Jump to content

Hudson Hawk: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 1228825299 by 143.44.144.247 (talk). unexplained. it's cited below.
See also 'Cultural references to Leonardo da Vinci
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 43: Line 43:
}}
}}


'''''Hudson Hawk''''' is a 1991 American [[action comedy film]] directed by [[Michael Lehmann]].<ref>{{cite news|title=Hudson Hawk |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |date=May 24, 1991|url= https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/movies/videos/hudsonhawkrhinson_a0a682.htm |access-date=October 28, 2010|archive-date=November 11, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121111141054/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/movies/videos/hudsonhawkrhinson_a0a682.htm |url-status=live}}</ref> [[Bruce Willis]] stars in the title role and also co-wrote both the story and the theme song.{{Citation needed|date=April 2021}} [[Danny Aiello]], [[Andie MacDowell]], [[James Coburn]], [[David Caruso]], [[Lorraine Toussaint]], [[Frank Stallone]], [[Sandra Bernhard]] and [[Richard E. Grant]] are also featured.<ref>{{cite news |title='Hawk' Better Fly|work=[[Chicago Tribune]] |date=June 2, 1991 |url=http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1991-06-02/features/9102190255_1_hudson-hawk-film-million-budget |access-date=October 29, 2010|archive-date=June 14, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120614034451/http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1991-06-02/features/9102190255_1_hudson-hawk-film-million-budget |url-status=live}}</ref>
'''''Hudson Hawk''''' is a 1991 American [[action comedy film]] directed by [[Michael Lehmann]].<ref>{{cite news|title=Hudson Hawk |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |date=May 24, 1991|url= https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/movies/videos/hudsonhawkrhinson_a0a682.htm |access-date=October 28, 2010|archive-date=November 11, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121111141054/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/movies/videos/hudsonhawkrhinson_a0a682.htm |url-status=live}}</ref> [[Bruce Willis]] stars in the title role and also co-wrote the story. [[Danny Aiello]], [[Andie MacDowell]], [[James Coburn]], [[David Caruso]], [[Lorraine Toussaint]], [[Frank Stallone]], [[Sandra Bernhard]], and [[Richard E. Grant]] are also featured.<ref>{{cite news |title='Hawk' Better Fly|work=[[Chicago Tribune]] |date=June 2, 1991 |url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/1991/05/19/real-hudson-hawk/ |access-date=October 29, 2010|archive-date=June 14, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120614034451/http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1991-06-02/features/9102190255_1_hudson-hawk-film-million-budget |url-status=live}}</ref>


The [[live action]] film employs [[Animated cartoon|cartoon]]-style [[slapstick]] heavily, including [[sound effect]]s, which enhances the film's signature [[surreal humor]]. The plot combines material based on [[Conspiracy theory|conspiracy theories]], [[Secret society|secret societies]], and historic mysteries, as well as outlandish "[[clockpunk]]" technology ''à la'' Coburn's ''[[Our Man Flint]]'' films of the 1960s.<ref>{{cite news |title=Real 'Hudson Hawk'|work=[[Chicago Tribune]]|date=May 19, 1991|url=http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1991-05-19/entertainment/9102140878_1_eddie-hawkins-hudson-river-film |access-date=October 29, 2010 |first=Glenn |last=Plaskin|archive-date=June 16, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120616052332/http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1991-05-19/entertainment/9102140878_1_eddie-hawkins-hudson-river-film |url-status=live}}</ref>
The [[live action]] film employs [[Animated cartoon|cartoon]]-style [[slapstick]] heavily, including [[sound effect]]s, which enhances the film's signature [[surreal humor]]. The plot combines material based on [[Conspiracy theory|conspiracy theories]], [[Secret society|secret societies]], and historic mysteries, as well as outlandish "[[clockpunk]]" technology ''à la'' Coburn's ''[[Our Man Flint]]'' films of the 1960s.<ref>{{cite news |title=Real 'Hudson Hawk'|work=[[Chicago Tribune]]|date=May 19, 1991|url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/1991/05/19/real-hudson-hawk/ |access-date=October 29, 2010 |first=Glenn |last=Plaskin|archive-date=June 16, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120616052332/http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1991-05-19/entertainment/9102140878_1_eddie-hawkins-hudson-river-film |url-status=live}}</ref>


A recurring plot device in the film has Hudson and his partner Tommy "Five-Tone" (Aiello) singing songs concurrently but separately, to time and synchronize their exploits. Willis-Aiello duets of [[Bing Crosby]]'s "[[Swinging on a Star]]" and [[Paul Anka]]'s "[[Side by Side (1927 song)|Side by Side]]" are featured on the film's soundtrack.
A recurring plot device in the film has Hudson and his partner Tommy "Five-Tone" (Aiello) singing songs concurrently but separately, to time and synchronize their exploits. Willis-Aiello duets of [[Bing Crosby]]'s "[[Swinging on a Star]]" and [[Paul Anka]]'s "[[Side by Side (1927 song)|Side by Side]]" are featured on the film's soundtrack.
Line 53: Line 53:
==Plot==
==Plot==
<!-- Per WP:FILMPLOT, plot summary should be between 400 to 700 words. -->
<!-- Per WP:FILMPLOT, plot summary should be between 400 to 700 words. -->
Eddie Hawkins—"Hudson Hawk" (from the bracing winds off the [[Hudson River|Hudson]])—is a master cat burglar and [[safe-cracking|safe-cracker]] with a penchant for using low-tech solutions against high-tech security systems and for conducting his robberies with precise, synchronized timing (later revealed to be a robust catalog of memorized music that he and his partner(s) sing along with during jobs).
Eddie Hawkins—"Hudson Hawk" (from the bracing winds off the [[Hudson River|Hudson]])—is a master cat burglar and [[Safe-cracking|safe-cracker]] with a penchant for using low-tech solutions against high-tech security systems and for conducting his robberies with precise, synchronized timing (later revealed to be a robust catalog of memorized music that he and his partner(s) sing along with during jobs).


Upon Hawk's release and on his first day of parole, he and his former partner, Tommy "Five-Tone" Messina, seek out a good cup of cappuccino. However, before Hawk can get it, he is [[blackmail]]ed by various entities. These include his parole officer, the minor Mario Brothers [[Italian-American Mafia|Mafia]] family, and the [[Central Intelligence Agency|CIA]], who push him into doing a few art heists.
Upon Hawk's release and his first day of parole, he and his former partner, Tommy "Five-Tone" Messina, seek out a good cup of cappuccino. However, before Hawk can get it, he is [[blackmail]]ed by various entities. These include his parole officer, the minor Mario Brothers [[Italian-American Mafia|Mafia]] family, and the [[Central Intelligence Agency|CIA]], who push him into doing a few art heists.


Hawk refuses each, despite mounting pressure and coercion, stating that his only real desires are to remain out of prison and enjoy a good cup of cappuccino -- though he is [[Running_gag|repeatedly interrupted before doing so]]. Hawk eventually relents and proceeds to [[Reconnaissance|case]] the art pieces.
Hawk refuses each, despite mounting pressure and coercion, stating that his only natural desires are to remain out of prison and enjoy a good cup of cappuccino—though he is [[Running gag|repeatedly interrupted before doing so]]. Hawk eventually relents and proceeds to [[Reconnaissance|case]] the art pieces.


Unbeknownst to Hawk, his blackmailers are all being manipulated by the American corporation, Mayflower Industries, run by husband-and-wife Darwin and Minerva Mayflower and their butler, Alfred. Headquartered in the [[Esposizione Universale Roma]], the company seeks to take over the world by building La Macchina dell'Oro, a machine invented by [[Leonardo da Vinci]] that [[alchemy|converts lead into gold]].
Unbeknownst to Hawk, his blackmailers are all manipulated by the American corporation Mayflower Industries, run by husband and wife Darwin and Minerva Mayflower and their butler Alfred. Headquartered in the [[Esposizione Universale Roma]], the company seeks to take over the world by building La Macchina dell'Oro, a machine invented by [[Leonardo da Vinci]] that [[Alchemy|converts lead into gold]].


An assembly of [[crystal]]s needed for the machine to function are hidden in a variety of Leonardo's artworks: the [[maquette]] of the [[Sforza]], the [[Codex Trivulzianus|Da Vinci Codex]], and a scale model of da Vinci's helicopter. Sister Anna Baragli is an operative for a secret [[Holy See|Vatican]] [[counter-espionage]] agency, working with the CIA to assist in Hawk's mission in Rome, though intending to foil the robbery at [[St. Peter's Basilica|St. Peter's]].
An assembly of [[crystal]]s needed for the machine to function is hidden in various of Leonardo's artworks: the [[maquette]] of the [[House of Sforza|Sforza]], the [[Codex Trivulzianus|Da Vinci Codex]], and a scale model of da Vinci's helicopter. Sister Anna Baragli is an operative for a secret [[Holy See|Vatican]] [[Counterintelligence|counter-espionage]] agency, working with the CIA to assist in Hawk's mission in Rome, intending to foil the robbery at [[St. Peter's Basilica|St. Peter's]].


After blowing up an auctioneer to cover up the theft of the Sforza, the Mario Bros. take Hawk away in an ambulance. He sticks syringes into Antony Mario's face, falls out of the ambulance on a gurney, and they try to run him down with the ambulance as they speed along the highway.
After blowing up an auctioneer to cover up the theft of the Sforza, the Mario Bros. take Hawk away in an ambulance. He sticks syringes into Antony Mario's face and falls out of the ambulance on a gurney, and they try to run him down with the ambulance as they speed along the highway.


The brothers are killed when their ambulance crashes. Immediately afterwards, Hawk meets [[CIA]] head George Kaplan and candy-bar themed codenamed agents—Snickers, Kit Kat, Almond Joy, and Butterfinger—who take him to the Mayflowers.
The brothers get killed when their ambulance crashes. Immediately afterward, Hawk meets [[Central Intelligence Agency|CIA]] head George Kaplan and four codenamed agents (Snickers, Kit Kat, Almond Joy, and Butterfinger) who take him to the Mayflowers.


Hawk successfully steals the Da Vinci Codex from another museum, but later refuses to steal the helicopter design. Tommy Five-Tone fakes his death so they can escape. They are discovered and attacked by the CIA agents; Kaplan reveals that he and his agents stole the piece but, unlike them, had no problem killing the guards. Hawk and Tommy escape when Snickers and Almond Joy are killed, and pursue the remaining agents. Kit Kat and Butterfinger take Anna to the castle where the Macchina dell'Oro is being reconstructed.
Hawk successfully steals the Da Vinci Codex from another museum, but later refuses to steal the helicopter design. Tommy Five-Tone fakes his death so they can escape. They are discovered and attacked by the CIA agents; Kaplan reveals that he and his agents stole the piece but, unlike them, had no problem killing the guards. Hawk and Tommy escape when Snickers and Almond Joy are killed and pursue the remaining agents. Kit Kat and Butterfinger take Anna to the castle where the Macchina dell'Oro is reconstructed.


The showdown is in the castle between the remaining CIA agents, the Mayflowers, and the team of Hudson, Five-Tone, and Baragli. Kit Kat and Butterfinger are killed by Minerva, although Kit Kat frees Baragli before dying. Tommy fights Darwin and Alfred inside the speeding limo, and Hudson fights George Kaplan on the roof of the castle. Kaplan topples from the castle, landing on the limo. Alfred plants a bomb in it, escaping with Darwin; Tommy is trapped inside while Kaplan is hanging onto the hood. The bomb detonates as the limo speeds over a cliff.
The showdown is in the castle between the remaining CIA agents, the Mayflowers, and the team of Hudson, Five-Tone, and Baragli. Minerva kills Kit Kat and Butterfinger, although Kit Kat frees Baragli before dying. Tommy fights Darwin and Alfred inside a speeding limousine, and Hudson fights George Kaplan on the castle's roof. Kaplan topples from the castle, landing on the limousine. Alfred plants a bomb in it, escaping with Darwin; Tommy gets trapped inside while Kaplan is hanging onto the hood. The bomb detonates as the limousine speeds over a cliff.


Darwin and Minerva force Hawk to put together the crystal powering the machine, but he intentionally leaves out one small piece. When the machine is activated, it malfunctions and explodes, killing the Mayflowers. Hawk battles Alfred, using his own blades to decapitate him.
Darwin and Minerva force Hawk to assemble the crystal powering the machine, but he intentionally leaves out one small piece. When the machine is activated, it malfunctions and explodes, killing the Mayflowers. Hawk battles Alfred, using his blades to decapitate him.


Hawk and Baragli escape the castle, using the da Vinci flying machine, discovering Tommy waiting for them at a cafe, having miraculously escaped death through a combination of airbags and a sprinkler system in the limo. With the world saved and da Vinci's secrets protected, Hawk finally gets to enjoy a cappuccino.
Hawk and Baragli escape the castle using the da Vinci flying machine. They discover Tommy waiting for them at a café, having miraculously escaped death through a combination of airbags and a sprinkler system in the limo. With the world saved and da Vinci's secrets protected, Hawk finally enjoys a cappuccino.


==Cast==
==Cast==
Line 93: Line 93:
* [[Doug and Steve Martin|Steven M. Martin]] as Ook
* [[Doug and Steve Martin|Steven M. Martin]] as Ook
* [[Leonardo Cimino]] as The Cardinal
* [[Leonardo Cimino]] as The Cardinal
* [[Enrico Verso]] as The Apprentice
* [[Enrico Lo Verso]] as The Apprentice
* [[Courtenay Semel]] as Bratty Girl In Museum
* [[Courtenay Semel]] as Bratty Girl In Museum
* [[Frank Welker]] as Bunny The Dog
* [[Frank Welker]] as Bunny The Dog
Line 99: Line 99:
* Stefano Molinari as [[Leonardo da Vinci]]
* Stefano Molinari as [[Leonardo da Vinci]]
}}
}}

==Production==
Before [[Bruce Willis]] became a full-time actor, he had worked at a bar in [[New York City]]. One of the regulars at the bar was Robert Kraft, who worked with Willis on putting a song together called "''The Hudson Hawk''", with Kraft being inspired by a strong wind that blew from the Hudson River across [[Manhattan]] in the fall. Eventually, when Willis became a star, he went back to the idea of doing a super sleuth film, one that Kraft thought could be "the anti-James Bond" with potential for follow-up films. [[Joel Silver]], who had produced Willis with the first two ''[[Die Hard]]'' films, jumped on producing this film. [[Maruschka Detmers]] was originally cast opposite Willis but suffered a back injury and had to depart the role, which saw [[Andie MacDowell]] cast.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Brew |first=Simon |date=2013-03-20 |title=Looking back at Hudson Hawk |url=https://www.denofgeek.com/movies/looking-back-at-hudson-hawk/ |access-date=2024-08-31 |website=[[Den of Geek]] |language=en-US}}</ref> [[Michael Lehmann]], director of films such as ''[[Heathers]]'' (which had been written by [[Daniel Waters (screenwriter)|Daniel Waters]], who was hired to co-write the screenplay), envisioned [[Richard E. Grant]] and [[Sandra Bernhard]] as playing manic villains, with one basis of inspiration being Silver. The budget reportedly went from $42 million to around $70 million to go with constant on-set rewriting and rumors of turbulence with producer-star Willis; it was shot in [[Italy]], [[England]], and [[Hungary]]. Grant, who spent four months on the production, wrote about his experiences making the films in his book ''With Nails'', listing various stories such as Willis continuously watching his close-ups on the video replay monitors on takes to go with co-star [[Danny Aiello]] wanting re-writes for the climax.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2017-06-24 |title=RICHARD E. GRANT: THE 1991 INTERVIEW |url=https://multiglom.com/2017/06/24/richard-e-grant-the-1991-interview/ |access-date=2024-08-31 |website=MULTIGLOM |language=en-GB}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Searby |first=Mark |date=2022-02-08 |title=Resurrecting the hawk: Hudson Hawk, over 30 years later |url=https://filmstories.co.uk/features/resurrecting-the-hawk-hudson-hawk-over-30-years-later/ |access-date=2024-08-31 |website=Film Stories |language=en-GB}}</ref>


==Soundtrack==
==Soundtrack==
Line 105: Line 108:


# "Hudson Hawk Theme" - [[Dr. John]] (05:38)
# "Hudson Hawk Theme" - [[Dr. John]] (05:38)
# "[[Swinging on a Star]]" - [[Bruce Willis]] and [[Danny Aiello]] (02:53) - Sung in incorrect order of verses (the plot device in the movie refers to the original track length as 5:32)
# "[[Swinging on a Star]]" - [[Bruce Willis]] and [[Danny Aiello]] (02:53) - Sung in incorrect order of verses (the [[plot device]] in the movie refers to the original track length as 5:32)
# "[[Side by Side (1927 song)|Side by Side]]" - Bruce Willis and Danny Aiello (02:18) (the plot device in the film refers to the original track length as 6:00)
# "[[Side by Side (1927 song)|Side by Side]]" - Bruce Willis and Danny Aiello (02:18) (the plot device in the film refers to the original track length as 6:00)
# "Leonardo" (04:55)
# "Leonardo" (04:55)
Line 121: Line 124:
On [[Rotten Tomatoes]], the film has a rating of 31% based on 45 reviews, with an average rating of 4.6 out of 10. The site's critics consensus: "''Hudson Hawk'''s kitchen-sink approach to its blend of action and slapstick results in a surreal, baffling misfire."<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/hudson_hawk/ |title= Hudson Hawk |website= Rotten Tomatoes |access-date= March 1, 2023 |archive-date= May 30, 2016 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160530043251/http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/hudson_hawk/ |url-status= live }}</ref> On [[Metacritic]], the film has a weighted average score of 17 out of 100, based on 15 critics, indicating "overwhelming dislike".<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.metacritic.com/movie/hudson-hawk |title= Hudson Hawk |website= Metacritic |access-date= August 30, 2016 |archive-date= May 17, 2016 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160517131134/http://www.metacritic.com/movie/hudson-hawk |url-status= live }}</ref> Audiences polled by [[CinemaScore]] gave the film an average grade of "C+" on an A+ to F scale.<ref name="CinemaScore">{{cite web |url= https://www.cinemascore.com/publicsearch/index/title/ |title= Cinemascore |url-status= dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20181220122629/https://www.cinemascore.com/publicsearch/index/title/ |archive-date= December 20, 2018 |access-date= August 30, 2019 }}</ref>
On [[Rotten Tomatoes]], the film has a rating of 31% based on 45 reviews, with an average rating of 4.6 out of 10. The site's critics consensus: "''Hudson Hawk'''s kitchen-sink approach to its blend of action and slapstick results in a surreal, baffling misfire."<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/hudson_hawk/ |title= Hudson Hawk |website= Rotten Tomatoes |access-date= March 1, 2023 |archive-date= May 30, 2016 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160530043251/http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/hudson_hawk/ |url-status= live }}</ref> On [[Metacritic]], the film has a weighted average score of 17 out of 100, based on 15 critics, indicating "overwhelming dislike".<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.metacritic.com/movie/hudson-hawk |title= Hudson Hawk |website= Metacritic |access-date= August 30, 2016 |archive-date= May 17, 2016 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160517131134/http://www.metacritic.com/movie/hudson-hawk |url-status= live }}</ref> Audiences polled by [[CinemaScore]] gave the film an average grade of "C+" on an A+ to F scale.<ref name="CinemaScore">{{cite web |url= https://www.cinemascore.com/publicsearch/index/title/ |title= Cinemascore |url-status= dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20181220122629/https://www.cinemascore.com/publicsearch/index/title/ |archive-date= December 20, 2018 |access-date= August 30, 2019 }}</ref>


In the ''[[Chicago Tribune]]'', Terry Clifford observed that: "The end result is being thrown up on ''selected'' screens this weekend, and the suspicion that this was a pooch turns out to be undeniably correct. Boring and banal, overwrought and undercooked, ''Hudson Hawk'' is beyond bad."<ref>{{cite news|title=Smug 'Hudson Hawk' Looks Like A Turkey|work=Chicago Tribune|date=May 24, 1991|url=http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1991-05-24/entertainment/9102160454_1_hudson-hawk-eddie-hawkins-heathers|access-date=October 29, 2010|first=Clifford|last=Terry|archive-date=June 10, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150610201337/http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1991-05-24/entertainment/9102160454_1_hudson-hawk-eddie-hawkins-heathers|url-status=live}}</ref>
In the ''[[Chicago Tribune]]'', Terry Clifford observed that: "The end result is being thrown up on ''selected'' screens this weekend, and the suspicion that this was a pooch turns out to be undeniably correct. Boring and banal, overwrought and undercooked, ''Hudson Hawk'' is beyond bad."<ref>{{cite news|title=Smug 'Hudson Hawk' Looks Like A Turkey|work=Chicago Tribune|date=May 24, 1991|url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/1991/05/24/smug-hudson-hawk-looks-like-a-turkey/|access-date=October 29, 2010|first=Clifford|last=Terry|archive-date=June 10, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150610201337/http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1991-05-24/entertainment/9102160454_1_hudson-hawk-eddie-hawkins-heathers|url-status=live}}</ref>


As [[Kenneth Turan]] wrote in the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'':
As [[Kenneth Turan]] wrote in the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'':
{{cquote|The saddest thing about ''Hudson Hawk'' is that director Lehmann and co-screenwriter Waters were previously responsible for the clever, audacious ''[[Heathers]]'', a film that represented all that is most promising about American film, while this one represents all that is most moribund and retrograde. Perhaps they both earned enough money here so that they won't be tempted to indulge themselves in similar big-budget fiascoes. Here's hoping.<ref>{{cite news |title= Bruce Willis' 'Hudson Hawk' Fails to Fly as Comedy Caper |work= [[Los Angeles Times]] |date= 1991-05-24 |url= http://articles.latimes.com/1991-05-24/entertainment/ca-2308_1_hudson-hawk |access-date= 2010-10-28 |first= Kenneth |last= Turan |archive-date= 2012-11-03 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20121103073250/http://articles.latimes.com/1991-05-24/entertainment/ca-2308_1_hudson-hawk |url-status= live }}</ref>|}}
{{cquote|The saddest thing about ''Hudson Hawk'' is that director Lehmann and co-screenwriter Waters were previously responsible for the clever, audacious ''[[Heathers]]'', a film that represented all that is most promising about American film, while this one represents all that is most moribund and retrograde. Perhaps they both earned enough money here so that they won't be tempted to indulge themselves in similar big-budget fiascoes. Here's hoping.<ref>{{cite news |title= Bruce Willis' 'Hudson Hawk' Fails to Fly as Comedy Caper |work= [[Los Angeles Times]] |date= 1991-05-24 |url= https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1991-05-24-ca-2308-story.html |access-date= 2010-10-28 |first= Kenneth |last= Turan |archive-date= 2012-11-03 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20121103073250/http://articles.latimes.com/1991-05-24/entertainment/ca-2308_1_hudson-hawk |url-status= live }}</ref>|}}


[[Roger Ebert]] and [[Gene Siskel]] gave the film a "two thumbs down" review on their ''At the Movies'' TV show. Ebert described the film as a complete disaster: "every line starts from zero and gets nowhere". Siskel's review was marginally more positive, saying that Willis had a few funny moments and furthermore that the film might have been salvaged if Willis and Aiello had been the only zany characters against a cast of [[Straight man|straight men]], as opposed to a cast full of [[overacting]], where everyone tried too hard to make each line funny.<ref>{{cite AV media | url = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nq0r-t-xljM | title = Siskel and Ebert review Hudson Hawk | via = [[YouTube]] }}</ref>
[[Roger Ebert]] and [[Gene Siskel]] gave the film a "two thumbs down" review on their ''At the Movies'' TV show. Ebert described the film as a complete disaster: "every line starts from zero and gets nowhere". Siskel's review was marginally more positive, saying that Willis had a few funny moments and furthermore that the film might have been salvaged if Willis and Aiello had been the only zany characters against a cast of [[Straight man|straight men]], as opposed to a cast full of [[overacting]], where everyone tried too hard to make each line funny.<ref>{{cite AV media | url = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nq0r-t-xljM | title = Siskel and Ebert review Hudson Hawk | via = [[YouTube]] }}</ref>


''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]'' called the film "a relentlessly annoying clay duck that crash-lands in a sea of wretched excess and silliness. Those willing to check their brains at the door may find sparse amusement."<ref>{{cite web |url= https://variety.com/1990/film/reviews/hudson-hawk-1200428876/ |title= Hudson Hawk |website= Variety.com |date= December 31, 1990 |access-date= December 11, 2017 |archive-date= August 9, 2017 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20170809042234/http://variety.com/1990/film/reviews/hudson-hawk-1200428876/ |url-status= live }}</ref> [[Peter Travers]] of ''[[Rolling Stone]]'' said of the film: "A movie this unspeakably awful can make an audience a little crazy. You want to throw things, yell at the actors, beg them to stop."<ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/movie/5948221/review/5948222/hudson_hawk |magazine=[[Rolling Stone]] |title=Hudson Hawk |first=Peter |last=Travers |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080616083946/http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/movie/5948221/review/5948222/hudson_hawk |archive-date=June 16, 2008 |url-status=dead }}</ref> James Brundage of ''AMC filmcritic'' said the film was "so implausible and so over the top that it lets inconsistency roll off like water on a duck's back."<ref>{{cite web|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071106060928/http://www.filmcritic.com/misc/emporium.nsf/reviews/Hudson-Hawk |archive-date=November 6, 2007 |url=http://www.filmcritic.com/misc/emporium.nsf/reviews/Hudson-Hawk |website=Filmcritic |title=Hudson Hawk |first=James |last=Brundage |url-status=dead }}</ref> [[Janet Maslin]] in the ''[[New York Times]]'' called the film "a colossally sour and ill-conceived misfire" and denounced the film for "smirky, mean-spirited cynicism."<ref>{{cite news |url= https://www.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9D0CE2DD173BF937A15756C0A967958260 |title= Review/Film Bruce Willis as a Hip Cat Burglar |first= Janet |last= Maslin |author-link=Janet Masking |newspaper= [[The New York Times]] |date= May 24, 1991 |access-date= August 30, 2016 |archive-date= September 13, 2016 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160913222440/http://www.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9D0CE2DD173BF937A15756C0A967958260 |url-status= live }}</ref> Writing in ''[[The Washington Post]]'', Joe Brown said: "To say this megamillion Bruce Willis vehicle doesn't fly is understatement in the extreme... ''Hudson Hawk'' offers a klutzy, charmless hero, and wallows dully in limp slapstick and lowest common denominator crudeness."<ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/movies/videos/hudsonhawkrbrown_a0adc7.htm |title= Hudson Hawk |first= Joe |last= Brown |newspaper= Washington Post |date= May 24, 1991 |access-date= August 30, 2016 |archive-date= March 4, 2016 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160304035613/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/movies/videos/hudsonhawkrbrown_a0adc7.htm |url-status= live }}</ref> Chris Hicks wrote in the ''[[Salt Lake City]] [[Deseret News]]'': "What is most amazing is the pervasive silliness that has the cast acting like fools without ever getting a laugh from the audience. It's hard to imagine a major, big-budget movie that could come along this year and be worse than ''Hudson Hawk'', a solid contender for the longest 95 minutes in movie history.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700000828/Hudson-Hawk.html |title= Film review: Hudson Hawk |first= Chris |last= Hicks |newspaper= [[Deseret News]] |date= May 27, 1991 |access-date= August 30, 2016 |archive-date= October 7, 2016 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20161007092204/http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700000828/Hudson-Hawk.html |url-status= live }}</ref> [[Owen Gleiberman]] in ''[[Entertainment Weekly]]'' called the film "a fiasco sealed with a smirk."<ref>{{cite magazine |url= http://www.ew.com/article/1991/05/31/hudson-hawk |title= Hudson Hawk |magazine= Entertainment Weekly |date= May 31, 1991 |access-date= August 30, 2016 |archive-date= June 6, 2016 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160606010703/http://www.ew.com/article/1991/05/31/hudson-hawk |url-status= live }}</ref>
''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]'' called the film "a relentlessly annoying clay duck that crash-lands in a sea of wretched excess and silliness. Those willing to check their brains at the door may find sparse amusement."<ref>{{cite web |url= https://variety.com/1990/film/reviews/hudson-hawk-1200428876/ |title= Hudson Hawk |website= Variety.com |date= December 31, 1990 |access-date= December 11, 2017 |archive-date= August 9, 2017 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20170809042234/http://variety.com/1990/film/reviews/hudson-hawk-1200428876/ |url-status= live }}</ref> [[Peter Travers]] of ''[[Rolling Stone]]'' said of the film: "A movie this unspeakably awful can make an audience a little crazy. You want to throw things, yell at the actors, beg them to stop."<ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/movie/5948221/review/5948222/hudson_hawk |magazine=[[Rolling Stone]] |title=Hudson Hawk |first=Peter |last=Travers |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080616083946/http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/movie/5948221/review/5948222/hudson_hawk |archive-date=June 16, 2008 |url-status=dead }}</ref> James Brundage of ''AMC filmcritic'' said the film was "so implausible and so over the top that it lets inconsistency roll off like water on a duck's back."<ref>{{cite web|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071106060928/http://www.filmcritic.com/misc/emporium.nsf/reviews/Hudson-Hawk |archive-date=November 6, 2007 |url=http://www.filmcritic.com/misc/emporium.nsf/reviews/Hudson-Hawk |website=Filmcritic |title=Hudson Hawk |first=James |last=Brundage |url-status=dead }}</ref> [[Janet Maslin]] in the ''[[New York Times]]'' called the film "a colossally sour and ill-conceived misfire" and denounced the film for "smirky, mean-spirited cynicism."<ref>{{cite news |url= https://www.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9D0CE2DD173BF937A15756C0A967958260 |title= Review/Film Bruce Willis as a Hip Cat Burglar |first= Janet |last= Maslin |author-link=Janet Masking |newspaper= [[The New York Times]] |date= May 24, 1991 |access-date= August 30, 2016 |archive-date= September 13, 2016 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160913222440/http://www.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9D0CE2DD173BF937A15756C0A967958260 |url-status= live }}</ref> Writing in ''[[The Washington Post]]'', Joe Brown said: "To say this megamillion Bruce Willis vehicle doesn't fly is understatement in the extreme... ''Hudson Hawk'' offers a klutzy, charmless hero, and wallows dully in limp slapstick and lowest common denominator crudeness."<ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/movies/videos/hudsonhawkrbrown_a0adc7.htm |title= Hudson Hawk |first= Joe |last= Brown |newspaper= Washington Post |date= May 24, 1991 |access-date= August 30, 2016 |archive-date= March 4, 2016 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160304035613/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/movies/videos/hudsonhawkrbrown_a0adc7.htm |url-status= live }}</ref> Chris Hicks wrote in the ''[[Salt Lake City]] [[Deseret News]]'': "What is most amazing is the pervasive silliness that has the cast acting like fools without ever getting a laugh from the audience. It's hard to imagine a major, big-budget movie that could come along this year and be worse than ''Hudson Hawk'', a solid contender for the longest 95 minutes in movie history.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700000828/Hudson-Hawk.html |title= Film review: Hudson Hawk |first= Chris |last= Hicks |newspaper= [[Deseret News]] |date= May 27, 1991 |access-date= August 30, 2016 |archive-date= October 7, 2016 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20161007092204/http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700000828/Hudson-Hawk.html |url-status= dead }}</ref> [[Owen Gleiberman]] in ''[[Entertainment Weekly]]'' called the film "a fiasco sealed with a smirk."<ref>{{cite magazine |url= http://www.ew.com/article/1991/05/31/hudson-hawk |title= Hudson Hawk |magazine= Entertainment Weekly |date= May 31, 1991 |access-date= August 30, 2016 |archive-date= June 6, 2016 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160606010703/http://www.ew.com/article/1991/05/31/hudson-hawk |url-status= live }}</ref>


Jo Berry from ''[[Empire (film magazine)|Empire]]'' gave it three out of five stars, noting that it "reached UK screens with the added burden of having been slaughtered by US critics who likened it to famous big budget turkeys like ''[[Raise The Titanic (film)|Raise The Titanic]]'' and ''[[Ishtar (film)|Ishtar]]''. True, the film has its flaws, but the positives do outweigh the negatives, with Bruce Willis at his wisecracking best in the title role."<ref>{{cite magazine |url= https://www.empireonline.com/movies/reviews/hudson-hawk-review/ |title= Hudson Hawk Review |magazine= [[Empire (film magazine)|Empire]] |date= July 1991 |access-date= January 1, 2020 |archive-date= January 12, 2020 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20200112121720/https://www.empireonline.com/movies/reviews/hudson-hawk-review/ |url-status= live }}</ref>
Jo Berry from ''[[Empire (film magazine)|Empire]]'' gave it three out of five stars, noting that it "reached UK screens with the added burden of having been slaughtered by US critics who likened it to famous big budget turkeys like ''[[Raise The Titanic (film)|Raise The Titanic]]'' and ''[[Ishtar (film)|Ishtar]]''. True, the film has its flaws, but the positives do outweigh the negatives, with Bruce Willis at his wisecracking best in the title role."<ref>{{cite magazine |url= https://www.empireonline.com/movies/reviews/hudson-hawk-review/ |title= Hudson Hawk Review |magazine= [[Empire (film magazine)|Empire]] |date= July 1991 |access-date= January 1, 2020 |archive-date= January 12, 2020 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20200112121720/https://www.empireonline.com/movies/reviews/hudson-hawk-review/ |url-status= live }}</ref>


Jane Lamacraft reassessed the film as one of the "Forgotten Pleasures of the Multiplex" for ''[[Sight & Sound]]'''s June 2011 magazine.{{citation needed|date=June 2022}}
Jane Lamacraft reassessed the film as one of the "Forgotten Pleasures of the Multiplex" for ''[[Sight & Sound]]'''s June 2011 magazine.{{citation needed|date=June 2022}}

In his autobiography, ''With Nails'', [[Richard E. Grant]] diarises the production of the film in detail, noting the [[ad hoc]] nature of the production and extensive rewriting and replotting during the actual filming.{{citation needed|date=June 2022}} Willis went on to become one of the leading box-office stars of the 1990s, but has not made any further forays into screenwriting.{{citation needed|date=June 2022}}


===Box office===
===Box office===
The film performed poorly in the United States, partly because the film was intended as an absurd comedy, yet was marketed as an action film one year after the success of ''[[Die Hard 2]]''.<ref>{{cite news|title=No Blockbusters Among This Crop of Memorial Day Movies|newspaper=[[The Los Angeles Times]]|date=May 28, 1991|url=http://articles.latimes.com/1991-05-28/entertainment/ca-2601_1_memorial-day|access-date=December 20, 2010|first=David J.|last=Fox|archive-date=November 4, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121104104534/http://articles.latimes.com/1991-05-28/entertainment/ca-2601_1_memorial-day|url-status=live}}</ref> It grossed only $17 million in the United States and Canada.<ref name="boxofficemojo.com">{{cite web|work=[[Box Office Mojo]]|title=Hudson Hawk |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=hudsonhawk.htm |access-date=August 3, 2009|archive-date=June 30, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090630143400/http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=hudsonhawk.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> Internationally, it performed much better, grossing $80 million<ref>{{cite magazine|magazine=[[Daily Variety]]|page=2|date=October 24, 1991|last=Archerd|first=Army|author-link=Army Archerd|title=Just For Variety}}</ref> for a worldwide total of $97 million. By the end of its theatrical run, the film had lost the studio an estimated $90 million.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://theguardian.com/film/2021/may/14/hudson-hawk-bruce-willis-hear-me-out |title=Hear me out: why Hudson Hawk isn't a bad movie &#124; Movies |work=The Guardian |date=May 14, 2021 |access-date=2022-05-16}}</ref>
The film performed poorly in the United States, partly because the film was intended as an absurd comedy, yet was marketed as an action film one year after the success of ''[[Die Hard 2]]''.<ref>{{cite news|title=No Blockbusters Among This Crop of Memorial Day Movies|newspaper=[[The Los Angeles Times]]|date=May 28, 1991|url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1991-05-28-ca-2601-story.html|access-date=December 20, 2010|first=David J.|last=Fox|archive-date=November 4, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121104104534/http://articles.latimes.com/1991-05-28/entertainment/ca-2601_1_memorial-day|url-status=live}}</ref> It grossed only $17 million in the United States and Canada.<ref name="boxofficemojo.com">{{cite web|work=[[Box Office Mojo]]|title=Hudson Hawk |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=hudsonhawk.htm |access-date=August 3, 2009|archive-date=June 30, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090630143400/http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=hudsonhawk.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> Internationally, it performed much better, grossing $80 million<ref>{{cite magazine|magazine=[[Daily Variety]]|page=2|date=October 24, 1991|last=Archerd|first=Army|author-link=Army Archerd|title=Just For Variety}}</ref> for a worldwide total of $97 million. By the end of its theatrical run, the film had lost the studio an estimated $90 million.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://theguardian.com/film/2021/may/14/hudson-hawk-bruce-willis-hear-me-out |title=Hear me out: why Hudson Hawk isn't a bad movie &#124; Movies |work=The Guardian |date=May 14, 2021 |access-date=2022-05-16}}</ref>


The film performed well on home video<ref name=video/> and by 1995 started to pay out to profit participants, including Bruce Willis.<ref>{{cite magazine|magazine=[[Daily Variety]]|page=2|date=October 19, 1995|last=Archerd|first=Army|author-link=Army Archerd|title=Just For Variety}}</ref>
The film performed well on home video<ref name=video/> and by 1995 started to pay out to profit participants, including Bruce Willis.<ref>{{cite magazine|magazine=[[Daily Variety]]|page=2|date=October 19, 1995|last=Archerd|first=Army|author-link=Army Archerd|title=Just For Variety}}</ref>


===Accolades===
===Accolades===
It received three [[1991 Golden Raspberry Awards]] for [[Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Director|Director]] (Lehmann), [[Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screenplay|Screenplay]] and [[Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Picture|Picture]] with additional nominations for [[Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actor|Actor]] (Willis), [[Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actor|Supporting Actor]] (Grant) and [[Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actress|Supporting Actress]] (Bernhard). It was also nominated for Worst Picture at the 1991 [[Stinkers Bad Movie Awards]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Past Winners Database |url=http://theenvelope.latimes.com/extras/lostmind/year/1991/1991st.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070106124822/http://theenvelope.latimes.com/extras/lostmind/year/1991/1991st.htm |url-status=dead |archive-date=January 6, 2007 |website=The Envelope at LA Times |access-date=September 25, 2019}}</ref>
It received three [[1991 Golden Raspberry Awards]] for [[Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Director|Director]] (Lehmann), [[Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screenplay|Screenplay]] and [[Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Picture|Picture]] with additional nominations for [[Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actor|Actor]] (Willis), [[Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actor|Supporting Actor]] (Grant), and [[Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actress|Supporting Actress]] (Bernhard). It was also nominated for Worst Picture at the 1991 [[Stinkers Bad Movie Awards]], losing to ''[[Nothing but Trouble (1991 film)|Nothing but Trouble]]''.<ref>{{cite web |title=Past Winners Database |url=http://theenvelope.latimes.com/extras/lostmind/year/1991/1991st.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070106124822/http://theenvelope.latimes.com/extras/lostmind/year/1991/1991st.htm |url-status=dead |archive-date=January 6, 2007 |website=The Envelope at LA Times |access-date=September 25, 2019}}</ref>


==Home media==
==Home media==
The film was released on [[VHS]] and [[LaserDisc]] in late 1991. Upon its home video release, the tagline "Catch the Excitement, Catch the Adventure, Catch the Hawk" was changed to "Catch the Adventure, Catch The Laughter, Catch the Hawk".<ref>{{cite news|title='Backdraft' Burns 'Hawk's' Wings at the Box Office|work=[[The Los Angeles Times]]|date=May 29, 1991|url=http://articles.latimes.com/1991-05-29/entertainment/ca-2570_1_box-office|access-date=October 3, 2010|first=David J.|last=Fox|archive-date=November 2, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121102183603/http://articles.latimes.com/1991-05-29/entertainment/ca-2570_1_box-office|url-status=live}}</ref> Despite the film's failure at the US box office, the film was successful on home video.<ref name=video>{{cite magazine|magazine=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]|date=January 6, 1992|page=5|title='Terminator 2' Takes Ring In $200 Million Year|last=Putzer|first=Gerald}}</ref>
The film was released on [[VHS]] and [[LaserDisc]] in late 1991. Upon its home video release, the tagline "Catch the Excitement, Catch the Adventure, Catch the Hawk" was changed to "Catch the Adventure, Catch The Laughter, Catch the Hawk".<ref>{{cite news|title='Backdraft' Burns 'Hawk's' Wings at the Box Office|work=[[The Los Angeles Times]]|date=May 29, 1991|url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1991-05-29-ca-2570-story.html|access-date=October 3, 2010|first=David J.|last=Fox|archive-date=November 2, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121102183603/http://articles.latimes.com/1991-05-29/entertainment/ca-2570_1_box-office|url-status=live}}</ref> Despite the film's failure at the US box office, the film was successful on home video.<ref name=video>{{cite magazine|magazine=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]|date=January 6, 1992|page=5|title='Terminator 2' Takes Ring In $200 Million Year|last=Putzer|first=Gerald}}</ref>


It was released twice on [[DVD]], first in 1999 and again in 2007 with new extras. In 2013, Mill Creek Entertainment released ''Hudson Hawk'' on [[Blu-ray]] for the first time; it was included in a set with ''[[Hollywood Homicide]]''. All extras were dropped for the latter release.<ref>{{cite web| url= http://www.millcreekent.com/hollywood-homicide-hudson-hawk-bd-double-feature.html| title= Double Feature - Blu-ray: Hollywood Homicide, Hudson Hawk| website= millcreekent.com| publisher= Mill Creek Entertainment| access-date= August 8, 2017| archive-date= July 14, 2017| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20170714102235/http://www.millcreekent.com/hollywood-homicide-hudson-hawk-bd-double-feature.html| url-status= live}}</ref>
It was released twice on [[DVD]], first in 1999 and again in 2007 with new extras. In 2013, Mill Creek Entertainment released ''Hudson Hawk'' on [[Blu-ray]] for the first time; it was included in a set with ''[[Hollywood Homicide]]''. All extras were dropped for the latter release.<ref>{{cite web| url= http://www.millcreekent.com/hollywood-homicide-hudson-hawk-bd-double-feature.html| title= Double Feature - Blu-ray: Hollywood Homicide, Hudson Hawk| website= millcreekent.com| publisher= Mill Creek Entertainment| access-date= August 8, 2017| archive-date= July 14, 2017| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20170714102235/http://www.millcreekent.com/hollywood-homicide-hudson-hawk-bd-double-feature.html| url-status= live}}</ref>


==Video game==
==Video game==
A video game based on the film was released in 1991 under the title ''[[Hudson Hawk (video game)|Hudson Hawk]]'' for various home computers and game consoles. [[Sony Imagesoft]] released versions of the game for the [[Nintendo Entertainment System|NES]] and [[Game Boy]], while [[Ocean Software]] released it for the [[Commodore 64]], [[Amiga]], [[ZX Spectrum]], [[Amstrad CPC]] and [[Atari ST]]. It is a side-scrolling game where the player, as the Hawk, must steal the [[Sforza]] and the [[Codex]] from the auction house and the Vatican, respectively. Then Castle Da Vinci has to be infiltrated in order to steal the mirrored crystal needed to power the gold machine. On his journey, Hawk must face many oddball adversaries, including dachshunds that try to throw him off the roof of the auction house, janitors, photographers, killer nuns and a tennis player (presumably Darwin Mayflower).
A video game based on the film was released in 1991 under the title ''[[Hudson Hawk (video game)|Hudson Hawk]]'' for various home computers and game consoles. [[Sony Imagesoft]] released versions of the game for the [[Nintendo Entertainment System|NES]] and [[Game Boy]], while [[Ocean Software]] released it for the [[Commodore 64]], [[Amiga]], [[ZX Spectrum]], [[Amstrad CPC]], and [[Atari ST]]. It is a side-scrolling game where the player, as the Hawk, must steal the [[Sforza]] and the [[Codex]] from the auction house and the Vatican, respectively. Then, Castle Da Vinci has to be infiltrated in order to steal the mirrored crystal needed to power the gold machine. On his journey, Hawk must face many oddball adversaries, including dachshunds that try to throw him off the roof of the auction house, janitors, photographers, killer nuns and a tennis player (presumably Darwin Mayflower).

==See also==
* [[Cultural references to Leonardo da Vinci]]


==References==
==References==
Line 157: Line 161:
==External links==
==External links==
* {{IMDb title|0102070}}
* {{IMDb title|0102070}}
* {{Amg title|23773}}
* {{AllMovie title|23773}}


{{S-start}} {{S-ach|aw}}
{{S-start}} {{S-ach|aw}}
Line 197: Line 201:
[[Category:Films scored by Michael Kamen]]
[[Category:Films scored by Michael Kamen]]
[[Category:Films with screenplays by Steven E. de Souza]]
[[Category:Films with screenplays by Steven E. de Souza]]
[[Category:Golden Raspberry Award winning films]]
[[Category:Golden Raspberry Award–winning films]]
[[Category:Films with screenplays by Daniel Waters (screenwriter)]]
[[Category:Films with screenplays by Daniel Waters (screenwriter)]]
[[Category:1990s American films]]
[[Category:1990s American films]]
[[Category:English-language crime comedy films]]
[[Category:English-language action comedy films]]

Latest revision as of 16:52, 20 November 2024

Hudson Hawk
Theatrical release poster
Directed byMichael Lehmann
Screenplay by
Story by
Produced byJoel Silver
Starring
CinematographyDante Spinotti
Edited by
Music by
Production
company
Distributed byTri-Star Pictures
Release date
  • May 24, 1991 (1991-05-24)
Running time
100 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Budget$65 million[1]
Box office$97 million

Hudson Hawk is a 1991 American action comedy film directed by Michael Lehmann.[2] Bruce Willis stars in the title role and also co-wrote the story. Danny Aiello, Andie MacDowell, James Coburn, David Caruso, Lorraine Toussaint, Frank Stallone, Sandra Bernhard, and Richard E. Grant are also featured.[3]

The live action film employs cartoon-style slapstick heavily, including sound effects, which enhances the film's signature surreal humor. The plot combines material based on conspiracy theories, secret societies, and historic mysteries, as well as outlandish "clockpunk" technology à la Coburn's Our Man Flint films of the 1960s.[4]

A recurring plot device in the film has Hudson and his partner Tommy "Five-Tone" (Aiello) singing songs concurrently but separately, to time and synchronize their exploits. Willis-Aiello duets of Bing Crosby's "Swinging on a Star" and Paul Anka's "Side by Side" are featured on the film's soundtrack.

The film was a huge critical and commercial failure in the United States, only grossing $17 million and earning three Razzies (including Worst Picture), but it was better received internationally and grossed $80 million for a worldwide total of $97 million.

Plot

[edit]

Eddie Hawkins—"Hudson Hawk" (from the bracing winds off the Hudson)—is a master cat burglar and safe-cracker with a penchant for using low-tech solutions against high-tech security systems and for conducting his robberies with precise, synchronized timing (later revealed to be a robust catalog of memorized music that he and his partner(s) sing along with during jobs).

Upon Hawk's release and his first day of parole, he and his former partner, Tommy "Five-Tone" Messina, seek out a good cup of cappuccino. However, before Hawk can get it, he is blackmailed by various entities. These include his parole officer, the minor Mario Brothers Mafia family, and the CIA, who push him into doing a few art heists.

Hawk refuses each, despite mounting pressure and coercion, stating that his only natural desires are to remain out of prison and enjoy a good cup of cappuccino—though he is repeatedly interrupted before doing so. Hawk eventually relents and proceeds to case the art pieces.

Unbeknownst to Hawk, his blackmailers are all manipulated by the American corporation Mayflower Industries, run by husband and wife Darwin and Minerva Mayflower and their butler Alfred. Headquartered in the Esposizione Universale Roma, the company seeks to take over the world by building La Macchina dell'Oro, a machine invented by Leonardo da Vinci that converts lead into gold.

An assembly of crystals needed for the machine to function is hidden in various of Leonardo's artworks: the maquette of the Sforza, the Da Vinci Codex, and a scale model of da Vinci's helicopter. Sister Anna Baragli is an operative for a secret Vatican counter-espionage agency, working with the CIA to assist in Hawk's mission in Rome, intending to foil the robbery at St. Peter's.

After blowing up an auctioneer to cover up the theft of the Sforza, the Mario Bros. take Hawk away in an ambulance. He sticks syringes into Antony Mario's face and falls out of the ambulance on a gurney, and they try to run him down with the ambulance as they speed along the highway.

The brothers get killed when their ambulance crashes. Immediately afterward, Hawk meets CIA head George Kaplan and four codenamed agents (Snickers, Kit Kat, Almond Joy, and Butterfinger) who take him to the Mayflowers.

Hawk successfully steals the Da Vinci Codex from another museum, but later refuses to steal the helicopter design. Tommy Five-Tone fakes his death so they can escape. They are discovered and attacked by the CIA agents; Kaplan reveals that he and his agents stole the piece but, unlike them, had no problem killing the guards. Hawk and Tommy escape when Snickers and Almond Joy are killed and pursue the remaining agents. Kit Kat and Butterfinger take Anna to the castle where the Macchina dell'Oro is reconstructed.

The showdown is in the castle between the remaining CIA agents, the Mayflowers, and the team of Hudson, Five-Tone, and Baragli. Minerva kills Kit Kat and Butterfinger, although Kit Kat frees Baragli before dying. Tommy fights Darwin and Alfred inside a speeding limousine, and Hudson fights George Kaplan on the castle's roof. Kaplan topples from the castle, landing on the limousine. Alfred plants a bomb in it, escaping with Darwin; Tommy gets trapped inside while Kaplan is hanging onto the hood. The bomb detonates as the limousine speeds over a cliff.

Darwin and Minerva force Hawk to assemble the crystal powering the machine, but he intentionally leaves out one small piece. When the machine is activated, it malfunctions and explodes, killing the Mayflowers. Hawk battles Alfred, using his blades to decapitate him.

Hawk and Baragli escape the castle using the da Vinci flying machine. They discover Tommy waiting for them at a café, having miraculously escaped death through a combination of airbags and a sprinkler system in the limo. With the world saved and da Vinci's secrets protected, Hawk finally enjoys a cappuccino.

Cast

[edit]

Production

[edit]

Before Bruce Willis became a full-time actor, he had worked at a bar in New York City. One of the regulars at the bar was Robert Kraft, who worked with Willis on putting a song together called "The Hudson Hawk", with Kraft being inspired by a strong wind that blew from the Hudson River across Manhattan in the fall. Eventually, when Willis became a star, he went back to the idea of doing a super sleuth film, one that Kraft thought could be "the anti-James Bond" with potential for follow-up films. Joel Silver, who had produced Willis with the first two Die Hard films, jumped on producing this film. Maruschka Detmers was originally cast opposite Willis but suffered a back injury and had to depart the role, which saw Andie MacDowell cast.[5] Michael Lehmann, director of films such as Heathers (which had been written by Daniel Waters, who was hired to co-write the screenplay), envisioned Richard E. Grant and Sandra Bernhard as playing manic villains, with one basis of inspiration being Silver. The budget reportedly went from $42 million to around $70 million to go with constant on-set rewriting and rumors of turbulence with producer-star Willis; it was shot in Italy, England, and Hungary. Grant, who spent four months on the production, wrote about his experiences making the films in his book With Nails, listing various stories such as Willis continuously watching his close-ups on the video replay monitors on takes to go with co-star Danny Aiello wanting re-writes for the climax.[6][7]

Soundtrack

[edit]

The soundtrack album was released by Varèse Sarabande in 1991. There are eleven tracks in all. The film's score (represented by tracks 4-9) was composed and conducted by Michael Kamen with Robert Kraft. Kraft also wrote "Hawk Swing" and co-wrote the film's theme with star Bruce Willis.

  1. "Hudson Hawk Theme" - Dr. John (05:38)
  2. "Swinging on a Star" - Bruce Willis and Danny Aiello (02:53) - Sung in incorrect order of verses (the plot device in the movie refers to the original track length as 5:32)
  3. "Side by Side" - Bruce Willis and Danny Aiello (02:18) (the plot device in the film refers to the original track length as 6:00)
  4. "Leonardo" (04:55)
  5. "Welcome to Rome" (01:46)
  6. "Stealing the Codex" (01:58)
  7. "Igg and Ook" (02:22)
  8. "Cartoon Fight" (02:54)
  9. "The Gold Room" (05:57)
  10. "Hawk Swing" (03:41)
  11. "Hudson Hawk Theme" (instrumental) (05:18)

The song "The Power" by Snap! is featured, although not included on the soundtrack, when Hudson Hawk is taken for the first time to the headquarters of the Mayflowers. Minerva Mayflower, played by Sandra Bernhard, is sitting on a desk and sings the song while it plays on her headphones.

Reception

[edit]

On Rotten Tomatoes, the film has a rating of 31% based on 45 reviews, with an average rating of 4.6 out of 10. The site's critics consensus: "Hudson Hawk's kitchen-sink approach to its blend of action and slapstick results in a surreal, baffling misfire."[8] On Metacritic, the film has a weighted average score of 17 out of 100, based on 15 critics, indicating "overwhelming dislike".[9] Audiences polled by CinemaScore gave the film an average grade of "C+" on an A+ to F scale.[10]

In the Chicago Tribune, Terry Clifford observed that: "The end result is being thrown up on selected screens this weekend, and the suspicion that this was a pooch turns out to be undeniably correct. Boring and banal, overwrought and undercooked, Hudson Hawk is beyond bad."[11]

As Kenneth Turan wrote in the Los Angeles Times:

The saddest thing about Hudson Hawk is that director Lehmann and co-screenwriter Waters were previously responsible for the clever, audacious Heathers, a film that represented all that is most promising about American film, while this one represents all that is most moribund and retrograde. Perhaps they both earned enough money here so that they won't be tempted to indulge themselves in similar big-budget fiascoes. Here's hoping.[12]

Roger Ebert and Gene Siskel gave the film a "two thumbs down" review on their At the Movies TV show. Ebert described the film as a complete disaster: "every line starts from zero and gets nowhere". Siskel's review was marginally more positive, saying that Willis had a few funny moments and furthermore that the film might have been salvaged if Willis and Aiello had been the only zany characters against a cast of straight men, as opposed to a cast full of overacting, where everyone tried too hard to make each line funny.[13]

Variety called the film "a relentlessly annoying clay duck that crash-lands in a sea of wretched excess and silliness. Those willing to check their brains at the door may find sparse amusement."[14] Peter Travers of Rolling Stone said of the film: "A movie this unspeakably awful can make an audience a little crazy. You want to throw things, yell at the actors, beg them to stop."[15] James Brundage of AMC filmcritic said the film was "so implausible and so over the top that it lets inconsistency roll off like water on a duck's back."[16] Janet Maslin in the New York Times called the film "a colossally sour and ill-conceived misfire" and denounced the film for "smirky, mean-spirited cynicism."[17] Writing in The Washington Post, Joe Brown said: "To say this megamillion Bruce Willis vehicle doesn't fly is understatement in the extreme... Hudson Hawk offers a klutzy, charmless hero, and wallows dully in limp slapstick and lowest common denominator crudeness."[18] Chris Hicks wrote in the Salt Lake City Deseret News: "What is most amazing is the pervasive silliness that has the cast acting like fools without ever getting a laugh from the audience. It's hard to imagine a major, big-budget movie that could come along this year and be worse than Hudson Hawk, a solid contender for the longest 95 minutes in movie history.[19] Owen Gleiberman in Entertainment Weekly called the film "a fiasco sealed with a smirk."[20]

Jo Berry from Empire gave it three out of five stars, noting that it "reached UK screens with the added burden of having been slaughtered by US critics who likened it to famous big budget turkeys like Raise The Titanic and Ishtar. True, the film has its flaws, but the positives do outweigh the negatives, with Bruce Willis at his wisecracking best in the title role."[21]

Jane Lamacraft reassessed the film as one of the "Forgotten Pleasures of the Multiplex" for Sight & Sound's June 2011 magazine.[citation needed]

Box office

[edit]

The film performed poorly in the United States, partly because the film was intended as an absurd comedy, yet was marketed as an action film one year after the success of Die Hard 2.[22] It grossed only $17 million in the United States and Canada.[23] Internationally, it performed much better, grossing $80 million[24] for a worldwide total of $97 million. By the end of its theatrical run, the film had lost the studio an estimated $90 million.[25]

The film performed well on home video[26] and by 1995 started to pay out to profit participants, including Bruce Willis.[27]

Accolades

[edit]

It received three 1991 Golden Raspberry Awards for Director (Lehmann), Screenplay and Picture with additional nominations for Actor (Willis), Supporting Actor (Grant), and Supporting Actress (Bernhard). It was also nominated for Worst Picture at the 1991 Stinkers Bad Movie Awards, losing to Nothing but Trouble.[28]

Home media

[edit]

The film was released on VHS and LaserDisc in late 1991. Upon its home video release, the tagline "Catch the Excitement, Catch the Adventure, Catch the Hawk" was changed to "Catch the Adventure, Catch The Laughter, Catch the Hawk".[29] Despite the film's failure at the US box office, the film was successful on home video.[26]

It was released twice on DVD, first in 1999 and again in 2007 with new extras. In 2013, Mill Creek Entertainment released Hudson Hawk on Blu-ray for the first time; it was included in a set with Hollywood Homicide. All extras were dropped for the latter release.[30]

Video game

[edit]

A video game based on the film was released in 1991 under the title Hudson Hawk for various home computers and game consoles. Sony Imagesoft released versions of the game for the NES and Game Boy, while Ocean Software released it for the Commodore 64, Amiga, ZX Spectrum, Amstrad CPC, and Atari ST. It is a side-scrolling game where the player, as the Hawk, must steal the Sforza and the Codex from the auction house and the Vatican, respectively. Then, Castle Da Vinci has to be infiltrated in order to steal the mirrored crystal needed to power the gold machine. On his journey, Hawk must face many oddball adversaries, including dachshunds that try to throw him off the roof of the auction house, janitors, photographers, killer nuns and a tennis player (presumably Darwin Mayflower).

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Greenberg, James (May 26, 1991). "FILM; Why the 'Hudson Hawk' Budget Soared So High". The New York Times. Retrieved October 29, 2010.
  2. ^ "Hudson Hawk". The Washington Post. May 24, 1991. Archived from the original on November 11, 2012. Retrieved October 28, 2010.
  3. ^ "'Hawk' Better Fly". Chicago Tribune. June 2, 1991. Archived from the original on June 14, 2012. Retrieved October 29, 2010.
  4. ^ Plaskin, Glenn (May 19, 1991). "Real 'Hudson Hawk'". Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on June 16, 2012. Retrieved October 29, 2010.
  5. ^ Brew, Simon (March 20, 2013). "Looking back at Hudson Hawk". Den of Geek. Retrieved August 31, 2024.
  6. ^ "RICHARD E. GRANT: THE 1991 INTERVIEW". MULTIGLOM. June 24, 2017. Retrieved August 31, 2024.
  7. ^ Searby, Mark (February 8, 2022). "Resurrecting the hawk: Hudson Hawk, over 30 years later". Film Stories. Retrieved August 31, 2024.
  8. ^ "Hudson Hawk". Rotten Tomatoes. Archived from the original on May 30, 2016. Retrieved March 1, 2023.
  9. ^ "Hudson Hawk". Metacritic. Archived from the original on May 17, 2016. Retrieved August 30, 2016.
  10. ^ "Cinemascore". Archived from the original on December 20, 2018. Retrieved August 30, 2019.
  11. ^ Terry, Clifford (May 24, 1991). "Smug 'Hudson Hawk' Looks Like A Turkey". Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on June 10, 2015. Retrieved October 29, 2010.
  12. ^ Turan, Kenneth (May 24, 1991). "Bruce Willis' 'Hudson Hawk' Fails to Fly as Comedy Caper". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on November 3, 2012. Retrieved October 28, 2010.
  13. ^ Siskel and Ebert review Hudson Hawk – via YouTube.
  14. ^ "Hudson Hawk". Variety.com. December 31, 1990. Archived from the original on August 9, 2017. Retrieved December 11, 2017.
  15. ^ Travers, Peter. "Hudson Hawk". Rolling Stone. Archived from the original on June 16, 2008.
  16. ^ Brundage, James. "Hudson Hawk". Filmcritic. Archived from the original on November 6, 2007.
  17. ^ Maslin, Janet (May 24, 1991). "Review/Film Bruce Willis as a Hip Cat Burglar". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 13, 2016. Retrieved August 30, 2016.
  18. ^ Brown, Joe (May 24, 1991). "Hudson Hawk". Washington Post. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved August 30, 2016.
  19. ^ Hicks, Chris (May 27, 1991). "Film review: Hudson Hawk". Deseret News. Archived from the original on October 7, 2016. Retrieved August 30, 2016.
  20. ^ "Hudson Hawk". Entertainment Weekly. May 31, 1991. Archived from the original on June 6, 2016. Retrieved August 30, 2016.
  21. ^ "Hudson Hawk Review". Empire. July 1991. Archived from the original on January 12, 2020. Retrieved January 1, 2020.
  22. ^ Fox, David J. (May 28, 1991). "No Blockbusters Among This Crop of Memorial Day Movies". The Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on November 4, 2012. Retrieved December 20, 2010.
  23. ^ "Hudson Hawk". Box Office Mojo. Archived from the original on June 30, 2009. Retrieved August 3, 2009.
  24. ^ Archerd, Army (October 24, 1991). "Just For Variety". Daily Variety. p. 2.
  25. ^ "Hear me out: why Hudson Hawk isn't a bad movie | Movies". The Guardian. May 14, 2021. Retrieved May 16, 2022.
  26. ^ a b Putzer, Gerald (January 6, 1992). "'Terminator 2' Takes Ring In $200 Million Year". Variety. p. 5.
  27. ^ Archerd, Army (October 19, 1995). "Just For Variety". Daily Variety. p. 2.
  28. ^ "Past Winners Database". The Envelope at LA Times. Archived from the original on January 6, 2007. Retrieved September 25, 2019.
  29. ^ Fox, David J. (May 29, 1991). "'Backdraft' Burns 'Hawk's' Wings at the Box Office". The Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on November 2, 2012. Retrieved October 3, 2010.
  30. ^ "Double Feature - Blu-ray: Hollywood Homicide, Hudson Hawk". millcreekent.com. Mill Creek Entertainment. Archived from the original on July 14, 2017. Retrieved August 8, 2017.
[edit]
Awards
Preceded by Razzie Award for Worst Picture
12th Golden Raspberry Awards
Succeeded by