Khizr Khan: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
I'm changing birth date and age Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| (16 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{Infobox royalty |
{{Infobox royalty |
||
| name = Khizr Khan |
| name = Khizr Khan |
||
| title = |
| title = |
||
| succession = |
| succession = [[Delhi Sultanate|Ruler of Delhi]] |
||
| image = Khizr Khan (4).jpg |
| image = Khizr Khan (4).jpg |
||
| caption = Silver Tanka of Khizr Khan INO Muhammad Bin Firoz |
| caption = Silver Tanka of Khizr Khan INO Muhammad Bin Firoz |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| reg-type2 = Under the nominal [[suzerainty]] of |
| reg-type2 = Under the nominal [[suzerainty]] of |
||
| regent2 = [[Timur]] |
| regent2 = [[Timur]] |
||
| birth_date = |
| birth_date = 1361 |
||
| death_date = 20 May 1421 (aged |
| death_date = 20 May 1421 |
||
(aged 60) |
|||
| death_place = |
| death_place = |
||
| place of burial = [[Delhi]], [[Medieval India|India]] |
| place of burial = [[Delhi]], [[Medieval India|India]] |
||
| Line 40: | Line 41: | ||
==Ancestry and early life== |
==Ancestry and early life== |
||
A contemporary writer [[Yahya bin Ahmad Sirhindi|Yahya Sirhindi]] says in his ''Takhrikh-i-Mubarak Shahi'' that Khizr Khan was a descendant of [[Muhammad]].<ref>{{Cite book|last1=Porter|first1=Yves|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xj83AQAAIAAJ&q=Sayyid+Khizr+Khan+was+a+arab|title=The Glory of the Sultans: Islamic Architecture in India|last2=Degeorge|first2=Gérard|date=2009|publisher=Flammarion|isbn=978-2-08-030110-9|location=Though Timur had since withdrawn his forces , the Sayyid Khizr Khān , the scion of a venerable Arab family who had settled in Multān, continued to pay him tribute|language=en}}</ref> Members of the dynasty derived their title, [[Sayyid]] (a title of descendants of Muhammad), based on the claim that they belonged to his lineage through his daughter [[Fatimah|Fatima]]. However, Yahya Sirhindi based his conclusions on unsubstantial evidence, the first being a casual recognition by Sayyid Jalaluddin Bukhari of Uch Sharif of his Sayyid heritage,<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CHbiAAAAMAAJ&q=and+rested+chiefly+on+its+causal+recognition+by+the+famous+saint+Sayyid+Jal%C3%A1l|title=The Cambridge History of India|date=1958|publisher=S. Chand|location=The claim of Khizr Khān, who founded the dynasty known as the Sayyids, to descent from the prophet of Arabia was dubious, and rested chiefly on its causal recognition by the famous saint Sayyid Jalāl - ud - dīn of Bukhārā .|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=V2hRAAAAYAAJ&q=Jalaluddin+Bukhari+born+in+uch |title= Journal of Sikh Studies:Volume 20 |page=61 |publisher=Department of Guru Nanak Studies |date=1996 }}</ref> and the second being the Sultan's character whose moral qualities were those of a descendant of Muhammad.<ref>{{cite book |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=03lDAAAAYAAJ&q=The+Delhi+Sultanate+-+Ramesh+Chandra+Majumdar |title= The History and Culture of the Indian People: The Delhi sultanate |author= Ramesh Chandra Majumdar |year= 1951 |publisher= Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan }}</ref> [[Abraham Eraly]] is of the opinion that Khizr Khan's ancestors were likely descendants of an Arab family who had long ago settled in region of Multan during the early Tughluq period, but he doubts his Sayyid lineage.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Eraly |first=Abraham |title=The Age of Wrath: A History of the Delhi Sultanate |date=1 April 2015 |publisher=Penguin UK |isbn=978-93-5118-658-8 |language=en|pages=261|quote=The first of these two dynasties was founded by Khizr Khan, who bore the appellation 'Sayyid', which identified him as a descendant of prophet Muhammad, so the dynasty he founded came to be known as the Sayyid dynasty. The veracity of Khizr Khan's claimed lineage is uncertain, but it is likely that his forebears were Arabs, who had migrated to India in the early Tughluq period and settled in Multan. The family prospered in India, gaining wealth and power. This advancement culminated in Malik Suleiman, Khizr Khan's father, becoming the governor of Multan under the Tughluqs. When Suleiman died, Khizr Khan succeeded him to the post, but lost it during the political turmoil following the death of Firuz Tughluq.}}</ref> According to [[Richard M. Eaton]] and oriental scholar [[Simon Digby (oriental scholar)|Simon Digby]], Khizr Khan was a [[Punjabis|Punjabi]] chieftain belonging to the [[Khokhar]] clan, who was sent to Timur as an ambassador and negotiator from the most adjacent area, the Punjab, ultimately became the power holder in Delhi, thanks to the contacts he had acquired.<ref>{{cite book |title= India in the Persianate Age: 1000–1765 |author= [[Richard M. Eaton|Easton, Richard M.]] |year= 2019 | isbn=978-0520325128 |publisher= University of California Press |page=105|language=en|quote=The career of Khizr Khan, a Punjabi chieftain belonging to the Khokar clan, illustrates the transition to an increasingly polycentric north India.}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |author=[[Simon Digby (oriental scholar)|Digby, Simon]] |title=After Timur Left: North India in the Fifteenth Century |date=13 October 2014 |pages=47–59 |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199450664.003.0002 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199450664.003.0002 |isbn=978-0-19-945066-4 |access-date=25 January 2023 |quote=And we find that a Khokhar chieftain, Khizr Khan who was sent to Timur as an ambassador and negotiator from the most adjacent area, the Punjab, ultimately became the power holder in Delhi, thanks to the contacts he had {{sic|aqu|ired|nolink=y}}.}}</ref> [[Francesca Orsini]] and Samira Sheikh have presented a similar view in their work.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Orsini |first1=Francesca |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=59OFoAEACAAJ&q=after+timur+left |title=After Timur Left: Culture and Circulation in Fifteenth-century North India |last2=Sheikh |first2=Samira |date=2014 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-945066-4 |language=en}}</ref> |
A contemporary writer [[Yahya bin Ahmad Sirhindi|Yahya Sirhindi]] says in his ''Takhrikh-i-Mubarak Shahi'' that Khizr Khan was a descendant of [[Muhammad]].<ref>{{Cite book|last1=Porter|first1=Yves|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xj83AQAAIAAJ&q=Sayyid+Khizr+Khan+was+a+arab|title=The Glory of the Sultans: Islamic Architecture in India|last2=Degeorge|first2=Gérard|date=2009|publisher=Flammarion|isbn=978-2-08-030110-9|location=Though Timur had since withdrawn his forces , the Sayyid Khizr Khān , the scion of a venerable Arab family who had settled in Multān, continued to pay him tribute|language=en}}</ref> Members of the dynasty derived their title, [[Sayyid]] (a title of descendants of Muhammad), based on the claim that they belonged to his lineage through his daughter [[Fatimah|Fatima]]. However, Yahya Sirhindi based his conclusions on unsubstantial evidence, the first being a casual recognition by Sayyid Jalaluddin Bukhari of Uch Sharif of his Sayyid heritage,<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CHbiAAAAMAAJ&q=and+rested+chiefly+on+its+causal+recognition+by+the+famous+saint+Sayyid+Jal%C3%A1l |title=The Cambridge History of India|date=1958|publisher=S. Chand|location=The claim of Khizr Khān, who founded the dynasty known as the Sayyids, to descent from the prophet of Arabia was dubious, and rested chiefly on its causal recognition by the famous saint Sayyid Jalāl - ud - dīn of Bukhārā .|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=V2hRAAAAYAAJ&q=Jalaluddin+Bukhari+born+in+uch |title= Journal of Sikh Studies:Volume 20 |page=61 |publisher=Department of Guru Nanak Studies |date=1996 }}</ref> and the second being the Sultan's character whose moral qualities were those of a descendant of Muhammad.<ref>{{cite book |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=03lDAAAAYAAJ&q=The+Delhi+Sultanate+-+Ramesh+Chandra+Majumdar |title= The History and Culture of the Indian People: The Delhi sultanate |author= Ramesh Chandra Majumdar |year= 1951 |publisher= Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan }}</ref> [[Abraham Eraly]] is of the opinion that Khizr Khan's ancestors were likely descendants of an Arab family who had long ago settled in region of Multan during the early Tughluq period, but he doubts his Sayyid lineage.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Eraly |first=Abraham |title=The Age of Wrath: A History of the Delhi Sultanate |date=1 April 2015 |publisher=Penguin UK |isbn=978-93-5118-658-8 |language=en|pages=261|quote=The first of these two dynasties was founded by Khizr Khan, who bore the appellation 'Sayyid', which identified him as a descendant of prophet Muhammad, so the dynasty he founded came to be known as the Sayyid dynasty. The veracity of Khizr Khan's claimed lineage is uncertain, but it is likely that his forebears were Arabs, who had migrated to India in the early Tughluq period and settled in Multan. The family prospered in India, gaining wealth and power. This advancement culminated in Malik Suleiman, Khizr Khan's father, becoming the governor of Multan under the Tughluqs. When Suleiman died, Khizr Khan succeeded him to the post, but lost it during the political turmoil following the death of Firuz Tughluq.}}</ref> According to [[Richard M. Eaton]] and oriental scholar [[Simon Digby (oriental scholar)|Simon Digby]], Khizr Khan was a [[Punjabis|Punjabi]] chieftain belonging to the [[Khokhar]] clan, who was sent to Timur as an ambassador and negotiator from the most adjacent area, the Punjab, ultimately became the power holder in Delhi, thanks to the contacts he had acquired.<ref>{{cite book |title= India in the Persianate Age: 1000–1765 |author= [[Richard M. Eaton|Easton, Richard M.]] |year= 2019 | isbn=978-0520325128 |publisher= University of California Press |page=105|language=en|quote=The career of Khizr Khan, a Punjabi chieftain belonging to the Khokar clan, illustrates the transition to an increasingly polycentric north India.}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |author=[[Simon Digby (oriental scholar)|Digby, Simon]] |title=After Timur Left: North India in the Fifteenth Century |date=13 October 2014 |pages=47–59 |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199450664.003.0002 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199450664.003.0002 |isbn=978-0-19-945066-4 |access-date=25 January 2023 |quote=And we find that a Khokhar chieftain, Khizr Khan who was sent to Timur as an ambassador and negotiator from the most adjacent area, the Punjab, ultimately became the power holder in Delhi, thanks to the contacts he had {{sic|aqu|ired|nolink=y}}.}}</ref> [[Francesca Orsini]] and Samira Sheikh have presented a similar view in their work.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Orsini |first1=Francesca |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=59OFoAEACAAJ&q=after+timur+left |title=After Timur Left: Culture and Circulation in Fifteenth-century North India |last2=Sheikh |first2=Samira |date=2014 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-945066-4 |language=en}}</ref> |
||
==Reign== |
==Reign== |
||
Latest revision as of 07:45, 26 November 2024
| Khizr Khan | |
|---|---|
.jpg) Silver Tanka of Khizr Khan INO Muhammad Bin Firoz | |
| Ruler of Delhi | |
| Reign | 28 May 1414 – 20 May 1421 |
| Anointment | 28 May 1414 |
| Predecessor | Nasir-ud-Din Mahmud Shah Tughluq |
| Successor | Mubarak Shah |
| Under the nominal suzerainty of | Shah Rukh Mirza |
| Timurid Governor of Multan | |
| Reign | 17 December – 20 December 1398 |
| Timurid Governor of Delhi | |
| Reign | 20 December 1398 – 18 February 1405 |
| Anointment | 21 December 1398 |
| Under the nominal suzerainty of | Timur |
| Born | 1361 |
| Died | 20 May 1421 (aged 60) |
| Burial | |
| Issue | Sayyid Mubarak shah |
| House | Sayyid dynasty |
| Religion | Islam |
Khizr Khan (reigned 28 May 1414 – 20 May 1421) was the founder of the Sayyid dynasty, the fourth ruling dynasty of the Delhi sultanate, in northern India soon after the invasion of Timur and the fall of the Tughlaq dynasty.[1] Khizr Khan was Governor of Multan under the Tughlaq ruler, Firuz Shah Tughlaq, and was known to be an able administrator. He did not take up any royal title due to fear of invasion by Amir Timur (better known historically as Tamerlane) and contended himself with the titles of Rayat-i-Ala (Sublime Banners) and Masnad-i-Aali or (Most High Post). During his reign, coins were continued to be struck in the name of previous Tughlaq rulers.[2] After his death on 20 May 1421, he was succeeded by his son Mubarak Khan,[3] who took the title of Muizz-ud-Din Mubarak Shah.
Ancestry and early life
[edit]A contemporary writer Yahya Sirhindi says in his Takhrikh-i-Mubarak Shahi that Khizr Khan was a descendant of Muhammad.[4] Members of the dynasty derived their title, Sayyid (a title of descendants of Muhammad), based on the claim that they belonged to his lineage through his daughter Fatima. However, Yahya Sirhindi based his conclusions on unsubstantial evidence, the first being a casual recognition by Sayyid Jalaluddin Bukhari of Uch Sharif of his Sayyid heritage,[5][6] and the second being the Sultan's character whose moral qualities were those of a descendant of Muhammad.[7] Abraham Eraly is of the opinion that Khizr Khan's ancestors were likely descendants of an Arab family who had long ago settled in region of Multan during the early Tughluq period, but he doubts his Sayyid lineage.[8] According to Richard M. Eaton and oriental scholar Simon Digby, Khizr Khan was a Punjabi chieftain belonging to the Khokhar clan, who was sent to Timur as an ambassador and negotiator from the most adjacent area, the Punjab, ultimately became the power holder in Delhi, thanks to the contacts he had acquired.[9][10] Francesca Orsini and Samira Sheikh have presented a similar view in their work.[11]
Reign
[edit]After his accession to the throne, Khizr Khan appointed Malik-us-Sharq Tuhfa as his wazir and he was given the title of Taj-ul-Mulk and he remained in office until 1421. The fiefs of Muzaffarnagar and Saharanpur were given to Sayyid Salim. Abdur Rahman received the fiefs of Multan and Fatehpur. In 1414, an army led by Taj-ul-Mulk was sent to suppress the rebellion of Har Singh, the Raja of Katehar. Raja fled to the forests but finally was compelled to surrender and agree to pay tributes in future. In July 1416 an army led by Taj-ul-Mulk was sent to Bayana and Gwalior where it plundered the peasants in the name of realising the amount equivalent to the tributes to be paid and also annexed both the regions.[3] In 1417, Khizr Khan obtained permission from Shah Rukh to have his own name also suffixed to that of Shah Rukh.[12] In 1418, Har Singh revolted again but was defeated completely by Taj-ul-Mulk. On 28 May 1414, Khizr Khan captured Delhi and imprisoned Daulat Khan Lodi.[3]
References
[edit]- ^ Sen, Sailendra (2013). A Textbook of Medieval Indian History. Primus Books. pp. 122–123. ISBN 978-9-38060-734-4.
- ^ Nelson, Wright [1974], The Coinage & Metrology of the Sultans of Dehli, New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt. Ltd., pp. 239.
- ^ a b c Mahajan, V. D. (2007) [1991], History of Medieval India, New Delhi: S. Chand, ISBN 81-219-0364-5, pp. 237–9.
- ^ Porter, Yves; Degeorge, Gérard (2009). The Glory of the Sultans: Islamic Architecture in India. Though Timur had since withdrawn his forces , the Sayyid Khizr Khān , the scion of a venerable Arab family who had settled in Multān, continued to pay him tribute: Flammarion. ISBN 978-2-08-030110-9.
- ^ The Cambridge History of India. The claim of Khizr Khān, who founded the dynasty known as the Sayyids, to descent from the prophet of Arabia was dubious, and rested chiefly on its causal recognition by the famous saint Sayyid Jalāl - ud - dīn of Bukhārā .: S. Chand. 1958.
- ^ Journal of Sikh Studies:Volume 20. Department of Guru Nanak Studies. 1996. p. 61.
- ^ Ramesh Chandra Majumdar (1951). The History and Culture of the Indian People: The Delhi sultanate. Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan.
- ^ Eraly, Abraham (1 April 2015). The Age of Wrath: A History of the Delhi Sultanate. Penguin UK. p. 261. ISBN 978-93-5118-658-8.
The first of these two dynasties was founded by Khizr Khan, who bore the appellation 'Sayyid', which identified him as a descendant of prophet Muhammad, so the dynasty he founded came to be known as the Sayyid dynasty. The veracity of Khizr Khan's claimed lineage is uncertain, but it is likely that his forebears were Arabs, who had migrated to India in the early Tughluq period and settled in Multan. The family prospered in India, gaining wealth and power. This advancement culminated in Malik Suleiman, Khizr Khan's father, becoming the governor of Multan under the Tughluqs. When Suleiman died, Khizr Khan succeeded him to the post, but lost it during the political turmoil following the death of Firuz Tughluq.
- ^ Easton, Richard M. (2019). India in the Persianate Age: 1000–1765. University of California Press. p. 105. ISBN 978-0520325128.
The career of Khizr Khan, a Punjabi chieftain belonging to the Khokar clan, illustrates the transition to an increasingly polycentric north India.
- ^ Digby, Simon (13 October 2014), After Timur Left: North India in the Fifteenth Century, Oxford University Press, pp. 47–59, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199450664.003.0002, ISBN 978-0-19-945066-4, retrieved 25 January 2023,
And we find that a Khokhar chieftain, Khizr Khan who was sent to Timur as an ambassador and negotiator from the most adjacent area, the Punjab, ultimately became the power holder in Delhi, thanks to the contacts he had aquired [sic].
- ^ Orsini, Francesca; Sheikh, Samira (2014). After Timur Left: Culture and Circulation in Fifteenth-century North India. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-945066-4.
- ^ Majumdar, R.C. (ed.) (2006). The Delhi Sultanate, Mumbai: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, pp. 125–8
Further reading
[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Khizr Khan.
- Muntakhab-ul Lubab, Muḥammad Hāshim Khāfī Khān, Sir Henry Miers Elliot, John Dowson, 2006.