Jump to content

Talk:Holodomor: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Semi-protected edit request on 23 November 2024: Edit request not done: It requires reliable sources (Edit Request Tool)
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 27: Line 27:
}}
}}


== Holodomor ==
== "While scholars are in consensus that the cause of the famine was man-made" ==
{{Moved discussion from|User talk:Manyareasexpert#Holodomor| [[User:Manyareasexpert|ManyAreasExpert]] ([[User talk:Manyareasexpert|talk]]) 20:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)}}
Hi. I see you reverted my changes. The secondary source bringing the events into connection actually exists and it was mentioned as one of the reference but wasn't made the main thing (Timothy Snyder, "Covert Polish Missions Across the Soviet Ukrainian Border, 1928-1933", 2005). Would it be okay if I rework with making it more prominent and add the primary sources as additional justification, or should I not mention them at all? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Krispe13|Krispe13]] ([[User talk:Krispe13#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Krispe13|contribs]]) 20:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Greetings! I scrolled through Snyder and he has a chapter on the famine so adding him would be fine. I'm generally against adding something based on primary sources as the article is already pretty large by itself and we have lots of secondary sources covering the subject. So why use primary ones. [[User:Manyareasexpert|ManyAreasExpert]] ([[User talk:Manyareasexpert|talk]]) 20:19, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
::Declaring Holodomor a "natural event" that happened due to bad weather conditions rather than an intentional "clean up" of Ukrainian society is a popular propaganda point of those, who deny Holodomor as a genocide based on the assumed lack of intention. Thus, I considered it important to also include the primary sources (such as the "Report to the Seventeenth Party Congress", which states that Ukrainian nationalism became the "chief danger" since it "linked up with the interventionists") that support the claim about the relationships between Prometheus/"Polish agents" activities and Holodomor established by Snyder and several other Ukrainian researches. But I will follow your suggestion and will only stick to the secondary sources. [[User:Krispe13|Krispe13]] ([[User talk:Krispe13|talk]]) 08:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
:::There is already some info on attack on nationalism in the article, which could be extended. [[User:Manyareasexpert|ManyAreasExpert]] ([[User talk:Manyareasexpert|talk]]) 09:17, 14 September 2024 (UTC)


== History section ==
Per [[WP:RS/AC]], "a statement that all or most scientists or scholars hold a certain view requires reliable sourcing that directly says that all or most scientists or scholars hold that view". I'm not seeing this sourced anywhere. Can somehow source this or can it be changed? Thanks.[[User:Stix1776|Stix1776]] ([[User talk:Stix1776|talk]]) 07:26, 21 February 2024 (UTC)


History section is a mess. It has Scope and duration subsection (is it history?), Causes (same?), Death toll, Cannibalism? How to organize it better? I moved the last one down below meanwhile per the attention given to it by RSs. [[User:Manyareasexpert|ManyAreasExpert]] ([[User talk:Manyareasexpert|talk]]) 20:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
:It's explained in the paragraph following the sentence you quote, and in more detail in [[Causes of the Holodomor]]. Some historians believe that it was "deliberately engineered", while others think it was an (unintended) "consequence of rapid Soviet industrialisation", and a third position is that both intentional and unintended factors came together. However, ''no'' serious historian seems to suggest that the famine was entirely or primary due to natural reasons (such as a severe drought) – hence the "consensus". [[User:Gawaon|Gawaon]] ([[User talk:Gawaon|talk]]) 08:36, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
::So no source says it's "consensus", per [[WP:RS/AC]]? It seems that Wheatcroft and Tauger disagree that it's man-made, which explicitly speaks against "academic consensus".[[User:Stix1776|Stix1776]] ([[User talk:Stix1776|talk]]) 16:21, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
:::Hold up consensus isn't unanimity. Tauger is the only one who thinks it was natrual. Wheatcroft (and davis) are the ones who dispute his methodology. Not to mention they say explicitly that policy was the cause of the famine [https://www.uio.no/studier/emner/hf/iakh/HIS2319/h16/pensumliste/stalin-and-the-soviet-famine-of-1932-33_-a-reply-to-ellman.pdf]—[[user:blindlynx|blindlynx]] 17:00, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
::::I've added a citation from Andriewsky 2015 historiography. The relevant section is:
::::{{xt| Historians of Ukraine are no longer debating whether the Famine was the result of natural causes (and even then not exclusively by them). The academic debate appears to come down to the issue of intentions, to whether the special measures undertaken in Ukraine in the winter of 1932-­‐33 that intensified starvation were aimed at Ukrainians as such.}} —[[user:blindlynx|blindlynx]] 17:25, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
::::Plus the article states: "Wheatcroft notes that the Soviet extension of sown area may have exacerbated the problem, which Tauger also acknowledges." – So even Tauger seems to agree that the famine was partially man-made. [[User:Gawaon|Gawaon]] ([[User talk:Gawaon|talk]]) 18:58, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
:::::I've added another source. That said tauger is the ''only'' scholar who argues that its causes were natural and it is [[wp:undue]] to privilege one scholar out of all of the people working on this—[[user:blindlynx|blindlynx]] 21:43, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
::::::@[[User:Blindlynx|Blindlynx]], would you mind putting a page number and quote with that source, because I'm unable to find what you're saying. The article I'm reading starts with "1".
::::::In regards to Andriewsky, he literally states "Historians of Ukraine" as the beginning of the sentence. The article is about how historians of Ukraine treat the issue of the Holodomor. If you want to write "historians of Ukraine" in the lead, I'm fine for it. But nothing states academic consensus as stated in the lead. We're going to ignoring [[WP:RS/AC]]?[[User:Stix1776|Stix1776]] ([[User talk:Stix1776|talk]]) 12:10, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
:::::::571 of the published page 5 of the pre-pub the first paragraph of the 'TERROR BY HUNGER' section. How on earth is historians of Ukraine being in agreement about an event in Ukraine's history not academic consensus? Especially given that the academic debate is not about this but the intentionallity of the famine and everyone researching this sees it as a result of government policy to some extent—[[user:blindlynx|blindlynx]] 15:09, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
::::::Tauger disagrees with other scholars about the size of the harvest. It seems that when he questions the term "man made" he is disagreeing with the position that the famine was intentional.[https://carlbeckpapers.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/cbp/article/view/89/90] [[User:The Four Deuces|TFD]] ([[User talk:The Four Deuces|talk]]) 12:52, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
:::::::Well, but if so that would only show that he misunderstands the meaning of "man-made". An unintentionally man-made famine would still be man-made. [[User:Gawaon|Gawaon]] ([[User talk:Gawaon|talk]]) 13:46, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
::::::::He's mostly arguing that the human causes of the Holod don't set it apart from other most famines as most have similar levels of human causes—[[user:blindlynx|blindlynx]] 16:04, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::The number of human loses is not what defines if that was a genocide or not (can find some references for this claim).The intend as well as the points described in the Genocide Conventionn of 1948 do. [[User:Krispe13|Krispe13]] ([[User talk:Krispe13|talk]]) 08:44, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
::::::::Whether he understands the term correctly or not, he agrees that it was man made within the definition provided in this article. So that seems to mean there is a consensus, just disagreement over intention and whether ethnic Ukrainians were specifically targeted. [[User:The Four Deuces|TFD]] ([[User talk:The Four Deuces|talk]]) 16:17, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::Exactly—[[user:blindlynx|blindlynx]] 17:00, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::@[[User:Blindlynx|Blindlynx]], I added the quote to the source. Is this the correct quote? If not, can you please update it.[[User:Stix1776|Stix1776]] ([[User talk:Stix1776|talk]]) 04:44, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::Thank you!—[[user:blindlynx|blindlynx]] 15:08, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::::Added a short note in the beginning to highlight that the question is not only with regards to whether it was genocide or not, but also (assuming that it was the genocide) then what was the target group. Please review. [[User:Krispe13|Krispe13]] ([[User talk:Krispe13|talk]]) 08:31, 21 May 2024 (UTC)


== Semi-protected edit request on 23 November 2024 ==
== Guys, I think the causes on the side of the article are not causes ==


{{Edit semi-protected|Holodomor|answered=yes}}
Yeah, that's about it. They're not causes, but international reactions. [[User:AccomplishedTale7|AccomplishedTale7]] ([[User talk:AccomplishedTale7|talk]]) 12:21, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
The term Holodomor (death by hunger, in Ukrainian) refers to the starvation of millions of Ukrainians in 1932–33 as a result of Soviet policies. The Holodomor can be seen as the culmination of an assault by the Communist Party and Soviet state on the Ukrainian peasantry, who resisted Soviet policies. This assault occurred in the context of a campaign of intimidation and arrests of Ukrainian intellectuals, writers, artists, religious leaders, and political cadres, who were seen as a threat to Soviet ideological and state-building aspirations. [[Special:Contributions/2A02:A31D:A19C:F000:2D37:491E:AD61:4711|2A02:A31D:A19C:F000:2D37:491E:AD61:4711]] ([[User talk:2A02:A31D:A19C:F000:2D37:491E:AD61:4711|talk]]) 19:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

:{{Not done}}: please provide [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:ESp --> ⸺([[User talk:Randomstaplers|'''Random''']])[[User:Randomstaplers|staplers]] 20:18, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
:I don't know what you mean. The causes listed in the infobox are:
:* Industrialization policy during the First Five Year Plan
:* Whether it was intentional is debated by scholars
:What point are you disputing? — <b>[[User:HandThatFeeds|<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS; color:DarkBlue;cursor:help">The Hand That Feeds You</span>]]:<sup>[[User talk:HandThatFeeds|Bite]]</sup></b> 21:44, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
::Sorry, forgot to say i changed that after seeing this —[[user:blindlynx|blindlynx]] 21:53, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
:::Ah, well, that'll do it! — <b>[[User:HandThatFeeds|<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS; color:DarkBlue;cursor:help">The Hand That Feeds You</span>]]:<sup>[[User talk:HandThatFeeds|Bite]]</sup></b> 21:55, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
::::Weak international reaction (considering first reports about starvation in May-June 1932 ) + soviet denials of hunger are a part of the reason for the high death toll. So it does belong there, but maybe there is a suggestion on how to improve the structure as currently it is more focused on "the starvation was known", but does little to cover soviet denials (take e.g. Walter Duranty, inviting foreign photographers and preparing set up villages for the French delegation etc.). Maybe a separate page to show how the press and internal materials from the archives were supporting or denying the claims in different countries? [[User:Krispe13|Krispe13]] ([[User talk:Krispe13|talk]]) 08:42, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::* suggestion of the separate page is based on the fact that stating that there was a genocide in 30s or even preserving memories of it was persecuted in USSR up till 80s, so the claim-denial timeline might eventually grow.
:::::[[User:Krispe13|Krispe13]] ([[User talk:Krispe13|talk]]) 08:48, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

== we cannot derive this information from census data ourselves ==

[[User:HandThatFeeds]] you have reverted my edition[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Holodomor&diff=prev&oldid=1240491836] saying "we cannot derive this information from census data ourselves", despite this information "between 1926 and 1939, the Ukrainian population increased by only 6.6%, whereas Russia and Belarus grew by 16.9% and 11.7% respectively" is derived from census data by yourselves. So if you have so much knowledge of wiki rules, find the information from '''reliable''' source and add it by yourself. [[User:Пинча|Пинча]] ([[User talk:Пинча|talk]]) 23:23, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

:BTW what about this information: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2019_Ukrainian_presidential_election#Percentages_in_results_table] -- the article contains wrong numbers calculated by yourselves. So fix it too, please. Thank you. [[User:Пинча|Пинча]] ([[User talk:Пинча|talk]]) 23:26, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
:I think it's indeed not OR, but covered by [[WP:CALC]], which says: "Routine calculations do not count as original research, provided there is consensus among editors that the results of the calculations are correct, and a meaningful reflection of the sources." I have checked the calculation and it's correct. And it's also true that we already have other such calculation in the article, at least the cited sentence about population growth. So I think the sentence is a useful addition and can be restored. What do you think, {{u|HandThatFeeds}}? [[User:Gawaon|Gawaon]] ([[User talk:Gawaon|talk]]) 04:50, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 20:18, 23 November 2024

Holodomor

[edit]

Hi. I see you reverted my changes. The secondary source bringing the events into connection actually exists and it was mentioned as one of the reference but wasn't made the main thing (Timothy Snyder, "Covert Polish Missions Across the Soviet Ukrainian Border, 1928-1933", 2005). Would it be okay if I rework with making it more prominent and add the primary sources as additional justification, or should I not mention them at all? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krispe13 (talkcontribs) 20:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! I scrolled through Snyder and he has a chapter on the famine so adding him would be fine. I'm generally against adding something based on primary sources as the article is already pretty large by itself and we have lots of secondary sources covering the subject. So why use primary ones. ManyAreasExpert (talk) 20:19, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declaring Holodomor a "natural event" that happened due to bad weather conditions rather than an intentional "clean up" of Ukrainian society is a popular propaganda point of those, who deny Holodomor as a genocide based on the assumed lack of intention. Thus, I considered it important to also include the primary sources (such as the "Report to the Seventeenth Party Congress", which states that Ukrainian nationalism became the "chief danger" since it "linked up with the interventionists") that support the claim about the relationships between Prometheus/"Polish agents" activities and Holodomor established by Snyder and several other Ukrainian researches. But I will follow your suggestion and will only stick to the secondary sources. Krispe13 (talk) 08:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is already some info on attack on nationalism in the article, which could be extended. ManyAreasExpert (talk) 09:17, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

History section

[edit]

History section is a mess. It has Scope and duration subsection (is it history?), Causes (same?), Death toll, Cannibalism? How to organize it better? I moved the last one down below meanwhile per the attention given to it by RSs. ManyAreasExpert (talk) 20:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 November 2024

[edit]

The term Holodomor (death by hunger, in Ukrainian) refers to the starvation of millions of Ukrainians in 1932–33 as a result of Soviet policies. The Holodomor can be seen as the culmination of an assault by the Communist Party and Soviet state on the Ukrainian peasantry, who resisted Soviet policies. This assault occurred in the context of a campaign of intimidation and arrests of Ukrainian intellectuals, writers, artists, religious leaders, and political cadres, who were seen as a threat to Soviet ideological and state-building aspirations. 2A02:A31D:A19C:F000:2D37:491E:AD61:4711 (talk) 19:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ⸺(Random)staplers 20:18, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]