Jump to content

Wiener deconvolution: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m there is an error in the formula: no S(f) there.
(19 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Image restoration (motion blur, Wiener filtering).png|thumb|350px|From left: Original image, blurred image, image deblurred using Wiener deconvolution.]]
[[File:Image restoration (motion blur, Wiener filtering).png|thumb|350px|From left: Original image, blurred image, image [[deblurring|deblurred]] using Wiener deconvolution.]]
In [[mathematics]], '''Wiener deconvolution''' is an application of the [[Wiener filter]] to the [[noise]] problems inherent in [[deconvolution]]. It works in the [[frequency domain]], attempting to minimize the impact of deconvolved noise at frequencies which have a poor [[signal-to-noise ratio]].
In [[mathematics]], '''Wiener deconvolution''' is an application of the [[Wiener filter]] to the [[noise]] problems inherent in [[deconvolution]]. It works in the [[frequency domain]], attempting to minimize the impact of deconvolved noise at frequencies which have a poor [[signal-to-noise ratio]].


Line 23: Line 23:
:<math>\ \hat{x}(t) = (g*y)(t)</math>
:<math>\ \hat{x}(t) = (g*y)(t)</math>


where <math>\ \hat{x}(t)</math> is an estimate of <math>\ x(t)</math> that minimizes the [[mean square error]].
where <math>\ \hat{x}(t)</math> is an estimate of <math>\ x(t)</math> that minimizes the [[mean square error]]


: <math>\ \epsilon(t) = \mathbb{E} \left| x(t) - \hat{x}(t) \right|^2</math>,

with <math>\ \mathbb{E}</math> denoting the [[Expected value|expectation]].
The Wiener deconvolution filter provides such a <math>\ g(t)</math>. The filter is most easily described in the [[frequency domain]]:
The Wiener deconvolution filter provides such a <math>\ g(t)</math>. The filter is most easily described in the [[frequency domain]]:


:<math>\ G(f) = \frac{H^*(f)S(f)}{ |H(f)|^2 S(f) + N(f) }</math>
:<math>\ G(f) = \frac{H^*(f)S(f)}{ |H(f)|^2 + N(f) }</math>


where:
where:


* <math>\ G(f)</math> and <math>\ H(f)</math> are the [[Fourier transform]]s of <math>\ g</math> and <math>\ h</math>, respectively at frequency <math>\ f </math>.
* <math>\ G(f)</math> and <math>\ H(f)</math> are the [[Fourier transform]]s of <math>\ g(t)</math> and <math>\ h(t)</math>,
* <math>\ S(f)</math> is the mean [[power spectral density]] of the original signal <math>\ x(t)</math>
* <math>\ S(f) = \mathbb{E}|X(f)|^2 </math> is the mean [[power spectral density]] of the original signal <math>\ x(t)</math>,
* <math>\ N(f)</math> is the mean power spectral density of the noise <math>\ n(t)</math>
* <math>\ N(f) = \mathbb{E}|V(f)|^2 </math> is the mean power spectral density of the noise <math>\ n(t)</math>,
* <math>X(f)</math>, <math>Y(f)</math>, and <math>V(f)</math> are the Fourier transforms of <math>x(t)</math>, and <math>y(t)</math>, and <math>n(t)</math>, respectively,
* the superscript <math>{}^*</math> denotes [[complex conjugate|complex conjugation]].
* the superscript <math>{}^*</math> denotes [[complex conjugate|complex conjugation]].


Line 40: Line 44:
:<math>\ \hat{X}(f) = G(f)Y(f)</math>
:<math>\ \hat{X}(f) = G(f)Y(f)</math>


(where <math>\ \hat{X}(f)</math> and <math>\ Y(f)</math> are the Fourier transforms of <math>\hat{x}(t)</math> and <math>y(t)</math>, respectively) and then performing an [[inverse Fourier transform]] on <math>\ \hat{X}(f)</math> to obtain <math>\ \hat{x}(t)</math>.
and then performing an [[inverse Fourier transform]] on <math>\ \hat{X}(f)</math> to obtain <math>\ \hat{x}(t)</math>.


Note that in the case of images, the arguments <math>\ t </math> and <math>\ f </math> above become two-dimensional; however the result is the same.
Note that in the case of images, the arguments <math>\ t </math> and <math>\ f </math> above become two-dimensional; however the result is the same.
Line 50: Line 54:
:<math>
:<math>
\begin{align}
\begin{align}
G(f) & = \frac{1}{H(f)} \left[ \frac{ |H(f)|^2 }{ |H(f)|^2 + \frac{N(f)}{S(f)} } \right] \\
G(f) & = \frac{1}{H(f)} \left[ \frac{ 1 }{ 1 + 1/(|H(f)|^2 \mathrm{SNR}(f))} \right]
& = \frac{1}{H(f)} \left[ \frac{ |H(f)|^2 }{ |H(f)|^2 + \frac{1}{\mathrm{SNR}(f)}} \right]
\end{align}
\end{align}
</math>
</math>


Here, <math>\ 1/H(f)</math> is the inverse of the original system, and <math>\ \mathrm{SNR}(f) = S(f)/N(f)</math> is the [[signal-to-noise ratio]]. When there is zero noise (i.e. infinite signal-to-noise), the term inside the square brackets equals 1, which means that the Wiener filter is simply the inverse of the system, as we might expect. However, as the noise at certain frequencies increases, the signal-to-noise ratio drops, so the term inside the square brackets also drops. This means that the Wiener filter attenuates frequencies dependent on their signal-to-noise ratio.
Here, <math>\ 1/H(f)</math> is the inverse of the original system, <math>\ \mathrm{SNR}(f) = S(f)/N(f)</math> is the [[signal-to-noise ratio]], and <math>\ |H(f)|^2 \mathrm{SNR}(f)</math> is the ratio of the pure filtered signal to noise spectral density. When there is zero noise (i.e. infinite signal-to-noise), the term inside the square brackets equals 1, which means that the Wiener filter is simply the inverse of the system, as we might expect. However, as the noise at certain frequencies increases, the signal-to-noise ratio drops, so the term inside the square brackets also drops. This means that the Wiener filter attenuates frequencies according to their filtered signal-to-noise ratio.


The Wiener filter equation above requires us to know the spectral content of a typical image, and also that of the noise. Often, we do not have access to these exact quantities, but we may be in a situation where good estimates can be made. For instance, in the case of photographic images, the signal (the original image) typically has strong low frequencies and weak high frequencies, and in many cases the noise content will be relatively flat with frequency.
The Wiener filter equation above requires us to know the spectral content of a typical image, and also that of the noise. Often, we do not have access to these exact quantities, but we may be in a situation where good estimates can be made. For instance, in the case of photographic images, the signal (the original image) typically has strong low frequencies and weak high frequencies, while in many cases the noise content will be relatively flat with frequency.


== Derivation ==
== Derivation ==
Line 63: Line 66:
As mentioned above, we want to produce an estimate of the original signal that minimizes the mean square error, which may be expressed:
As mentioned above, we want to produce an estimate of the original signal that minimizes the mean square error, which may be expressed:


:<math>\ \epsilon(f) = \mathbb{E} \left| X(f) - \hat{X}(f) \right|^2</math>
:<math>\ \epsilon(f) = \mathbb{E} \left| X(f) - \hat{X}(f) \right|^2</math> .


The equivalence to the previous definition of <math>\epsilon</math>, can be derived using [[Plancherel theorem]] or [[Parseval's theorem]] for the [[Fourier transform]].
where <math>\ \mathbb{E}</math> denotes [[Expected value|expectation]].


If we substitute in the expression for <math>\ \hat{X}(f)</math>, the above can be rearranged to
If we substitute in the expression for <math>\ \hat{X}(f)</math>, the above can be rearranged to
Line 92: Line 95:
:<math>\ \mathbb{E}\Big\{X(f)V^*(f)\Big\} = \mathbb{E}\Big\{V(f)X^*(f)\Big\} = 0</math>
:<math>\ \mathbb{E}\Big\{X(f)V^*(f)\Big\} = \mathbb{E}\Big\{V(f)X^*(f)\Big\} = 0</math>


Also, we are defining the power spectral densities as follows:
Substituting the power spectral densities <math>\ S(f) </math> and <math>\ N(f) </math>, we have:

:<math>\ S(f) = \mathbb{E}|X(f)|^2</math>
:<math>\ N(f) = \mathbb{E}|V(f)|^2</math>

Therefore, we have:


:<math>
:<math>
Line 106: Line 104:


:<math>\
:<math>\
\frac{d\epsilon(f)}{dG(f)} = G^*(f)N(f) - H(f)\Big[1 - G(f)H(f)\Big]^* S(f) = 0
\frac{d\epsilon(f)}{dG(f)} = 0 \Rightarrow G^*(f)N(f) - H(f)\Big[1 - G(f)H(f)\Big]^* S(f) = 0
</math>
</math>


Line 126: Line 124:
== External links ==
== External links ==
* [http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/~elec539/Projects99/BACH/proj2/blind/bd.html Comparison of different deconvolution methods.]
* [http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/~elec539/Projects99/BACH/proj2/blind/bd.html Comparison of different deconvolution methods.]
* [http://cnx.org/content/m13144/latest/ Deconvolution with a Wiener filter]


[[Category:Signal estimation]]
[[Category:Signal estimation]]

Revision as of 08:00, 26 November 2024

From left: Original image, blurred image, image deblurred using Wiener deconvolution.

In mathematics, Wiener deconvolution is an application of the Wiener filter to the noise problems inherent in deconvolution. It works in the frequency domain, attempting to minimize the impact of deconvolved noise at frequencies which have a poor signal-to-noise ratio.

The Wiener deconvolution method has widespread use in image deconvolution applications, as the frequency spectrum of most visual images is fairly well behaved and may be estimated easily.

Wiener deconvolution is named after Norbert Wiener.

Definition

Given a system:

where denotes convolution and:

  • is some original signal (unknown) at time .
  • is the known impulse response of a linear time-invariant system
  • is some unknown additive noise, independent of
  • is our observed signal

Our goal is to find some so that we can estimate as follows:

where is an estimate of that minimizes the mean square error

,

with denoting the expectation. The Wiener deconvolution filter provides such a . The filter is most easily described in the frequency domain:

where:

  • and are the Fourier transforms of and ,
  • is the mean power spectral density of the original signal ,
  • is the mean power spectral density of the noise ,
  • , , and are the Fourier transforms of , and , and , respectively,
  • the superscript denotes complex conjugation.

The filtering operation may either be carried out in the time-domain, as above, or in the frequency domain:

and then performing an inverse Fourier transform on to obtain .

Note that in the case of images, the arguments and above become two-dimensional; however the result is the same.

Interpretation

The operation of the Wiener filter becomes apparent when the filter equation above is rewritten:

Here, is the inverse of the original system, is the signal-to-noise ratio, and is the ratio of the pure filtered signal to noise spectral density. When there is zero noise (i.e. infinite signal-to-noise), the term inside the square brackets equals 1, which means that the Wiener filter is simply the inverse of the system, as we might expect. However, as the noise at certain frequencies increases, the signal-to-noise ratio drops, so the term inside the square brackets also drops. This means that the Wiener filter attenuates frequencies according to their filtered signal-to-noise ratio.

The Wiener filter equation above requires us to know the spectral content of a typical image, and also that of the noise. Often, we do not have access to these exact quantities, but we may be in a situation where good estimates can be made. For instance, in the case of photographic images, the signal (the original image) typically has strong low frequencies and weak high frequencies, while in many cases the noise content will be relatively flat with frequency.

Derivation

As mentioned above, we want to produce an estimate of the original signal that minimizes the mean square error, which may be expressed:

.

The equivalence to the previous definition of , can be derived using Plancherel theorem or Parseval's theorem for the Fourier transform.

If we substitute in the expression for , the above can be rearranged to

If we expand the quadratic, we get the following:

However, we are assuming that the noise is independent of the signal, therefore:

Substituting the power spectral densities and , we have:

To find the minimum error value, we calculate the Wirtinger derivative with respect to and set it equal to zero.

This final equality can be rearranged to give the Wiener filter.

See also

References

  • Rafael Gonzalez, Richard Woods, and Steven Eddins. Digital Image Processing Using Matlab. Prentice Hall, 2003.