Flat IP: Difference between revisions
Izzyhopemoon (talk | contribs) removes also should be also removes |
BlazeFlames (talk | contribs) m bolded the name at the start |
||
(50 intermediate revisions by 46 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|IP network architecture}} |
|||
{{Multiple issues| |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
'''Flat IP''' architecture provides a way to identify devices using symbolic names, unlike the [[hierarchy|hierarchical]] architecture such as that used in "normal" [[IP address]]es. This form of system is of more interest to mobile broadband network operators. |
|||
⚫ | |||
'''Flat IP''' is a network addressing scheme in which each device is assigned a unique identifier within a non-hierarchical address space. Unlike [[Hierarchical internetworking model|hierarchical IP]] addressing methods, Flat IP treats all devices as equal nodes, simplifying routing by eliminating the need for structured [[Subnet|subnetting]]. |
|||
Flat IP is commonly applied in mobile networks, particularly in [[LTE (telecommunication)|LTE]], due to its efficiency in managing device handovers between network cells. The approach allows each device to be directly accessed through its unique identifier, improving routing efficiency and reducing latency in mobile environments. |
|||
While Flat IP may streamline network design for certain applications, it can present scalability challenges in larger networks. The scheme requires a substantial pool of unique identifiers and lacks a [[Hierarchy|structured hierarchy]], potentially reducing efficiency for large-scale networks compared to traditional IP models. Nonetheless, Flat IP is a practical choice in scenarios where simplicity and direct device access are priorities. |
|||
==Flat IP architecture== |
==Flat IP architecture== |
||
This [[Computer architecture|architecture]] is suitable for small businesses, home networks, and mobile broadband network operators because it simplifies [[Network monitoring|network management]] and provides a direct link for real-time data applications.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Tripathy |first=Susnigdha |date=2023-02-21 |title=What Is a Flat Network? Definition, Benefits & How It Works |url=https://www.enterprisenetworkingplanet.com/management/the-risks-and-rewards-of-flat-networks/ |access-date=2024-09-26 |website=Enterprise Networking Planet |language=en-US}}</ref> |
|||
To meet customer demand for real-time data applications delivered over mobile broadband networks, wireless operators are turning to flat IP network architectures.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The 5th Generation Mobile Wireless Networks- Key Concepts, Network Architecture and Challenges |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274417331_The_5th_Generation_Mobile_Wireless_Networks-_Key_Concepts_Network_Architecture_and_Challenges}}</ref> |
|||
=== Overview === |
|||
Wireless operators use Flat IP architecture to address the growing need for real-time data applications delivered over mobile broadband networks. This approach moves away from traditional [[Hierarchy|hierarchical]] network designs, favoring a simplified, horizontal structure. |
|||
=== Benefits of Flat IP Architecture === |
|||
Flat IP architectures offer several advantages, including: |
|||
# Cost Efficiency: Flat IP networks reduce reliance on specialized network hardware, such as ATM switches and [[Multiprotocol Label Switching|MPLS routers]], by utilizing a single level of communication. This approach lowers both hardware and maintenance costs. |
|||
# Improved Scalability and Flexibility: The absence of hierarchical layers simplifies the integration of new devices and services, benefiting mobile network operators in rapidly changing technological environments. |
|||
# Reduced Latency: By minimizing network layers and simplifying packet processing, flat IP architectures support latency-sensitive applications, such as Voice over IP (VoIP) and video streaming.<ref name=":0" /> |
|||
In mobile networks, centralized anchors act as performance bottlenecks. Flat, distributed architectures avoid this by not having centralized components, thereby reducing latency and allowing for scalability and flexibility.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Bokor |first1=László |last2=Faigl |first2=Zoltán |last3=Imre |first3=Sándor |title=Flat Architectures: Towards Scalable Future Internet Mobility |date=2011 |publisher=Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg |isbn=978-3-642-20898-0 |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20898-0_3 |access-date=25 November 2024 |ref=flat_arch}}</ref> |
|||
=== Drawbacks and Challenges === |
|||
Despite their benefits, Flat IP architectures present several challenges: |
|||
# Lack of Redundancy: Flat networks rely on a single switch or point of failure, making them vulnerable to outages if that switch fails. |
|||
;The key benefits of flat IP architectures are: |
|||
# Difficult Troubleshooting: The simplicity of flat networks can complicate troubleshooting. With fewer hierarchical layers to isolate issues, identifying the root cause of network problems can be time-consuming. |
|||
*lower costs |
|||
# Increased Security Risks: Flat networks are more vulnerable to lateral attacks, where malware or intrusions can spread quickly between devices without traditional segmentation. |
|||
*reduced system latency |
|||
*decoupled radio access and core network evolution |
|||
=== Use Cases of Flat IP Architecture === |
|||
;Key players in recognizing these advantages are: |
|||
Flat IP architecture is particularly relevant to mobile networks and is supported by several industry standards organizations, including: |
|||
*Mobile Networks |
|||
*3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) |
|||
*3GPP2 standards organizations |
|||
*[[WiMAX]] Forum. |
|||
# 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) and 3GPP2: These organizations develop global standards for mobile telecommunication systems and have adopted flat IP principles in their network designs. |
|||
;Key considerations of Flat IP Architectures for Mobile Networks include: |
|||
# [[WiMAX]] Forum: The WiMAX Forum, responsible for promoting and certifying wireless broadband technologies, was one of the early adopters of IP-centric mobile networks. |
|||
⚫ | |||
Base station routers will provide simpler, lower-latency 3GPP/2 networks. Key emerging players are: [[Alcatel-Lucent]], [[Airvana]], and Ubiquisys. |
|||
=== Key Considerations for Mobile Networks === |
|||
For WCDMA networks, the Direct Tunnel Architecture is emerging as the most viable evolution path. Currently, all major vendors support Direct Tunnel, where the SGSN is bypassed on the user plane. Even further advancement is Nokia-Siemens's Internet High-Speed Packet Access ([IHSPA]) architecture which also removes the RNC from the data path, thereby simplifying the architecture and reducing latencies even further.<ref>[http://www.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/portfolio/products/mobile-broadband/wcdmahspa/i-hspa] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120722151153/http://www.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/portfolio/products/mobile-broadband/wcdmahspa/i-hspa|date=July 22, 2012}}</ref> |
|||
In mobile networks, flat IP architectures integrate the following components:<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-06-11 |title=What Is A Flat Network? - ITU Online |url=https://www.ituonline.com/tech-definitions/what-is-a-flat-network/ |access-date=2024-09-26 |language=en-US}}</ref> |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
# Direct Tunnel Architecture: In this configuration, user data bypasses the Serving GPRS Support Node (SGSN) on the user plane. Direct Tunnel Architecture, supported by major vendors, reduces latency and complexity. Nokia-Siemens' Internet High-Speed Packet Access (IHSPA) takes this further by removing the Radio Network Controller (RNC) from the data path, resulting in even lower latencies. |
|||
⚫ | |||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
Line 38: | Line 54: | ||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
*[http://www.tcpipguide.com/free/t_NameSpacesandNameArchitecturesFlatandHierarchical.htm TcpIpGuide] |
*[http://www.tcpipguide.com/free/t_NameSpacesandNameArchitecturesFlatandHierarchical.htm TcpIpGuide] |
||
*[http://www.electrosmart.net/network/Flat-IP-Architecture.php ElectroSmart] |
*[http://www.electrosmart.net/network/Flat-IP-Architecture.php ElectroSmart] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071230032522/http://www.electrosmart.net/network/Flat-IP-Architecture.php |date=2007-12-30 }} |
||
*[http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/ Alcatel Lucent] |
*[http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/ Alcatel Lucent] |
||
*[https://iphoneimei.net/check-imei iPhone IMEI Checker] |
*[https://iphoneimei.net/check-imei iPhone IMEI Checker] |
Latest revision as of 19:12, 26 November 2024
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Flat IP is a network addressing scheme in which each device is assigned a unique identifier within a non-hierarchical address space. Unlike hierarchical IP addressing methods, Flat IP treats all devices as equal nodes, simplifying routing by eliminating the need for structured subnetting.
Flat IP is commonly applied in mobile networks, particularly in LTE, due to its efficiency in managing device handovers between network cells. The approach allows each device to be directly accessed through its unique identifier, improving routing efficiency and reducing latency in mobile environments.
While Flat IP may streamline network design for certain applications, it can present scalability challenges in larger networks. The scheme requires a substantial pool of unique identifiers and lacks a structured hierarchy, potentially reducing efficiency for large-scale networks compared to traditional IP models. Nonetheless, Flat IP is a practical choice in scenarios where simplicity and direct device access are priorities.
Flat IP architecture
[edit]This architecture is suitable for small businesses, home networks, and mobile broadband network operators because it simplifies network management and provides a direct link for real-time data applications.[1]
Overview
[edit]Wireless operators use Flat IP architecture to address the growing need for real-time data applications delivered over mobile broadband networks. This approach moves away from traditional hierarchical network designs, favoring a simplified, horizontal structure.
Benefits of Flat IP Architecture
[edit]Flat IP architectures offer several advantages, including:
- Cost Efficiency: Flat IP networks reduce reliance on specialized network hardware, such as ATM switches and MPLS routers, by utilizing a single level of communication. This approach lowers both hardware and maintenance costs.
- Improved Scalability and Flexibility: The absence of hierarchical layers simplifies the integration of new devices and services, benefiting mobile network operators in rapidly changing technological environments.
- Reduced Latency: By minimizing network layers and simplifying packet processing, flat IP architectures support latency-sensitive applications, such as Voice over IP (VoIP) and video streaming.[1]
In mobile networks, centralized anchors act as performance bottlenecks. Flat, distributed architectures avoid this by not having centralized components, thereby reducing latency and allowing for scalability and flexibility.[2]
Drawbacks and Challenges
[edit]Despite their benefits, Flat IP architectures present several challenges:
- Lack of Redundancy: Flat networks rely on a single switch or point of failure, making them vulnerable to outages if that switch fails.
- Difficult Troubleshooting: The simplicity of flat networks can complicate troubleshooting. With fewer hierarchical layers to isolate issues, identifying the root cause of network problems can be time-consuming.
- Increased Security Risks: Flat networks are more vulnerable to lateral attacks, where malware or intrusions can spread quickly between devices without traditional segmentation.
Use Cases of Flat IP Architecture
[edit]Flat IP architecture is particularly relevant to mobile networks and is supported by several industry standards organizations, including:
- 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) and 3GPP2: These organizations develop global standards for mobile telecommunication systems and have adopted flat IP principles in their network designs.
- WiMAX Forum: The WiMAX Forum, responsible for promoting and certifying wireless broadband technologies, was one of the early adopters of IP-centric mobile networks.
Key Considerations for Mobile Networks
[edit]In mobile networks, flat IP architectures integrate the following components:[3]
- Advanced Base Stations: Modern base stations in flat IP networks handle multiple functions, including radio control, header compression, encryption, call admission control, and policy enforcement. These stations often use IP/Ethernet interfaces to simplify network architecture and reduce latency.
- Direct Tunnel Architecture: In this configuration, user data bypasses the Serving GPRS Support Node (SGSN) on the user plane. Direct Tunnel Architecture, supported by major vendors, reduces latency and complexity. Nokia-Siemens' Internet High-Speed Packet Access (IHSPA) takes this further by removing the Radio Network Controller (RNC) from the data path, resulting in even lower latencies.
- WiMAX Access Services Network (ASN): WiMAX was the first standardized IP-centric mobile network architecture. Although HSPA and LTE networks have since become dominant, many principles from WiMAX ASN remain relevant in modern mobile networks.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b Tripathy, Susnigdha (2023-02-21). "What Is a Flat Network? Definition, Benefits & How It Works". Enterprise Networking Planet. Retrieved 2024-09-26.
- ^ Bokor, László; Faigl, Zoltán; Imre, Sándor (2011). Flat Architectures: Towards Scalable Future Internet Mobility. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. ISBN 978-3-642-20898-0. Retrieved 25 November 2024.
- ^ "What Is A Flat Network? - ITU Online". 2024-06-11. Retrieved 2024-09-26.