violence protection orders which barred people subject to family violence protection orders from having firearms.<ref name=1994domesticbanextention /> |
|||
==Federal Firearms License (FFL) system== |
==Federal Firearms License (FFL) system== |
||
Line 110: | Line 113: | ||
Private sales between unlicensed individuals who are residents of the same state are allowed under federal law so long as such transfers do not violate the other existing federal and state laws. While current law mandates that a background check be performed if the seller has a federal firearms license, private parties living in the same state are not required to perform such checks under federal law. |
Private sales between unlicensed individuals who are residents of the same state are allowed under federal law so long as such transfers do not violate the other existing federal and state laws. While current law mandates that a background check be performed if the seller has a federal firearms license, private parties living in the same state are not required to perform such checks under federal law. |
||
A person who does not have a [[Federal Firearms License]] may not be ''in the business'' of buying or selling firearms. Individuals buying and selling firearms without a federal license must be doing so from their |
A person who does not have a [[Federal Firearms License]] may not be ''in the business'' of buying or selling firearms. Individuals buying and selling firearms without a federal license must be doing so from their collection. |
||
Under the Gun Control Act, a federally licensed importer, manufacturer, dealer or collector shall not sell or deliver any rifle or shotgun or ammunition for rifle or shotgun to any individual less than 18 years of age, nor any handgun or ammunition for a handgun to any individual less than 21 years of age.<ref name=ATFP5300-4>{{cite web |url=http://www.atf.gov/publications/download/p/atf-p-5300-4.pdf |title=Federal Firearms Regulations Reference Guide 2005 |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |year=2005|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091231162211/http://www.atf.gov/publications/download/p/atf-p-5300-4.pdf |archive-date=December 31, 2009}}</ref> |
Under the Gun Control Act, a federally licensed importer, manufacturer, dealer, or collector shall not sell or deliver any rifle or shotgun or ammunition for rifle or shotgun to any individual less than 18 years of age, nor any handgun or ammunition for a handgun to any individual less than 21 years of age.<ref name=ATFP5300-4>{{cite web |url=http://www.atf.gov/publications/download/p/atf-p-5300-4.pdf |title=Federal Firearms Regulations Reference Guide 2005 |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |year=2005|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091231162211/http://www.atf.gov/publications/download/p/atf-p-5300-4.pdf |archive-date=December 31, 2009}}</ref> |
||
===Gunsmith and factory repair exception=== |
===Gunsmith and factory repair exception=== |
||
While the Gun Control Act prohibits the direct mail-ordering of firearms, a person may ship a gun via contract carrier (such as [[United Parcel Service]] (UPS), [[United States Postal Service]] or [[FedEx]]) to a [[gunsmith]] (who has an FFL) or the gunmaker's factory for repairs or modification. After the repair work is done, the gunsmith or the factory can ship the gun directly back to the customer. |
While the Gun Control Act prohibits the direct mail-ordering of firearms, a person may ship a gun via contract carrier (such as [[United Parcel Service]] (UPS), [[United States Postal Service]], or [[FedEx]]) to a [[gunsmith]] (who has an FFL) or the gunmaker's factory for repairs or modification. After the repair work is done, the gunsmith or the factory can ship the gun directly back to the customer. |
||
==Import restrictions== |
==Import restrictions== |
||
[[File:ATF form 4590.png|thumb|284x284px|[[Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives|ATF]] Form 4590 ("Factoring Criteria for Weapons")]] |
[[File:ATF form 4590.png|thumb|284x284px|[[Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives|ATF]] Form 4590 ("Factoring Criteria for Weapons")]] |
||
The GCA created what is known as the "sporting purposes" standard for imported firearms, saying that they must "be generally recognized as particularly suitable for or readily adaptable to sporting purposes". GCA sporting purposes |
The GCA created what is known as the "sporting purposes" standard for imported firearms, saying that they must "be generally recognized as particularly suitable for or readily adaptable to sporting purposes". GCA sporting purposes include [[hunting]] and organized competitive target shooting but do not include "[[plinking]]" or "[[practical shooting]]" (which the ATF says is closer to police/combat-style competition and not comparable to more traditional types of sports), nor does it allow for collection for historical or design interest.<ref name=ATFtypscope>{{Cite web |url=http://www.atf.treas.gov/pub/treas_pub/assault_rifles/typscope.pdf |title=''Defining the type of weapon under review'', The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives |access-date=2007-05-10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080920043945/http://atf.treas.gov/pub/treas_pub/assault_rifles/typscope.pdf |archive-date=2008-09-20 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref name=DOT1998>{{cite web |url=https://www.atf.gov/files/publications/download/treas/treas-study-on-sporting-suitability-of-modified-semiautomatic-assault-rifles.pdf |title=Department of the Treasury Study on the Sporting Suitability of Modified Semiautomatic Assault Rifles |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |date=April 1998 |website=atf.gov}}</ref>{{rp|16–18}} |
||
==Marking requirements== |
==Marking requirements== |
||
The law also required that all newly manufactured firearms produced by licensed manufacturers in the United States and imported into the United States bear a [[gun serial number]]. Firearms manufactured |
The law also required that all newly manufactured firearms produced by licensed manufacturers in the United States and imported into the United States bear a [[gun serial number]]. Firearms manufactured before the Gun Control Act and firearms manufactured by non-FFLs remain exempt from the serial number requirement. Defacement or removal of the serial number (if present) became a [[felony]] offense under the law where previously no serial number was required. |
||
{{anchor|Criticism}} |
{{anchor|Criticism}} |
||
Line 131: | Line 134: | ||
In his remarks upon signing the act in October 1968, Johnson said: |
In his remarks upon signing the act in October 1968, Johnson said: |
||
<blockquote>Congress adopted most of our recommendations. But this bill—as big as this bill is—still falls short, because we just could not get the Congress to carry out the requests we made of them. I asked for the national registration of all guns and the licensing of those who carry those guns. For the fact of life is that there are over 160 million guns in this country—more firearms than families. If guns are to be kept out of the hands of the criminal, out of the hands of the insane, and out of the hands of the irresponsible, then we just must have licensing. If the criminal with a gun is to be tracked down quickly, then we must have registration in this country. The voices that blocked these safeguards were not the voices of an aroused nation. They were the voices of a powerful lobby, a gun lobby, that has prevailed for the moment in an election year.<ref name=LBJ681022/></blockquote> |
<blockquote>"Congress adopted most of our recommendations. But this bill—as big as this bill is—still falls short, because we just could not get the Congress to carry out the requests we made of them. I asked for the national registration of all guns and the licensing of those who carry those guns. For the fact of life is that there are over 160 million guns in this country—more firearms than families. If guns are to be kept out of the hands of the criminal, out of the hands of the insane, and out of the hands of the irresponsible, then we just must have licensing. If the criminal with a gun is to be tracked down quickly, then we must have registration in this country. The voices that blocked these safeguards were not the voices of an aroused nation. They were the voices of a powerful lobby, a gun lobby, that has prevailed for the moment in an election year."<ref name=LBJ681022/></blockquote> |
||
At the time of its passage in 1968, NRA executive vice president [[Franklin Orth]] wrote in ''American Rifleman'' that "the measure as a whole appears to be one that the sportsmen of America can live with".<ref>{{cite book |last1=Waldman |first1=Michael |title=The Second Amendment: A Biography |date=2014 |publisher=Simon and Schuster |isbn=978-1-4767-4746-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kSsGAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT95}}</ref>{{rp|95}}<ref>{{cite news |last1=Achenbach |first1=Joel |last2=Higham |first2=Scott |last3=Horwitz |first3=Sari |title=How NRA's true believers converted a marksmanship group into a mighty gun lobby |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-nras-true-believers-converted-a-marksmanship-group-into-a-mighty-gun-lobby/2013/01/12/51c62288-59b9-11e2-88d0-c4cf65c3ad15_story.html |access-date=6 July 2014 |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=12 January 2013}}</ref> |
At the time of its passage in 1968, NRA executive vice president [[Franklin Orth]] wrote in ''American Rifleman'' that "the measure as a whole appears to be one that the sportsmen of America can live with".<ref>{{cite book |last1=Waldman |first1=Michael |title=The Second Amendment: A Biography |date=2014 |publisher=Simon and Schuster |isbn=978-1-4767-4746-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kSsGAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT95}}</ref>{{rp|95}}<ref>{{cite news |last1=Achenbach |first1=Joel |last2=Higham |first2=Scott |last3=Horwitz |first3=Sari |title=How NRA's true believers converted a marksmanship group into a mighty gun lobby |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-nras-true-believers-converted-a-marksmanship-group-into-a-mighty-gun-lobby/2013/01/12/51c62288-59b9-11e2-88d0-c4cf65c3ad15_story.html |access-date=6 July 2014 |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=12 January 2013}}</ref> |
||
Line 137: | Line 140: | ||
In the May 1993 issue of ''[[Guns & Ammo]]'' magazine, [[Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership]] (JPFO) compared the GCA to [[Nazi gun control argument|Nazi gun laws]].<ref name=TGRWp285>{{cite book |last=Knox |first=Neal |author-link=Neal Knox |year=2009 |orig-year=1993 |chapter=JPFO Proves Me Wrong |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dA3pGSYG2yIC&pg=PA285 |editor-last=Knox |editor-first=Chris |title=The Gun Rights War: Dispatches from the Front Lines |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3LSE2QfOCSoC |publisher=MacFarlane |isbn=9780976863304 |oclc=423586835}}</ref><ref name=Gunfightp83>{{cite book |last=Winkler |first=Adam |title=Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear Arms in America |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CR1YBPB5nmkC&pg=PA83 |year=2011 |publisher=Norton |isbn=9780393077414 }}</ref> |
In the May 1993 issue of ''[[Guns & Ammo]]'' magazine, [[Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership]] (JPFO) compared the GCA to [[Nazi gun control argument|Nazi gun laws]].<ref name=TGRWp285>{{cite book |last=Knox |first=Neal |author-link=Neal Knox |year=2009 |orig-year=1993 |chapter=JPFO Proves Me Wrong |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dA3pGSYG2yIC&pg=PA285 |editor-last=Knox |editor-first=Chris |title=The Gun Rights War: Dispatches from the Front Lines |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3LSE2QfOCSoC |publisher=MacFarlane |isbn=9780976863304 |oclc=423586835}}</ref><ref name=Gunfightp83>{{cite book |last=Winkler |first=Adam |title=Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear Arms in America |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CR1YBPB5nmkC&pg=PA83 |year=2011 |publisher=Norton |isbn=9780393077414 }}</ref> |
||
In a 2011 article noting the death of former U.S. Senator [[James A. McClure]], the NRA called provisions of the GCA "draconian".<ref name=Norell2011>{{cite web |url=http://www.nrapublications.org/index.php/9222/passing-of-a-legend/ |title=Passing of a Legend |last=Norell |first=James O. E. |year=2011 |website=nrapublications.org |publisher=National Rifle Association |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120506212824/http://www.nrapublications.org/index.php/9222/passing-of-a-legend/ |archive-date=May 6, 2012 |access-date=July 5, 2014 }}</ref> McClure was cosponsor of the [[Firearm Owners Protection Act]] (FOPA) of 1986, also called the McClure-Volkmer Act.<ref name=Norell2011/> |
In a 2011 article noting the death of former U.S. Senator [[James A. McClure]], the NRA called provisions of the GCA "draconian".<ref name=Norell2011>{{cite web |url=http://www.nrapublications.org/index.php/9222/passing-of-a-legend/ |title=Passing of a Legend |last=Norell |first=James O. E. |year=2011 |website=nrapublications.org |publisher=National Rifle Association |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120506212824/http://www.nrapublications.org/index.php/9222/passing-of-a-legend/ |archive-date=May 6, 2012 |access-date=July 5, 2014 }}</ref> McClure was a cosponsor of the [[Firearm Owners Protection Act]] (FOPA) of 1986, also called the McClure-Volkmer Act.<ref name=Norell2011/> |
||
Political scientist [[Robert Spitzer (political scientist)|Robert Spitzer]] wrote in 2011 that the Gun Control Act of 1968 "provides an ideal case study to highlight the political processes affecting a direct effort to regulate firearms".<ref name=MoralControversiesp175>{{cite book |last=Spitzer |first=Robert J. |year=2011 |chapter=Gun Control: Constitutional Mandate or Myth? |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NT50S7-X0jMC&pg=PA175 |editor1-last=Tatalovich |editor1-first=Raymond |editor2-last=Daynes |editor2-first=Byron W. |title=Moral Controversies in American Politics |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NT50S7-X0jMC |page=175 |publisher=M.E. Sharpe |isbn=9780765627452 }}</ref> He also stated in his book that President Johnson's proposal called for national registration of all guns as well as licensing for all gun carriers,<ref name=LBJ681022/> but his influence over the enacted law was small.<ref name=MoralControversiesp175/> House Rules Committee chair [[William Colmer]] only released H.R. 17735 to the floor after Judiciary Committee chair [[Emanuel Celler]] promised to oppose efforts to add licensing and registration provisions.<ref name=MoralControversiesp176>{{cite book |last=Spitzer |first=Robert J. |year=2011 |chapter=Gun Control: Constitutional Mandate or Myth? |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NT50S7-X0jMC&pg=PA176 |editor1-last=Tatalovich |editor1-first=Raymond |editor2-last=Daynes |editor2-first=Byron W. |title=Moral Controversies in American Politics |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NT50S7-X0jMC |page=176 |publisher=M.E. Sharpe |isbn=9780765627452 }}</ref> |
Political scientist [[Robert Spitzer (political scientist)|Robert Spitzer]] wrote in 2011 that the Gun Control Act of 1968 "provides an ideal case study to highlight the political processes affecting a direct effort to regulate firearms".<ref name=MoralControversiesp175>{{cite book |last=Spitzer |first=Robert J. |year=2011 |chapter=Gun Control: Constitutional Mandate or Myth? |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NT50S7-X0jMC&pg=PA175 |editor1-last=Tatalovich |editor1-first=Raymond |editor2-last=Daynes |editor2-first=Byron W. |title=Moral Controversies in American Politics |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NT50S7-X0jMC |page=175 |publisher=M.E. Sharpe |isbn=9780765627452 }}</ref> He also stated in his book that President Johnson's proposal called for national registration of all guns as well as licensing for all gun carriers,<ref name=LBJ681022/> but his influence over the enacted law was small.<ref name=MoralControversiesp175/> House Rules Committee chair [[William Colmer]] only released H.R. 17735 to the floor after Judiciary Committee chair [[Emanuel Celler]] promised to oppose efforts to add licensing and registration provisions.<ref name=MoralControversiesp176>{{cite book |last=Spitzer |first=Robert J. |year=2011 |chapter=Gun Control: Constitutional Mandate or Myth? |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NT50S7-X0jMC&pg=PA176 |editor1-last=Tatalovich |editor1-first=Raymond |editor2-last=Daynes |editor2-first=Byron W. |title=Moral Controversies in American Politics |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NT50S7-X0jMC |page=176 |publisher=M.E. Sharpe |isbn=9780765627452 }}</ref> |
||
==Case law== |
|||
*[[Lane v. Holder]] (District case 1:1 lcv503, Appellate case 11-1847) |
|||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
Line 152: | Line 152: | ||
==Further reading== |
==Further reading== |
||
*{{cite journal |last=Zimring |first=Frank |year=1968 |title=Is Gun Control Likely to Reduce Violent Killings? |journal=The University of Chicago Law Review |volume=35 |issue=4 |pages=721–737 |doi=10.2307/1598883 |jstor=1598883 |oclc=65016157|url=https://works.bepress.com/franklin_zimring/361/download/ }} |
*{{cite journal |last=Zimring |first=Frank |year=1968 |title=Is Gun Control Likely to Reduce Violent Killings? |journal=The University of Chicago Law Review |volume=35 |issue=4 |pages=721–737 |doi=10.2307/1598883 |jstor=1598883 |oclc=65016157 |url=https://works.bepress.com/franklin_zimring/361/download/ }}{{Dead link|date=June 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }} |
||
*{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.005 |title=Firearms laws and the reduction of violence |year=2005 |last1=Hahn |first1=Robert A. |last2=Bilukha |first2=Oleg |last3=Crosby |first3=Alex |last4=Fullilove |first4=Mindy T. |last5=Liberman |first5=Akiva |last6=Moscicki |first6=Eve |last7=Snyder |first7=Susan |last8=Tuma |first8=Farris |last9=Briss |first9=Peter A. |journal=American Journal of Preventive Medicine |volume=28 |issue=2 |pages=40–71 |pmid=15698747 |url=http://www.thecommunityguide.org/violence/viol-AJPM-evrev-firearms-law.pdf |display-authors=8 |author10=Task Force on Community Preventive Services |access-date=2012-10-30 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130331205202/http://www.thecommunityguide.org/violence/viol-AJPM-evrev-firearms-law.pdf |archive-date=2013-03-31 |url-status=dead }} |
*{{cite journal |doi=10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.005 |title=Firearms laws and the reduction of violence |year=2005 |last1=Hahn |first1=Robert A. |last2=Bilukha |first2=Oleg |last3=Crosby |first3=Alex |last4=Fullilove |first4=Mindy T. |last5=Liberman |first5=Akiva |last6=Moscicki |first6=Eve |last7=Snyder |first7=Susan |last8=Tuma |first8=Farris |last9=Briss |first9=Peter A. |journal=American Journal of Preventive Medicine |volume=28 |issue=2 |pages=40–71 |pmid=15698747 |url=http://www.thecommunityguide.org/violence/viol-AJPM-evrev-firearms-law.pdf |display-authors=8 |author10=Task Force on Community Preventive Services |access-date=2012-10-30 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130331205202/http://www.thecommunityguide.org/violence/viol-AJPM-evrev-firearms-law.pdf |archive-date=2013-03-31 |url-status=dead }} |
||
Line 158: | Line 158: | ||
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-44 As codified in 18 U.S.C. chapter 44] of the [[United States Code]] from [[Legal Information Institute|LII]] |
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-44 As codified in 18 U.S.C. chapter 44] of the [[United States Code]] from [[Legal Information Institute|LII]] |
||
* [https://uscode.house.gov/browse/prelim@title18/part1/chapter44&edition=prelim As codified in 18 U.S.C. chapter 44] of the [[United States Code]] from the [[United States House of Representatives|US House of Representatives]] |
* [https://uscode.house.gov/browse/prelim@title18/part1/chapter44&edition=prelim As codified in 18 U.S.C. chapter 44] of the [[United States Code]] from the [[United States House of Representatives|US House of Representatives]] |
||
* [https://www.govinfo.gov/link/statute/90/public/618?link-type=pdf&.pdf Gun Control Act of 1968] as enacted ([https://www.govinfo.gov/link/statute/90/public/618?link-type=details details]) in the [[United States Statutes at Large|US Statutes at Large]] |
|||
*[https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/90/hr17735/text Text of H.R. 17735 (90th): An Act to amend title 18, United States Code, to provide for better control of the interstate traffic in firearms (Passed Congress/Enrolled Bill) – GovTrack.us] |
|||
*[https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/90/hr17735 H.R. 17735] on [[GovTrack]] |
|||
{{Lyndon B. Johnson}} |
{{Lyndon B. Johnson}} |
Latest revision as of 03:46, 18 November 2024
Other short titles | State Firearms Control Assistance Act |
---|---|
Long title | An Act to amend title 18, United States Code, to provide for better control of the interstate traffic in firearms. |
Acronyms (colloquial) | GCA, GCA68 |
Enacted by | the 90th United States Congress |
Effective | October 22, 1968 |
Citations | |
Public law | 90-618 |
Statutes at Large | 82 Stat. 1213-2 |
Codification | |
Titles amended | 18 U.S.C.: Crimes and Criminal Procedure |
U.S.C. sections amended | 18 U.S.C. ch. 44 § 921 |
Legislative history | |
| |
Major amendments | |
United States Supreme Court cases | |
List
|
The Gun Control Act of 1968 (GCA or GCA68)[1] is a U.S. federal law that regulates the firearms industry and firearms ownership. Due to constitutional limitations, the Act is primarily based on regulating interstate commerce in firearms by generally prohibiting interstate firearms transfers except by manufacturers, dealers and importers licensed under a scheme set up under the Act.
The GCA was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on October 22, 1968, and is Title I of the U.S. federal firearms laws. The National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA) is Title II. Both GCA and NFA are enforced by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF).
18 USC chapter 44 was first enacted by the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. GCA repealed the Federal Firearms Act of 1938, though many of its provisions were reenacted as part of the GCA, which revised the FFA and its predecessor, the National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA).[2]
History
[edit]The bill was initially prompted by the assassination of U.S. President John F. Kennedy in 1963.[3] The President was shot and killed with a rifle purchased by mail order from an ad in the magazine American Rifleman.[4] Congressional hearings followed and a ban on mail-order gun sales was discussed, but no law was passed until 1968. At the hearings NRA Executive Vice-President Franklin Orth supported a ban on mail-order sales, stating, "We do not think that any sane American, who calls himself an American, can object to placing into this bill the instrument which killed the president of the United States."[5][6]
Precursors of the passage of the Gun Control Act were Senate Bill 1975[7] in 1963, "A Bill to Regulate the Interstate Shipment of Firearms", and Senate Bill 1592 in 1965, "A Bill to Amend the Federal Firearms Act of 1938". Both were introduced by Senator Thomas J. Dodd but in both cases the bill was met with fierce opposition, effectively shutting down the earliest efforts for gun control legislation regarding the mail-order rifles. The bill was once again introduced into the House of Representatives by the House Judiciary Committee on January 10, 1967[8], with this instance resulting in the bill staying on the legislative docket.[9][10]
The April 4, 1968, assassination of Martin Luther King Jr., shortly followed by the June 5 assassination of Robert F. Kennedy, as well as the shooting at the University of Texas two years previously, compounded by shifting societal attitudes towards gun ownership, renewed efforts to pass the bill.[5] On June 11, 1968, a tie vote in the House Judiciary Committee halted the bill's passage.[11] On reconsideration nine days later, the bill was passed by the committee. The Senate Judiciary Committee similarly brought the bill to a temporary halt, but as in the House, it was passed on reconsideration.[12] House Resolution 17735, known as the Gun Control Act, was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on October 22, 1968[13] banning mail-order sales of rifles and shotguns and prohibiting most felons, drug users, and people found mentally incompetent from buying guns.[14][15]This act also included provisions that redefined the definitions of firearms within the United States and provided more rules for weapons manufacturers and licensed sellers on interstate commerce of ammunition and other firearm accessories.[16]
Prohibited persons
[edit]When it took effect in 1968, the Gun Control Act of 1968 stated that firearm sales were prohibited to anyone who "(1) is under indictment for, or has been convicted in a court of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year; (2) is a fugitive from justice; (3) is an unlawful user of or addicted to marihuana or any depressant or stimulant drug (as defined in section 201 (v) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) or narcotic drug (as defined in section 4731 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954)"[17]
The Gun Control Act of 1968 was amended in 1993 by the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act which introduced a background check requirement of prospective gun purchasers by licensed sellers, and created a list of categories of individuals to whom the sale of firearms is prohibited:[18] It would also be amended again in 1994 by the Violence Against Women Act to strengthen firearm bans against domestic abusers.[19] The amended law stated:
It shall be unlawful for any person to sell or otherwise dispose of any firearm or ammunition to any person knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that such person—
(1) is under indictment for, or has been convicted in any court of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;
(2) is a fugitive from justice;
(3) is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802));
(4) has been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to any mental institution;
(5) who, being an alien;
- (A) is illegally or unlawfully in the United States; or
- (B) except as provided in subsection (y)(2), has been admitted to the United States under a nonimmigrant visa (as that term is defined in section 101(a)(26) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 (a)(26)))
(6) who has been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions;
(7) who, having been a citizen of the United States, has renounced their citizenship;
(8) is subject to a court order that restrains such person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner of such person or child of such intimate partner or person, or engaging in other conduct that would place an intimate partner in reasonable fear of bodily injury to the partner or child, except that this paragraph shall only apply to a court order that—
- (A) was issued after a hearing of which such person received actual notice, and at which such person had the opportunity to participate; and
- (B)
- (i) includes a finding that such person represents a credible threat to the physical safety of such intimate partner or child; or
- (ii) by its terms explicitly prohibits the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against such intimate partner or child that would reasonably be expected to cause bodily injury; or
(9) has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.
With the following exceptions:[20]
(ii) A person shall not be considered to have been convicted of such an offense for purposes of this chapter if the conviction has been expunged or set aside, or is an offense for which the person has been pardoned or has had civil rights restored (if the law of the applicable jurisdiction provides for the loss of civil rights under such an offense) unless the pardon, expungement, or restoration of civil rights expressly provides that the person may not ship, transport, possess, or receive firearms.
18 U.S.C 922 (3) imposes punishment for being a drug addict, which was found to be unconstitutional by SCOTUS in Robinson v. California in 1962.
While many states upon completion of a sentence automatically reinstate rights to vote, sit on a jury, or serve in public office, no states restore gun ownership rights upon completion of a sentence.[21] Some states reinstate rights depending on the crime convicted of, and others have a petition process. Those convicted of a federal offense must contact the Office of the Pardon Attorney, Department of Justice, to receive a presidential pardon. Under the Department's rules governing petitions for executive clemency, 28 C.F.R. §§ 1.1 et seq., an applicant must satisfy a minimum waiting period of five years before he becomes eligible to apply for a presidential pardon of his federal conviction.
According to a 21 Sep 2011 "Open Letter to All Federal Firearms Licensees" from the ATF, holders of state-issued medical marijuana cards are automatically "prohibited people" under 18 U.S.C 922 (g)(3) and "shipping, transporting, receiving or possessing firearms or ammunition" by a medical marijuana card holder is a violation.[22]
Additionally, 18 U.S.C 922 (x) generally prohibits people under 18 years of age from possessing handguns or handgun ammunition with certain exceptions for employment, target practice, education, and a handgun possessed while defending the home of the juvenile or a home in which they are a guest.[23]
The Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993 created the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) to prevent firearms sales to such prohibited people.
The Violence Against Women Act of 1994 strengthened bans against domestic abusers by enforcing domestic violence protection orders which barred people subject to family violence protection orders from having firearms.[19]
Federal Firearms License (FFL) system
[edit]The Gun Control Act mandated the licensing of individuals and companies engaged in the business of selling firearms. This provision effectively prohibited the direct mail order of firearms (except antique firearms) by consumers and mandated that anyone who wants to buy a gun in an interstate transaction from a source other than a private individual must do so through a federally licensed firearms dealer. The Act also banned unlicensed individuals from acquiring handguns outside their state of residence. The interstate purchase of long guns (rifles and shotguns) was not impeded by the Act so long as the seller is federally licensed and such a sale is allowed by both the state of purchase and the state of residence.
Private sales between residents of two different states are also prohibited without going through a licensed dealer, except for the case of a buyer holding a Curio & Relic license purchasing a firearm that qualifies as a curio or relic.
Private sales between unlicensed individuals who are residents of the same state are allowed under federal law so long as such transfers do not violate the other existing federal and state laws. While current law mandates that a background check be performed if the seller has a federal firearms license, private parties living in the same state are not required to perform such checks under federal law.
A person who does not have a Federal Firearms License may not be in the business of buying or selling firearms. Individuals buying and selling firearms without a federal license must be doing so from their collection.
Under the Gun Control Act, a federally licensed importer, manufacturer, dealer, or collector shall not sell or deliver any rifle or shotgun or ammunition for rifle or shotgun to any individual less than 18 years of age, nor any handgun or ammunition for a handgun to any individual less than 21 years of age.[24]
Gunsmith and factory repair exception
[edit]While the Gun Control Act prohibits the direct mail-ordering of firearms, a person may ship a gun via contract carrier (such as United Parcel Service (UPS), United States Postal Service, or FedEx) to a gunsmith (who has an FFL) or the gunmaker's factory for repairs or modification. After the repair work is done, the gunsmith or the factory can ship the gun directly back to the customer.
Import restrictions
[edit]The GCA created what is known as the "sporting purposes" standard for imported firearms, saying that they must "be generally recognized as particularly suitable for or readily adaptable to sporting purposes". GCA sporting purposes include hunting and organized competitive target shooting but do not include "plinking" or "practical shooting" (which the ATF says is closer to police/combat-style competition and not comparable to more traditional types of sports), nor does it allow for collection for historical or design interest.[25][26]: 16–18
Marking requirements
[edit]The law also required that all newly manufactured firearms produced by licensed manufacturers in the United States and imported into the United States bear a gun serial number. Firearms manufactured before the Gun Control Act and firearms manufactured by non-FFLs remain exempt from the serial number requirement. Defacement or removal of the serial number (if present) became a felony offense under the law where previously no serial number was required.
Commentary
[edit]In a June 1966 essay, Neal Knox wrote that what was then called the Dodd Bill was opposed by outdoorsmen and conservationists Harry R. Woodward, C. R. Gutermuth of the Wildlife Management Institute, Richard H. Stroud of the Sport Fishing Institute, Howard Carter Jr. of the National Shooting Sports Foundation, E. C. Hadley of the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers' Institute, Robert T. Dennis of the Izaak Walton League, "and countless other sportsmen, and sportsmen and industry groups" because it would have a far-reaching and damaging effect on the hunting and shooting sports, while failing to reduce crime.[27]
In his remarks upon signing the act in October 1968, Johnson said:
"Congress adopted most of our recommendations. But this bill—as big as this bill is—still falls short, because we just could not get the Congress to carry out the requests we made of them. I asked for the national registration of all guns and the licensing of those who carry those guns. For the fact of life is that there are over 160 million guns in this country—more firearms than families. If guns are to be kept out of the hands of the criminal, out of the hands of the insane, and out of the hands of the irresponsible, then we just must have licensing. If the criminal with a gun is to be tracked down quickly, then we must have registration in this country. The voices that blocked these safeguards were not the voices of an aroused nation. They were the voices of a powerful lobby, a gun lobby, that has prevailed for the moment in an election year."[13]
At the time of its passage in 1968, NRA executive vice president Franklin Orth wrote in American Rifleman that "the measure as a whole appears to be one that the sportsmen of America can live with".[28]: 95 [29]
In the May 1993 issue of Guns & Ammo magazine, Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership (JPFO) compared the GCA to Nazi gun laws.[30][31]
In a 2011 article noting the death of former U.S. Senator James A. McClure, the NRA called provisions of the GCA "draconian".[32] McClure was a cosponsor of the Firearm Owners Protection Act (FOPA) of 1986, also called the McClure-Volkmer Act.[32]
Political scientist Robert Spitzer wrote in 2011 that the Gun Control Act of 1968 "provides an ideal case study to highlight the political processes affecting a direct effort to regulate firearms".[33] He also stated in his book that President Johnson's proposal called for national registration of all guns as well as licensing for all gun carriers,[13] but his influence over the enacted law was small.[33] House Rules Committee chair William Colmer only released H.R. 17735 to the floor after Judiciary Committee chair Emanuel Celler promised to oppose efforts to add licensing and registration provisions.[34]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ "Gun Control Act of 1968", Encyclopedia of the Fourth Amendment, 2300 N Street, NW, Suite 800, Washington DC 20037 United States: CQ Press, 2013, doi:10.4135/9781452234243.n342, ISBN 978-1-60426-589-7, retrieved 2024-11-17
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: location (link) - ^ "Key Congressional Acts Related to Firearms". smartgunlaws.org. Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. May 21, 2012. Retrieved July 6, 2014.
- ^ Michaud, Jon (April 19, 2012). "The Birth of the Modern Gun Debate". The New Yorker.
- ^ Bugliosi, Vincent (2007). Reclaiming History: The Assassination of John F. Kennedy. W.W. Norton & Co. p. 200. ISBN 978-0-393-04525-3.
- ^ a b Rosenfeld, Steven (January 14, 2013). "The NRA once supported gun control". Salon. Salon Media Group. Retrieved July 7, 2014.
- ^ Davidson, Osha Gray (1998). Under Fire: The NRA and the Battle for Gun Control. University of Iowa Press. p. 30. ISBN 978-1-58729-042-8.
- ^ Vizzard, William J. (1999). "The Gun Control Act of 1968". Saint Louis University Public Law Review. 18. Retrieved 6 October 2024.
- ^ Pal, Anupama (2014-09-09). "Legal research on ProQuest databases: a survey of Legislative Insight and Congressional". Reference Reviews. 28 (7): 8–10. doi:10.1108/rr-12-2013-0314. ISSN 0950-4125.
- ^ "Sources for Connecticut's role in the gun control debate". University of Connecticut. 2014. Archived from the original on July 7, 2014. Retrieved July 7, 2014.
- ^ "Common Sense". Archived from the original on 7 June 2016. Retrieved 10 June 2016.
- ^ Finney, John W. (June 12, 1968). "Gun Control Bill Blocked In House; Panel Deadlocks on Johnson Plan to Curb Rifle Sales – New Vote Is Scheduled". New York Times. p. 1.(subscription required)
- ^ Finney, John W. (June 21, 1968). "Senate Due To Act Today; House Unit Votes Gun Bill, But Senate Panel Delays It House Committee Vote". New York Times. p. 1.(subscription required)
- ^ a b c Johnson, Lyndon B. (October 22, 1968). "553 – Remarks Upon Signing the Gun Control Act of 1968". presidency.ucsb.edu. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project. Archived from the original on September 9, 2018. Retrieved October 9, 2013.
- ^ Dolak, Kevin (November 21, 2013). "Gun Debate Spurred by Kennedy Assassination Rages on Today". ABC News Internet Ventures. Retrieved July 7, 2014.
- ^ "U.S. gun control: A history of tragedy, legislative action". CBS Interactive. April 13, 2013. Retrieved July 7, 2014.
- ^ Zimring, Franklin E. (1975). "Firearms and Federal Law: The Gun Control Act of 1968". The Journal of Legal Studies. 4 (1): 133–198. doi:10.1086/467528. ISSN 0047-2530. JSTOR 724104.
- ^ https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-82/pdf/STATUTE-82-Pg1213-2.pdf
- ^ 18 U.S.C. 922 (d)
- ^ a b Martin, Nina (June 21, 2024). "Supreme Court Upholds Law Disarming Domestic Abusers". Mother Jones. Retrieved June 21, 2024.
- ^ 18 U.S.C. 921 (a)(33)(B).
- ^ "Civil Disabilities of Convicted Felons: A State-by-State Survey" (PDF). Department of Justice. October 1996.
- ^ Herbert, Arthur (September 26, 2011). "Open Letter to All Federal Firearms Licensees" (PDF). atf.gov. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 16, 2013.
- ^ "18 U.S. Code § 922 – Unlawful acts". law.cornell.edu. Legal Information Institute (LII).
- ^ "Federal Firearms Regulations Reference Guide 2005" (PDF). 2005. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 31, 2009.
- ^ "Defining the type of weapon under review, The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-09-20. Retrieved 2007-05-10.
- ^ "Department of the Treasury Study on the Sporting Suitability of Modified Semiautomatic Assault Rifles" (PDF). atf.gov. April 1998.
- ^ Knox, Neal (2009) [1966]. "The Dodd Bill Both Fact ... and Fantasy". In Knox, Chris (ed.). The Gun Rights War: Dispatches from the Front Lines. MacFarlane. ISBN 9780976863304.
- ^ Waldman, Michael (2014). The Second Amendment: A Biography. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-1-4767-4746-0.
- ^ Achenbach, Joel; Higham, Scott; Horwitz, Sari (12 January 2013). "How NRA's true believers converted a marksmanship group into a mighty gun lobby". The Washington Post. Retrieved 6 July 2014.
- ^ Knox, Neal (2009) [1993]. "JPFO Proves Me Wrong". In Knox, Chris (ed.). The Gun Rights War: Dispatches from the Front Lines. MacFarlane. ISBN 9780976863304. OCLC 423586835.
- ^ Winkler, Adam (2011). Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear Arms in America. Norton. ISBN 9780393077414.
- ^ a b Norell, James O. E. (2011). "Passing of a Legend". nrapublications.org. National Rifle Association. Archived from the original on May 6, 2012. Retrieved July 5, 2014.
- ^ a b Spitzer, Robert J. (2011). "Gun Control: Constitutional Mandate or Myth?". In Tatalovich, Raymond; Daynes, Byron W. (eds.). Moral Controversies in American Politics. M.E. Sharpe. p. 175. ISBN 9780765627452.
- ^ Spitzer, Robert J. (2011). "Gun Control: Constitutional Mandate or Myth?". In Tatalovich, Raymond; Daynes, Byron W. (eds.). Moral Controversies in American Politics. M.E. Sharpe. p. 176. ISBN 9780765627452.
Further reading
[edit]- Zimring, Frank (1968). "Is Gun Control Likely to Reduce Violent Killings?". The University of Chicago Law Review. 35 (4): 721–737. doi:10.2307/1598883. JSTOR 1598883. OCLC 65016157.[permanent dead link ]
- Hahn, Robert A.; Bilukha, Oleg; Crosby, Alex; Fullilove, Mindy T.; Liberman, Akiva; Moscicki, Eve; Snyder, Susan; Tuma, Farris; et al. (2005). "Firearms laws and the reduction of violence" (PDF). American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 28 (2): 40–71. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.005. PMID 15698747. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-03-31. Retrieved 2012-10-30.
External links
[edit]- As codified in 18 U.S.C. chapter 44 of the United States Code from LII
- As codified in 18 U.S.C. chapter 44 of the United States Code from the US House of Representatives
- Gun Control Act of 1968 as enacted (details) in the US Statutes at Large
- H.R. 17735 on GovTrack