Talk:Lockheed YF-12: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 21:09, 20 November 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lockheed YF-12 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Aviation: Aircraft C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

C

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Did the YF-12 have a "nickname"?

The A-12 was called Oxcart. The SR-71 was Blackbird. Did people call the YF-12 one of those names, no name at all, or did they give the YF-12 a third name among these related aircraft? 2601:644:8500:2823:6865:9CDD:37EC:A865 (talk) 21:31, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No name was applied to the YF-12. These were pre-production aircraft and only 3 were built plus 1 conversion (YF-12C) from a SR-71. They were only used for testing. -Fnlayson (talk) 21:50, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tu 28?

The Tu 28 is relatively similar to the YF-12, so should it be included in the "See Also" part? Cheers! <3 Taffy boeing b 17 (talk) 21:09, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{Talk header}}
-{{WPMILHIST|Aviation-task-force=yes|class=Start
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
+{{WikiProject Military history|class=Start
 <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. -->
 |B-Class-1=no
@@ Line 10: / Line 12: @@
 <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->
 |B-Class-5=yes
+|Aviation=yes |US=yes}}
-}}
+{{WikiProject Aviation|class=C
-{{WPAVIATION|class=Start|Aircraft-project=yes
 <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. -->
 |B-Class-1=no
@@ Line 22: / Line 24: @@
 <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->
 |B-Class-5=yes
+|Aircraft=yes}}
 }}
-==YF-12 and A-12 are two different planes==
-[[Image:A12Blackbird.JPG|thumbnail|right|An A-12 trainer in LA]]
-The A-12 (one-seater) is a spy-plane like the SR-71 (two-seater).  The YF-12 is an intercepter. Why is the A-12 article redirected to YF-12?  They need two separate articles.
-:The Lockheed YF-12 was a prototype interceptor aircraft that formed the basis for the SR-71 Blackbird.
-The first statement of this article is false.  The A-12 was the basis of both the YF-12 and the SR-71.  The YF-12 was done after A-12 and SR-71.  [[User:Kowloonese|Kowloonese]] 23:01, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
-:Not quite. The A-12, a CIA spy plane, first flew out of Groom Lake in April 1962 and remained secret until 1982. The YF-12 interceptor first flew at Groom Lake in August 1963. President Johnson announced the existence of the YF-12 in February 1964 (mistakingly calling it the A-11), and from this point on the YF-12 was the "cover" airplane for the A-12. The SR-71 first flew in December 1964 (and was already known to the public) and was also used to cover up for the A-12. When A-12s were seen or crashed, the Air Force would simply say to the public that it was actually a YF-12 or an experimental SR-71.
-:I would agree that the A-12 was the basis for both planes, and I'd also agree that the A-12, as a substantially different plane with a substantially different mission, should have its own article. --[[User:68.43.122.246|68.43.122.246]] 20:24, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
-== How to tell them apart ==
-see [[Talk:A-12_Oxcart#How to tell them apart]]
-==Suddenly desclassified?==
-As of May 7th, 2006 exact specifications regarding the performance capabilities of all Blackbird variants still remains classified.  It should be noted that the capabilities presented regarding this aircraft is not accurate and are only speculation.
-On March 6th, 1990, traveling from Los Angeles to Washington, DC in 1 hour, 4 minutes and 20 seconds, a Blackbird once again established a new world speed record for turbine-engine powered aircraft.  That is estimated to be in excess of Mach 3.0 without afterburners.
-Edited the link to direct to the new NMUSAF page for thr YF-12
--gale_dono
-== Wrong About History ==
+== Did the YF-12 have a "nickname"? ==
-About the statement above, the information is incorrect.  The SR-71 came AFTER the YF-12.  If you read the actual history, the first SR-71, #17951, was referred to as the YF-12C; hence, being created after the YF-12A.  The YF-12A is an extention of the A-12 and M-21, the SR-71 having a different tail than the other three, meaning a more reworked design.  And the response above is very correct, the YF flew over a year before the SR.  The A-12 was first, then the YF-12A, and the SR-71 and M-21/D-21 flew on the same day.  That's part of the offical history.
+The A-12 was called Oxcart. The SR-71 was Blackbird. Did people call the YF-12 one of those names, no name at all, or did they give the YF-12 a third name among these related aircraft? [[Special:Contributions/2601:644:8500:2823:6865:9CDD:37EC:A865|2601:644:8500:2823:6865:9CDD:37EC:A865]] ([[User talk:2601:644:8500:2823:6865:9CDD:37EC:A865|talk]]) 21:31, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-On a side note, I will never consider the YF-12 as a serious attempt at a fighter, more like a milti-million dollar cover story.  Think about this:  About this time, the Tri-Service designation took effect.  So, why were all the aircraft from F-1 to F-11 all aircraft that were mostly obsolete?  The F-7, the Sea Dart, was canceled years before, but still got listed.  Why not tack the number on the F-111, or something else IN SERVICE?...  Not to mention, making a fighter out of an aircraft that is very finicky and requires refueling the minute it gets airbourne.  Not something you want the do when you're on QRA (Quick Reaction Alert).  You just as well could get there as fast with F-89's and save the tankers for the trip home.  Plus, using a radar that was to flown 4 years earlier, adds up to a clobbered together cover story to hide the A-12 and how quickly the SR-71 took to the air with little fuss.  I like the A-12, M-21, and SR-71, but was never impressed by the YF-12.  They could have done a lot better job if they were REALLY serious about it.
--Aoiryu
+: No name was applied to the YF-12. These were pre-production aircraft and only 3 were built plus 1 conversion (YF-12C) from a SR-71. They were only used for testing. [[User:Fnlayson|&#45;Fnlayson]] ([[User talk:Fnlayson|talk]]) 21:50, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
-:Something to consider: The YF-12 was merely a prototype; the production version would have been designated F-12B, and probably would have been as refined as the SR-71 was over the A-12. In addition, the F-12 was to be a long-range interceptor, for which the usual fighter manueverability was not a requirement. The MiG-25 was almost as fast, but had little maneverability also.
+== Tu 28? ==
-:As for the designations, the old series was ended at F-111 in 1962; I beleive the F-12 was assigend in 1963 or 64; relly has nothing to do with it being a cover or not. Were the F-4 and F-8 just covers? - [[User:BillCJ|BillCJ]] 17:23, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
+The Tu 28 is relatively similar to the YF-12, so should it be included in the "See Also" part? Cheers! <3 [[User:Taffy boeing b 17|Taffy boeing b 17]] ([[User talk:Taffy boeing b 17|talk]]) 21:09, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
-:The SR-71 prototype was a modified fourth YF-12A serial number 06937. Also, LBJ (Feburary 29, 1964) reportedly misread "AMI" (Advanced Manned Interceptor) as A-11, and this was allowed to stand (it was known that Lockheed's designations for the design evolution of the Blackbird ran from A-1 to A-12, which lent additional credence to the A-11 designation.) Acording to: Lou Drendel, ''SR-71 Blackbird in Action'' Carrollton, Texas: Squadron/Signal Publications, 1982, ISBN 0-89747-136-9, page 4. --[[User:Colputt|Colputt]] 18:55, 21 October 2007 (UTC)