User talk:Knoper: Difference between revisions
dablink notification message (see the FAQ) |
→ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message: new section Tag: |
||
(23 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}} |
|||
== Supply management == |
|||
Hi. Thanks for your praise, and thanks to you too for your edits to [[Supply management (Canada)|Supply management]]! I appreciate your extensive editing and having a fresh set of eyes look at it, and in a great many places you improved my language, logic, or tone. I did undo or partially undo a handful of changes where I thought it best, but in every case I'm open to change or discussion. Cheers, '''[[User:Oreo Priest|<span style="color:green">Oreo Priest</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Oreo Priest|talk]]</sup> 15:45, 22 November 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== November 2013 == |
|||
== Referendum == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, I'm [[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]]. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=583683885 your edit] to [[History of the St. Louis Rams]] may have broken the [[syntax]] by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just [{{fullurl:History of the St. Louis Rams|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20{{subst</noinclude>:REVISIONUSER}}§ion=new my operator's talk page]. |
|||
:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: |
|||
*<nowiki>[[Charlotte]] to win an expansion team, St. Louis lost to a group from [[Jacksonville, Florida]]. </nowiki>{{red|'''('''}}<nowiki>So certain, in fact, did it appear that St. Louis would gain an expansion franchise, that the team</nowiki> |
|||
Thanks, <!-- (1, 0, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->[[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]] ([[User talk:BracketBot|talk]]) 17:15, 28 November 2013 (UTC) |
|||
My pleasure. I vaguely remembered the incident, but didn't have a source for it until I decided to actually tackle starting an article about Joyce Napier yesterday. |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for January 26== |
|||
I am admittedly a little concerned that for the moment, it's being presented as sort of an ''isolated'' incident, where in reality there were some other significant media relations bungles, on ''both'' sides of the campaign, beyond just that one alone — going into a bit more depth about the tactical errors and backtracks on ''both'' sides, I think, would help significantly. |
|||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Canadian Football League in the United States]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Fred Smith]] ([[tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Canadian_Football_League_in_the_United_States|check to confirm]] | [[tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Canadian_Football_League_in_the_United_States|fix with Dab solver]]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> |
|||
You're absolutely right about the decline of the community of interest on the topic, but I'm finding that to be a phenomenon right across the board for Wikipedia as a whole these days — there seem to be far less people around in 2015 than there used to be, and both maintenance and content projects are really suffering for it. (Just as an example, I find that when I initiate an AFD or CFD discussion now, it ''routinely'' has to get relisted for another week at least once, and sometimes ''twice'', not because of actual debate or disagreement but for lack of anybody even participating in the discussion at ''all''.) I'm a lot more worried about the longterm viability of Wikipedia now than I used to be, frankly. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 19:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC) |
|||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:00, 26 January 2014 (UTC) |
|||
: Agreed Re backtracks, I intend to add quite a few more. [[User:Knoper|Knoper]] ([[User talk:Knoper#top|talk]]) 20:03, 16 February 2015 (UTC) |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for March 9== |
|||
== Contact info == |
|||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Quebec referendum, 1995]], you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages [[Union Nationale]] and [[Reform Party]] ([[tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Quebec_referendum%2C_1995|check to confirm]] | [[tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Quebec_referendum%2C_1995|fix with Dab solver]]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> |
|||
Hi, I'd like to get in touch with you, but not on your discussion page. I'm not super familiar with Wiki functions. I know I can message admins but can't seem to message you. Not sure if it's possible or I just forgot how. Thx :( --[[User:Dekk01|Dekk01]] ([[User talk:Dekk01|talk]]) 20:30, 20 July 2015 (UTC) |
|||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:00, 9 March 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:: Hi there, if you'd like to send me an e-mail, go ahead and send it to jerseymacawesome@yahoo.ca [[User:Knoper|Knoper]] ([[User talk:Knoper#top|talk]]) 20:48, 20 July 2015 (UTC) |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for October 24== |
|||
== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Quebec referendum, 1995]]== |
|||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Pierre Trudeau]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Donald Macdonald]]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> |
|||
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article [[Quebec referendum, 1995]] you nominated for [[WP:GA|GA]]-status according to the [[WP:WIAGA|criteria]]. [[Image:Time2wait.svg|20px]] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:Coemgenus|Coemgenus]]</small> -- [[User:Coemgenus|Coemgenus]] ([[User talk:Coemgenus|talk]]) 18:20, 27 July 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Quebec referendum, 1995]]== |
|||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:21, 24 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
The article [[Quebec referendum, 1995]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has been placed on hold [[Image:Symbol wait.svg|20px]]. The article is close to meeting the [[WP:GA?|good article criteria]], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See [[Talk:Quebec referendum, 1995]] for things which need to be addressed. <!-- Template:GANotice result=hold --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:Coemgenus|Coemgenus]]</small> -- [[User:Coemgenus|Coemgenus]] ([[User talk:Coemgenus|talk]]) 00:20, 9 August 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Quebec referendum, 1995]]== |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for October 31== |
|||
The article [[Quebec referendum, 1995]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has passed [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]]; see [[Talk:Quebec referendum, 1995]] for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#To_nominate_an_article|nominate it]] to appear in Did you know.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:Coemgenus|Coemgenus]]</small> -- [[User:Coemgenus|Coemgenus]] ([[User talk:Coemgenus|talk]]) 12:21, 25 August 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== Congrats on the "Good Article"== |
|||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Pierre Trudeau]], you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages [[CTV]], [[Constitutional convention]] and [[David Lewis]]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> |
|||
I submitted the project to more or less mirror where possible the french version of the article on the "Projet Quebec" page to let people know what is going on. I anticipate the on rush of separatist trash talk and interference almost immediately judging from the fact they monitor my every comment with anonymous adding of harassing comments. Depending on how many paragraphs per topic, I suggest about a month per topic, including translation, amalgamation if more info exists on french version, and discussions. Everything will be done on the french discussion page. |
|||
Thanks again and congrats for your excellent and devoted work!!! --[[User:Dekk01|Dekk01]] ([[User talk:Dekk01|talk]]) 18:03, 25 August 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::Thank you, much appreciated. Anything I can do to help, just ask. [[User:Knoper|Knoper]] ([[User talk:Knoper#top|talk]]) 18:54, 25 August 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== Supply management == |
|||
== December 2015 == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, I'm [[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]]. I have automatically detected that <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=695116186 your edit] to [[Meech Lake Accord]] may have broken the [[syntax]] by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [{{fullurl:Meech Lake Accord|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20{{subst</noinclude>:REVISIONUSER}}§ion=new my operator's talk page].</span> |
|||
Hi. Thanks for your praise, and thanks to you too for your edits to [[Supply management (Canada)|Supply management]]! I appreciate your extensive editing and having a fresh set of eyes look at it, and in a great many places you improved my language, logic, or tone. I did undo or partially undo a handful of changes where I thought it best, but in every case I'm open to change or discussion. Cheers, '''[[User:Oreo Priest|<span style="color:green">Oreo Priest</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Oreo Priest|talk]]</sup> 15:45, 22 November 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: |
|||
*<nowiki>was seen as Federal acquiescence to and, in the case of [[Lucien Bouchard]] and Louis Plamondon</nowiki>{{red|''']]'''}}<nowiki>, approval of Bill 178.{{sfn|Cohen|p=198}}</nowiki> |
|||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow [[User:BracketBot#Opting out|these opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, <!-- (0, -2, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->[[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]] ([[User talk:BracketBot|talk]]) 22:15, 13 December 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== Hi Knoper == |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for December 8== |
|||
Thank you for your feedback on my "Quebec referendum, 1995" edit. I have just read you user page. I will not be the "Quebec Sovereignist wikipedian" checking your "ideological blind spots" :) but maybe I will be one of them from time to time. I do not give much time to Wikipedia but I will continue to hang around now and then for years to come - French Wikipedia is such a disaster :( . It is so true that we all have blind spots. I personally think perfect objectivity does not exist and the only way to get closer to it is to listen to different points of view, weigh the best arguments from every sides and then only make up your mind. Humand brain is made of all kind of cognitive biases. If you are against Quebec separation, I will happily let your "ideological blind spots" challenge mine, as comparing arguments is essential (the only way?) to progress. [[User:Popol0707|Popol0707]] ([[User talk:Popol0707|talk]]) 14:17, 6 March 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== To You & To Knoper == |
|||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Quebec referendum, 1995]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[John Rae]]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> |
|||
The Quebec referendums are not about "sovereignty", they are about Communism. This web site specializes in exclusive English translations of non-publicized French-language documents, including the 1972 manifesto of the PARTI QUEBECOIS for a Communist State of Quebec: https://nosnowinmoscow.wordpress.com/ You can download that manifesto in a zip file in the sidebar (see the blue lightning). The zip contains a scan of the original French book, and a PDF of the exclusive English translation, along with photos of the French book on the shelf in the university law library. |
|||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:13, 8 December 2014 (UTC) |
|||
The word "sovereignty" is a vague misnomer applied to conceal the real intentions behind the referendums, i.e., restructuring of all of Canada in post-Yes "negotiations". The word sovereignty is vague and deliberately misleading, because it means many things in different situations. The purpose of the Quebec referendums, however, is to [1] hijack the national legislative powers out of the Parliament in Ottawa, combine them with the Provincial legislative powers in the Quebec legislature at Quebec City, and then restructure Quebec on the model of MOSCOW, by devolving these powers into communist-style REGIONS, intended to become future international "multicultural" city-states when Canada and its Provinces are dissolved. This is not "sovereignty" for the French Canadians, it is a device to permanently remove the legislative sovereignty and self-government of the French Canadians as obtained in 1867 under the British North America Act 1867, and hand it over to multicultural expanded municipal entities on the one hand, and to new regional super-bodies on the other hand, the whole under a world government. |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for December 17== |
|||
[2] The other purpose, and this is the main one, of the 1980 and 1995 referendums is to provide the federal level of Canada with a pretext to in fact "negotiate" the dismantling of Canada on the same model as the Communist model planned for Quebec. This is why Canada has the highest world intake of refugees and mass immigration.... all focused on the cities. At the end of the 1990s, the Ontario government created a mega-city out of Toronto by attaching outlying towns and villages. In 2000, the PARTI QUEBECOIS government created 5 megacities in Quebec, the two most notable being the "Greater Montreal REGION" and the expanded Quebec City REGION. These are basically proto-Soviet international city states, created as money-sucking monoliths as a pretext to have them DEMAND sovereign international powers and financial resources to RUN these new entities.... on the model of Moscow as described by Communist sociologist Morris Zeitlin in a 1975 issue of a journal of the Communist Party of the USA. In 2014, as a matter of FACT confirmable in the news, the mayors of the two megacities of Montreal and Quebec BOTH demanded international status together with powers and fiscal resources to run these REGIONS as international city states. That was Denis Coderre and Regis Lebeaume. That joint demand, widely broadcast in the news, in fact represents the recommended attack upon the Quebec legislature and the Parliament in Ottawa, as devised by Communist and Quebec city lawyer Guy Bertrand the 2014 edition of his French-only book, whose title in English would be "The Liberty-Nation Project" (see: https://nosnowinmoscow.wordpress.com/2015/12/10/communist-guy-bertrands-new-plan-to-smash-quebec-into-communist-regions-part-i/). Bertrand recommended that rather than a referendum on the style of 1980 and 1995, the third (and final) attack on Canada should be done through the megacities. He specifically recommended that both the Montreal and Quebec megacities should attack the Quebec legislature to remove its powers by demanding sovereign powers and fiscal resources for themselves. This would put CONTROL of the dismantling process at a different level than the referendums, which likely have been RIGGED by the way, although to no avail in 1995 because of a last-minute Canada rally in downtown Montreal which swelled the NO vote past the level of rigging they had thought was required to pull it off. It would place the destruction of Quebec and Canada into the hands of the MAYORS of the megacities, leaving nothing to the voters except a potential referendum to rubber-stamp the consequences, thus making it "look" "democratic". |
|||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Canada Act 1982]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Constitutional convention]]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> |
|||
Canada is being restructured for a Communist world-state.... but it is also a ZIONIST project, because in 1982 our lawful Constitution of 1867 and our lawful Parliamentary form of government were both replaced by Pierre Elliott Trudeau (a world-government leftist who led a Communist delegation at Moscow in 1952) and his pals from the Socialist International, i.e., the NDP. The new (illegal) constitution features Talmudic "balancing" or "proportionality" as its core feature at article 1 of the Charter, usually called the "Section 1 guarantee and limitation clause". |
|||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:02, 17 December 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== December 2014 == |
|||
In addition, over the past 16-20 years, the French Canadian Code of Civil Procedure has been revised by the ruling PARTI QUEBECOIS and their fellow "LIBERALS" (the Liberals in fact set up the PQ from behind the scenes) to adopt Talmudic "balancing" and "proportionality", which has nothing to do with French Canadian law and culture, but is Zionist in nature. |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, I'm [[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]]. I have automatically detected that <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=638854138 your edit] to [[Quebec referendum, 1995]] may have broken the [[syntax]] by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [{{fullurl:Quebec referendum, 1995|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20{{subst</noinclude>:REVISIONUSER}}§ion=new my operator's talk page].</span> |
|||
:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: |
|||
*<nowiki>riding.<ref name=Chomedey /> A study released months after the referendum by [McGill University]</nowiki>{{red|''']'''}}<nowiki> sociologist Maurice Pinard, statistician Janusz Kaczorowski and lawyer Andrew Orkin, concluded</nowiki> |
|||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow [[User:BracketBot#Opting out|these opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, <!-- (0, -1, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->[[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]] ([[User talk:BracketBot|talk]]) 01:47, 20 December 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== January 2015 == |
|||
Therefore, when you speak about Quebec "sovereignists" and the "ideology", the so-called "sovereignists" have no clue what is really going on or how they are being manipulated to dismantle and destroy their own government, and their own rights to self-determination established by Confederation. They have no clue the PQ is communist, and moreover, Communitarian, which is Communist-Zionist. The only way French Canadians can free themselves and prevent the rapidly encroaching loss of their real sovereignty in Confederation, is to wake up and throw out the Communists and the Zionists, and also throw out the phony federal Charter, which is a coup d'état, as admitted in 1982 by one of its chief architects, Jew Barry Lee Strayer, see an OCR of the document here: |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, I'm [[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]]. I have automatically detected that <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=640883656 your edit] to [[Pierre Trudeau]] may have broken the [[syntax]] by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [{{fullurl:Pierre Trudeau|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20{{subst</noinclude>:REVISIONUSER}}§ion=new my operator's talk page].</span> |
|||
{{{!}} class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: left; border: 1px solid silver; margin-top: 0.2em;" {{!}}- |
|||
! style="background-color: #FAA;" {{!}} <div style="font-size:112%;">List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page<span style="font-size:88%;margin-left:3em;">(Click show <span style="font-size:130%;">⇨</span>)</span></div> |
|||
{{!}}- |
|||
{{!}} style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white; " {{!}} <div style="font-size:112%;"> |
|||
*<nowiki>], Saskatchewan on July 17, 1969, Trudeau met with a group of farmers who were protesting the </nowiki>{{red|'''[['''}}<nowiki>Canadian Wheat Board. The widely remembered perception is that Trudeau dismissed the protesters'</nowiki> |
|||
*<nowiki>* Trudeau was ranked No.5 of the first 20 Prime Ministers of Canada </nowiki>{{red|'''('''}}<nowiki>through Jean Chrétien in a survey of Canadian historians. The survey was used in the book ''Prime</nowiki> |
|||
*<nowiki> | ref = {{sfnRef|Fortin </nowiki>{{red|'''('''}}<nowiki>2000-10-09}}</nowiki> |
|||
</div> |
|||
{{!}}} |
|||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow [[User:BracketBot#Opting out|these opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, <!-- (0, 2, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->[[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]] ([[User talk:BracketBot|talk]]) 02:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
https://patriationandlegitimacyofthecanadianconstitution.wordpress.com/ |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for January 4== |
|||
Your edits on issues like these will all depend on whether Wikipedia's role is to regurgitate mere opinions of manipulated "sovereignists" and headlines from the controlled news, or whether it prefers to deal with facts, such as those at the links above. |
|||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Quebec referendum, 1995]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Bombardier]]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> |
|||
Kind regards. |
|||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:01, 4 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Meech Lake Accord]]== |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for January 11== |
|||
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article [[Meech Lake Accord]] you nominated for [[WP:GA|GA]]-status according to the [[WP:WIAGA|criteria]]. [[Image:Time2wait.svg|20px]] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:Sainsf|Sainsf]]</small> -- [[User:Sainsf|Sainsf]] ([[User talk:Sainsf|talk]]) 07:01, 5 June 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Meech Lake Accord]]== |
|||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Quebec referendum, 1980]], you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages [[Union Nationale]] and [[Claude Morin]]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> |
|||
The article [[Meech Lake Accord]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has failed [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]]; see [[Talk:Meech Lake Accord]] for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. <!-- Template:GANotice result=fail --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:Sainsf|Sainsf]]</small> -- [[User:Sainsf|Sainsf]] ([[User talk:Sainsf|talk]]) 11:01, 24 June 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== [[WP:ACE2016|ArbCom Elections 2016]]: Voting now open! == |
|||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 08:50, 11 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Knoper. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2016|2016 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for January 24== |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Quebec referendum, 1995]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Gaspé]] ([http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Quebec_referendum%2C_1995 check to confirm] | [http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Quebec_referendum%2C_1995 fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2016/Candidates|the candidates' statements]] and submit your choices on '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/399|the voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) |
|||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 08:57, 24 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} |
|||
== Reference Errors on 4 February == |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/39&oldid=750775228 --> |
|||
== ArbCom 2017 election voter message == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, I'm [[User:ReferenceBot|ReferenceBot]]. I have '''automatically detected''' that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. {{#ifeq:1|1|It is|They are}} as follows: |
|||
*On the [[:Warren Kinsella]] page, [//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=645627363 your edit] caused an [[:Category:Pages with citations using unnamed parameters|unnamed parameter error]] <small>([[Help:CS1_errors#Text_.22.3F.3F.3F.3F.22_ignored|help]])</small>. ([{{fullurl:Warren Kinsella|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AReferenceBot%7CReferenceBot%5D%5D}} Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F645627363%7C{{Replace|Warren Kinsella| |%20}}%5D%5D Ask for help]) |
|||
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a [[false positive]], you can [//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20{{subst</noinclude>:REVISIONUSER}}§ion=new report it to my operator]. |
|||
Thanks, <!-- User:ReferenceBot/inform -->[[User:ReferenceBot|ReferenceBot]] ([[User talk:ReferenceBot|talk]]) 00:28, 5 February 2015 (UTC) |
|||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Knoper. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2017|2017 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
== Referendum == |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
My pleasure. I vaguely remembered the incident, but didn't have a source for it until I decided to actually tackle starting an article about Joyce Napier yesterday. |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2017/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/400|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) |
|||
I am admittedly a little concerned that for the moment, it's being presented as sort of an ''isolated'' incident, where in reality there were some other significant media relations bungles, on ''both'' sides of the campaign, beyond just that one alone — going into a bit more depth about the tactical errors and backtracks on ''both'' sides, I think, would help significantly. |
|||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/06&oldid=813406902 --> |
|||
==Merger discussion for [[Kitchen Meeting]]== |
|||
You're absolutely right about the decline of the community of interest on the topic, but I'm finding that to be a phenomenon right across the board for Wikipedia as a whole these days — there seem to be far less people around in 2015 than there used to be, and both maintenance and content projects are really suffering for it. (Just as an example, I find that when I initiate an AFD or CFD discussion now, it ''routinely'' has to get relisted for another week at least once, and sometimes ''twice'', not because of actual debate or disagreement but for lack of anybody even participating in the discussion at ''all''.) I'm a lot more worried about the longterm viability of Wikipedia now than I used to be, frankly. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 19:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC) |
|||
[[File:Merge-arrows.svg|50px|frameless|left]] An article that you have been involved in editing—[[Kitchen Meeting]]—has been '''proposed for [[Wikipedia:Merging|merging]]''' with another article. If you are interested, please participate in [[Talk:Patriation#Merger_proposal|the merger discussion]]. Thank you. [[User:Samuell|Samuell]] <small>[[User_talk:Samuell|<sup>Lift me up</sup> or <sub>put me down</sub>]]</small> 01:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== ArbCom 2018 election voter message == |
|||
: Agreed Re backtracks, I intend to add quite a few more. [[User:Knoper|Knoper]] ([[User talk:Knoper#top|talk]]) 20:03, 16 February 2015 (UTC) |
|||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Knoper. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2018|2018 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for March 25== |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Progressive Conservative leadership election, 1983]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Union Nationale]] ([http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Progressive_Conservative_leadership_election%2C_1983 check to confirm] | [http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Progressive_Conservative_leadership_election%2C_1983 fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2018/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/710|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) |
|||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 08:58, 25 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/06&oldid=866998196 --> |
|||
== Lawyers and law students' signatures needed for Supreme Court amicus brief in favor of publishing the law == |
|||
Hello, given your userbox I thought you might be interested in helping [[Carl Malamud]]'s case for the [[public domain]], crucial also for [[Wikisource]]: https://boingboing.net/2019/04/25/happy-law-day.html . Best regards, [[User:Nemo_bis|Nemo]] 21:06, 25 April 2019 (UTC) |
|||
== WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge third anniversary == |
|||
== Contact info == |
|||
[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge|The 10,000 Challenge]] of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada|WikiProject Canada]] is approaching its third-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and have no unsourced claims. |
|||
Hi, I'd like to get in touch with you, but not on your discussion page. I'm not super familiar with Wiki functions. I know I can message admins but can't seem to message you. Not sure if it's possible or I just forgot how. Thx :( --[[User:Dekk01|Dekk01]] ([[User talk:Dekk01|talk]]) 20:30, 20 July 2015 (UTC) |
|||
<inputbox> |
|||
:: Hi there, if you'd like to send me an e-mail, go ahead and send it to jerseymacawesome@yahoo.ca [[User:Knoper|Knoper]] ([[User talk:Knoper#top|talk]]) 20:48, 20 July 2015 (UTC) |
|||
type=create |
|||
editintro=Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge/Editintro |
|||
buttonlabel=Submit an article |
|||
bgcolor=clear |
|||
width=50 |
|||
default=Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge/Recent additions |
|||
hidden=yes |
|||
page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge/Recent additions |
|||
summary=added article to challenge list |
|||
</inputbox> |
|||
== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Quebec referendum, 1995]]== |
|||
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article [[Quebec referendum, 1995]] you nominated for [[WP:GA|GA]]-status according to the [[WP:WIAGA|criteria]]. [[Image:Time2wait.svg|20px]] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:Coemgenus|Coemgenus]]</small> -- [[User:Coemgenus|Coemgenus]] ([[User talk:Coemgenus|talk]]) 18:20, 27 July 2015 (UTC) |
|||
You may use the above button to submit entries, or bookmark [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?action=edit&editintro=Wikipedia%3AWikiProject+Canada%2FThe+10%2C000+Challenge%2FEditintro&summary=added+article+to+challenge+list&title=Wikipedia%3AWikiProject+Canada%2FThe+10%2C000+Challenge%2FRecent+additions&create=Submit+an+article this link] for convenience. For more information, please see [[WP:CAN10K]]. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – [[User:Reidgreg|Reidgreg]] ([[User talk:Reidgreg|talk]]) 12:44, 18 October 2019 (UTC) |
|||
== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Quebec referendum, 1995]]== |
|||
The article [[Quebec referendum, 1995]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has been placed on hold [[Image:Symbol wait.svg|20px]]. The article is close to meeting the [[WP:GA?|good article criteria]], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See [[Talk:Quebec referendum, 1995]] for things which need to be addressed. <!-- Template:GANotice result=hold --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:Coemgenus|Coemgenus]]</small> -- [[User:Coemgenus|Coemgenus]] ([[User talk:Coemgenus|talk]]) 00:20, 9 August 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== ArbCom 2019 election voter message == |
|||
== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Quebec referendum, 1995]]== |
|||
The article [[Quebec referendum, 1995]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has passed [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]]; see [[Talk:Quebec referendum, 1995]] for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#To_nominate_an_article|nominate it]] to appear in Did you know.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:Coemgenus|Coemgenus]]</small> -- [[User:Coemgenus|Coemgenus]] ([[User talk:Coemgenus|talk]]) 12:21, 25 August 2015 (UTC) |
|||
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> |
|||
== Congrats on the "Good Article"== |
|||
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2019|2019 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019#Election_timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
I submitted the project to more or less mirror where possible the french version of the article on the "Projet Quebec" page to let people know what is going on. I anticipate the on rush of separatist trash talk and interference almost immediately judging from the fact they monitor my every comment with anonymous adding of harassing comments. Depending on how many paragraphs per topic, I suggest about a month per topic, including translation, amalgamation if more info exists on french version, and discussions. Everything will be done on the french discussion page. |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
Thanks again and congrats for your excellent and devoted work!!! --[[User:Dekk01|Dekk01]] ([[User talk:Dekk01|talk]]) 18:03, 25 August 2015 (UTC) |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2019/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC) |
|||
::Thank you, much appreciated. Anything I can do to help, just ask. [[User:Knoper|Knoper]] ([[User talk:Knoper#top|talk]]) 18:54, 25 August 2015 (UTC) |
|||
</td></tr> |
|||
</table> |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/05&oldid=926750390 --> |
|||
== ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message == |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for September 13== |
|||
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> |
|||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[New Democratic Party]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Balance of power]] ([http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/New_Democratic_Party check to confirm] | [http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/New_Democratic_Party fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> |
|||
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2020|2020 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 11:57, 13 September 2015 (UTC) |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC) |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for September 24== |
|||
</td></tr> |
|||
</table> |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/05&oldid=990308339 --> |
|||
== GA reassessment of 1995 Quebec referendum == |
|||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Jean Rougeau]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Union Nationale]] ([http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Jean_Rougeau check to confirm] | [http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Jean_Rougeau fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> |
|||
[[1995 Quebec referendum]] has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the [[Talk:1995 Quebec referendum/GA2|reassessment page]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 23:16, 21 October 2022 (UTC) |
|||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 11:10, 24 September 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message == |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for October 27== |
|||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> |
|||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Robert Stanfield]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Official Languages Act]] ([http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Robert_Stanfield check to confirm] | [http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Robert_Stanfield fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> |
|||
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div> |
|||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> |
|||
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2022|2022 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 11:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC) |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small> |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for November 3== |
|||
</div> |
|||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Meech Lake Accord]], you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages [[Shaw Centre]] and [[Fait Accompli]] ([http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Meech_Lake_Accord check to confirm] | [http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Meech_Lake_Accord fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> |
|||
</div> |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/04&oldid=1124425184 --> |
|||
== Good article reassessment for [[1995 Quebec referendum]] == |
|||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 10:45, 3 November 2015 (UTC) |
|||
[[1995 Quebec referendum]] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/1995 Quebec referendum/1|reassessment page]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 15:07, 8 February 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:I closed the individual GAR as "Keep - no consensus" and set this a community review page. As a participant in the previous discussion, you are invited to comment on the community review page. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 15:07, 8 February 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for November 12== |
|||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> |
|||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Republicanism in Canada]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Union Nationale]] ([http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Republicanism_in_Canada check to confirm] | [http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Republicanism_in_Canada fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> |
|||
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div> |
|||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> |
|||
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2023|2023 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 14:44, 12 November 2015 (UTC) |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small> |
|||
</div> |
|||
</div> |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/04&oldid=1187132222 --> |
|||
== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == |
|||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> |
|||
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div> |
|||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> |
|||
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2024|2024 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> |
|||
</div> |
|||
</div> |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/04&oldid=1258243549 --> |
Latest revision as of 00:27, 19 November 2024
Supply management
[edit]Hi. Thanks for your praise, and thanks to you too for your edits to Supply management! I appreciate your extensive editing and having a fresh set of eyes look at it, and in a great many places you improved my language, logic, or tone. I did undo or partially undo a handful of changes where I thought it best, but in every case I'm open to change or discussion. Cheers, Oreo Priest talk 15:45, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Referendum
[edit]My pleasure. I vaguely remembered the incident, but didn't have a source for it until I decided to actually tackle starting an article about Joyce Napier yesterday.
I am admittedly a little concerned that for the moment, it's being presented as sort of an isolated incident, where in reality there were some other significant media relations bungles, on both sides of the campaign, beyond just that one alone — going into a bit more depth about the tactical errors and backtracks on both sides, I think, would help significantly.
You're absolutely right about the decline of the community of interest on the topic, but I'm finding that to be a phenomenon right across the board for Wikipedia as a whole these days — there seem to be far less people around in 2015 than there used to be, and both maintenance and content projects are really suffering for it. (Just as an example, I find that when I initiate an AFD or CFD discussion now, it routinely has to get relisted for another week at least once, and sometimes twice, not because of actual debate or disagreement but for lack of anybody even participating in the discussion at all.) I'm a lot more worried about the longterm viability of Wikipedia now than I used to be, frankly. Bearcat (talk) 19:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Agreed Re backtracks, I intend to add quite a few more. Knoper (talk) 20:03, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Contact info
[edit]Hi, I'd like to get in touch with you, but not on your discussion page. I'm not super familiar with Wiki functions. I know I can message admins but can't seem to message you. Not sure if it's possible or I just forgot how. Thx :( --Dekk01 (talk) 20:30, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
- Hi there, if you'd like to send me an e-mail, go ahead and send it to jerseymacawesome@yahoo.ca Knoper (talk) 20:48, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Quebec referendum, 1995
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Quebec referendum, 1995 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Coemgenus -- Coemgenus (talk) 18:20, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Quebec referendum, 1995
[edit]The article Quebec referendum, 1995 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Quebec referendum, 1995 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Coemgenus -- Coemgenus (talk) 00:20, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Quebec referendum, 1995
[edit]The article Quebec referendum, 1995 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Quebec referendum, 1995 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Coemgenus -- Coemgenus (talk) 12:21, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Congrats on the "Good Article"
[edit]I submitted the project to more or less mirror where possible the french version of the article on the "Projet Quebec" page to let people know what is going on. I anticipate the on rush of separatist trash talk and interference almost immediately judging from the fact they monitor my every comment with anonymous adding of harassing comments. Depending on how many paragraphs per topic, I suggest about a month per topic, including translation, amalgamation if more info exists on french version, and discussions. Everything will be done on the french discussion page.
Thanks again and congrats for your excellent and devoted work!!! --Dekk01 (talk) 18:03, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you, much appreciated. Anything I can do to help, just ask. Knoper (talk) 18:54, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
December 2015
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Meech Lake Accord may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- was seen as Federal acquiescence to and, in the case of [[Lucien Bouchard]] and Louis Plamondon]], approval of Bill 178.{{sfn|Cohen|p=198}}
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:15, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi Knoper
[edit]Thank you for your feedback on my "Quebec referendum, 1995" edit. I have just read you user page. I will not be the "Quebec Sovereignist wikipedian" checking your "ideological blind spots" :) but maybe I will be one of them from time to time. I do not give much time to Wikipedia but I will continue to hang around now and then for years to come - French Wikipedia is such a disaster :( . It is so true that we all have blind spots. I personally think perfect objectivity does not exist and the only way to get closer to it is to listen to different points of view, weigh the best arguments from every sides and then only make up your mind. Humand brain is made of all kind of cognitive biases. If you are against Quebec separation, I will happily let your "ideological blind spots" challenge mine, as comparing arguments is essential (the only way?) to progress. Popol0707 (talk) 14:17, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
To You & To Knoper
[edit]The Quebec referendums are not about "sovereignty", they are about Communism. This web site specializes in exclusive English translations of non-publicized French-language documents, including the 1972 manifesto of the PARTI QUEBECOIS for a Communist State of Quebec: https://nosnowinmoscow.wordpress.com/ You can download that manifesto in a zip file in the sidebar (see the blue lightning). The zip contains a scan of the original French book, and a PDF of the exclusive English translation, along with photos of the French book on the shelf in the university law library.
The word "sovereignty" is a vague misnomer applied to conceal the real intentions behind the referendums, i.e., restructuring of all of Canada in post-Yes "negotiations". The word sovereignty is vague and deliberately misleading, because it means many things in different situations. The purpose of the Quebec referendums, however, is to [1] hijack the national legislative powers out of the Parliament in Ottawa, combine them with the Provincial legislative powers in the Quebec legislature at Quebec City, and then restructure Quebec on the model of MOSCOW, by devolving these powers into communist-style REGIONS, intended to become future international "multicultural" city-states when Canada and its Provinces are dissolved. This is not "sovereignty" for the French Canadians, it is a device to permanently remove the legislative sovereignty and self-government of the French Canadians as obtained in 1867 under the British North America Act 1867, and hand it over to multicultural expanded municipal entities on the one hand, and to new regional super-bodies on the other hand, the whole under a world government.
[2] The other purpose, and this is the main one, of the 1980 and 1995 referendums is to provide the federal level of Canada with a pretext to in fact "negotiate" the dismantling of Canada on the same model as the Communist model planned for Quebec. This is why Canada has the highest world intake of refugees and mass immigration.... all focused on the cities. At the end of the 1990s, the Ontario government created a mega-city out of Toronto by attaching outlying towns and villages. In 2000, the PARTI QUEBECOIS government created 5 megacities in Quebec, the two most notable being the "Greater Montreal REGION" and the expanded Quebec City REGION. These are basically proto-Soviet international city states, created as money-sucking monoliths as a pretext to have them DEMAND sovereign international powers and financial resources to RUN these new entities.... on the model of Moscow as described by Communist sociologist Morris Zeitlin in a 1975 issue of a journal of the Communist Party of the USA. In 2014, as a matter of FACT confirmable in the news, the mayors of the two megacities of Montreal and Quebec BOTH demanded international status together with powers and fiscal resources to run these REGIONS as international city states. That was Denis Coderre and Regis Lebeaume. That joint demand, widely broadcast in the news, in fact represents the recommended attack upon the Quebec legislature and the Parliament in Ottawa, as devised by Communist and Quebec city lawyer Guy Bertrand the 2014 edition of his French-only book, whose title in English would be "The Liberty-Nation Project" (see: https://nosnowinmoscow.wordpress.com/2015/12/10/communist-guy-bertrands-new-plan-to-smash-quebec-into-communist-regions-part-i/). Bertrand recommended that rather than a referendum on the style of 1980 and 1995, the third (and final) attack on Canada should be done through the megacities. He specifically recommended that both the Montreal and Quebec megacities should attack the Quebec legislature to remove its powers by demanding sovereign powers and fiscal resources for themselves. This would put CONTROL of the dismantling process at a different level than the referendums, which likely have been RIGGED by the way, although to no avail in 1995 because of a last-minute Canada rally in downtown Montreal which swelled the NO vote past the level of rigging they had thought was required to pull it off. It would place the destruction of Quebec and Canada into the hands of the MAYORS of the megacities, leaving nothing to the voters except a potential referendum to rubber-stamp the consequences, thus making it "look" "democratic".
Canada is being restructured for a Communist world-state.... but it is also a ZIONIST project, because in 1982 our lawful Constitution of 1867 and our lawful Parliamentary form of government were both replaced by Pierre Elliott Trudeau (a world-government leftist who led a Communist delegation at Moscow in 1952) and his pals from the Socialist International, i.e., the NDP. The new (illegal) constitution features Talmudic "balancing" or "proportionality" as its core feature at article 1 of the Charter, usually called the "Section 1 guarantee and limitation clause".
In addition, over the past 16-20 years, the French Canadian Code of Civil Procedure has been revised by the ruling PARTI QUEBECOIS and their fellow "LIBERALS" (the Liberals in fact set up the PQ from behind the scenes) to adopt Talmudic "balancing" and "proportionality", which has nothing to do with French Canadian law and culture, but is Zionist in nature.
Therefore, when you speak about Quebec "sovereignists" and the "ideology", the so-called "sovereignists" have no clue what is really going on or how they are being manipulated to dismantle and destroy their own government, and their own rights to self-determination established by Confederation. They have no clue the PQ is communist, and moreover, Communitarian, which is Communist-Zionist. The only way French Canadians can free themselves and prevent the rapidly encroaching loss of their real sovereignty in Confederation, is to wake up and throw out the Communists and the Zionists, and also throw out the phony federal Charter, which is a coup d'état, as admitted in 1982 by one of its chief architects, Jew Barry Lee Strayer, see an OCR of the document here:
https://patriationandlegitimacyofthecanadianconstitution.wordpress.com/
Your edits on issues like these will all depend on whether Wikipedia's role is to regurgitate mere opinions of manipulated "sovereignists" and headlines from the controlled news, or whether it prefers to deal with facts, such as those at the links above.
Kind regards.
Your GA nomination of Meech Lake Accord
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Meech Lake Accord you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 07:01, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Meech Lake Accord
[edit]The article Meech Lake Accord you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Meech Lake Accord for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 11:01, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Knoper. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Knoper. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Merger discussion for Kitchen Meeting
[edit]An article that you have been involved in editing—Kitchen Meeting—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Samuell Lift me up or put me down 01:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Knoper. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Lawyers and law students' signatures needed for Supreme Court amicus brief in favor of publishing the law
[edit]Hello, given your userbox I thought you might be interested in helping Carl Malamud's case for the public domain, crucial also for Wikisource: https://boingboing.net/2019/04/25/happy-law-day.html . Best regards, Nemo 21:06, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge third anniversary
[edit]The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its third-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and have no unsourced claims.
You may use the above button to submit entries, or bookmark this link for convenience. For more information, please see WP:CAN10K. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 12:44, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]GA reassessment of 1995 Quebec referendum
[edit]1995 Quebec referendum has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:16, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for 1995 Quebec referendum
[edit]1995 Quebec referendum has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- I closed the individual GAR as "Keep - no consensus" and set this a community review page. As a participant in the previous discussion, you are invited to comment on the community review page. Z1720 (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)