Jump to content

Staying On: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m added imdb link for adaptation
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Added date. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Spinixster | Category:Novels set in India | #UCB_Category 41/197
 
(25 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|1977 book by Paul Scott}}
{{EngvarB|date=September 2017}}
{{EngvarB|date=September 2017}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2017}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2017}}
{{Infobox book
{{unreferenced|date=January 2013}}
{{Infobox book
| name = Staying On
| name = Staying On
| title_orig =
| title_orig =
Line 10: Line 10:
| author = [[Paul Mark Scott|Paul Scott]]
| author = [[Paul Mark Scott|Paul Scott]]
| illustrator =
| illustrator =
| isbn =9780226743493
| cover_artist =
| cover_artist =
| country =
| country =
Line 15: Line 16:
| subject =
| subject =
| genre =
| genre =
| publisher = [[Heinemann (publisher)|Heinemann]]
| publisher = [[University of Chicago Press]]
| release_date = 1977
| release_date = 1977
| english_release_date =
| english_release_date =
Line 24: Line 25:
}}
}}


'''''Staying On''''' is a novel by [[Paul Mark Scott|Paul Scott]], which was published in 1977 and won the [[Booker Prize]].
'''''Staying On''''' is a novel by [[Paul Mark Scott|Paul Scott]] which was published by [[University of Chicago Press]] in 1977. It was the recipient of the 1977 [[Booker prize]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://thebookerprizes.com/the-booker-library/prize-years/1977 |title=The Booker Prize 1977 |website=thebookerprizes.com |access-date=2024-02-06 |archive-date=23 March 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240323212638/https://thebookerprizes.com/the-booker-library/prize-years/1977 |url-status=live }}</ref>

==Background==
[[Paul Scott (novelist)|Paul Scott]] started writing his novel which was concluded and published in 1977. The book was the winner of the 1977 [[Booker prize]], although the writer was suffering from cancer; and may be limited to six months living. Paul was unable to attend the prize ceremony.

According to the British Newspaper ''[[The Guardian]]'', "Scott probably didn't know he was dying when he wrote ''"Staying On"'', and it does little good to speculate on whether intimations of mortality influenced him."<ref>{{cite web |last=Jordison |first=Sam |url=https://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2008/dec/19/booker-india |title=Booker club: Staying On |website=[[The Guardian]] |date=22 December 2008 |access-date=28 March 2024 |archive-date=25 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230125104314/https://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2008/dec/19/booker-india |url-status=live }}</ref>


==Plot summary==
==Plot summary==
''Staying On'' focuses on Tusker and Lucy Smalley, who are briefly mentioned in the latter two books of the [[Raj Quartet]], ''[[The Towers of Silence]]'' and ''[[A Division of the Spoils]]'', and are the last British couple living in the small hill town of Pankot after [[Partition of India|Indian independence]]. Tusker had risen to the rank of [[colonel]] in the [[British Indian Army]], but on his retirement had entered the world of commerce as a 'box wallah', and the couple had moved elsewhere in India. However, they had returned to Pankot to take up residence in the Lodge, an annexe to Smith's Hotel. This, formerly the town's principal hotel, was now symbolically overshadowed by the brash new Shiraz Hotel, erected by a [[consortium]] of Indian businessmen from the nearby city of Ranpur.
''Staying On'' focuses on Tusker and Lucy Smalley, who were briefly mentioned in the latter two books of the [[Raj Quartet]], ''[[The Towers of Silence]]'' and ''[[A Division of the Spoils]]''. They were the last British couple who lived in the small hill town of [[Pankot]] (after the [[Partition of India|Indian independence]]).


Tusker was a [[colonel]], a high rank in the [[British Indian Army]]. On his retirement, he had entered "the world of commerce" as a 'box wallah', and the couple had moved elsewhere in [[India]]. However, they had returned to Pankot to take up residence in the Lodge, an annexe to Smith's Hotel. This, formerly the town's principal hotel, was now symbolically overshadowed by the brash new Shiraz Hotel, erected by a [[consortium]] of Indian businessmen from the nearby city of Ranpur.
We learn about life as an [[expatriate|expat]] in Pankot principally by listening to Lucy's ponderings, for it is she who is the loquacious one, in contrast to Tusker's pathological reticence. He talks in clipped verbless [[telegraphese]], often limiting his utterances to a single "Ha!". He has been purposeless since being obliged to retire, and it is left to Lucy to make sense of the world herself. It is a sad story of frustration that she recounts to herself. She remembers how the young Captain Smalley came back to London on leave in 1930, visited his bank, where she, a vicar's daughter, worked, and tentatively asked her out. She was swept off her feet by the thought of marrying an army officer and dreamt of a glamorous wedding with his fellow officers making an arch with their swords, but life turned out very differently. His job was dull administration, and his early attentiveness in bed rapidly waned. He prohibited her from fulfilling herself by taking part in amateur dramatics. Not only this, but she ranked fairly low in the social [[pecking order]] among the white women in Pankot and suffered numerous indignities. A symbol of this retrospection is that their preferred conveyance is the [[Tanga (carriage)|Tonga]], a horse-drawn carriage in which they choose to sit facing backwards, "looking back at what we're leaving behind".


Life was treated as [[expatriate|expat]] in Pankot, principally by listening to Lucy's ponderings, for it is she who is the loquacious one, in contrast to Tusker's pathological reticence. He talks in clipped verbless [[telegraphese]], often limiting his utterances to a single "Ha!". He has been purposeless since being obliged to retire, and it is left to Lucy to make sense of the world herself. It is a sad story of frustration that she recounts to herself. She remembers how the young Captain Smalley came back to London on leave in 1930, visited his bank, where she, a vicar's daughter, worked, and tentatively asked her out. She was swept off her feet by the thought of marrying an army officer and dreamt of a glamorous wedding with his fellow officers making an arch with their swords, but life turned out very differently. His job was dull administration, and his early attentiveness in bed rapidly waned. He prohibited her from fulfilling herself by taking part in amateur dramatics. Not only this, but she ranked fairly low in the social [[pecking order]] among the white women in Pankot and suffered numerous indignities. A symbol of this retrospection is that their preferred conveyance is the [[Tanga (carriage)|tonga]], a horse-drawn carriage in which they choose to sit facing backward, "looking back at what we're leaving behind".
It falls to Lucy to navigate a path between her husband's obstinacy and obtuseness and the increasingly pressing demands of India's slow transition to [[modernity]]. The question of who pays the gardener, for example, requires the skilful management of human relationships. She also tries to maintain some continuity in her life, through correspondence with her old acquaintances (characters in the [[Raj Quartet]]), such as Sarah Layton (now Sarah Perron), who have moved back to England. It is through a letter from Sarah Perron that romantic fans of the [[Raj Quartet]] learn that she did indeed meet Guy again, and they are living happily ever after with their two boys, Lance and Perceval.

It falls to Lucy to navigate a path between her husband's obstinacy and obtuseness and the increasingly pressing demands of India's slow transition to [[modernity]]. The question of who pays the gardener, for example, requires the skilful management of human relationships. She also tries to maintain some continuity in her life, through correspondence with her old acquaintances (characters in the [[Raj Quartet]]), such as Sarah Layton (now Sarah Perron), who have moved back to England. It is through a letter from Sarah Perron that romantic fans of the [[Raj Quartet]] learn that she did indeed meet Guy again, and they are living happily ever after with their two children, Lance and Jane.


It is clear she blames Tusker for insisting on 'staying on'—at one point they could have retired comfortably to England, but he has been reckless ("nothing goes quicker than hundred [[rupee]] notes"), and now she has no idea if they could afford it. She entreats him to tell her how she would stand financially if he were to die. At long last, he writes her a letter, setting out their finances and also remarking that she had been "a good woman" to him. But he also tells her not to ask him about it, as he is incapable of discussing it face to face: "If you do I'll only say something that will hurt you". Nevertheless, she treasures this, the only [[love letter]] she has ever received.
It is clear she blames Tusker for insisting on 'staying on'—at one point they could have retired comfortably to England, but he has been reckless ("nothing goes quicker than hundred [[rupee]] notes"), and now she has no idea if they could afford it. She entreats him to tell her how she would stand financially if he were to die. At long last, he writes her a letter, setting out their finances and also remarking that she had been "a good woman" to him. But he also tells her not to ask him about it, as he is incapable of discussing it face to face: "If you do I'll only say something that will hurt you". Nevertheless, she treasures this, the only [[love letter]] she has ever received.
Line 39: Line 47:
Mrs Bhoolabhoy's greed induces her to trade her ownership of the now shabby Smith's hotel for a share in the competing consortium. She instructs Mr Bhoolabhoy to issue the Smalleys with a notice to quit the Lodge.
Mrs Bhoolabhoy's greed induces her to trade her ownership of the now shabby Smith's hotel for a share in the competing consortium. She instructs Mr Bhoolabhoy to issue the Smalleys with a notice to quit the Lodge.


On receipt of this letter, Tusker flies into an impotent rage and drops dead of a heart attack. Lucy is downcast and puts on a brave face as she prepares for the funeral and a solitary life. But, at last, she would potentially be free to return to England, perhaps able to scrape by on her £1,500 a year. She is a survivor, because she can adapt, as is shown by the fact that, on the day of Tusker's death, she was about to break a previously upheld [[taboo]] and welcome her hairdresser, Susy, who is of mixed race, to dinner. In her imagination, she asks Tusker one last thing – to take her with him, for if she had been a good woman to him, as he wrote, why has he now gone home without her?
On receipt of this letter, Tusker flies into an impotent rage and drops dead of a heart attack. Lucy is downcast and puts on a brave face as she prepares for the funeral and a solitary life. But, at last, she would potentially be free to return to England, perhaps able to scrape by on her £1,500 a year. She is a survivor, because she can adapt, as is shown by the fact that, on the day of Tusker's death, she was about to break a previously upheld [[taboo]] and welcome her hairdresser, Susy, who is of mixed race, to dinner. In her imagination, she asks Tusker one last thing&nbsp;– to take her with him, for if she had been a good woman, as he wrote, why has he gone home without her?


==Title==
==Reception==
''Staying On'' was internationally accepted and was received with positive reviews, having won the Booker Prize in 1977. It is often regarded as a delightful conclusion to Scott's [[Raj Quartet]] series, offering a unique and engrossing portrait of the end of an empire and a forty-year love affair.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://bookertalk.com/review-staying-on-paul-scott/|title=Staying On by Paul Scott: Delightful End to Raj Quartet|website=Book Talker|date=30 July 2020 |access-date=29 March 2024|archive-date=26 September 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230926120547/https://bookertalk.com/review-staying-on-paul-scott/|url-status=live}}</ref>
"Staying On" was an expression used by British expatriates in India during the latter stages of the Raj. It related to the minority of British officials, military officers and commercial traders who chose to remain in India after spending their working lives there. The more common practice was to retire on pension to Britain.

The novel is set in the small hill town of [[Pankot]], [[India]], and follows Tusker and Lucy Smalley, a British couple who chose to remain in India after independence. Their story is one of adjustment to a new life post-Empire, and has been praised as "a confront to the realities of a changing society and their own relationship." Critics have praised the book for its deep character study and its exploration of themes such as loyalty, love, and the legacy of colonialism.


==Adaptations==
==Adaptations==
In 1980, it was turned into a television film by [[Granada TV]], starring [[Trevor Howard]] and [[Celia Johnson]], famously the stars, thirty-five years before, of ''[[Brief Encounter]]''. This paved the way for [[The Jewel in the Crown (TV series)|the television treatment]] of ''[[The Jewel in the Crown (novel)|The Jewel in the Crown]]'', based on Scott's [[Raj Quartet]], to which it is in fact a coda.
In 1980, the book was turned into a television film of same title produced by [[Granada TV]] and starrs [[Trevor Howard]] and [[Celia Johnson]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.screenonline.org.uk/tv/id/501586/index.html |title=Staying On (1980) |first=Naman |last=Ramachandran |work=[[Screenonline]] |access-date=6 February 2024 |archive-date=6 February 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240206212819/http://www.screenonline.org.uk/tv/id/501586/index.html |url-status=live }}</ref> The book was the main influence of the television series ''[[The Jewel in the Crown (TV series)]]'' and a book of ''[[The Jewel in the Crown (novel)|same name]]''. It was based on Paul Scott's [[Raj Quartet]].

==References==
{{reflist}}


==External links==
==External links==
Line 51: Line 64:


{{Raj Quartet}}
{{Raj Quartet}}
{{Man Booker Prize}}
{{Booker Prize}}

[[Category:Booker Prize-winning works]]
[[Category:Booker Prize–winning works]]
[[Category:1977 British novels]]
[[Category:1977 British novels]]
[[Category:Novels by Paul Scott]]
[[Category:Novels by Paul Scott]]
Line 58: Line 72:
[[Category:Heinemann (publisher) books]]
[[Category:Heinemann (publisher) books]]
[[Category:British novels adapted into films]]
[[Category:British novels adapted into films]]
[[Category:Novels adapted into television programs]]
[[Category:British novels adapted into television shows]]

Latest revision as of 08:26, 18 November 2024

Staying On
First edition
AuthorPaul Scott
LanguageEnglish
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press
Publication date
1977
Pages258 pp (paperback)
ISBN9780226743493
Preceded byA Division of the Spoils (1974) 

Staying On is a novel by Paul Scott which was published by University of Chicago Press in 1977. It was the recipient of the 1977 Booker prize.[1]

Background

[edit]

Paul Scott started writing his novel which was concluded and published in 1977. The book was the winner of the 1977 Booker prize, although the writer was suffering from cancer; and may be limited to six months living. Paul was unable to attend the prize ceremony.

According to the British Newspaper The Guardian, "Scott probably didn't know he was dying when he wrote "Staying On", and it does little good to speculate on whether intimations of mortality influenced him."[2]

Plot summary

[edit]

Staying On focuses on Tusker and Lucy Smalley, who were briefly mentioned in the latter two books of the Raj Quartet, The Towers of Silence and A Division of the Spoils. They were the last British couple who lived in the small hill town of Pankot (after the Indian independence).

Tusker was a colonel, a high rank in the British Indian Army. On his retirement, he had entered "the world of commerce" as a 'box wallah', and the couple had moved elsewhere in India. However, they had returned to Pankot to take up residence in the Lodge, an annexe to Smith's Hotel. This, formerly the town's principal hotel, was now symbolically overshadowed by the brash new Shiraz Hotel, erected by a consortium of Indian businessmen from the nearby city of Ranpur.

Life was treated as expat in Pankot, principally by listening to Lucy's ponderings, for it is she who is the loquacious one, in contrast to Tusker's pathological reticence. He talks in clipped verbless telegraphese, often limiting his utterances to a single "Ha!". He has been purposeless since being obliged to retire, and it is left to Lucy to make sense of the world herself. It is a sad story of frustration that she recounts to herself. She remembers how the young Captain Smalley came back to London on leave in 1930, visited his bank, where she, a vicar's daughter, worked, and tentatively asked her out. She was swept off her feet by the thought of marrying an army officer and dreamt of a glamorous wedding with his fellow officers making an arch with their swords, but life turned out very differently. His job was dull administration, and his early attentiveness in bed rapidly waned. He prohibited her from fulfilling herself by taking part in amateur dramatics. Not only this, but she ranked fairly low in the social pecking order among the white women in Pankot and suffered numerous indignities. A symbol of this retrospection is that their preferred conveyance is the tonga, a horse-drawn carriage in which they choose to sit facing backward, "looking back at what we're leaving behind".

It falls to Lucy to navigate a path between her husband's obstinacy and obtuseness and the increasingly pressing demands of India's slow transition to modernity. The question of who pays the gardener, for example, requires the skilful management of human relationships. She also tries to maintain some continuity in her life, through correspondence with her old acquaintances (characters in the Raj Quartet), such as Sarah Layton (now Sarah Perron), who have moved back to England. It is through a letter from Sarah Perron that romantic fans of the Raj Quartet learn that she did indeed meet Guy again, and they are living happily ever after with their two children, Lance and Jane.

It is clear she blames Tusker for insisting on 'staying on'—at one point they could have retired comfortably to England, but he has been reckless ("nothing goes quicker than hundred rupee notes"), and now she has no idea if they could afford it. She entreats him to tell her how she would stand financially if he were to die. At long last, he writes her a letter, setting out their finances and also remarking that she had been "a good woman" to him. But he also tells her not to ask him about it, as he is incapable of discussing it face to face: "If you do I'll only say something that will hurt you". Nevertheless, she treasures this, the only love letter she has ever received.

Meanwhile, we see the new India that is replacing the British Raj, symbolised by Mrs Lila Bhoolabhoy, the temperamental and overweight owner of Smith's Hotel, and her much put upon husband and hotel manager, who is Tusker's drinking companion. The richly humorous context includes the engagement of servants, the railway service, poached eggs, hairdressing and the church organ. There is an intimate relationship between the Smalleys' servant Ibrahim and Mrs Bhoolabhoy's maid Minnie.

Mrs Bhoolabhoy's greed induces her to trade her ownership of the now shabby Smith's hotel for a share in the competing consortium. She instructs Mr Bhoolabhoy to issue the Smalleys with a notice to quit the Lodge.

On receipt of this letter, Tusker flies into an impotent rage and drops dead of a heart attack. Lucy is downcast and puts on a brave face as she prepares for the funeral and a solitary life. But, at last, she would potentially be free to return to England, perhaps able to scrape by on her £1,500 a year. She is a survivor, because she can adapt, as is shown by the fact that, on the day of Tusker's death, she was about to break a previously upheld taboo and welcome her hairdresser, Susy, who is of mixed race, to dinner. In her imagination, she asks Tusker one last thing – to take her with him, for if she had been a good woman, as he wrote, why has he gone home without her?

Reception

[edit]

Staying On was internationally accepted and was received with positive reviews, having won the Booker Prize in 1977. It is often regarded as a delightful conclusion to Scott's Raj Quartet series, offering a unique and engrossing portrait of the end of an empire and a forty-year love affair.[3]

The novel is set in the small hill town of Pankot, India, and follows Tusker and Lucy Smalley, a British couple who chose to remain in India after independence. Their story is one of adjustment to a new life post-Empire, and has been praised as "a confront to the realities of a changing society and their own relationship." Critics have praised the book for its deep character study and its exploration of themes such as loyalty, love, and the legacy of colonialism.

Adaptations

[edit]

In 1980, the book was turned into a television film of same title produced by Granada TV and starrs Trevor Howard and Celia Johnson.[4] The book was the main influence of the television series The Jewel in the Crown (TV series) and a book of same name. It was based on Paul Scott's Raj Quartet.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "The Booker Prize 1977". thebookerprizes.com. Archived from the original on 23 March 2024. Retrieved 6 February 2024.
  2. ^ Jordison, Sam (22 December 2008). "Booker club: Staying On". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 25 January 2023. Retrieved 28 March 2024.
  3. ^ "Staying On by Paul Scott: Delightful End to Raj Quartet". Book Talker. 30 July 2020. Archived from the original on 26 September 2023. Retrieved 29 March 2024.
  4. ^ Ramachandran, Naman. "Staying On (1980)". Screenonline. Archived from the original on 6 February 2024. Retrieved 6 February 2024.
[edit]