Talk:Humberside Scout County (The Scout Association): Difference between revisions
ScoutingWikiProject |
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. (Fix Category:WikiProject banners with redundant class parameter) Tag: |
||
(17 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|1= |
|||
{{ScoutingWikiProject}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Scouting|importance=NA}} |
|||
{{WikiProject England}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Yorkshire}} |
|||
}} |
|||
{{oldafdfull|date=2006 June 20|result='''keep'''|page={{{votepage|Scouting in Humberside}}}}} |
|||
==Notability== |
|||
I have consulted with another editor - outside of Scouting. Assuming good faith, I'm afraid that I cannot see that these new sites fit in with Wikipedia as they appear effectively nothing more than a list of branches of The Scout Association. For further information on this please see the section '''Wikipedia is not a soapbox''' on [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not]], notably the section on advertising. Even when open to Groups of all Associations these pages were of suspect standard, and closing them to independent Groups has not helped in any way. |
|||
I suggest returning them to their original format, a new format that allows all Scouting in a County to be reported, or, alternatively, deleted as inappropriate. -- [[User:DiverScout|DiverScout]] ([[User talk:DiverScout|talk]]) 19:05, 1 June 2008 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:29, 26 November 2024
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 2006 June 20. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Notability
[edit]I have consulted with another editor - outside of Scouting. Assuming good faith, I'm afraid that I cannot see that these new sites fit in with Wikipedia as they appear effectively nothing more than a list of branches of The Scout Association. For further information on this please see the section Wikipedia is not a soapbox on Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, notably the section on advertising. Even when open to Groups of all Associations these pages were of suspect standard, and closing them to independent Groups has not helped in any way.
I suggest returning them to their original format, a new format that allows all Scouting in a County to be reported, or, alternatively, deleted as inappropriate. -- DiverScout (talk) 19:05, 1 June 2008 (UTC)