Canon (fiction): Difference between revisions
HeyElliott (talk | contribs) ce |
No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
(23 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{About|the concept of a canon that defines the world of a particular series or franchise|influential works of fiction|Western canon|other uses|Canon (disambiguation){{!}}Canon}} |
{{About|the concept of a canon that defines the world of a particular series or franchise|influential works of fiction|Western canon|other uses|Canon (disambiguation){{!}}Canon}} |
||
{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2021}} |
{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2021}} |
||
[[File:Royal book cover.jpg|''[[The Royal Book of Oz]]'', a canonical work in the [[List of Oz books|Oz]] series |
[[File:Royal book cover.jpg|''[[The Royal Book of Oz]]'', designated as a canonical work in the [[List of Oz books|Oz]] series by original publisher [[Reilly & Lee]].<ref>{{cite web |title="The Wonderful Wizard of Oz": A children's classic lives on though many editions and sequels |url=https://sites.utexas.edu/ransomcentermagazine/2012/05/17/the-wonderful-wizard-of-oz-a-childrens-classic-lives-on-though-many-editions-and-sequels/ |website=sites.utexas.edu |access-date=14 November 2020 |archive-date=17 August 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240817030114/https://sites.utexas.edu/ransomcentermagazine/2012/05/17/the-wonderful-wizard-of-oz-a-childrens-classic-lives-on-though-many-editions-and-sequels/ |url-status=live }}</ref> It was written entirely by [[Ruth Plumly Thompson]] in 1921 after the death of original series writer [[L. Frank Baum]] in 1919.|thumb]] |
||
The '''canon''' of a work of [[fiction]] is "the body of works taking place in a particular [[fictional universe|fictional world]] that are widely considered to be official or authoritative; [especially] those created by the original author or developer of the world".<ref>{{cite dictionary|title=canon, n.¹, additional sense|encyclopedia=[[Oxford English Dictionary]]|date=April 2023|doi=10.1093/OED/8893623977 |
The '''canon''' of a work of [[fiction]] is "the body of works taking place in a particular [[fictional universe|fictional world]] that are widely considered to be official or authoritative; [especially] those created by the original author or developer of the world".<ref>{{cite dictionary|title=canon, n.¹, additional sense|encyclopedia=[[Oxford English Dictionary]]|date=April 2023|doi=10.1093/OED/8893623977|url=https://doi.org/10.1093/OED/8893623977|accessdate=July 25, 2023|archive-date=17 August 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240817030125/https://www.oed.com/dictionary/canon_n1?tl=true|url-status=live}}</ref> Canon is contrasted with, or used as the basis for, works of [[fan fiction]] and other [[derivative work]]s.<ref name="vox">{{cite web|website=[[Vox.com]]|url=https://www.vox.com/2016/6/7/11858680/fandom-glossary-fanfiction-explained|date=June 7, 2016|title=Canon, fanon, shipping and more: a glossary of the tricky terminology that makes up fan culture|last=Romano|first=Aja|accessdate=July 25, 2023|archive-date=20 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210320095339/https://www.vox.com/2016/6/7/11858680/fandom-glossary-fanfiction-explained|url-status=live}}</ref> |
||
==Canonicity== |
== Canonicity == |
||
When there are multiple "official" works or original media, what material is canonical can be unclear. This is resolved either by explicitly excluding certain media from the status of canon (as in the case of ''[[Star Trek]]'' and ''[[Star Wars]]'') |
When there are multiple "official" works or original media, what material is canonical can be unclear. This is resolved either by explicitly excluding certain media from the status of canon (as in the case of ''[[Star Trek]]'' and ''[[Star Wars]]''); by assigning different levels of canonicity to different media; by considering different but licensed media treatments official and equally canonical to the series timeline within their own [[Continuity (fiction)|continuities]]' universe, but not across them; or not resolved at all. There is also no consensus regarding who has the ''authority to decide'' what is or isn't canonical, with copyright holders usually declaring themselves the authorities when they want to erase or [[Retroactive continuity|retcon]] materials that were approved by the setting's original creator (with ''Star Wars'' again being an example). The definition of canon is of particular importance with regard to [[Reboot (fiction)|reboots]] or re-imaginings of established franchises, such as [[Star Trek (2009 film)|the ''Star Trek'' remake (2009)]], because of the ways in which it influences the viewer experience.{{sfn|Urbanski|2013|p=83}} |
||
=== Examples === |
=== Examples === |
||
The official ''[[Star Trek]]'' website describes [[Star Trek canon|''Star Trek'' canon]] as "the events that take place within the episodes and movies" referring to the live-action television series and [[Star Trek (film series)|films]], with ''[[Star Trek: The Animated Series]]'' having long existed in a [[Star Trek: The Animated Series#Canon issues|nebulous gray area of canonicity]].<ref name="trek">{{cite web |url=http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/help/faqs/faq/676.html |title=How do the Star Trek novels and comic books fit into the Star Trek universe? What is considered Star Trek "canon"? |date=10 July 2003 |work=startrek.com |publisher=CBS Studios |archive-date = 28 May 2010|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20100528002622/http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/help/faqs/faq/676.html}}</ref> Events, characters and storylines from tie-in novels, comic books, and video games are explicitly excluded from the ''Star Trek'' canon, but the site notes that elements from these sources have been subsequently introduced into the television series, and says that "canon is not something set in stone |
The official ''[[Star Trek]]'' website describes the [[Star Trek canon|''Star Trek'' canon]] as "the events that take place within the episodes and movies", referring to the live-action television series and [[Star Trek (film series)|films]], with ''[[Star Trek: The Animated Series]]'' having long existed in a [[Star Trek: The Animated Series#Canon issues|nebulous gray area of canonicity]].<ref name="trek">{{cite web |url=http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/help/faqs/faq/676.html |title=How do the Star Trek novels and comic books fit into the Star Trek universe? What is considered Star Trek "canon"? |date=10 July 2003 |work=startrek.com |publisher=CBS Studios |archive-date = 28 May 2010|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20100528002622/http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/help/faqs/faq/676.html}}</ref> Events, characters, and storylines from tie-in novels, comic books, and video games are explicitly excluded from the ''Star Trek'' canon, but the site notes that elements from these sources have been subsequently introduced into the television series, and says that "canon is not something set in stone".<ref name="trek" /> |
||
During [[George Lucas]]' time with the franchise, ''[[Star Wars]]'' canon was divided into [[Star Wars in other media#Holocron database and canonicity|discrete tiers]] that incorporated the [[Star Wars Expanded Universe|Expanded Universe]] (EU), with continuity tracked by [[Lucasfilm]] creative executive [[Leland Chee]]. Higher-tier and newer material abrogated lower-tier and older material in case of contradiction. The live-action theatrical films, the 2008 [[Star Wars: The Clone Wars (2008 TV series)|''The Clone Wars'' TV series]] and its [[Star Wars: The Clone Wars (film)|debut film]], and statements by Lucas himself were at the top of this hierarchy; such works invariably superseded EU material in case of contradiction. The EU itself was further divided into several descending levels of continuity.<ref name="wired">{{cite news |title=Meet Leland Chee, the Star Wars Franchise Continuity Cop |first=Chris |last=Baker |url=https://www.wired.com/entertainment/hollywood/magazine/16-09/ff_starwarscanon?currentPage=all |magazine=[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]] |
During [[George Lucas]]'s time with the franchise, the ''[[Star Wars]]'' canon was divided into [[Star Wars in other media#Holocron database and canonicity|discrete tiers]] that incorporated the [[Star Wars Expanded Universe|Expanded Universe]] (EU), with continuity tracked by [[Lucasfilm]] creative executive [[Leland Chee]]. Higher-tier and newer material abrogated lower-tier and older material in case of contradiction. The live-action theatrical films, the 2008 [[Star Wars: The Clone Wars (2008 TV series)|''The Clone Wars'' TV series]] and its [[Star Wars: The Clone Wars (film)|debut film]], and statements by Lucas himself were at the top of this hierarchy; such works invariably superseded EU material in case of contradiction. The EU itself was further divided into several descending levels of continuity.<ref name="wired">{{cite news |title=Meet Leland Chee, the Star Wars Franchise Continuity Cop |first=Chris |last=Baker |url=https://www.wired.com/entertainment/hollywood/magazine/16-09/ff_starwarscanon?currentPage=all |magazine=[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]] |date=18 August 2008 |access-date=30 April 2010 |archive-date=16 June 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130616063450/http://www.wired.com/entertainment/hollywood/magazine/16-09/ff_starwarscanon?currentPage=all |url-status=live }}</ref> After [[The Walt Disney Company|Disney]]'s acquisition of the franchise, Lucasfilm designated all Expanded Universe material published before 25 April 2014 (other than the first six theatrical films and the 2008 ''The Clone Wars'' film and TV series) as the non-canonical "Legends" continuity. Material released since this announcement is a separate canonical timeline from the original George Lucas Canon, with all narrative development overseen by the Lucasfilm Story Group.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.starwars.com/news/the-legendary-star-wars-expanded-universe-turns-a-new-page|title=The Legendary Star Wars Expanded Universe Turns a New Page|work=StarWars.com|access-date=26 February 2021|archive-date=10 September 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160910044317/http://www.starwars.com/news/the-legendary-star-wars-expanded-universe-turns-a-new-page|url-status=live}}</ref> |
||
The makers of ''[[Doctor Who]]'' have generally avoided making pronouncements about canonicity, with [[Russell T Davies]] explaining that he does not think about the concept for the ''Doctor Who'' television series or its [[Doctor Who spin-offs|spin-offs]].<ref>Doctor Who Magazine #388</ref><ref>Doctor Who Magazine #356</ref><ref>Davies RT, "The Writer's Tales"</ref> |
The makers of ''[[Doctor Who]]'' have generally avoided making pronouncements about canonicity, with [[Russell T Davies]] explaining that he does not think about the concept for the ''Doctor Who'' television series or its [[Doctor Who spin-offs|spin-offs]].<ref>Doctor Who Magazine #388</ref><ref>Doctor Who Magazine #356</ref><ref>Davies RT, "The Writer's Tales"</ref> |
||
The television series ''[[The Simpsons]]'' has as an example of non- |
The television series ''[[The Simpsons]]'' has as an example of non-canonical material, the ''[[Treehouse of Horror]]'' episodes, a series of Halloween-themed specials with several stories that take place outside the show's normal continuity<ref name="Groening1">{{cite video | people=Groening, Matt|date=2002|title=The Simpsons season 2 DVD commentary for the episode "Treehouse of Horror"| medium=DVD|publisher=20th Century Fox}}</ref> |
||
Several [[anime]] television series adapted from [[manga]] stories |
Several [[anime]] television series adapted from [[manga]] stories count with some extra episodes with original stories that are not part of the original manga, often being referred to as "filler episodes," being outside of the canon of their source material.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.cbr.com/anime-filler-guide/ |title=Anime Filler List: What To Skip & What's Worth Watching |author=Ajay Aravind |date=April 7, 2023 |website=[[Comic Book Resources]] |access-date=22 July 2023 |archive-date=22 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230722134945/https://www.cbr.com/anime-filler-guide/ |url-status=live }}</ref> |
||
==Additional works== |
==Additional works== |
||
[[File:The_Field_Bazaar_(The_Athenaeum_Press_1934),_page_1_of_2.jpg|thumb|right|"The Field Bazaar" was rediscovered and reprinted by [[A. G. Macdonell]] in 1934.]] |
[[File:The_Field_Bazaar_(The_Athenaeum_Press_1934),_page_1_of_2.jpg|thumb|right|"The Field Bazaar" was rediscovered and reprinted by [[A. G. Macdonell]] in 1934.]] |
||
===Other writers=== |
===Other writers=== |
||
The |
The canonical status of some works by the original writer but not the same publisher, such as "[[The Field Bazaar]]", may be debated.<ref>{{cite news |title=Invisible Ink: No 197 - The other Sherlock Holmes writers |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/features/invisible-ink-no-197-other-sherlock-holmes-writers-8917628.html |work=The Independent |date=3 November 2013 |language=en}}</ref> |
||
This is because copyright used to be exercised by the publisher of the work of literature rather than the author.<ref>{{cite web |title=When Charles Dickens fell out with America |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-17017791 |website=BBC News |date=14 February 2012}}</ref> |
This is because copyright used to be exercised by the publisher of the work of literature rather than the author.<ref>{{cite web |title=When Charles Dickens fell out with America |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-17017791 |website=BBC News |date=14 February 2012}}</ref> |
||
Campaigning by [[Victor Hugo]] led to the [[Berne Convention]] which introduced [[author's rights]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Oman |first1=Ralph |last2=Flacks |first2=Lewis |title=Berne Revision: The Continuing Drama |url=https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1056&context=iplj |journal=Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law |date=1993 |volume=4 |issue=1}}</ref> |
Campaigning by [[Victor Hugo]] led to the [[Berne Convention]] which introduced [[author's rights]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Oman |first1=Ralph |last2=Flacks |first2=Lewis |title=Berne Revision: The Continuing Drama |url=https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1056&context=iplj |journal=Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law |date=1993 |volume=4 |issue=1 |access-date=18 June 2021 |archive-date=24 June 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210624201927/https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1056&context=iplj |url-status=live }}</ref> |
||
However, sometimes in literature, original writers have not approved works as canon, but original publishers or [[literary estate]]s of original writers posthumously approve subsequent works as canon, such as ''[[The Royal Book of Oz]]'' (1921) (by original publisher),<ref>{{cite news |last1=Gardner |first1=Martin |title=We're Off To See The Wizard |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1971/05/02/archives/were-off-to-see-the-wizard-were-off-to-see-the-wizard.html |work=The New York Times |date=2 May 1971}}</ref> ''[[Porto Bello Gold]]'' (1924) (by estate),<ref>{{cite journal |title=Porto Bello Gold |journal=Smithsonian Libraries |url=https://library.si.edu/donate/adopt-a-book/porto-bello-gold}}</ref> and ''[[Heidi Grows Up]]'' (1938) (by estate).<ref>{{cite news |title=Is Harper Lee's 'Go Set a Watchman' bound for the 'Interstellar' trap? |url=https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/moviesnow/la-et-mn-harper-lee-go-set-a-watchman-new-book-hollywood-20150203-story.html |work=Los Angeles Times |date=4 February 2015 |first1=Steven |last1=Zeitchik }}</ref> |
However, sometimes in literature, original writers have not approved works as canon, but original publishers or [[literary estate]]s of original writers posthumously approve subsequent works as canon, such as ''[[The Royal Book of Oz]]'' (1921) (by original publisher),<ref>{{cite news |last1=Gardner |first1=Martin |title=We're Off To See The Wizard |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1971/05/02/archives/were-off-to-see-the-wizard-were-off-to-see-the-wizard.html |work=The New York Times |date=2 May 1971 |access-date=14 November 2020 |archive-date=3 April 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190403000048/https://www.nytimes.com/1971/05/02/archives/were-off-to-see-the-wizard-were-off-to-see-the-wizard.html |url-status=live }}</ref> ''[[Porto Bello Gold]]'' (1924) (by estate),<ref>{{cite journal |title=Porto Bello Gold |journal=Smithsonian Libraries |url=https://library.si.edu/donate/adopt-a-book/porto-bello-gold |access-date=14 November 2020 |archive-date=17 August 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240817030106/https://library.si.edu/donate/adopt-a-book/porto-bello-gold |url-status=live }}</ref> and ''[[Heidi Grows Up]]'' (1938) (by estate).<ref>{{cite news |title=Is Harper Lee's 'Go Set a Watchman' bound for the 'Interstellar' trap? |url=https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/moviesnow/la-et-mn-harper-lee-go-set-a-watchman-new-book-hollywood-20150203-story.html |work=Los Angeles Times |date=4 February 2015 |first1=Steven |last1=Zeitchik }}</ref> |
||
====Late 20th century==== |
====Late 20th century==== |
||
In film and television |
In film and television it is common that the original writer does not decide what is canon.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Staiger |first1=Janet |title=The Politics of Film Canons |journal=Cinema Journal |date=1985 |volume=24 |issue=3 |pages=4–23 |doi=10.2307/1225428 |jstor=1225428 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1225428 |issn=0009-7101}}</ref> In literature, the estate of [[H. G. Wells]] authorised sequels by [[Stephen Baxter (author)|Stephen Baxter]], ''[[The Massacre of Mankind]]'' (2017) and ''[[The Time Ships]]'' (1995).<ref>{{cite news |title=Tell Us 5 Things About Your Book: A Sequel to 'The War of the Worlds' (Published 2017) |date=3 September 2017 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/03/books/massacre-of-mankind-sequel-to-war-of-worlds-stephen-baxter.html |language=en}}</ref> ''[[Scarlett (Ripley novel)|Scarlett]]'' was a 1991 sequel to ''[[Gone with the Wind (novel)|Gone with the Wind]]'' authorised by the estate.<ref>{{cite news |title=Tomorrow is another Gone With the Wind sequel |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/nov/03/books.usa |work=The Guardian |date=3 November 2007 |language=en |access-date=14 November 2020 |archive-date=17 August 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240817030109/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/nov/03/books.usa |url-status=live }}</ref> |
||
====21st century==== |
====21st century==== |
||
In 2010, the Conan Doyle estate authorised ''[[Young Sherlock Holmes (books)|Young Sherlock Holmes]]''<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/books/2009/mar/18/young-sherlock-holmes-macmillan|title = Macmillan reveals adventures of young Sherlock Holmes|website = [[TheGuardian.com]]|date = 18 March 2009}}</ref> and ''[[The House of Silk]]''. |
In 2010, the Conan Doyle estate authorised ''[[Young Sherlock Holmes (books)|Young Sherlock Holmes]]''<ref>{{Cite web|url = https://www.theguardian.com/books/2009/mar/18/young-sherlock-holmes-macmillan|title = Macmillan reveals adventures of young Sherlock Holmes|website = [[TheGuardian.com]]|date = 18 March 2009|access-date = 18 June 2021|archive-date = 5 June 2020|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200605213853/https://www.theguardian.com/books/2009/mar/18/young-sherlock-holmes-macmillan|url-status = live}}</ref> and ''[[The House of Silk]]''. |
||
Sequels to the stories by [[P G Wodehouse]] about the butler [[Jeeves]] were sanctioned by Wodehouse's estate for ''Jeeves and the Wedding Bells'' (2013) by [[Sebastian Faulks]] and ''[[Jeeves and the King of Clubs]]'' (2018) by [[Ben Schott]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/jeeves-and-the-leap-of-faith-by-ben-schott-review-mpr38csq2 |title=Jeeves and the Leap of Faith by Ben Schott, review – a 'new' Wodehouse |last=Grylls |first=David |date=24 October 2020 |website=The Times}}</ref> ''[[The Monogram Murders]]'' (2014) by [[Sophie Hannah]] is a sequel to [[Hercule Poirot]] novels authorised by the [[Agatha Christie]] estate.<ref>{{cite news |title=Poirot is a show-off, but he's brilliant. That's why I brought him back to life |url=https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/nov/04/hercule-poirot-new-lease-of-life-agatha-christie-orient-express |work=the Guardian |date=2017-11-05 |language=en}}</ref> |
Sequels to the stories by [[P G Wodehouse]] about the butler [[Jeeves]] were sanctioned by Wodehouse's estate for ''Jeeves and the Wedding Bells'' (2013) by [[Sebastian Faulks]] and ''[[Jeeves and the King of Clubs]]'' (2018) by [[Ben Schott]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/jeeves-and-the-leap-of-faith-by-ben-schott-review-mpr38csq2 |title=Jeeves and the Leap of Faith by Ben Schott, review – a 'new' Wodehouse |last=Grylls |first=David |date=24 October 2020 |website=The Times |access-date=13 December 2020 |archive-date=25 November 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201125145202/https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/jeeves-and-the-leap-of-faith-by-ben-schott-review-mpr38csq2 |url-status=live }}</ref> ''[[The Monogram Murders]]'' (2014) by [[Sophie Hannah]] is a sequel to [[Hercule Poirot]] novels authorised by the [[Agatha Christie]] estate.<ref>{{cite news |title=Poirot is a show-off, but he's brilliant. That's why I brought him back to life |url=https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/nov/04/hercule-poirot-new-lease-of-life-agatha-christie-orient-express |work=the Guardian |date=2017-11-05 |language=en |access-date=11 June 2021 |archive-date=21 November 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211121113438/https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/nov/04/hercule-poirot-new-lease-of-life-agatha-christie-orient-express |url-status=live }}</ref> |
||
==Fanon== |
==Fanon== |
||
[[Fan fiction]] is almost never regarded as canonical. However, certain ideas may become influential or widely accepted within fan communities, who refer to such ideas as "'''fanon'''", a blend of ''fan'' and ''canon''.<ref name="wired" /><ref>{{harvnb|Parrish|2007|p=33}}: 'fanon.' Within an individual fandom, certain plotlines may be reinvented so many times and by so many people—or alternately may be written so persuasively by a few writers—that they take on the status of fan-produced canon.</ref> Similarly, the term "'''headcanon'''" is used to describe a fan's personal interpretation of a fictional universe.<ref name="cite-vox">{{cite web |last=Romano |first=Aja |date=7 June 2016 |title=Canon, fanon, shipping and more: a glossary of the tricky terminology that makes up fan culture |url=https://www.vox.com/2016/6/7/11858680/fandom-glossary-fanfiction-explained |access-date=February 19, 2022 |publisher=Vox}}</ref> |
[[Fan fiction]] is almost never regarded as canonical. However, certain ideas may become influential or widely accepted within fan communities, who refer to such ideas as "'''fanon'''", a blend of ''fan'' and ''canon''.<ref name="wired" /><ref>{{harvnb|Parrish|2007|p=33}}: 'fanon.' Within an individual fandom, certain plotlines may be reinvented so many times and by so many people—or alternately may be written so persuasively by a few writers—that they take on the status of fan-produced canon.</ref> Similarly, the term "'''headcanon'''" is used to describe a fan's personal interpretation of a fictional universe.<ref name="cite-vox">{{cite web |last=Romano |first=Aja |date=7 June 2016 |title=Canon, fanon, shipping and more: a glossary of the tricky terminology that makes up fan culture |url=https://www.vox.com/2016/6/7/11858680/fandom-glossary-fanfiction-explained |access-date=February 19, 2022 |publisher=Vox |archive-date=20 March 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210320095339/https://www.vox.com/2016/6/7/11858680/fandom-glossary-fanfiction-explained |url-status=live }}</ref> |
||
==See also== |
==See also== |
Latest revision as of 22:43, 25 November 2024
The canon of a work of fiction is "the body of works taking place in a particular fictional world that are widely considered to be official or authoritative; [especially] those created by the original author or developer of the world".[2] Canon is contrasted with, or used as the basis for, works of fan fiction and other derivative works.[3]
Canonicity
[edit]When there are multiple "official" works or original media, what material is canonical can be unclear. This is resolved either by explicitly excluding certain media from the status of canon (as in the case of Star Trek and Star Wars); by assigning different levels of canonicity to different media; by considering different but licensed media treatments official and equally canonical to the series timeline within their own continuities' universe, but not across them; or not resolved at all. There is also no consensus regarding who has the authority to decide what is or isn't canonical, with copyright holders usually declaring themselves the authorities when they want to erase or retcon materials that were approved by the setting's original creator (with Star Wars again being an example). The definition of canon is of particular importance with regard to reboots or re-imaginings of established franchises, such as the Star Trek remake (2009), because of the ways in which it influences the viewer experience.[4]
Examples
[edit]The official Star Trek website describes the Star Trek canon as "the events that take place within the episodes and movies", referring to the live-action television series and films, with Star Trek: The Animated Series having long existed in a nebulous gray area of canonicity.[5] Events, characters, and storylines from tie-in novels, comic books, and video games are explicitly excluded from the Star Trek canon, but the site notes that elements from these sources have been subsequently introduced into the television series, and says that "canon is not something set in stone".[5]
During George Lucas's time with the franchise, the Star Wars canon was divided into discrete tiers that incorporated the Expanded Universe (EU), with continuity tracked by Lucasfilm creative executive Leland Chee. Higher-tier and newer material abrogated lower-tier and older material in case of contradiction. The live-action theatrical films, the 2008 The Clone Wars TV series and its debut film, and statements by Lucas himself were at the top of this hierarchy; such works invariably superseded EU material in case of contradiction. The EU itself was further divided into several descending levels of continuity.[6] After Disney's acquisition of the franchise, Lucasfilm designated all Expanded Universe material published before 25 April 2014 (other than the first six theatrical films and the 2008 The Clone Wars film and TV series) as the non-canonical "Legends" continuity. Material released since this announcement is a separate canonical timeline from the original George Lucas Canon, with all narrative development overseen by the Lucasfilm Story Group.[7]
The makers of Doctor Who have generally avoided making pronouncements about canonicity, with Russell T Davies explaining that he does not think about the concept for the Doctor Who television series or its spin-offs.[8][9][10]
The television series The Simpsons has as an example of non-canonical material, the Treehouse of Horror episodes, a series of Halloween-themed specials with several stories that take place outside the show's normal continuity[11]
Several anime television series adapted from manga stories count with some extra episodes with original stories that are not part of the original manga, often being referred to as "filler episodes," being outside of the canon of their source material.[12]
Additional works
[edit]Other writers
[edit]The canonical status of some works by the original writer but not the same publisher, such as "The Field Bazaar", may be debated.[13] This is because copyright used to be exercised by the publisher of the work of literature rather than the author.[14] Campaigning by Victor Hugo led to the Berne Convention which introduced author's rights.[15]
However, sometimes in literature, original writers have not approved works as canon, but original publishers or literary estates of original writers posthumously approve subsequent works as canon, such as The Royal Book of Oz (1921) (by original publisher),[16] Porto Bello Gold (1924) (by estate),[17] and Heidi Grows Up (1938) (by estate).[18]
Late 20th century
[edit]In film and television it is common that the original writer does not decide what is canon.[19] In literature, the estate of H. G. Wells authorised sequels by Stephen Baxter, The Massacre of Mankind (2017) and The Time Ships (1995).[20] Scarlett was a 1991 sequel to Gone with the Wind authorised by the estate.[21]
21st century
[edit]In 2010, the Conan Doyle estate authorised Young Sherlock Holmes[22] and The House of Silk. Sequels to the stories by P G Wodehouse about the butler Jeeves were sanctioned by Wodehouse's estate for Jeeves and the Wedding Bells (2013) by Sebastian Faulks and Jeeves and the King of Clubs (2018) by Ben Schott.[23] The Monogram Murders (2014) by Sophie Hannah is a sequel to Hercule Poirot novels authorised by the Agatha Christie estate.[24]
Fanon
[edit]Fan fiction is almost never regarded as canonical. However, certain ideas may become influential or widely accepted within fan communities, who refer to such ideas as "fanon", a blend of fan and canon.[6][25] Similarly, the term "headcanon" is used to describe a fan's personal interpretation of a fictional universe.[26]
See also
[edit]- Alternative universe (fan fiction) – Fan fiction set in a non-canonical universe
- Complete works – collection of all the works of one artist, writer, scientist, musician, group, etc.
- Catalogue raisonné – Comprehensive, annotated listing of all the known artworks by an artist
- Continuity (fiction) – Consistency or continuity of narrative
- Expanded universe – Non-linear additions with consistency to the fictional universe
- Fictional universe – Self-consistent fictional setting with elements that may differ from the real world
- Shared universe – Type of fictional universe in which works written by multiple writers are set
- Parallel universes in fiction – Universe coexisting with another universe
- Reset button technique – Plot device that resets continuity in works of fiction
- Sequel – Part of a linear narrative that continues the story of a previous work
- Text corpus – Digital collections of natural language data
- Middle-earth canon – Works of Tolkien set in Middle-earth
- Retroactive continuity – Revision of existing facts in succeeding works of fiction
- Canon of Sherlock Holmes – Things confirmed about Sherlock Holmes in Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's stories
References
[edit]- ^ ""The Wonderful Wizard of Oz": A children's classic lives on though many editions and sequels". sites.utexas.edu. Archived from the original on 17 August 2024. Retrieved 14 November 2020.
- ^ "canon, n.¹, additional sense". Oxford English Dictionary. April 2023. doi:10.1093/OED/8893623977. Archived from the original on 17 August 2024. Retrieved 25 July 2023.
- ^ Romano, Aja (7 June 2016). "Canon, fanon, shipping and more: a glossary of the tricky terminology that makes up fan culture". Vox.com. Archived from the original on 20 March 2021. Retrieved 25 July 2023.
- ^ Urbanski 2013, p. 83.
- ^ a b "How do the Star Trek novels and comic books fit into the Star Trek universe? What is considered Star Trek "canon"?". startrek.com. CBS Studios. 10 July 2003. Archived from the original on 28 May 2010.
- ^ a b Baker, Chris (18 August 2008). "Meet Leland Chee, the Star Wars Franchise Continuity Cop". Wired. Archived from the original on 16 June 2013. Retrieved 30 April 2010.
- ^ "The Legendary Star Wars Expanded Universe Turns a New Page". StarWars.com. Archived from the original on 10 September 2016. Retrieved 26 February 2021.
- ^ Doctor Who Magazine #388
- ^ Doctor Who Magazine #356
- ^ Davies RT, "The Writer's Tales"
- ^ Groening, Matt (2002). The Simpsons season 2 DVD commentary for the episode "Treehouse of Horror" (DVD). 20th Century Fox.
- ^ Ajay Aravind (7 April 2023). "Anime Filler List: What To Skip & What's Worth Watching". Comic Book Resources. Archived from the original on 22 July 2023. Retrieved 22 July 2023.
- ^ "Invisible Ink: No 197 - The other Sherlock Holmes writers". The Independent. 3 November 2013.
- ^ "When Charles Dickens fell out with America". BBC News. 14 February 2012.
- ^ Oman, Ralph; Flacks, Lewis (1993). "Berne Revision: The Continuing Drama". Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law. 4 (1). Archived from the original on 24 June 2021. Retrieved 18 June 2021.
- ^ Gardner, Martin (2 May 1971). "We're Off To See The Wizard". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 3 April 2019. Retrieved 14 November 2020.
- ^ "Porto Bello Gold". Smithsonian Libraries. Archived from the original on 17 August 2024. Retrieved 14 November 2020.
- ^ Zeitchik, Steven (4 February 2015). "Is Harper Lee's 'Go Set a Watchman' bound for the 'Interstellar' trap?". Los Angeles Times.
- ^ Staiger, Janet (1985). "The Politics of Film Canons". Cinema Journal. 24 (3): 4–23. doi:10.2307/1225428. ISSN 0009-7101. JSTOR 1225428.
- ^ "Tell Us 5 Things About Your Book: A Sequel to 'The War of the Worlds' (Published 2017)". 3 September 2017.
- ^ "Tomorrow is another Gone With the Wind sequel". The Guardian. 3 November 2007. Archived from the original on 17 August 2024. Retrieved 14 November 2020.
- ^ "Macmillan reveals adventures of young Sherlock Holmes". TheGuardian.com. 18 March 2009. Archived from the original on 5 June 2020. Retrieved 18 June 2021.
- ^ Grylls, David (24 October 2020). "Jeeves and the Leap of Faith by Ben Schott, review – a 'new' Wodehouse". The Times. Archived from the original on 25 November 2020. Retrieved 13 December 2020.
- ^ "Poirot is a show-off, but he's brilliant. That's why I brought him back to life". the Guardian. 5 November 2017. Archived from the original on 21 November 2021. Retrieved 11 June 2021.
- ^ Parrish 2007, p. 33: 'fanon.' Within an individual fandom, certain plotlines may be reinvented so many times and by so many people—or alternately may be written so persuasively by a few writers—that they take on the status of fan-produced canon.
- ^ Romano, Aja (7 June 2016). "Canon, fanon, shipping and more: a glossary of the tricky terminology that makes up fan culture". Vox. Archived from the original on 20 March 2021. Retrieved 19 February 2022.
Sources
[edit]- Rebecca Black, "Digital Design: English Language Learners and Reader Reviews in Online Fiction", in A New Literacies Sampler, p. 126
- Parrish, Juli J. (2007). "Inventing a Universe: Reading and writing Internet fan fiction". CiteSeerX 10.1.1.93.419.
- Urbanski, Heather (2013). The Science Fiction Reboot: Canon, Innovation and Fandom in Refashioned Franchises. Jefferson, NC: McFarland. ISBN 978-0-7864-6509-5.
External links
[edit]- The dictionary definition of canon at Wiktionary