Jump to content

Talk:Proto-Romance language: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m updated article class and importance
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Proto-Romance language/Archive 1) (bot
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=
{{WPBS|
{{WikiProject Linguistics|class=b|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Linguistics|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Languages|class=b|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Languages|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Latin|class=b|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Latin|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Europe|class=b|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Europe|importance=low}}
}}
}}
{{Archives|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III|age=180}}
{{Archives|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III|age=180}}
Line 11: Line 11:
|counter=1
|counter=1
|minthreadsleft=1
|minthreadsleft=1
|minthreadstoarchive=1
|minthreadstoarchive=0
|algo=old(180d)
|algo=old(180d)
|archive=Talk:Proto-Romance language/Archive %(counter)d
|archive=Talk:Proto-Romance language/Archive %(counter)d
}}
}}

== Isn't this just Vulgar Latin? ==

We all know that the romance languages evolved from Vulgar Latin. So Proto-Romance would've been Vulgar Latin. idk why there's a page about proto romance when you can just search up vulgar latin [[User:TommyVarnt|TommyOrVarnt]] ([[User talk:TommyVarnt|talk]]) 08:15, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 20:29, 23 November 2024

Isn't this just Vulgar Latin?

[edit]

We all know that the romance languages evolved from Vulgar Latin. So Proto-Romance would've been Vulgar Latin. idk why there's a page about proto romance when you can just search up vulgar latin TommyOrVarnt (talk) 08:15, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]