Power Jets WU: Difference between revisions
→Design and development: Lubbock |
m →Design and development: clean up, typo(s) fixed: eg → e.g. |
||
(37 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
⚫ | |||
{{Use British English|date=December 2013}} |
{{Use British English|date=December 2013}} |
||
⚫ | |||
<!-- This article is a part of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft]]. Please see [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/page content]] for recommended layout. --> |
<!-- This article is a part of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft]]. Please see [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/page content]] for recommended layout. --> |
||
{|{{Infobox |
{|{{Infobox aircraft begin |
||
|name= WU |
|name= WU |
||
|image= |
|image= |
||
|caption= |
|caption= |
||
}}{{Infobox |
}}{{Infobox aircraft engine |
||
|type= [[Turbojet]] |
|type= [[Turbojet]] |
||
|manufacturer= [[Power Jets]] |
|manufacturer= [[Power Jets]] |
||
|first run= 12 April |
|first run= 12 April 1937 |
||
|major applications= none |
|major applications= none |
||
|number built = 3 |
|number built = 3 |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
==Design and development== |
==Design and development== |
||
The WU "First Model", also known by Whittle as the first "experimental" engine,<ref>https://www.flightglobal.com/FlightPDFArchive/1945/1945%20-%202018.PDF</ref> and the "1st edition",<ref name=clayton>"The Early History of the Whittle Jet Propulsion Gas Turbine" The First James Clayton Lecture 1945, Air Commodore Frank Whittle, Institution of Mechanical Engineers, London</ref> was the first turbojet engine to be built and run in the world.<ref>"The Development Of Jet And Turbine Aero Engines" 4th edition, Bill Gunston, Patrick Stephens 2006, ISBN |
The WU "First Model", also known by Whittle as the first "experimental" engine,<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/FlightPDFArchive/1945/1945%20-%202018.PDF |title=Archived copy |access-date=26 February 2016 |archive-date=14 April 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160414132417/https://www.flightglobal.com/FlightPDFArchive/1945/1945%20-%202018.PDF |url-status=dead }}</ref> and the "1st edition",<ref name=clayton>"The Early History of the Whittle Jet Propulsion Gas Turbine" The First James Clayton Lecture 1945, Air Commodore Frank Whittle, Institution of Mechanical Engineers, London</ref> was the first turbojet engine to be built and run in the world.<ref>"The Development Of Jet And Turbine Aero Engines" 4th edition, Bill Gunston, Patrick Stephens 2006, {{ISBN|0 7509 4477 3}}, p.124</ref> Although an experimental engine and not intended for flight it was designed to be very light by normal engineering standards.<ref name=clayton/> The engine had four basic components: a single stage [[centrifugal compressor]] with double-sided impeller, a single straight-through [[combustion chamber]], a single stage, axial flow [[turbine]] and a convergent propelling nozzle attached to a jet pipe. The shaft connecting the turbine to the compressor was made as short as possible to avoid whirling.<ref>"Not Much Of An Engineer" Sir Stanley Hooker, The Crowood Press Ltd., Marlborough 2005, {{ISBN|978-1853102851}}, p.72</ref> The combustion chamber was connected to the compressor outlet by a very large single spiral duct giving the engine an asymmetrical appearance. |
||
Whittle designed the centrifugal compressor to develop about 4:1 pressure ratio when, as far as he was aware, the best previously demonstrated performance in a single stage was about 2.5:1. He specified a double sided [[impeller]] to give his required air flow from a smaller diameter impeller than could be obtained from a single-sided one.<ref name=clayton/> The smaller impeller allowed a higher turbine speed which reduced the loading on the single stage turbine and improved its efficiency. The {{convert|16.5|in|mm|abbr=on|0}} diameter turbine had to develop {{convert|3000|hp|kW |
Whittle designed the centrifugal compressor to develop about 4:1 pressure ratio when, as far as he was aware, the best previously demonstrated performance in a single stage was about 2.5:1. He specified a double sided [[impeller]] to give his required air flow from a smaller diameter impeller than could be obtained from a single-sided one.<ref name=clayton/> The smaller impeller allowed a higher turbine speed which reduced the loading on the single stage turbine and improved its efficiency. The {{convert|16.5|in|mm|abbr=on|0}} diameter turbine had to develop {{convert|3000|hp|kW|abbr=on|0}} to drive the compressor. One disadvantage of a double-sided impeller is the requirement, in an aircraft installation, for an intake with a plenum with its higher pressure losses.<ref>"Intake Aerodynamics" Second Edition, Seddon and Goldsmith, AIAA Inc., Reston 1999, {{ISBN|0-632-04963-4}}, p.30</ref> A disadvantage for the design of the rotor thrust bearing is no axial load from the impeller to balance that from the turbine. |
||
Whittle sought help in designing the combustion system and had visited the [[British Industries Fair]]. When he discussed the requirements for his combustion chamber with various exhibitors he had been "practically laughed off every stand" until he discovered Laidlaw, Drew and Company, a firm prepared to tackle the difficult problem of combustion<ref>"World Encyclopedia of Aero Engines - 5th edition" by [[Bill Gunston]], Sutton Publishing, 2006, p.160</ref> at intensities 20x those in refractory-lined industrial applications.<ref>"Gas Turbine Aero-Thermodynamics" Sir Frank Whittle, Pergamon Press Ltd, London 1981, ISBN |
Whittle sought help in designing the combustion system and had visited the [[British Industries Fair]]. When he discussed the requirements for his combustion chamber with various exhibitors he had been "practically laughed off every stand" until he discovered Laidlaw, Drew and Company, a firm prepared to tackle the difficult problem of combustion<ref>"World Encyclopedia of Aero Engines - 5th edition" by [[Bill Gunston]], Sutton Publishing, 2006, p.160</ref> at intensities 20x those in refractory-lined industrial applications.<ref>"Gas Turbine Aero-Thermodynamics" Sir Frank Whittle, Pergamon Press Ltd, London 1981, {{ISBN|978-0-08-026718-0}}, p.161</ref> By the end of 1936 total expenditure on design and manufacture of the engine amounted to £2,000.<ref>"Genesis Of The Jet" John Golley, Airlife Publishing Ltd., Shrewsbury 1996, {{ISBN|1 85310 860 X}}, p.82</ref> |
||
Testing of the first model started on 12 April 1937 at [[Rugby, Warwickshire|Rugby]]. During the testing the [[British Thomson-Houston]] (BTH) Chief Engineer considered it unwise to exceed 12,000 r.p.m. in the open factory for safety reasons after a run on 23 August up to 13,600 r.p.m.<ref>The National Archive, AIR62/15</ref> The 31st and final run was on 24 August 1937. |
Testing of the first model started on 12 April 1937 at [[Rugby, Warwickshire|Rugby]]. During the testing the [[British Thomson-Houston]] (BTH) Chief Engineer considered it unwise to exceed 12,000 r.p.m. in the open factory for safety reasons after a run on 23 August up to 13,600 r.p.m.<ref>The National Archive, AIR62/15</ref> The 31st and final run was on 24 August 1937. |
||
A significantly different |
A significantly different, symmetrical design was adopted for the second model. Ten spiral ducts connected the compressor outlet to a single, large, reverse-flow combustion chamber, the outlet of which discharged forward through the turbine before turning rearwards to exhaust through ten jet pipes. Some heat exchange was expected from the exhaust pipes to the ten ducts delivering air to the combustion chamber as they were all enclosed by the outer casing.<ref name=clayton/> Testing began with a reconstructed engine at the premises of the BTH's redundant Ladywood foundry at nearby [[Lutterworth]] in [[Leicestershire]] on 16 April 1938 and continued until the turbine was damaged on 6 May 1938. A third reconstructed engine was ready for testing on 26 October 1938.<ref name="jg">{{cite book |last1=Golley |first1=John |title=Whittle: The True Story |date=1987 |publisher=Airlife Publishing Ltd. |location=Shrewsbury |isbn=0906393825 |pages=106–107, 114}}</ref> |
||
Significant changes were also introduced in the third model. It had ten reverse-flow combustion chambers giving a similar configuration to that of the later [[Power Jets W.1]] and [[Power Jets W.2]] turbojet engines. This configuration was also adopted for the [[Rolls-Royce Welland]] and [[General Electric J31]] jet engines. One advantage of using 10 combustion chambers, smaller by a factor of (1/sqrt10),<ref name=clayton/> was they could be more easily be tested on a combustion rig. |
Significant changes were also introduced in the third model. It had ten reverse-flow combustion chambers giving a similar configuration to that of the later [[Power Jets W.1]] and [[Power Jets W.2]] turbojet engines. This configuration was also adopted for the [[Rolls-Royce Welland]] and [[General Electric J31]] jet engines. One advantage of using 10 combustion chambers, smaller by a factor of (1/sqrt10),<ref name=clayton/> was they could be more easily be tested on a combustion rig. |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
Owing to a shortage of funds, many of the components would be modified or repaired for testing on later engines. |
Owing to a shortage of funds, many of the components would be modified or repaired for testing on later engines. |
||
Whittle and his team experienced many problems developing the three models. Compressor and turbine efficiencies and durability were improved. Poor fuel system and combustion performance no longer |
Whittle and his team experienced many problems developing the three models. Compressor and turbine efficiencies and durability were improved. Poor fuel system and combustion performance no longer limited the testing of other parts of the engine. The general design of the follow-on W1 engine was very similar to the third model of the experimental engine.<ref name=clayton/> The team demonstrated that the turbojet had the potential to compete with the large reciprocating aero-engines then being mass-produced for the UK Re-armament Programme. |
||
The initial rounded [[Gustaf de Laval|de Laval]]-type turbine blade root fixing was later replaced with a new triangular |
The initial rounded "bulb" [[Gustaf de Laval|de Laval]]-type [[turbine blade]] root fixing was later replaced with a new triangular "fir-tree" design after repeated stress/fatigue failures of the earlier type. The "fir-tree" design would be used on all Whittle's subsequent engines. |
||
After severe initial combustion problems in late 1940 a new design of combustion chamber designed by Isaac Lubbock of the [[Royal Dutch Shell|Shell Fulham Laboratory]] was incorporated. This 'Lubbock' chamber/burner proved the answer to many of the combustion problems. |
After severe initial combustion problems, in late 1940 a new design of combustion chamber designed by Isaac Lubbock of the [[Royal Dutch Shell|Shell Fulham Laboratory]] was incorporated. This 'Lubbock' chamber/burner proved the answer to many of the combustion problems. |
||
The reverse-flow type of combustion chamber, as implemented on the third engine, was necessary to allow the continued use of the more expensive components, e.g. rotor assembly, which had been designed for the completely different straight-through combustion chamber used on the first engine. The reverse-flow arrangement had no thermal expansion problems, it allowed the continued use of a very short shaft between the impeller and turbine, the end covers at the rear of the chambers could be easily removed for inspection and modifications to the combustor components.<ref>"Gas Turbine Aero-Thermodynamics" Sir Frank Whittle, Pergamon Press Ltd, London 1981, {{ISBN|978-0-08-026718-0}}, p.166/7</ref> |
|||
Whittle had assumed the use of [[Vortex|vortex flow]] in the turbine blades however BTH engineers had not incorporated this and had manufactured the blades with insufficient twist. Whittle's subsequent insistence on this subsequently led to deteriorating relations with BTH engineers.<ref>http://web.itu.edu.tr/aydere/history.pdf {{Bare URL PDF|date=March 2022}}</ref> |
|||
The WU was effectively destroyed by turbine disc failure on 22 February 1941. Work continued with the [[Power Jets W.1]].<ref>http://www.imeche.org/docs/default-source/presidents-choice/jc12_1.pdf {{Bare URL PDF|date=March 2022}}</ref> |
|||
==Variants== |
==Variants== |
||
;WU First Model Experimental Engine |
;WU First Model Experimental Engine |
||
:Initial design with asymmetric spiral duct connecting compressor outlet to single straight-through combustion chamber. First run 12 April 1937 |
:Initial design with asymmetric spiral duct connecting compressor outlet to single straight-through combustion chamber. First run 12 April 1937 |
||
Design Data<ref>{{Cite web | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DilcKbMBXRMC&q=Whittle%27s+experimental+engine&pg=PA572 | title=New Scientist| last1=Information| first1=Reed Business| date=27 November 1980}}</ref> |
|||
*Airflow: ~25.7 lb/s (~11.66 kg/s) |
|||
*Shaft Speed: 17750rpm (296rev/s) |
|||
*Turbine Power Output: ~2950 hp (~2200 kW) |
|||
*Compressor Impeller Diameter: ~19.69in (~500mm) |
|||
*Compressor Impeller Tip Speed: ~1525 ft/s (~465 m/s) |
|||
*Turbine Tip Diameter:~15.75in (~400mm) |
|||
*Turbine Tip Speed: ~1220 ft/s (~372 m/s) |
|||
;WU Second Model Experimental Engine |
;WU Second Model Experimental Engine |
||
:single reverse-flow combustion chamber. First run 16 April 1938 |
:single reverse-flow combustion chamber. First run 16 April 1938 |
||
;WU Third Model Experimental Engine |
;WU Third Model Experimental Engine |
||
:Ten reverse-flow combustion chambers. First run 26 October 1938 |
:Ten reverse-flow combustion chambers. First run 26 October 1938 |
||
Line 65: | Line 83: | ||
|compressor= single-stage centrifugal with 19-inch diameter double-sided impeller, diffuser vanes installed part way through testing, material: [[Hiduminium|Hiduminium RR 56]] |
|compressor= single-stage centrifugal with 19-inch diameter double-sided impeller, diffuser vanes installed part way through testing, material: [[Hiduminium|Hiduminium RR 56]] |
||
|combustion=single straight through design, located immediately downstream of elbow in spiral pipe |
|combustion=single straight through design, located immediately downstream of elbow in spiral pipe |
||
|turbine=14-inch diameter with 66 blades (BTH non-vortex design), single stage axial flow, with no nozzle guide vanes, material of disc and blades: [[Firth Brown Steels| |
|turbine=14-inch diameter with 66 blades (BTH non-vortex design), single stage axial flow, with no nozzle guide vanes, material of disc and blades: [[Firth Brown Steels#Stainless steels|Firth-Vickers Stayblade]] |
||
|fueltype=Kerosene |
|fueltype=Kerosene |
||
|oilsystem= |
|oilsystem= |
||
Line 80: | Line 98: | ||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
*[[Heinkel HeS 1]] |
|||
*[[Power Jets W.1]] |
*[[Power Jets W.1]] |
||
*[[Power Jets W.2]] |
*[[Power Jets W.2]] |
||
Line 85: | Line 104: | ||
==References== |
==References== |
||
{{reflist}} |
|||
<references /> |
|||
===Notes=== |
===Notes=== |
||
Line 96: | Line 114: | ||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
{{Commons category|Power Jets WU}} |
|||
*[http://www-g.eng.cam.ac.uk/125/achievements/whittle/whitt-r.htm "A Tribute to a Cambridge engineering student"] |
*[http://www-g.eng.cam.ac.uk/125/achievements/whittle/whitt-r.htm "A Tribute to a Cambridge engineering student"] |
||
*[http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1951/1951%20-%200879.html "The Secret Years"] a 1951 ''Flight'' article. |
*[http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1951/1951%20-%200879.html "The Secret Years"] a 1951 ''Flight'' article. |
||
Line 102: | Line 119: | ||
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20150217142453/http://www.theengineer.co.uk/journals/pdf/21828.pdf "The Whittle Jet Propulsion Gas Turbine"] a 1945 article in ''The Engineer'' |
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20150217142453/http://www.theengineer.co.uk/journals/pdf/21828.pdf "The Whittle Jet Propulsion Gas Turbine"] a 1945 article in ''The Engineer'' |
||
{{Power Jets aeroengines}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
[[Category:Centrifugal-flow turbojet engines]] |
[[Category:Centrifugal-flow turbojet engines]] |
||
[[Category:Power Jets|WU]] |
Latest revision as of 13:30, 21 November 2024
WU | |
---|---|
Type | Turbojet |
Manufacturer | Power Jets |
First run | 12 April 1937 |
Major applications | none |
Number built | 3 |
Developed into | Power Jets W.1 |
The Power Jets WU (Whittle Unit) was a series of three very different experimental jet engines produced and tested by Frank Whittle and his small team in the late 1930s.
Design and development
[edit]The WU "First Model", also known by Whittle as the first "experimental" engine,[1] and the "1st edition",[2] was the first turbojet engine to be built and run in the world.[3] Although an experimental engine and not intended for flight it was designed to be very light by normal engineering standards.[2] The engine had four basic components: a single stage centrifugal compressor with double-sided impeller, a single straight-through combustion chamber, a single stage, axial flow turbine and a convergent propelling nozzle attached to a jet pipe. The shaft connecting the turbine to the compressor was made as short as possible to avoid whirling.[4] The combustion chamber was connected to the compressor outlet by a very large single spiral duct giving the engine an asymmetrical appearance.
Whittle designed the centrifugal compressor to develop about 4:1 pressure ratio when, as far as he was aware, the best previously demonstrated performance in a single stage was about 2.5:1. He specified a double sided impeller to give his required air flow from a smaller diameter impeller than could be obtained from a single-sided one.[2] The smaller impeller allowed a higher turbine speed which reduced the loading on the single stage turbine and improved its efficiency. The 16.5 in (419 mm) diameter turbine had to develop 3,000 hp (2,237 kW) to drive the compressor. One disadvantage of a double-sided impeller is the requirement, in an aircraft installation, for an intake with a plenum with its higher pressure losses.[5] A disadvantage for the design of the rotor thrust bearing is no axial load from the impeller to balance that from the turbine.
Whittle sought help in designing the combustion system and had visited the British Industries Fair. When he discussed the requirements for his combustion chamber with various exhibitors he had been "practically laughed off every stand" until he discovered Laidlaw, Drew and Company, a firm prepared to tackle the difficult problem of combustion[6] at intensities 20x those in refractory-lined industrial applications.[7] By the end of 1936 total expenditure on design and manufacture of the engine amounted to £2,000.[8]
Testing of the first model started on 12 April 1937 at Rugby. During the testing the British Thomson-Houston (BTH) Chief Engineer considered it unwise to exceed 12,000 r.p.m. in the open factory for safety reasons after a run on 23 August up to 13,600 r.p.m.[9] The 31st and final run was on 24 August 1937.
A significantly different, symmetrical design was adopted for the second model. Ten spiral ducts connected the compressor outlet to a single, large, reverse-flow combustion chamber, the outlet of which discharged forward through the turbine before turning rearwards to exhaust through ten jet pipes. Some heat exchange was expected from the exhaust pipes to the ten ducts delivering air to the combustion chamber as they were all enclosed by the outer casing.[2] Testing began with a reconstructed engine at the premises of the BTH's redundant Ladywood foundry at nearby Lutterworth in Leicestershire on 16 April 1938 and continued until the turbine was damaged on 6 May 1938. A third reconstructed engine was ready for testing on 26 October 1938.[10]
Significant changes were also introduced in the third model. It had ten reverse-flow combustion chambers giving a similar configuration to that of the later Power Jets W.1 and Power Jets W.2 turbojet engines. This configuration was also adopted for the Rolls-Royce Welland and General Electric J31 jet engines. One advantage of using 10 combustion chambers, smaller by a factor of (1/sqrt10),[2] was they could be more easily be tested on a combustion rig.
Owing to a shortage of funds, many of the components would be modified or repaired for testing on later engines.
Whittle and his team experienced many problems developing the three models. Compressor and turbine efficiencies and durability were improved. Poor fuel system and combustion performance no longer limited the testing of other parts of the engine. The general design of the follow-on W1 engine was very similar to the third model of the experimental engine.[2] The team demonstrated that the turbojet had the potential to compete with the large reciprocating aero-engines then being mass-produced for the UK Re-armament Programme.
The initial rounded "bulb" de Laval-type turbine blade root fixing was later replaced with a new triangular "fir-tree" design after repeated stress/fatigue failures of the earlier type. The "fir-tree" design would be used on all Whittle's subsequent engines.
After severe initial combustion problems, in late 1940 a new design of combustion chamber designed by Isaac Lubbock of the Shell Fulham Laboratory was incorporated. This 'Lubbock' chamber/burner proved the answer to many of the combustion problems.
The reverse-flow type of combustion chamber, as implemented on the third engine, was necessary to allow the continued use of the more expensive components, e.g. rotor assembly, which had been designed for the completely different straight-through combustion chamber used on the first engine. The reverse-flow arrangement had no thermal expansion problems, it allowed the continued use of a very short shaft between the impeller and turbine, the end covers at the rear of the chambers could be easily removed for inspection and modifications to the combustor components.[11]
Whittle had assumed the use of vortex flow in the turbine blades however BTH engineers had not incorporated this and had manufactured the blades with insufficient twist. Whittle's subsequent insistence on this subsequently led to deteriorating relations with BTH engineers.[12]
The WU was effectively destroyed by turbine disc failure on 22 February 1941. Work continued with the Power Jets W.1.[13]
Variants
[edit]- WU First Model Experimental Engine
- Initial design with asymmetric spiral duct connecting compressor outlet to single straight-through combustion chamber. First run 12 April 1937
Design Data[14]
- Airflow: ~25.7 lb/s (~11.66 kg/s)
- Shaft Speed: 17750rpm (296rev/s)
- Turbine Power Output: ~2950 hp (~2200 kW)
- Compressor Impeller Diameter: ~19.69in (~500mm)
- Compressor Impeller Tip Speed: ~1525 ft/s (~465 m/s)
- Turbine Tip Diameter:~15.75in (~400mm)
- Turbine Tip Speed: ~1220 ft/s (~372 m/s)
- WU Second Model Experimental Engine
- single reverse-flow combustion chamber. First run 16 April 1938
- WU Third Model Experimental Engine
- Ten reverse-flow combustion chambers. First run 26 October 1938
Applications
[edit]None.
Specifications (WU First Model Design Assumptions, performance not actually achieved)
[edit]General characteristics
- Type: Centrifugal flow turbojet
- Length: ~67.2 in (~1707 mm) excluding jet pipe
- Diameter: ~45 in (~1143 mm) across compressor
- Dry weight:
Components
- Compressor: single-stage centrifugal with 19-inch diameter double-sided impeller, diffuser vanes installed part way through testing, material: Hiduminium RR 56
- Combustors: single straight through design, located immediately downstream of elbow in spiral pipe
- Turbine: 14-inch diameter with 66 blades (BTH non-vortex design), single stage axial flow, with no nozzle guide vanes, material of disc and blades: Firth-Vickers Stayblade
- Fuel type: Kerosene
Performance
- Maximum thrust: ~1,389 lbf (~6.18 kN)
- Overall pressure ratio: ~4.4:1
- Air mass flow: ~26lb/s (~11.79 kg/s)
- Turbine inlet temperature: ~1434 F (~779 C)
- Specific fuel consumption: 0.942 lb/hr/lbf (~26.69 g/s/kN)
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 April 2016. Retrieved 26 February 2016.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - ^ a b c d e f "The Early History of the Whittle Jet Propulsion Gas Turbine" The First James Clayton Lecture 1945, Air Commodore Frank Whittle, Institution of Mechanical Engineers, London
- ^ "The Development Of Jet And Turbine Aero Engines" 4th edition, Bill Gunston, Patrick Stephens 2006, ISBN 0 7509 4477 3, p.124
- ^ "Not Much Of An Engineer" Sir Stanley Hooker, The Crowood Press Ltd., Marlborough 2005, ISBN 978-1853102851, p.72
- ^ "Intake Aerodynamics" Second Edition, Seddon and Goldsmith, AIAA Inc., Reston 1999, ISBN 0-632-04963-4, p.30
- ^ "World Encyclopedia of Aero Engines - 5th edition" by Bill Gunston, Sutton Publishing, 2006, p.160
- ^ "Gas Turbine Aero-Thermodynamics" Sir Frank Whittle, Pergamon Press Ltd, London 1981, ISBN 978-0-08-026718-0, p.161
- ^ "Genesis Of The Jet" John Golley, Airlife Publishing Ltd., Shrewsbury 1996, ISBN 1 85310 860 X, p.82
- ^ The National Archive, AIR62/15
- ^ Golley, John (1987). Whittle: The True Story. Shrewsbury: Airlife Publishing Ltd. pp. 106–107, 114. ISBN 0906393825.
- ^ "Gas Turbine Aero-Thermodynamics" Sir Frank Whittle, Pergamon Press Ltd, London 1981, ISBN 978-0-08-026718-0, p.166/7
- ^ http://web.itu.edu.tr/aydere/history.pdf [bare URL PDF]
- ^ http://www.imeche.org/docs/default-source/presidents-choice/jc12_1.pdf [bare URL PDF]
- ^ Information, Reed Business (27 November 1980). "New Scientist".
{{cite web}}
:|first1=
has generic name (help)
Notes
[edit]Bibliography
[edit]External links
[edit]- "A Tribute to a Cambridge engineering student"
- "The Secret Years" a 1951 Flight article.
- "The early history of the Whittle jet propulsion gas turbine", a 1945 I Mech E paper by Frank Whittle.
- "The Whittle Jet Propulsion Gas Turbine" a 1945 article in The Engineer