Jump to content

Radiodonta: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
OAbot (talk | contribs)
m Open access bot: doi updated in citation with #oabot.
m Tense clarification
 
(31 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Extinct order of basal arthropods}}
{{Short description|Extinct order of basal arthropods}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2024}}
{{Taxobox
{{Taxobox
| fossil_range = {{fossilrange|Cambrian Series 2|Early Devonian}}
| fossil_range = {{fossilrange|Cambrian Series 2|Early Devonian}}
Line 8: Line 9:
| classis = †[[Dinocaridida]]
| classis = †[[Dinocaridida]]
| ordo = †'''Radiodonta'''<br><small>[[Desmond H. Collins|Collins]], 1996</small>
| ordo = †'''Radiodonta'''<br><small>[[Desmond H. Collins|Collins]], 1996</small>
| synonyms = Anomalocarida
| subdivision_ranks = [[Family (biology)|Families]]
| subdivision_ranks = [[Family (biology)|Families]]
| subdivision = * {{extinct}}[[Anomalocarididae]]
| subdivision = * {{extinct}}[[Anomalocarididae]]
Line 21: Line 23:
** {{extinct}}''[[Paranomalocaris]]''
** {{extinct}}''[[Paranomalocaris]]''
** {{extinct}}''[[Shucaris]]''
** {{extinct}}''[[Shucaris]]''
**{{extinct}}''[[Zhenghecaris]]''?
}}
}}


'''Radiodonta''' is an extinct [[Order (biology)|order]] of [[stem-group]] [[arthropods]] that was successful worldwide during the [[Cambrian]] period. They may be referred to as '''radiodonts''',<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last1=Cong|first1=Pei-Yun|last2=Edgecombe|first2=Gregory D.|last3=Daley|first3=Allison C.|last4=Guo|first4=Jin|last5=Pates|first5=Stephen|last6=Hou|first6=Xian-Guang|date=2018|title=New radiodonts with gnathobase-like structures from the Cambrian Chengjiang biota and implications for the systematics of Radiodonta|journal=Papers in Palaeontology|language=en|volume=4|issue=4|pages=605–621|doi=10.1002/spp2.1219|s2cid=90258934|issn=2056-2802|url=https://serval.unil.ch/notice/serval:BIB_A3714F0A56F0|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":6" /><ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last1=Moysiuk|first1=J.|last2=Caron|first2=J.-B.|date=2019-08-14|title=A new hurdiid radiodont from the Burgess Shale evinces the exploitation of Cambrian infaunal food sources|journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences|volume=286|issue=1908|pages=20191079|doi=10.1098/rspb.2019.1079|pmc=6710600|pmid=31362637}}</ref> '''radiodontans''',<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal|last1=Cong|first1=Peiyun|last2=Daley|first2=Allison C.|last3=Edgecombe|first3=Gregory D.|last4=Hou|first4=Xianguang|date=2017-08-30|title=The functional head of the Cambrian radiodontan (stem-group Euarthropoda) ''Amplectobelua symbrachiata''|journal=BMC Evolutionary Biology|volume=17|issue=1|pages=208|doi=10.1186/s12862-017-1049-1|issn=1471-2148|pmc=5577670|pmid=28854872 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name=":7">{{Cite journal |last1=Cong |first1=Peiyun |last2=Daley |first2=Allison C. |last3=Edgecombe |first3=Gregory D. |last4=Hou |first4=Xianguang |last5=Chen |first5=Ailin |date=September 2016 |title=Morphology of the radiodontan ''Lyrarapax'' from the early Cambrian Chengjiang biota |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305769020 |journal=Journal of Paleontology |language=en |volume=90 |issue=4 |pages=663–671 |doi=10.1017/jpa.2016.67 |issn=0022-3360 |s2cid=88742430}}</ref> '''radiodontids''',<ref name="collins1996" /> '''anomalocarids''',<ref name="vinther2014" /> or '''anomalocaridids''',<ref name="daley2009" /><ref name="cong2014" /><ref name="vanroy2015">{{cite journal|last1=Van Roy|first1=Peter|last2=Daley|first2=Allison C.|last3=Briggs|first3=Derek E. G.|year=2015|title=Anomalocaridid trunk limb homology revealed by a giant filter-feeder with paired flaps|journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]]|volume=522|issue=7554|pages=77–80|doi=10.1038/nature14256|pmid=25762145|bibcode=2015Natur.522...77V|s2cid=205242881}}</ref> although the last two originally refer to the family [[Anomalocarididae]], which previously included all species of this order but is now restricted to only a few species.<ref name="vinther2014" /> Radiodonts are distinguished by their distinctive frontal appendages, which are morphologically diverse and used for a variety of functions. Radiodonts included the earliest large predators known, but they also included sediment sifters and filter feeders.<ref name=":5">{{Cite journal|last1=De Vivo|first1=Giacinto|last2=Lautenschlager|first2=Stephan|last3=Vinther|first3=Jakob|date=2021-07-28|title=Three-dimensional modelling, disparity and ecology of the first Cambrian apex predators|journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences|volume=288|issue=1955|pages=20211176|doi=10.1098/rspb.2021.1176|pmc=8292756|pmid=34284622}}</ref> Some of the most famous species of radiodonts are the [[Cambrian]] taxa ''[[Anomalocaris|Anomalocaris canadensis]]'', ''[[Hurdia|Hurdia victoria]]'', ''[[Peytoia nathorsti]]'', ''[[Titanokorys gainesii|Titanokorys gainessii]], [[Cambroraster|Cambroraster falcatus]]'' and ''[[Amplectobelua|Amplectobelua symbrachiata]]''. The later surviving members include the subfamily [[Aegirocassisinae]] from the [[Early Ordovician]] of [[Morocco]] and the [[Early Devonian]] member ''[[Schinderhannes bartelsi]]'' from [[Germany]].
'''Radiodonta''' (also known as '''radiodonts''',<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last1=Cong |first1=Pei-Yun |last2=Edgecombe |first2=Gregory D. |last3=Daley |first3=Allison C. |last4=Guo |first4=Jin |last5=Pates |first5=Stephen |last6=Hou |first6=Xian-Guang |date=2018 |title=New radiodonts with gnathobase-like structures from the Cambrian Chengjiang biota and implications for the systematics of Radiodonta |url=https://serval.unil.ch/notice/serval:BIB_A3714F0A56F0 |journal=Papers in Palaeontology |language=en |volume=4 |issue=4 |pages=605–621 |doi=10.1002/spp2.1219 |issn=2056-2802 |s2cid=90258934 |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":6" /><ref name=":1">{{Cite journal |last1=Moysiuk |first1=J. |last2=Caron |first2=J.-B. |date=14 August 2019 |title=A new hurdiid radiodont from the Burgess Shale evinces the exploitation of Cambrian infaunal food sources |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences |volume=286 |issue=1908 |pages=20191079 |doi=10.1098/rspb.2019.1079 |pmc=6710600 |pmid=31362637}}</ref> '''radiodontans''',<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal |last1=Cong |first1=Peiyun |last2=Daley |first2=Allison C. |last3=Edgecombe |first3=Gregory D. |last4=Hou |first4=Xianguang |date=30 August 2017 |title=The functional head of the Cambrian radiodontan (stem-group Euarthropoda) ''Amplectobelua symbrachiata'' |journal=BMC Evolutionary Biology |volume=17 |issue=1 |pages=208 |doi=10.1186/s12862-017-1049-1 |issn=1471-2148 |pmc=5577670 |pmid=28854872 |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":7">{{Cite journal |last1=Cong |first1=Peiyun |last2=Daley |first2=Allison C. |last3=Edgecombe |first3=Gregory D. |last4=Hou |first4=Xianguang |last5=Chen |first5=Ailin |date=September 2016 |title=Morphology of the radiodontan ''Lyrarapax'' from the early Cambrian Chengjiang biota |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305769020 |journal=Journal of Paleontology |language=en |volume=90 |issue=4 |pages=663–671 |doi=10.1017/jpa.2016.67 |issn=0022-3360 |s2cid=88742430}}</ref> '''radiodontids''',<ref name="collins1996" /> '''anomalocarids''',<ref name="vinther2014" /> or '''anomalocaridids''',<ref name="daley2009" /><ref name="cong2014" /><ref name="vanroy2015">{{cite journal |last1=Van Roy |first1=Peter |last2=Daley |first2=Allison C. |last3=Briggs |first3=Derek E. G. |year=2015 |title=Anomalocaridid trunk limb homology revealed by a giant filter-feeder with paired flaps |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |volume=522 |issue=7554 |pages=77–80 |bibcode=2015Natur.522...77V |doi=10.1038/nature14256 |pmid=25762145 |s2cid=205242881}}</ref> although the last two originally refer to the family [[Anomalocarididae]], which previously included all species of this order but is now restricted to only a few species.<ref name="vinther2014" />) is an extinct [[Order (biology)|order]] of [[stem-group]] [[arthropods]] that was successful worldwide during the [[Cambrian]] period. Radiodonts are distinguished by their distinctive frontal appendages, which are morphologically diverse and were used for a variety of functions. Radiodonts were among the earliest large predators, but they also included sediment sifters and filter feeders.<ref name=":5">{{Cite journal|last1=De Vivo|first1=Giacinto|last2=Lautenschlager|first2=Stephan|last3=Vinther|first3=Jakob|date=28 July 2021|title=Three-dimensional modelling, disparity and ecology of the first Cambrian apex predators|journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences|volume=288|issue=1955|pages=20211176|doi=10.1098/rspb.2021.1176|pmc=8292756|pmid=34284622}}</ref> Some of the most famous species of radiodonts are the [[Cambrian]] taxa ''[[Anomalocaris|Anomalocaris canadensis]]'', ''[[Hurdia|Hurdia victoria]]'', ''[[Peytoia nathorsti]]'', ''[[Titanokorys gainesii|Titanokorys gainesi]], [[Cambroraster|Cambroraster falcatus]]'' and ''[[Amplectobelua|Amplectobelua symbrachiata]]''. The later surviving members include the subfamily [[Aegirocassisinae]] from the [[Early Ordovician]] of [[Morocco]] and the [[Early Devonian]] member ''[[Schinderhannes bartelsi]]'' from Germany.


==Etymology==
==Etymology==
Line 38: Line 41:
[[File:20210208 Radiodonta size comparison complete specimens.png|thumb|left|300px|Size estimation and comparison of radiodont species known by nearly complete specimens]]
[[File:20210208 Radiodonta size comparison complete specimens.png|thumb|left|300px|Size estimation and comparison of radiodont species known by nearly complete specimens]]


Most radiodonts were significantly larger than the other [[Cambrian]] fauna, with typical body lengths of large taxa varying from {{cvt|30|to|50|cm|in}}.<ref>{{cite book|author=Foster, J.|year=2014|chapter=Magical Mystery Tour: The Biological Psychedelia of the Burgess Shale|title=Cambrian Ocean World: Ancient Sea Life of North America|publisher=Indiana University Press|pages=195—252|isbn=978-0253011824}}</ref> The largest described radiodont is the [[Early Ordovician]] species [[Aegirocassis benmoulae|''Aegirocassis benmoulai'']], which may have grown up to {{cvt|2|m|ft}} long.<ref name="vanroy2015" /><ref name=":6" /> A nearly complete specimen of a juvenile ''Lyrarapax unguispinus'' measured only {{cvt|18|mm|in}}, making it among the smallest radiodont specimens known, though adults reached a length of {{cvt|8.3|cm|in}}<ref name=":6"/><ref name=":13">{{Cite journal|last1=Liu|first1=Jianni|last2=Lerosey-Aubril|first2=Rudy|last3=Steiner|first3=Michael|last4=Dunlop|first4=Jason A.|last5=Shu|first5=Degan|last6=Paterson|first6=John R.|date=2018-11-01|title=Origin of raptorial feeding in juvenile euarthropods revealed by a Cambrian radiodontan|journal=National Science Review|language=en|volume=5|issue=6|pages=863–869|doi=10.1093/nsr/nwy057|issn=2095-5138|doi-access=free}}</ref> An isolated frontal appendage of a hurdiid with a length less than half that of the juvenile ''Lyrarapax'' is known, but it is not known whether this specimen pertains to an adult.<ref name="Patesetal2020"/> The largest known Cambrian radiodont was ''Amplectobelua'', reaching lengths of up to {{cvt|90|cm|in}} based on an incomplete specimen.<ref name=":84">{{Cite journal |last1=Wu |first1=Yu |last2=Pates |first2=Stephen |last3=Pauly |first3=Daniel |last4=Zhang |first4=Xingliang |last5=Fu |first5=Dongjing |date=2023-11-03 |title=Rapid growth in a large Cambrian apex predator |journal=National Science Review |doi=10.1093/nsr/nwad284 |issn=2095-5138|doi-access=free |pmc=10833464 }}</ref> ''Anomalocaris canadensis'' was also relatively large, estimated up to {{cvt|34.2|-|37.8|cm|in}} long,<ref name=":6" /> and the Cambrian hurdiid ''Titanokorys'' approached around {{cvt|50|cm|in}} long.<ref name="CaronMoysiuk2021"/>
Most radiodonts were significantly larger than the other [[Cambrian]] fauna, with typical body lengths of large taxa varying from {{cvt|30|to|50|cm|in}}.<ref>{{cite book|author=Foster, J.|year=2014|chapter=Magical Mystery Tour: The Biological Psychedelia of the Burgess Shale|title=Cambrian Ocean World: Ancient Sea Life of North America|publisher=Indiana University Press|pages=195—252|isbn=978-0253011824}}</ref> The largest described radiodont is the [[Early Ordovician]] species [[Aegirocassis benmoulae|''Aegirocassis benmoulai'']], which may have grown up to {{cvt|2|m|ft}} long.<ref name="vanroy2015" /><ref name=":6" /> A nearly complete specimen of a juvenile ''Lyrarapax unguispinus'' measured only {{cvt|18|mm|in}}, making it among the smallest radiodont specimens known, though adults reached a length of {{cvt|8.3|cm|in}}<ref name=":6"/><ref name=":13">{{Cite journal|last1=Liu|first1=Jianni|last2=Lerosey-Aubril|first2=Rudy|last3=Steiner|first3=Michael|last4=Dunlop|first4=Jason A.|last5=Shu|first5=Degan|last6=Paterson|first6=John R.|date=1 November 2018|title=Origin of raptorial feeding in juvenile euarthropods revealed by a Cambrian radiodontan|journal=National Science Review|language=en|volume=5|issue=6|pages=863–869|doi=10.1093/nsr/nwy057|issn=2095-5138|doi-access=free}}</ref> An isolated frontal appendage of a hurdiid with a length less than half that of the juvenile ''Lyrarapax'' is known, but it is not known whether this specimen pertains to an adult.<ref name="Patesetal2020"/> The largest known Cambrian radiodont was ''Amplectobelua'', reaching lengths of up to {{cvt|90|cm|in}} based on an incomplete specimen.<ref name=":84">{{Cite journal |last1=Wu |first1=Yu |last2=Pates |first2=Stephen |last3=Pauly |first3=Daniel |last4=Zhang |first4=Xingliang |last5=Fu |first5=Dongjing |date=3 November 2023 |title=Rapid growth in a large Cambrian apex predator |journal=National Science Review |doi=10.1093/nsr/nwad284 |issn=2095-5138|doi-access=free |pmc=10833464 }}</ref> ''Anomalocaris canadensis'' was also relatively large, estimated up to {{cvt|34.2|-|37.8|cm|in}} long,<ref name=":6" /> and the Cambrian hurdiid ''Titanokorys'' approached around {{cvt|50|cm|in}} long.<ref name="CaronMoysiuk2021"/>


The body of a radiodont could be divided into two regions: head and trunk. The head is composed of only one body segment<ref name=":8" /> known as the ocular somite, covered by sclerites (head carapace complex), bore arthropodized frontal appendages, ventral mouthparts (oral cone), and [[Eyestalk|stalked]] [[compound eye]]s. The tapering trunk is composed of multiple body segments, each associated with pairs of flaps and gill-like structures (setal blades).<ref name=":1" />
The body of a radiodont could be divided into two regions: head and trunk. The head is composed of only one body segment<ref name=":8" /> known as the ocular somite, covered by sclerites (head carapace complex), bore arthropodized frontal appendages, ventral mouthparts (oral cone), and [[Eyestalk|stalked]] [[compound eye]]s. The tapering trunk is composed of multiple body segments, each associated with pairs of flaps and gill-like structures (setal blades).<ref name=":1" />
Line 51: Line 54:
}}
}}


The anterior structures on the head are a pair of frontal appendages which have been referred to as 'claws', 'grasping appendages', 'feeding appendages', or 'great appendages' in previous studies (the last term is discouraged since the homology between frontal appendages and the original, morphologically distinct [[megacheira]]n [[great appendage]]s is questionable.<ref name=":8" /><ref name=":18">{{Cite journal|last1=Zeng|first1=Han|last2=Zhao|first2=Fangchen|last3=Niu|first3=Kecheng|last4=Zhu|first4=Maoyan|last5=Huang|first5=Diying|date=2020|title=An early Cambrian euarthropod with radiodont-like raptorial appendages|url=https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2883-7|journal=Nature|language=en|volume=588|issue=7836|pages=101–105|doi=10.1038/s41586-020-2883-7|pmid=33149303|bibcode=2020Natur.588..101Z|s2cid=226248177|issn=1476-4687}}</ref>). They are [[Sclerotin|sclerotized]] (hardened) and arthropodized (segmented), bearing ventral endites (spines) on most of their podomeres (segmental units), and the endites may bear additional rows of auxiliary spines on their anterior and posterior margins.<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal|last1=Pates|first1=Stephen|last2=Daley|first2=Allison C.|last3=Butterfield|first3=Nicholas J.|date=2019-06-11|title=First report of paired ventral endites in a hurdiid radiodont |journal=Zoological Letters|volume=5|issue=1|pages=18|doi=10.1186/s40851-019-0132-4|issn=2056-306X|pmc=6560863|pmid=31210962 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name=":1" /> The frontal appendage consists of two regions: the shaft ('peduncle',<ref name=":6" /> 'base'<ref name=":19">{{Cite journal|last1=Wu|first1=Yu|last2=Ma|first2=Jiaxin|last3=Lin|first3=Weiliang|last4=Sun|first4=Ao|last5=Zhang|first5=Xingliang|last6=Fu|first6=Dongjing|date=2021-05-01|title=New anomalocaridids (Panarthropoda: Radiodonta) from the lower Cambrian Chengjiang Lagerstätte: Biostratigraphic and paleobiogeographic implications|url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031018221001188|journal=Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology|language=en|volume=569|pages=110333|doi=10.1016/j.palaeo.2021.110333|bibcode=2021PPP...569k0333W|s2cid=233565727|issn=0031-0182}}</ref> or 'promixal region'<ref name=":6" /> in some studies) and the distal articulated region<ref name=":3" /> (also referred to as 'claw'<ref name=":19" />). A triangular region covered by soft cuticle (arthrodial membrane) may occur on the ventral side between podomeres and provide flexibility.<ref name=":16" /><ref name=":5" /> Their purported pre-ocular and protocerebral origin suggest they are homologous to the primary antennae of [[Onychophora]] and the [[Labrum (arthropod mouthpart)|labrum]] of [[Euarthropoda]] (all arose from ocular [[somite]]),<ref name=":8">{{Cite journal|last1=Ortega-Hernández|first1=Javier|last2=Janssen|first2=Ralf|last3=Budd|first3=Graham E.|date=2017-05-01|title=Origin and evolution of the panarthropod head – A palaeobiological and developmental perspective|journal=Arthropod Structure & Development|series=Evolution of Segmentation|volume=46|issue=3|pages=354–379|doi=10.1016/j.asd.2016.10.011|issn=1467-8039|pmid=27989966|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name="cong2014">{{cite journal |first1=Peiyun |last1=Cong |first2=Xiaoya |last2=Ma |first3=Xianguang |last3=Hou |first4=Gregory D. |last4=Edgecombe |first5=Nicholas J. |last5=Strausfeld |year=2014 |title=Brain structure resolves the segmental affinity of anomalocaridid appendages |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |doi=10.1038/nature13486 |pmid=25043032 |volume=513 |issue=7519 |pages=538–42|bibcode=2014Natur.513..538C |s2cid=4451239 }}</ref> while subsequent studies also suggest a deutocerebral origin and homologous with the [[chelicerae]] of [[Chelicerata]] and the [[Antenna (biology)|antennae]] or '[[great appendage]]s' of other arthropods (all arose from post-ocular somite 1).<ref name=":41" /> Since the morphology of the frontal appendages, especially those of the spines, always differs between species, it is one of the most important means of species identification.<ref name=":3" /> In fact, many radiodonts are only known from a handful of fossilized frontal appendages.<ref name=":16" /><ref name=":3" />
The anterior structures on the head are a pair of frontal appendages which have been referred to as 'claws', 'grasping appendages', 'feeding appendages', or 'great appendages' in previous studies (the last term is discouraged since the homology between frontal appendages and the original, morphologically distinct [[megacheira]]n [[great appendage]]s is questionable.<ref name=":8" /><ref name=":18">{{Cite journal|last1=Zeng|first1=Han|last2=Zhao|first2=Fangchen|last3=Niu|first3=Kecheng|last4=Zhu|first4=Maoyan|last5=Huang|first5=Diying|date=2020|title=An early Cambrian euarthropod with radiodont-like raptorial appendages|url=https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2883-7|journal=Nature|language=en|volume=588|issue=7836|pages=101–105|doi=10.1038/s41586-020-2883-7|pmid=33149303|bibcode=2020Natur.588..101Z|s2cid=226248177|issn=1476-4687}}</ref>). They are [[Sclerotin|sclerotized]] (hardened) and arthropodized (segmented), bearing ventral endites (spines) on most of their podomeres (segmental units), and the endites may bear additional rows of auxiliary spines on their anterior and posterior margins.<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal|last1=Pates|first1=Stephen|last2=Daley|first2=Allison C.|last3=Butterfield|first3=Nicholas J.|date=11 June 2019|title=First report of paired ventral endites in a hurdiid radiodont |journal=Zoological Letters|volume=5|issue=1|pages=18|doi=10.1186/s40851-019-0132-4|issn=2056-306X|pmc=6560863|pmid=31210962 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name=":1" /> The frontal appendage consists of two regions: the shaft ('peduncle',<ref name=":6" /> 'base'<ref name=":19">{{Cite journal|last1=Wu|first1=Yu|last2=Ma|first2=Jiaxin|last3=Lin|first3=Weiliang|last4=Sun|first4=Ao|last5=Zhang|first5=Xingliang|last6=Fu|first6=Dongjing|date=1 May 2021|title=New anomalocaridids (Panarthropoda: Radiodonta) from the lower Cambrian Chengjiang Lagerstätte: Biostratigraphic and paleobiogeographic implications|url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031018221001188|journal=Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology|language=en|volume=569|pages=110333|doi=10.1016/j.palaeo.2021.110333|bibcode=2021PPP...569k0333W|s2cid=233565727|issn=0031-0182}}</ref> or 'promixal region'<ref name=":6" /> in some studies) and the distal articulated region<ref name=":3" /> (also referred to as 'claw'<ref name=":19" />). A triangular region covered by soft cuticle (arthrodial membrane) may occur on the ventral side between podomeres and provide flexibility.<ref name=":16" /><ref name=":5" /> Their purported pre-ocular and protocerebral origin suggest they are homologous to the primary antennae of [[Onychophora]] and the [[Labrum (arthropod mouthpart)|labrum]] of [[Euarthropoda]] (all arose from ocular [[somite]]),<ref name=":8">{{Cite journal|last1=Ortega-Hernández|first1=Javier|last2=Janssen|first2=Ralf|last3=Budd|first3=Graham E.|date=1 May 2017|title=Origin and evolution of the panarthropod head – A palaeobiological and developmental perspective|journal=Arthropod Structure & Development|series=Evolution of Segmentation|volume=46|issue=3|pages=354–379|doi=10.1016/j.asd.2016.10.011|issn=1467-8039|pmid=27989966|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name="cong2014">{{cite journal |first1=Peiyun |last1=Cong |first2=Xiaoya |last2=Ma |first3=Xianguang |last3=Hou |first4=Gregory D. |last4=Edgecombe |first5=Nicholas J. |last5=Strausfeld |year=2014 |title=Brain structure resolves the segmental affinity of anomalocaridid appendages |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |doi=10.1038/nature13486 |pmid=25043032 |volume=513 |issue=7519 |pages=538–42|bibcode=2014Natur.513..538C |s2cid=4451239 }}</ref> while subsequent studies also suggest a deutocerebral origin and homologous with the [[chelicerae]] of [[Chelicerata]] and the [[Antenna (biology)|antennae]] or '[[great appendage]]s' of other arthropods (all arose from post-ocular somite 1).<ref name=":41" /> Since the morphology of the frontal appendages, especially those of the spines, always differs between species, it is one of the most important means of species identification.<ref name=":3" /> In fact, many radiodonts are only known from a handful of fossilized frontal appendages.<ref name=":16" /><ref name=":3" />


<gallery mode="packed" heights="200">
<gallery mode="packed" heights="200">
Line 90: Line 93:
</gallery>
</gallery>


The trunk appendages were fin-like body flaps ('lateral flaps' or 'lobes' in some studies), usually one pair of ventral flaps per body segment, each slightly overlapping the one more anterior to it, but additional, non-overlapping sets of small dorsal flaps may occur in some [[Hurdiidae|Hurdiid]] species.<ref name="vanroy2015" /> The flaps may have numerous vein-like structures (referred to as 'strengthening rays',<ref name=":7" /> 'flap rays',<ref name=":1" /> 'tranverse rods',<ref name="vanroy2015" /> 'transverse lines'<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Daley|first1=Allison C.|last2=Paterson|first2=John R.|last3=Edgecombe|first3=Gregory D.|last4=García-Bellido|first4=Diego C.|last5=Jago|first5=James B.|date=2013|title=New anatomical information on Anomalocaris from the Cambrian Emu Bay Shale of South Australia and a reassessment of its inferred predatory habits|journal=Palaeontology|language=en|volume=56|issue=5|pages=971–990|doi=10.1111/pala.12029|s2cid=128955512 |issn=1475-4983|doi-access=free}}</ref> or 'veins'<ref name=":20">{{Cite journal|last1=Chen|first1=Jun-yuan|last2=Ramsköld|first2=Lars|last3=Zhou|first3=Gui-qing|date=1994-05-27|title=Evidence for Monophyly and Arthropod Affinity of Cambrian Giant Predators|url=https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.264.5163.1304 |journal=Science|volume=264|issue=5163|pages=1304–1308|language=EN|doi=10.1126/science.264.5163.1304|pmid=17780848|bibcode=1994Sci...264.1304C|s2cid=1913482}}</ref>). The flaps on the neck region (referred to as 'reduced flaps',<ref name=":2" /> 'neck flaps',<ref name=":7" /> 'head flaps',<ref name="daley2014" /> 'anterior flaps'<ref name=":26">{{Cite journal|last1=Aria|first1=Cédric|last2=Zhao|first2=Fangchen|last3=Zeng|first3=Han|last4=Guo|first4=Jin|last5=Zhu|first5=Maoyan|date=2020-01-08|title=Fossils from South China redefine the ancestral euarthropod body plan|journal=BMC Evolutionary Biology|volume=20|issue=1|pages=4|doi=10.1186/s12862-019-1560-7|issn=1471-2148|pmc=6950928|pmid=31914921 |doi-access=free }}</ref> or 'differentiated flaps'<ref name=":18" />) are significantly reduced. In some species, jaw-like feeding appendages called gnathobase-like structures (GLSs) arose from each of the bases of their reduced neck flaps.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":0" /> Numerous elongated blade-like extensions (referred to as lanceolate blades or lamellae<ref name=":1" />) arranged in a row, forming bands of [[gill]]-like structures known as setal blades, covered the dorsal surface of each body segment.<ref name="vanroy2015" /> At least in ''[[Aegirocassis]]'', each of the lanceolate blades are covered in wrinkles.<ref name="vanroy2015" /> The ventral flaps may be homologous to the endopod of the biramous limbs of euarthropods and lobopodous limbs (lobopods) of gilled [[lobopodia]]ns, and the dorsal flaps and setal blades may be homologous to the exite and gill-bearing dorsal flaps of the former taxa.<ref name="vanroy2013">{{cite conference |first1=Peter |last1=Van Roy |first2=Allison C. |last2=Daley |first3=Derek E. G. |last3=Briggs |year=2013 |title=Anomalocaridids had two sets of lateral flaps |conference=57th Annual Meeting of The Paleontological Association |location=Zurich, Switzerland }}</ref><ref name="vanroy2015" /> The trunk may end either with a tail fan compose of 1 to 3 pairs of blades,<ref name=":20" /><ref name="daley2014" /><ref name=":1" /> a pair of long furcae,<ref name=":20" /><ref name=":13"/><ref name=":1" /> an elongated terminal structure,<ref name="daley2014" /> or a featureless blunt tip.<ref name="vanroy2015" />
The trunk appendages were fin-like body flaps ('lateral flaps' or 'lobes' in some studies), usually one pair of ventral flaps per body segment, each slightly overlapping the one more anterior to it, but additional, non-overlapping sets of small dorsal flaps may occur in some [[Hurdiidae|Hurdiid]] species.<ref name="vanroy2015" /> The flaps may have numerous vein-like structures (referred to as 'strengthening rays',<ref name=":7" /> 'flap rays',<ref name=":1" /> 'tranverse rods',<ref name="vanroy2015" /> 'transverse lines'<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Daley|first1=Allison C.|last2=Paterson|first2=John R.|last3=Edgecombe|first3=Gregory D.|last4=García-Bellido|first4=Diego C.|last5=Jago|first5=James B.|date=2013|title=New anatomical information on Anomalocaris from the Cambrian Emu Bay Shale of South Australia and a reassessment of its inferred predatory habits|journal=Palaeontology|language=en|volume=56|issue=5|pages=971–990|doi=10.1111/pala.12029|s2cid=128955512 |issn=1475-4983|doi-access=free}}</ref> or 'veins'<ref name=":20">{{Cite journal|last1=Chen|first1=Jun-yuan|last2=Ramsköld|first2=Lars|last3=Zhou|first3=Gui-qing|date=27 May 1994|title=Evidence for Monophyly and Arthropod Affinity of Cambrian Giant Predators|url=https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.264.5163.1304 |journal=Science|volume=264|issue=5163|pages=1304–1308|language=EN|doi=10.1126/science.264.5163.1304|pmid=17780848|bibcode=1994Sci...264.1304C|s2cid=1913482}}</ref>). The flaps on the neck region (referred to as 'reduced flaps',<ref name=":2" /> 'neck flaps',<ref name=":7" /> 'head flaps',<ref name="daley2014" /> 'anterior flaps'<ref name=":26">{{Cite journal|last1=Aria|first1=Cédric|last2=Zhao|first2=Fangchen|last3=Zeng|first3=Han|last4=Guo|first4=Jin|last5=Zhu|first5=Maoyan|date=8 January 2020|title=Fossils from South China redefine the ancestral euarthropod body plan|journal=BMC Evolutionary Biology|volume=20|issue=1|pages=4|doi=10.1186/s12862-019-1560-7|issn=1471-2148|pmc=6950928|pmid=31914921 |doi-access=free }}</ref> or 'differentiated flaps'<ref name=":18" />) are significantly reduced. In some species, jaw-like feeding appendages called gnathobase-like structures (GLSs) arose from each of the bases of their reduced neck flaps.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":0" /> Numerous elongated blade-like extensions (referred to as lanceolate blades or lamellae<ref name=":1" />) arranged in a row, forming bands of [[gill]]-like structures known as setal blades, covered the dorsal surface of each body segment.<ref name="vanroy2015" /> At least in ''[[Aegirocassis]]'', each of the lanceolate blades are covered in wrinkles.<ref name="vanroy2015" /> The ventral flaps may be homologous to the endopod of the biramous limbs of euarthropods and lobopodous limbs (lobopods) of gilled [[lobopodia]]ns, and the dorsal flaps and setal blades may be homologous to the exite and gill-bearing dorsal flaps of the former taxa.<ref name="vanroy2013">{{cite conference |first1=Peter |last1=Van Roy |first2=Allison C. |last2=Daley |first3=Derek E. G. |last3=Briggs |year=2013 |title=Anomalocaridids had two sets of lateral flaps |conference=57th Annual Meeting of The Paleontological Association |location=Zurich, Switzerland }}</ref><ref name="vanroy2015" /> The trunk may end either with a tail fan compose of 1 to 3 pairs of blades,<ref name=":20" /><ref name="daley2014" /><ref name=":1" /> a pair of long furcae,<ref name=":20" /><ref name=":13"/><ref name=":1" /> an elongated terminal structure,<ref name="daley2014" /> or a featureless blunt tip.<ref name="vanroy2015" />


<gallery mode="packed" heights="120">
<gallery mode="packed" heights="120">
Line 102: Line 105:
[[File:20220719 Radiodonta digestive system.png|left|thumb|digestive system of a radiodont]]
[[File:20220719 Radiodonta digestive system.png|left|thumb|digestive system of a radiodont]]
[[File:20220715 Radiodonta brain interpretations.png|thumb|Various interpretations of radiodont brain. A: after Cong et al. 2014,<ref name="cong2014" /> B: after Moysiuk & Caron 2022<ref name=":41" />]]
[[File:20220715 Radiodonta brain interpretations.png|thumb|Various interpretations of radiodont brain. A: after Cong et al. 2014,<ref name="cong2014" /> B: after Moysiuk & Caron 2022<ref name=":41" />]]
Traces of [[muscles]], [[digestive system]] and [[nervous system]] were described from some radiodont fossils. Pairs of well-developed muscles were connected to the ventral flaps located at the lateral cavities of each body segment.<ref name="daley2014" /><ref name="cong2014" /> Between the lateral muscles is a sophisticated digestive system, formed by a widening of the foregut and hindgut, both connected by a narrow midgut associated with six pairs of gut divercula (digestive glands).<ref name="daley2014" /><ref name=":7" /><ref name=":10">{{Cite journal|last1=Vannier|first1=Jean|last2=Liu|first2=Jianni|last3=Lerosey-Aubril|first3=Rudy|last4=Vinther|first4=Jakob|last5=Daley|first5=Allison C.|date=2014-05-02|title=Sophisticated digestive systems in early arthropods|journal=Nature Communications|language=en|volume=5|issue=1|pages=3641|doi=10.1038/ncomms4641|issn=2041-1723|pmid=24785191|bibcode=2014NatCo...5.3641V|doi-access=free}}</ref>
Traces of [[muscles]], [[digestive system]] and [[nervous system]] were described from some radiodont fossils. Pairs of well-developed muscles were connected to the ventral flaps located at the lateral cavities of each body segment.<ref name="daley2014" /><ref name="cong2014" /> Between the lateral muscles is a sophisticated digestive system, formed by a widening of the foregut and hindgut, both connected by a narrow midgut associated with six pairs of gut divercula (digestive glands).<ref name="daley2014" /><ref name=":7" /><ref name=":10">{{Cite journal|last1=Vannier|first1=Jean|last2=Liu|first2=Jianni|last3=Lerosey-Aubril|first3=Rudy|last4=Vinther|first4=Jakob|last5=Daley|first5=Allison C.|date=2 May 2014|title=Sophisticated digestive systems in early arthropods|journal=Nature Communications|language=en|volume=5|issue=1|pages=3641|doi=10.1038/ncomms4641|issn=2041-1723|pmid=24785191|bibcode=2014NatCo...5.3641V|doi-access=free}}</ref>


The [[brain]] of radiodonts was simpler than the three-segmented (compose of pro-, deuto- and tritocerebrum) brains of [[euarthropod]]s, but further interpretations differ between studies. Based on Cong et al. 2014, the brain composed of only one brain segment originating from the ocular somite, the protocerebrum. The nerves of the frontal appendages and compound eyes arose from the anterior and lateral regions of the brain.<ref name="cong2014" /><ref name=":8" /> Based on Moysiuk & Caron 2022, the frontal appendage nerves arose from the ventral deutocerebrum, the second brain segment. The previous "frontal appendage nerves" actually represent median eye nerve.<ref name=":41" /> In both interpretations, posterior to the brain was a pair of apparently unfused [[ventral nerve cord]]s which ran through the animal's neck region.<ref name="cong2014" /><ref name=":41" />
The brain of radiodonts was simpler than the three-segmented (compose of pro-, deuto- and tritocerebrum) brains of [[euarthropod]]s, but further interpretations differ between studies. Based on Cong et al. 2014, the brain composed of only one brain segment originating from the ocular somite, the protocerebrum. The nerves of the frontal appendages and compound eyes arose from the anterior and lateral regions of the brain.<ref name="cong2014" /><ref name=":8" /> Based on Moysiuk & Caron 2022, the frontal appendage nerves arose from the ventral deutocerebrum, the second brain segment. The previous "frontal appendage nerves" actually represent median eye nerve.<ref name=":41" /> In both interpretations, posterior to the brain was a pair of apparently unfused [[ventral nerve cord]]s which ran through the animal's neck region.<ref name="cong2014" /><ref name=":41" />


== Paleoecology ==
== Paleoecology ==
=== Physiology ===
=== Physiology ===
{{multiple image
[[File:Cambroraster.jpg|thumb|Paleoecological reconstruction of a group of ''[[Cambroraster]]'' swimming over a brine seep]]
| align = right
| direction = horizontal
| width = 250
| header =
| image1 = Shucaris and Erratus.jpg
| alt1 =
| caption1 = Reconstruction of ''[[Shucaris]]'', an anomalocaridid or amplectobeluiid radiodont, using its frontal appendages to capture a fleeing ''[[Erratus]]''
| image2 = Fezouata_Biota.jpg
| alt2 =
| caption2 = Reconstruction of the Fezouata Biota, featuring ''[[Aegirocassis]]'', a [[filter feeder|filter feeding]] radiodont, and two species of ''[[Pseudoangustidontus]]''
}}


Radiodonts were interpreted as [[nektonic]] or [[nektobenthic]] animals, with their morphology suggesting an active swimming lifestyle. The muscular, overlapping ventral flaps may have propelled the animal through the water, possibly by moving in a wave-like formation resembling modern [[Batoidea|rays]] and [[cuttlefish]].<ref name=":31">{{Cite journal|last1=Whittington|first1=Harry Blackmore|last2=Briggs|first2=Derek Ernest Gilmor|date=1985-05-14|title=The largest Cambrian animal, ''Anomalocaris'', Burgess Shale, British-Columbia|url=https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.1985.0096|journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences|volume=309|issue=1141|pages=569–609|doi=10.1098/rstb.1985.0096|bibcode=1985RSPTB.309..569W}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Usami|first=Yoshiyuki|date=2006-01-07|title=Theoretical study on the body form and swimming pattern of Anomalocaris based on hydrodynamic simulation|journal=Journal of Theoretical Biology|volume=238|issue=1|pages=11–17|doi=10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.05.008|issn=0022-5193|pmid=16002096|bibcode=2006JThBi.238...11U}}</ref> Pairs of dorsal flaps, which make up a tail fan in some species, may have helped steering and/or stabilizing the animal during locomotion.<ref name="vanroy2015" /><ref name=":12" /> In ''[[Anomalocaris]]'', morphology of the tail fan even suggests it could rapidly change its swimming direction efficiently.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Sheppard|first1=K. A.|last2=Rival|first2=D. E.|last3=Caron|first3=J.-B.|date=2018-10-01|title=On the Hydrodynamics of Anomalocaris Tail Fins|journal=Integrative and Comparative Biology|language=en|volume=58|issue=4|pages=703–711|doi=10.1093/icb/icy014|issn=1540-7063|pmid=29697774|doi-access=free|hdl=1974/22737|hdl-access=free}}</ref> On the other hand, some hurdiids have features significantly specialized for a nektobenthic lifestyle, such as ''[[Cambroraster]]'' with its dome-like H-element similar to the [[carapace]] of a [[horseshoe crab]].<ref name=":1" /> Bands of setal blades with wrinkling lanceolate blades may have increased the surface area, suggesting they were [[gills]], providing the animal's [[respiratory]] function.<ref name="daley2014" /><ref name="vanroy2015" /> Abundance of the remains of scleritzed structures such as disarticulated frontal appendages and head sclerite complexes, suggest that mass [[moulting]] events may have occurred among radiodonts,<ref name="vanroy2015" /><ref name=":1" /> a behavior which also has been reported in some other [[Cambrian]] arthropods such as [[trilobites]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Daley|first1=Allison|last2=Drage|first2=Harriet|date=2015-09-01|title=The fossil record of ecdysis, and trends in the moulting behaviour of trilobites|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282594514|journal=Arthropod Structure & Development|volume=45|issue=2|doi=10.1016/j.asd.2015.09.004|pmid=26431634|pages=71–96|doi-access=free}}</ref>
Radiodonts were interpreted as [[nektonic]] or [[nektobenthic]] animals, with their morphology suggesting an active swimming lifestyle. The muscular, overlapping ventral flaps may have propelled the animal through the water, possibly by moving in a wave-like formation resembling modern [[Batoidea|rays]] and [[cuttlefish]].<ref name=":31">{{Cite journal|last1=Whittington|first1=Harry Blackmore|last2=Briggs|first2=Derek Ernest Gilmor|date=14 May 1985|title=The largest Cambrian animal, ''Anomalocaris'', Burgess Shale, British-Columbia|url=https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.1985.0096|journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences|volume=309|issue=1141|pages=569–609|doi=10.1098/rstb.1985.0096|bibcode=1985RSPTB.309..569W}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Usami|first=Yoshiyuki|date=7 January 2006|title=Theoretical study on the body form and swimming pattern of Anomalocaris based on hydrodynamic simulation|journal=Journal of Theoretical Biology|volume=238|issue=1|pages=11–17|doi=10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.05.008|issn=0022-5193|pmid=16002096|bibcode=2006JThBi.238...11U}}</ref> Pairs of dorsal flaps, which make up a tail fan in some species, may have helped steering and/or stabilizing the animal during locomotion.<ref name="vanroy2015" /><ref name=":12" /> In ''[[Anomalocaris]]'', morphology of the tail fan even suggests it could rapidly change its swimming direction efficiently.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Sheppard|first1=K. A.|last2=Rival|first2=D. E.|last3=Caron|first3=J.-B.|date=1 October 2018|title=On the Hydrodynamics of Anomalocaris Tail Fins|journal=Integrative and Comparative Biology|language=en|volume=58|issue=4|pages=703–711|doi=10.1093/icb/icy014|issn=1540-7063|pmid=29697774|doi-access=free|hdl=1974/22737|hdl-access=free}}</ref> On the other hand, some hurdiids have features significantly specialized for a nektobenthic lifestyle, such as ''[[Cambroraster]]'' with its dome-like H-element similar to the [[carapace]] of a [[horseshoe crab]].<ref name=":1" /> Bands of setal blades with wrinkling lanceolate blades may have increased the surface area, suggesting they were [[gills]], providing the animal's [[respiratory]] function.<ref name="daley2014" /><ref name="vanroy2015" /> Abundance of the remains of scleritzed structures such as disarticulated frontal appendages and head sclerite complexes, suggest that mass [[moulting]] events may have occurred among radiodonts,<ref name="vanroy2015" /><ref name=":1" /> a behavior which also has been reported in some other [[Cambrian]] arthropods such as [[trilobites]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Daley|first1=Allison|last2=Drage|first2=Harriet|date=1 September 2015|title=The fossil record of ecdysis, and trends in the moulting behaviour of trilobites|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282594514|journal=Arthropod Structure & Development|volume=45|issue=2|doi=10.1016/j.asd.2015.09.004|pmid=26431634|pages=71–96|doi-access=free}}</ref>


=== Diet ===
=== Diet ===
Line 132: Line 146:
}}
}}


Radiodonts had diverse feeding strategies, which could be categorized as [[raptorial]] [[Predation|predators]], sediment sifters, or suspension, [[filter feeders]].<ref name=":6" /><ref name=":15">{{Cite web|last1=De Vivo |first1=Giacinto |last2=Lautenschlager |first2=Stephan |last3=Vinther |first3=Jakob |date=2016-12-16 |title=Reconstructing anomalocaridid feeding appendage dexterity sheds light on radiodontan ecology|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325343898}}</ref><ref name=":5" /><ref name=":27" /><ref name=":28">{{Cite journal|last1=Caron|first1=J.-B.|last2=Moysiuk|first2=J.|date=2021|title=A giant nektobenthic radiodont from the Burgess Shale and the significance of hurdiid carapace diversity|journal=Royal Society Open Science|volume=8|issue=9|pages=210664|doi=10.1098/rsos.210664|pmc=8424305|pmid=34527273|bibcode=2021RSOS....810664C}}</ref> For example, raptorial predators like ''[[Anomalocaris]]'' and [[Amplectobeluidae|Amplectobeluids]] might have been able to catch agile prey by using their raptorial frontal appendages; the latter even bore a robust endite for holding prey like a [[Chela (organ)|pincer]].<ref name=":4" /><ref name=":16">{{Cite journal|last1=Daley|first1=Allison C.|last2=Budd|first2=Graham E.|date=2010|title=New anomalocaridid appendages from the Burgess Shale, Canada |journal=Palaeontology |language=en |volume=53 |issue=4 |pages=721–738 |doi=10.1111/j.1475-4983.2010.00955.x |bibcode=2010Palgy..53..721D |issn=1475-4983|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":2" /><ref name=":5" /> With the smaller head carapace complex and large surface of arthrodial membranes, frontal appendages of these taxa had greater flexibility.<ref name=":13"/> Stout frontal appendages of sediment sifters like ''[[Hurdia]]'' and ''[[Peytoia]]'' have serrated endites with mesial curvature, which could form a basket-like trap for raking through sediment and passing food items towards the well-developed oral cone.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":5" /> Endites of frontal appendages from suspension/filter feeders like ''[[Tamisiocaris]]'' and ''[[Aegirocassis]]'' have flexible, densely-packed auxiliary spines, which could filter out organic components such as [[mesozooplankton]] and [[phytoplankton]] down to 0.5mm.<ref name="vinther2014" /><ref name="vanroy2015" /> Frontal appendages of ''[[Caryosyntrips]]'', which are unusual for radiodonts in having the direction of endite-bearing surfaces opposing one another and may have been able to manipulate and crush prey in a scissor-like slicing or grasping motion.<ref name=":16" /><ref name=":35">{{Cite journal |last1=Pates |first1=S. |last2=Daley |first2=A. C. |date=2017 |title=''Caryosyntrips'': a radiodontan from the Cambrian of Spain, USA and Canada |url=https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:2e8264d8-6b2b-4851-81f6-a0d3e57f3db0 |journal=Papers in Palaeontology |language=en |volume=3 |issue=3 |pages=461–470 |doi=10.1002/spp2.1084 |s2cid=135026011 |issn=2056-2802}}</ref>
Radiodonts had diverse feeding strategies, which could be categorized as [[raptorial]] [[Predation|predators]], sediment sifters, or suspension, [[filter feeders]].<ref name=":6" /><ref name=":15">{{Cite web|last1=De Vivo |first1=Giacinto |last2=Lautenschlager |first2=Stephan |last3=Vinther |first3=Jakob |date=16 December 2016 |title=Reconstructing anomalocaridid feeding appendage dexterity sheds light on radiodontan ecology|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325343898}}</ref><ref name=":5" /><ref name=":27" /><ref name=":28">{{Cite journal|last1=Caron|first1=J.-B.|last2=Moysiuk|first2=J.|date=2021|title=A giant nektobenthic radiodont from the Burgess Shale and the significance of hurdiid carapace diversity|journal=Royal Society Open Science|volume=8|issue=9|pages=210664|doi=10.1098/rsos.210664|pmc=8424305|pmid=34527273|bibcode=2021RSOS....810664C}}</ref> For example, raptorial predators like ''[[Anomalocaris]]'' and [[Amplectobeluidae|Amplectobeluids]] might have been able to catch agile prey by using their raptorial frontal appendages; the latter even bore a robust endite for holding prey like a [[Chela (organ)|pincer]].<ref name=":4" /><ref name=":16">{{Cite journal|last1=Daley|first1=Allison C.|last2=Budd|first2=Graham E.|date=2010|title=New anomalocaridid appendages from the Burgess Shale, Canada |journal=Palaeontology |language=en |volume=53 |issue=4 |pages=721–738 |doi=10.1111/j.1475-4983.2010.00955.x |bibcode=2010Palgy..53..721D |issn=1475-4983|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":2" /><ref name=":5" /> With the smaller head carapace complex and large surface of arthrodial membranes, frontal appendages of these taxa had greater flexibility.<ref name=":13"/> Stout frontal appendages of sediment sifters like ''[[Hurdia]]'' and ''[[Peytoia]]'' have serrated endites with mesial curvature, which could form a basket-like trap for raking through sediment and passing food items towards the well-developed oral cone.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":5" /> Endites of frontal appendages from suspension/filter feeders like ''[[Tamisiocaris]]'' and ''[[Aegirocassis]]'' have flexible, densely-packed auxiliary spines, which could filter out organic components such as [[mesozooplankton]] and [[phytoplankton]] down to 0.5mm.<ref name="vinther2014" /><ref name="vanroy2015" /> Frontal appendages of ''[[Caryosyntrips]]'', which are unusual for radiodonts in having the direction of endite-bearing surfaces opposing one another and may have been able to manipulate and crush prey in a scissor-like slicing or grasping motion.<ref name=":16" /><ref name=":35">{{Cite journal |last1=Pates |first1=S. |last2=Daley |first2=A. C. |date=2017 |title=''Caryosyntrips'': a radiodontan from the Cambrian of Spain, USA and Canada |url=https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:2e8264d8-6b2b-4851-81f6-a0d3e57f3db0 |journal=Papers in Palaeontology |language=en |volume=3 |issue=3 |pages=461–470 |doi=10.1002/spp2.1084 |s2cid=135026011 |issn=2056-2802}}</ref>


Oral cones of radiodonts may have been used for suction and/or biting.<ref name=":14" /><ref name=":15" /><ref name=":1" /> Together with the great variety of frontal appendages in different species of radiodonts, differentiation of oral cones between species suggests preferences of different diets as well.<ref name=":15" /><ref name=":5" /> For example, the triradial oral cone of ''[[Anomalocaris]]'' with irregular, tuberculated toothplates and a small opening may have been adapted to small and nektonic prey,<ref name=":14" /><ref name=":5" /> while the rigid tetraradial oral cones of ''[[Peytoia]]'', ''[[Titanokorys]]'', ''[[Hurdia]]'', and one isolated oral cone attributed to ''[[Cambroraster]]'' with a larger opening and sometimes additional tooth plates may have been capable to consume larger food items relative to their body size and probably benthic or endobenthic prey.<ref name=":14" /><ref name=":15" /><ref name=":1" />
Oral cones of radiodonts may have been used for suction and/or biting.<ref name=":14" /><ref name=":15" /><ref name=":1" /> Together with the great variety of frontal appendages in different species of radiodonts, differentiation of oral cones between species suggests preferences of different diets as well.<ref name=":15" /><ref name=":5" /> For example, the triradial oral cone of ''[[Anomalocaris]]'' with irregular, tuberculated toothplates and a small opening may have been adapted to small and nektonic prey,<ref name=":14" /><ref name=":5" /> while the rigid tetraradial oral cones of ''[[Peytoia]]'', ''[[Titanokorys]]'', ''[[Hurdia]]'', and one isolated oral cone attributed to ''[[Cambroraster]]'' with a larger opening and sometimes additional tooth plates may have been capable to consume larger food items relative to their body size and probably benthic or endobenthic prey.<ref name=":14" /><ref name=":15" /><ref name=":1" />
Line 163: Line 177:
<gallery mode="packed" heights="100">
<gallery mode="packed" heights="100">
File:20220213 Opabiniidae Opabiniids.png|The [[Opabiniidae|opabiniids]] ''[[Opabinia]]'' (top) and ''[[Utaurora]]'' (bottom), were close relatives of the radiodonts
File:20220213 Opabiniidae Opabiniids.png|The [[Opabiniidae|opabiniids]] ''[[Opabinia]]'' (top) and ''[[Utaurora]]'' (bottom), were close relatives of the radiodonts
File:20210310 Kylinxia zhangi.png|The radiodont/[[opabiniid]]-[[euarthropod]] intermediate ''[[Kylinxia]]'', shares many of the characteristics found in both dinocaridids and euarthropods
File:20210310 Kylinxia zhangi.png|The presumed radiodont/[[opabiniid]]-[[euarthropod]] intermediate ''[[Kylinxia]]'', shares many of the characteristics found in both dinocaridids and euarthropods — later studies have considered this relationship far less direct<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Izquierdo-López |first1=Alejandro |last2=Caron |first2=Jean-Bernard |title=The problematic Cambrian arthropod Tuzoia and the origin of mandibulates revisited |journal=Royal Society Open Science |date=December 2022 |volume=9 |issue=12 |doi=10.1098/rsos.220933 |url=https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rsos.220933 |language=en |issn=2054-5703}}</ref>
File:Erratus.png|A life reconstruction of the basal [[Deuteropoda|deuteropod]] ''[[Erratus]]'', which helped reveal the evolution of arthropod trunk appendages
File:Erratus.png|A life reconstruction of the basal [[Deuteropoda|deuteropod]] ''[[Erratus]]'', which helped reveal the evolution of arthropod trunk appendages
File:20221119 Mieridduryn bonniae diagrammatic reconstruction.png|''[[Mieridduryn]]'' is a dinocaridid [[Panarthropoda|panarthropod]] from the [[Middle Ordovician]] that shares traits with both opabiniids and radiodonts
File:20221119 Mieridduryn bonniae diagrammatic reconstruction.png|''[[Mieridduryn]]'' is a dinocaridid [[Panarthropoda|panarthropod]] from the [[Middle Ordovician]] that shares traits with both opabiniids and radiodonts
</gallery>
</gallery>


Most [[phylogenetic]] analyses suggest that radiodonts, alongside [[Opabiniidae|opabiniids]] (''[[Opabinia]]'' and ''[[Utaurora]]''<ref name=":22" />), are [[stem-group]] [[arthropods]] just basal to [[deuteropoda]],<ref name=":11">{{Cite journal|last=Ortega-Hernández|first=Javier|date=Dec 2014|title=Making sense of 'lower' and 'upper' stem-group Euarthropoda, with comments on the strict use of the name Arthropoda von Siebold, 1848|journal=Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society|volume=91|issue=1|pages=255–273|doi=10.1111/brv.12168|issn=1469-185X|pmid=25528950|s2cid=7751936}}</ref> a clade including upper stem (e.g. [[fuxianhuiid]]s and bivalved arthropods) and crown [[Euarthropoda]] (e.g. [[Artiopoda]], [[Chelicerata]] and [[Mandibulata]]).<ref name="daley2009" /><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Edgecombe|first=Gregory D.|date=2010-03-01|title=Arthropod phylogeny: An overview from the perspectives of morphology, molecular data and the fossil record|url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467803909000541|journal=Arthropod Structure & Development|series=Fossil Record and Phylogeny of the Arthropoda|language=en|volume=39|issue=2|pages=74–87|doi=10.1016/j.asd.2009.10.002|pmid=19854297|issn=1467-8039}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Legg|first1=David|last2=Sutton|first2=Mark|last3=Edgecombe|first3=Gregory|last4=Caron|first4=Jean-Bernard|date=2012-10-10|title=Cambrian bivalved arthropod reveals origin of arthrodization|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232231696|journal=Proceedings. Biological Sciences |volume=279|issue=1748|pages=4699–4704|doi=10.1098/rspb.2012.1958|pmid=23055069|pmc=3497099}}</ref><ref name="Legg 2013 493–501">{{Cite journal|last=Legg|first=David|date=2013|title=Multi-Segmented Arthropods from the Middle Cambrian of British Columbia (Canada)|url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-paleontology/article/abs/multisegmented-arthropods-from-the-middle-cambrian-of-british-columbia-canada/9CA5AE5D58832452EDA388ED438774CB|journal=Journal of Paleontology|language=en|volume=87|issue=3|pages=493–501|doi=10.1666/12-112.1|s2cid=86725173|issn=0022-3360}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Legg|first1=David|last2=Sutton|first2=Mark|last3=Edgecombe|first3=Gregory|date=2013-09-30|title=Arthropod fossil data increase congruence of morphological and molecular phylogenies|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257205419|journal=Nature Communications|volume=4|pages=2485|doi=10.1038/ncomms3485|pmid=24077329|bibcode=2013NatCo...4.2485L|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Legg|first1=David A.|last2=Vannier|first2=Jean|date=2013|title=The affinities of the cosmopolitan arthropod Isoxys and its implications for the origin of arthropods|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/let.12032|journal=Lethaia|language=en|volume=46|issue=4|pages=540–550|doi=10.1111/let.12032|issn=1502-3931}}</ref><ref name="vinther2014" /><ref name="cong2014" /><ref name="vanroy2015" /><ref name=":6" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":26" /><ref name=":18" /><ref name=":27" /><ref name=":28" /><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=O’Flynn|first1=Robert J.|last2=Williams|first2=Mark|last3=Yu|first3=Mengxiao|last4=Harvey|first4=Thomas H. P.|last5=Liu|first5=Yu|date=2022|title=A new euarthropod with large frontal appendages from the early Cambrian Chengjiang biota|url=https://palaeo-electronica.org/content/2022/3551-a-new-chengjiang-euarthropod|journal=Palaeontologia Electronica|language=English|volume=25|issue=1|pages=1–21|doi=10.26879/1167|s2cid=246779634|issn=1094-8074|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":30" /><ref name=":22">{{Cite journal|last1=Pates|first1=Stephen|last2=Wolfe|first2=Joanna M.|last3=Lerosey-Aubril|first3=Rudy|last4=Daley|first4=Allison C.|last5=Ortega-Hernández|first5=Javier|date=2022-02-09|title=New opabiniid diversifies the weirdest wonders of the euarthropod stem group|journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences|volume=289|issue=1968|pages=20212093|doi=10.1098/rspb.2021.2093|pmc=8826304|pmid=35135344}}</ref> This interpretation is supported by numerous arthropod groundplan found on radiodonts and opabiniids, such as [[Eyestalk|stalked]] [[compound eye]]s,<ref name=":9" /> digestive glands,<ref name=":10" /> trunk appendages forming by dorsal and ventral elements (precursor of arthropod biramous appendages).<ref name="vanroy2015" /><ref name=":30" /> Compared to opabiniids, which possess posterior mouth opening and fused frontalmost appendages (comparable to euarthropod posterior-facing [[Labrum (arthropod mouthpart)|labrum]]/hypostome complex),<ref name=":8" /><ref name=":22" /> radiodonts on the other hand featured euarthropod-like dorsal sclerite (H-element) and arthropodization (frontal appendages) on their head regions,<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Ortega-Hernández|first=Javier|date=2015-06-15|title=Homology of Head Sclerites in Burgess Shale Euarthropods|journal=Current Biology|volume=25|issue=12|pages=1625–1631|doi=10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.034|issn=0960-9822|pmid=25959966|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":8" /><ref name=":22" /> alongside [[Cuticle|cuticularized]] gut termini.<ref name="daley2014" /> The fact that both radiodonts and opabiniids lack exoskeleton on their trunk region suggests that the origin of compound eyes and arthropodization (segmented appendages) precede arthrodization (full set of trunk exoskeleton) in the arthropod stem lineage.<ref name=":11" /><ref name=":32">{{Cite journal|last1=Giribet|first1=Gonzalo|last2=Edgecombe|first2=Gregory D.|date=2019-06-17|title=The Phylogeny and Evolutionary History of Arthropods|journal=Current Biology|language=English|volume=29|issue=12|pages=R592–R602|doi=10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.057|issn=0960-9822|pmid=31211983|s2cid=189926344|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":33">{{Cite journal|last=Edgecombe|first=Gregory D.|date=2020-11-02|title=Arthropod Origins: Integrating Paleontological and Molecular Evidence|url=https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-011720-124437|journal=Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics|volume=51|issue=1|pages=1–25|doi=10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-011720-124437|s2cid=225478171|issn=1543-592X}}</ref> The constricted neck region with feeding appendicular structures of some radiodont may also shed light on the origin of the sophisticated arthropod head, which was formed by the fusion of multiple anterior body segments.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":8" /> Basal deuteropods that possess a mixture of radiodont/opabiniid characters like ''[[Kylinxia]]'' and ''[[Erratus]]'', may represent intermediate forms between radiodonts, opabiniids and other euarthropods.<ref name=":18" /><ref name=":30">{{Cite journal|last1=Fu|first1=Dongjing|last2=Legg|first2=David A.|last3=Daley|first3=Allison C.|last4=Budd|first4=Graham E.|last5=Wu|first5=Yu|last6=Zhang|first6=Xingliang|date=2022-03-28|title=The evolution of biramous appendages revealed by a carapace-bearing Cambrian arthropod|journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences|volume=377|issue=1847|pages=20210034|doi=10.1098/rstb.2021.0034|pmid=35125000|pmc=8819368 |s2cid=246608509}}</ref>
Most [[phylogenetic]] analyses suggest that radiodonts, alongside [[Opabiniidae|opabiniids]] (''[[Opabinia]]'' and ''[[Utaurora]]''<ref name=":22" />), are [[stem-group]] [[arthropods]] just basal to [[deuteropoda]],<ref name=":11">{{Cite journal|last=Ortega-Hernández|first=Javier|date=Dec 2014|title=Making sense of 'lower' and 'upper' stem-group Euarthropoda, with comments on the strict use of the name Arthropoda von Siebold, 1848|journal=Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society|volume=91|issue=1|pages=255–273|doi=10.1111/brv.12168|issn=1469-185X|pmid=25528950|s2cid=7751936}}</ref> a clade including upper stem (e.g. [[fuxianhuiid]]s and bivalved arthropods) and crown [[Euarthropoda]] (e.g. [[Artiopoda]], [[Chelicerata]] and [[Mandibulata]]).<ref name="daley2009" /><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Edgecombe|first=Gregory D.|date=1 March 2010|title=Arthropod phylogeny: An overview from the perspectives of morphology, molecular data and the fossil record|url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467803909000541|journal=Arthropod Structure & Development|series=Fossil Record and Phylogeny of the Arthropoda|language=en|volume=39|issue=2|pages=74–87|doi=10.1016/j.asd.2009.10.002|pmid=19854297|issn=1467-8039}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Legg|first1=David|last2=Sutton|first2=Mark|last3=Edgecombe|first3=Gregory|last4=Caron|first4=Jean-Bernard|date=10 October 2012|title=Cambrian bivalved arthropod reveals origin of arthrodization|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232231696|journal=Proceedings. Biological Sciences |volume=279|issue=1748|pages=4699–4704|doi=10.1098/rspb.2012.1958|pmid=23055069|pmc=3497099}}</ref><ref name="Legg 2013 493–501">{{Cite journal|last=Legg|first=David|date=2013|title=Multi-Segmented Arthropods from the Middle Cambrian of British Columbia (Canada)|url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-paleontology/article/abs/multisegmented-arthropods-from-the-middle-cambrian-of-british-columbia-canada/9CA5AE5D58832452EDA388ED438774CB|journal=Journal of Paleontology|language=en|volume=87|issue=3|pages=493–501|doi=10.1666/12-112.1|s2cid=86725173|issn=0022-3360}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Legg|first1=David|last2=Sutton|first2=Mark|last3=Edgecombe|first3=Gregory|date=30 September 2013|title=Arthropod fossil data increase congruence of morphological and molecular phylogenies|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257205419|journal=Nature Communications|volume=4|pages=2485|doi=10.1038/ncomms3485|pmid=24077329|bibcode=2013NatCo...4.2485L|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Legg|first1=David A.|last2=Vannier|first2=Jean|date=2013|title=The affinities of the cosmopolitan arthropod Isoxys and its implications for the origin of arthropods|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/let.12032|journal=Lethaia|language=en|volume=46|issue=4|pages=540–550|doi=10.1111/let.12032|issn=1502-3931}}</ref><ref name="vinther2014" /><ref name="cong2014" /><ref name="vanroy2015" /><ref name=":6" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":26" /><ref name=":18" /><ref name=":27" /><ref name=":28" /><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=O’Flynn|first1=Robert J.|last2=Williams|first2=Mark|last3=Yu|first3=Mengxiao|last4=Harvey|first4=Thomas H. P.|last5=Liu|first5=Yu|date=2022|title=A new euarthropod with large frontal appendages from the early Cambrian Chengjiang biota|url=https://palaeo-electronica.org/content/2022/3551-a-new-chengjiang-euarthropod|journal=Palaeontologia Electronica|language=English|volume=25|issue=1|pages=1–21|doi=10.26879/1167|s2cid=246779634|issn=1094-8074|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":30" /><ref name=":22">{{Cite journal|last1=Pates|first1=Stephen|last2=Wolfe|first2=Joanna M.|last3=Lerosey-Aubril|first3=Rudy|last4=Daley|first4=Allison C.|last5=Ortega-Hernández|first5=Javier|date=9 February 2022|title=New opabiniid diversifies the weirdest wonders of the euarthropod stem group|journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences|volume=289|issue=1968|pages=20212093|doi=10.1098/rspb.2021.2093|pmc=8826304|pmid=35135344}}</ref> This interpretation is supported by numerous arthropod groundplan found on radiodonts and opabiniids, such as [[Eyestalk|stalked]] [[compound eye]]s,<ref name=":9" /> digestive glands,<ref name=":10" /> trunk appendages forming by dorsal and ventral elements (precursor of arthropod biramous appendages).<ref name="vanroy2015" /><ref name=":30" /> Compared to opabiniids, which possess posterior mouth opening and fused frontalmost appendages (comparable to euarthropod posterior-facing [[Labrum (arthropod mouthpart)|labrum]]/hypostome complex),<ref name=":8" /><ref name=":22" /> radiodonts on the other hand featured euarthropod-like dorsal sclerite (H-element) and arthropodization (frontal appendages) on their head regions,<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Ortega-Hernández|first=Javier|date=15 June 2015|title=Homology of Head Sclerites in Burgess Shale Euarthropods|journal=Current Biology|volume=25|issue=12|pages=1625–1631|doi=10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.034|issn=0960-9822|pmid=25959966|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":8" /><ref name=":22" /> alongside [[Cuticle|cuticularized]] gut termini.<ref name="daley2014" /> The fact that both radiodonts and opabiniids lack exoskeleton on their trunk region suggests that the origin of compound eyes and arthropodization (segmented appendages) precede arthrodization (full set of trunk exoskeleton) in the arthropod stem lineage.<ref name=":11" /><ref name=":32">{{Cite journal|last1=Giribet|first1=Gonzalo|last2=Edgecombe|first2=Gregory D.|date=17 June 2019|title=The Phylogeny and Evolutionary History of Arthropods|journal=Current Biology|language=English|volume=29|issue=12|pages=R592–R602|doi=10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.057|issn=0960-9822|pmid=31211983|s2cid=189926344|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":33">{{Cite journal|last=Edgecombe|first=Gregory D.|date=2 November 2020|title=Arthropod Origins: Integrating Paleontological and Molecular Evidence|url=https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-011720-124437|journal=Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics|volume=51|issue=1|pages=1–25|doi=10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-011720-124437|s2cid=225478171|issn=1543-592X}}</ref> The constricted neck region with feeding appendicular structures of some radiodont may also shed light on the origin of the sophisticated arthropod head, which was formed by the fusion of multiple anterior body segments.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":8" /> Basal deuteropods that possess a mixture of radiodont/opabiniid characters like ''[[Kylinxia]]'' and ''[[Erratus]]'', may represent intermediate forms between radiodonts, opabiniids and other euarthropods.<ref name=":18" /><ref name=":30">{{Cite journal|last1=Fu|first1=Dongjing|last2=Legg|first2=David A.|last3=Daley|first3=Allison C.|last4=Budd|first4=Graham E.|last5=Wu|first5=Yu|last6=Zhang|first6=Xingliang|date=28 March 2022|title=The evolution of biramous appendages revealed by a carapace-bearing Cambrian arthropod|journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences|volume=377|issue=1847|pages=20210034|doi=10.1098/rstb.2021.0034|pmid=35125000|pmc=8819368 |s2cid=246608509}}</ref>


<gallery mode="packed" heights="120">
<gallery mode="packed" heights="120">
Line 176: Line 190:
</gallery>
</gallery>


Taxa just basal to the radiodont, opabiniid and euarthropod branch are '[[Lobopodia#Gilled lobopodians|gilled lobopodians]]' like ''[[Pambdelurion]]'' and ''[[Kerygmachela]]'', which occasionally united under the class [[Dinocaridida]] with opabibiids and radiodonts.<ref name=":21">{{Citation|last1=Xianguang|first1=Hou|title=Dinocaridids – anomalous arthropods or arthropod-like worms?|date=2006|last2=Jan|first2=Jan Bergström|last3=Jiayu|first3=In Rong|last4=Zongjie|first4=Fang|last5=Zhanghe|first5=Zhou|last6=Renbin|first6=Zhan|last7=Xiangdong|first7=Wang|last8=Xunlai|first8=Yuan|last9=Xianguang|first9=Hou|citeseerx=10.1.1.693.5869}}</ref><ref name="Legg 2013 493–501"/> They have body flaps, digestive glands, large (presumely compound) eyes and specialized frontal appendages like the former taxa, but their frontal appendages are not arthropodized nor fused, eyes sessile, gill-like structures less prominent, and certainlly bore lobopod underneath each of their flaps.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Budd|first=Graham E.|date=1998|title=The morphology and phylogenetic significance of Kerygmachela kierkegaardi Budd (Buen Formation, Lower Cambrian, N Greenland)|url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/earth-and-environmental-science-transactions-of-royal-society-of-edinburgh/article/abs/morphology-and-phylogenetic-significance-of-kerygmachela-kierkegaardi-budd-buen-formation-lower-cambrian-n-greenland/AF165229724342F0BD90933A037CB05F|journal=Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh|language=en|volume=89|issue=4|pages=249–290|doi=10.1017/S0263593300002418|s2cid=85645934 |issn=1473-7116}}</ref><ref name="vanroy2015" /><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Young|first1=Fletcher J.|last2=Vinther|first2=Jakob|date=2017|title=Onychophoran-like myoanatomy of the Cambrian gilled lobopodian Pambdelurion whittingtoni|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/pala.12269|journal=Palaeontology|language=en|volume=60|issue=1|pages=27–54|doi=10.1111/pala.12269|bibcode=2017Palgy..60...27Y |hdl=1983/92180ef0-2205-4c65-9a70-90d59cfea2f4 |s2cid=55477207 |issn=1475-4983|hdl-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":22" /> Taxa even basal to 'gilled lobopodians' are siberiids like ''[[Megadictyon]]'' and ''[[Jianshanopodia]]'',<ref name=":11" /> a group of [[lobopodia]]ns that bore robust frontal appendages and digestive glands, but no body flaps. Such intermediate forms between lobopodian and radiodont/euarthropod suggest that the total-group Arthropoda arose from a [[paraphyletic]] lobopodian grade, alongside the other two extant [[panarthropod]] phyla [[Tardigrada]] and [[Onychophora]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Edgecombe|first=Gregory D.|date=2010|title=Arthropod phylogeny: An overview from the perspectives of morphology, molecular data and the fossil record|url=https://www.academia.edu/15185231|journal=Arthropod Structure & Development|volume=39|issue=2–3|pages=74–87|doi=10.1016/j.asd.2009.10.002|pmid=19854297|issn=1467-8039}}</ref><ref name=":11" /><ref name=":8" /><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Daley|first1=Allison C.|last2=Antcliffe|first2=Jonathan B.|last3=Drage|first3=Harriet B.|last4=Pates|first4=Stephen|date=2018-05-22|title=Early fossil record of Euarthropoda and the Cambrian Explosion|journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|language=en|volume=115|issue=21|pages=5323–5331|doi=10.1073/pnas.1719962115|issn=0027-8424|pmc=6003487|pmid=29784780|bibcode=2018PNAS..115.5323D|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":32" /><ref name=":33" />
Taxa just basal to the radiodont, opabiniid and euarthropod branch are '[[Lobopodia#Gilled lobopodians|gilled lobopodians]]' like ''[[Pambdelurion]]'' and ''[[Kerygmachela]]'', which occasionally united under the class [[Dinocaridida]] with opabibiids and radiodonts.<ref name=":21">{{Citation|last1=Xianguang|first1=Hou|title=Dinocaridids – anomalous arthropods or arthropod-like worms?|date=2006|last2=Jan|first2=Jan Bergström|last3=Jiayu|first3=In Rong|last4=Zongjie|first4=Fang|last5=Zhanghe|first5=Zhou|last6=Renbin|first6=Zhan|last7=Xiangdong|first7=Wang|last8=Xunlai|first8=Yuan|last9=Xianguang|first9=Hou|citeseerx=10.1.1.693.5869}}</ref><ref name="Legg 2013 493–501"/> They have body flaps, digestive glands, large (presumely compound) eyes and specialized frontal appendages like the former taxa, but their frontal appendages are not arthropodized nor fused, eyes sessile, gill-like structures less prominent, and certainly bore lobopod underneath each of their flaps.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Budd|first=Graham E.|date=1998|title=The morphology and phylogenetic significance of Kerygmachela kierkegaardi Budd (Buen Formation, Lower Cambrian, N Greenland)|url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/earth-and-environmental-science-transactions-of-royal-society-of-edinburgh/article/abs/morphology-and-phylogenetic-significance-of-kerygmachela-kierkegaardi-budd-buen-formation-lower-cambrian-n-greenland/AF165229724342F0BD90933A037CB05F|journal=Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh|language=en|volume=89|issue=4|pages=249–290|doi=10.1017/S0263593300002418|s2cid=85645934 |issn=1473-7116}}</ref><ref name="vanroy2015" /><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Young|first1=Fletcher J.|last2=Vinther|first2=Jakob|date=2017|title=Onychophoran-like myoanatomy of the Cambrian gilled lobopodian Pambdelurion whittingtoni|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/pala.12269|journal=Palaeontology|language=en|volume=60|issue=1|pages=27–54|doi=10.1111/pala.12269|bibcode=2017Palgy..60...27Y |hdl=1983/92180ef0-2205-4c65-9a70-90d59cfea2f4 |s2cid=55477207 |issn=1475-4983|hdl-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":22" /> Taxa even basal to 'gilled lobopodians' are siberiids like ''[[Megadictyon]]'' and ''[[Jianshanopodia]]'',<ref name=":11" /> a group of [[lobopodia]]ns that bore robust frontal appendages and digestive glands, but no body flaps. Such intermediate forms between lobopodian and radiodont/euarthropod suggest that the total-group Arthropoda arose from a [[paraphyletic]] lobopodian grade, alongside the other two extant [[panarthropod]] phyla [[Tardigrada]] and [[Onychophora]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Edgecombe|first=Gregory D.|date=2010|title=Arthropod phylogeny: An overview from the perspectives of morphology, molecular data and the fossil record|url=https://www.academia.edu/15185231|journal=Arthropod Structure & Development|volume=39|issue=2–3|pages=74–87|doi=10.1016/j.asd.2009.10.002|pmid=19854297|issn=1467-8039}}</ref><ref name=":11" /><ref name=":8" /><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Daley|first1=Allison C.|last2=Antcliffe|first2=Jonathan B.|last3=Drage|first3=Harriet B.|last4=Pates|first4=Stephen|date=22 May 2018|title=Early fossil record of Euarthropoda and the Cambrian Explosion|journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|language=en|volume=115|issue=21|pages=5323–5331|doi=10.1073/pnas.1719962115|issn=0027-8424|pmc=6003487|pmid=29784780|bibcode=2018PNAS..115.5323D|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":32" /><ref name=":33" />


Previous studies may suggest radiodonts as a group other than stem-arthropods, such as a hitherto unknown [[phylum]];<ref name=":31" /> [[cycloneuralia]]<nowiki/>n worms undergone [[Convergent evolution|convergent]] with arthropods (based on the cycloneuralian-like radial mouthparts);<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Xian-Guang|first1=Hou|last2=Bergström|first2=Jan|last3=Ahlberg|first3=Per|date=September 1995|title=Anomalocaris and other large animals in the lower Cambrian Chengjiang fauna of southwest China|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233050167|journal=GFF|language=en|volume=117|issue=3|pages=163–183|doi=10.1080/11035899509546213|issn=1103-5897}}</ref><ref name=":21" /> stem [[chelicerate]] euarthropods alongside [[megacheira]]<nowiki/>ns also known as great appendage arthropods (based on the similarity between radiodont frontal appendages, megacheiran great appendages and [[chelicerae]]);<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Haug|first1=Joachim T.|last2=Waloszek|first2=Dieter|last3=Maas|first3=Andreas|last4=Liu|first4=Yu|last5=Haug|first5=Carolin|date=March 2012|title=Functional morphology, ontogeny and evolution of mantis shrimp-like predators in the Cambrian: MANTIS SHRIMP-LIKE CAMBRIAN PREDATORS|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241247067|journal=Palaeontology|language=en|volume=55|issue=2|pages=369–399|doi=10.1111/j.1475-4983.2011.01124.x|s2cid=82841481 |doi-access=free}}</ref> or ''[[Schinderhannes (genus)|Schinderhannes bartelsi]],'' which resolved as a [[Hurdiidae|hurdiid]] radiodont in recent analyses,<ref name=":11" /><ref name="vinther2014" /><ref name="vanroy2015" /><ref name=":6" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":27" /><ref name=":28" /> as a species more closely related to euarthropods than other radiodonts (based on some putative euarthropod-like features found on ''Schinderhannes'').<ref name=":12">{{Cite journal|last1=Kühl|first1=Gabriele|last2=Briggs|first2=Derek E. G.|last3=Rust|first3=Jes|date=2009-02-06|title=A Great-Appendage Arthropod with a Radial Mouth from the Lower Devonian Hunsrück Slate, Germany|journal=Science|language=en|volume=323|issue=5915|pages=771–773|doi=10.1126/science.1166586|issn=0036-8075|pmid=19197061|bibcode=2009Sci...323..771K|s2cid=47555807}}</ref> However, neither each of them were supported by later investigations. The radial mouthparts are not cycloneuralian-exclusive and more likely present result of convergent evolution or [[ecdysozoa]]<nowiki/>n [[Plesiomorphy and symplesiomorphy|plesimorphy]], since they also have been found in [[panarthropods]] such as [[tardigrade]] and some [[lobopodia]]<nowiki/>ns;<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Smith|first1=Martin R.|last2=Caron|first2=Jean-Bernard|date=June 2015|title=Hallucigenia 's head and the pharyngeal armature of early ecdysozoans|journal=Nature|language=en|volume=523|issue=7558|pages=75–78|doi=10.1038/nature14573|issn=1476-4687|pmid=26106857|bibcode=2015Natur.523...75S|s2cid=205244325|url=http://dro.dur.ac.uk/20476/1/20476.pdf}}</ref> radiodonts lacking definitive euarthropod features such as trunk [[tergites]] and multiple head appendages,<ref name=":11" /> and the megacheiran great appendages were considered to be deutocerebral,<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Tanaka|first1=Gengo|last2=Hou|first2=Xianguang|last3=Ma|first3=Xiaoya|last4=Edgecombe|first4=Gregory D.|last5=Strausfeld|first5=Nicholas J.|date=October 2013|title=Chelicerate neural ground pattern in a Cambrian great appendage arthropod|journal=Nature|language=en|volume=502|issue=7471|pages=364–367|doi=10.1038/nature12520|issn=1476-4687|pmid=24132294|bibcode=2013Natur.502..364T|s2cid=4456458}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Ortega-Hernández|first1=Javier|last2=Lerosey-Aubril|first2=Rudy|last3=Pates|first3=Stephen|date=2019-12-18|title=Proclivity of nervous system preservation in Cambrian Burgess Shale-type deposits|journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences|volume=286|issue=1917|pages=20192370|doi=10.1098/rspb.2019.2370|pmid=31822253|pmc=6939931}}</ref> which could be non-homologous to the radiodont protocerebral frontal appendages;<ref name="cong2014" /><ref name=":8" /> putative euarthropod characters found on the single ''Schinderhannes'' fossil is questionable and may present other radiodont-like structures.<ref name=":11" />
Previous studies may suggest radiodonts as a group other than stem-arthropods, such as a hitherto unknown [[phylum]];<ref name=":31" /> [[cycloneuralia]]<nowiki/>n worms undergone [[Convergent evolution|convergent]] with arthropods (based on the cycloneuralian-like radial mouthparts);<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Xian-Guang|first1=Hou|last2=Bergström|first2=Jan|last3=Ahlberg|first3=Per|date=September 1995|title=Anomalocaris and other large animals in the lower Cambrian Chengjiang fauna of southwest China|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233050167|journal=GFF|language=en|volume=117|issue=3|pages=163–183|doi=10.1080/11035899509546213|issn=1103-5897}}</ref><ref name=":21" /> stem [[chelicerate]] euarthropods alongside [[megacheira]]<nowiki/>ns also known as great appendage arthropods (based on the similarity between radiodont frontal appendages, megacheiran great appendages and [[chelicerae]]);<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Haug|first1=Joachim T.|last2=Waloszek|first2=Dieter|last3=Maas|first3=Andreas|last4=Liu|first4=Yu|last5=Haug|first5=Carolin|date=March 2012|title=Functional morphology, ontogeny and evolution of mantis shrimp-like predators in the Cambrian: MANTIS SHRIMP-LIKE CAMBRIAN PREDATORS|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241247067|journal=Palaeontology|language=en|volume=55|issue=2|pages=369–399|doi=10.1111/j.1475-4983.2011.01124.x|s2cid=82841481 |doi-access=free}}</ref> or ''[[Schinderhannes (genus)|Schinderhannes bartelsi]],'' which resolved as a [[Hurdiidae|hurdiid]] radiodont in recent analyses,<ref name=":11" /><ref name="vinther2014" /><ref name="vanroy2015" /><ref name=":6" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":27" /><ref name=":28" /> as a species more closely related to euarthropods than other radiodonts (based on some putative euarthropod-like features found on ''Schinderhannes'').<ref name=":12">{{Cite journal|last1=Kühl|first1=Gabriele|last2=Briggs|first2=Derek E. G.|last3=Rust|first3=Jes|date=6 February 2009|title=A Great-Appendage Arthropod with a Radial Mouth from the Lower Devonian Hunsrück Slate, Germany|journal=Science|language=en|volume=323|issue=5915|pages=771–773|doi=10.1126/science.1166586|issn=0036-8075|pmid=19197061|bibcode=2009Sci...323..771K|s2cid=47555807}}</ref> However, neither each of them were supported by later investigations. The radial mouthparts are not cycloneuralian-exclusive and more likely present result of convergent evolution or [[ecdysozoa]]<nowiki/>n [[Plesiomorphy and symplesiomorphy|plesimorphy]], since they also have been found in [[panarthropods]] such as [[tardigrade]] and some [[lobopodia]]<nowiki/>ns;<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Smith|first1=Martin R.|last2=Caron|first2=Jean-Bernard|date=June 2015|title=Hallucigenia 's head and the pharyngeal armature of early ecdysozoans|journal=Nature|language=en|volume=523|issue=7558|pages=75–78|doi=10.1038/nature14573|issn=1476-4687|pmid=26106857|bibcode=2015Natur.523...75S|s2cid=205244325|url=http://dro.dur.ac.uk/20476/1/20476.pdf}}</ref> radiodonts lacking definitive euarthropod features such as trunk [[tergites]] and multiple head appendages,<ref name=":11" /> and the megacheiran great appendages were considered to be deutocerebral,<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Tanaka|first1=Gengo|last2=Hou|first2=Xianguang|last3=Ma|first3=Xiaoya|last4=Edgecombe|first4=Gregory D.|last5=Strausfeld|first5=Nicholas J.|date=October 2013|title=Chelicerate neural ground pattern in a Cambrian great appendage arthropod|journal=Nature|language=en|volume=502|issue=7471|pages=364–367|doi=10.1038/nature12520|issn=1476-4687|pmid=24132294|bibcode=2013Natur.502..364T|s2cid=4456458}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Ortega-Hernández|first1=Javier|last2=Lerosey-Aubril|first2=Rudy|last3=Pates|first3=Stephen|date=18 December 2019|title=Proclivity of nervous system preservation in Cambrian Burgess Shale-type deposits|journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences|volume=286|issue=1917|pages=20192370|doi=10.1098/rspb.2019.2370|pmid=31822253|pmc=6939931}}</ref> which could be non-homologous to the radiodont protocerebral frontal appendages;<ref name="cong2014" /><ref name=":8" /> putative euarthropod characters found on the single ''Schinderhannes'' fossil is questionable and may present other radiodont-like structures.<ref name=":11" />


=== Interrelationships ===
=== Interrelationships ===
Line 238: Line 252:
</gallery>
</gallery>


The first in-depth phylogenetic analysis of Radiodonta was conducted by Vinther ''et al''. in 2014,<ref name="vinther2014" /> followed by a handful of subsequest studies with more or less modified results.<ref name="cong2014" /><ref name="vanroy2015" /><ref name=":6" /><ref name=":13" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":27" /><ref name=":28" /><ref name=":22" /> In most analysis, ''[[Caryosyntrips]]'' is the basal-most genus, but either resolved in a polytomy with other radiodonts and Euarthropoda (alongside ''[[Cucumericrus]]'' if included<ref name="vanroy2015" /><ref name=":13" />) or outside of Radiodonta, casting doubt on its radiodont affinity.<ref name=":43">{{Cite journal |last=McCall |first=Christian R. A. |date=2023-12-13 |title=A large pelagic lobopodian from the Cambrian Pioche Shale of Nevada |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-paleontology/article/abs/large-pelagic-lobopodian-from-the-cambrian-pioche-shale-of-nevada/11B0704C49A7730AA3E8F46EB2CA1C95 |journal=Journal of Paleontology |language=en |pages=1–16 |doi=10.1017/jpa.2023.63 |issn=0022-3360}}</ref> With the exclusion of questionable ''Caryosyntrips'' and ''Cucumericrus'', the [[monophyly]] of Radiodonta is widely supported,<ref name="vinther2014" /><ref name="cong2014" /><ref name="vanroy2015" /><ref name=":6" /><ref name=":13" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":27" /><ref name=":28" /> with a few results suggest possible [[paraphyly]] (either the Anomalocarididae+Amplectobeluidae clade or Hurdiidae [[Sister group|sister]] to Euarthropoda).<ref name=":26" /><ref name=":22" /> Putative [[synapomorphies]] of monophyletic Radiodonta including tripartite head sclerite complex and differentiated neck region.<ref name=":1" /> The genus ''[[Anomalocaris]]'' in a broader sense always found to be [[polyphyletic]], usually with ''[[Guanshancaris|"Anomalocaris" kunmingensis]]'' and ''"Anomalocaris" briggsi'' resolved as a member of [[Amplectobeluidae]] and [[Tamisiocarididae]] respectively.<ref name="vinther2014" /><ref name="cong2014" /><ref name="vanroy2015" /><ref name=":6" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":27" /><ref name=":28" /> Interrelationship of Amplectobeluidae is uncertain, as the amplectobeluid affinities of ''[[Lyrarapax]]'' and ''[[Ramskoeldia]]'' were occasionally questioned.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":28" /> Monophyly of the speciose family [[Hurdiidae]] was recovered by most analysis and well-supported by several synapomorphies (e.g. distal articulated region of frontal appendage with proximal 5 podomeres bearing subequal endites<ref name=":3" /><ref name=":1" />). Tamisiocarididae was often suggested to be sister group of Hurdiidae in 2010s,<ref name="vinther2014" /><ref name="vanroy2015" /><ref name=":6">{{Cite journal|last1=Lerosey-Aubril|first1=Rudy|last2=Pates|first2=Stephen|date=2018-09-14|title=New suspension-feeding radiodont suggests evolution of microplanktivory in Cambrian macronekton|journal=Nature Communications|language=en|volume=9|issue=1|pages=3774|doi=10.1038/s41467-018-06229-7|issn=2041-1723|pmid=30218075|pmc=6138677|bibcode=2018NatCo...9.3774L}} [https://datadryad.org/stash/dataset/doi:10.5061/dryad.1cf2fb0 Dryad Data]</ref><ref name=":1" /> but this position became questionable in subsequent studies.<ref name=":41" /><ref name=":42" />
The first in-depth phylogenetic analysis of Radiodonta was conducted by Vinther ''et al''. in 2014,<ref name="vinther2014" /> followed by a handful of subsequest studies with more or less modified results.<ref name="cong2014" /><ref name="vanroy2015" /><ref name=":6" /><ref name=":13" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":27" /><ref name=":28" /><ref name=":22" /> In most analysis, ''[[Caryosyntrips]]'' is the basal-most genus, but either resolved in a polytomy with other radiodonts and Euarthropoda (alongside ''[[Cucumericrus]]'' if included<ref name="vanroy2015" /><ref name=":13" />) or outside of Radiodonta, casting doubt on its radiodont affinity.<ref name=":43">{{Cite journal |last=McCall |first=Christian R. A. |date=13 December 2023 |title=A large pelagic lobopodian from the Cambrian Pioche Shale of Nevada |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-paleontology/article/abs/large-pelagic-lobopodian-from-the-cambrian-pioche-shale-of-nevada/11B0704C49A7730AA3E8F46EB2CA1C95 |journal=Journal of Paleontology |language=en |pages=1–16 |doi=10.1017/jpa.2023.63 |issn=0022-3360}}</ref> With the exclusion of questionable ''Caryosyntrips'' and ''Cucumericrus'', the [[monophyly]] of Radiodonta is widely supported,<ref name="vinther2014" /><ref name="cong2014" /><ref name="vanroy2015" /><ref name=":6" /><ref name=":13" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":27" /><ref name=":28" /> with a few results suggest possible [[paraphyly]] (either the Anomalocarididae+Amplectobeluidae clade or Hurdiidae [[Sister group|sister]] to Euarthropoda).<ref name=":26" /><ref name=":22" /> Putative [[synapomorphies]] of monophyletic Radiodonta including tripartite head sclerite complex and differentiated neck region.<ref name=":1" /> The genus ''[[Anomalocaris]]'' in a broader sense always found to be [[polyphyletic]], usually with ''[[Guanshancaris|"Anomalocaris" kunmingensis]]'' and ''"Anomalocaris" briggsi'' resolved as a member of [[Amplectobeluidae]] and [[Tamisiocarididae]] respectively.<ref name="vinther2014" /><ref name="cong2014" /><ref name="vanroy2015" /><ref name=":6" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":27" /><ref name=":28" /> Interrelationship of Amplectobeluidae is uncertain, as the amplectobeluid affinities of ''[[Lyrarapax]]'' and ''[[Ramskoeldia]]'' were occasionally questioned.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":28" /> Monophyly of the speciose family [[Hurdiidae]] was recovered by most analysis and well-supported by several synapomorphies (e.g. distal articulated region of frontal appendage with proximal 5 podomeres bearing subequal endites<ref name=":3" /><ref name=":1" />). Tamisiocarididae was often suggested to be sister group of Hurdiidae in the 2010s,<ref name="vinther2014" /><ref name="vanroy2015" /><ref name=":6">{{Cite journal|last1=Lerosey-Aubril|first1=Rudy|last2=Pates|first2=Stephen|date=14 September 2018|title=New suspension-feeding radiodont suggests evolution of microplanktivory in Cambrian macronekton|journal=Nature Communications|language=en|volume=9|issue=1|pages=3774|doi=10.1038/s41467-018-06229-7|issn=2041-1723|pmid=30218075|pmc=6138677|bibcode=2018NatCo...9.3774L}} [https://datadryad.org/stash/dataset/doi:10.5061/dryad.1cf2fb0 Dryad Data]</ref><ref name=":1" /> but this position became questionable in subsequent studies.<ref name=":41" /><ref name=":42" />


* '''Radiodonta'''
* '''Radiodonta'''
** ?''[[Cucumericrus]]''<ref name=":4" /> (radiodont affinity questionable<ref name=":23">{{Cite journal |last1=Zeng |first1=Han |last2=Zhao |first2=Fangchen |last3=Yin |first3=Zongjun |last4=Zhu |first4=Maoyan |date=2018-01-02 |title=Morphology of diverse radiodontan head sclerites from the early Cambrian Chengjiang Lagerstätte, south-west China |url=https://doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2016.1263685 |journal=Journal of Systematic Palaeontology |volume=16 |issue=1 |pages=1–37 |doi=10.1080/14772019.2016.1263685 |issn=1477-2019 |s2cid=133549817}}</ref><ref name=":43" />)
** ?''[[Cucumericrus]]''<ref name=":4" /> (radiodont affinity questionable<ref name=":23">{{Cite journal |last1=Zeng |first1=Han |last2=Zhao |first2=Fangchen |last3=Yin |first3=Zongjun |last4=Zhu |first4=Maoyan |date=2 January 2018 |title=Morphology of diverse radiodontan head sclerites from the early Cambrian Chengjiang Lagerstätte, south-west China |url=https://doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2016.1263685 |journal=Journal of Systematic Palaeontology |volume=16 |issue=1 |pages=1–37 |doi=10.1080/14772019.2016.1263685 |issn=1477-2019 |s2cid=133549817}}</ref><ref name=":43" />)
** ?''[[Caryosyntrips]]''<ref name=":16" /> (radiodont affinity questionable<ref name=":43" />)
** ?''[[Caryosyntrips]]''<ref name=":16" /> (radiodont affinity questionable<ref name=":43" />)
** '''[[Anomalocarida]]'''
** '''[[Anomalocarida]]'''
*** ''[[Paranomalocaris]]''<ref name=":36">{{Cite journal|last1=Yuanyuan|first1=Wang|last2=Huang|first2=Diying|last3=Hu|first3=Shixue|date=2013-11-01|title=New anomalocardid frontal appendages from the Guanshan biota, eastern Yunnan|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257689210|journal=Chinese Science Bulletin|volume=58|issue=32|pages=3937–3942|doi=10.1007/s11434-013-5908-x|bibcode=2013ChSBu..58.3937W|s2cid=83910779|doi-access=free}}</ref> (placed within Anomalocarididae by some studies.<ref name=":13" /><ref name=":29" />)
*** ''[[Paranomalocaris]]''<ref name=":36">{{Cite journal|last1=Yuanyuan|first1=Wang|last2=Huang|first2=Diying|last3=Hu|first3=Shixue|date=1 November 2013|title=New anomalocardid frontal appendages from the Guanshan biota, eastern Yunnan|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257689210|journal=Chinese Science Bulletin|volume=58|issue=32|pages=3937–3942|doi=10.1007/s11434-013-5908-x|bibcode=2013ChSBu..58.3937W|s2cid=83910779|doi-access=free}}</ref> (placed within Anomalocarididae by some studies.<ref name=":13" /><ref name=":29" />)
*** ''[[Laminacaris]]''<ref name=":37">{{Cite journal|last1=Guo|first1=J.|last2=Pates|first2=S.|last3=Cong|first3=P.|last4=Daley|first4=A. C.|last5=Edgecombe|first5=G. D.|last6=Chen|first6=T.|last7=Hou|first7=X.|date=2018|title=A new radiodont (stem Euarthropoda) frontal appendage with a mosaic of characters from the Cambrian (Series 2 Stage 3) Chengjiang biota|url=https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:a2d090f6-c0cb-4603-8d89-a4894fe55f02|journal=Papers in Palaeontology|language=en|volume=5|issue=1|issn=2056-2799}}</ref> (placed within Amplectobeluidae by some studies.<ref name=":6" />)
*** ''[[Laminacaris]]''<ref name=":37">{{Cite journal|last1=Guo|first1=J.|last2=Pates|first2=S.|last3=Cong|first3=P.|last4=Daley|first4=A. C.|last5=Edgecombe|first5=G. D.|last6=Chen|first6=T.|last7=Hou|first7=X.|date=2018|title=A new radiodont (stem Euarthropoda) frontal appendage with a mosaic of characters from the Cambrian (Series 2 Stage 3) Chengjiang biota|url=https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:a2d090f6-c0cb-4603-8d89-a4894fe55f02|journal=Papers in Palaeontology|language=en|volume=5|issue=1|issn=2056-2799}}</ref> (placed within Amplectobeluidae by some studies.<ref name=":6" />)
*** ''[[Houcaris]]'' (either placed within Anomalocarididae,<ref name="vanroy2015" /><ref name=":13" /><ref name=":22" /> Amplectobeluidae<ref name="vinther2014" /><ref name=":6" /> or Tamisiocarididae.<ref name=":17" /><ref name=":27" />)
*** ''[[Houcaris]]'' (either placed within Anomalocarididae,<ref name="vanroy2015" /><ref name=":13" /><ref name=":22" /> Amplectobeluidae<ref name="vinther2014" /><ref name=":6" /><ref name=":43" /> or Tamisiocarididae.<ref name=":17" /><ref name=":27" />)
*** ''[[Innovatiocaris]]''<ref name="Innovatiocaris">{{Cite journal |last1=Zeng |first1=Han |last2=Zhao |first2=Fangchen |last3=Zhu |first3=Maoyan |date=2022-09-07 |title=''Innovatiocaris'', a complete radiodont from the early Cambrian Chengjiang Lagerstätte and its implications for the phylogeny of Radiodonta |url=https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2021-164 |journal=Journal of the Geological Society |volume=180 |doi=10.1144/jgs2021-164 |s2cid=252147346 |issn=0016-7649}}</ref>
*** ''[[Innovatiocaris]]''<ref name="Innovatiocaris">{{Cite journal |last1=Zeng |first1=Han |last2=Zhao |first2=Fangchen |last3=Zhu |first3=Maoyan |date=7 September 2022 |title=''Innovatiocaris'', a complete radiodont from the early Cambrian Chengjiang Lagerstätte and its implications for the phylogeny of Radiodonta |url=https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2021-164 |journal=Journal of the Geological Society |volume=180 |doi=10.1144/jgs2021-164 |s2cid=252147346 |issn=0016-7649}}</ref>
*** '''[[Anomalocarididae]]'''
*** '''[[Anomalocarididae]]'''
**** ''[[Anomalocaris]]'' (in a broader sense, some species may placed within the other families.<ref name="vinther2014" /><ref name="vanroy2015" />)
**** ''[[Anomalocaris]]'' (in a broader sense, some species may placed within the other families.<ref name="vinther2014" /><ref name="vanroy2015" />)
Line 256: Line 270:
**** ''[[Amplectobelua]]''<ref name=":4" />
**** ''[[Amplectobelua]]''<ref name=":4" />
**** ''[[Ramskoeldia]]''<ref name=":0" /> (position questioned by some studies.<ref name=":1" />)
**** ''[[Ramskoeldia]]''<ref name=":0" /> (position questioned by some studies.<ref name=":1" />)
**** ''[[Guanshancaris]]''<ref name=":29">{{Cite journal|last1=Jiao|first1=De-guang|last2=Pates|first2=Stephen|last3=Lerosey-Aubril|first3=Rudy|last4=Ortega-Hernandez|first4=Javier|last5=Yang|first5=Jie|last6=Lan|first6=Tian|last7=Zhang|first7=Xi-guang|date=2021|title=The endemic radiodonts of the Cambrian Stage 4 Guanshan biota of South China|journal=Acta Palaeontologica Polonica|language=en|volume=66|doi=10.4202/app.00870.2020|s2cid=236683029|issn=0567-7920|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":Guanshancaris">{{Cite journal |last1=Zhang |first1=Mingjing |last2=Wu |first2=Yu |last3=Lin |first3=Weiliang |last4=Ma |first4=Jiaxin |last5=Wu |first5=Yuheng |last6=Fu |first6=Dongjing |date=2023-04-11 |title=Amplectobeluid Radiodont Guanshancaris gen. nov. from the Lower Cambrian (Stage 4) Guanshan Lagerstätte of South China: Biostratigraphic and Paleobiogeographic Implications |journal=Biology |language=en |volume=12 |issue=4 |pages=583 |doi=10.3390/biology12040583 |pmid=37106783 |issn=2079-7737 |pmc=10136193 |doi-access=free }}</ref>
**** ''[[Guanshancaris]]''<ref name=":29">{{Cite journal|last1=Jiao|first1=De-guang|last2=Pates|first2=Stephen|last3=Lerosey-Aubril|first3=Rudy|last4=Ortega-Hernandez|first4=Javier|last5=Yang|first5=Jie|last6=Lan|first6=Tian|last7=Zhang|first7=Xi-guang|date=2021|title=The endemic radiodonts of the Cambrian Stage 4 Guanshan biota of South China|journal=Acta Palaeontologica Polonica|language=en|volume=66|doi=10.4202/app.00870.2020|s2cid=236683029|issn=0567-7920|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":Guanshancaris">{{Cite journal |last1=Zhang |first1=Mingjing |last2=Wu |first2=Yu |last3=Lin |first3=Weiliang |last4=Ma |first4=Jiaxin |last5=Wu |first5=Yuheng |last6=Fu |first6=Dongjing |date=11 April 2023 |title=Amplectobeluid Radiodont Guanshancaris gen. nov. from the Lower Cambrian (Stage 4) Guanshan Lagerstätte of South China: Biostratigraphic and Paleobiogeographic Implications |journal=Biology |language=en |volume=12 |issue=4 |pages=583 |doi=10.3390/biology12040583 |pmid=37106783 |issn=2079-7737 |pmc=10136193 |doi-access=free }}</ref>
**** [[Shucaris]] (either placed within Anomalocarididae or Amplectobeluidae<ref name=":44" /><ref name=":43" />)
**** [[Shucaris]] (either placed within Anomalocarididae or Amplectobeluidae<ref name=":44" /><ref name=":43" />)
*** '''[[Tamisiocarididae]]'''
*** '''[[Tamisiocarididae]]'''
Line 269: Line 283:
**** ''[[Schinderhannes (genus)|Schinderhannes]]'' (position questioned by some studies.<ref name=":112">{{Cite journal |last=Ortega-Hernández |first=Javier |date=Dec 2014 |title=Making sense of 'lower' and 'upper' stem-group Euarthropoda, with comments on the strict use of the name Arthropoda von Siebold, 1848 |journal=Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society |volume=91 |issue=1 |pages=255–273 |doi=10.1111/brv.12168 |issn=1469-185X |pmid=25528950 |s2cid=7751936}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author1=Zhu, X. |author2=Lerosey-Aubril, R. |author3=Ortega-Hernández, J. |year=2021 |title=Furongian (Jiangshanian) occurrences of radiodonts in Poland and South China and the fossil record of the Hurdiidae |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352983445 |journal=[[PeerJ]] |volume=9 |at=e11800 |doi=10.7717/peerj.11800 |pmc=8312493 |pmid=34386302 |doi-access=free |lang=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Potin |first1=Gaëtan J.-M. |last2=Daley |first2=Allison C. |date=2023 |title=The significance of ''Anomalocaris'' and other Radiodonta for understanding paleoecology and evolution during the Cambrian explosion |journal=Frontiers in Earth Science |volume=11 |bibcode=2023FrEaS..1160285P |doi=10.3389/feart.2023.1160285 |issn=2296-6463 |doi-access=free}}</ref>)
**** ''[[Schinderhannes (genus)|Schinderhannes]]'' (position questioned by some studies.<ref name=":112">{{Cite journal |last=Ortega-Hernández |first=Javier |date=Dec 2014 |title=Making sense of 'lower' and 'upper' stem-group Euarthropoda, with comments on the strict use of the name Arthropoda von Siebold, 1848 |journal=Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society |volume=91 |issue=1 |pages=255–273 |doi=10.1111/brv.12168 |issn=1469-185X |pmid=25528950 |s2cid=7751936}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author1=Zhu, X. |author2=Lerosey-Aubril, R. |author3=Ortega-Hernández, J. |year=2021 |title=Furongian (Jiangshanian) occurrences of radiodonts in Poland and South China and the fossil record of the Hurdiidae |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352983445 |journal=[[PeerJ]] |volume=9 |at=e11800 |doi=10.7717/peerj.11800 |pmc=8312493 |pmid=34386302 |doi-access=free |lang=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Potin |first1=Gaëtan J.-M. |last2=Daley |first2=Allison C. |date=2023 |title=The significance of ''Anomalocaris'' and other Radiodonta for understanding paleoecology and evolution during the Cambrian explosion |journal=Frontiers in Earth Science |volume=11 |bibcode=2023FrEaS..1160285P |doi=10.3389/feart.2023.1160285 |issn=2296-6463 |doi-access=free}}</ref>)
**** ''[[Hurdia]]''
**** ''[[Hurdia]]''
**** ''[[Stanleycaris]]''<ref name=":38">{{Cite book|last1=Pates|first1=Stephen|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326142899|title=Reply to Comment on "Aysheaia prolata from the Utah Wheeler Formation (Drumian, Cambrian) is a frontal appendage of the radiodontan Stanleycaris" with the formal description of Stanleycaris|last2=Daley|first2=Allison|last3=Ortega-Hernández|first3=Javier|date=2018-03-03}}</ref>
**** ''[[Stanleycaris]]''<ref name=":38">{{Cite book|last1=Pates|first1=Stephen|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326142899|title=Reply to Comment on "Aysheaia prolata from the Utah Wheeler Formation (Drumian, Cambrian) is a frontal appendage of the radiodontan Stanleycaris" with the formal description of Stanleycaris|last2=Daley|first2=Allison|last3=Ortega-Hernández|first3=Javier|date=3 March 2018}}</ref>
**** ''[[Pahvantia]]''<ref name=":6" />
**** ''[[Pahvantia]]''<ref name=":6" />
**** ''[[Ursulinacaris]]''<ref name=":3" />
**** ''[[Ursulinacaris]]''<ref name=":3" />
**** ''[[Cambroraster]]''<ref name=":1" />
**** ''[[Cambroraster]]''<ref name=":1" />
**** ?''[[Zhenghecaris]]'' (putative hurdiid radiodont<ref name=":23" />)
**** ?''[[Zhenghecaris]]'' (putative hurdiid radiodont<ref name=":23" />)
**** ''[[Cordaticaris]]''<ref name=":24">{{Cite journal|last1=Sun|first1=Zhixin|last2=Zeng|first2=Han|last3=Zhao|first3=Fangchen|date=2020-08-01|title=A new middle Cambrian radiodont from North China: Implications for morphological disparity and spatial distribution of hurdiids|url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031018220303928|journal=Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology|volume=558|language=en|pages=109947|doi=10.1016/j.palaeo.2020.109947|bibcode=2020PPP...558j9947S|s2cid=224868404|issn=0031-0182}}</ref>
**** ''[[Cordaticaris]]''<ref name=":24">{{Cite journal|last1=Sun|first1=Zhixin|last2=Zeng|first2=Han|last3=Zhao|first3=Fangchen|date=1 August 2020|title=A new middle Cambrian radiodont from North China: Implications for morphological disparity and spatial distribution of hurdiids|url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031018220303928|journal=Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology|volume=558|language=en|pages=109947|doi=10.1016/j.palaeo.2020.109947|bibcode=2020PPP...558j9947S|s2cid=224868404|issn=0031-0182}}</ref>
**** ''[[Buccaspinea]]''<ref name=":25">{{Cite journal|last1=Pates|first1=Stephen|last2=Lerosey-Aubril|first2=Rudy|last3=Daley|first3=Allison C.|last4=Kier|first4=Carlo|last5=Bonino|first5=Enrico|last6=Ortega-Hernández|first6=Javier|date=2021-01-19|title=The diverse radiodont fauna from the Marjum Formation of Utah, USA (Cambrian: Drumian)|journal=PeerJ|language=en|volume=9|pages=e10509|doi=10.7717/peerj.10509|pmid=33552709| pmc=7821760 |issn=2167-8359|doi-access=free}}</ref>
**** ''[[Buccaspinea]]''<ref name=":25">{{Cite journal|last1=Pates|first1=Stephen|last2=Lerosey-Aubril|first2=Rudy|last3=Daley|first3=Allison C.|last4=Kier|first4=Carlo|last5=Bonino|first5=Enrico|last6=Ortega-Hernández|first6=Javier|date=19 January 2021|title=The diverse radiodont fauna from the Marjum Formation of Utah, USA (Cambrian: Drumian)|journal=PeerJ|language=en|volume=9|pages=e10509|doi=10.7717/peerj.10509|pmid=33552709| pmc=7821760 |issn=2167-8359|doi-access=free}}</ref>
**** ''[[Titanokorys]]''<ref name="CaronMoysiuk2021"/>
**** ''[[Titanokorys]]''<ref name="CaronMoysiuk2021"/>


Line 416: Line 430:
|Unknown
|Unknown
|-
|-
| ''[[Houcaris]] saron'' (formerly ''Anomalocaris saron'')<ref name=":17">{{Cite journal|last1=Wu|first1=Yu|last2=Fu|first2=Dongjing|last3=Ma|first3=Jiaxin|last4=Lin|first4=Weiliang|last5=Sun|first5=Ao|last6=Zhang|first6=Xingliang|date=2021-06-01|title=''Houcaris'' gen. nov. from the early Cambrian (Stage 3) Chengjiang Lagerstätte expanded the palaeogeographical distribution of tamisiocaridids (Panarthropoda: Radiodonta)|url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s12542-020-00545-4|journal=PalZ|language=en|volume=95|issue=2|pages=209–221|doi=10.1007/s12542-020-00545-4|s2cid=235221043|issn=1867-6812}}</ref>
| ''[[Houcaris]] saron'' (formerly ''Anomalocaris saron'')<ref name=":17">{{Cite journal|last1=Wu|first1=Yu|last2=Fu|first2=Dongjing|last3=Ma|first3=Jiaxin|last4=Lin|first4=Weiliang|last5=Sun|first5=Ao|last6=Zhang|first6=Xingliang|date=1 June 2021|title=''Houcaris'' gen. nov. from the early Cambrian (Stage 3) Chengjiang Lagerstätte expanded the palaeogeographical distribution of tamisiocaridids (Panarthropoda: Radiodonta)|url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s12542-020-00545-4|journal=PalZ|language=en|volume=95|issue=2|pages=209–221|doi=10.1007/s12542-020-00545-4|s2cid=235221043|issn=1867-6812}}</ref>
|| Hou, Bergström, & Ahlberg
|| Hou, Bergström, & Ahlberg
|| 1995
|| 1995
Line 425: Line 439:
|Unknown
|Unknown
|-
|-
| ''[[Echidnacaris]] briggsi''<ref name=":42">{{Cite journal |last1=Paterson |first1=John R. |last2=García-Bellido |first2=Diego C. |last3=Edgecombe |first3=Gregory D. |date=2023-01-01 |title=The early Cambrian Emu Bay Shale radiodonts revisited: morphology and systematics |journal=Journal of Systematic Palaeontology |language=en |volume=21 |issue=1 |doi=10.1080/14772019.2023.2225066 |s2cid=259719252 |issn=1477-2019|doi-access=free }}</ref>
| ''[[Echidnacaris]] briggsi''<ref name=":42">{{Cite journal |last1=Paterson |first1=John R. |last2=García-Bellido |first2=Diego C. |last3=Edgecombe |first3=Gregory D. |date=1 January 2023 |title=The early Cambrian Emu Bay Shale radiodonts revisited: morphology and systematics |journal=Journal of Systematic Palaeontology |language=en |volume=21 |issue=1 |doi=10.1080/14772019.2023.2225066 |s2cid=259719252 |issn=1477-2019|doi-access=free }}</ref>
|| Nedin
|| Nedin
|| 1995
|| 1995
Line 531: Line 545:
|| {{flag|Canada}}
|| {{flag|Canada}}
|| [[File:20210518_Radiodonta_frontal_appendage_Stanleycaris_hirpex.png|200px]]
|| [[File:20210518_Radiodonta_frontal_appendage_Stanleycaris_hirpex.png|200px]]
|P-element is unknown, possibly absent<ref name=":41">{{Cite journal |last1=Moysiuk |first1=Joseph |last2=Caron |first2=Jean-Bernard |date=2022-08-08 |title=A three-eyed radiodont with fossilized neuroanatomy informs the origin of the arthropod head and segmentation |journal=Current Biology |language=en |volume=32 |issue=15 |pages=3302–3316.e2 |doi=10.1016/j.cub.2022.06.027 |pmid=35809569 |s2cid=250361698 |issn=0960-9822|doi-access=free }}</ref>
|P-element is unknown, possibly absent<ref name=":41">{{Cite journal |last1=Moysiuk |first1=Joseph |last2=Caron |first2=Jean-Bernard |date=8 August 2022 |title=A three-eyed radiodont with fossilized neuroanatomy informs the origin of the arthropod head and segmentation |journal=Current Biology |language=en |volume=32 |issue=15 |pages=3302–3316.e2 |doi=10.1016/j.cub.2022.06.027 |pmid=35809569 |s2cid=250361698 |issn=0960-9822|doi-access=free }}</ref>
|-
|-
| ''[[Peytoia nathorsti]]''
| ''[[Peytoia nathorsti]]''
Line 542: Line 556:
|Incomplete<ref name=":1" />
|Incomplete<ref name=":1" />
|-
|-
| ''[[Peytoia infercambriensis]]'' (formerly ''Cassubia infercambriensis'')<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Daley|first1=Allison|last2=Legg|first2=David|date=2015-07-02|title=A morphological and taxonomic appraisal of the oldest anomalocaridid from the Lower Cambrian of Poland|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279805320|journal=Geological Magazine|volume=-1|issue=5|pages=949–955|doi=10.1017/S0016756815000412|bibcode=2015GeoM..152..949D|s2cid=130745134}}</ref>
| ''[[Peytoia infercambriensis]]'' (formerly ''Cassubia infercambriensis'')<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Daley|first1=Allison|last2=Legg|first2=David|date=2 July 2015|title=A morphological and taxonomic appraisal of the oldest anomalocaridid from the Lower Cambrian of Poland|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279805320|journal=Geological Magazine|volume=-1|issue=5|pages=949–955|doi=10.1017/S0016756815000412|bibcode=2015GeoM..152..949D|s2cid=130745134}}</ref>
|| Lendzion
|| Lendzion
|| 1975
|| 1975
Line 611: Line 625:
| data-sort-value="514" |[[Cambrian Stage 3]]
| data-sort-value="514" |[[Cambrian Stage 3]]
|| {{flag|China}}
|| {{flag|China}}
|| Unknown
|| Unknown <ref name=":23" />
|[[File:20210708 Zhenghecaris shankouensis sclerite.png|left|200x200px]]
|[[File:20210708 Zhenghecaris shankouensis sclerite.png|left|200x200px]]
|-
|-
Line 650: Line 664:
|Incomplete<ref name=":40"/>
|Incomplete<ref name=":40"/>
|-
|-
|[[Shucaris]] ankylosskelos
|''[[Shucaris]] ankylosskelos''
|Wu ''et al.''
|Wu ''et al.''
|2024
|2024
Line 656: Line 670:
|[[Cambrian Stage 2]]–[[Cambrian Stage 3]]
|[[Cambrian Stage 2]]–[[Cambrian Stage 3]]
|{{flag|China}}
|{{flag|China}}
|[[File:全-正.png|center|frameless]]
|[[File:20240904 Radiodonta frontal appendage Shucaris ankylosskelos.png|center|frameless]]
|Incomplete<ref name=":44">{{Cite journal |last=Wu |first=Yu |last2=Pates |first2=Stephen |last3=Liu |first3=Cong |last4=Zhang |first4=Mingjing |last5=Lin |first5=Weiliang |last6=Ma |first6=Jiaxin |last7=Wu |first7=Yuheng |last8=Chai |first8=Shu |last9=Zhang |first9=Xingliang |last10=Fu |first10=Dongjing |date=2024-12-31 |title=A new radiodont from the lower Cambrian (Series 2 Stage 3) Chengjiang Lagerstätte, South China informs the evolution of feeding structures in radiodonts |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14772019.2024.2364887 |journal=Journal of Systematic Palaeontology |language=en |volume=22 |issue=1 |doi=10.1080/14772019.2024.2364887 |issn=1477-2019|doi-access=free }}</ref>
|Incomplete<ref name=":44">{{Cite journal |last=Wu |first=Yu |last2=Pates |first2=Stephen |last3=Liu |first3=Cong |last4=Zhang |first4=Mingjing |last5=Lin |first5=Weiliang |last6=Ma |first6=Jiaxin |last7=Wu |first7=Yuheng |last8=Chai |first8=Shu |last9=Zhang |first9=Xingliang |last10=Fu |first10=Dongjing |date=31 December 2024 |title=A new radiodont from the lower Cambrian (Series 2 Stage 3) Chengjiang Lagerstätte, South China informs the evolution of feeding structures in radiodonts |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14772019.2024.2364887 |journal=Journal of Systematic Palaeontology |language=en |volume=22 |issue=1 |doi=10.1080/14772019.2024.2364887 |issn=1477-2019|doi-access=free |hdl=10871/136118 |hdl-access=free }}</ref>
|-
|''[[Stanleycaris]] qingjiangensis''
|Wu ''et al.''
|2024
|[[Hurdiidae]]
|[[Cambrian Stage 3|Cambrian stage 3]]
|{{flag|China}}
|[[File:20240914 Radiodonta frontal appendage Stanleycaris qingjiangensis.png|frameless]]
|Incomplete<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Wu |first=Yu |last2=Pates |first2=Stephen |last3=Zhang |first3=Mingjing |last4=Lin |first4=Weiliang |last5=Ma |first5=Jiaxin |last6=Liu |first6=Cong |last7=Wu |first7=Yuheng |last8=Zhang |first8=Xingliang |last9=Fu |first9=Dongjing |date=July 2024 |title=Exceptionally preserved radiodont arthropods from the lower Cambrian (Stage 3) Qingjiang Lagerstätte of Hubei, South China and the biogeographic and diversification patterns of radiodonts |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/spp2.1583 |journal=Papers in Palaeontology |language=en |volume=10 |issue=4 |doi=10.1002/spp2.1583 |issn=2056-2799}}</ref>
|}
|}


Line 671: Line 694:
The history of radiodonts is complex. Incomplete specimens pertaining to different body parts of the same species had historically been interpreted as belonging to different species and even different phyla.<ref name=collins1996/><ref name=daley2009/> Prior to their recognition as a group, radiodont specimens had been assigned to five different phyla: [[Porifera]], [[Cnidaria]], [[Echinodermata]], [[Annelida]], and [[Arthropoda]].<ref name=collins1996/>
The history of radiodonts is complex. Incomplete specimens pertaining to different body parts of the same species had historically been interpreted as belonging to different species and even different phyla.<ref name=collins1996/><ref name=daley2009/> Prior to their recognition as a group, radiodont specimens had been assigned to five different phyla: [[Porifera]], [[Cnidaria]], [[Echinodermata]], [[Annelida]], and [[Arthropoda]].<ref name=collins1996/>


The first known radiodont specimens were collected from the [[Mount Stephen trilobite beds|trilobite beds]] of [[Mount Stephen]] by Richard G. McConnell of the [[Geological Survey of Canada]] in 1886<ref name=collins1996/> or 1888.<ref name=whiteaves1892/> These specimens were named ''[[Anomalocaris canadensis]]'' in 1892 by GSC paleontologist [[Joseph Frederick Whiteaves|Joseph Whiteaves]].<ref name=whiteaves1892/> Whiteaves interpreted the specimens, now known to be isolated frontal appendages, as the abdomen of a [[Phyllocarida|phyllocarid]] [[crustacean]].<ref name="whiteaves1892" /> Additional radiodont specimens were described in 1911 by [[Charles Doolittle Walcott|Charles Walcott]].<ref name=":34">Walcott, C. D. 1911a. [https://repository.si.edu/handle/10088/23427 Middle Cambrian holothurians and medusae]. Cambrian geoogy and paleontology II. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 57: 41-68.</ref> He interpreted an isolated oral cone, which he named ''[[Peytoia nathorsti]]'', as a jellyfish, and a poorly-preserved but relatively complete specimen, which he named ''Laggania cambria'', as a holothurian.<ref name=":34" /> In 1912 Walcott named ''[[Hurdia]] victoria'' and ''H. triangulata'' based on isolated H-elements, which he interpreted as the carapaces of crustaceans.<ref name=":39">WALCOTT, C. D. 1912. [https://repository.si.edu/bitstream/handle/10088/23430/SMC_57_Walcott_1910_6_145-245.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y Middle Cambrian Branchiopoda, Malacostraca, Trilobita and Merostomata]. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 57: 145–228.</ref> Isolated frontal appendages of ''Peytoia'' and ''Hurdia'', collectively known as "Appendage F" in Briggs 1979, were all identified as those of ''[[Sidneyia]]'' at that time.<ref name=":34" /> A ''Hurdia'' P-element was named ''Proboscicaris'' in 1962, and interpreted as the carapace of a bivalved arthropod.<ref>ROLFE, W. D. I. 1962. Two new arthropod carapaces from the Burgess Shale (Middle Cambrian) of Canada. Breviora Museum of Comparative Zoology, 60: 1–9.</ref>
The first known radiodont specimens were collected from the [[Mount Stephen trilobite beds|trilobite beds]] of [[Mount Stephen]] by Richard G. McConnell of the [[Geological Survey of Canada]] in 1886<ref name=collins1996/> or 1888.<ref name=whiteaves1892/> These specimens were named ''[[Anomalocaris canadensis]]'' in 1892 by GSC paleontologist [[Joseph Frederick Whiteaves|Joseph Whiteaves]].<ref name=whiteaves1892/> Whiteaves interpreted the specimens, now known to be isolated frontal appendages, as the abdomen of a [[Phyllocarida|phyllocarid]] [[crustacean]].<ref name="whiteaves1892" /> Additional radiodont specimens were described in 1911 by [[Charles Doolittle Walcott|Charles Walcott]].<ref name=":34">Walcott, C. D. 1911a. [https://repository.si.edu/handle/10088/23427 Middle Cambrian holothurians and medusae]. Cambrian geoogy and paleontology II. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 57: 41–68.</ref> He interpreted an isolated oral cone, which he named ''[[Peytoia nathorsti]]'', as a jellyfish, and a poorly-preserved but relatively complete specimen, which he named ''Laggania cambria'', as a holothurian.<ref name=":34" /> In 1912 Walcott named ''[[Hurdia]] victoria'' and ''H. triangulata'' based on isolated H-elements, which he interpreted as the carapaces of crustaceans.<ref name=":39">WALCOTT, C. D. 1912. [https://repository.si.edu/bitstream/handle/10088/23430/SMC_57_Walcott_1910_6_145-245.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y Middle Cambrian Branchiopoda, Malacostraca, Trilobita and Merostomata]. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 57: 145–228.</ref> Isolated frontal appendages of ''Peytoia'' and ''Hurdia'', collectively known as "Appendage F" in Briggs 1979, were all identified as those of ''[[Sidneyia]]'' at that time.<ref name=":34" /> A ''Hurdia'' P-element was named ''Proboscicaris'' in 1962, and interpreted as the carapace of a bivalved arthropod.<ref>ROLFE, W. D. I. 1962. Two new arthropod carapaces from the Burgess Shale (Middle Cambrian) of Canada. Breviora Museum of Comparative Zoology, 60: 1–9.</ref>


The Geological Survey of Canada initiated a revision of Burgess Shale fossils in 1966, overseen by [[Cambridge University]] paleontologist [[Harry B. Whittington]].<ref name=collins1996/> This revision would ultimately lead to the discovery of the complete radiodont body plan. In 1978, [[Simon Conway Morris]] recognized that the mouthparts of ''Laggania'' were ''Peytoia''-like, but he interpreted this as evidence that it was a composite fossil made up of a ''Peytoia'' jellyfish and a sponge.<ref name=conwaymorris1978/> In 1979, [[Derek Briggs]] recognized that the fossils of ''Anomalocaris'' were appendages, not abdomens, but interpreted them as walking legs alongside "Appendage F".<ref name=briggs1979/> It was not until 1985 that the true nature of the fossils of ''Anomalocaris'', ''Laggania'', and ''Peytoia'' was recognized, and they were all assigned to a single genus, ''Anomalocaris''.<ref name=":31" /> Subsequently, it was recognized that ''Anomalocaris'' was a distinct form from the other two, resulting in a split into two genera, the latter of which was variously named ''Laggania'' and ''Peytoia'' until it was determined that both represent the same species and ''Peytoia'' had priority.<ref name=":14" /> It was later recognized that some of the fossils assigned to these taxa belonged to another form, which was recognized as bearing a carapace made up of ''Hurdia'' and ''Proboscicaris'' elements. Finally, in 2009, these specimens were redescribed as ''Hurdia''.<ref name="daley2009" /> Even after these recognitions, partial misidentifications (e.g. oral cone and frontal appendages of ''Peytoia'' had been assigned to ''Anomalocaris''<ref name="collins1996" /> and ''Hurdia'',<ref name="daley2009" /> respectively) had been revealed by subsequent studies as well.<ref name=":14" /><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Daley|first1=Allison|last2=Budd|first2=Graham|last3=Caron|first3=Jean-Bernard|date=2013-10-01|title=The morphology and systematics of the anomalocarid Hurdia from the Middle Cambrian of British Columbia and Utah|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263406650|journal=Journal of Systematic Palaeontology|volume=11|doi=10.1080/14772019.2012.732723|s2cid=86465719}}</ref>
The Geological Survey of Canada initiated a revision of Burgess Shale fossils in 1966, overseen by [[Cambridge University]] paleontologist [[Harry B. Whittington]].<ref name=collins1996/> This revision would ultimately lead to the discovery of the complete radiodont body plan. In 1978, [[Simon Conway Morris]] recognized that the mouthparts of ''Laggania'' were ''Peytoia''-like, but he interpreted this as evidence that it was a composite fossil made up of a ''Peytoia'' jellyfish and a sponge.<ref name=conwaymorris1978/> In 1979, [[Derek Briggs]] recognized that the fossils of ''Anomalocaris'' were appendages, not abdomens, but interpreted them as walking legs alongside "Appendage F".<ref name=briggs1979/> It was not until 1985 that the true nature of the fossils of ''Anomalocaris'', ''Laggania'', and ''Peytoia'' was recognized, and they were all assigned to a single genus, ''Anomalocaris''.<ref name=":31" /> Subsequently, it was recognized that ''Anomalocaris'' was a distinct form from the other two, resulting in a split into two genera, the latter of which was variously named ''Laggania'' and ''Peytoia'' until it was determined that both represent the same species and ''Peytoia'' had priority.<ref name=":14" /> It was later recognized that some of the fossils assigned to these taxa belonged to another form, which was recognized as bearing a carapace made up of ''Hurdia'' and ''Proboscicaris'' elements. Finally, in 2009, these specimens were redescribed as ''Hurdia''.<ref name="daley2009" /> Even after these recognitions, partial misidentifications (e.g. oral cone and frontal appendages of ''Peytoia'' had been assigned to ''Anomalocaris''<ref name="collins1996" /> and ''Hurdia'',<ref name="daley2009" /> respectively) had been revealed by subsequent studies as well.<ref name=":14" /><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Daley|first1=Allison|last2=Budd|first2=Graham|last3=Caron|first3=Jean-Bernard|date=1 October 2013|title=The morphology and systematics of the anomalocarid Hurdia from the Middle Cambrian of British Columbia and Utah|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263406650|journal=Journal of Systematic Palaeontology|volume=11|doi=10.1080/14772019.2012.732723|s2cid=86465719}}</ref>


The taxon Radiodonta itself was coined in 1996 by Desmond Collins, after it was established that ''Anomalocaris'' and its kin represented a distinctive lineage with arthropod affinities rather than a hitherto unknown phylum.<ref name=collins1996/> Collins also established the class [[Dinocarida]] to contain the order Radiodonta as well as the [[Opabiniidae]], which he recognized as distinct due to its lacking the distinctive oral cone structure of radiodonts.<ref name="collins1996" /> Radiodonta was first given a phylogenetic definition in 2014.<ref name="vinther2014"/> Radiodonta was originally viewed as containing a single family, [[Anomalocarididae]], but it was divided into four families in 2014: [[Amplectobeluidae]], Anomalocarididae, [[Cetiocaridae]], and [[Hurdiidae]].<ref name="vinther2014" /> The name Cetiocaridae did not conform to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature and so was renamed [[Tamisiocarididae]] in 2019.<ref name=Pates2019/>
The taxon Radiodonta itself was coined in 1996 by Desmond Collins, after it was established that ''Anomalocaris'' and its kin represented a distinctive lineage with arthropod affinities rather than a hitherto unknown phylum.<ref name=collins1996/> Collins also established the class [[Dinocarida]] to contain the order Radiodonta as well as the [[Opabiniidae]], which he recognized as distinct due to its lacking the distinctive oral cone structure of radiodonts.<ref name="collins1996" /> Radiodonta was first given a phylogenetic definition in 2014.<ref name="vinther2014"/> Radiodonta was originally viewed as containing a single family, [[Anomalocarididae]], but it was divided into four families in 2014: [[Amplectobeluidae]], Anomalocarididae, [[Cetiocaridae]], and [[Hurdiidae]].<ref name="vinther2014" /> The name Cetiocaridae did not conform to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature and so was renamed [[Tamisiocarididae]] in 2019.<ref name=Pates2019/>


Until the [[2010s]], radiodonts were typically considered to be uniformly large apex predators, but discoveries of new species over the course of that decade led to a considerable increase in the known ecological and morphological diversity of the group.<ref name="vinther2014" /><ref name="vanroy2015" /><ref name=":6" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=Paterson2020/><ref name=":25" /><ref name=":27" /><ref name=":28" />
Until the 2010s, radiodonts were typically considered to be uniformly large apex predators, but discoveries of new species over the course of that decade led to a considerable increase in the known ecological and morphological diversity of the group.<ref name="vinther2014" /><ref name="vanroy2015" /><ref name=":6" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=Paterson2020/><ref name=":25" /><ref name=":27" /><ref name=":28" />


==References==
==References==

Latest revision as of 15:04, 20 November 2024

Radiodonta
Temporal range: Cambrian Series 2–Early Devonian
Left to right, top to bottom: Amplectobelua symbrachiata, Anomalocaris canadensis, Aegirocassis benmoulai, Peytoia nathorsti, Lyrarapax unguispinus, Cambroraster falcatus, and Hurdia victoria
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
Phylum:
Class:
Order:
Radiodonta
Collins, 1996
Families
Synonyms

Anomalocarida

Radiodonta (also known as radiodonts,[1][2][3] radiodontans,[4][5] radiodontids,[6] anomalocarids,[7] or anomalocaridids,[8][9][10] although the last two originally refer to the family Anomalocarididae, which previously included all species of this order but is now restricted to only a few species.[7]) is an extinct order of stem-group arthropods that was successful worldwide during the Cambrian period. Radiodonts are distinguished by their distinctive frontal appendages, which are morphologically diverse and were used for a variety of functions. Radiodonts were among the earliest large predators, but they also included sediment sifters and filter feeders.[11] Some of the most famous species of radiodonts are the Cambrian taxa Anomalocaris canadensis, Hurdia victoria, Peytoia nathorsti, Titanokorys gainesi, Cambroraster falcatus and Amplectobelua symbrachiata. The later surviving members include the subfamily Aegirocassisinae from the Early Ordovician of Morocco and the Early Devonian member Schinderhannes bartelsi from Germany.

Etymology

[edit]

The name Radiodonta (Latin for radius "spoke of a wheel" and Greek for odoús "tooth") refers to the radial arrangement of tooth plates (oral cone) surrounding the mouth,[6] although these features are suggested to be absent in some radiodont species.[4][1]

Definition

[edit]

The original diagnosis of order Radiodonta in 1996 is as follows:[6]

Radiodontids are bilaterally symmetrical, elongate arthropods with a nonmineralized cuticle typically most robust in the jaws and claws. The body is subdivided into two tagmata, much like the prosoma and opisthosoma of chelicerate arthropods. Typically, the front part shows no external segmentation, bears one pair of preoral claws, a pair of prominent eyes, and ventral jaws with radiating teeth. Some forms have additional rows of teeth and three or four postoral gnathobasic limb pairs. The trunk is metameric, typically with about 13 segments laterally developing imbricating lobes for swimming and gills for respiration, and may end in a prominent three-part tail. Some forms have gnathobasic trunk limbs.

In 2014, the clade Radiodonta was defined phylogenetically as a clade including any taxa closer to Anomalocaris canadensis than Paralithodes camtschaticus.[7] In 2019, it was redefined morphologically as animal bearing head carapace complex with central (H-) and lateral (P-) elements; outgrowths (endites) from frontal appendages bearing auxiliary spines; and reduced anterior flaps or bands of lamellae (setal blades) and strong tapering of body from anterior to posterior.[3]

Description

[edit]
Size estimation and comparison of radiodont species known by nearly complete specimens

Most radiodonts were significantly larger than the other Cambrian fauna, with typical body lengths of large taxa varying from 30 to 50 cm (12 to 20 in).[12] The largest described radiodont is the Early Ordovician species Aegirocassis benmoulai, which may have grown up to 2 m (6.6 ft) long.[10][2] A nearly complete specimen of a juvenile Lyrarapax unguispinus measured only 18 mm (0.71 in), making it among the smallest radiodont specimens known, though adults reached a length of 8.3 cm (3.3 in)[2][13] An isolated frontal appendage of a hurdiid with a length less than half that of the juvenile Lyrarapax is known, but it is not known whether this specimen pertains to an adult.[14] The largest known Cambrian radiodont was Amplectobelua, reaching lengths of up to 90 cm (35 in) based on an incomplete specimen.[15] Anomalocaris canadensis was also relatively large, estimated up to 34.2–37.8 cm (13.5–14.9 in) long,[2] and the Cambrian hurdiid Titanokorys approached around 50 cm (20 in) long.[16]

The body of a radiodont could be divided into two regions: head and trunk. The head is composed of only one body segment[17] known as the ocular somite, covered by sclerites (head carapace complex), bore arthropodized frontal appendages, ventral mouthparts (oral cone), and stalked compound eyes. The tapering trunk is composed of multiple body segments, each associated with pairs of flaps and gill-like structures (setal blades).[3]

Frontal appendage

[edit]
Frontal appendages morphology of the radiodont families Anomalocarididae/Amplectobeluidae and Hurdiidae

The anterior structures on the head are a pair of frontal appendages which have been referred to as 'claws', 'grasping appendages', 'feeding appendages', or 'great appendages' in previous studies (the last term is discouraged since the homology between frontal appendages and the original, morphologically distinct megacheiran great appendages is questionable.[17][18]). They are sclerotized (hardened) and arthropodized (segmented), bearing ventral endites (spines) on most of their podomeres (segmental units), and the endites may bear additional rows of auxiliary spines on their anterior and posterior margins.[19][3] The frontal appendage consists of two regions: the shaft ('peduncle',[2] 'base'[20] or 'promixal region'[2] in some studies) and the distal articulated region[19] (also referred to as 'claw'[20]). A triangular region covered by soft cuticle (arthrodial membrane) may occur on the ventral side between podomeres and provide flexibility.[21][11] Their purported pre-ocular and protocerebral origin suggest they are homologous to the primary antennae of Onychophora and the labrum of Euarthropoda (all arose from ocular somite),[17][9] while subsequent studies also suggest a deutocerebral origin and homologous with the chelicerae of Chelicerata and the antennae or 'great appendages' of other arthropods (all arose from post-ocular somite 1).[22] Since the morphology of the frontal appendages, especially those of the spines, always differs between species, it is one of the most important means of species identification.[19] In fact, many radiodonts are only known from a handful of fossilized frontal appendages.[21][19]

Oral cone

[edit]
Oral cones of various radiodonts

The mouth is on the ventral side of the head, behind the attachment point of frontal appendages and is surrounded by a ring of tooth plates, forming the mouthpart known as oral cone ('jaws' in previous studies[6]). 3 or 4 tooth plates might be enlarged, giving the oral cone a triradial (e.g. Anomalocaris, Echidnacaris) or tetraradial (e.g. Hurdiidae, Lyrarapax) appearance.[23][13][24] The inner margin of tooth plates have spikes facing towards the mouth opening. Additional rows of internal tooth plates may occur in some hurdiid genera.[8][3] Detail reconstruction of some amplectobeluid oral cones are speculative, but they possibly did not present a typical radial arrangement.[4][1]

Head sclerites, eyes and trunk

[edit]
Head sclerite complexes of various radiodonts

Three head sclerite (carapace) complex formed by a central H-element (anterior sclerite or head shield) and a pair of P-elements (lateral sclerites) cover the dorsal and laterovental surface of the animal's head.[3] The P-elements may connect to each other as well as the H-element by a narrow anterior extension (P-element neck or 'beak').[8][3] The head sclerites are small and ovoid in Anomalocarididae and Amplectobeluidae,[4][3] but often enlarged in Hurdiidae, corresponded to their distinct body shapes (streamlined in Anomalocarididae/Amplectobeluidae but often compact in Hurdiidae).[3] The head bore two stalked compound eyes, which may have had mobility,[25] and are located between the gaps formed by the posterior regions of the H-element and P-elements.[8][3] The compound eyes of Echidnacaris are exceptionally unstalked.[14] Some species possess an additional median eye behind the H-element.[22]

Anterior region of two generized Anomalocaris and Hurdiid radiodont, showing distinct morphology A: Dorsal view, B: Ventral view, Fa: Frontal appendage, He: H-element, Pe: P-element, Ey: Eye, Oc: Oral cone, Af: Anterior (neck) flap, Bf/Vf:, Ventral flap, Sb: Setal blade

Contrary to the original diagnosis, the division of body segments (segmental boundaries) can be visible externally[10][5][3] and no known member of Radiodonta (except the putative radiodont Cucumericrus[10][26]) is known to have pediform trunk appendages (legs).[27] The trunk has numerous body segments (somites), tapering from anterior to posterior, with the anterior three or four segments significantly constricted into a neck region.[3]

The trunk appendages were fin-like body flaps ('lateral flaps' or 'lobes' in some studies), usually one pair of ventral flaps per body segment, each slightly overlapping the one more anterior to it, but additional, non-overlapping sets of small dorsal flaps may occur in some Hurdiid species.[10] The flaps may have numerous vein-like structures (referred to as 'strengthening rays',[5] 'flap rays',[3] 'tranverse rods',[10] 'transverse lines'[28] or 'veins'[29]). The flaps on the neck region (referred to as 'reduced flaps',[4] 'neck flaps',[5] 'head flaps',[27] 'anterior flaps'[30] or 'differentiated flaps'[18]) are significantly reduced. In some species, jaw-like feeding appendages called gnathobase-like structures (GLSs) arose from each of the bases of their reduced neck flaps.[4][1] Numerous elongated blade-like extensions (referred to as lanceolate blades or lamellae[3]) arranged in a row, forming bands of gill-like structures known as setal blades, covered the dorsal surface of each body segment.[10] At least in Aegirocassis, each of the lanceolate blades are covered in wrinkles.[10] The ventral flaps may be homologous to the endopod of the biramous limbs of euarthropods and lobopodous limbs (lobopods) of gilled lobopodians, and the dorsal flaps and setal blades may be homologous to the exite and gill-bearing dorsal flaps of the former taxa.[31][10] The trunk may end either with a tail fan compose of 1 to 3 pairs of blades,[29][27][3] a pair of long furcae,[29][13][3] an elongated terminal structure,[27] or a featureless blunt tip.[10]

Internal structures

[edit]
digestive system of a radiodont
Various interpretations of radiodont brain. A: after Cong et al. 2014,[9] B: after Moysiuk & Caron 2022[22]

Traces of muscles, digestive system and nervous system were described from some radiodont fossils. Pairs of well-developed muscles were connected to the ventral flaps located at the lateral cavities of each body segment.[27][9] Between the lateral muscles is a sophisticated digestive system, formed by a widening of the foregut and hindgut, both connected by a narrow midgut associated with six pairs of gut divercula (digestive glands).[27][5][32]

The brain of radiodonts was simpler than the three-segmented (compose of pro-, deuto- and tritocerebrum) brains of euarthropods, but further interpretations differ between studies. Based on Cong et al. 2014, the brain composed of only one brain segment originating from the ocular somite, the protocerebrum. The nerves of the frontal appendages and compound eyes arose from the anterior and lateral regions of the brain.[9][17] Based on Moysiuk & Caron 2022, the frontal appendage nerves arose from the ventral deutocerebrum, the second brain segment. The previous "frontal appendage nerves" actually represent median eye nerve.[22] In both interpretations, posterior to the brain was a pair of apparently unfused ventral nerve cords which ran through the animal's neck region.[9][22]

Paleoecology

[edit]

Physiology

[edit]
Reconstruction of Shucaris, an anomalocaridid or amplectobeluiid radiodont, using its frontal appendages to capture a fleeing Erratus
Reconstruction of the Fezouata Biota, featuring Aegirocassis, a filter feeding radiodont, and two species of Pseudoangustidontus

Radiodonts were interpreted as nektonic or nektobenthic animals, with their morphology suggesting an active swimming lifestyle. The muscular, overlapping ventral flaps may have propelled the animal through the water, possibly by moving in a wave-like formation resembling modern rays and cuttlefish.[33][34] Pairs of dorsal flaps, which make up a tail fan in some species, may have helped steering and/or stabilizing the animal during locomotion.[10][35] In Anomalocaris, morphology of the tail fan even suggests it could rapidly change its swimming direction efficiently.[36] On the other hand, some hurdiids have features significantly specialized for a nektobenthic lifestyle, such as Cambroraster with its dome-like H-element similar to the carapace of a horseshoe crab.[3] Bands of setal blades with wrinkling lanceolate blades may have increased the surface area, suggesting they were gills, providing the animal's respiratory function.[27][10] Abundance of the remains of scleritzed structures such as disarticulated frontal appendages and head sclerite complexes, suggest that mass moulting events may have occurred among radiodonts,[10][3] a behavior which also has been reported in some other Cambrian arthropods such as trilobites.[37]

Diet

[edit]
Suggested frontal appendage mobility and movement of various radiodonts[21][11]

Radiodonts had diverse feeding strategies, which could be categorized as raptorial predators, sediment sifters, or suspension, filter feeders.[2][38][11][39][40] For example, raptorial predators like Anomalocaris and Amplectobeluids might have been able to catch agile prey by using their raptorial frontal appendages; the latter even bore a robust endite for holding prey like a pincer.[26][21][4][11] With the smaller head carapace complex and large surface of arthrodial membranes, frontal appendages of these taxa had greater flexibility.[13] Stout frontal appendages of sediment sifters like Hurdia and Peytoia have serrated endites with mesial curvature, which could form a basket-like trap for raking through sediment and passing food items towards the well-developed oral cone.[3][11] Endites of frontal appendages from suspension/filter feeders like Tamisiocaris and Aegirocassis have flexible, densely-packed auxiliary spines, which could filter out organic components such as mesozooplankton and phytoplankton down to 0.5mm.[7][10] Frontal appendages of Caryosyntrips, which are unusual for radiodonts in having the direction of endite-bearing surfaces opposing one another and may have been able to manipulate and crush prey in a scissor-like slicing or grasping motion.[21][41]

Oral cones of radiodonts may have been used for suction and/or biting.[23][38][3] Together with the great variety of frontal appendages in different species of radiodonts, differentiation of oral cones between species suggests preferences of different diets as well.[38][11] For example, the triradial oral cone of Anomalocaris with irregular, tuberculated toothplates and a small opening may have been adapted to small and nektonic prey,[23][11] while the rigid tetraradial oral cones of Peytoia, Titanokorys, Hurdia, and one isolated oral cone attributed to Cambroraster with a larger opening and sometimes additional tooth plates may have been capable to consume larger food items relative to their body size and probably benthic or endobenthic prey.[23][38][3]

Classification

[edit]

Taxonomic affinities

[edit]
Ecdysozoa
Cycloneuralia

Priapulida and relatives

Panarthropoda

Onychophora

Tardigrada

Lobopodian grade
(paraphyletic)

Siberiid lobopodians

Pambdelurion

Kerygmachela

Opabiniidae

Radiodonta

Euarthropoda

Summarized phylogeny between Radiodonta and other Ecdysozoan taxa[42]

Most phylogenetic analyses suggest that radiodonts, alongside opabiniids (Opabinia and Utaurora[44]), are stem-group arthropods just basal to deuteropoda,[42] a clade including upper stem (e.g. fuxianhuiids and bivalved arthropods) and crown Euarthropoda (e.g. Artiopoda, Chelicerata and Mandibulata).[8][45][46][47][48][49][7][9][10][2][3][30][18][39][40][50][51][44] This interpretation is supported by numerous arthropod groundplan found on radiodonts and opabiniids, such as stalked compound eyes,[25] digestive glands,[32] trunk appendages forming by dorsal and ventral elements (precursor of arthropod biramous appendages).[10][51] Compared to opabiniids, which possess posterior mouth opening and fused frontalmost appendages (comparable to euarthropod posterior-facing labrum/hypostome complex),[17][44] radiodonts on the other hand featured euarthropod-like dorsal sclerite (H-element) and arthropodization (frontal appendages) on their head regions,[52][17][44] alongside cuticularized gut termini.[27] The fact that both radiodonts and opabiniids lack exoskeleton on their trunk region suggests that the origin of compound eyes and arthropodization (segmented appendages) precede arthrodization (full set of trunk exoskeleton) in the arthropod stem lineage.[42][53][54] The constricted neck region with feeding appendicular structures of some radiodont may also shed light on the origin of the sophisticated arthropod head, which was formed by the fusion of multiple anterior body segments.[4][17] Basal deuteropods that possess a mixture of radiodont/opabiniid characters like Kylinxia and Erratus, may represent intermediate forms between radiodonts, opabiniids and other euarthropods.[18][51]

Taxa just basal to the radiodont, opabiniid and euarthropod branch are 'gilled lobopodians' like Pambdelurion and Kerygmachela, which occasionally united under the class Dinocaridida with opabibiids and radiodonts.[55][47] They have body flaps, digestive glands, large (presumely compound) eyes and specialized frontal appendages like the former taxa, but their frontal appendages are not arthropodized nor fused, eyes sessile, gill-like structures less prominent, and certainly bore lobopod underneath each of their flaps.[56][10][57][44] Taxa even basal to 'gilled lobopodians' are siberiids like Megadictyon and Jianshanopodia,[42] a group of lobopodians that bore robust frontal appendages and digestive glands, but no body flaps. Such intermediate forms between lobopodian and radiodont/euarthropod suggest that the total-group Arthropoda arose from a paraphyletic lobopodian grade, alongside the other two extant panarthropod phyla Tardigrada and Onychophora.[58][42][17][59][53][54]

Previous studies may suggest radiodonts as a group other than stem-arthropods, such as a hitherto unknown phylum;[33] cycloneuralian worms undergone convergent with arthropods (based on the cycloneuralian-like radial mouthparts);[60][55] stem chelicerate euarthropods alongside megacheirans also known as great appendage arthropods (based on the similarity between radiodont frontal appendages, megacheiran great appendages and chelicerae);[61] or Schinderhannes bartelsi, which resolved as a hurdiid radiodont in recent analyses,[42][7][10][2][3][39][40] as a species more closely related to euarthropods than other radiodonts (based on some putative euarthropod-like features found on Schinderhannes).[35] However, neither each of them were supported by later investigations. The radial mouthparts are not cycloneuralian-exclusive and more likely present result of convergent evolution or ecdysozoan plesimorphy, since they also have been found in panarthropods such as tardigrade and some lobopodians;[62] radiodonts lacking definitive euarthropod features such as trunk tergites and multiple head appendages,[42] and the megacheiran great appendages were considered to be deutocerebral,[63][64] which could be non-homologous to the radiodont protocerebral frontal appendages;[9][17] putative euarthropod characters found on the single Schinderhannes fossil is questionable and may present other radiodont-like structures.[42]

Interrelationships

[edit]
Phylogeny of Radiodonta after Moysiuk & Caron 2021[39]

Traditionally, all radiodont species have been placed within one family, Anomalocarididae,[6] hence the previous common name 'anomalocaridid'[26][8] and it was still occasionally used to refer the whole order even after reclassification.[9][10] Since the reassignment done by Vinther et al. 2014, most of the radiodont species were reclassified within three new families: Amplectobeluidae, Tamisiocarididae[2][3] (formerly Cetiocaridae[7]), and Hurdiidae.[7][10][2][3] Including Anomalocarididae, the four recent radiodont families may form the clade Anomalocarida.[7]

The original description of the order Radiodonta included Anomalocaris, Laggania (later known as Peytoia), Hurdia, Proboscicaris, Amplectobelua, Cucumericrus, and Parapeytoia.[6] However, Proboscicaris is now regarded as a junior synonym of Hurdia, and Parapeytoia is considered to be a Megacheiran.[8][27][10] Due to the limited discovery, The position of Cucumericrus within Radiodonta is unclear, as it was either unselected by phylogenetic analysis[7][3][2][39][40] or resolved in a polytomy with Radiodonta and Euarthropoda.[10][13]

The first in-depth phylogenetic analysis of Radiodonta was conducted by Vinther et al. in 2014,[7] followed by a handful of subsequest studies with more or less modified results.[9][10][2][13][3][39][40][44] In most analysis, Caryosyntrips is the basal-most genus, but either resolved in a polytomy with other radiodonts and Euarthropoda (alongside Cucumericrus if included[10][13]) or outside of Radiodonta, casting doubt on its radiodont affinity.[65] With the exclusion of questionable Caryosyntrips and Cucumericrus, the monophyly of Radiodonta is widely supported,[7][9][10][2][13][3][39][40] with a few results suggest possible paraphyly (either the Anomalocarididae+Amplectobeluidae clade or Hurdiidae sister to Euarthropoda).[30][44] Putative synapomorphies of monophyletic Radiodonta including tripartite head sclerite complex and differentiated neck region.[3] The genus Anomalocaris in a broader sense always found to be polyphyletic, usually with "Anomalocaris" kunmingensis and "Anomalocaris" briggsi resolved as a member of Amplectobeluidae and Tamisiocarididae respectively.[7][9][10][2][3][39][40] Interrelationship of Amplectobeluidae is uncertain, as the amplectobeluid affinities of Lyrarapax and Ramskoeldia were occasionally questioned.[1][3][40] Monophyly of the speciose family Hurdiidae was recovered by most analysis and well-supported by several synapomorphies (e.g. distal articulated region of frontal appendage with proximal 5 podomeres bearing subequal endites[19][3]). Tamisiocarididae was often suggested to be sister group of Hurdiidae in the 2010s,[7][10][2][3] but this position became questionable in subsequent studies.[22][24]

Described species of Radiodonta
Species Original description Year named Family Age Location Frontal appendage Head sclerite complex
Cucumericrus decoratus Hou, Bergström, & Ahlberg 1995[26] (unassigned) Cambrian Stage 3  China Unknown Unknown
Caryosyntrips serratus Daley & Budd 2010[21] (unassigned) WuliuanDrumian  Canada  United States Unknown
Caryosyntrips camurus Pates & Daley 2017[41] (unassigned) Wuliuan  Canada  United States Incomplete[80]
Caryosyntrips durus Pates & Daley 2017[41] (unassigned) Drumian  United States Unknown
Paranomalocaris multisegmentalis Wang, Huang, & Hu 2013[67] Anomalocarididae? Cambrian Stage 4  China Unknown
Paranomalocaris simplex Jiao, Pates, Lerosey-Aubril, Ortega-Hernandez, Yang, Lan, Zhang 2021[68] Anomalocarididae? Cambrian Stage 4  China Unknown
Laminacaris chimera Guo, Pates, Cong, Daley, Edgecombe, Chen, & Hou 2018[69] (controversial) Cambrian Stage 3  China Unknown
Innovatiocaris maotianshanensis Zeng, Zhao, Zhu 2022[71] (unassigned) Cambrian Stage 3  China P-element unknown[71]
Innovatiocaris? multispiniformis Zeng, Zhao, Zhu 2022[71] (unassigned) Cambrian Stage 3  China Unknown
Anomalocaris canadensis Whiteaves 1892[81] Anomalocarididae Wuliuan  United States
Lenisicaris pennsylvanica (formerly Anomalocaris pennsylvanica)[20] Resser 1929 Anomalocarididae Cambrian Stage 3  United States Unknown
Lenisicaris lupata Wu, Ma, Lin, Sun, Zhang, & Fu 2021[20] Anomalocarididae Cambrian Stage 3  China Unknown
Anomalocaris daleyae Paterson, García-Bellidob & Edgecombe 2023 Anomalocarididae Cambrian Stage 4  Australia Unknown
Houcaris magnabasis (formerly Anomalocaris magnabasis)[70] Pates, Daley, Edgecombe, Cong & Lieberman 2019 (controversial) Cambrian Stage 4  United States Unknown
Houcaris saron (formerly Anomalocaris saron)[70] Hou, Bergström, & Ahlberg 1995 (controversial) Cambrian Stage 3  China Unknown
Echidnacaris briggsi[24] Nedin 1995 Tamisiocarididae Cambrian Stage 4  Australia Possible H-element and unique lateral sclerites associated with compound eyes[14][24]
Ramskoeldia platyacantha Cong, Edgecombe, Daley, Guo, Pates, & Hou 2018[1] Amplectobeluidae Cambrian Stage 3  China Incomplete[1]
Ramskoeldia consimilis Cong, Edgecombe, Daley, Guo, Pates, & Hou 2018[1] Amplectobeluidae Cambrian Stage 3  China Incomplete[1]
Lyrarapax unguispinus Cong, Ma, Hou, Edgecombe, & Strausfield 2014[9] Amplectobeluidae Cambrian Stage 3  China P-element neck unknown
Lyrarapax trilobus Cong, Daley, Edgecombe, Hou, & Chen 2016[5] Amplectobeluidae Cambrian Stage 3  China P-element unknown
Amplectobelua symbrachiata Hou, Bergström, & Ahlberg 1995[26] Amplectobeluidae Cambrian Stage 3  China
Amplectobelua stephenensis Daley & Budd 2010[21] Amplectobeluidae Wuliuan  United States Unknown
Guanshancaris kunmingensis Zhang et al. 2023[73] Amplectobeluidae Cambrian Stage 4  China Unknown
Tamisiocaris borealis Daley & Peel 2010 Tamisiocarididae Cambrian Stage 3  Greenland Incomplete[7]
Ursulinacaris grallae Pates, Daley & Butterfield 2019 Hurdiidae Wuliuan  Canada Unknown
Schinderhannes bartelsi Kühl, Briggs, & Rust 2009[35] Hurdiidae Emsian  Germany Incomplete[3] Incomplete[3]
Stanleycaris hirpex Pates, Daley, & Ortega-Hernández 2018[78] Hurdiidae Wuliuan  Canada P-element is unknown, possibly absent[22]
Peytoia nathorsti Walcott 1911[82] Hurdiidae WuliuanDrumian  Canada  United States Incomplete[3]
Peytoia infercambriensis (formerly Cassubia infercambriensis)[83] Lendzion 1975 Hurdiidae Cambrian Stage 3  Poland Unknown
Aegirocassis benmoulai Van Roy, Daley, & Briggs 2015[10] Hurdiidae (Aegirocassisinae) Tremadocian  Morocco
Hurdia victoria Walcott 1912[84] Hurdiidae WuliuanDrumian  Canada  Czechia
Hurdia triangulata Walcott 1912[84] Hurdiidae Wuliuan  Canada
Cambroraster falcatus Moysiuk & Caron 2019[3] Hurdiidae Wuliuan  Canada
Pahvantia hastata Robison & Richards 1981 Hurdiidae Drumian  United States
Cordaticaris striatus Sun, Zeng, & Zhao 2020[79] Hurdiidae Drumian  China Incomplete[79]
Zhenghecaris shankouensis Vanner, Chen, Huang, Charbonnier, & Wang 2006 Hurdiidae Cambrian Stage 3  China Unknown [66]
Buccaspinea cooperi Pates, Lerosey-Aubril, Daley, Kier, Bonino & Ortega-Hernández 2021[80] Hurdiidae Drumian  United States Unknown
Titanokorys gainesi Caron & Moysiuk 2021[40] Hurdiidae Wuliuan  Canada
Pseudoangustidontus duplospineus Van Roy & Tetlie 2006 Hurdiidae (Aegirocassisinae) Tremadocian  Morocco Unknown
Pseudoangustidontus izdigua Potin, Gueriau & Daley 2023 Hurdiidae (Aegirocassisinae) Tremadocian  Morocco Incomplete[74]
Shucaris ankylosskelos Wu et al. 2024 (controversial) Cambrian Stage 2Cambrian Stage 3  China
Incomplete[72]
Stanleycaris qingjiangensis Wu et al. 2024 Hurdiidae Cambrian stage 3  China Incomplete[85]

History

[edit]
Body specimen of Peytoia nathorsti, the original "Laggania cambria"

The history of radiodonts is complex. Incomplete specimens pertaining to different body parts of the same species had historically been interpreted as belonging to different species and even different phyla.[6][8] Prior to their recognition as a group, radiodont specimens had been assigned to five different phyla: Porifera, Cnidaria, Echinodermata, Annelida, and Arthropoda.[6]

The first known radiodont specimens were collected from the trilobite beds of Mount Stephen by Richard G. McConnell of the Geological Survey of Canada in 1886[6] or 1888.[81] These specimens were named Anomalocaris canadensis in 1892 by GSC paleontologist Joseph Whiteaves.[81] Whiteaves interpreted the specimens, now known to be isolated frontal appendages, as the abdomen of a phyllocarid crustacean.[81] Additional radiodont specimens were described in 1911 by Charles Walcott.[82] He interpreted an isolated oral cone, which he named Peytoia nathorsti, as a jellyfish, and a poorly-preserved but relatively complete specimen, which he named Laggania cambria, as a holothurian.[82] In 1912 Walcott named Hurdia victoria and H. triangulata based on isolated H-elements, which he interpreted as the carapaces of crustaceans.[84] Isolated frontal appendages of Peytoia and Hurdia, collectively known as "Appendage F" in Briggs 1979, were all identified as those of Sidneyia at that time.[82] A Hurdia P-element was named Proboscicaris in 1962, and interpreted as the carapace of a bivalved arthropod.[86]

The Geological Survey of Canada initiated a revision of Burgess Shale fossils in 1966, overseen by Cambridge University paleontologist Harry B. Whittington.[6] This revision would ultimately lead to the discovery of the complete radiodont body plan. In 1978, Simon Conway Morris recognized that the mouthparts of Laggania were Peytoia-like, but he interpreted this as evidence that it was a composite fossil made up of a Peytoia jellyfish and a sponge.[87] In 1979, Derek Briggs recognized that the fossils of Anomalocaris were appendages, not abdomens, but interpreted them as walking legs alongside "Appendage F".[88] It was not until 1985 that the true nature of the fossils of Anomalocaris, Laggania, and Peytoia was recognized, and they were all assigned to a single genus, Anomalocaris.[33] Subsequently, it was recognized that Anomalocaris was a distinct form from the other two, resulting in a split into two genera, the latter of which was variously named Laggania and Peytoia until it was determined that both represent the same species and Peytoia had priority.[23] It was later recognized that some of the fossils assigned to these taxa belonged to another form, which was recognized as bearing a carapace made up of Hurdia and Proboscicaris elements. Finally, in 2009, these specimens were redescribed as Hurdia.[8] Even after these recognitions, partial misidentifications (e.g. oral cone and frontal appendages of Peytoia had been assigned to Anomalocaris[6] and Hurdia,[8] respectively) had been revealed by subsequent studies as well.[23][89]

The taxon Radiodonta itself was coined in 1996 by Desmond Collins, after it was established that Anomalocaris and its kin represented a distinctive lineage with arthropod affinities rather than a hitherto unknown phylum.[6] Collins also established the class Dinocarida to contain the order Radiodonta as well as the Opabiniidae, which he recognized as distinct due to its lacking the distinctive oral cone structure of radiodonts.[6] Radiodonta was first given a phylogenetic definition in 2014.[7] Radiodonta was originally viewed as containing a single family, Anomalocarididae, but it was divided into four families in 2014: Amplectobeluidae, Anomalocarididae, Cetiocaridae, and Hurdiidae.[7] The name Cetiocaridae did not conform to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature and so was renamed Tamisiocarididae in 2019.[90]

Until the 2010s, radiodonts were typically considered to be uniformly large apex predators, but discoveries of new species over the course of that decade led to a considerable increase in the known ecological and morphological diversity of the group.[7][10][2][3][91][80][39][40]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Cong, Pei-Yun; Edgecombe, Gregory D.; Daley, Allison C.; Guo, Jin; Pates, Stephen; Hou, Xian-Guang (2018). "New radiodonts with gnathobase-like structures from the Cambrian Chengjiang biota and implications for the systematics of Radiodonta". Papers in Palaeontology. 4 (4): 605–621. doi:10.1002/spp2.1219. ISSN 2056-2802. S2CID 90258934.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t Lerosey-Aubril, Rudy; Pates, Stephen (14 September 2018). "New suspension-feeding radiodont suggests evolution of microplanktivory in Cambrian macronekton". Nature Communications. 9 (1): 3774. Bibcode:2018NatCo...9.3774L. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06229-7. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 6138677. PMID 30218075. Dryad Data
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an Moysiuk, J.; Caron, J.-B. (14 August 2019). "A new hurdiid radiodont from the Burgess Shale evinces the exploitation of Cambrian infaunal food sources". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 286 (1908): 20191079. doi:10.1098/rspb.2019.1079. PMC 6710600. PMID 31362637.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h Cong, Peiyun; Daley, Allison C.; Edgecombe, Gregory D.; Hou, Xianguang (30 August 2017). "The functional head of the Cambrian radiodontan (stem-group Euarthropoda) Amplectobelua symbrachiata". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 17 (1): 208. doi:10.1186/s12862-017-1049-1. ISSN 1471-2148. PMC 5577670. PMID 28854872.
  5. ^ a b c d e f Cong, Peiyun; Daley, Allison C.; Edgecombe, Gregory D.; Hou, Xianguang; Chen, Ailin (September 2016). "Morphology of the radiodontan Lyrarapax from the early Cambrian Chengjiang biota". Journal of Paleontology. 90 (4): 663–671. doi:10.1017/jpa.2016.67. ISSN 0022-3360. S2CID 88742430.
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Collins, Desmond (1996). "The "evolution" of Anomalocaris and its classification in the arthropod class Dinocarida (nov.) and order Radiodonta (nov.)". Journal of Paleontology. 70 (2): 280–293. doi:10.1017/S0022336000023362. S2CID 131622496.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t Vinther, Jakob; Stein, Martin; Longrich, Nicholas R.; Harper, David A. T. (2014). "A suspension-feeding anomalocarid from the Early Cambrian" (PDF). Nature. 507 (7493): 496–499. Bibcode:2014Natur.507..496V. doi:10.1038/nature13010. PMID 24670770. S2CID 205237459.
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Daley, Allison C.; Budd, Graham E.; Caron, Jean-Bernard; Edgecombe, Gregory D.; Collins, Desmond (2009). "The Burgess Shale anomalocaridid Hurdia and its significance for early euarthropod evolution". Science. 323 (5921): 1597–1600. Bibcode:2009Sci...323.1597D. doi:10.1126/science.1169514. PMID 19299617. S2CID 206517995.
  9. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Cong, Peiyun; Ma, Xiaoya; Hou, Xianguang; Edgecombe, Gregory D.; Strausfeld, Nicholas J. (2014). "Brain structure resolves the segmental affinity of anomalocaridid appendages". Nature. 513 (7519): 538–42. Bibcode:2014Natur.513..538C. doi:10.1038/nature13486. PMID 25043032. S2CID 4451239.
  10. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af Van Roy, Peter; Daley, Allison C.; Briggs, Derek E. G. (2015). "Anomalocaridid trunk limb homology revealed by a giant filter-feeder with paired flaps". Nature. 522 (7554): 77–80. Bibcode:2015Natur.522...77V. doi:10.1038/nature14256. PMID 25762145. S2CID 205242881.
  11. ^ a b c d e f g h De Vivo, Giacinto; Lautenschlager, Stephan; Vinther, Jakob (28 July 2021). "Three-dimensional modelling, disparity and ecology of the first Cambrian apex predators". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 288 (1955): 20211176. doi:10.1098/rspb.2021.1176. PMC 8292756. PMID 34284622.
  12. ^ Foster, J. (2014). "Magical Mystery Tour: The Biological Psychedelia of the Burgess Shale". Cambrian Ocean World: Ancient Sea Life of North America. Indiana University Press. pp. 195–252. ISBN 978-0253011824.
  13. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Liu, Jianni; Lerosey-Aubril, Rudy; Steiner, Michael; Dunlop, Jason A.; Shu, Degan; Paterson, John R. (1 November 2018). "Origin of raptorial feeding in juvenile euarthropods revealed by a Cambrian radiodontan". National Science Review. 5 (6): 863–869. doi:10.1093/nsr/nwy057. ISSN 2095-5138.
  14. ^ a b c Pates, Stephen; Botting, Joseph P.; McCobb, Lucy M. E.; Muir, Lucy A. (2020). "A miniature Ordovician hurdiid from Wales demonstrates the adaptability of Radiodonta". Royal Society Open Science. 7 (6): 200459. Bibcode:2020RSOS....700459P. doi:10.1098/rsos.200459. ISSN 2054-5703. PMC 7353989. PMID 32742697.
  15. ^ Wu, Yu; Pates, Stephen; Pauly, Daniel; Zhang, Xingliang; Fu, Dongjing (3 November 2023). "Rapid growth in a large Cambrian apex predator". National Science Review. doi:10.1093/nsr/nwad284. ISSN 2095-5138. PMC 10833464.
  16. ^ a b Caron, J.-B.; Moysiuk, J. (September 2021). "A giant nektobenthic radiodont from the Burgess Shale and the significance of hurdiid carapace diversity". Royal Society Open Science. 8 (9): 210664. Bibcode:2021RSOS....810664C. doi:10.1098/rsos.210664. PMC 8424305. PMID 34527273.
  17. ^ a b c d e f g h i Ortega-Hernández, Javier; Janssen, Ralf; Budd, Graham E. (1 May 2017). "Origin and evolution of the panarthropod head – A palaeobiological and developmental perspective". Arthropod Structure & Development. Evolution of Segmentation. 46 (3): 354–379. doi:10.1016/j.asd.2016.10.011. ISSN 1467-8039. PMID 27989966.
  18. ^ a b c d Zeng, Han; Zhao, Fangchen; Niu, Kecheng; Zhu, Maoyan; Huang, Diying (2020). "An early Cambrian euarthropod with radiodont-like raptorial appendages". Nature. 588 (7836): 101–105. Bibcode:2020Natur.588..101Z. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2883-7. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 33149303. S2CID 226248177.
  19. ^ a b c d e f Pates, Stephen; Daley, Allison C.; Butterfield, Nicholas J. (11 June 2019). "First report of paired ventral endites in a hurdiid radiodont". Zoological Letters. 5 (1): 18. doi:10.1186/s40851-019-0132-4. ISSN 2056-306X. PMC 6560863. PMID 31210962.
  20. ^ a b c d e Wu, Yu; Ma, Jiaxin; Lin, Weiliang; Sun, Ao; Zhang, Xingliang; Fu, Dongjing (1 May 2021). "New anomalocaridids (Panarthropoda: Radiodonta) from the lower Cambrian Chengjiang Lagerstätte: Biostratigraphic and paleobiogeographic implications". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 569: 110333. Bibcode:2021PPP...569k0333W. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2021.110333. ISSN 0031-0182. S2CID 233565727.
  21. ^ a b c d e f g h Daley, Allison C.; Budd, Graham E. (2010). "New anomalocaridid appendages from the Burgess Shale, Canada". Palaeontology. 53 (4): 721–738. Bibcode:2010Palgy..53..721D. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2010.00955.x. ISSN 1475-4983.
  22. ^ a b c d e f g Moysiuk, Joseph; Caron, Jean-Bernard (8 August 2022). "A three-eyed radiodont with fossilized neuroanatomy informs the origin of the arthropod head and segmentation". Current Biology. 32 (15): 3302–3316.e2. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.06.027. ISSN 0960-9822. PMID 35809569. S2CID 250361698.
  23. ^ a b c d e f Daley, Allison C.; Bergström, Jan (April 2012). "The oral cone of Anomalocaris is not a classic peytoia". Naturwissenschaften. 99 (6): 501–504. Bibcode:2012NW.....99..501D. doi:10.1007/s00114-012-0910-8. ISSN 0028-1042. PMID 22476406. S2CID 2042726.
  24. ^ a b c d Paterson, John R.; García-Bellido, Diego C.; Edgecombe, Gregory D. (1 January 2023). "The early Cambrian Emu Bay Shale radiodonts revisited: morphology and systematics". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 21 (1). doi:10.1080/14772019.2023.2225066. ISSN 1477-2019. S2CID 259719252.
  25. ^ a b Strausfeld, Nicholas J.; Ma, Xiaoya; Edgecombe, Gregory D.; Fortey, Richard A.; Land, Michael F.; Liu, Yu; Cong, Peiyun; Hou, Xianguang (August 2015). "Arthropod eyes: The early Cambrian fossil record and divergent evolution of visual systems". Arthropod Structure & Development. 45 (2): 152–172. doi:10.1016/j.asd.2015.07.005. PMID 26276096.
  26. ^ a b c d e f g Xian-Guang, Hou; Bergström, Jan; Ahlberg, Per (September 1995). "Anomalocaris and other large animals in the lower Cambrian Chengjiang fauna of southwest China". GFF. 117 (3): 163–183. doi:10.1080/11035899509546213. ISSN 1103-5897.
  27. ^ a b c d e f g h i Daley, Allison C.; Edgecombe, Gregory D. (2014). "Morphology of Anomalocaris canadensis from the Burgess Shale". Journal of Paleontology. 88 (1): 68–91. doi:10.1666/13-067. S2CID 86683798.
  28. ^ Daley, Allison C.; Paterson, John R.; Edgecombe, Gregory D.; García-Bellido, Diego C.; Jago, James B. (2013). "New anatomical information on Anomalocaris from the Cambrian Emu Bay Shale of South Australia and a reassessment of its inferred predatory habits". Palaeontology. 56 (5): 971–990. doi:10.1111/pala.12029. ISSN 1475-4983. S2CID 128955512.
  29. ^ a b c Chen, Jun-yuan; Ramsköld, Lars; Zhou, Gui-qing (27 May 1994). "Evidence for Monophyly and Arthropod Affinity of Cambrian Giant Predators". Science. 264 (5163): 1304–1308. Bibcode:1994Sci...264.1304C. doi:10.1126/science.264.5163.1304. PMID 17780848. S2CID 1913482.
  30. ^ a b c Aria, Cédric; Zhao, Fangchen; Zeng, Han; Guo, Jin; Zhu, Maoyan (8 January 2020). "Fossils from South China redefine the ancestral euarthropod body plan". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 20 (1): 4. doi:10.1186/s12862-019-1560-7. ISSN 1471-2148. PMC 6950928. PMID 31914921.
  31. ^ Van Roy, Peter; Daley, Allison C.; Briggs, Derek E. G. (2013). Anomalocaridids had two sets of lateral flaps. 57th Annual Meeting of The Paleontological Association. Zurich, Switzerland.
  32. ^ a b Vannier, Jean; Liu, Jianni; Lerosey-Aubril, Rudy; Vinther, Jakob; Daley, Allison C. (2 May 2014). "Sophisticated digestive systems in early arthropods". Nature Communications. 5 (1): 3641. Bibcode:2014NatCo...5.3641V. doi:10.1038/ncomms4641. ISSN 2041-1723. PMID 24785191.
  33. ^ a b c Whittington, Harry Blackmore; Briggs, Derek Ernest Gilmor (14 May 1985). "The largest Cambrian animal, Anomalocaris, Burgess Shale, British-Columbia". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences. 309 (1141): 569–609. Bibcode:1985RSPTB.309..569W. doi:10.1098/rstb.1985.0096.
  34. ^ Usami, Yoshiyuki (7 January 2006). "Theoretical study on the body form and swimming pattern of Anomalocaris based on hydrodynamic simulation". Journal of Theoretical Biology. 238 (1): 11–17. Bibcode:2006JThBi.238...11U. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.05.008. ISSN 0022-5193. PMID 16002096.
  35. ^ a b c Kühl, Gabriele; Briggs, Derek E. G.; Rust, Jes (6 February 2009). "A Great-Appendage Arthropod with a Radial Mouth from the Lower Devonian Hunsrück Slate, Germany". Science. 323 (5915): 771–773. Bibcode:2009Sci...323..771K. doi:10.1126/science.1166586. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 19197061. S2CID 47555807.
  36. ^ Sheppard, K. A.; Rival, D. E.; Caron, J.-B. (1 October 2018). "On the Hydrodynamics of Anomalocaris Tail Fins". Integrative and Comparative Biology. 58 (4): 703–711. doi:10.1093/icb/icy014. hdl:1974/22737. ISSN 1540-7063. PMID 29697774.
  37. ^ Daley, Allison; Drage, Harriet (1 September 2015). "The fossil record of ecdysis, and trends in the moulting behaviour of trilobites". Arthropod Structure & Development. 45 (2): 71–96. doi:10.1016/j.asd.2015.09.004. PMID 26431634.
  38. ^ a b c d De Vivo, Giacinto; Lautenschlager, Stephan; Vinther, Jakob (16 December 2016). "Reconstructing anomalocaridid feeding appendage dexterity sheds light on radiodontan ecology".
  39. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Moysiuk, Joseph; Caron, Jean-Bernard (2021). "Exceptional multifunctionality in the feeding apparatus of a mid-Cambrian radiodont". Paleobiology. 47 (4): 704–724. Bibcode:2021Pbio...47..704M. doi:10.1017/pab.2021.19. ISSN 0094-8373. S2CID 236552819.
  40. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Caron, J.-B.; Moysiuk, J. (2021). "A giant nektobenthic radiodont from the Burgess Shale and the significance of hurdiid carapace diversity". Royal Society Open Science. 8 (9): 210664. Bibcode:2021RSOS....810664C. doi:10.1098/rsos.210664. PMC 8424305. PMID 34527273.
  41. ^ a b c Pates, S.; Daley, A. C. (2017). "Caryosyntrips: a radiodontan from the Cambrian of Spain, USA and Canada". Papers in Palaeontology. 3 (3): 461–470. doi:10.1002/spp2.1084. ISSN 2056-2802. S2CID 135026011.
  42. ^ a b c d e f g h Ortega-Hernández, Javier (December 2014). "Making sense of 'lower' and 'upper' stem-group Euarthropoda, with comments on the strict use of the name Arthropoda von Siebold, 1848". Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 91 (1): 255–273. doi:10.1111/brv.12168. ISSN 1469-185X. PMID 25528950. S2CID 7751936.
  43. ^ Izquierdo-López, Alejandro; Caron, Jean-Bernard (December 2022). "The problematic Cambrian arthropod Tuzoia and the origin of mandibulates revisited". Royal Society Open Science. 9 (12). doi:10.1098/rsos.220933. ISSN 2054-5703.
  44. ^ a b c d e f g h Pates, Stephen; Wolfe, Joanna M.; Lerosey-Aubril, Rudy; Daley, Allison C.; Ortega-Hernández, Javier (9 February 2022). "New opabiniid diversifies the weirdest wonders of the euarthropod stem group". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 289 (1968): 20212093. doi:10.1098/rspb.2021.2093. PMC 8826304. PMID 35135344.
  45. ^ Edgecombe, Gregory D. (1 March 2010). "Arthropod phylogeny: An overview from the perspectives of morphology, molecular data and the fossil record". Arthropod Structure & Development. Fossil Record and Phylogeny of the Arthropoda. 39 (2): 74–87. doi:10.1016/j.asd.2009.10.002. ISSN 1467-8039. PMID 19854297.
  46. ^ Legg, David; Sutton, Mark; Edgecombe, Gregory; Caron, Jean-Bernard (10 October 2012). "Cambrian bivalved arthropod reveals origin of arthrodization". Proceedings. Biological Sciences. 279 (1748): 4699–4704. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.1958. PMC 3497099. PMID 23055069.
  47. ^ a b Legg, David (2013). "Multi-Segmented Arthropods from the Middle Cambrian of British Columbia (Canada)". Journal of Paleontology. 87 (3): 493–501. doi:10.1666/12-112.1. ISSN 0022-3360. S2CID 86725173.
  48. ^ Legg, David; Sutton, Mark; Edgecombe, Gregory (30 September 2013). "Arthropod fossil data increase congruence of morphological and molecular phylogenies". Nature Communications. 4: 2485. Bibcode:2013NatCo...4.2485L. doi:10.1038/ncomms3485. PMID 24077329.
  49. ^ Legg, David A.; Vannier, Jean (2013). "The affinities of the cosmopolitan arthropod Isoxys and its implications for the origin of arthropods". Lethaia. 46 (4): 540–550. doi:10.1111/let.12032. ISSN 1502-3931.
  50. ^ O’Flynn, Robert J.; Williams, Mark; Yu, Mengxiao; Harvey, Thomas H. P.; Liu, Yu (2022). "A new euarthropod with large frontal appendages from the early Cambrian Chengjiang biota". Palaeontologia Electronica. 25 (1): 1–21. doi:10.26879/1167. ISSN 1094-8074. S2CID 246779634.
  51. ^ a b c Fu, Dongjing; Legg, David A.; Daley, Allison C.; Budd, Graham E.; Wu, Yu; Zhang, Xingliang (28 March 2022). "The evolution of biramous appendages revealed by a carapace-bearing Cambrian arthropod". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 377 (1847): 20210034. doi:10.1098/rstb.2021.0034. PMC 8819368. PMID 35125000. S2CID 246608509.
  52. ^ Ortega-Hernández, Javier (15 June 2015). "Homology of Head Sclerites in Burgess Shale Euarthropods". Current Biology. 25 (12): 1625–1631. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.034. ISSN 0960-9822. PMID 25959966.
  53. ^ a b Giribet, Gonzalo; Edgecombe, Gregory D. (17 June 2019). "The Phylogeny and Evolutionary History of Arthropods". Current Biology. 29 (12): R592–R602. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.057. ISSN 0960-9822. PMID 31211983. S2CID 189926344.
  54. ^ a b Edgecombe, Gregory D. (2 November 2020). "Arthropod Origins: Integrating Paleontological and Molecular Evidence". Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 51 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-011720-124437. ISSN 1543-592X. S2CID 225478171.
  55. ^ a b Xianguang, Hou; Jan, Jan Bergström; Jiayu, In Rong; Zongjie, Fang; Zhanghe, Zhou; Renbin, Zhan; Xiangdong, Wang; Xunlai, Yuan; Xianguang, Hou (2006), Dinocaridids – anomalous arthropods or arthropod-like worms?, CiteSeerX 10.1.1.693.5869
  56. ^ Budd, Graham E. (1998). "The morphology and phylogenetic significance of Kerygmachela kierkegaardi Budd (Buen Formation, Lower Cambrian, N Greenland)". Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. 89 (4): 249–290. doi:10.1017/S0263593300002418. ISSN 1473-7116. S2CID 85645934.
  57. ^ Young, Fletcher J.; Vinther, Jakob (2017). "Onychophoran-like myoanatomy of the Cambrian gilled lobopodian Pambdelurion whittingtoni". Palaeontology. 60 (1): 27–54. Bibcode:2017Palgy..60...27Y. doi:10.1111/pala.12269. hdl:1983/92180ef0-2205-4c65-9a70-90d59cfea2f4. ISSN 1475-4983. S2CID 55477207.
  58. ^ Edgecombe, Gregory D. (2010). "Arthropod phylogeny: An overview from the perspectives of morphology, molecular data and the fossil record". Arthropod Structure & Development. 39 (2–3): 74–87. doi:10.1016/j.asd.2009.10.002. ISSN 1467-8039. PMID 19854297.
  59. ^ Daley, Allison C.; Antcliffe, Jonathan B.; Drage, Harriet B.; Pates, Stephen (22 May 2018). "Early fossil record of Euarthropoda and the Cambrian Explosion". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115 (21): 5323–5331. Bibcode:2018PNAS..115.5323D. doi:10.1073/pnas.1719962115. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 6003487. PMID 29784780.
  60. ^ Xian-Guang, Hou; Bergström, Jan; Ahlberg, Per (September 1995). "Anomalocaris and other large animals in the lower Cambrian Chengjiang fauna of southwest China". GFF. 117 (3): 163–183. doi:10.1080/11035899509546213. ISSN 1103-5897.
  61. ^ Haug, Joachim T.; Waloszek, Dieter; Maas, Andreas; Liu, Yu; Haug, Carolin (March 2012). "Functional morphology, ontogeny and evolution of mantis shrimp-like predators in the Cambrian: MANTIS SHRIMP-LIKE CAMBRIAN PREDATORS". Palaeontology. 55 (2): 369–399. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2011.01124.x. S2CID 82841481.
  62. ^ Smith, Martin R.; Caron, Jean-Bernard (June 2015). "Hallucigenia 's head and the pharyngeal armature of early ecdysozoans" (PDF). Nature. 523 (7558): 75–78. Bibcode:2015Natur.523...75S. doi:10.1038/nature14573. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 26106857. S2CID 205244325.
  63. ^ Tanaka, Gengo; Hou, Xianguang; Ma, Xiaoya; Edgecombe, Gregory D.; Strausfeld, Nicholas J. (October 2013). "Chelicerate neural ground pattern in a Cambrian great appendage arthropod". Nature. 502 (7471): 364–367. Bibcode:2013Natur.502..364T. doi:10.1038/nature12520. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 24132294. S2CID 4456458.
  64. ^ Ortega-Hernández, Javier; Lerosey-Aubril, Rudy; Pates, Stephen (18 December 2019). "Proclivity of nervous system preservation in Cambrian Burgess Shale-type deposits". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 286 (1917): 20192370. doi:10.1098/rspb.2019.2370. PMC 6939931. PMID 31822253.
  65. ^ a b c d e f g McCall, Christian R. A. (13 December 2023). "A large pelagic lobopodian from the Cambrian Pioche Shale of Nevada". Journal of Paleontology: 1–16. doi:10.1017/jpa.2023.63. ISSN 0022-3360.
  66. ^ a b c Zeng, Han; Zhao, Fangchen; Yin, Zongjun; Zhu, Maoyan (2 January 2018). "Morphology of diverse radiodontan head sclerites from the early Cambrian Chengjiang Lagerstätte, south-west China". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 16 (1): 1–37. doi:10.1080/14772019.2016.1263685. ISSN 1477-2019. S2CID 133549817.
  67. ^ a b Yuanyuan, Wang; Huang, Diying; Hu, Shixue (1 November 2013). "New anomalocardid frontal appendages from the Guanshan biota, eastern Yunnan". Chinese Science Bulletin. 58 (32): 3937–3942. Bibcode:2013ChSBu..58.3937W. doi:10.1007/s11434-013-5908-x. S2CID 83910779.
  68. ^ a b c Jiao, De-guang; Pates, Stephen; Lerosey-Aubril, Rudy; Ortega-Hernandez, Javier; Yang, Jie; Lan, Tian; Zhang, Xi-guang (2021). "The endemic radiodonts of the Cambrian Stage 4 Guanshan biota of South China". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 66. doi:10.4202/app.00870.2020. ISSN 0567-7920. S2CID 236683029.
  69. ^ a b Guo, J.; Pates, S.; Cong, P.; Daley, A. C.; Edgecombe, G. D.; Chen, T.; Hou, X. (2018). "A new radiodont (stem Euarthropoda) frontal appendage with a mosaic of characters from the Cambrian (Series 2 Stage 3) Chengjiang biota". Papers in Palaeontology. 5 (1). ISSN 2056-2799.
  70. ^ a b c Wu, Yu; Fu, Dongjing; Ma, Jiaxin; Lin, Weiliang; Sun, Ao; Zhang, Xingliang (1 June 2021). "Houcaris gen. nov. from the early Cambrian (Stage 3) Chengjiang Lagerstätte expanded the palaeogeographical distribution of tamisiocaridids (Panarthropoda: Radiodonta)". PalZ. 95 (2): 209–221. doi:10.1007/s12542-020-00545-4. ISSN 1867-6812. S2CID 235221043.
  71. ^ a b c d Zeng, Han; Zhao, Fangchen; Zhu, Maoyan (7 September 2022). "Innovatiocaris, a complete radiodont from the early Cambrian Chengjiang Lagerstätte and its implications for the phylogeny of Radiodonta". Journal of the Geological Society. 180. doi:10.1144/jgs2021-164. ISSN 0016-7649. S2CID 252147346.
  72. ^ a b c Wu, Yu; Pates, Stephen; Liu, Cong; Zhang, Mingjing; Lin, Weiliang; Ma, Jiaxin; Wu, Yuheng; Chai, Shu; Zhang, Xingliang; Fu, Dongjing (31 December 2024). "A new radiodont from the lower Cambrian (Series 2 Stage 3) Chengjiang Lagerstätte, South China informs the evolution of feeding structures in radiodonts". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 22 (1). doi:10.1080/14772019.2024.2364887. hdl:10871/136118. ISSN 1477-2019.
  73. ^ a b Zhang, Mingjing; Wu, Yu; Lin, Weiliang; Ma, Jiaxin; Wu, Yuheng; Fu, Dongjing (11 April 2023). "Amplectobeluid Radiodont Guanshancaris gen. nov. from the Lower Cambrian (Stage 4) Guanshan Lagerstätte of South China: Biostratigraphic and Paleobiogeographic Implications". Biology. 12 (4): 583. doi:10.3390/biology12040583. ISSN 2079-7737. PMC 10136193. PMID 37106783.
  74. ^ a b Potin, Gaëtan J.-M.; Gueriau, Pierre; Daley, Allison C. (2023). "Radiodont frontal appendages from the Fezouata Biota (Morocco) reveal high diversity and ecological adaptations to suspension-feeding during the Early Ordovician". Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 11. doi:10.3389/fevo.2023.1214109. ISSN 2296-701X.
  75. ^ Ortega-Hernández, Javier (December 2014). "Making sense of 'lower' and 'upper' stem-group Euarthropoda, with comments on the strict use of the name Arthropoda von Siebold, 1848". Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 91 (1): 255–273. doi:10.1111/brv.12168. ISSN 1469-185X. PMID 25528950. S2CID 7751936.
  76. ^ Zhu, X.; Lerosey-Aubril, R.; Ortega-Hernández, J. (2021). "Furongian (Jiangshanian) occurrences of radiodonts in Poland and South China and the fossil record of the Hurdiidae". PeerJ. 9. e11800. doi:10.7717/peerj.11800. PMC 8312493. PMID 34386302.
  77. ^ Potin, Gaëtan J.-M.; Daley, Allison C. (2023). "The significance of Anomalocaris and other Radiodonta for understanding paleoecology and evolution during the Cambrian explosion". Frontiers in Earth Science. 11. Bibcode:2023FrEaS..1160285P. doi:10.3389/feart.2023.1160285. ISSN 2296-6463.
  78. ^ a b Pates, Stephen; Daley, Allison; Ortega-Hernández, Javier (3 March 2018). Reply to Comment on "Aysheaia prolata from the Utah Wheeler Formation (Drumian, Cambrian) is a frontal appendage of the radiodontan Stanleycaris" with the formal description of Stanleycaris.
  79. ^ a b c Sun, Zhixin; Zeng, Han; Zhao, Fangchen (1 August 2020). "A new middle Cambrian radiodont from North China: Implications for morphological disparity and spatial distribution of hurdiids". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 558: 109947. Bibcode:2020PPP...558j9947S. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2020.109947. ISSN 0031-0182. S2CID 224868404.
  80. ^ a b c d Pates, Stephen; Lerosey-Aubril, Rudy; Daley, Allison C.; Kier, Carlo; Bonino, Enrico; Ortega-Hernández, Javier (19 January 2021). "The diverse radiodont fauna from the Marjum Formation of Utah, USA (Cambrian: Drumian)". PeerJ. 9: e10509. doi:10.7717/peerj.10509. ISSN 2167-8359. PMC 7821760. PMID 33552709.
  81. ^ a b c d Whiteaves, J. F. (1892). "Description of a new genus and species of phyllocarid Crustacea from the Middle Cambrian of Mount Stephen, B. C.". The Canadian Record of Science. 5 (4).
  82. ^ a b c d Walcott, C. D. 1911a. Middle Cambrian holothurians and medusae. Cambrian geoogy and paleontology II. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 57: 41–68.
  83. ^ Daley, Allison; Legg, David (2 July 2015). "A morphological and taxonomic appraisal of the oldest anomalocaridid from the Lower Cambrian of Poland". Geological Magazine. -1 (5): 949–955. Bibcode:2015GeoM..152..949D. doi:10.1017/S0016756815000412. S2CID 130745134.
  84. ^ a b c WALCOTT, C. D. 1912. Middle Cambrian Branchiopoda, Malacostraca, Trilobita and Merostomata. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 57: 145–228.
  85. ^ Wu, Yu; Pates, Stephen; Zhang, Mingjing; Lin, Weiliang; Ma, Jiaxin; Liu, Cong; Wu, Yuheng; Zhang, Xingliang; Fu, Dongjing (July 2024). "Exceptionally preserved radiodont arthropods from the lower Cambrian (Stage 3) Qingjiang Lagerstätte of Hubei, South China and the biogeographic and diversification patterns of radiodonts". Papers in Palaeontology. 10 (4). doi:10.1002/spp2.1583. ISSN 2056-2799.
  86. ^ ROLFE, W. D. I. 1962. Two new arthropod carapaces from the Burgess Shale (Middle Cambrian) of Canada. Breviora Museum of Comparative Zoology, 60: 1–9.
  87. ^ Conway Morris, S. (1978). "Laggania cambria Walcott: A Composite Fossil". Journal of Paleontology. 52 (1): 126–131. JSTOR 1303799.
  88. ^ Briggs, D. E. G. (1979). "Anomalocaris, the largest known Cambrian arthropod". Palaeontology. 22 (3): 631–664.
  89. ^ Daley, Allison; Budd, Graham; Caron, Jean-Bernard (1 October 2013). "The morphology and systematics of the anomalocarid Hurdia from the Middle Cambrian of British Columbia and Utah". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 11. doi:10.1080/14772019.2012.732723. S2CID 86465719.
  90. ^ Pates, Stephen; Daley, Allison C. (2019). "The Kinzers Formation (Pennsylvania, USA): the most diverse assemblage of Cambrian Stage 4 radiodonts". Geological Magazine. 156 (7): 1233–1246. Bibcode:2019GeoM..156.1233P. doi:10.1017/S0016756818000547. S2CID 134299859.
  91. ^ Paterson, John R.; Edgecombe, Gregory D.; García-Bellido, Diego C. (2020). "Disparate compound eyes of Cambrian radiodonts reveal their developmental growth mode and diverse visual ecology". Science Advances. 6 (49). Bibcode:2020SciA....6.6721P. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc6721. hdl:10141/622906. PMC 7821881. PMID 33268353.