User talk:PackMecEng: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
PackMecEng (talk | contribs) OneClickArchived "Antifa" to User talk:PackMecEng/Archive 6 |
|||
| (20 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{archive box|auto=yes}} |
{{archive box|auto=yes}} |
||
== Invitation to participate in a research == |
|||
== User:Adoring_nanny’s essay on Lab leaks. == |
|||
Hello |
Hello, |
||
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this '''[https://wikimediafoundation.limesurvey.net/962595?lang=en anonymous survey]'''. |
|||
Would you please further explain your revert [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User%3AAdoring_nanny%2FEssays%2FLab_Leak_Likely&diff=1165093692&oldid=1165090308 here]. “Not needed just yet, please see the recent afd”. |
|||
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. |
|||
What is your interest in this essay, or [[User:Adoring nanny]]? |
|||
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its [[m:Special:MyLanguage/Research:Wikipedia Administrator Recruitment, Retention, and Attrition|Meta page]] and view its [[wmf:Special:MyLanguage/Legal:Administrator Experiences 2024 Survey Privacy Statement|privacy statement]] . |
|||
What is your criteria for “needed”? If not “just yet”, then when? Do you know the difference between mfd and afd? You did not participate in the mfd, so why the interest now and not during the mfd? |
|||
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. |
|||
- [[User:SmokeyJoe|SmokeyJoe]] ([[User talk:SmokeyJoe|talk]]) 23:31, 12 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Kind Regards, |
|||
:{{Reply|SmokeyJoe}} I admit that I did participate in the MFD discussion[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Adoring_nanny/Essays/Lab_Leak_Likely_(2nd_nomination)&diff=prev&oldid=1164252665], but I experienced a momentary lapse in recalling the meaning of the three-letter acronyms involved. However, upon reflection, I failed to perceive a clear consensus to blank the page during that MFD, nor did I personally find significant value in doing so. The notion of blanking the page struck me as akin to engaging in grave dancing, which left me with reservations about supporting such an action. It's important to carefully consider the implications and potential ramifications before making decisions that involve altering or removing content, particularly when it comes to topics that hold significance or have historical context. [[User:PackMecEng|PackMecEng]] ([[User talk:PackMecEng#top|talk]]) 23:39, 12 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::I don’t claim a clear consensus that it should be blanked. Instead, it is my judgement as a single editor that it is better blanked. A single edit is not a dance. Taking it to MfD for a formal community discussion would be a dance. I believe that I sufficiently considered implications and ramifications, and my judgement is that all are lessened by the content being blanked without ceremony. If the user becomes unblocked, without a topic ban on the topic, they would be free to unblank. [[User:SmokeyJoe|SmokeyJoe]] ([[User talk:SmokeyJoe|talk]]) 08:50, 13 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
[[mw:Special:MyLanguage/Wikimedia Research|WMF Research Team]] |
|||
== You know that you shouldn't troll == |
|||
<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[[User:BGerdemann (WMF)|BGerdemann (WMF)]] ([[User talk:BGerdemann (WMF)|talk]]) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi> |
|||
I know [[User:Abecedare]] commented at the discussion, but I think it should be on the record here. I'm referring to [[Special:Diff/1165991959]] where you say to Bishonen "*:Ha, did you stick out your tongue at the end as well?". [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 15:57, 23 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Potential_Admins&oldid=27650229 --> |
|||
== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == |
|||
:@[[User:Doug Weller|Doug Weller]] Thanks for stopping by! I think everything that needs to be said about it has been said at the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrative_action_review#Unblock_of_Tony1_by_Bishonen admin review board]. I understand you do not like the answers there and that is okay. It was not trolling but expressing dismay at the admin action, as others have mentioned. Now I get it, you, BMK, and Abecedare are good friends of Bish, but it was simply not trolling, neither was my comment at the review board. Was the unblock within admin discursion? Sure, no one is questioning that. Was it smart and was the rational lacking? I, and others think so. Lets all move on with lesions learned here. Have a good one! [[User:PackMecEng|PackMecEng]] ([[User talk:PackMecEng#top|talk]]) 16:05, 23 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::I suppose your comments directed at Bishonen had nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that she blocked you a few years back, your very first block (at least under this account name). [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 18:17, 23 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> |
|||
:::@[[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] Correct! Also nice [[WP:ASPERSIONS|aspersion]]. [[User:PackMecEng|PackMecEng]] ([[User talk:PackMecEng#top|talk]]) 18:26, 23 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div> |
|||
::::Not an aspersion, just bringing a fact to light for those who hadn't yet checked your (very modest) block log. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 18:29, 23 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> |
|||
:::::@[[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] The aspersion is you accusing me of being a sock. [[User:PackMecEng|PackMecEng]] ([[User talk:PackMecEng#top|talk]]) 18:31, 23 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2024|2024 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
::::::I accused you of nothing. I simply don't know the history of your editing -- and there are numerous legitimate reasons why an editor might have moved from one account to another. I suggest that you stop looking for ulterior motives and simply take what I write at face value, that would help reduce any misunderstandings between us. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 18:50, 23 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::@[[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] No, that is a classic aspersion. Please stop. kthxbye! [[User:PackMecEng|PackMecEng]] ([[User talk:PackMecEng#top|talk]]) 18:54, 23 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
::::::::Whatever. Toodle-loo, Captain Q. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 19:32, 23 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> |
|||
</div> |
|||
</div> |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1258243594 --> |
|||
Latest revision as of 22:37, 19 November 2024
Invitation to participate in a research
[edit]Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)