Talk:Colombia: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 13:31, 20 November 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Colombia article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4: 3 months

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Colombia was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 9, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 20, 2004, July 20, 2005, July 20, 2006, July 20, 2007, July 20, 2008, July 20, 2009, July 20, 2010, July 20, 2011, July 20, 2012, July 20, 2014, July 20, 2015, July 20, 2016, July 20, 2017, and July 20, 2018.

Countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry articles

WikiProject Countries to-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Check out the article alerts; see if anything catches your fancy.
Cleanup : clean-up listing for Countries
Stubs : de-stub articles in Category:Stubs by region.
Other : add {{WPCountries}} to talk pages of related articles, and assess.

Colombia Top‑importance

	Colombia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Colombia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Colombia-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ColombiaWikipedia:WikiProject ColombiaTemplate:WikiProject ColombiaColombia articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

South America High‑importance

	Latin America portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Latin America Top‑importance

	Latin America portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Latin AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Latin AmericaLatin America articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 4 August 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change {{About|the country|its predecessor|Gran Colombia|other uses|Colombia (disambiguation)|uses of "Columbia"|Columbia (disambiguation)|the city|Colombo}} to {{About|the country|its predecessor|Gran Colombia|other uses|Colombia (disambiguation)|the city in Sri Lanka|Colombo|a different spelling of this term|Columbia}}

Reasoning: I find it confusing, and others could as well. Ṫḧïṡ ṁëṡṡäġë ḧäṡ ḅëëṅ ḅṛöüġḧẗ ẗö ÿöü ḅÿ ᗰOᗪ ᑕᖇEᗩTOᖇ 🏡 🗨 📝 04:30, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Remsense诉 04:55, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 August 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change the data that the population was 6 to 12 million before conquest to 6 to 7 million before conquest per the most accepted figure given Teotzin190 (talk) 01:00, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The actual sources give no mention of a “10 million” population, the one in the graph showed 7 million and the other said 6 million Teotzin190 (talk) 04:37, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question: The first and fifth graphs in the attached source show a high estimate (E3) of 12 million in 1500. Remsense诉 05:26, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for responding, there are differing estimates on the population where it goes from as low as 3 million in E1 to as high as 12 in E3 million but the E2 gave an average estimate of 7 million which works better as a neutral number which I think should replace the apparently “10 million” data that whoever made the article put in as it is also supported by another cite that says 6 million. Teotzin190 (talk) 05:34, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, it would seem clear enough from the phrasing (which I've copyedited) that the 12 million figure is the highest estimate in a range of them. We should generally be wary of "averaging" (or selecting an average) of what we consider to be the polar viewpoints on Wikipedia, lest we accidentally select a non-representative estimate. Remsense诉 05:38, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, tweaked it more. Remsense诉 05:51, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you mention that the middle estimate is around 6-7 million, supported by graph E2 of the cite where 7 million is given and a source published by Jaime Jaramillo Uribe in 1989 where an estimate of 6 million is given? Teotzin190 (talk) 05:56, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My only worry would be that 6–7 is not attested as the most common range per se, but I would very much like to add a sentence to that effect, as the total range is quite large and a narrower majority range should be mentioned if it's sourceable. Are there any surveys you could point me to that say this is the range containing a majority of estimates, or something like that? If not, I could just list the four estimates individually. Remsense诉 05:59, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are very few sources on the matter but three support the 6-7 million range: one cited as Juan Friede (1966). Invasión del país de los chibchas. Santa Fe de Bogotá: Ediciones Tercer Mundo, pp. 19, another cited as Jaime Jaramillo Uribe (1989). Ensayos de historia social: La sociedad neogranadina. Santa Fe de Bogotá: Tercer Mundo, pp. 87. And the E2 chart of the source that’s currently being used. The first two are books. Teotzin190 (talk) 06:11, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you tell me the page number in Jaramillo Uribe 1989 that gives the 6 million figure? I can't find it with my limited Spanish abilities. Remsense诉 06:33, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How is that? Thank you for your patience.

Remsense诉 06:13, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is good, thank you. Teotzin190 (talk) 06:15, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help, thanks for reaching out! Remsense诉 06:17, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Atlantic and Pacific coastlines

It says that "It is the only country in South America with coastlines (and islands) along both the Atlantic and Pacific oceans", but Chile also has coastlines on both oceans, doesn't it? Fangfabio (talk) 13:44, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 6 October 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

replace the word 'football' with 'fútbol' 2601:CF:837F:C3E0:B49D:1CDF:9B1E:48FC (talk) 15:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Common English spelling used. CMD (talk) 16:27, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Animation of map

The animation of the historical map would disturb some people. It doesn't meet the accessibility guidelines of the manual style which recommends animations should be under user control (or only run once). I am not technically proficient enough to modify it so I ask another editor to do so. Humpster (talk) 04:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Humphrey Tribble, I think I spoke to you before on Three body problem—since then, I decided the lazy way was sufficient: the results are fine when I convert GIFs directly to videos and reupload them. Should I write a little essay explaining how to do this? Remsense ‥ 论 04:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think a step-by-step guide would be useful Remsense (talk · contribs). I might be able to do some conversions myself, but if not I can point other editors to the procedure. Thank you. Humpster (talk) 04:58, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will put it on my list and get it out ASAP. Remsense ‥ 论 04:59, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 }}
 {{WikiProject banner shell|class = B|vital=yes|1 =
-{{WikiProject Countries
+{{WikiProject Countries}}
-}}
 {{WikiProject Colombia|importance=Top}}
 {{WikiProject South America|importance=High}}
@@ Line 41: / Line 40: @@
 }}
-== Semi-protected edit request on 14 October 2023 ==
+== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 4 August 2024 ==
-{{Edit semi-protected|Colombia|answered=yes}}
-Request the two mentions of Air Force be changed to Aerospace Force to reflect the new name of the [[Colombian Aerospace Force]]. Page has already been moved. [[Special:Contributions/75.163.131.46|75.163.131.46]] ([[User talk:75.163.131.46|talk]]) 16:36, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
-:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp -->  [[User:GoingBatty|GoingBatty]] ([[User talk:GoingBatty|talk]]) 13:51, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
-== Mestizo-White ==
-The "Mestizo-White" label wouldnt be acuratte as the govenrment does not specify the number as being mestizo white, and it doesnt include minority groups such as mulatto or east asian. It would be best to keep it as "no ethnic affiliation" as its presented in other pages relating to this topic. This is also because the colombian government doesn't collect data on specifically mestizos or whites instead counting afro and indigenous colombians. [[User talk:Moxy|Moxy]]. [[User:Zaquezipe|Zaquezipe]] ([[User talk:Zaquezipe|talk]]) 12:30, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
-:Source? [[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 12:35, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
-::Looks  like this was done all over https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/colombia/ <span style="font-weight:bold;color:darkblue">[[User:Moxy|Moxy]]</span>-[[File:Maple Leaf (Pantone).svg|15px|link=User talk:Moxy]] 14:16, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
-:::So maybe change it to "Mestizo and White" ? [[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 14:21, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
-::::Agree we should follow the source https://cers.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/97/2016/04/Multicultural-harmony-in-Colombia-Beth-Brady.pdf <span style="font-weight:bold;color:darkblue">[[User:Moxy|Moxy]]</span>-[[File:Maple Leaf (Pantone).svg|15px|link=User talk:Moxy]] 14:26, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
-::https://geoportal.dane.gov.co/servicios/atlas-estadistico/src/Tomo_I_Demografico/3.4.-poblaci%C3%B3n-por-grupos-%C3%A9tnicos.html is how tha government labels the ethnic groups [[User:Zaquezipe|Zaquezipe]] ([[User talk:Zaquezipe|talk]]) 15:22, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
-:::The problem is that as this does not define who , 85.9% are (outside of "no ethnicity") this is not much help. This does not support your edit of white, rather it would support "no identified ethnicity", but even then, this is one source. [[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 15:43, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
-::::OK, can I make the change of changing "Human ethnicity and biological diversity" to "Race and ethnicity in Colombia", as that is the name of the article and the previous one is an unnecessary rewording. [[User:Zaquezipe|Zaquezipe]] ([[User talk:Zaquezipe|talk]]) 15:51, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
-:::::We do to have a section titled that. If you want to change the name of a page you need to make a case at that article, not here. [[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 15:54, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
-== Semi-protected edit request on 18 February 2024 ==
-{{edit semi-protected|Colombia|answered=yes}}
-Request to add [[Mass media in Colombia ]] under [[Colombia #Culture]]. [[Special:Contributions/203.149.142.34|203.149.142.34]] ([[User talk:203.149.142.34|talk]]) 10:59, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
-:[[File:Pictogram voting question.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Question:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> what are we supposed to do with the article's title? [[User:M.Bitton|M.Bitton]] ([[User talk:M.Bitton|talk]]) 01:27, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
-:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> Already linked under [[Colombia#Popular culture]]. <br />— [[User:Urropean|Urro]]<sup>[[User_talk:Urropean|<nowiki>[</nowiki>''talk''<nowiki>]</nowiki>]][[Special:Contributions/Urropean|<nowiki>[</nowiki>''edits''<nowiki>]</nowiki>]]</sup> ⋮  14:02, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
-== Semi-protected edit request on 12 March 2024 ==
-{{edit semi-protected|Colombia|answered=y}}
-Recommend adding "." to caption after "on the continent" for consistency. [[User:RCM741989|RCM741989]] ([[User talk:RCM741989|talk]]) 16:22, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
-:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> Sincerely, [[User:Guessitsavis|Guessitsavis]] (she/they) ([[User talk:Guessitsavis|Talk]]) 13:35, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
+{{Edit extended-protected|Colombia|answered=yes}}
-== Incorrect statement on economy ==
+Change ''<nowiki>{{About|the country|its predecessor|Gran Colombia|other uses|Colombia (disambiguation)|uses of "Columbia"|Columbia (disambiguation)|the city|Colombo}}</nowiki>'' to ''<nowiki>{{About|the country|its predecessor|Gran Colombia|other uses|Colombia (disambiguation)|the city in Sri Lanka|Colombo|a different spelling of this term|Columbia}}</nowiki>''
+Reasoning: I find it confusing, and others could as well. Ṫḧïṡ ṁëṡṡäġë ḧäṡ ḅëëṅ ḅṛöüġḧẗ ẗö ÿöü ḅÿ ᗰOᗪ ᑕᖇEᗩTOᖇ [[User:Mod creator|🏡]] [[User talk:Mod creator|🗨]] [[Special:Contributions/Mod creator|📝]] 04:30, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
-I'd edit this myself but the page is locked.
+:{{done}}<!-- Template:EEp --> [[User:Remsense|<span style="border-radius:2px 0 0 2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F;color:#fff">'''Remsense'''</span>]][[User talk:Remsense|<span lang="zh" style="border:1px solid #1E816F;border-radius:0 2px 2px 0;padding:1px 3px;color:#000">诉</span>]] 04:55, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
+== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 August 2024 ==
-The economy section asserts that "Colombia is now one of only three economies with a perfect score on the strength of legal rights index". The World Bank source PDF it cites is no longer there, but looks to be out of date anyway (2017).
+{{Edit extended-protected|Colombia|answered=yes}}
-According to my own research at
+Change the data that the population was 6 to 12 million before conquest to 6 to 7 million before conquest per the most accepted figure given [[User:Teotzin190|Teotzin190]] ([[User talk:Teotzin190|talk]]) 01:00, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
-https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IC.LGL.CRED.XQ?most_recent_value_desc=true&locations=CO , Colombia has never had a perfect score. It peaked at 11 out of 12.
-There are (and have been) countries that do have a perfect score, for example New Zealand. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IC.LGL.CRED.XQ?most_recent_value_desc=true&locations=NZ [[User:Onetruedave|Onetruedave]] ([[User talk:Onetruedave|talk]]) 14:56, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
+:The actual sources give no mention of a “10 million” population, the one in the graph showed 7 million and the other said 6 million [[User:Teotzin190|Teotzin190]] ([[User talk:Teotzin190|talk]]) 04:37, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
+:[[File:Pictogram voting question.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Question:'''<!-- Template:EEp --> The first and fifth graphs in the attached source show a high estimate (E3) of 12 million in 1500.  [[User:Remsense|<span style="border-radius:2px 0 0 2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F;color:#fff">'''Remsense'''</span>]][[User talk:Remsense|<span lang="zh" style="border:1px solid #1E816F;border-radius:0 2px 2px 0;padding:1px 3px;color:#000">诉</span>]] 05:26, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
+::Thank you for responding, there are differing estimates on the population where it goes from as low as 3 million in E1 to as high as 12 in E3 million but the E2 gave an average estimate of 7 million which works better as a neutral number which I think should replace the apparently “10 million” data that whoever made the article put in as it is also supported by another cite that says 6 million. [[User:Teotzin190|Teotzin190]] ([[User talk:Teotzin190|talk]]) 05:34, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
+:::In my opinion, it would seem clear enough from the phrasing (which I've copyedited) that the 12 million figure is the highest estimate in a range of them. We should generally be wary of "averaging" (or selecting an average) of what we consider to be the polar viewpoints on Wikipedia, lest we accidentally select a non-representative estimate. [[User:Remsense|<span style="border-radius:2px 0 0 2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F;color:#fff">'''Remsense'''</span>]][[User talk:Remsense|<span lang="zh" style="border:1px solid #1E816F;border-radius:0 2px 2px 0;padding:1px 3px;color:#000">诉</span>]] 05:38, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
+::::Sorry, tweaked it more. [[User:Remsense|<span style="border-radius:2px 0 0 2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F;color:#fff">'''Remsense'''</span>]][[User talk:Remsense|<span lang="zh" style="border:1px solid #1E816F;border-radius:0 2px 2px 0;padding:1px 3px;color:#000">诉</span>]] 05:51, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
+:::::Can you mention that the middle estimate is around 6-7 million, supported by graph E2 of the cite where 7 million is given and a source published by Jaime Jaramillo Uribe in 1989 where an estimate of 6 million is given? [[User:Teotzin190|Teotzin190]] ([[User talk:Teotzin190|talk]]) 05:56, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
+::::::My only worry would be that 6–7 is not attested as the most common range per se, but I would very much like to add a sentence to that effect, as the total range is quite large and a narrower majority range should be mentioned if it's sourceable. Are there any surveys you could point me to that say this is the range containing a majority of estimates, or something like that? If not, I could just list the four estimates individually. [[User:Remsense|<span style="border-radius:2px 0 0 2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F;color:#fff">'''Remsense'''</span>]][[User talk:Remsense|<span lang="zh" style="border:1px solid #1E816F;border-radius:0 2px 2px 0;padding:1px 3px;color:#000">诉</span>]] 05:59, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
+:::::::There are very few sources on the matter but three support the 6-7 million range: one cited as Juan Friede (1966). ''Invasión del país de los chibchas''. Santa Fe de Bogotá: Ediciones Tercer Mundo, pp. 19, another cited as Jaime Jaramillo Uribe (1989). ''Ensayos de historia social: La sociedad neogranadina''. Santa Fe de Bogotá: Tercer Mundo, pp. 87. And the E2 chart of the source that’s currently being used. The first two are books. [[User:Teotzin190|Teotzin190]] ([[User talk:Teotzin190|talk]]) 06:11, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
+::::::::Could you tell me the page number in Jaramillo Uribe 1989 that gives the 6 million figure? I can't find it with my limited Spanish abilities. [[User:Remsense|<span style="border-radius:2px 0 0 2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F;color:#fff">'''Remsense'''</span>]][[User talk:Remsense|<span lang="zh" style="border:1px solid #1E816F;border-radius:0 2px 2px 0;padding:1px 3px;color:#000">诉</span>]] 06:33, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
+:::::::How is that? Thank you for your patience. <abbr title="Smiling face" style="border-bottom: none;">[[File:Face-smile.svg|18px|link=]]</abbr> [[User:Remsense|<span style="border-radius:2px 0 0 2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F;color:#fff">'''Remsense'''</span>]][[User talk:Remsense|<span lang="zh" style="border:1px solid #1E816F;border-radius:0 2px 2px 0;padding:1px 3px;color:#000">诉</span>]] 06:13, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
+::::::::I think it is good, thank you. [[User:Teotzin190|Teotzin190]] ([[User talk:Teotzin190|talk]]) 06:15, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
+:::::::::Glad to help, thanks for reaching out! [[User:Remsense|<span style="border-radius:2px 0 0 2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F;color:#fff">'''Remsense'''</span>]][[User talk:Remsense|<span lang="zh" style="border:1px solid #1E816F;border-radius:0 2px 2px 0;padding:1px 3px;color:#000">诉</span>]] 06:17, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
-== Vandalism in Ethnic groups ==
+== Atlantic and Pacific coastlines ==
+It says that "It is the only country in South America with coastlines (and islands) along both the [[Caribbean natural region|Atlantic]] and [[Pacific/Chocó natural region|Pacific]] oceans", but Chile also has coastlines on both oceans, doesn't it? [[User:Fangfabio|Fangfabio]] ([[User talk:Fangfabio|talk]]) 13:44, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
-User: @[[User:ElMexicanotres|ElMexicanotres]] has been reverting for several editions without any reason, deleting information from important portals such as [[The World Factbook|CIA]] and [[PLOS|Public Library of Science]] trying to preserve obsolete genetic information from the 90s and 2000s compared to years like 2014, 2016 and 2018. Please do a review and a response soon. @[[User:Citationbot|citationbot]] @[[User:Maxeto0910|Maxeto0910]]. [[User:Jhoan Batipse|Jhoan Batipse]] ([[User talk:Jhoan Batipse|talk]]) 05:11, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
+== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 6 October 2024 ==
-:No I am deleting all of the genetic information because it is not needed you provided proof that there is conflicting evidence between them so it’s best not to add it here and to a different Wikipedia page and I am saying you add it to [[Race and ethnicity in Colombia]] where it does show ethnographic studies [[User:ElMexicanotres|ElMexicanotres]] ([[User talk:ElMexicanotres|talk]]) 05:12, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
-::You say that there cannot be genetic sources when there was an old source from 2010 there for a long time, but you do not eliminate it, you eliminate the sources of important portals such as [[PLOS]] of 2016 and 2018. Then you say that the sampled population is small, so I put one of more than 1,600 Colombians and even then you say that it should not go there. Can you explain me? [[User:Jhoan Batipse|Jhoan Batipse]] ([[User talk:Jhoan Batipse|talk]]) 05:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
-:::Yes I checked the name of the section and it has to do with number of ethnic groups nothing to do with the genetic studies of a country and because there are so many conflicting sources to the genetic information it’s best not to add it and maybe to place it somewhere else where both of the information can be seen, the one from 2010 and the one from 2018. [[User:ElMexicanotres|ElMexicanotres]] ([[User talk:ElMexicanotres|talk]]) 05:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
-::::Now you are changing the situation in your favor, when the first thing you removed was in favor of a genetic study from 2010 with data from 2000, 2003 and 2007. That is why I told you: it is vandalism because there was a genetic source that It was maintained for a long time (even with a circular diagram). I know that all the sources of genetic studies are on the main page, but then do not play to your convenience, if from the beginning you disagreed with genetic information you should delete and explain the situation. [[User:Jhoan Batipse|Jhoan Batipse]] ([[User talk:Jhoan Batipse|talk]]) 05:29, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
-:::::That is because there are two conflicting sources with almost equal amount of people, if you really want to add it so bad then stop insisting on having it on the main page but instead on the [[Race and ethnicity in Colombia]] page which I have shown you multiple times yet you continue to ignore it and keep reverting the deletion. [[User:ElMexicanotres|ElMexicanotres]] ([[User talk:ElMexicanotres|talk]]) 05:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
-:::::Ok, so I examined each of the sources. The 2018 one states “Understanding the Hidden Complexity of Latin American Population Isolates” and uses columbians from solely one state being antioquia which for obvious reasons isn’t suitable for showing as representative of an entire nation because it’s showing genetic isolates, not the common citizen of columbia. The 2015 one uses very isolated native groups for calculating native dna and not ones most present in columbia which explains why it’s not so accurate for the country, because columbians have little in common with the isolated groups which is why it’s not suitable for using. The 2014 one has purple dots over mostly antioquia (seems to be the most European state from Colombia which fits the 2010 observation of antioquia being 70% white) which also makes it not representative of the country because it focuses on one state. The 2010 one is better because it includes the specific states and their ancestries rather than focusing on a specific state, it has more people than all of the other ones, and it uses the most common native groups for their areas, and it examines all columbian ethnic groups and citizens of urban areas of the country. [[User:ElMexicanotres|ElMexicanotres]] ([[User talk:ElMexicanotres|talk]]) 20:17, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
+{{Edit extended-protected|Colombia|answered=yes}}
-:I don't understand exactly what the conflict here is, but I think both of you may be in danger of being blocked per [[WP:3RR]], and to avoid that, you need to keep discussion about the content here in Talk. [[User:StefenTower|<span style="color: green;">'''Stefen <span style="white-space: nowrap;">Tower<sub>s among the rest!</sub></span>'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:StefenTower|Gab]] • [[Special:Contributions/StefenTower|Gruntwerk]]</sup> 06:39, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
+replace the word 'football' with 'fútbol' [[Special:Contributions/2601:CF:837F:C3E0:B49D:1CDF:9B1E:48FC|2601:CF:837F:C3E0:B49D:1CDF:9B1E:48FC]] ([[User talk:2601:CF:837F:C3E0:B49D:1CDF:9B1E:48FC|talk]]) 15:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
-::It is a dispute over the quality of studies about genetic ancestry in Colombia. –[[User:LaundryPizza03|<b style="color:#77b">Laundry</b><b style="color:#fb0">Pizza</b><b style="color:#b00">03</b>]] ([[User talk:LaundryPizza03|<span style="color:#0d0">d</span>]][[Special:Contribs/LaundryPizza03|<span style="color:#0bf">c̄</span>]]) 23:00, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
+:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:EEp --> Common English spelling used. [[User:Chipmunkdavis|CMD]] ([[User talk:Chipmunkdavis|talk]]) 16:27, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
-::List of sources:
-::* Older source, preferred by {{user|ElMexicanotres}}:
-::** {{cite journal |last1=Rojas |first1=Winston |last2=Parra |first2=María Victoria |last3=Campo |first3=Omer |last4=Caro |first4=María Antonieta |last5=Lopera |first5=Juan Guillermo |last6=Arias |first6=William |last7=Duque |first7=Constanza |last8=Naranjo |first8=Andrés |last9=García |first9=Jharley |last10=Vergara |first10=Candelaria |last11=Lopera |first11=Jaime |last12=Hernandez |first12=Erick |last13=Valencia |first13=Ana |last14=Caicedo |first14=Yuri |last15=Cuartas |first15=Mauricio |last16=Gutiérrez |first16=Javier |last17=López |first17=Sergio |last18=Ruiz-Linares |first18=Andrés |last19=Bedoya |first19=Gabriel |title=Genetic make up and structure of Colombian populations by means of uniparental and biparental DNA markers |journal=American Journal of Physical Anthropology |date=September 2010 |volume=143 |issue=1 |pages=13–20 |doi=10.1002/ajpa.21270 |pmid=20734436 |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/45822469 |access-date=13 February 2024}}
-::* Sources preferred by {{user|Jhoan Baptise}}:
-::** {{Cite journal |last1=Ruiz-Linares |first1=Andrés |last2=Adhikari |first2=Kaustubh |last3=Acuña-Alonzo |first3=Victor |last4=Quinto-Sanchez |first4=Mirsha |last5=Jaramillo |first5=Claudia |last6=Arias |first6=William |last7=Fuentes |first7=Macarena |last8=Pizarro |first8=María |last9=Everardo |first9=Paola |last10=de Avila |first10=Francisco |last11=Gómez-Valdés |first11=Jorge |last12=León-Mimila |first12=Paola |last13=Hunemeier |first13=Tábita |last14=Ramallo |first14=Virginia |last15=Silva de Cerqueira |first15=Caio C. |date=2014-09-25 |title=Admixture in Latin America: Geographic Structure, Phenotypic Diversity and Self-Perception of Ancestry Based on 7,342 Individuals |journal=PLOS Genetics |volume=10 |issue=9 |pages=e1004572 |doi=10.1371/journal.pgen.1004572 |doi-access=free |issn=1553-7390 |pmc=4177621 |pmid=25254375}}
-::** {{Cite journal |last1=Homburger |first1=Julian R. |last2=Moreno-Estrada |first2=Andrés |last3=Gignoux |first3=Christopher R. |last4=Nelson |first4=Dominic |last5=Sanchez |first5=Elena |last6=Ortiz-Tello |first6=Patricia |last7=Pons-Estel |first7=Bernardo A. |last8=Acevedo-Vasquez |first8=Eduardo |last9=Miranda |first9=Pedro |last10=Langefeld |first10=Carl D. |last11=Gravel |first11=Simon |last12=Alarcón-Riquelme |first12=Marta E. |last13=Bustamante |first13=Carlos D. |date=2015-12-04 |title=Genomic Insights into the Ancestry and Demographic History of South America |journal=PLOS Genetics |volume=11 |issue=12 |pages=e1005602 |doi=10.1371/journal.pgen.1005602 |doi-access=free |issn=1553-7390 |pmc=4670080 |pmid=26636962}}
-::** {{Cite journal |last1=Mooney |first1=Jazlyn A. |last2=Huber |first2=Christian D. |last3=Service |first3=Susan |last4=Sul |first4=Jae Hoon |last5=Marsden |first5=Clare D. |last6=Zhang |first6=Zhongyang |last7=Sabatti |first7=Chiara |last8=Ruiz-Linares |first8=Andrés |last9=Bedoya |first9=Gabriel |last10=Endophenotypes |first10=Costa Rica/Colombia Consortium for Genetic Investigation of Bipolar |last11=Freimer |first11=Nelson |last12=Lohmueller |first12=Kirk E. |date=2018-11-11 |title=Understanding the Hidden Complexity of Latin American Population Isolates |journal=American Journal of Human Genetics |language=en |volume=103 |issue=5 |pages=707–726 |doi=10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.09.013 |pmid=30401458|pmc=6218714 }}
-::–[[User:LaundryPizza03|<b style="color:#77b">Laundry</b><b style="color:#fb0">Pizza</b><b style="color:#b00">03</b>]] ([[User talk:LaundryPizza03|<span style="color:#0d0">d</span>]][[Special:Contribs/LaundryPizza03|<span style="color:#0bf">c̄</span>]]) 09:43, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
-::Now that the page is extended-confirmed protected, I have no choice but to start an RfC. –[[User:LaundryPizza03|<b style="color:#77b">Laundry</b><b style="color:#fb0">Pizza</b><b style="color:#b00">03</b>]] ([[User talk:LaundryPizza03|<span style="color:#0d0">d</span>]][[Special:Contribs/LaundryPizza03|<span style="color:#0bf">c̄</span>]]) 10:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
-===RfC: Genetic ancestry of Colombians===
+== Animation of map ==
-<!-- [[User:DoNotArchiveUntil]] 11:01, 18 July 2024 (UTC) -->{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|1721300467}}
-{{rfc|hist|sci|soc|rfcid=CF0B8D1}}
-There are two questions.
-#Should information about genetic studies in Colombia be included in this article, or only in [[Race and ethnicity in Colombia]]?
-#Which studies should be used for this information (in both articles)?
-#* {{cite journal |last1=Rojas |first1=Winston |last2=Parra |first2=María Victoria |last3=Campo |first3=Omer |last4=Caro |first4=María Antonieta |last5=Lopera |first5=Juan Guillermo |last6=Arias |first6=William |last7=Duque |first7=Constanza |last8=Naranjo |first8=Andrés |last9=García |first9=Jharley |last10=Vergara |first10=Candelaria |last11=Lopera |first11=Jaime |last12=Hernandez |first12=Erick |last13=Valencia |first13=Ana |last14=Caicedo |first14=Yuri |last15=Cuartas |first15=Mauricio |last16=Gutiérrez |first16=Javier |last17=López |first17=Sergio |last18=Ruiz-Linares |first18=Andrés |last19=Bedoya |first19=Gabriel |title=Genetic make up and structure of Colombian populations by means of uniparental and biparental DNA markers |journal=American Journal of Physical Anthropology |date=September 2010 |volume=143 |issue=1 |pages=13–20 |doi=10.1002/ajpa.21270 |pmid=20734436 |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/45822469 |access-date=13 February 2024}}
-#* {{Cite journal |last1=Ruiz-Linares |first1=Andrés |last2=Adhikari |first2=Kaustubh |last3=Acuña-Alonzo |first3=Victor |last4=Quinto-Sanchez |first4=Mirsha |last5=Jaramillo |first5=Claudia |last6=Arias |first6=William |last7=Fuentes |first7=Macarena |last8=Pizarro |first8=María |last9=Everardo |first9=Paola |last10=de Avila |first10=Francisco |last11=Gómez-Valdés |first11=Jorge |last12=León-Mimila |first12=Paola |last13=Hunemeier |first13=Tábita |last14=Ramallo |first14=Virginia |last15=Silva de Cerqueira |first15=Caio C. |date=2014-09-25 |title=Admixture in Latin America: Geographic Structure, Phenotypic Diversity and Self-Perception of Ancestry Based on 7,342 Individuals |journal=PLOS Genetics |volume=10 |issue=9 |pages=e1004572 |doi=10.1371/journal.pgen.1004572 |doi-access=free |issn=1553-7390 |pmc=4177621 |pmid=25254375}}
-#* {{Cite journal |last1=Homburger |first1=Julian R. |last2=Moreno-Estrada |first2=Andrés |last3=Gignoux |first3=Christopher R. |last4=Nelson |first4=Dominic |last5=Sanchez |first5=Elena |last6=Ortiz-Tello |first6=Patricia |last7=Pons-Estel |first7=Bernardo A. |last8=Acevedo-Vasquez |first8=Eduardo |last9=Miranda |first9=Pedro |last10=Langefeld |first10=Carl D. |last11=Gravel |first11=Simon |last12=Alarcón-Riquelme |first12=Marta E. |last13=Bustamante |first13=Carlos D. |date=2015-12-04 |title=Genomic Insights into the Ancestry and Demographic History of South America |journal=PLOS Genetics |volume=11 |issue=12 |pages=e1005602 |doi=10.1371/journal.pgen.1005602 |doi-access=free |issn=1553-7390 |pmc=4670080 |pmid=26636962}}
-#* {{Cite journal |last1=Mooney |first1=Jazlyn A. |last2=Huber |first2=Christian D. |last3=Service |first3=Susan |last4=Sul |first4=Jae Hoon |last5=Marsden |first5=Clare D. |last6=Zhang |first6=Zhongyang |last7=Sabatti |first7=Chiara |last8=Ruiz-Linares |first8=Andrés |last9=Bedoya |first9=Gabriel |last10=Endophenotypes |first10=Costa Rica/Colombia Consortium for Genetic Investigation of Bipolar |last11=Freimer |first11=Nelson |last12=Lohmueller |first12=Kirk E. |date=2018-11-11 |title=Understanding the Hidden Complexity of Latin American Population Isolates |journal=American Journal of Human Genetics |language=en |volume=103 |issue=5 |pages=707–726 |doi=10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.09.013 |pmid=30401458|pmc=6218714 }}
-#* A study not included on this list (please provide full citation).
-–[[User:LaundryPizza03|<b style="color:#77b">Laundry</b><b style="color:#fb0">Pizza</b><b style="color:#b00">03</b>]] ([[User talk:LaundryPizza03|<span style="color:#0d0">d</span>]][[Special:Contribs/LaundryPizza03|<span style="color:#0bf">c̄</span>]]) 10:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
+The animation of the historical map would disturb some people. It doesn't meet the accessibility guidelines of the manual style which recommends animations should be under user control (or only run once). I am not technically proficient enough to modify it so I ask another editor to do so. [[User:Humphrey Tribble|Humpster]] ([[User talk:Humphrey Tribble|talk]]) 04:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
-:The 2010 source should be used 100%, I will list reasons why
-:* The 2014, 2015, and 2018 sources all have less sample size than the 2010 one
-:* 2014 and 2018 sources focus mostly on antioquia and not all of columbia, the 2018 one shows the genetics of population isolates from antioquia which it literally shows in the title and is not representative of the country, the 2014 one mostly conducts on people from antioquia and surrounding regions and not the entire country as shown by the purple dot concentration mostly being around antioquia which supported by the 2010 source is the most European state there
-:* The 2015 one uses isolated native groups that aren’t even similar to the native groups that colombians are closest to and being that colombians have little in common with these groups the ancestry for the native contribution shows as lower than usual
-:* The 2010 study shows the contribution of most of the populated states and urban columbians from those states and it has the most sample size with around 2000 it takes the genetic ancestry of the most common native groups in columbia which are more similar to the general population it has a specific breakdown of each state which has antioquia has the most white genetics and the amazon has the least
-:* The 2014 2015 and 2015 sources don’t specifically focus on columbia but Latin America as a whole and focus in on a specific region or city with smaller samples, they focus more on having a general overview of Latin America but aren’t specific sources for the genetics of colombians
-:* This one the 2010 one has been used previously and focuses on specifically columbia and the individual states while also doing research on the most common ancestry groups for colombians it is specifically trying to get the average genetics for colombians which the other three don’t and rather are trying to get a general overview of latin america
-:[[User:ElMexicanotres|ElMexicanotres]] ([[User talk:ElMexicanotres|talk]]) 14:19, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
-::And because of these things only the 2010 one should be used for the specific genetics of Colombia because it is specific to the country [[User:ElMexicanotres|ElMexicanotres]] ([[User talk:ElMexicanotres|talk]]) 14:23, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
-:::And that includes both [[Colombia]] and [[Race and ethnicity in Colombia]] [[User:ElMexicanotres|ElMexicanotres]] ([[User talk:ElMexicanotres|talk]]) 14:24, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
-:'''Rojas et al. should be included''' - All could be used for small details but Rojas et al. is best for generalizations about the entire country. [[User:XeCyranium|XeCyranium]] ([[User talk:XeCyranium|talk]]) 01:30, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
+:@[[User:Humphrey Tribble|Humphrey Tribble]], I think I spoke to you before on [[Three body problem]]—since then, I decided the lazy way was sufficient: the results are fine when I convert GIFs directly to videos and reupload them. Should I write a little essay explaining how to do this? <span style="border-radius:2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F">[[User:Remsense|<span style="color:#fff">'''Remsense'''</span>]]<span style="color:#fff">&nbsp;‥&nbsp;</span>[[User talk:Remsense|<span lang="zh" style="color:#fff">'''论'''</span>]]</span> 04:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
-, only, on both.[[User:Mwinog2777|Mwinog2777]] ([[User talk:Mwinog2777|talk]]) 16:26, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
+::I think a step-by-step guide would be useful {{user| Remsense}}. I might be able to do some conversions myself, but if not I can point other editors to the procedure. Thank you. [[User:Humphrey Tribble|Humpster]] ([[User talk:Humphrey Tribble|talk]]) 04:58, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
-:'''No''' an overview article about a country isn't the place for genetic studies.... As seen by every other country article.<span style="font-weight:bold;color:darkblue">[[User:Moxy|Moxy]]</span>🍁 01:41, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
+:::Will put it on my list and get it out ASAP. <span style="border-radius:2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F">[[User:Remsense|<span style="color:#fff">'''Remsense'''</span>]]<span style="color:#fff">&nbsp;‥&nbsp;</span>[[User talk:Remsense|<span lang="zh" style="color:#fff">'''论'''</span>]]</span> 04:59, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
-:'''Comment''' It could be helpful to include if there is general agreement among the studies on certain positions. [[User:Senorangel|Senorangel]] ([[User talk:Senorangel|talk]]) 04:54, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
-:'''Not here, but maybe race and ethnicity'''. I don't think genetic studies make much sense in this Colombia article. The Race and ethnicity article make more sense for genetics, but I would caution that genetically race and ethnicity do not exist. Racism would be validated on genetic grounds if such was actually the case.[[User:Ramos1990|&#32;Ramos1990]] ([[User talk:Ramos1990|talk]]) 07:58, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
-::While I probably won’t vote on this RfC (at least #2), I feel obligated to chime in that this is completely and utterly fallacious as it misses the point. The social construction of race is not the point, as these genetic studies deal with tracing ancestry to multiple discrete and highly disparate populations, which are indeed identifiable genetically. [[User:RadioactiveBoulevardier|RadioactiveBoulevardier]] ([[User talk:RadioactiveBoulevardier|talk]]) 12:18, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
-:'''No''', agree with those above that genetics is not really due at this level of article. Human societies are not structured by haplotype. The sources in question ''may'' be relevant at [[Race and ethnicity in Colombia]], but as RadioactiveBoulevardier mentions both race and ethnicity are more a question of sociology than of genetics. [[User:Chipmunkdavis|CMD]] ([[User talk:Chipmunkdavis|talk]]) 07:15, 25 June 2024 (UTC)