Academic specialization: Difference between revisions
MathKeduor7 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
the the - the |
||
| (35 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Course of study or major at an academic institution, or the field in which a specialist practices}} |
|||
{{improve|reason=poor quality, needs substantial revision|date=November 2024}} |
|||
In [[academy|academia]], specialization (or [[American and British English spelling differences#-ise.2C_-ize_.28-isation.nffe2C_-ization.29|specialisation]]) may refer to a course of study or [[Academic major|major]] at an academic institution, or may refer to the field in which a [[specialist (disambiguation)|specialist]] practices. |
|||
In the case of an educator, academic specialization pertains to the subject that they specialize in and teach.<ref>{{Cite book|title=To Want to Learn:nbnfkr Insights and Provocations for Engaged Learning, ediwow ed.|last=Kytle|first=Jackson|publisher=Palggrave Macmillan|year=2012|isbn=9780230338203|location=New York|pages=120}}</ref> It is considered a precondition of objective truth and works by restricting the mind's propensity for [[eclecticism]] through methodological rigor and studious effort.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|title=Historics: Why History Dominates Contemporary Society|last=Davies|first=Martin|publisher=Routledge|year=2006|isbn=0415261651|location=New York|pages=168}}</ref> It is also employed as an information-management strategy, which operates by fragmenting an issue into different fields or areas of expertise to obtain truth.<ref name=":0" /> In recent years, a new avenue of specialization has manifested through [[double majoring]]. It is a way to allow for a more diverse exposure to the college curriculum.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Pitt |first1=Richard |last2=Pirtle |first2=Whitney N. Laster |last3=Metzger |first3=Ashley Noel |date=2017 |title=Academic Specialization, Double Majoring, and the Threat to Breadth in Academic Knowledge |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/jgeneeduc.66.3-4.0166 |journal=The Journal of General Education |volume=66 |issue=3–4 |pages=166–191 |doi=10.5325/jgeneeduc.66.3-4.0166 |jstor=10.5325/jgeneeduc.66.3-4.0166 |issn=0021-3667}}</ref> |
|||
As the volume of knowledge accumulated by humanity became too great, increasing specialization in academia appeared in response.<ref>{{cite book|title=Yale Forest School News, Volumes 77-78|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7AP0AAAAMAAJ&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=%22specialization%22|year=1990|publisher=Yale Forestry Alumni Assn.|page= 5}}</ref> |
|||
== |
== Development == |
||
As the volume of knowledge accumulated by humanity became too great, increasing specialization in academia appeared in response.<ref>{{cite book|title=Yale Forest School News, Volumes 77-78|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7AP0AAAAMAAJ&q=%22specialization%22|year=1990|publisher=Yale Forestry Alumni Assn.|page= 5}}</ref> There are also cases when this concept emerged from state policymaking to pursue goals such as [[Competition|national competitiveness]]. For instance, there is the case of [[United Kingdom|Britain]] who began coordinating academic specialization — through the founding of the [[Imperial College London|Imperial College]] — to catch up to the [[United States]] and [[Germany]], particularly in the fields of scientific and technical education.<ref>{{Cite book|title=History of Universities: Volume XVIII/1 2003, Volume 18|last=Feingold|first=Mordechai|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2003|isbn=0199262020|location=Oxford|pages=124}}</ref> |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
The split between the sciences and humanities was described by [[C. P. Snow]] as "[[The Two Cultures]]".{{fact|date=November 2024}} |
|||
== Counter-developments == |
|||
[[Interdisciplinary studies]] are an attempt to resist this siloing of knowledge. The [[integrated human studies]] movement is another counter-approach to specialization.{{fact|date=November 2024}} |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
||
{{reflist}} |
{{reflist}} |
||
==Further reading== |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
== See also == |
|||
* [[Academic discipline]] |
|||
* [[List of academic fields]] |
|||
==External links== |
|||
* {{Wikiquote-inline|Specialization}} |
|||
[[Category:Academia|Specialization]] |
[[Category:Academia|Specialization]] |
||
[[Category:Sociology of knowledge]] |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
{{sociology-stub}} |
|||
Latest revision as of 23:54, 23 November 2024
 | This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: poor quality, needs substantial revision. (November 2024) |
In academia, specialization (or specialisation) may refer to a course of study or major at an academic institution, or may refer to the field in which a specialist practices.
In the case of an educator, academic specialization pertains to the subject that they specialize in and teach.[1] It is considered a precondition of objective truth and works by restricting the mind's propensity for eclecticism through methodological rigor and studious effort.[2] It is also employed as an information-management strategy, which operates by fragmenting an issue into different fields or areas of expertise to obtain truth.[2] In recent years, a new avenue of specialization has manifested through double majoring. It is a way to allow for a more diverse exposure to the college curriculum.[3]
Development
[edit]As the volume of knowledge accumulated by humanity became too great, increasing specialization in academia appeared in response.[4] There are also cases when this concept emerged from state policymaking to pursue goals such as national competitiveness. For instance, there is the case of Britain who began coordinating academic specialization — through the founding of the Imperial College — to catch up to the United States and Germany, particularly in the fields of scientific and technical education.[5]
The split between the sciences and humanities was described by C. P. Snow as "The Two Cultures".[citation needed]
Counter-developments
[edit]Interdisciplinary studies are an attempt to resist this siloing of knowledge. The integrated human studies movement is another counter-approach to specialization.[citation needed]
References
[edit]- ^ Kytle, Jackson (2012). To Want to Learn:nbnfkr Insights and Provocations for Engaged Learning, ediwow ed. New York: Palggrave Macmillan. p. 120. ISBN 9780230338203.
- ^ a b Davies, Martin (2006). Historics: Why History Dominates Contemporary Society. New York: Routledge. p. 168. ISBN 0415261651.
- ^ Pitt, Richard; Pirtle, Whitney N. Laster; Metzger, Ashley Noel (2017). "Academic Specialization, Double Majoring, and the Threat to Breadth in Academic Knowledge". The Journal of General Education. 66 (3–4): 166–191. doi:10.5325/jgeneeduc.66.3-4.0166. ISSN 0021-3667. JSTOR 10.5325/jgeneeduc.66.3-4.0166.
- ^ Yale Forest School News, Volumes 77-78. Yale Forestry Alumni Assn. 1990. p. 5.
- ^ Feingold, Mordechai (2003). History of Universities: Volume XVIII/1 2003, Volume 18. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 124. ISBN 0199262020.
Further reading
[edit]- Crichton, Danny (18 February 2010). "Adventures in Academia: The Dangers of (Over)Specialization". Stanford Daily. Retrieved 2017-03-04.
See also
[edit]External links
[edit]
Quotations related to Specialization at Wikiquote
 | This article relating to education is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
 | This sociology-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |