Jump to content

Design Law Treaty: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
update of infobox and condition for entry into force
 
(27 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
| type =
| type =
| context =
| context =
| date_drafted = 2005 – 2024
| date_drafted = 2005–2024
| date_signed = 22 November 2024
| date_signed = 22 November 2024
| location_signed = [[Riyadh]]
| location_signed = [[Riyadh]]
Line 21: Line 21:
}}
}}


The '''Design Law Treaty''' (DLT), also called the '''Riyadh Design Law Treaty,'''<ref name=":3">{{Cite web |date=22 November 2024 |title=WIPO Member States Adopt Riyadh Design Law Treaty |url=https://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2024/article_0017.html |access-date=2024-11-22 |website=www.wipo.int |language=en}}</ref> is an [[International treaty|international legal instrument]] adopted by the [[World Intellectual Property Organization]] to harmonise part of the [[Industrial design right|design law]], more specifically the application procedures, as well as other matters.
The '''Design Law Treaty''' (DLT), also called the '''Riyadh Design Law Treaty''',<ref name=":3">{{Cite web |date=22 November 2024 |title=WIPO Member States Adopt Riyadh Design Law Treaty |url=https://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2024/article_0017.html |access-date=2024-11-22 |website=www.wipo.int |language=en}}</ref> is an [[International treaty|international legal instrument]] adopted on 22 November 2024 by the [[World Intellectual Property Organization]] (WIPO) in [[Riyadh]]. The goal of the treaty is to harmonise part of the procedural aspects of [[Industrial design right|design law]].


It aims to streamline the global system for protecting [[industrial design]]s, making it easier, faster and more affordable for designers to protect their work in home markets as well as overseas. It will complement the existing [[patent]] and [[trademark]] treaties.<ref name=":2">{{Cite web |title=Diplomatic Conference on Design Law |url=https://www.wipo.int/diplomatic-conferences/en/design-law/index.html |access-date=2024-09-27 |website=www.wipo.int |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Executive Summary: Basic Proposal for a Design Law Treaty (DLT) |url=https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/diplomatic-conferences/en/docs/dlt-dip-conf-executive-summary.pdf |website=wipo.int}}</ref>
The treaty aims to globally streamline the procedures of the system for protecting [[industrial design]]s, in order to make it easier and more affordable for designers to protect their designs in their home markets and abroad.<ref name=":2">{{Cite web |title=Diplomatic Conference on Design Law |url=https://www.wipo.int/diplomatic-conferences/en/design-law/index.html |access-date=2024-09-27 |website=www.wipo.int |language=en}}</ref>


== Background and history ==
== Background and history ==
Line 29: Line 29:
=== 2005 ===
=== 2005 ===


The discussions over the DLT began in 2005, when, at its fifteenth session, the [[World Intellectual Property Organization|WIPO]] Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications<ref>{{Cite web |title=Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications (SCT) |url=https://www.wipo.int/policy/en/sct/ |access-date=2024-09-27 |website=www.wipo.int |language=en}}</ref> (SCT) agreed to start working on design registration formalities and procedures.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2005 |title=STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE LAW OF TRADEMARKS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS. Fifteenth Session |url=https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/sct/en/sct_15/sct_15_2.pdf}}</ref>
The discussions over the DLT began in 2005, when, at its fifteenth session, the [[World Intellectual Property Organization|WIPO]] Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications (SCT) agreed to start working on design registration formalities and procedures.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2005 |title=STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE LAW OF TRADEMARKS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS. Fifteenth Session |url=https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/sct/en/sct_15/sct_15_2.pdf}}</ref>


Work at the SCT kicked off<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |title=The making of the Design Law Treaty - timeline |url=https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/diplomatic-conferences/en/docs/design-law-treaty-timeline.pdf}}</ref> with a questionnaire to gather information about design procedures and formalities in WIPO member states. Based on the returns to the questionnaire<ref>{{Cite web |date=2009 |title=SUMMARY OF REPLIES TO THE QUESTIONNAIRES (PARTS I AND II) ON INDUSTRIAL DESIGN LAW AND PRACTICE (SCT/18/7 AND SCT/18/8 REV.) |url=https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/sct/en/meetings/pdf/wipo_strad_inf_2_rev_2.pdf |website=wipo.int}}</ref> and on several observer organizations’ submissions, the SCT identified existing divergences, common trends and possible areas of convergence, as well as users’ preferred practices.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2011 |title=INFORMATION DOCUMENT ON THE WORK OF THE SCT ON INDUSTRIAL DESIGN LAW AND PRACTICE IN RELATION TO THE WIPO DEVELOPMENT AGENDA RECOMMENDATIONS |url=https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/sct/en/sct_26/sct_26_4.pdf}}</ref> To inform its work, the SCT also requested the Secretariat to prepare a number of information documents<ref>{{Cite web |date=2011 |title=Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications. Twenty-Sixth Session |url=https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/sct/en/sct_26/sct_26_4.pdf}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2012 |title=Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications. Twenty-Eight Session |url=https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/sct/en/sct_29/sct_28_4_rev.pdf}}</ref> and to carry out a Study on the Potential Impact of the Work of the SCT on Industrial Design Law and Practice,<ref>{{Cite web |date=2012 |title=STUDY ON THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF THE WORK OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE LAW OF TRADEMARKS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS (SCT) ON INDUSTRIAL DESIGN LAW AND PRACTICE |url=https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/sct/en/sct_27/sct_27_4.pdf}}</ref> including an analysis of the flexibilities for SCT Members in the draft Articles and draft Rules on Industrial Design Law and Practice.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2013 |title=ADDENDUM TO THE STUDY ON THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF THE WORK OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE LAW OF TRADEMARKS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS (SCT) ON INDUSTRIAL DESIGN LAW AND PRACTICE |url=https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/sct/en/sct_29/sct_27_4_add.pdf}}</ref> This comprehensive preparatory work materialized in a set of draft Articles and draft Regulations, which constitute the basis of the draft treaty.
Work at the SCT kicked off<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |title=The making of the Design Law Treaty - timeline |url=https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/diplomatic-conferences/en/docs/design-law-treaty-timeline.pdf}}</ref> with a questionnaire to gather information about design procedures and formalities in WIPO member states. Based on the returns to the questionnaire<ref>{{Cite web |date=2009 |title=SUMMARY OF REPLIES TO THE QUESTIONNAIRES (PARTS I AND II) ON INDUSTRIAL DESIGN LAW AND PRACTICE (SCT/18/7 AND SCT/18/8 REV.) |url=https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/sct/en/meetings/pdf/wipo_strad_inf_2_rev_2.pdf |website=wipo.int}}</ref> and on several observer organizations’ submissions, the SCT identified existing divergences, common trends and possible areas of convergence, as well as users’ preferred practices.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2011 |title=INFORMATION DOCUMENT ON THE WORK OF THE SCT ON INDUSTRIAL DESIGN LAW AND PRACTICE IN RELATION TO THE WIPO DEVELOPMENT AGENDA RECOMMENDATIONS |url=https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/sct/en/sct_26/sct_26_4.pdf}}</ref> To inform its work, the SCT also requested the Secretariat to prepare a number of information documents<ref>{{Cite web |date=2011 |title=Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications. Twenty-Sixth Session |url=https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/sct/en/sct_26/sct_26_4.pdf}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2012 |title=Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications. Twenty-Eight Session |url=https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/sct/en/sct_29/sct_28_4_rev.pdf}}</ref> and to carry out a Study on the Potential Impact of the Work of the SCT on Industrial Design Law and Practice,<ref>{{Cite web |date=2012 |title=STUDY ON THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF THE WORK OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE LAW OF TRADEMARKS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS (SCT) ON INDUSTRIAL DESIGN LAW AND PRACTICE |url=https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/sct/en/sct_27/sct_27_4.pdf}}</ref> including an analysis of the flexibilities for SCT Members in the draft Articles and draft Rules on Industrial Design Law and Practice.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2013 |title=ADDENDUM TO THE STUDY ON THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF THE WORK OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE LAW OF TRADEMARKS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS (SCT) ON INDUSTRIAL DESIGN LAW AND PRACTICE |url=https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/sct/en/sct_29/sct_27_4_add.pdf}}</ref> This comprehensive preparatory work materialized in a set of draft Articles and draft Regulations, which constitute the basis of the draft treaty.


===2005 - 2022===
===2005–2022===
Over several years, the SCT reviewed in detail a number of iterations of the draft Articles and draft Regulations.<ref name=":0" /> However, two outstanding issues prevented the WIPO General Assembly from agreeing to convene a diplomatic conference until the breakthrough decision of the 2022 WIPO General Assembly.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web |last=Rosati |first=Eleonora |title=[Guest post] An insight into international law-making: Third Special session of the Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications of WIPO |url=https://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2023/10/guest-post-insight-into-international.html |access-date=2024-09-27 |website=The IPKat}}</ref>
Over several years, the SCT reviewed in detail a number of iterations of the draft Articles and draft Regulations.<ref name=":0" /> However, two outstanding issues prevented the WIPO General Assembly from agreeing to convene a diplomatic conference until the breakthrough decision of the 2022 WIPO General Assembly.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web |last=Rosati |first=Eleonora |title=[Guest post] An insight into international law-making: Third Special session of the Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications of WIPO |url=https://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2023/10/guest-post-insight-into-international.html |access-date=2024-09-27 |website=The IPKat}}</ref>


The first issue concerned technical assistance and capacity building.<ref name=":1" />
The first issue concerned technical assistance and capacity building.<ref name=":1" /> Although there appears to be a principle understanding on the importance of provisions on technical assistance and capacity building, one of the unresolved questions is whether those provisions should be adopted in the form of an article in the treaty or a resolution by the Diplomatic Conference Supplementary to the DLT. Delegations still have divergent opinions on that question, which will continue to be discussed during the Diplomatic Conference in November 2024.


The second issue relates to a proposal made in November 2015, at the 34th session of the SCT, by the African Group. The proposal consists in adding in Article 3(1)(a) of the draft DLT, which sets a maximum list of indications or elements to be included in an application for design protection, a non mandatory requirement of disclosure of the origin or source of traditional cultural expressions, traditional knowledge or biological/genetic resources utilized or incorporated in an industrial design. This proposal, however does not have the unanimous support of all Member States. At the occasion of the fifty first (24th ordinary) session of the WIPO General Assembly in 2019, Ambassador Socorro Flores Liera from Mexico, acting as facilitator, proposed a compromise solution, without reaching consensus. The African Group proposal, along with Ambassador Flores’ compromise solution, are part of the Basic Proposal for the draft treaty and will therefore be discussed during the Diplomatic Conference.<ref name=":1" />
The second issue relates to a proposal made in November 2015, at the 34th session of the SCT, by the African Group. The proposal consists in adding in Article 3(1)(a) of the draft DLT, which sets a maximum list of indications or elements to be included in an application for design protection, a non mandatory requirement of disclosure of the origin or source of traditional cultural expressions, traditional knowledge or biological/genetic resources utilized or incorporated in an industrial design. This proposal, however does not have the unanimous support of all Member States. At the occasion of the fifty first (24th ordinary) session of the WIPO General Assembly in 2019, Ambassador Socorro Flores Liera from Mexico, acting as facilitator, proposed a compromise solution, without reaching consensus. The African Group proposal, along with Ambassador Flores’ compromise solution, are part of the Basic Proposal for the draft treaty and will therefore be discussed during the Diplomatic Conference.<ref name=":1" />


=== 2022: Decision to convene a Diplomatic Conference ===
=== 2022: Decision to convene a Diplomatic Conference ===
The decision to convene a Diplomatic Conference to negotiate a Design Law Treaty (DLT) was taken by the 2022 session of the [[World Intellectual Property Organization]] (WIPO) General Assembly, after a number of previous unsuccessful attempts.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Marks & Clerk - Gregory Carty-Hornsby |date=2022-09-21 |title=Design Law Treaty |url=https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=7e17a581-bbc2-494c-8463-89e312d49397 |access-date=2024-09-27 |website=Lexology |language=en}}</ref> At that General Assembly, WIPO member states also decided to convene a Diplomatic Conference to Conclude an International Legal Instrument Relating to Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge Associated with Genetic Resources. This diplomatic conference was held in May 2024 and was successful in adopting the [[WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge]].
The decision to convene a [[Summit (meeting)|Diplomatic Conference]] to negotiate a Design Law Treaty (DLT) was taken by the 2022 session of the [[World Intellectual Property Organization]] (WIPO) General Assembly, after a number of previous unsuccessful attempts.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Marks & Clerk - Gregory Carty-Hornsby |date=2022-09-21 |title=Design Law Treaty |url=https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=7e17a581-bbc2-494c-8463-89e312d49397 |access-date=2024-09-27 |website=Lexology |language=en}}</ref>

The DLT Diplomatic Conference will bring together WIPO member states and accredited observer organizations in a high level meeting to finalize and adopt a new international treaty to be administered by WIPO. Protection for designs is usually obtained through a registration procedure or the grant of a design patent. The rights arising from protection obtained in one country (or region) are limited to that country (or region). Thus, designers need to follow the procedures set by the intellectual property (IP) office of each country in which they seek protection. Those procedures vary significantly from one jurisdiction to another and can be very formalistic. The DLT is expected to make a difference to designers all over the world. The treaty's objective is to make it easier and cheaper for designers to protect their designs in their home markets and abroad by simplifying procedures and streamlining design protection procedures.<ref name=":2" /><ref>{{Cite web |title=Design law steals the show |url=https://www.dennemeyer.com/ip-blog/news/design-law-steals-the-show/ |access-date=2024-09-27 |website=www.dennemeyer.com |language=en}}</ref>


===2023===
===2023===
Line 59: Line 57:


=== Adoption and signatures ===
=== Adoption and signatures ===
On 22 November 2024, the DLT was adopted.<ref name=":3" />
At the end of the Diplomatic Conference, on 22 November 2024, the DLT was adopted.<ref name=":3" />


The WIPO Director General [[Daren Tang]] stated: "After 20 years, and two long weeks – we made history today, and we welcome the 28<sup>th</sup> WIPO Treaty – the Riyadh Design Law Treaty".<ref name=":3" />
The WIPO Director General [[Daren Tang]] stated, at the end of the Diplomatic Conference, on the occasion of this adoption: "After 20 years, and two long weeks – we made history today, and we welcome the 28<sup>th</sup> WIPO Treaty – the Riyadh Design Law Treaty".<ref name=":3" />


== Ratifications and entry into force ==
== Ratifications and entry into force ==
The DLT must have 15 contracting parties to enter into force.<ref name=":3" />
The DLT must have 15 contracting parties to [[enter into force]].<ref name=":3" />


== Legal provisions ==
== Legal provisions ==
The legal provisions of the DLT are as follows, as presented by the [[WIPO]]:<ref name=":3" />
{{Empty section|date=September 2024}}
{{Blockquote|text={{flowlist|
* set a maximum list of indications or elements that designers must submit with an application. [...]
* allow applicants to choose how they represent the design in an application (drawings, photographs or, if admitted by the [[Intellectual property|IP]] office, video).
* allow applicants to include several designs in a single application, under certain conditions.
* set out requirements for the granting of a filing date. [...]
* provide for a grace period of 12 months following a first disclosure of the design, during which such disclosure will not affect its validity for registration.
* allow applicants to keep their designs unpublished for at least six months after having secured a filing date.
* provide relief measures and offer some flexibility to applicants to prevent them from losing their rights if they miss a deadline. [...]
* simplify the procedure for requesting the renewal of a design registration.
* furthers the introduction of e-filing systems for designs and the electronic exchange of [[priority documents]].}}}}


== See also ==
== See also ==
* [[Patent Law Treaty]]
* [[World Intellectual Property Organization]]
* [[Singapore Treaty on the Law of Trademarks]]

⚫
==External links==
⚫
* https://www.wipo.int/diplomatic-conferences/en/design-law/index.html


== References ==
== References ==
<references />
<references />
⚫
==External links==
⚫
* [https://www.wipo.int/diplomatic-conferences/en/design-law/index.html Home page of the DLT 2024 Diplomatic Conference on the WIPO website]
{{WIPO Administered Treaties}}
{{WIPO Administered Treaties}}
{{United Nations}}
{{United Nations}}
Line 86: Line 94:
<!--[[Category:Treaties concluded in Geneva]]-->
<!--[[Category:Treaties concluded in Geneva]]-->
[[Category:World Intellectual Property Organization treaties|Design Law Treaty]]
[[Category:World Intellectual Property Organization treaties|Design Law Treaty]]
[[Category:2024 in Saudi Arabia]]

Latest revision as of 12:46, 23 November 2024

Design Law Treaty
Design Law Treaty
Drafted2005–2024
Signed22 November 2024
LocationRiyadh
Condition15 contracting parties
DepositaryWIPO

The Design Law Treaty (DLT), also called the Riyadh Design Law Treaty,[1] is an international legal instrument adopted on 22 November 2024 by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) in Riyadh. The goal of the treaty is to harmonise part of the procedural aspects of design law.

The treaty aims to globally streamline the procedures of the system for protecting industrial designs, in order to make it easier and more affordable for designers to protect their designs in their home markets and abroad.[2]

Background and history

[edit]

2005

[edit]

The discussions over the DLT began in 2005, when, at its fifteenth session, the WIPO Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications (SCT) agreed to start working on design registration formalities and procedures.[3]

Work at the SCT kicked off[4] with a questionnaire to gather information about design procedures and formalities in WIPO member states. Based on the returns to the questionnaire[5] and on several observer organizations’ submissions, the SCT identified existing divergences, common trends and possible areas of convergence, as well as users’ preferred practices.[6] To inform its work, the SCT also requested the Secretariat to prepare a number of information documents[7][8] and to carry out a Study on the Potential Impact of the Work of the SCT on Industrial Design Law and Practice,[9] including an analysis of the flexibilities for SCT Members in the draft Articles and draft Rules on Industrial Design Law and Practice.[10] This comprehensive preparatory work materialized in a set of draft Articles and draft Regulations, which constitute the basis of the draft treaty.

2005–2022

[edit]

Over several years, the SCT reviewed in detail a number of iterations of the draft Articles and draft Regulations.[4] However, two outstanding issues prevented the WIPO General Assembly from agreeing to convene a diplomatic conference until the breakthrough decision of the 2022 WIPO General Assembly.[11]

The first issue concerned technical assistance and capacity building.[11]

The second issue relates to a proposal made in November 2015, at the 34th session of the SCT, by the African Group. The proposal consists in adding in Article 3(1)(a) of the draft DLT, which sets a maximum list of indications or elements to be included in an application for design protection, a non mandatory requirement of disclosure of the origin or source of traditional cultural expressions, traditional knowledge or biological/genetic resources utilized or incorporated in an industrial design. This proposal, however does not have the unanimous support of all Member States. At the occasion of the fifty first (24th ordinary) session of the WIPO General Assembly in 2019, Ambassador Socorro Flores Liera from Mexico, acting as facilitator, proposed a compromise solution, without reaching consensus. The African Group proposal, along with Ambassador Flores’ compromise solution, are part of the Basic Proposal for the draft treaty and will therefore be discussed during the Diplomatic Conference.[11]

2022: Decision to convene a Diplomatic Conference

[edit]

The decision to convene a Diplomatic Conference to negotiate a Design Law Treaty (DLT) was taken by the 2022 session of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) General Assembly, after a number of previous unsuccessful attempts.[12]

2023

[edit]

In preparation for the Diplomatic Conference, and as mandated by the 2022 WIPO General Assembly Decision, the Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications (SCT) met in a Special Session “to further close any existing gaps to a sufficient level” from October 2 to 6, 2023, in Geneva (Switzerland).[13] This session agreed on the text of the Basic Proposal to be considered by the Diplomatic Conference, consisting of the draft articles and draft rules, along with proposals made by delegations during that session. In addition, a Preparatory Committee of the Diplomatic Conference took place from October 9 to 11, 2023, also in Geneva, to examine the draft administrative provisions and final clauses of the treaty and to agree on the draft rules of procedure, the draft agenda, dates and venue for the Diplomatic Conference.[14][15]

Riyadh Diplomatic Conference of 2024

[edit]

Convening and organization

[edit]

The Diplomatic Conference on the adoption of the DLT was held in Riyadh (Saudi Arabia), between 11 and 22 November 2024.[1]

Participation at the Diplomatic Conference

[edit]

Adoption and signatures

[edit]

At the end of the Diplomatic Conference, on 22 November 2024, the DLT was adopted.[1]

The WIPO Director General Daren Tang stated, at the end of the Diplomatic Conference, on the occasion of this adoption: "After 20 years, and two long weeks – we made history today, and we welcome the 28th WIPO Treaty – the Riyadh Design Law Treaty".[1]

Ratifications and entry into force

[edit]

The DLT must have 15 contracting parties to enter into force.[1]

[edit]

The legal provisions of the DLT are as follows, as presented by the WIPO:[1]

  • set a maximum list of indications or elements that designers must submit with an application. [...]
  • allow applicants to choose how they represent the design in an application (drawings, photographs or, if admitted by the IP office, video).
  • allow applicants to include several designs in a single application, under certain conditions.
  • set out requirements for the granting of a filing date. [...]
  • provide for a grace period of 12 months following a first disclosure of the design, during which such disclosure will not affect its validity for registration.
  • allow applicants to keep their designs unpublished for at least six months after having secured a filing date.
  • provide relief measures and offer some flexibility to applicants to prevent them from losing their rights if they miss a deadline. [...]
  • simplify the procedure for requesting the renewal of a design registration.
  • furthers the introduction of e-filing systems for designs and the electronic exchange of priority documents.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f "WIPO Member States Adopt Riyadh Design Law Treaty". www.wipo.int. 22 November 2024. Retrieved 2024-11-22.
  2. ^ "Diplomatic Conference on Design Law". www.wipo.int. Retrieved 2024-09-27.
  3. ^ "STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE LAW OF TRADEMARKS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS. Fifteenth Session" (PDF). 2005.
  4. ^ a b "The making of the Design Law Treaty - timeline" (PDF).
  5. ^ "SUMMARY OF REPLIES TO THE QUESTIONNAIRES (PARTS I AND II) ON INDUSTRIAL DESIGN LAW AND PRACTICE (SCT/18/7 AND SCT/18/8 REV.)" (PDF). wipo.int. 2009.
  6. ^ "INFORMATION DOCUMENT ON THE WORK OF THE SCT ON INDUSTRIAL DESIGN LAW AND PRACTICE IN RELATION TO THE WIPO DEVELOPMENT AGENDA RECOMMENDATIONS" (PDF). 2011.
  7. ^ "Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications. Twenty-Sixth Session" (PDF). 2011.
  8. ^ "Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications. Twenty-Eight Session" (PDF). 2012.
  9. ^ "STUDY ON THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF THE WORK OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE LAW OF TRADEMARKS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS (SCT) ON INDUSTRIAL DESIGN LAW AND PRACTICE" (PDF). 2012.
  10. ^ "ADDENDUM TO THE STUDY ON THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF THE WORK OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE LAW OF TRADEMARKS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS (SCT) ON INDUSTRIAL DESIGN LAW AND PRACTICE" (PDF). 2013.
  11. ^ a b c Rosati, Eleonora. "[Guest post] An insight into international law-making: Third Special session of the Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications of WIPO". The IPKat. Retrieved 2024-09-27.
  12. ^ Marks & Clerk - Gregory Carty-Hornsby (2022-09-21). "Design Law Treaty". Lexology. Retrieved 2024-09-27.
  13. ^ "Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications: Third special Session". www.wipo.int. Retrieved 2024-09-27.
  14. ^ "Preparatory Committee of the Diplomatic Conference to Conclude and Adopt a Design Law Treaty (DLT)". 2023.
  15. ^ Bagley, Margo A. "Illegal Designs? Enhancing Cultural and Genetic Resource Protection through Design Law" (PDF).
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Design_Law_Treaty&oldid=1259113579"