Tricritical point: Difference between revisions
degrees of Freedom |
Howtonotwin (talk | contribs) m grammar in leadin |
||
(15 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In [[condensed matter physics]], dealing with the macroscopic physical properties of matter, a '''tricritical point''' is a point in the [[phase diagram]] of a system at which [[ |
A '''tricritical point''' is a point where a second order [[phase transition]] curve meets a first order phase transition curve. The notion was first introduced by [[Lev Landau]] in 1937, who referred to the tricritical point as the critical point of the continuous transition.<ref>Landau, L. D. (1937). On the theory of phase transitions. I. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 11, 19.</ref><ref>Landau, L. D., & Lifshitz, E. M. (2013). Statistical Physics: Volume 5 (Vol. 5). Elsevier.</ref> The first example of a tricritical point was shown by [[Robert Griffiths (physicist)|Robert B. Griffiths]] in a helium-3 helium-4 mixture.<ref>Griffiths, R. B. (1970). Thermodynamics near the two-fluid critical mixing point in He 3-He 4. Physical Review Letters, 24(13), 715.</ref> In [[condensed matter physics]], dealing with the macroscopic physical properties of matter, a '''tricritical point''' is a point in the [[phase diagram]] of a system at which [[phase equilibrium|three-phase coexistence]] terminates.<ref>B. Widom, ''Theory of Phase Equilibrium'', J. Phys. Chem. '''1996''', 100, 13190-13199</ref> This definition is clearly parallel to the definition of an ordinary [[critical point (thermodynamics)|critical point]] as the point at which two-phase coexistence terminates. |
||
A point of three-phase coexistence is termed a [[triple point]] for a one-component system, since, from [[Gibbs' phase rule]], this condition is only achieved for a single point in the phase diagram (''F'' = 2-3+1 ='''0'''). For tricritical points to be observed, one needs a mixture with more components. It can be shown<ref>''ibid''.</ref> that three is the ''minimum'' number of components for which these points can appear. In this case, one may have a two-dimensional region of three-phase coexistence (''F'' = 2-3+3 ='''2''') (thus, each point in this region corresponds to a triple point). This region |
A point of three-phase coexistence is termed a [[triple point]] for a one-component system, since, from [[Gibbs' phase rule]], this condition is only achieved for a single point in the phase diagram (''F'' = 2-3+1 ='''0'''). For tricritical points to be observed, one needs a mixture with more components. It can be shown<ref>''ibid''.</ref> that three is the ''minimum'' number of components for which these points can appear. In this case, one may have a two-dimensional region of three-phase coexistence (''F'' = 2-3+3 ='''2''') (thus, each point in this region corresponds to a triple point). This region will terminate in two critical lines of two-phase coexistence; these two critical lines may then terminate at a single tricritical point. This point is therefore "twice critical", since it belongs to two critical branches.<br> |
||
Indeed, its [[critical behavior]] is different from that of a conventional critical point: the upper [[critical dimension]] is lowered from d=4 to d=3 so the [[Landau theory|classical exponents]] turn out to apply for real systems in three dimensions (but not for systems whose spatial dimension is 2 or lower). |
Indeed, its [[critical behavior]] is different from that of a conventional critical point: the upper [[critical dimension]] is lowered from d=4 to d=3 so the [[Landau theory|classical exponents]] turn out to apply for real systems in three dimensions (but not for systems whose spatial dimension is 2 or lower). |
||
== Solid state == |
|||
It seems more convenient<ref> |
It seems more convenient experimentally<ref> |
||
{{cite journal |
{{cite journal |
||
| title = Existence of a tricritical point in the antiferromagnet KFe<sub>3</sub>(OH)<sub>6</sub>(SO4)<sub>2</sub> on a kagome lattice |
| title = Existence of a tricritical point in the antiferromagnet KFe<sub>3</sub>(OH)<sub>6</sub>(SO4)<sub>2</sub> on a [[kagome lattice]] |
||
|author1=A. S. Freitas |author2=Douglas F. de Albuquerque |
|author1=A. S. Freitas |author2=Douglas F. de Albuquerque |
||
| |
|name-list-style=amp | journal = Phys. Rev. E |
||
| volume = 91 |
| volume = 91 |
||
|issue=1 | pages = 012117 |
|issue=1 | pages = 012117 |
||
Line 14: | Line 15: | ||
| doi = 10.1103/PhysRevE.91.012117 |
| doi = 10.1103/PhysRevE.91.012117 |
||
|pmid=25679580 |bibcode = 2015PhRvE..91a2117F }} |
|pmid=25679580 |bibcode = 2015PhRvE..91a2117F }} |
||
</ref> |
</ref> to consider mixtures with four components for which one thermodynamic variable (usually the pressure or the volume) is kept fixed. The situation then reduces to the one described for mixtures of three components. |
||
Historically, it was for a long time unclear whether a superconductor undergoes a first- or a second-order phase transition. The question was finally settled in 1982.<ref> |
Historically, it was for a long time unclear whether a [[superconduction|superconductor]] undergoes a first- or a second-order phase transition. The question was finally settled in 1982.<ref> |
||
{{cite journal |
{{cite journal |
||
| title = Disorder Version of the Abelian Higgs Model and the Order of the Superconductive Phase Transition |
| title = Disorder Version of the Abelian Higgs Model and the Order of the Superconductive Phase Transition |
||
Line 26: | Line 27: | ||
| year = 1982 |
| year = 1982 |
||
| doi = 10.1007/BF02754760 |
| doi = 10.1007/BF02754760 |
||
| s2cid = 121012850 |
|||
| url = |
| url = http://users.physik.fu-berlin.de/~kleinert/97/97.pdf}} |
||
</ref> If the Ginzburg-Landau parameter <math>\kappa</math> that distinguishes [[Type I superconductor|type-I]] and |
|||
[[Type II superconductor|type-II]] superconductors (see also [[Ginzburg–Landau theory|here]]) is large enough, vortex fluctuations become important |
</ref> If the Ginzburg–Landau parameter <math>\kappa</math> that distinguishes [[Type I superconductor|type-I]] and [[Type II superconductor|type-II]] superconductors (see also [[Ginzburg–Landau theory|here]]) is large enough, vortex fluctuations become important which drive the transition to ''second'' order.<ref> |
||
which drive the transition to second order .<ref> |
|||
{{cite journal |
{{cite journal |
||
| title = Vortex Origin of Tricritical Point in Ginzburg-Landau Theory |
| title = Vortex Origin of Tricritical Point in Ginzburg-Landau Theory |
||
| author = [[Hagen Kleinert|H. Kleinert]] |
| author = [[Hagen Kleinert|H. Kleinert]] |
||
| journal = |
| journal = Europhys. Lett. |
||
| volume = 74 |
| volume = 74 |
||
| issue = 5 |
| issue = 5 |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
| year = 2006 |
| year = 2006 |
||
| doi = 10.1209/epl/i2006-10029-5 |
| doi = 10.1209/epl/i2006-10029-5 |
||
| url = |
| url = http://users.physik.fu-berlin.de/~kleinert/360/360.pdf|arxiv = cond-mat/0509430 |bibcode = 2006EL.....74..889K | s2cid = 55633766 |
||
}} |
|||
</ref> |
</ref> |
||
The tricritical point lies at roughly <math>\kappa=0.76/\sqrt{2}</math> |
The tricritical point lies at roughly <math>\kappa=0.76/\sqrt{2}</math>, slightly below the value <math>\kappa=1/\sqrt{2}</math> where type-I goes over into type-II superconductor. The prediction was confirmed in 2002 by Monte Carlo [[Monte Carlo method|computer simulations]].<ref> |
||
where [[Type I superconductor|type-I]] goes over into [[Type II superconductor|type-II]] superconductor. The prediction was confirmed in 2002 by [[Computer simulation|Monte Carlo computer simulations]].<ref> |
|||
{{cite journal |
{{cite journal |
||
| title = Vortex interactions and thermally induced crossover from type-I to type-II superconductivity |
| title = Vortex interactions and thermally induced crossover from type-I to type-II superconductivity |
||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
| year = 2002 |
| year = 2002 |
||
| doi = 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.064524 |
| doi = 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.064524 |
||
| url = |
| url = http://users.physik.fu-berlin.de/~kleinert/papers/sudbotre064524.pdf |
||
| bibcode=2002PhRvB..66f4524H|arxiv = cond-mat/0202215 }} |
| bibcode=2002PhRvB..66f4524H|arxiv = cond-mat/0202215 |s2cid=13672575 }} |
||
</ref> |
</ref> |
||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
[[Category:Phase transitions]] |
[[Category:Phase transitions]] |
||
[[Category:Critical phenomena]] |
[[Category:Critical phenomena]] |
||
{{CMP-stub}} |
|||
[[Category:Condensed matter physics]] |
Latest revision as of 17:53, 18 November 2024
A tricritical point is a point where a second order phase transition curve meets a first order phase transition curve. The notion was first introduced by Lev Landau in 1937, who referred to the tricritical point as the critical point of the continuous transition.[1][2] The first example of a tricritical point was shown by Robert B. Griffiths in a helium-3 helium-4 mixture.[3] In condensed matter physics, dealing with the macroscopic physical properties of matter, a tricritical point is a point in the phase diagram of a system at which three-phase coexistence terminates.[4] This definition is clearly parallel to the definition of an ordinary critical point as the point at which two-phase coexistence terminates.
A point of three-phase coexistence is termed a triple point for a one-component system, since, from Gibbs' phase rule, this condition is only achieved for a single point in the phase diagram (F = 2-3+1 =0). For tricritical points to be observed, one needs a mixture with more components. It can be shown[5] that three is the minimum number of components for which these points can appear. In this case, one may have a two-dimensional region of three-phase coexistence (F = 2-3+3 =2) (thus, each point in this region corresponds to a triple point). This region will terminate in two critical lines of two-phase coexistence; these two critical lines may then terminate at a single tricritical point. This point is therefore "twice critical", since it belongs to two critical branches.
Indeed, its critical behavior is different from that of a conventional critical point: the upper critical dimension is lowered from d=4 to d=3 so the classical exponents turn out to apply for real systems in three dimensions (but not for systems whose spatial dimension is 2 or lower).
Solid state
[edit]It seems more convenient experimentally[6] to consider mixtures with four components for which one thermodynamic variable (usually the pressure or the volume) is kept fixed. The situation then reduces to the one described for mixtures of three components.
Historically, it was for a long time unclear whether a superconductor undergoes a first- or a second-order phase transition. The question was finally settled in 1982.[7] If the Ginzburg–Landau parameter that distinguishes type-I and type-II superconductors (see also here) is large enough, vortex fluctuations become important which drive the transition to second order.[8] The tricritical point lies at roughly , slightly below the value where type-I goes over into type-II superconductor. The prediction was confirmed in 2002 by Monte Carlo computer simulations.[9]
References
[edit]- ^ Landau, L. D. (1937). On the theory of phase transitions. I. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 11, 19.
- ^ Landau, L. D., & Lifshitz, E. M. (2013). Statistical Physics: Volume 5 (Vol. 5). Elsevier.
- ^ Griffiths, R. B. (1970). Thermodynamics near the two-fluid critical mixing point in He 3-He 4. Physical Review Letters, 24(13), 715.
- ^ B. Widom, Theory of Phase Equilibrium, J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 13190-13199
- ^ ibid.
- ^ A. S. Freitas & Douglas F. de Albuquerque (2015). "Existence of a tricritical point in the antiferromagnet KFe3(OH)6(SO4)2 on a kagome lattice". Phys. Rev. E. 91 (1): 012117. Bibcode:2015PhRvE..91a2117F. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.91.012117. PMID 25679580.
- ^ H. Kleinert (1982). "Disorder Version of the Abelian Higgs Model and the Order of the Superconductive Phase Transition" (PDF). Lettere al Nuovo Cimento. 35 (13): 405–412. doi:10.1007/BF02754760. S2CID 121012850.
- ^ H. Kleinert (2006). "Vortex Origin of Tricritical Point in Ginzburg-Landau Theory" (PDF). Europhys. Lett. 74 (5): 889–895. arXiv:cond-mat/0509430. Bibcode:2006EL.....74..889K. doi:10.1209/epl/i2006-10029-5. S2CID 55633766.
- ^ J. Hove; S. Mo; A. Sudbo (2002). "Vortex interactions and thermally induced crossover from type-I to type-II superconductivity" (PDF). Phys. Rev. B 66 (6): 064524. arXiv:cond-mat/0202215. Bibcode:2002PhRvB..66f4524H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.66.064524. S2CID 13672575.