Jump to content

User talk:Omegatron: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Tag: MassMessage delivery
 
(93 intermediate revisions by 31 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div style="padding:5px; margin-bottom:10px; border:1px solid #c0c090; background-color:#FEC; text-align: center"> [[Image:Emblem-important.svg|40px|left]] [[Image:Emblem-important.svg|40px|right]] '''Attention:''' As of [[2008-06-08]], Omegatron is no longer active on Wikipedia.
<p>
If you need me for something, [[Special:EmailUser/Omegatron|contact me by e-mail]].</p></div>

{{Babel|en|fr-1}}
{{Babel|en|fr-1}}


Line 12: Line 8:
|archive = User talk:Omegatron/Archive/%(monthname)s, %(year)d
|archive = User talk:Omegatron/Archive/%(monthname)s, %(year)d
}}
}}
Omega acids[[Special:Contributions/198.255.142.84|198.255.142.84]] ([[User talk:198.255.142.84|talk]]) 10:40, 29 June 2019 (UTC)


== Edit Warring ==
== Redirects ==
'''Template notice'''
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Burlington mayoral election, 2009]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|BRD]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].


On your user/talk pages on enWS, the redirects don't work because of the parentheses, you have to remove them for it to work. — [[User:Alien333|Alien333]] ([[Special:Contributions/Alien333|what I did]] &amp; [[User_talk:Alien333|why I did it wrong]]) 12:18, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->


== Editor experience invitation ==
'''My Added comments'''
* Bold edit .... I don't know when two blogs were added to the arcticle
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Burlington_mayoral_election%2C_2009&type=revision&diff=843093574&oldid=843092844 Revert 1] ..... I reverted them as self-published non-RS blogs
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Burlington_mayoral_election,_2009&diff=843096319&oldid=843093574 Non-discussed re-Revert] (Non-AGF Edit summary "revert blanking of references")... The first un-discussed re-revert of this sort is always the first salvo in and edit war
For reference sources at issue include
* [https://leastevil.blogspot.com/2009/03/irv-fails-in-its-own-backyard.html leastevil blot]
* [https://bolson.org/~bolson/2009/20090303_burlington_vt_mayor.html bolson blog]
However let's not discuss these here. Article talk of the [[WP:RSN]] would be better venues.
It's dangerous, by the way, to edit war on an American politics article after recieving the DS alert notice (see prior thread on your talk page)
[[User:NewsAndEventsGuy|NewsAndEventsGuy]] ([[User talk:NewsAndEventsGuy|talk]]) 01:32, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
:So the thing to do, would be to self revert, and discuss these blogs either at article talk or the noticeboard. Meanwhile, thank you for the addition of real RSs.
[[User:NewsAndEventsGuy|NewsAndEventsGuy]] ([[User talk:NewsAndEventsGuy|talk]]) 01:40, 27 May 2018 (UTC)


Hi Omegatron. I'm looking for experienced editors to interview [[User:Clovermoss/Editor reflections|here]]. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. [[User:Clovermoss|<span style="color:darkorchid">Clovermoss</span><span style="color:green">🍀</span>]] [[User talk:Clovermoss|(talk)]] 03:26, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
: Uh, you're the one in the wrong here. I'm reverting destructive edits to the status quo. [[Wikipedia:Tendentious editing#One who disputes the reliability of apparently good sources|Stop removing sources just because you disagree with them]]. — [[User:Omegatron|Omegatron]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Omegatron|talk]]) 15:51, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
::FYI I have sought input from the Reliable Sources noticeboard in [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Blogs_discussing_Ranked_Choice_Voting|this thread]] via [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AReliable_sources%2FNoticeboard&type=revision&diff=843233838&oldid=843233246 this diff].[[User:NewsAndEventsGuy|NewsAndEventsGuy]] ([[User talk:NewsAndEventsGuy|talk]]) 20:09, 27 May 2018 (UTC)


== Invitation to participate in a research ==
::: '''O!''' i am friggin' intrigued that you know about this Burlington IRV issue. being from Burlington, having voted in that election, and having written about IRV vs. Condorcet (and, at one time, being a friend of the candidate who got screwed by IRV), this is an issue close to my heart. are you involved in the Election Methods mailing list? (send me an email or facebook, i think you know who i am.) bestest, [[Special:Contributions/50.47.109.19|50.47.109.19]] ([[User talk:50.47.109.19|talk]]) 01:30, 5 December 2018 (UTC)


Hello,
== hay O!!! ==


The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this '''[https://wikimediafoundation.limesurvey.net/294789?lang=en anonymous survey]'''.
i didn't know you were back at Wikipedia. for some reason i thought you left it.


You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
so i took a look at your contribs and see that it got thin around 2010 (with a 10 month gap) and then slowly the frequency of edits increased.


The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its [[m:Special:MyLanguage/Research:Wikipedia Administrator Recruitment, Retention, and Attrition|Meta page]] and view its [[wmf:Special:MyLanguage/Legal:Administrator Experiences 2024 Survey Privacy Statement|privacy statement]] .
so welcome from a friend who dares not identify himself lest trouble happens. i do DSP. you might remember me.


Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
so greetings from anonymous.


Kind Regards,
[[Special:Contributions/50.47.109.19|50.47.109.19]] ([[User talk:50.47.109.19|talk]]) 04:41, 4 December 2018 (UTC)


[[mw:Special:MyLanguage/Wikimedia Research|WMF Research Team]]
: Yeah I left, but now I've been contributing again a little, but I'm not as invested as I used to be. You can see a graph here: https://xtools.wmflabs.org/ec-yearcounts/en.wikipedia.org/Omegatron
: I suspect I know who you are, and we still interact on other sites/wikis/mailing lists under different usernames. Not sure if you realize which names are me. :D — [[User:Omegatron|Omegatron]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Omegatron|talk]]) 00:25, 5 December 2018 (UTC)


<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[[User:BGerdemann (WMF)|BGerdemann (WMF)]] ([[User talk:BGerdemann (WMF)|talk]]) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
:: so O, are you on the dsp stackexchange? i don't do comp.dsp much anymore. (ASCII math is uglier than <math>\operatorname{LaTeX}</math> math.) [[Special:Contributions/50.47.109.19|50.47.109.19]] ([[User talk:50.47.109.19|talk]]) 01:05, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 -->


== Nomination of [[:Social_utility_efficiency]] for deletion ==
::: I sent a Facebook message to someone who fits the description. We'll see if you're the same person. :) — [[User:Omegatron|Omegatron]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Omegatron|talk]]) 06:28, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article [[:Social_utility_efficiency]], to which you have [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/authorship/en.wikipedia.org/Social_utility_efficiency significantly contributed], is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or if it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].


The discussion will take place at '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social utility efficiency]]''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
== Merger discussion for [[Path loss]] ==


To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit [[User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier|the configuration page]]. Delivered by ''[[User:SDZeroBot|SDZeroBot]]'' ([[User talk:SDZeroBot|talk]]) 01:01, 5 November 2024 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template -->
[[File:Merge-arrows.svg|50px|frameless|left]] An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash;[[Path loss]]&mdash;has been '''proposed for [[Wikipedia:Merging|merging]]''' with another article. If you are interested, please participate in [[Talk:Path loss#Merge|the merger discussion]]. Thank you. [[User:Pierre cb|Pierre cb]] ([[User talk:Pierre cb|talk]]) 14:11, 3 March 2019 (UTC)


: [[User:Affinepplan]], why not spend your time creating content instead of destroying it? 😑 — [[User:Omegatron|Omegatron]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Omegatron|talk]]) 15:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
== ArbCom 2019 special circular ==
::please see [[WP:Content removal]]
::the deletion of unsourced, inaccurate, POV, or in this case irrelevant content is a productive contribution to Wikipedia just as creation is. [[User:Affinepplan|Affinepplan]] ([[User talk:Affinepplan|talk]]) 15:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)


::: How are concepts from social choice theory not relevant to include in an encyclopedia? — [[User:Omegatron|Omegatron]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Omegatron|talk]]) 16:07, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
<div class="notice" style="background:#fff1d2; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height:40px; line-height:130.7%; font-weight: 130.7%;">
::::please read [[WP:Notability]]. the only reliable source discussing this metric in detail is a single publication by the progenitor from several decades ago. [[User:Affinepplan|Affinepplan]] ([[User talk:Affinepplan|talk]]) 16:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
{|
|valign="top" style="padding: 0.5em 1em 0 0.25em;"| [[File:Warning sign font awesome.svg|40px|center|link=|alt=Icon of a white exclamation mark within a black triangle]]
|<span style="font-size: 125%;">'''Administrators [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Security|must]] secure their accounts'''</span>
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
* Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email
* [[Special:ChangePassword|Change your password now]] if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, [https://haveibeenpwned.com/Passwords exposed], or weak
* [[Wikipedia:User_account_security#Two-factor authentication (2FA)|Enable two-factor authentication now]] for improved security
|}
<span style="color:#5871C6;cursor:pointer" class="mw-customtoggle-ArbCom_2019_special_circular">{{clickable button|1=View additional information}}</span>
</div><div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" id="mw-customcollapsible-ArbCom_2019_special_circular" style="display:none">
<div style="border-style: dotted; border-color: #886644; border-width: 0 3px 3px 3px; padding: 0 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em;">


::::: That's obviously not true; there are numerous references in academic literature. What's your motivation for trying to delete this? — [[User:Omegatron|Omegatron]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Omegatron|talk]]) 03:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
{| style="border-left: 3px solid black; padding-left: 1em;"
::::::> there are numerous references in academic literature
|{{null}}
::::::there are not. [[User:Affinepplan|Affinepplan]] ([[User talk:Affinepplan|talk]]) 04:00, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
; Why have I received this message?
: All administrators are receiving it.


::::::: Yes there are plenty for notability; I've added a list to the AfD. Why are you trying to delete this? — [[User:Omegatron|Omegatron]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Omegatron|talk]]) 00:14, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
; What prompted you to send this message?
::::::::please see my response to that list.
: Recently, several Wikipedia admin accounts were compromised. The admin accounts were [[WP:LEVEL1|desysopped on an emergency basis]]. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh [[WP:RFA|Request for Adminship (RfA)]] after losing control of their account.
::::::::> Why are you trying to delete this?
::::::::because it fails [[WP:Notability]] [[User:Affinepplan|Affinepplan]] ([[User talk:Affinepplan|talk]]) 00:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)


== Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research ==
; What do I need to do?
: Only to follow the instructions in this message.
:# Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites).
:# Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable).
:# Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers.


Hello,
; How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)?
: You can find out more about 2FA at [[m:2FA]].
|}</div>
</div>


I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its [[m:Special:MyLanguage/Research:Wikipedia Administrator Recruitment, Retention, and Attrition|Meta page]] and view its [[wmf:Special:MyLanguage/Legal:Administrator Experiences 2024 Survey Privacy Statement|privacy statement]].
<small>This message was sent to all administrators following a [[Special:Permalink/891851004#Return of permissions for compromised administrator accounts|recent motion]]. Thank you for your attention. For the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]], [[User:Cameron11598|Cameron11598]] 02:18, 4 May 2019 (UTC)</small>
{{Z152}}<!-- Template:ArbCom 2019 special circular -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Cameron11598@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Bradv/Adminlist-mms&oldid=891852932 -->


Take the survey '''[https://wikimediafoundation.limesurvey.net/294789?lang=en here]'''.
== Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular) ==


Kind Regards,
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.


[[mw:Special:MyLanguage/Wikimedia Research|WMF Research Team]]
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Security|required]] to "have strong passwords and [[Wikipedia:Personal security practices|follow appropriate personal security practices]]." We have [[Special:Permalink/891851004#Return of permissions for compromised administrator accounts|updated]] our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, [[WP:2FA|two-factor authentication]] remains an ''optional'' means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.


<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[[User:BGerdemann (WMF)|BGerdemann (WMF)]] ([[User talk:BGerdemann (WMF)|talk]]) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 -->


== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
For the Arbitration Committee, -[[User:Cameron11598|Cameron11598]] 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)</small>
{{Z83}}<!-- Template:ArbCom 2019 special circular correction -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Cameron11598@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Bradv/Adminlist-mms&oldid=891852932 -->


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
==Disambiguation link notification for June 21==
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2024|2024 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[Nanson's method]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Trinity College]] ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Nanson%27s_method check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Nanson%27s_method?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are [[WP:INTDABLINK|usually incorrect]], since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].)</small>


If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 07:29, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 -->

Latest revision as of 00:04, 19 November 2024

Redirects

[edit]

On your user/talk pages on enWS, the redirects don't work because of the parentheses, you have to remove them for it to work. — Alien333 (what I did & why I did it wrong) 12:18, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Editor experience invitation

[edit]

Hi Omegatron. I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 03:26, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

[edit]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Nomination of Social_utility_efficiency for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Social_utility_efficiency, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social utility efficiency until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Affinepplan, why not spend your time creating content instead of destroying it? 😑 — Omegatron (talk) 15:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
please see WP:Content removal
the deletion of unsourced, inaccurate, POV, or in this case irrelevant content is a productive contribution to Wikipedia just as creation is. Affinepplan (talk) 15:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How are concepts from social choice theory not relevant to include in an encyclopedia? — Omegatron (talk) 16:07, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
please read WP:Notability. the only reliable source discussing this metric in detail is a single publication by the progenitor from several decades ago. Affinepplan (talk) 16:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's obviously not true; there are numerous references in academic literature. What's your motivation for trying to delete this? — Omegatron (talk) 03:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
> there are numerous references in academic literature
there are not. Affinepplan (talk) 04:00, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes there are plenty for notability; I've added a list to the AfD. Why are you trying to delete this? — Omegatron (talk) 00:14, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
please see my response to that list.
> Why are you trying to delete this?
because it fails WP:Notability Affinepplan (talk) 00:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

[edit]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Omegatron&oldid=1258257715"