User talk:Omegatron: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 00:04, 19 November 2024

Wikipedia:Babel

en

This user is a native speaker of the English language.

fr-1

Cet utilisateur peut contribuer avec un niveau élémentaire de français.

Search user languages

Archives

This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot.

Any sections older than 30 days will be automatically moved to this month's archive. Other months can be accessed from my list of archives.

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by .

Redirects

On your user/talk pages on enWS, the redirects don't work because of the parentheses, you have to remove them for it to work. — Alien333 (what I did & why I did it wrong) 12:18, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Editor experience invitation

Hi Omegatron. I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 03:26, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Nomination of Social_utility_efficiency for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Social_utility_efficiency, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social utility efficiency until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Affinepplan, why not spend your time creating content instead of destroying it? 😑 — Omegatron (talk) 15:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

please see WP:Content removal

the deletion of unsourced, inaccurate, POV, or in this case irrelevant content is a productive contribution to Wikipedia just as creation is. Affinepplan (talk) 15:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How are concepts from social choice theory not relevant to include in an encyclopedia? — Omegatron (talk) 16:07, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

please read WP:Notability. the only reliable source discussing this metric in detail is a single publication by the progenitor from several decades ago. Affinepplan (talk) 16:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's obviously not true; there are numerous references in academic literature. What's your motivation for trying to delete this? — Omegatron (talk) 03:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

> there are numerous references in academic literature

there are not. Affinepplan (talk) 04:00, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes there are plenty for notability; I've added a list to the AfD. Why are you trying to delete this? — Omegatron (talk) 00:14, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

please see my response to that list.

> Why are you trying to delete this?

because it fails WP:Notability Affinepplan (talk) 00:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-<div style="padding:5px; margin-bottom:10px; border:1px solid #c0c090; background-color:#FEC; text-align: center"> [[Image:Emblem-important.svg|40px|left]] [[Image:Emblem-important.svg|40px|right]]  '''Attention:''' As of [[2008-06-08]], Omegatron is no longer active on Wikipedia.
-<p>
-If you need me for something, [[Special:EmailUser/Omegatron|contact me by e-mail]].</p></div>
 {{Babel|en|fr-1}}
@@ Line 13: / Line 9: @@
 }}
+== Redirects ==
-== DS alert American politics ==
+On your user/talk pages on enWS, the redirects don't work because of the parentheses, you have to remove them for it to work. — [[User:Alien333|Alien333]] ([[Special:Contributions/Alien333|what I did]] &amp; [[User_talk:Alien333|why I did it wrong]]) 12:18, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
-{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia.  It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.''
+== Editor experience invitation  ==
-'''Please carefully read this information:'''
+Hi Omegatron. I'm looking for experienced editors to interview [[User:Clovermoss/Editor reflections|here]]. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. [[User:Clovermoss|<span style="color:darkorchid">Clovermoss</span><span style="color:green">🍀</span>]] [[User talk:Clovermoss|(talk)]] 03:26, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
-The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2|here]].
+== Invitation to participate in a research ==
-Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics.  This means [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
-}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:NewsAndEventsGuy|NewsAndEventsGuy]] ([[User talk:NewsAndEventsGuy|talk]]) 09:44, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
+Hello,
-: Why are you posting this on my talk page?  Do you want me to impose sanctions on someone? — [[User:Omegatron|Omegatron]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Omegatron|talk]]) 13:02, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
-::If you read the links in the template, they will answer your question, but the specific part is [[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Discretionary_sanctions#Alerts|here]].  Note the bit about these alerts being purely informational.   The information itself is important, however, so please read the rest too, if you plan to continue work on post 1932 US politics (for reasons that are explained in the links in the template). [[User:NewsAndEventsGuy|NewsAndEventsGuy]] ([[User talk:NewsAndEventsGuy|talk]]) 20:59, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
+The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this '''[https://wikimediafoundation.limesurvey.net/294789?lang=en anonymous survey]'''.
+You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
-::: But why are you posting this on my talk page?  I'm not "working on post 1932 US politics". — [[User:Omegatron|Omegatron]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Omegatron|talk]]) 00:16, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
-:::: [https://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/usersearch.py?name=Omegatron&page=Burlington_mayoral_election%2C_2009&server=enwiki&max= Your edits about the Burlington Vermont election] would appear to fall under that topic.  [[User:NewsAndEventsGuy|NewsAndEventsGuy]] ([[User talk:NewsAndEventsGuy|talk]]) 12:37, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
+The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its [[m:Special:MyLanguage/Research:Wikipedia Administrator Recruitment, Retention, and Attrition|Meta page]] and view its [[wmf:Special:MyLanguage/Legal:Administrator Experiences 2024 Survey Privacy Statement|privacy statement]] .
-::::: Seriously?  So because I wouldn't let you bias an article by blanking criticism of a voting system you like, you're trying to intimidate me with ArbCom sanctions from an unrelated decision?
-::::: Voting systems are [[social choice theory]], which is a branch of economics/math, not politics.  The parties and identities of the candidates are irrelevant.  My edits have nothing to do with partisan politics.  I don't know anything about the candidates other than the number of votes they received. — [[User:Omegatron|Omegatron]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Omegatron|talk]]) 14:24, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
-::::::One element of the DS alert case referenced above is to [[WP:Assume good faith]].  My objections with the disputed article text are laid out, with reference to Wikipedia core polices, at the article talk page. [[User:NewsAndEventsGuy|NewsAndEventsGuy]] ([[User talk:NewsAndEventsGuy|talk]]) 22:48, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
+Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
-== Edit Warring ==
-'''Template notice'''
-[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Burlington mayoral election, 2009]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|BRD]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]].  In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].
+Kind Regards,
-'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period.  Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert.  Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->
+[[mw:Special:MyLanguage/Wikimedia Research|WMF Research Team]]
-'''My Added comments'''
-* Bold edit .... I don't know when two blogs were added to the arcticle
-* [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Burlington_mayoral_election%2C_2009&type=revision&diff=843093574&oldid=843092844 Revert 1] ..... I reverted them as self-published non-RS blogs
-* [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Burlington_mayoral_election,_2009&diff=843096319&oldid=843093574 Non-discussed re-Revert] (Non-AGF Edit summary "revert blanking of references")... The first un-discussed re-revert of this sort is always the first salvo in and edit war
-For reference sources at issue include
-* [https://leastevil.blogspot.com/2009/03/irv-fails-in-its-own-backyard.html leastevil blot]
-* [https://bolson.org/~bolson/2009/20090303_burlington_vt_mayor.html bolson blog]
-However let's not discuss these here.   Article talk of the [[WP:RSN]] would be better venues.
-It's dangerous, by the way, to edit war on an American politics article after recieving the DS alert notice (see prior thread on your talk page)
-[[User:NewsAndEventsGuy|NewsAndEventsGuy]] ([[User talk:NewsAndEventsGuy|talk]]) 01:32, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
-:So the thing to do, would be to self revert, and discuss these blogs either at article talk or the noticeboard.  Meanwhile, thank you for the addition of real RSs.
-[[User:NewsAndEventsGuy|NewsAndEventsGuy]] ([[User talk:NewsAndEventsGuy|talk]]) 01:40, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
+<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[[User:BGerdemann (WMF)|BGerdemann (WMF)]] ([[User talk:BGerdemann (WMF)|talk]]) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
-: Uh, you're the one in the wrong here.  I'm reverting destructive edits to the status quo.  [[Wikipedia:Tendentious editing#One who disputes the reliability of apparently good sources|Stop removing sources just because you disagree with them]].  — [[User:Omegatron|Omegatron]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Omegatron|talk]]) 15:51, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
+<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 -->
-::FYI I have sought input from the Reliable Sources noticeboard in [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Blogs_discussing_Ranked_Choice_Voting|this thread]] via [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AReliable_sources%2FNoticeboard&type=revision&diff=843233838&oldid=843233246 this diff].[[User:NewsAndEventsGuy|NewsAndEventsGuy]] ([[User talk:NewsAndEventsGuy|talk]]) 20:09, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
+== Nomination of [[:Social_utility_efficiency]] for deletion ==
-::: '''O!''' i am friggin' intrigued that you know about this Burlington IRV issue.  being from Burlington, having voted in that election, and having written about IRV vs. Condorcet (and, at one time, being a friend of the candidate who got screwed by IRV), this is an issue close to my heart.  are you involved in the Election Methods mailing list?  (send me an email or facebook, i think you know who i am.)  bestest, [[Special:Contributions/50.47.109.19|50.47.109.19]] ([[User talk:50.47.109.19|talk]]) 01:30, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
+<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article [[:Social_utility_efficiency]], to which you have [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/authorship/en.wikipedia.org/Social_utility_efficiency significantly contributed], is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or if it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].
+The discussion will take place at '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social utility efficiency]]''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
-== ArbCom 2018 election voter message ==
+To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit [[User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier|the configuration page]]. Delivered by ''[[User:SDZeroBot|SDZeroBot]]'' ([[User talk:SDZeroBot|talk]]) 01:01, 5 November 2024 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template -->
-{{Ivmbox|Hello, Omegatron. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2018|2018 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
+: [[User:Affinepplan]], why not spend your time creating content instead of destroying it? 😑 — [[User:Omegatron|Omegatron]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Omegatron|talk]]) 15:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
-The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
+::please see [[WP:Content removal]]
+::the deletion of unsourced, inaccurate, POV, or in this case irrelevant content is a productive contribution to Wikipedia just as creation is. [[User:Affinepplan|Affinepplan]] ([[User talk:Affinepplan|talk]]) 15:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
+::: How are concepts from social choice theory not relevant to include in an encyclopedia? — [[User:Omegatron|Omegatron]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Omegatron|talk]]) 16:07, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
-If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2018/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/710|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
+::::please read [[WP:Notability]]. the only reliable source discussing this metric in detail is a single publication by the progenitor from several decades ago. [[User:Affinepplan|Affinepplan]] ([[User talk:Affinepplan|talk]]) 16:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
-|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
-<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/08&oldid=866998273 -->
+::::: That's obviously not true; there are numerous references in academic literature.  What's your motivation for trying to delete this? — [[User:Omegatron|Omegatron]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Omegatron|talk]]) 03:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
-== hay O!!! ==
+::::::> there are numerous references in academic literature
+::::::there are not. [[User:Affinepplan|Affinepplan]] ([[User talk:Affinepplan|talk]]) 04:00, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
+::::::: Yes there are plenty for notability; I've added a list to the AfD.  Why are you trying to delete this? — [[User:Omegatron|Omegatron]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Omegatron|talk]]) 00:14, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
-i didn't know you were back at Wikipedia.  for some reason i thought you left it.
+::::::::please see my response to that list.
+::::::::>  Why are you trying to delete this?
+::::::::because it fails [[WP:Notability]] [[User:Affinepplan|Affinepplan]] ([[User talk:Affinepplan|talk]]) 00:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
+== Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research ==
-so i took a look at your contribs and see that it got thin around 2010 (with a 10 month gap) and then slowly the frequency of edits increased.
+Hello,
-so welcome from a friend who dares not identify himself lest trouble happens.  i do DSP.  you might remember me.
+I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its [[m:Special:MyLanguage/Research:Wikipedia Administrator Recruitment, Retention, and Attrition|Meta page]] and view its [[wmf:Special:MyLanguage/Legal:Administrator Experiences 2024 Survey Privacy Statement|privacy statement]].
-so greetings from anonymous.
+Take the survey '''[https://wikimediafoundation.limesurvey.net/294789?lang=en here]'''.
-[[Special:Contributions/50.47.109.19|50.47.109.19]] ([[User talk:50.47.109.19|talk]]) 04:41, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
+Kind Regards,
-: Yeah I left, but now I've been contributing again a little, but I'm not as invested as I used to be.  You can see a graph here: https://xtools.wmflabs.org/ec-yearcounts/en.wikipedia.org/Omegatron
-: I suspect I know who you are, and we still interact on other sites/wikis/mailing lists under different usernames.  Not sure if you realize which names are me. :D  — [[User:Omegatron|Omegatron]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Omegatron|talk]]) 00:25, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
+[[mw:Special:MyLanguage/Wikimedia Research|WMF Research Team]]
-:: so O, are you on the dsp stackexchange?  i don't do comp.dsp much anymore. (ASCII math is uglier than <math>\operatorname{LaTeX}</math> math.) [[Special:Contributions/50.47.109.19|50.47.109.19]] ([[User talk:50.47.109.19|talk]]) 01:05, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
+<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[[User:BGerdemann (WMF)|BGerdemann (WMF)]] ([[User talk:BGerdemann (WMF)|talk]]) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
-::: I sent a Facebook message to someone who fits the description. We'll see if you're the same person. :) — [[User:Omegatron|Omegatron]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Omegatron|talk]]) 06:28, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
+<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 -->
-== Merger discussion for [[Path loss]] ==
+== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
+<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
-[[File:Merge-arrows.svg|50px|frameless|left]] An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash;[[Path loss]]&mdash;has been '''proposed for [[Wikipedia:Merging|merging]]''' with another article. If you are interested, please participate in [[Talk:Path loss#Merge|the merger discussion]]. Thank you. [[User:Pierre cb|Pierre cb]] ([[User talk:Pierre cb|talk]]) 14:11, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
+<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div>
+<div class="ivmbox-text">
+Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2024|2024 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
+The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
-== ArbCom 2019 special circular ==
+If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|poll}}|voting page]]'''.  If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
-<div class="notice" style="background:#fff1d2; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height:40px; line-height:130.7%; font-weight: 130.7%;">
-{|
-|valign="top" style="padding: 0.5em 1em 0 0.25em;"| [[File:Warning sign font awesome.svg|40px|center|link=|alt=Icon of a white exclamation mark within a black triangle]]
-|<span style="font-size: 125%;">'''Administrators [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Security|must]] secure their accounts'''</span>
-The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
-* Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email
-* [[Special:ChangePassword|Change your password now]] if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, [https://haveibeenpwned.com/Passwords exposed], or weak
-* [[Wikipedia:User_account_security#Two-factor authentication (2FA)|Enable two-factor authentication now]] for improved security
-|}
-<span style="color:#5871C6;cursor:pointer" class="mw-customtoggle-ArbCom_2019_special_circular">{{clickable button|1=View additional information}}</span>
-</div><div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" id="mw-customcollapsible-ArbCom_2019_special_circular" style="display:none">
-<div style="border-style: dotted; border-color: #886644; border-width: 0 3px 3px 3px; padding: 0 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em;">
-{| style="border-left: 3px solid black; padding-left: 1em;"
-|{{null}}
-; Why have I received this message?
-: All administrators are receiving it.
-; What prompted you to send this message?
-: Recently, several Wikipedia admin accounts were compromised.  The admin accounts were [[WP:LEVEL1|desysopped on an emergency basis]].  In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account.  The committee has updated its guidelines.  Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh [[WP:RFA|Request for Adminship (RfA)]] after losing control of their account.
-; What do I need to do?
-: Only to follow the instructions in this message.
-:# Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites).
-:# Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable).
-:# Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers.
-; How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)?
-: You can find out more about 2FA at [[m:2FA]].
-|}</div>
 </div>
+</div>
+<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 -->
-<small>This message was sent to all administrators following a [[Special:Permalink/891851004#Return of permissions for compromised administrator accounts|recent motion]].  Thank you for your attention.  For the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]], [[User:Cameron11598|Cameron11598]] 02:18, 4 May 2019 (UTC)</small>
-{{Z152}}<!-- Template:ArbCom 2019 special circular -->
-<!-- Message sent by User:Cameron11598@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Bradv/Adminlist-mms&oldid=891852932 -->