Jump to content

Phantasm II: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→Plot: Trimming the summary
m Disambiguating links to Universal Studios (link changed to Universal Pictures) using DisamAssist.
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 37: Line 37:
Seven years later, in 1986, the now 19-year old Mike has been institutionalized, and fakes recovery to get released. That night, he visits Morningside Cemetery, and exhumed the graves. Reggie shows up, trying to convince him that his experiences with the Tall Man were not real. However, Mike reveals the coffins are all empty, and asks Reggie to help hunt down the Tall Man. Reaching Reggie's house, Mike has a premonition where the Tall Man sets off an explosion that kills Reggie's family, seconds before it occurs. After the funeral, a convinced Reggie agrees to accompany Mike. Gathering supplies and weapons, they hit the road, discovering abandoned towns, pillaged graveyards left in the Tall Man's wake, and even a few of his traps; including the appreciation of a naked woman. A gruesome encounter with a creature resembling Liz leads them to the town of Perigord, [[Oregon]].
Seven years later, in 1986, the now 19-year old Mike has been institutionalized, and fakes recovery to get released. That night, he visits Morningside Cemetery, and exhumed the graves. Reggie shows up, trying to convince him that his experiences with the Tall Man were not real. However, Mike reveals the coffins are all empty, and asks Reggie to help hunt down the Tall Man. Reaching Reggie's house, Mike has a premonition where the Tall Man sets off an explosion that kills Reggie's family, seconds before it occurs. After the funeral, a convinced Reggie agrees to accompany Mike. Gathering supplies and weapons, they hit the road, discovering abandoned towns, pillaged graveyards left in the Tall Man's wake, and even a few of his traps; including the appreciation of a naked woman. A gruesome encounter with a creature resembling Liz leads them to the town of Perigord, [[Oregon]].


Liz's grandfather dies, and her sister Jeri disappears during the funeral. Searching for Jeri, Liz escapes an encounter with the Tall Man and flees. The presiding priest, Father Meyers, maddened with fear, the reanimation of Liz's grandfather using a knife, but the corpse rises and kidnaps Liz's grandmother. The following, Liz finds a funeral pin in her grandmother's empty bed, and the Tall Man psychically tells Liz to return at night if she wants to rescue her grandmother. Meanwhile, Reggie picks up a hitchhiker named Alchemy, who eerily resembles the nude apparition. They find Perigord deserted and dilapidated. Liz arrives at the mortuary, where she encounters Father Meyers, who attempts to convince her to escape with him. Meyers is killed by one of the Tall Man's spheres, and Liz encounters the Tall Man himself; who converted her grandmother into one of his Lurkers. Liz manages to escape, and finally meets Mike in the cemetery.
Liz's grandfather dies, and her sister Jeri disappears during the funeral. Searching for Jeri, Liz escapes an encounter with the Tall Man and flees. The presiding priest, Father Meyers, maddened with fear, the reanimation of Liz's grandfather using a knife, but the corpse rises and kidnaps Liz's grandmother. The following, Liz finds a funeral pin in her grandmother's empty bed, and the Tall Man psychically tells Liz to return at night if she wants to rescue her grandmother. Meanwhile, Reggie picks up a hitchhiker named Alchemy, who eerily resembles the nude apparition. They find Perigord deserted and dilapidated. Liz arrives at the mortuary, where she encounters Father Meyers, who attempts to convince her to escape with him. Meyers is killed by one of the Tall Man's spheres, and Liz encounters the Tall Man himself; who converted her grandmother into one of his Lurkers. Liz manages to escape, and finally meets Mike in the cemetery.


That night, the Tall Man abducts Liz in his hearse, before Mike and Reggie give chase. Liz is taken to the furnace room in the crematorium by the Tall Man's mortician assistants, but she escapes, sending one into the furnace. Mike and Reggie break into the mortuary and find the embalming room. While Reggie pours acid into the embalming fluid, Mike discovers a dimensional portal that requires a sphere to open. When they split, Reggie searches the basement, where he fights a Graver and several Lurkers with a chainsaw and quadruple shotgun; Reggie castrates the Graver to death and guns down the Lurkers. Mike saves Liz from a silver sphere which subdues the other mortician. A larger, gold sphere emerges and begins to chase Mike and Liz. The surviving mortician manages to escape by cutting off his own hand.
That night, the Tall Man abducts Liz in his hearse, before Mike and Reggie give chase. Liz is taken to the furnace room in the crematorium by the Tall Man's mortician assistants, but she escapes, sending one into the furnace. Mike and Reggie break into the mortuary and find the embalming room. While Reggie pours acid into the embalming fluid, Mike discovers a dimensional portal that requires a sphere to open. When they split, Reggie searches the basement, where he fights a Graver and several Lurkers with a chainsaw and quadruple shotgun; Reggie castrates the Graver to death and guns down the Lurkers. Mike saves Liz from a silver sphere which subdues the other mortician. A larger, gold sphere emerges and begins to chase Mike and Liz. The surviving mortician manages to escape by cutting off his own hand.


Dodging the gold sphere's advanced arsenal - including scanners, lasers, and spinning blades - Mike and Liz barricade themselves in the parlor. The surviving mortician assistant returns and almost kills Liz before the gold sphere blasts through the door and kills him with a buzz saw. Liz, Mike, and Reggie reunite and use the still embedded silver sphere to access the portal. Before they can destroy the building, they face the Tall Man, and pump him full of the acid-contaminated embalming fluid, which causes him to melt. 
Dodging the gold sphere's advanced arsenal - including scanners, lasers, and spinning blades - Mike and Liz barricade themselves in the parlor. The surviving mortician assistant returns and almost kills Liz before the gold sphere blasts through the door and kills him with a buzz saw. Liz, Mike, and Reggie reunite and use the still embedded silver sphere to access the portal. Before they can destroy the building, they face the Tall Man, and pump him full of the acid-contaminated embalming fluid, which causes him to melt. 

The trio escape the building after setting it on fire. They're greeted by Alchemy, who has procured an abandoned hearse. As they ride off, Alchemy reveals herself to not be human, and the hearse swerves wildly, then stops, ejecting Reggie. Mike and Liz, trapped in the hearse, try to convince themselves that they're dreaming, but the slot to the driver's cabin opens, revealing the Tall Man. Hands break the rear window and pull Mike and Liz through.
The trio escape the building after setting it on fire. They're greeted by Alchemy, who has procured an abandoned hearse. As they ride off, Alchemy reveals herself to not be human, and the hearse swerves wildly, then stops, ejecting Reggie. Mike and Liz, trapped in the hearse, try to convince themselves that they're dreaming, but the slot to the driver's cabin opens, revealing the Tall Man. Hands break the rear window and pull Mike and Liz through.


Line 62: Line 63:


==Production==
==Production==
Writer-director Don Coscarelli says that he had been under pressure to film a sequel, but could not come up with a story. Coscarelli considered the first film's ending to be conclusive, and did not feel knowledgeable about writing sequels, but he had what he described as a breakthrough when he realized he could start the film immediately after the previous film's final scene. He also added a [[road movie]] element in how Reggie and Mike combat the Tall Man, after which he described the process as straightforward.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://creativescreenwriting.com/phantasm-remastering-a-classic/|title=Phantasm: Remastering a Classic|last=Miller|first=Donna Marie|date=2016-04-14|publisher=Creative Screenwriting|access-date=2016-04-14}}</ref> [[Universal Studios]], who took an interest in the film because they wanted a horror series, allocated three million dollars; this was the lowest budget of any of their films in the 1980s, but it was the highest budget of any ''Phantasm'' film. [[Greg Nicotero]] and [[Robert Kurtzman]], later of K.N.B. EFX, were recruited for special effects.<ref name=savlov>{{cite news|last=Savlov|first=Marc|title=Sphere of Influence|url=http://www.austinchronicle.com/screens/2000-03-31/76665/|access-date=2013-08-08|newspaper=[[Austin Chronicle]]|date=2000-03-31}}</ref> The studio exerted much control over the film, and they did not allow Coscarelli to include any dream sequences or ambiguity.<ref name=fortean>{{cite journal|last=Sutton|first=David|title=Don Coscarelli|journal=[[Fortean Times]]|year=2006|url=http://www.forteantimes.com/features/interviews/116/don_coscarelli.html|access-date=2013-08-11|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131105114832/http://www.forteantimes.com/features/interviews/116/don_coscarelli.html|archive-date=2013-11-05}}</ref>
Writer-director Don Coscarelli says that he had been under pressure to film a sequel, but could not come up with a story. Coscarelli considered the first film's ending to be conclusive, and did not feel knowledgeable about writing sequels, but he had what he described as a breakthrough when he realized he could start the film immediately after the previous film's final scene. He also added a [[road movie]] element in how Reggie and Mike combat the Tall Man, after which he described the process as straightforward.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://creativescreenwriting.com/phantasm-remastering-a-classic/|title=Phantasm: Remastering a Classic|last=Miller|first=Donna Marie|date=2016-04-14|publisher=Creative Screenwriting|access-date=2016-04-14}}</ref> [[Universal Pictures|Universal Studios]], who took an interest in the film because they wanted a horror series, allocated three million dollars; this was the lowest budget of any of their films in the 1980s, but it was the highest budget of any ''Phantasm'' film. [[Greg Nicotero]] and [[Robert Kurtzman]], later of K.N.B. EFX, were recruited for special effects.<ref name=savlov>{{cite news|last=Savlov|first=Marc|title=Sphere of Influence|url=http://www.austinchronicle.com/screens/2000-03-31/76665/|access-date=2013-08-08|newspaper=[[Austin Chronicle]]|date=2000-03-31}}</ref> The studio exerted much control over the film, and they did not allow Coscarelli to include any dream sequences or ambiguity.<ref name=fortean>{{cite journal|last=Sutton|first=David|title=Don Coscarelli|journal=[[Fortean Times]]|year=2006|url=http://www.forteantimes.com/features/interviews/116/don_coscarelli.html|access-date=2013-08-11|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131105114832/http://www.forteantimes.com/features/interviews/116/don_coscarelli.html|archive-date=2013-11-05}}</ref>


This is the only installment in the ''Phantasm'' series that does not include the entire original main cast (Bill Thornbury and his character did not appear in this film), and the only one to re-cast a main character with another actor. Universal forced Coscarelli to recast the character of Mike, as they wanted a working actor.<ref name=fortean/> In an interview, Bannister said that LeGros' casting was initially controversial among hardcore fans, but has become more accepted.<ref>{{cite book|title=More Giants of the Genre|first1=Cristopher|last1=Hennessey|first2=Michael|last2=McCarty|publisher=[[Wildside Press]]|isbn=9787770047060|pages=83–84|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zOFEZr0ykk0C&pg=PA83|access-date=2013-08-08|chapter=The Phantasm Man|date=12 July 2023 }}</ref> [[Brad Pitt]] auditioned for the role of Mike Pearson.<ref>{{cite magazine|last=Collins|first=Clark|title=Brad Pitt once auditioned to star in a Phantasm film|url=https://ew.com/movies/2018/10/01/brad-pitt-phantasm/|magazine=[[Entertainment Weekly]]|date=October 1, 2018|access-date=October 12, 2021}}</ref>
This is the only installment in the ''Phantasm'' series that does not include the entire original main cast (Bill Thornbury and his character did not appear in this film), and the only one to re-cast a main character with another actor. Universal forced Coscarelli to recast the character of Mike, as they wanted a working actor.<ref name=fortean/> In an interview, Bannister said that LeGros' casting was initially controversial among hardcore fans, but has become more accepted.<ref>{{cite book|title=More Giants of the Genre|first1=Cristopher|last1=Hennessey|first2=Michael|last2=McCarty|publisher=[[Wildside Press]]|isbn=9787770047060|pages=83–84|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zOFEZr0ykk0C&pg=PA83|access-date=2013-08-08|chapter=The Phantasm Man|date=12 July 2023 }}</ref> [[Brad Pitt]] auditioned for the role of Mike Pearson.<ref>{{cite magazine|last=Collins|first=Clark|title=Brad Pitt once auditioned to star in a Phantasm film|url=https://ew.com/movies/2018/10/01/brad-pitt-phantasm/|magazine=[[Entertainment Weekly]]|date=October 1, 2018|access-date=October 12, 2021}}</ref>
Line 74: Line 75:
On [[Rotten Tomatoes]], 38% of 16 surveyed critics gave the film a positive review, and the average rating is 4.80/10.<ref>{{cite web |title=Phantasm II |url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/phantasm_2/ |work=[[Rotten Tomatoes]] |access-date=2022-04-03 }}</ref> On [[Metacritic]] the film has a score of 42% based on reviews from nine critics, indicating "mixed or average reviews".<ref>{{cite web |title=Phantasm II |url=https://www.metacritic.com/movie/phantasm-ii |website=[[Metacritic]] |access-date=2021-01-01 }}</ref>
On [[Rotten Tomatoes]], 38% of 16 surveyed critics gave the film a positive review, and the average rating is 4.80/10.<ref>{{cite web |title=Phantasm II |url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/phantasm_2/ |work=[[Rotten Tomatoes]] |access-date=2022-04-03 }}</ref> On [[Metacritic]] the film has a score of 42% based on reviews from nine critics, indicating "mixed or average reviews".<ref>{{cite web |title=Phantasm II |url=https://www.metacritic.com/movie/phantasm-ii |website=[[Metacritic]] |access-date=2021-01-01 }}</ref>


In a negative review, [[Roger Ebert]] rated the film one out of four stars, and likened it to an extended dream without logic or a coherent plot, full of nightmarish images and no character development.<ref>{{cite web|last=Ebert|first=Roger|author-link=Roger Ebert|title=Phantasm II|url=https://rogerebert.com/reviews/phantasm-ii-1988|work=RogerEbert.com|access-date=2013-08-08|date=1988-07-08}}</ref> ''[[Time Out (magazine)|Time Out]]'' also said that "the only valid reason for seeing this belated sequel is that it goes some way towards explaining the incomprehensible plot of its predecessor."<ref>{{cite journal|title=Phantasm II|journal=[[Time Out (magazine)|Time Out London]]|date=10 September 2012 |url=https://timeout.com/london/film/phantasm-ii|access-date=2013-08-08}}</ref> ''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]'' called the film "an utterly unredeeming, full-gore sequel" and "incredibly morbid and meaningless".<ref>{{cite journal|title=Phantasm II|author=Variety Staff|journal=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]|year=1988|url=https://variety.com/1987/film/reviews/phantasm-ii-1200427499/|access-date=2013-08-08}}</ref> Carrie Rickey of the ''[[Philadelphia Inquirer]]'' described the film as "a series of apparently unrelated horrors visited upon good-looking blond people" and criticized the gore.<ref>{{cite news|last=Rickey|first=Carrie|title=On The Cutting Edge Of Mutilation|url=http://articles.philly.com/1988-07-08/entertainment/26236098_1_don-coscarelli-dismemberment-reggie-bannister|access-date=2013-08-11|newspaper=[[Philadelphia Inquirer]]|date=1988-07-08|archive-date=2016-04-13|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160413205738/http://articles.philly.com/1988-07-08/entertainment/26236098_1_don-coscarelli-dismemberment-reggie-bannister|url-status=dead}}</ref> Roger Hurlburt of the ''[[Sun-Sentinel]]'' criticized LeGros' acting and called the film a waste of time.<ref>{{cite news|last=Hurlburt|first=Roger|title=Gore Sequel a Horrifying Waste of Time|url=http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/1988-07-08/features/8802100014_1_reggie-bannister-coscarelli-tall-man|access-date=2013-08-15|newspaper=[[Sun-Sentinel]]|date=1988-07-08}}</ref> Writing in ''[[The New York Times]]'', Caryn James stated that "there are some grotesquely stylish and scary moments" but they "seem to take as long to arrive as the sequel did."<ref>{{cite news|last=James|first=Caryn|title=Phantasm II (1988)|newspaper=[[New York Times]]|date=1988-07-08}}</ref> Kevin Thomas of the ''Los Angeles Times'' called the film "a fast, entertaining fright show" but needlessly literal and gratuitous, as the film series transforms from a surreal thriller to a trite horror film.<ref>{{cite news|last=Thomas|first=Kevin|title=MOVIE REVIEW : 'Phantasm II' Takes Its Horror More Literally Than Predecessor|url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1988-07-08-ca-6550-story.html|access-date=2013-08-08|newspaper=[[Los Angeles Times]]|date=1988-07-08}}</ref> In a positive review, [[Dave Kehr]] of the ''[[Chicago Tribune]]'' stated that "Coscarelli has captured the texture of a disjointed, half-remembered nightmare" and likens it to the 1920s [[surrealism|surrealist]] film movement.<ref>{{cite news|last=Kehr|first=Dave|title='Phantasm II' Sequel Worth A Second Look|url=http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1988-07-08/entertainment/8801130543_1_coscarelli-phantasm-ii-paula-irvine|access-date=2013-08-11|newspaper=[[Chicago Tribune]]|date=1988-07-08|author-link=Dave Kehr}}</ref> The ''[[Philadelphia Daily News]]''{{'}} Amy Alexander said the film "has all the elements of a classic serial horror film" and praised the special effects.<ref>{{cite news|last=Alexander|first=Amy|title=Phantasm II|url=http://articles.philly.com/1988-07-08/news/26234878_1_don-coscarelli-reggie-bannister-phantasm-ii|access-date=2013-08-15|newspaper=[[Philadelphia Daily News]]|date=1988-07-08}}</ref>
In a negative review, [[Roger Ebert]] rated the film one out of four stars, and likened it to an extended dream without logic or a coherent plot, full of nightmarish images and no character development.<ref>{{cite web|last=Ebert|first=Roger|author-link=Roger Ebert|title=Phantasm II|url=https://rogerebert.com/reviews/phantasm-ii-1988|work=RogerEbert.com|access-date=2013-08-08|date=1988-07-08}}</ref> ''[[Time Out (magazine)|Time Out]]'' also said that "the only valid reason for seeing this belated sequel is that it goes some way towards explaining the incomprehensible plot of its predecessor."<ref>{{cite journal|title=Phantasm II|journal=[[Time Out (magazine)|Time Out London]]|date=10 September 2012 |url=https://timeout.com/london/film/phantasm-ii|access-date=2013-08-08}}</ref> ''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]'' called the film "an utterly unredeeming, full-gore sequel" and "incredibly morbid and meaningless".<ref>{{cite journal|title=Phantasm II|author=Variety Staff|journal=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]|year=1988|url=https://variety.com/1987/film/reviews/phantasm-ii-1200427499/|access-date=2013-08-08}}</ref> Carrie Rickey of the ''[[Philadelphia Inquirer]]'' described the film as "a series of apparently unrelated horrors visited upon good-looking blond people" and criticized the gore.<ref>{{cite news|last=Rickey|first=Carrie|title=On The Cutting Edge Of Mutilation|url=http://articles.philly.com/1988-07-08/entertainment/26236098_1_don-coscarelli-dismemberment-reggie-bannister|access-date=2013-08-11|newspaper=[[Philadelphia Inquirer]]|date=1988-07-08|archive-date=2016-04-13|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160413205738/http://articles.philly.com/1988-07-08/entertainment/26236098_1_don-coscarelli-dismemberment-reggie-bannister|url-status=dead}}</ref> Roger Hurlburt of the ''[[Sun-Sentinel]]'' criticized LeGros' acting and called the film a waste of time.<ref>{{cite news|last=Hurlburt|first=Roger|title=Gore Sequel a Horrifying Waste of Time|url=http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/1988-07-08/features/8802100014_1_reggie-bannister-coscarelli-tall-man|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130730174514/http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/1988-07-08/features/8802100014_1_reggie-bannister-coscarelli-tall-man|url-status=dead|archive-date=July 30, 2013|access-date=2013-08-15|newspaper=[[Sun-Sentinel]]|date=1988-07-08}}</ref> Writing in ''[[The New York Times]]'', Caryn James stated that "there are some grotesquely stylish and scary moments" but they "seem to take as long to arrive as the sequel did."<ref>{{cite news|last=James|first=Caryn|title=Phantasm II (1988)|newspaper=[[New York Times]]|date=1988-07-08}}</ref> Kevin Thomas of the ''Los Angeles Times'' called the film "a fast, entertaining fright show" but needlessly literal and gratuitous, as the film series transforms from a surreal thriller to a trite horror film.<ref>{{cite news|last=Thomas|first=Kevin|title=MOVIE REVIEW : 'Phantasm II' Takes Its Horror More Literally Than Predecessor|url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1988-07-08-ca-6550-story.html|access-date=2013-08-08|newspaper=[[Los Angeles Times]]|date=1988-07-08}}</ref> In a positive review, [[Dave Kehr]] of the ''[[Chicago Tribune]]'' stated that "Coscarelli has captured the texture of a disjointed, half-remembered nightmare" and likens it to the 1920s [[surrealism|surrealist]] film movement.<ref>{{cite news|last=Kehr|first=Dave|title='Phantasm II' Sequel Worth A Second Look|url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/1988/07/08/phantasm-ii-sequel-worth-a-second-look/|access-date=2013-08-11|newspaper=[[Chicago Tribune]]|date=1988-07-08|author-link=Dave Kehr}}</ref> The ''[[Philadelphia Daily News]]''{{'}} Amy Alexander said the film "has all the elements of a classic serial horror film" and praised the special effects.<ref>{{cite news|last=Alexander|first=Amy|title=Phantasm II|url=http://articles.philly.com/1988-07-08/news/26234878_1_don-coscarelli-reggie-bannister-phantasm-ii|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130925132934/http://articles.philly.com/1988-07-08/news/26234878_1_don-coscarelli-reggie-bannister-phantasm-ii|url-status=dead|archive-date=September 25, 2013|access-date=2013-08-15|newspaper=[[Philadelphia Daily News]]|date=1988-07-08}}</ref>


Some critics reviewed the film on home video. Scott Weinberg of [[Fearnet]] called the ''Phantasm'' sequels indecipherable and too weird to understand, though he recommends ''Phantasm II'' to fans of the original.<ref>{{cite web|last=Weinberg|first=Scott|title=FEARnet Movie Review: 'Phantasm 2' Blu-Ray|url=http://www.fearnet.com/news/review/fearnet-movie-review-phantasm-2-blu-ray|work=[[Fearnet]]|access-date=2013-08-08|date=2013-05-02}}</ref> Scott Tobias of ''[[The A.V. Club]]'' rated the film a B and wrote of the [[cult film|cult appeal]].<ref>{{cite web|last=Tobias|first=Scott|title=Phantasm II|url=https://avclub.com/articles/phantasm-ii,95489/|work=[[The A.V. Club]]|access-date=2013-08-08|date=2013-03-27}}</ref> Matt Serafini of ''[[Dread Central]]'' rated the film four out of five, but criticized the more realistic approach taken in favor of the surrealism of the first film.<ref>{{cite web|last=Serafini|first=Matt|title=Phantasm II (DVD) Review|url=https://dreadcentral.com/reviews/phantasm-ii-dvd|work=[[DreadCentral]]|access-date=2013-08-08|date=2009-10-28}}</ref> ''[[Bloody Disgusting]]'' rated the film three-and-a-half out of five, but said that the film seems dated now and does not quite live up to its nostalgic value.<ref>{{cite web|title=Phantasm II|url=https://bloody-disgusting.com/reviews/113723/phantasm-ii-2/|work=[[Bloody Disgusting]]|access-date=2013-08-08|author=Bloody Disgusting Staff|date=2009-10-12}}</ref> Andy Klein of the ''[[Glendale News-Press]]'' cited the film's weirdness and creepiness as making up for breaking the rules of what makes a good horror film.<ref>{{cite news|last=Klein|first=Andy|title=DVD Review: 'Phantasm' sequel comes scary with extras|url=http://articles.glendalenewspress.com/2013-03-08/entertainment/tn-gnp-0308-dvd-review-phantasm-sequel-comes-scary-with-extras_1_reggie-bannister-phantasm-ii-dvd-review|access-date=2013-08-08|newspaper=[[Glendale News-Press]]|date=2013-03-08}}</ref> Marco Lanzagorta of ''[[PopMatters]]'' rated it ten out of ten stars, and wrote: "The narrative of ''Phantasm II'' may sound absurd and ridiculous, but the feelings of dread and anxiety that we get while we watch it are very real."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://popmatters.com/review/170600-phantasm-ii-collectors-edition/|title=The Ball Is Back, But Is It Real? 'Phantasm II (Collector's Edition)'|last=Lanzagorta|first=Marco|work=[[PopMatters]]|date=2013-04-24|access-date=2015-04-06}}</ref> [[UGO]] included ''Phantasm II'' in its list of ''Surprisingly Decent Horror Sequels'' and called it a "sturdy continuation".<ref>{{cite web|title=Surprisingly Decent Horror Sequels|url=http://www.ugo.com/movies/surprisingly-decent-horror-sequels?page=2|date=2010-04-10|work=[[UGO]]|access-date=2013-08-15|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://archive.today/20130815051845/http://www.ugo.com/movies/surprisingly-decent-horror-sequels?page=2|archive-date=2013-08-15}}</ref>
Some critics reviewed the film on home video. Scott Weinberg of [[Fearnet]] called the ''Phantasm'' sequels indecipherable and too weird to understand, though he recommends ''Phantasm II'' to fans of the original.<ref>{{cite web|last=Weinberg|first=Scott|title=FEARnet Movie Review: 'Phantasm 2' Blu-Ray|url=http://www.fearnet.com/news/review/fearnet-movie-review-phantasm-2-blu-ray|work=[[Fearnet]]|access-date=2013-08-08|date=2013-05-02}}</ref> Scott Tobias of ''[[The A.V. Club]]'' rated the film a B and wrote of the [[cult film|cult appeal]].<ref>{{cite web|last=Tobias|first=Scott|title=Phantasm II|url=https://www.avclub.com/phantasm-ii-1798176252|work=[[The A.V. Club]]|access-date=2013-08-08|date=2013-03-27}}</ref> Matt Serafini of ''[[Dread Central]]'' rated the film four out of five, but criticized the more realistic approach taken in favor of the surrealism of the first film.<ref>{{cite web|last=Serafini|first=Matt|title=Phantasm II (DVD) Review|url=https://dreadcentral.com/reviews/phantasm-ii-dvd|work=[[DreadCentral]]|access-date=2013-08-08|date=2009-10-28}}</ref> ''[[Bloody Disgusting]]'' rated the film three-and-a-half out of five, but said that the film seems dated now and does not quite live up to its nostalgic value.<ref>{{cite web|title=Phantasm II|url=https://bloody-disgusting.com/reviews/113723/phantasm-ii-2/|work=[[Bloody Disgusting]]|access-date=2013-08-08|author=Bloody Disgusting Staff|date=2009-10-12}}</ref> Andy Klein of the ''[[Glendale News-Press]]'' cited the film's weirdness and creepiness as making up for breaking the rules of what makes a good horror film.<ref>{{cite news|last=Klein|first=Andy|title=DVD Review: 'Phantasm' sequel comes scary with extras|url=http://articles.glendalenewspress.com/2013-03-08/entertainment/tn-gnp-0308-dvd-review-phantasm-sequel-comes-scary-with-extras_1_reggie-bannister-phantasm-ii-dvd-review|access-date=2013-08-08|newspaper=[[Glendale News-Press]]|date=2013-03-08}}</ref> Marco Lanzagorta of ''[[PopMatters]]'' rated it ten out of ten stars, and wrote: "The narrative of ''Phantasm II'' may sound absurd and ridiculous, but the feelings of dread and anxiety that we get while we watch it are very real."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://popmatters.com/review/170600-phantasm-ii-collectors-edition/|title=The Ball Is Back, But Is It Real? 'Phantasm II (Collector's Edition)'|last=Lanzagorta|first=Marco|work=[[PopMatters]]|date=2013-04-24|access-date=2015-04-06}}</ref> [[UGO]] included ''Phantasm II'' in its list of ''Surprisingly Decent Horror Sequels'' and called it a "sturdy continuation".<ref>{{cite web|title=Surprisingly Decent Horror Sequels|url=http://www.ugo.com/movies/surprisingly-decent-horror-sequels?page=2|date=2010-04-10|work=[[UGO]]|access-date=2013-08-15|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://archive.today/20130815051845/http://www.ugo.com/movies/surprisingly-decent-horror-sequels?page=2|archive-date=2013-08-15}}</ref>


==References==
==References==
Line 108: Line 109:
[[Category:1980s English-language films]]
[[Category:1980s English-language films]]
[[Category:1988 science fiction films]]
[[Category:1988 science fiction films]]
[[Category:English-language science fiction horror films]]
[[Category:English-language fantasy films]]

Latest revision as of 19:12, 26 November 2024

Phantasm II
Theatrical release poster
Directed byDon Coscarelli
Written byDon Coscarelli
Produced byRoberto A. Quezada
Starring
CinematographyDaryn Okada
Edited byPeter Teschner
Music by
Distributed byUniversal Pictures
Release date
  • July 8, 1988 (1988-07-08)[1]
Running time
97 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Budget$3 million[2]
Box office$7.3 million (US)[1]

Phantasm II is a 1988 American science fantasy action-horror film and the sequel to Phantasm (1979). It was written and directed by Don Coscarelli and stars Angus Scrimm, James LeGros and Reggie Bannister. The first film's protagonist, Mike, recently released from a mental institution, recruits Reggie and some new friends in an effort to defeat the villain Tall Man.

The film caused controversy among fans by recasting main character Mike with LeGros, and was not well received by critics. It was followed by two direct-to-video sequels: Phantasm III: Lord of the Dead (1994) and Phantasm IV: Oblivion (1998) as well as the final film in the Phantasm series: Phantasm: Ravager (2016), which received a theatrical release. Following distribution problems in the U.S., Phantasm II was released in Region 1 on DVD in 2009 and Blu-ray disc in 2013.

Plot

[edit]

Liz Reynolds is a young woman whose psychic bond to Mike Pearson and the Tall Man manifests in the form of prophetic nightmares. Through this link, Liz pleads for Mike to find her, fearing that when her grandfather dies, the Tall Man will take him. Transitioning to where the first film left off, the Tall Man and his minions attempt to kidnap Mike, however Reggie manages to save him by blowing up the house.

Seven years later, in 1986, the now 19-year old Mike has been institutionalized, and fakes recovery to get released. That night, he visits Morningside Cemetery, and exhumed the graves. Reggie shows up, trying to convince him that his experiences with the Tall Man were not real. However, Mike reveals the coffins are all empty, and asks Reggie to help hunt down the Tall Man. Reaching Reggie's house, Mike has a premonition where the Tall Man sets off an explosion that kills Reggie's family, seconds before it occurs. After the funeral, a convinced Reggie agrees to accompany Mike. Gathering supplies and weapons, they hit the road, discovering abandoned towns, pillaged graveyards left in the Tall Man's wake, and even a few of his traps; including the appreciation of a naked woman. A gruesome encounter with a creature resembling Liz leads them to the town of Perigord, Oregon.

Liz's grandfather dies, and her sister Jeri disappears during the funeral. Searching for Jeri, Liz escapes an encounter with the Tall Man and flees. The presiding priest, Father Meyers, maddened with fear, the reanimation of Liz's grandfather using a knife, but the corpse rises and kidnaps Liz's grandmother. The following, Liz finds a funeral pin in her grandmother's empty bed, and the Tall Man psychically tells Liz to return at night if she wants to rescue her grandmother. Meanwhile, Reggie picks up a hitchhiker named Alchemy, who eerily resembles the nude apparition. They find Perigord deserted and dilapidated. Liz arrives at the mortuary, where she encounters Father Meyers, who attempts to convince her to escape with him. Meyers is killed by one of the Tall Man's spheres, and Liz encounters the Tall Man himself; who converted her grandmother into one of his Lurkers. Liz manages to escape, and finally meets Mike in the cemetery.

That night, the Tall Man abducts Liz in his hearse, before Mike and Reggie give chase. Liz is taken to the furnace room in the crematorium by the Tall Man's mortician assistants, but she escapes, sending one into the furnace. Mike and Reggie break into the mortuary and find the embalming room. While Reggie pours acid into the embalming fluid, Mike discovers a dimensional portal that requires a sphere to open. When they split, Reggie searches the basement, where he fights a Graver and several Lurkers with a chainsaw and quadruple shotgun; Reggie castrates the Graver to death and guns down the Lurkers. Mike saves Liz from a silver sphere which subdues the other mortician. A larger, gold sphere emerges and begins to chase Mike and Liz. The surviving mortician manages to escape by cutting off his own hand.

Dodging the gold sphere's advanced arsenal - including scanners, lasers, and spinning blades - Mike and Liz barricade themselves in the parlor. The surviving mortician assistant returns and almost kills Liz before the gold sphere blasts through the door and kills him with a buzz saw. Liz, Mike, and Reggie reunite and use the still embedded silver sphere to access the portal. Before they can destroy the building, they face the Tall Man, and pump him full of the acid-contaminated embalming fluid, which causes him to melt. 

The trio escape the building after setting it on fire. They're greeted by Alchemy, who has procured an abandoned hearse. As they ride off, Alchemy reveals herself to not be human, and the hearse swerves wildly, then stops, ejecting Reggie. Mike and Liz, trapped in the hearse, try to convince themselves that they're dreaming, but the slot to the driver's cabin opens, revealing the Tall Man. Hands break the rear window and pull Mike and Liz through.

Cast

[edit]

Themes

[edit]

John Kenneth Muir states that, like many horror films of the 1980s, Phantasm II shifted its focus to guns. Sequels in the 1980s were required to be bigger, gorier and have more firepower than previous installments. The theme of "bigger is better" means that everything is upgraded: a quadruple shotgun, golden spheres with increased weaponry, a chainsaw duel and the nature of the Tall Man's death. Muir states that the narrative of a boy dealing with the loss of his family is unchanged, but it is approached differently: instead of the surrealism of Phantasm, it is approached in a conventional, less abstract manner.[3]

Production

[edit]

Writer-director Don Coscarelli says that he had been under pressure to film a sequel, but could not come up with a story. Coscarelli considered the first film's ending to be conclusive, and did not feel knowledgeable about writing sequels, but he had what he described as a breakthrough when he realized he could start the film immediately after the previous film's final scene. He also added a road movie element in how Reggie and Mike combat the Tall Man, after which he described the process as straightforward.[4] Universal Studios, who took an interest in the film because they wanted a horror series, allocated three million dollars; this was the lowest budget of any of their films in the 1980s, but it was the highest budget of any Phantasm film. Greg Nicotero and Robert Kurtzman, later of K.N.B. EFX, were recruited for special effects.[5] The studio exerted much control over the film, and they did not allow Coscarelli to include any dream sequences or ambiguity.[6]

This is the only installment in the Phantasm series that does not include the entire original main cast (Bill Thornbury and his character did not appear in this film), and the only one to re-cast a main character with another actor. Universal forced Coscarelli to recast the character of Mike, as they wanted a working actor.[6] In an interview, Bannister said that LeGros' casting was initially controversial among hardcore fans, but has become more accepted.[7] Brad Pitt auditioned for the role of Mike Pearson.[8]

Release

[edit]

Phantasm II was released theatrically on July 8, 1988, and played on 1227 screens.[1] It was later characterized by Pat H. Broeske of the Los Angeles Times as a box office bomb.[9] The film was released on VHS on MCA Home Video later that same year.

A Region 1 DVD was released by Universal on September 15, 2009.[10] Shout! Factory released a new collector's edition DVD and Blu-ray release under their sub-label "Scream Factory" on March 26, 2013.[11] Both the DVD and Blu-ray contain audio commentary with Don Coscarelli, Angus Scrimm and Reggie Bannister, new interviews, deleted scenes, and more.[12] The film was played at the Phantasm-ania festival in February 2013.

Reception

[edit]

On Rotten Tomatoes, 38% of 16 surveyed critics gave the film a positive review, and the average rating is 4.80/10.[13] On Metacritic the film has a score of 42% based on reviews from nine critics, indicating "mixed or average reviews".[14]

In a negative review, Roger Ebert rated the film one out of four stars, and likened it to an extended dream without logic or a coherent plot, full of nightmarish images and no character development.[15] Time Out also said that "the only valid reason for seeing this belated sequel is that it goes some way towards explaining the incomprehensible plot of its predecessor."[16] Variety called the film "an utterly unredeeming, full-gore sequel" and "incredibly morbid and meaningless".[17] Carrie Rickey of the Philadelphia Inquirer described the film as "a series of apparently unrelated horrors visited upon good-looking blond people" and criticized the gore.[18] Roger Hurlburt of the Sun-Sentinel criticized LeGros' acting and called the film a waste of time.[19] Writing in The New York Times, Caryn James stated that "there are some grotesquely stylish and scary moments" but they "seem to take as long to arrive as the sequel did."[20] Kevin Thomas of the Los Angeles Times called the film "a fast, entertaining fright show" but needlessly literal and gratuitous, as the film series transforms from a surreal thriller to a trite horror film.[21] In a positive review, Dave Kehr of the Chicago Tribune stated that "Coscarelli has captured the texture of a disjointed, half-remembered nightmare" and likens it to the 1920s surrealist film movement.[22] The Philadelphia Daily News' Amy Alexander said the film "has all the elements of a classic serial horror film" and praised the special effects.[23]

Some critics reviewed the film on home video. Scott Weinberg of Fearnet called the Phantasm sequels indecipherable and too weird to understand, though he recommends Phantasm II to fans of the original.[24] Scott Tobias of The A.V. Club rated the film a B and wrote of the cult appeal.[25] Matt Serafini of Dread Central rated the film four out of five, but criticized the more realistic approach taken in favor of the surrealism of the first film.[26] Bloody Disgusting rated the film three-and-a-half out of five, but said that the film seems dated now and does not quite live up to its nostalgic value.[27] Andy Klein of the Glendale News-Press cited the film's weirdness and creepiness as making up for breaking the rules of what makes a good horror film.[28] Marco Lanzagorta of PopMatters rated it ten out of ten stars, and wrote: "The narrative of Phantasm II may sound absurd and ridiculous, but the feelings of dread and anxiety that we get while we watch it are very real."[29] UGO included Phantasm II in its list of Surprisingly Decent Horror Sequels and called it a "sturdy continuation".[30]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c "Phantasm II". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved 2013-08-15.
  2. ^ "Phantasm II". The Numbers. Retrieved 2014-02-03.
  3. ^ Muir, John Kenneth (2013). Horror Films of the 1980s. McFarland. pp. 686–687. ISBN 9780786455010. Retrieved 2013-08-15.
  4. ^ Miller, Donna Marie (2016-04-14). "Phantasm: Remastering a Classic". Creative Screenwriting. Retrieved 2016-04-14.
  5. ^ Savlov, Marc (2000-03-31). "Sphere of Influence". Austin Chronicle. Retrieved 2013-08-08.
  6. ^ a b Sutton, David (2006). "Don Coscarelli". Fortean Times. Archived from the original on 2013-11-05. Retrieved 2013-08-11.
  7. ^ Hennessey, Cristopher; McCarty, Michael (12 July 2023). "The Phantasm Man". More Giants of the Genre. Wildside Press. pp. 83–84. ISBN 9787770047060. Retrieved 2013-08-08.
  8. ^ Collins, Clark (October 1, 2018). "Brad Pitt once auditioned to star in a Phantasm film". Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved October 12, 2021.
  9. ^ Broeske, Pat H. (1989-04-30). "Fresh Blood". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2013-08-15.
  10. ^ Cheng, Cheryl (2009-06-08). "Halloween Purchasing Guide July-October 2009". Video Business. Archived from the original on 2009-06-12. Retrieved 2013-08-08.
  11. ^ Miska, Brad (2012-12-10). "Scream Factory Dates 'From Beyond' and 'Phantasm II' Collector's Editions For Blu-ray Release!". Retrieved 2013-08-08.
  12. ^ "Phantasm II [Collector's Edition] with Exclusive Poster!". Shout! Factory. Retrieved 2013-08-08.
  13. ^ "Phantasm II". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved 2022-04-03.
  14. ^ "Phantasm II". Metacritic. Retrieved 2021-01-01.
  15. ^ Ebert, Roger (1988-07-08). "Phantasm II". RogerEbert.com. Retrieved 2013-08-08.
  16. ^ "Phantasm II". Time Out London. 10 September 2012. Retrieved 2013-08-08.
  17. ^ Variety Staff (1988). "Phantasm II". Variety. Retrieved 2013-08-08.
  18. ^ Rickey, Carrie (1988-07-08). "On The Cutting Edge Of Mutilation". Philadelphia Inquirer. Archived from the original on 2016-04-13. Retrieved 2013-08-11.
  19. ^ Hurlburt, Roger (1988-07-08). "Gore Sequel a Horrifying Waste of Time". Sun-Sentinel. Archived from the original on July 30, 2013. Retrieved 2013-08-15.
  20. ^ James, Caryn (1988-07-08). "Phantasm II (1988)". New York Times.
  21. ^ Thomas, Kevin (1988-07-08). "MOVIE REVIEW : 'Phantasm II' Takes Its Horror More Literally Than Predecessor". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2013-08-08.
  22. ^ Kehr, Dave (1988-07-08). "'Phantasm II' Sequel Worth A Second Look". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 2013-08-11.
  23. ^ Alexander, Amy (1988-07-08). "Phantasm II". Philadelphia Daily News. Archived from the original on September 25, 2013. Retrieved 2013-08-15.
  24. ^ Weinberg, Scott (2013-05-02). "FEARnet Movie Review: 'Phantasm 2' Blu-Ray". Fearnet. Retrieved 2013-08-08.
  25. ^ Tobias, Scott (2013-03-27). "Phantasm II". The A.V. Club. Retrieved 2013-08-08.
  26. ^ Serafini, Matt (2009-10-28). "Phantasm II (DVD) Review". DreadCentral. Retrieved 2013-08-08.
  27. ^ Bloody Disgusting Staff (2009-10-12). "Phantasm II". Bloody Disgusting. Retrieved 2013-08-08.
  28. ^ Klein, Andy (2013-03-08). "DVD Review: 'Phantasm' sequel comes scary with extras". Glendale News-Press. Retrieved 2013-08-08.
  29. ^ Lanzagorta, Marco (2013-04-24). "The Ball Is Back, But Is It Real? 'Phantasm II (Collector's Edition)'". PopMatters. Retrieved 2015-04-06.
  30. ^ "Surprisingly Decent Horror Sequels". UGO. 2010-04-10. Archived from the original on 2013-08-15. Retrieved 2013-08-15.
[edit]
Wikiquote has quotations related to Phantasm II.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Phantasm_II&oldid=1259729752"