User talk:Sugeeth Jayaraj

Sugeeth Jayaraj, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sugeeth Jayaraj! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Girdawary moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Girdawary, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 16:05, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Girdawary

Hello, Sugeeth Jayaraj. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Girdawary".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:50, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cotyledonosis

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cotyledonosis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/21/3/348. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cabayi (talk) 06:27, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

• Quite apart from being copyvios, the above article and krimpsiekte were academic papers not Wikipedia articles. If you think these subjects are notable, you must take the time to write proper encyclopedia articles. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:17, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Sorry

I am not a fully experienced person in creating articles, This is just my third article on Wikipedia. Please forgive me if it is wrong to copy from other web pages. Thanks for warning me about it and please delete that article. Sugeeth Jayaraj (talk) 09:34, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Girdawary concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Girdawary, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Electric charge

I have reverted your goodwill edits to the article about Electric charge because:

• Your edits described charge to be a "basic property", which is not as accurate as describing charge to be a "physical property".
• It claimed charge to be a "basic property of electrons, protons and other subatomic particles", which is not incorrect, but it does not conclude that charge can be possessed by objects as a whole.
• It used the phrase "Law of Charges", which is apparently a paraphrase used to refer to Coulomb's law, but your text treats "Law of Charges" to be different from Coulomb's law.
• The text about neutrality was removed.
• It provided repetitive description of the properties of matter exhibiting positive and negative charge.

If you think that the aforementioned points do not justify my edits, please let me know. Ambuj Shukla 09:26, 12 December 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ambujshukla2004 (talk • contribs)

May 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Moon. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Please do not refer to it as Luna. You deleted the templates that told you not to and added a few sentences simply to call it Luna. puggo (talk) 14:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

See, I wrote it as Luna because a lot of astronomers refer to it as Luna now. Sugeeth Jayaraj (talk) 05:45, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:2003 UB313 near-infrared spectrum.png

A tag has been placed on File:2003 UB313 near-infrared spectrum.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CptViraj (talk) 16:58, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Girdawary

Hello, Sugeeth Jayaraj. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Girdawary".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:14, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Girdawary (December 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Girdawary may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 08:19, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

A Great Time for All!

I've joined Wikipedia over 3 years ago, and it has grown a lot since then. I took it as a passion to correct articles minorly, and thank you for everything. I've learnnt a lot from Wikipedia and also contributed a lot. It's great to be a part of the change.

Thanks! Sugeeth Jayaraj (talk) 06:30, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

MinervaNueue

Hi Sugeeth :) I saw your post on the Village Pump where you said you'd like to see the functionality of the MinervaNueue skin expanded. I work at the Wikimedia Foundation and my team is working on improvements to the mobile web experience (mostly through updates to the MinervaNueue skin) so I'd love to hear more about what you'd like to see changed or improved. What do you enjoy about the skin, and what's missing for you? Samwalton9 (WMF) (talk) 19:06, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

I enjoy the part where it is big enough to see, by default. The font and UI is great, and it’s basically better than the vector (2022) version! The experience puts the content at front, and it looks a lot more polished than all other skins on Wikipedia.

The parts where the experience needs improvement is where the functionality lies. It is usually hidden, but more could be added to the floating menu (which is like… the best part of the whole skin). I value functionality combined with aesthetics.

The templates can be better optimised for this skin though. (Mostly, let me be honest, it looks like they are slapped onto the page from other wiki skins.) I believe that it should look a lot more native, like adding curved corners to the templates, change the padding of it a bit, like on the sides, it looks like a bit offset from the main content. Yes, the templates should stand out, but, they should be a lot more integrated into the skin. It’s those little things, that just needs to be corrected. The same goes for the images as well, not all images seem to be properly optimised. Some look too small, even if they are in ‘4K’ quality. They should feel as… they were created for this UI…

This skin feels like a true effort into the Wikipedia User Experience, and over time, I look forward for it to become main experience. All users love a better focus on content, and the MinervaNeue looks like the best bet for the future of Wikipedia’s content. It also looks easy on the eyes, taking away most of the strain.

This is only the first of my three suggestions that I posted on the Village Pump, but I believe this is the most important of them all. The better optimised the content is, the better the user can focus and understand the content. Sugeeth Jayaraj (talk) 16:30, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

@Sugeeth Jayaraj: Thanks for sharing your thoughts and suggestions! When you say 'the floating menu' do you mean the sidebar which you can pull out from the left side of the screen? Also, we have some questions at Moderator Tools/Content moderation on mobile web/Diff about making improvements to diffs in MinervaNueue. If you have time to read that and let us know what you think I'd really appreciate it, it will help us figure out how to make the best design possible :) Samwalton9 (WMF) (talk) 10:19, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Yup, I'm talking about that sidebar.

For Question 1: What do you like or dislike about in-line and two-column diff views? Do you just want to use one of these, or should users be able to toggle between them?

A: Users should be able to toggle between both.

For Question 2: What other pages do you think should be linked from diffs?

A: Usually, it would be great if the list of added references can be in a separate section at the bottom.

For Question 3: What do you think of enabling editors to fully undo an edit more quickly, without needing to use the editor?

A: Please, let's do it the quicker way, instead of using the editor. But, let there be a popup dialog to confirm the action too. We don't want accidental reverts!

For the other questions, I'll think and respond as soon as possible :) Sugeeth Jayaraj (talk) 14:44, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, much appreciated :) Samwalton9 (WMF) (talk) 12:43, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Sugeeth Jayaraj!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:38, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

May 2023

Your edit to Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:24, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Hey there, @Diannaa! I totally get where you're coming from, and I want to address your concern. Let's dive right into it.

First off, I want to highlight that the link you shared actually copied information from Microsoft. [Here's the link - Deprecation of Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool (MSDT) and MSDT Troubleshooters | Microsoft Support] But fear not, my dear friend, because the words I used were definitely not the same. I put my own spin on them, adding my personal touch and understanding. Trust me, it's a blast!

Oh, and before I forget, let me mention that I took the responsibility of both the Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool and the article about Basil Seeds recently. These articles are super important in their respective domains, and I wanted to give them the attention they deserve.

Let's talk troubleshooters for a sec. We use them every single day to fix those pesky problems that would otherwise take forever to tackle. So it's absolutely crucial that the MSDT platform gets the recognition it deserves.

Now, onto Basil seeds! These little fellas are renowned worldwide for their incredible uses in faloodas, medicine, and so much more. They're like global celebrities, especially in the US and Asia. And let me tell you, as an Indian, Basil seeds are a big deal in my everyday life!

But here's the kicker: Wikipedia, the ultimate hub of free and original information, only had three measly paragraphs about the MSDT and a measly two sentences about "Basil Seeds." Can you believe it? I was flabbergasted! So, I decided to step up my game and contribute to these two articles in a major way.

I want you to know that I'm well aware of the copyright rules, thanks to a little mishap I had with an article called "Girdawary" four years ago. Lesson learned, my friend! I've since honed my skills and treaded cautiously when it comes to copyrighted content. I prefer putting things in my own words, adding that extra touch of creativity!

You see, I'm just a school student, and time is a precious commodity for me. That's why I usually contribute to Wikipedia in "phases." It takes a little longer, but hey, Rome wasn't built in a day, right?

Now, when it comes to copyright, I have a pretty solid understanding. Facts and information themselves can't be copyrighted. It's the presentation style and one's own creative magic that can be subject to copyright. But hey, correct me if I'm wrong, because I'm always eager to learn and grow!

So here's my request: could you pretty please restore the content of the 07:32, May 22, 2023 revision under the "retirement" section? I truly believe that my concern and reasoning are valid, and I'd be over the moon if you agree. But if I'm mistaken, don't worry, I won't be bummed out. Just explain the reason why my content (the stuff I poured my heart and soul into) is subject to copyright. I'm all ears, ready to learn and become an even better Wikipedia contributor in the future!

Thanks a million for understanding, Diannaa. And please, oh please, forgive me if I've taken up too much of your precious time. You're a rockstar for listening to me this far! - Sugeeth Jayaraj (talk) 19:16, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)