User talk:Jc121383

Greetings...

Hello, Jc121383, and welcome to Wikipedia!

To get started, click on the link that says "welcome".

I (and the rest of us here, too!) hope you like it here and decide to stay!

Happy editing! Mitico (talk) 19:32, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Category:Portland Pirates players

Please do not add players to categories such as Category:Portland Pirates players until they have actually played in a regular-season or playoff game with that team. None of the Buffalo Sabres' prospects you added to that category have played for Portland yet. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. You never know: any one of those players could make the Sabres' roster straight out of training camp and never play for Portland. Or they could be traded before ever playing for Portland. Or they could suffer a career-ending injury and never play for Portland. In any case, please wait until they actually play for the team before categorizing them thusly. I actually heard one of these edits mentioned on WGR this morning (which tipped me off to the issue), as the morning show crew was wondering why Dylan Hunter was listed as having played for Portland when he hasn't yet. These types of errors hurt Wikipedia's credibilty; please think about this when editing. Thank you! Skudrafan1 (talk) 12:34, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Buffalo, NY restaurants

I have nominated Category:Buffalo, NY restaurants (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Restaurant in Buffalo, New York (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Bencherlite^Talk 11:48, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Uniformity of rosters

I have started a discussion over at Talk:List of current NLL team rosters which discussed the roster used on this page. If you are interested, please let me know what you think. Mitico (talk) 17:22, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Diacritics at NHL team articles

I've noticed you've tried to hide diacritics from the birthplaces section, on some of the NHL team article's Template rosters. I agree fully with your actions, but they're futile (trust me, I know). GoodDay (talk) 21:49, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, what's the deal with some people telling to change the names but not the birthplaces. That seems fairly inconsistent and downright stupid. Jc121383 (talk) 21:20, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Djsasso will explain it to you; I'd rather avoid it, as it gets me too frustrated. GoodDay (talk) 23:22, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

The reason for player names is a compromise because certain individuals argue bitterly that english doesn't use them. However there are a large number of people who believe that english does. Without getting into the huge arguements that come along with this topic basically it comes down to this. NHL sweaters do not have diacritics so we don't use them for players names because in a way you can argue the most common useage when it comes to the NHL is to not use them. Birthplaces on the other hand are very different as they are proper names to cities and would be translated incorrectly if you removed the diacritics as English does keep the diacritics in place names unless there is a completely different english word for a city name. Munich is an example of a completely different name in english. There is pretty much no basis for removing them from birth places. Yes this makes for inconsistancies but it keeps the massive edit warring that occurs around this subject all around wikipedia from rearing its ugly head in hockey articles. -Djsasso (talk) 20:26, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

OK, thank you for the explanation. And as per the code on my user page, I am working on some new templates within my user subpages. Thank you also for removing the deletion notice. Jc121383 (talk) 20:36, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Yup, I figured that was what you were doing. Just was confused for a second because I thought the template was deleted and then I realized you had just copied over all the code so I removed the deletion notice that you didn't need. -Djsasso (talk) 20:40, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Jeff Giuliano

FYI: He was an unrestricted free agent and the Kings had no plant to re-sign him, according to their general manager, Dean Lombardi. Giuliano signed with Moscow Dynamo. I doubt you'll see much online about it, except from a Russian site, since he wasn't really a noteworthy player at the NHL level. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 22:56, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

As an aside, if you want online confirmation of this, go to www.eurohockey.net and click on transfers. Its listed there and that site is likely the most accurate site on the net for transfers to and from Europe. Shootmaster 44 (talk) 01:29, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Actually, make that Minsk Dynamo... Eurohockey.net -Transfers -- Gmatsuda (talk) 04:00, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Kanjam.jpg

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Kanjam.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because images on Wikipedia need to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License or another free license, which allow anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file, please understand that the vast majority of images found on the internet are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Most content on the internet is copyrighted and the creator of the image has exclusive rights to use it. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others - do not upload images that violate others' copyrights. In certain limited cases, we may be able to use an image under a claim of fair use - if you are certain that fair use would apply here, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list. If no fair use rationale applies, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Ian¹³/t 21:54, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Richmond/Gwinnett Braves

It could be argued that the Gwinnett Braves are not officially that yet; though the AAA season is over, it's not 2009 yet. Plus there's no stadium in Gwinnett Co. for them to play at yet even. That being the case, I'll relent to your judgment. --Mhking (talk) 03:46, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about that. Official affliation terminations have come down and I thought I heard about Atlanta/Richmond, but I double checked and I just heard Cleveland/Buffalo, Washington/Columbus, and Toronto/Syracuse. You can change it back. I was just being a little overprotective of a page I created. Jc121383 (talk) 14:55, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Dowd

I removed Dowd because he is a free agent with no contract with the Flyers. He's a try out invitee to camp, with no guarantees of making a roster. Bryan Berard is in the same boat. FYI Aubin just signed a one year deal: he's technically more of a Flyer than Dowd at this point. ccwaters (talk) 20:47, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

The Project calls for UFAs to remain on their last team's roster until they are on another team or retired. Since he still is on the team and the "(UFA)" is noted, he should remain. Plus what if he re-signs? It's stupid to remove him just to put him back. Jc121383 (talk) 03:54, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure where the project declared that. I'm not going to make a big stink over it though: the rosters are going to be in flux over the next few weeks with training camps opening. ccwaters (talk) 11:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Me neither, however, the more new roster features we can use (the UFA tag) the more smoothly our roster changeover will go. Jc121383 (talk) 20:21, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of current IL team rosters

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of current IL team rosters, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. NatureBoyMD (talk) 03:21, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Minnesota Timberwolves logo.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Minnesota Timberwolves logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kalel2007 (talk) 04:06, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Scsrmain.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Scsrmain.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:13, 3 May 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 11:13, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Jc121383! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 7 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Clay Hill (lacrosse) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:27, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Jc121383/Kan Jam

User:Jc121383/Kan Jam, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jc121383/Kan Jam and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jc121383/Kan Jam during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:52, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Clay Hill (lacrosse player) AFD

Please see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Clay_Hill_(lacrosse_player). Simply south ...... discombobulating confusing ideas for just 8 years 18:45, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jc121383. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jc121383. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Empire State College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orange (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)